ML20062J776
| ML20062J776 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Seabrook |
| Issue date: | 11/12/1993 |
| From: | Feigenbaum T NORTH ATLANTIC ENERGY SERVICE CORP. (NAESCO) |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| GL-90-05, GL-90-5, NYN-93156, NUDOCS 9311170255 | |
| Download: ML20062J776 (21) | |
Text
_
s i
P.O. Box 300
-M 4 Seabrook, N H 03874 Telephone (603)474-9521
=
j
(
Facsimile (603)474-2987 Energy Service Corporation Ted C. Feigenbaum Senior Vice President and
{
4 Chief Nuclear Officer NYN-93156 I
I November 12,1993 l
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555
.f Attention:
Document Control Desk
References:
(a)
Facility Operating License No. NPF-86, Docket No. 50-443
[
I (b)
NRC Generic Letter 90-05 " Guidance for Performing Temporary Non-Code Repair of ASME Code Class 1,2, and 3 Piping", June 15,1990
'j
Subject:
Relief Request From ASME Code Section XI Requirements I
Gentlemen:
i North Atlantic Energy Service Corporation (North Atlantic) hereby requests, pursuant to NRC
]
~
Generic Letter 90-05, relief from the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section XI requirements l
pursuant to 10CFR50.55a(g)(6)(i). Attachment 1 provides a description of actions taken by Nonh Atlantic
(
to make temporary non-code repairs to a leak in the Service Water System (SW) line 1801-6-153-3". The SW System is a Class 3, moderate energy system. The non-code repair, a sof1 rubber gasket secured with a mechanical clamp, was completed at approximately 8:00 pm on November 11, 1993. This repair j
successfully isolated the leak.
-l The affected 3 inch line is one of three pressure sensing lines downstream of the two Train A i
ocean SW pumps. Attachment 2 identifies the leak location which is at a weldolet to flange shop weld.
[
The cooling tower actuation logic (2/3) in each SW Train senses ocean SW pump discharge pressure. A l
low pressure condition, indicative of a low-low SW pumphouse level, will initiate cooling tower actuation I
for the associated SW Train. The cooling tower actuation logic and function are unaffected by the non-l code repair.
I b
The leaking SW pressure sensing line cannot be isolated to perform a code repair. A code repair l
on this line would require panial draindown of SW Train A, resulting in the inoperability of the 2 ocean i
SW pumps and the cooling tower SW pump within this train. The inoperability of an utire SW Train
{
is not allowed by the requirements of Technical Specification 3/4.7.4 " Service Water System" and thus entry into Technical Specification 3.0.3 would be required and a plant shutdown would ensue.
l r
Consistent with the provisions of Generic Letter 90-05, Nonh Atlantic is submitting this relief l
request for a temporary non-code repair. Code repair of the degraded piping will be completed during i
the next outage exceeding 30 days but not later than the next refueling' outage which is scheduled to begin
.l in March 1994. The Resident inspector for Scabrook Station, Mr. Richard Laura, was notified of this i
repair.
l JGOP?G
[
ld y[@, a member of the Northeast Utilitie l
9311170255 931112 l'
I PDR ADOCK 05000443 l
P PDR
i v.*
\\
I United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission November 12,1993 Attention:
Document Control Desk Page two l
I t
Should you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Mr. Terry L. Ilarpster, Director
{
of Licensing Services at (603) 474-9521 extension 2765.
f.
i
/
Very truly yours, j
M
/1 led C. Feigenbdum_
t 1
TCF/ALL:sm Enclosure 4
cc:
Mr. Thomas T. Martm i
Regional Administrator U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region !
l 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406 l
l Mr. Albert W. De Agazio, Sr. Project Manager l
l Project Directorate 1-4 i
Division of Reactor Projects U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission i
Washington, DC 20555 3
Mr. Noel Dudley NRC Senior Resident Inspector P.O. Box 1149 i
Seabrook, Nil 03874 t
I i
r t
4 l
i i
i i
I i
j
\\
November 12,1993 l
NYN-93156 i
REllEF REOUEST FROM ASME CODE SECTION XI REOUIREMENTS l
Brown, B. E.
01-62 Cliche, R. R.
01-62
[
DiProfio, W. A.
49-SS Garfield, G.
DB&ll Kacich, R. M.
NUSC Kline, G. J.
02-08 Sobotka, J. E.
49-CE Vargas, J. M.
01-62 Executive Offices 01-40 LIC Routing Offices 01-48 Subject File 01-48 j
File 0001 01-48 RMD 02-06 i
a i
l 4
i i
l
t North Atlantic
-1 i
November 12,1993 l
e t
-i
.a q
s
'i ATTACIIMENT 1 TO NYN-93156 i
i y
7
'i i
t
}
i h
?
