ML20062M153
| ML20062M153 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Callaway  |
| Issue date: | 12/28/1993 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20062M151 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9401060223 | |
| Download: ML20062M153 (2) | |
Text
o.
",xn:u
- /['
'o,'n UNITED STATES P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
- y,
.,E WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
\\,..v /
SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATED TO AMENDMENT NO. 88 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-30 UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY CALLAWAY PLANT. UNIT 1 DOCKET NO. 50-483
1.0 INTRODUCTION
By application for license amendment dated February 25, 1992, Union Electric Company (the licensee), requested changes to Technical Specifications (TS) for the Callaway Plant, Unit 1.
The proposed changes would revise Sections 6.5.2.2 and 6.5.3 to reflect the title change of the General Manager, Nuclear Operations.
2.0 EVALUATION The licensee has proposed changes to Section 6 of the Technical Specifications. The changes revise the title of the General Manager, Nuclear Operations to Vice President, Nuclear Operations for the Union Electric Company, Callaway Plant. Specifically, the title change reflects a company restructuring with no impact on line responsibility, reporting relationships, or approval authority. The proposed change does not affect minimum qualification commitments or the experience base at the Callaway plant.
Since the change is administrative in nature, the staff finds the proposed change acceptable.
3.0 STATE CONSULTATION
In accordance with the Commission's regulations, the Missouri State official was notified of the proposed issuance of the amendment. The State official had no comments.
4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION
i This amendment changes recordkeeping, reporting, or administrative procedures 1
or requirements. Accordingly, the amendment meets the eligibility criteria l
for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(10).
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b) no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment j
need be prepared in connection with the issuance of this amendment.
.l 9401060223 931228 PDR ADOCK 05000483:
P
- PDR, j
5.0 CONCLUSION
t l
The staff has concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that:
l (1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations, and (3) the issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.
Principal Contributor:
L. R. Wharton i
Date: December 28, 1993 i
i i