4 I
i l
t h
I i
?
f s
I t
t t
t 1
i
{-
I i
r
)
i I
y h
E
+
s 4
l t
?
I b
i
_ ~
SEABROOK STATION 1
FORM FOR RELIEF REQUEST FROM ASME SECTION XI REQUIREMENTS 1
i SIR # 93-099 DATE 11/11/93 TIME: Approx. 2:00 a.m.
1.0 ORIGINATOR l
1.1 DESCRIPTION
OF FLAW i
There is thru wall flaw causing leakage on line 1801-6-153-3". The leak is at a shop weld between the weldolet and flange upstream of valve SW-V48 and SW-PT8273.
i The flaw has an approximate dimension of %" x %".
This location on the Service Water "A" train is in a well drained pit, el. 4*-0", in the Service Water Pumphouse.
Piping / Component Drawing No.:
j The weldolet and flange are carbon steel with 1/8" thick cement lining as detailed on sketch 804998 of specification 248-2 (Refer to Attachment 2).
F P&ID No.:
l-SW-B/D20794 i
1.2 IMPRACTICALITY OF CODE REPAIR I
The leaking SW pressure sensing line cannot be isolated to perform a code repair. A -
code repair on this line would require partial draindown of SW Train A, resulting in j
the inoperability of the 2 ocean SW pumps and the cooling tower SW pump within this train. The inoperability of an entire SW Train is not allowed by the requirements of Technical Specification 3/4.7.4 " Service Water System" and thus entry into Technical Specification 3.0.3 would be required and a plant shutdown would ensue.
1.3 DESCRIPTION
OF PROPOSED TEMPORARY REPAIR A soft rubber gasket with mechanical clamp will be used.
l I
1.4 SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE: System Interaction Evaluation i
Flooding:
?
There is a leak of approximately 2% gpm coming from the %" x %" thru wall flaw at f
the 3 inch shop weld described above. Ultrasonic Examination has confirmed there to l
be no additional degradation at this shop weld.
The leakage is well contained within the SW pumphouse " pit area" and more than j
adequate drainage capability exists to preclude flooding.
l f
I a
j SEABROOK STATION FORM FOR RELIEF REQUEST FROM ASME SECTION XI REQUIREMENTS i
Jet Spray:
There are no safety related power supplies or equipment that could be disabled as a result of the jet spray from this flaw. The leakage and spray is well contained in the i
SW pumphouse " pit area", el. 4'-0", approximately 15 feet below any equipment of this type.
Loss of Flow-Loss of SW thru this flaw is insignificant to the Service Water pump or Cooling Tower pump capacity to supply design base flow during an accident combined with i
LOP. One Service Water pump must supply 8,700 gpm or 11,360 gpm from one 4
Cooling Tower pump to satisfy design heat loads from ECCS and the Emergency Diesel Generator, a
Other Interactions:
None.
i l
Failure Consequences?
I l
Total failure of this weld could result in SW "A" train inoperability and per technical specifications a forced shutdown would commence.
System pressure loss via this postulated 3 inch diameter break would most likely cause I
a tower actuation signal to occur. Since this line is within the pressure boundary of a
the SW system when on the tower, cooling tower pump flow would degrade sufficiently to necessitate a shutdown of SW-P-110A.
j i
There is no mteraction with the SW "B" train which alone can accommodate design base heat loads.
Impact to Safe Shutdown Capability?
As described above the SW "B" train which would be unaffected by total failure of i
this "A" train weld. The "B" train alone is sufficient for safe shutdown decay heat removal heat loads or heat loads during a design base event with LOP.
l
}
6 t
a
T SEABROOK STATION FORM FOR RELIEF REQUEST FROM ASME SECTION XI REQUIREMENTS 1.5 ROOT CAUSE INVESTIGATION Root Cause
Description:
A localized flaw in the cement lining caused accelerated corrosion at this shop weld.
Other Systems Affected:
None.
1.6 AUGMENTED INSPECTION Assessment of overall degradation of the affected system:
The leak is typical of localized cement lining flaws in carbon steel SW piping. These leaks do not result from large areas of damage but from very localized wall loss.
An ultrasonic examination of the shop weld circumference was performed. The only wall loss is at the %" x M" flaw location.
Additional examinations required (based on root cause) - specify number of inspection locations - also specify frequency of inspections: [ ten most susceptible and accessible locations for high energy piping system and five for moderate enery,y piping system]
Ultrasonic Examination has been completed at the same shop weld at five additional locations (Attachment 3,5 pages):
"A" train upstream of SW-V116 "A" train upstream of SW-V114 "B" train upstream of SW-V119 "B" train upstream of SW-Vil7 "B" train upstream of SW.V49 No wall loss found at any of the above locations.
Description of areas selected for augmented inspection:
These are locations of similar fabrication, configuration, and service environment.
t l
4
SEABROOK STATION FORM FOR RELIEF REQUEST FROM ASME Sr ' TION XI REQUIREMENTS 2.0 STRESS ANALYSIS 2.1 DESIGN DETAILS System:
Service Water "A" Train Downstream of SW Pump 110A Component:
Weld between weldolet and weld neck flange Component Size:
3" x 24" weldolet 3" 150 lb weld neck flange Nominal Wall Thickness:
0.215" (minimum)
Safety Code Class:
Class 3 Alaterial:
SA-105 i
l Design Pressure:
150 psig 1
I Design / Operating Temperature:
200/34-65 Code Afinimum Wall Thickness:
0.015" 2.2 FLAW CH AR ACTERIZATION I
Flaw Description / Size: (i.e., flaw size, adjacent wall thickness, single / multiple i
flaw, total area examined, etc.)
The flaw is highly localized. The through wall portion of the flaw is %" x %" and i
the minimum adjacent wall thickness is 0.330".
Flaw Location:
The flaw is located upstream of SW-V48.
l Alethod Examination:
UT Flaw Type:
Through wall flaw due to erosion / corrosion Referenced UT Afeasurements: (3 pages) 2.3 FLAW EVALUATION
SUMMARY
i Alethod Used:
j "Through-Wall Flaw" Approach (GL 90-05). This method considers a through wall flaw and evaluates the flaw stability by a linear elastic fracture mechanics methodology.
{
i
.~
e f
SEABROOK STATION j
FORM FOR RELIEF REQUEST FROM ASME SECTION XI REQUIREMENTS Results of Evaluation:
Loading conditions included dead weight, pressure, thermal, and seismic. All code i
stress equations were considered and determined to be acceptable. Stability of flaw was evaluated for all loading conditions and determined to be acceptable. Results of i
evaluation are summarized below.
ASME III, SUBSECTION ND, STRESS EVALUATION '
DESIGN ACTUAL STRESS ALLOWABLE
~ ACTUAL CONDITION (PSI)
STRESS (PSI)
ALLOWABLE Normal 2,391 1 7,58 i 0.14 Upset 5,728 21,000 0.27 Faulted 7,896 31,500 0.25 t
.1 FLAW STABILITY CHECK STRESS INTENSITY FACTOR (KSI (IN)'*)
FACTOR OF SAFETY l
ACTUAL CRITICAL CRITICAL / ACTUAL 13.01 35.0 2.69 t
i 2.4 FLAW MONITORING Walkdown Frequency: (for leak monitoring) f At least once per week.
i Frequency of Follow-up NDE: (for erosion rate assessment)
~j At least once every three months.
l i
l i
t North Atlantic November 12,1993 t
l
-i ATTACHMENT 2 TO NYN-93156 i
e a
P t
9 h
h i
i t
i 4
+ w A
- - - - - -. Jz e tu../. r n,.,/d
. y i
4
. _. ~
.. fitt O satn bevE L W TAIL FOtt 4' r; " "rusW 3t
- f*tPE g'Fo rr/N ce.5
'A ^Th W E l -]
A
(
l
_o_. L 10 c. n.
h
'A '
b~
- 1. A conroas or Getss 8 S.at Cur uana e
....- w
,,,s.-
~ ~~
r~~~~~r
.xva.x avu-n.
t.u we.
en, 4.
r= r.'s ce aar ca.e a.
1 Ju W
o.ssi
- 2. vten,ses 7. raer zo sa.e s ms c'- me.=, - -
3a*
s i n.'
!.*,1t2
%3s.
)
31
,,.. u r,y
.s~~
W a as.
~ ' " " * ~ ~ =
'.~v.*.~. e*~ ~......e.c n e-n o r..
s."-.
~~~
g 3'
24*
2s ssa ss s.s' s rs-'
. s va'
"**-***-"***"*"?"*'*'(c='~'**'**
l
- m.,.....,
as -as.ew).
.A._
l..***.'.*.*
to" it rso r,s.3-
.vs*
M' o. i,7'
.M*
3f.
e ss,ece to ret fa s%e i.n> s *-.m 44.
I e.Lcu u-if,,.nr,.,-
u4
.,,r rrmc-~~~-
ra--
~
,,,e.. a.
sW.i-Q,j ht U htL in-
/s..
,,. r w-rg,.
..a i
. C rnt seesas saast ser_ e.nore.a (are
. ertsetens w
..ar*
r.
cc
~-~s
~~ c ~~r ~ -, - /~. ~
. ~,
~..,,......,..r.~.c,...
u,,, x,,.,._
e-r;
- e.,, e r-~~~,
- r....-~. ~. e
. u, an
.q ? ',':ll;~,**,"L
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
- u~.a t c ~-r v~~* ~~ ~ ~u m( ",..,,,.,,,
- r :, -
v; orar.
~r>~.---~~~.r-~~.~
c a.s-e.w n-
.,ar
(
3,,
.-.-..-,,,r.,e.,,..~
.c e.,a
~ m,\\
f
\\
\\
ens ~.na aus **em rere su sneu e. nn wem.
g 3,nor s nas 2.asL.,,.,,.,,,
,...,,' a s e m tw e
raava snor
?:*,*....'.m....:...-l'...:.:-b.
y-
~;
- =
f, *. : ::
xm r,,
,.,,.)e**
g.
y,7,,
,g 7
..e.,.
f Ra ou.ea ret ars as ren wes e J.mt.
lCretrur itere*#G Ew.1 $ Nail St Ceaf a b **#ra, K PA N PfrE.l m r4~n.DO e ate t op.
.e.e-coa r.
- s...
a-
. c....y p,p g i
.n r cee rouwo srac e4t r==evua 4 -
~.4,=-95 $4*457 to se isnAelb 'trre's,.ets. noel. AreLY To Y
S Y* S. b.A.a.10 enP J fl4*JG t ENb $Y000$ kr*O f erS e
1*4ntt a ns tAL L,8& Sort Tuh2.b., f'Ane
- t. J wo.e. prog, A pat Y 7.
4=
3*
3g*
gd?"J'7T%$ [y-g ARLpe0T RELinttu6 POLYORt T 68 ANS 8MsitT:
e Art, Attest
- F* S.
E ts., 44Fru e w atb#ir6 PsPS.
r I\\
PER b.go4TTIAND arf A &dfTfad G Te Gh/FT g
g*
g*
\\
. fay VAavt3 3HAtt Havt SMA bug to 74eb-8 At toe.w med
.f Po.T c,r ein ar. 7 APa m. 4.an*86 5,,,..a.............
na o w n oevu..oer>,n.. m.fa vire y,rria g.
,..a,
~.....
...,,........ 4.
,,cs i
lo "
4 A N.
?""'"'" L
. u. :.--'~ ~~
f*t f*
\\
L
~
/
Z. THIROUGH 3N. frst1ML,r,L*Jr. Conn.croeus
&\\\\
f p.g.,
re ce+,e er o ~eu eiec.
J
\\
\\
h 4.4b [ 0 4 ko *1
- *k I
w
\\
-~ ~~ ~
,,.,. ~ ~.
mi,...~..
m....,....... r v.
~
._, n m._.
n certestrian er.kwr se est arrticastt tieto rAo(tbuetm
{
q t-g u,
4g p!
r
<.u ns,h' f Ma Z*l*,'" l,;*;7s ur T T s
Aals t J
c e,,.~ r a s~,~+
0 2 M r.eett saao sever. rea._
' 5" '* /;*,
, I<
sJ Ldei i
y r.,. l _-
l N,,..r n
ga
,_'.7.'_~<~*
re o.
A ~ r s = = u s en -.
rortuess 2Wranun?t.
q g y n,
h
=.
==
== = =.
- T T
{
==
c E* *"
j'y 1to ih
.[
T.'2Y**
f
}
p:>rpe sna Jotur Deaf'GrL x
ran CErse**r LI"Eb n~e g
1, even fer ot.ous l'rtre'&..-
I(1y,,- Q y,
.t'y.
L g,gh s.
/ d;,,* qge$
3 ru uc eenwice co or new waar***a
. ar TAILI d.
41 g; -
gue"userisnimme.-
~i~
g
.g..,... sy~. a 4 *.==p. r.re.,
9y, 3 -p-8o4 ? 78
. =.
f
)
North Atlantic l
November 12.1993
.i i
i f
m I
t f
t t
ATTACilMENT 3 TO NYN-93156 i
fi
[
!i e
P i
i i
?
?
1 I
i f
?
l a-i r
v
[
l
?
s l
s i
4 I
'1
W8CW$$A/7 A
ULTRASONIC THICKNESS EXAMIh[ATION REPORT
%<T/J3 Sbibmp Mm e-SYSTEM Se<>
WORK REQUEST 934. loo 3 713 LOCATION EXAMINATION AREATRESULTS CESC ON OF EXAMNATION AREA AND RESULTS IE2 50An1on ll/~A<
Scs n nint.
i n aJ 82 3 n s, o Y 8Llb G L: f./ ?~ ou iL L Rt TN+=n-S //) E oG YAL 6' b L=
00 N Gr 7Jht.cw q 14 Pa,,,r G - a )an.o i, to --
- 9 ~ /h r~
As ru.> n-w U P C n 2.c s., of: Sui - V 4R
/
P 51AnGV
& &n n L e1~ -
SKETCH { induce ots:-xsona.componems eennsms, ec)
EXAMINED LENH[ CATE // !1j EXAMINED L1"\\R_ CATE EXAMINATION RESULTS ACCEPTABLE EVALUAT10H REQ'D REVIEWED LEVEL.
DATE
[h CATE //////93 REVIEWED
-. n,
@ ATTACHED INSTRUMENT DATA MFGMOCELbM65db,/br4MMWbN O[f# YSE TRANSDUCER INSTRUMENT:
OcaT O car /o'crt^'
B o'c2T^'
0 "oatzoST^t uNE>arTv eERFonMED g e:TCaiCATCs COV? SURFACE TEMP >125' h NO ]YES FLS No.
CAL DUE CATE O PULSE / ECHO
"" S*"Y e.u ewcx
=
,foo
- 1. 3 s v i. Sc o I cau tue O 030 6,48 2 I C4m 2 I A 4 8 2. I INr%"lu d &L
==
'" W "* L ""
- l00 289 l.go o I omo go
"~
}O0 254 l
.C00 l J O 4_C l
COUPLANT l
l MFG.$CYOblLT2.AGb~L$
/ Cr O l 389
,FOOl
///J BATCH #
9N Q A G/ C A /2 88 ENGINEERING EVALUATION NJA ATTACHED SEE BELOW EVALUATIOtiCOMMENTS O ACCEr1 O aEr*> amer'*CE n ae" 't" c o>e -
o 1-Page 1 of 1 ES1Bc7.012A Rev. 0
/~
ULTRASONIC THICKNESS EXAMINATION SKEg,H7
,,3 L)y 577nn cQ LOCATION S co -V W SYSTEM SM WORK REQUEST.2540 3723 I
I II I
Il I
I I
I iII l
l l
l l
l l 1II I
I l
l 1
1Il l
I IQ I I
IIA ml l II!II II i
l JOl d lCt.Vi i
l I
lot-I y J,ca;3 ss7a l
I l@>1 I
I I N I
IIIIII I
I I soJJ lIII I A i
i I
I I
IT L IIIIIIII
'l IIIii1I JfliIII l@
IIIII I
I IIIIIII
- l t i ll II I;
IIIII I
III II IIIII l\\
I IIIIK II I
I I
I I
,III III I N I
I I
IAW II I
I I
IIl
@ lWi@r l l
I II II
,i IiI 11i
?!I I
I IIIII IIIIIII III IIII I
I II II I
I l-1II II
!III I
l l
l l.
.I III 1i Iili I
I I
l III II I
l de/M i
I li I
~7ab J
ll I
nerb J
l i
r il II I
I I I N It Ili N I I
IIIIII II IIIIIIII N \\1 Il l/
I1I IIIIII II IIiiIIII tR*t iII IIIIII II1 1IIIIIII II I
III II I
I IIIII1III I
I, I l
iII I
I I
IIIIII I
I l
If I
I III I
I III IIIIIII I
I/
II!
II l
l l
l ili Il!IIIII l/lIII I
I III!I I
I I
I I
I l
-f I
II l
l l
l i
!l!IIIIII I
I II II I
II III III IIIIli II
!! IIII Ii li II I iI! i1il II I
I II I
IIII IIIIIIIIIIII II I
I I
l ll I
!II I IIII I
II I
I!I ~I I
II I
I IIIII I
II
!Ii li I
II I
I I
I I
i I
i ll I
I I
I I
I i1 I
I I
I I
{s{feks
W/R 93W003723 Sheet 3g3 Data Point Inboard l
Weld Outboard 1
.418
.409
.284 2
.391
.425
.292
.409
.336 3
.340 371 4
.392
.388
.376
.381 5
.325
.402
.373
.330 6
.365 7
.374
.286
~
8
.383
.376
.324 9
.430
.430
\\
.334
.408
.411 10
.423
.370
.375 3i
ULTRASONIC THICKNESS-EXAMINATION REPORT Sdokeme / dose SYSTEM Sed WORK REQUEST 93/<)oc3 713 LOCATION EXAMINATION AREATRESULTS Dg!PTION OF E"XAMINAT10N AREA AND RESULTS Yxn.poxmm (17' % o f (Ost n uP S rk Lm s, o p 1~S u - Vit7.
(2 7 r 1 H 10 a c. a Pmour.
k t w i A?//sv & n L t-4e cm. r a-An un-s r k wan a c.
t SKETCH provee otse xsona. cxxn:raneas. ex:ensaans. ec)
EXAMINED
/
J LEVEL CATE //*//.9J A nsas r fe u,~q W
EXAM;NED LLTL~ CATE de.o VPsree>w of EXAMINATION RESULTS b-- Y // 7
/8 2, 7,f ACCEMABLE EVALUAM RE70 REVIEWED LEVEL CATE g*
/h d CATE //d83 REVIEWED S og ap kg o
f O ATTACHED INSTRUMENT DATA MFG /MODEL b7465S[f2.
E /4M/@TE/SN dbY TRANSDUCER INSTRUMENT:
/
OcnT O caTioictr^'
B o'crt^'
O Hoat:oNTAL UNEARITY PERFORMED
@ PITCH 1 CATCH COMP SURF ACE TEMP >125*
hNO CYES FLS No.
CAL DUE CATE Oev'sEiECHo
"'** S*"N'-
m uw.
~m
,too I.389
. sc o I cnu tue SON L,4R 2 i(A R 2 fe 4 B 2-l I???q%M *" h_ FPIO.iMHz
&&L
~~
S!ZE
,/cn> I.7E4 I.so o I oso g=
=
loo 289 l coa l 10 4_c Nu l
COUPLANT l
VFG. SCJ/O ft2L TtA ffL $
/ Cr O g}Q
,$OO l l/()
BATCHG V0VI QA Q/ OA /10?
O ^TT^c"a=
0 set ac'o*
ENGINEERING EVALUATION K'A EVALUA110NCOMMENTS mmm.
I o nw - etACE R - eEn,e,
C.1.
ACCEn Page 1 of 1 ES1807.012A Rev. O
ULTRASONIC THICKNES bEXAMINATION REPORT S/<ebm/ dse SYSTEM SA)
WORK REQUEST 934)cic3 713 LOCATION EXAMINATION AREA /RESULTS DESC IPT10N OF EXAMINATION AREA AND AESULTS
- 22. Pot w en Ed r St w o 1:~
(AM U) 37A. n ~ o a /~.5 ca - st /c i
() T Tff%cu L st
?At~r. bm r s: Y Asar. ft) n s. L doex,-t:
ks 9 57 t!71 D t tv (, -
SKETCH Ondade obc rJons, com;onents, ex: ens:ns. ec)
Laco es t $m, ~ 4 Po n
~~Ab LSTLE DATE //[// fj EXAMINED EXAMINED LLTL_ CATE aja.o o /sra.sg,.,
oa EXAMINATION RESULTS
/- S w - V //L is.. A77 R) ^ccEnmz
=^vo" "wo REV!EWED LEVE' _ DATE
[C Q
REMEWED
//
4 CATE ///e/9J
~
b/0 (f 0 P f.L)s.2 0.
" w~
O ATT^caEo INSTRUMENT DATA MFGNOCEL 5M&iSb.,/[fMp/gnTE/SN#((# Y
- NSTRUMENT:
TRANSDUCER Ocar OcaToorr^'
S o' ort ^' O HOR:ZONTAL LINEARfTY PERFORMED
@ PTTCH / CATCH COMP SURF ACE TEMP >125' Q NO ]YES FLS No.
CAL CUE DATE OPULSE/ ECHO Sr'e5-
" F "-
e-
.ieo l.3a9
.soo I ca tw SEPJ OM (o 4A 2 I fe4A 2
/c4 B 2. I 5lcT.5 /
"'O'
==
m
- /Cro l
.284 ).So o 0220 f*
100
%E91. coo t o 45-m" COUPLANT I
MFG. ECJ/o ff2L 72. A G b'L Y f cr o l 2E9
.S'0 0 \\
/ / I' 2 BATCHn 9092 d? A 9/ C A /2 88 ENGINEERING EVALUATION K'A ATTACHED SEE BELOW EVALUAT104 COMMENTS ma O ACcErT aErA>a=ErLACs r< ne, >is emo'a -
c 1-
%iei ES1807.012A Renr. O
ULTRASONIC THICKNES bEXAMINATION REPORT LOCATION S/
/du t e-SYSTEM St<>
WORK REQUEST 93/cloe3 713
-p EXAMINATION ARENRESULTS CESCR' i ON OF EXAMINATION AREA AND RESULTS I/D2 P'02.m LtE Y
bW YW u Q +4
/4 i *u l' OF GG Vnr pir.c Men Lt )n u L ~
U P S T2. & ap /-Scd - V119 ln a ru"
$ba)L25r t?'A Dr M L i
SKETCH (trCJCe Nxtona, w w +T5, extensions, ec)
EXAMINED 1,
LEVEL [ CATE //-//.9)
A.w o r-Aenoi ~ c, Po <1-EXAMINED LEVEL CATE Y 1 S 772. t.w oP LNIA.$
l
/
EXAMINATION RESULTS
/ - 6 4 t.) - t// / 7
/5 1C 2
% ACCEPTABLE EVALUATION REQ'D b
p*
REVIEVED LEVEL DATE REVIEWED
/
M CATE //[//,93
~'
106" OP Qp,
INSTRUMENT DATA j
M.4'MCDEL bM6W7b /d2dA/yGTE/SN MW TRANSDUCER INSTRUMEW:
OcaT OCaT>oicTA' 8o'crt^'
O "oa2' o"T^t uNEAR Tv rERFoRuCD a PITCH / CATCH COMP SURF ACE TEMP >105*
h NO CYES FLS No.
CAL DUE CATE Oev'seicCso E*"5
~~cc
. ieo l.389 l.soo c n twe mm SW 05 Q 4g7 l(gp 7 f (c 4 g g_
}ll&g wrdjfL me
- W **L""*
- Ior) 289 l.go o i opzo mm
~
loo 234 \\.200 10 4C COUPLANT
==
MFa. EC./fo kJL M A C,EL [
/oo 289
,60Ol
///]
BATCHs 90 9 QA 9/ QA /2 88 ENGINEERING EVALUATION C KA ATTACHED SEE BELOW EVALUAT104 COMMENTS Cato ACCEPT REPA!R' REPLACE Responsible Engmeer Page 1 of 1 ES1807.012A Rev, O
d ULTRASONIC THICKNES 5 EXAMINATION REPORT Sb> N>mp /dme SYSTEM SA)
WORK REQUEST 934M3 713 LOCATION EXAMINA'llON AREA /RESULTS CESQRIFilON OF EXAMINATION AAEA AND RESULTS
% cam eo ur Sea ~ oc id n o ups reen ~
ep
$0'W' 'O = =
I-S u)- Vll4 i H-ac u t, a Pa i ~,
t/mt. r a y
?
l6 ea w Ao n3 au-ben Ana f; Miv O.) A k L
~
SKETCH prcuos ote. cons. comparems, econs;ons, er_)
LEVEL [ DATE //-//-fj EXAMINED.
._o S
WMT Vf}-p p m b EXAMNE3 LEVEL _ CATE O*
EXAMINATI.ON RESULTS
@ ACCEPTABLE EMUAMN REQt o P /- S 6.> - y/ / /4 i _s g1
[ C 'dhg REV!EWED LEVEL _ DATE REV!EWED M
CATE ///MJ S,,,, k)n o
-.m.
O ^TT^c"Eo s
j INSTRUMENT DATA MFG'MODEL bMetsb,/[rf44pTE5N
[" Y T W SDUCER INSTRUMENT; OcaT O cat >oio:T^'
B oiorT^'
O HoacoNT^L UNEARffY PERFORMED
@ PTTCH / CATCH COVP SURF ACE TEMP >125*
hNO OYES FLS No.
CAL DUE OATE O eutsEiECso
" ' * - 5
'c'
. ioo I. s a s t. sc o I e n on-
~~
80 6 482 164A 2 1 A4 B 2. I l#7 W u "" W
- ddTL-
=*
- L"
= lco 289 l.go a l ono go
~
}UO EEN l. COO I J D 4t"~
l l
COUPLANT l
l VFG. kC//O f/2L %A Gb'L $
./OO l gJ9 l,FOO l
///]
BATCH #
90N QA Q/ OA /2 8fi ENGINEERING EVALUATION WA ATTACHED SEE BELOW EVALUATIONCOMMENTS O AcCErT aEr>>a=Er' ACE a Pom:e> term -
o i-d ES1007.012A Rev.O l
9 ULTRASONIC THICKNESS EXAMINATION REPORT Sbebmp /Ime SYSTEM Sed WORK REQUEST 934)oo3 713 LOCATION EXAMINATION AREA /RESULTS CEKR;FTION OF EXAMINATION AfiEA AND RESULT 3 Ynrer mw aY Sw % u c. H ?Avar o P 4]n n UPsTRemA ef f - S O 3 - \\f 4 9 '-
Vera. t p-v Ak. Oh u -
Azzc.aa. n -
L w m r-E en o, w t, i
SKETCH (Inciuos obex'Jora componens. ecenssa, et) kusmr Eno,,uq Fo n-
~
J 1811 d CAM g d M EXAMINEA EXAMINED trEL DATE O
Ib DN M oF EXAMINATION RESU TS
- c=c"*='c 1-s as - y q q is 25 g -
~'u*?c~ "~c
@M
'a'ocv F16 R _ o 7 A LBJ s eA,.s m REVIEWED LEVEL D4TE
" " * * ~ "
5ioa o e ak.o.
O ATTACHED 1
l I
INSTRUMENT D/li A l
MFG /MODEL b746557b /bugggGTE!SN MY INSTRUMENT:
TRANSDUCER t
Ocat O caToorr^'
B c'crr^'
O HoaccsT^tuNEAnrTv eEnFcnuED g Prics / cafes COMP SUnFACE TEMP pin
- h NO O ves r's so-catcuec^TE D PULSE / ECHO
~'-
cuswcx mos
, /oo l.3e9 I. So o I CdLtue EE9 MM (o 4A 2. ! /c4 i2 I /c 4 B 2. 1
[NrY4 V
"^dM
=
"m
- /Cro \\
289 l.so o I OR20 gm
/co I 789 !.s; co i
/c #c
- =
1 1
l coVPLANT I
I l
MFa. kCJfo lt217tA C,615
/ cs o l 2E9 \\ 20ol
///]
eATcna 90G QA ?/ OA /2 88 ENGINEERING EVALUATION NA ATTACHED SEE BELOW EVALUAT104 COMMENTS i
ACCEPT REPA!R, REPLACE Responsltas E.ngineer Cate i
Page 1 of 1 l
ES1807.012A Rev.0
= ei i d i ESM Mu
.c
,h
,p t (.
i $.; U. 3l'fd iji h!!)U l I!aPii t
'ij
- Mi d i ll E :
?
g
,,c p 3 c,t
- e..I R e,! : -
- es. 'W=e w I
- . s.
- 6..
.< E s..! ; t 3 3
=*y s
i
,=1
",o d.d d W it 0
.~..
== t l
0 2 e k =. :. 2 C o R p. g c
es e
d*(82.ng
- L
?4-g
- 2 3 0w=T
- ov ap to
.atz.
. $ ?
w i
-n
- - I hga s egir;.1 a x a < =1.;
w et c
w e t. ~r3 :. 4 oth '
.res}:
g4
!s m
- w*se-l,
.2e z.
f i.
' -E I
3 T-3v
- 4. 2 %
- 9*;Ls.'51=5a!9: t E
I wuoug
-3 o
-r
- t r a "r' t. : t.e = 1., r :. t. i ~ 31 2 <1 W ", :
-1
.Y ly---e,r4 e 2
1
. vi o
r.
m,r
.3,',
1C.
u -**
.2 q !) 3:
I.g
=
=Ez R:<sg r
i
=
< <c i :
Ell *5 s h-
~
t~j 51
. ' 4. tl e f t.) t e edW,.l W
-tt
';.t
.s a
z 3!
4 r
ri di;s u,
E N. 40'.
e.g If o
I f% l g d a t'i!!r($sEMj{'
ga A
U lI I
!)i!. 8!
11:
3 ci 5547 M fg;r,al. h=2:f}o,qi air a r s.a % =q er g
- (
w e
.o I
I f, f j33,p.
iigy f
3
- !!f:'. :M : :,=
E g
d 3 = s e; : \\ *J.s E O.E,3 e
5,..
5 Sa.
- 3 4f 2 # I t E.g j iaj' 3I jlE: I 0. : *E[$
$ "" yi;i
!?! !!a,$ f5535: 5 # f1g3" 4 3 L j{N j."
}-
e w,
.a u
1 M. g-e
..~.......,.
t b
u u
It a!
3 i
s' a
e "r
-' b5
.1 I
[
~
L I
Ee 5
W t
3 3.
a.
r o
o i,
r j
f'\\
7 o
g k
' * = =
- d $ $ h it h h f
a c
a y
u i b -r-f I
}
l l
l l
l f:;$ " ;,
,p e
d p
p g
j g a,
id 4
a so i'
ry 4
i o
im m
l m
la.-
l I {.
'a I
w t
i.
t t
N p
i.
b,)
i a
a x
9 J
c u
j
- d,,
"";=%,NJ gp i
'a 3
'flj l r1 i
i
~:
tu
\\c:.w.
i u
i af v.:
~.
n.
e.
c,..:
o n
'e v
,xt V
v
~
e
=
c f
- f I
b k
pL y,6 a
-l s
r n-n n
S e
e 3
Qi 8~j :q p i ~
c a
o V
a x
a e
a m b 4 g
4 o e
- N i
1 4'p
!!'s
!h'
[o e
d,.E
<a l N.}-[
t i
o3n e
i$
i' p*:I
%: \\.* F a
k'l j
'u-4'p!.
{su e
t:
. ?,..
cc i:t EM i
Q3 f'...-
os-j:
3 f,)
r, 1
pf'.3 1
ggj 4
e a
4 a?
/.' -
i
.c 3
e y M.4.
k k g
i
?" 13 m'
2 Y
H
- G. lM-
<i
^
3...). i
\\. /
v i<
n
- .. p.
.:1 i s
';c i
3Ty
.i w*
a-
-i!(l a u-I =
t o
-.d*1,,+ f.82N nK Nap d**
e., :!
A i;;. ;.
gg E
+.
?
.e a n.
o._
L.
M.B. ;
d0N-t5 F:F. 4 l4 E
rp ji'
- - (&.$epn:
t 1
r s
a
)
7 M._
g.y,t_
- er.
3 l
c4*U 4,
$a 1
m.
s c
Ir I
x' ~,,)g
~
v u
o
.: g.
2z i.
l'Y E 4 Il a, e t
u 7
1 1
}
11,'.]'
tr.
r y
I
__i nm----
-