ML20062F130

Forwards SE Supporting Util Responses to Generic Ltr 83-28, Item 1.2 Re post-trip Review - Data & Info Capability

ML20062F130
Person / Time
Site:	Point Beach
Issue date:	11/14/1990
From:	Samworth R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Fay C WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER CO.
Shared Package
ML20062F134	List: ML20062F130 ML20062F136
References
GL-83-28, TAC-53620, TAC-53621, NUDOCS 9011270107
Download: ML20062F130 (3)

Text

- - - -. _. . .. .. _.

. . ~ - .-- -

-t o'

, November 14, 1990 Docket Nos. 50-266 DISTRIBUTION and 50-301 <5Etet. m e / PD33 Gray NRC & Local PDRs Region !!!, 3RP PD33 Reading DCrutchfield JZwolinski Mr. C. W. Fay, Vice President PKreutzer Nuclear Power Department R$amworth Wisconsin Electric Power Company OGC 231 W. Michigan Street, Room 308 EJorden i Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53201 ACRS(10) j Dear Mr. Fay l

SUBJECT:

GENERIC LETTER 83-28 ITEM 1.2, POST-TRIP REVIEW - DATA AND INFORMATIONCAPABILITY(TACN05,53620AND53621)

By Generic Letter 83-28 dated July 8,1983, we requested that Wisconsin I Electric Power Company provide information for the Point Beach Nuclear l Plant on a nueer of concerns which arose from a February 23, 1983, event i at the Salem Nuclear Power Plant. Item 1.2 of that generic letter sought I information on Post-Trip Review, Data and Information Capability. You l responded to the generic letter by letters dated November 7,1983 June 1 '

and December 28, 1984, and February 28, 1985. l We reviewed your response to ensure that .vou have the capability to record, l recall and dis slay data and information which will permit diagnosing the causes of unscieduled reactor shutdowns and for ascertaining the proper functioning of safety-related equipment. Based on our review of your submittals, we have concluded that your post-trip review data and information capabilities are acceptable for Item 1.2 of the generic letter.

Our review noted that the parameters which you monitor and record do not match those identified in the generic letter. While we have found your alternative parameters acceptable, our safety evaluation notes that recording of specific additional parameters would serve to improve and expedite post-trip reviews.

I urge you to give careful consideration to this aspect of our evaluation. l A copy of the safety evaluation is enclosed, i Sincerely.

OriginalSigned By:

Robert B. Samworth, Sr. Project Manager Project Directorate 111-3 Division of Reactor Projects - III, IV, V and Special projects .

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Enclosure:

As stated cc w/ enclosure: See next pa e PDJ3*LA PD33:PM

/ PD33:D O PJrdtzer RSamworth/bj [JHanngn H /6 /90 ff/fyf90 p' //f/90 9011270107 901114

DR ADOCU 0500 .

6 (0,I w . ..-.. _

November 14, 1990 4

Docket Nos 50 266 DISTRIBUTION

.4 and 50 301 Docket File PD33 Gray NRC & Local PDRs Region Ill, DRP PD33 Reading DCrutchfield JZwolinski Mr. C. W. Fay, Vice President PKreutzer Nuclear Power Department RSamworth Wisconsin Electric Power company OGC 231 W. Michigan Street, Room 308 EJordan Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53201 ACRS(10)

SUBJECT:

GENERIC LETTER 83-28 ITEM 1.2, POST-TRIP REVIEW - DATA AND INFORMATIONCAPABILITY(TACNOS.53620AND53621)

By Generic Electric Letter Power 83-28provide Company dated information July 8,1983,for the Point Beach Nuclearwe requested that Wisco Plant on a nunber of concerns which arose from a February 23, 1983, event at the Salem Nuclear Power Plant. Item 1.2 of that generic letter sought information on Post-Trip Review, Data and Information Capability. You responded to the generic letter by letters dated November 7,1983, June 1 and December 28, 1984, and February 28, 1985.

We reviewed your response to ensure that you have the capability to record, recall and display data ar.d information which will pennit diagnosing the causes of unscheduled reactor shutdowns and for ascertaining the proper functioning of safety-related equipment. Based on our review of your submittals, we have concluded that your post-trip review data and information capabilities are acceptable for Item 1.2 of the generic letter.

Our review noted that the parameters which you monitor and record do not match those identified in the generic letter. While we have found your alternative parameters acceptable, our safety evaluation notes that recording of specific additional parameters w~ald serve to improve and expedite post-trh reviews.

I urge you to give careful consideration to this aspect of our etaluation.

A copy of the safety evaluation is enclosed.

Sincerely.

Original Signed BF Robert B. Samworth, Sr. Project Manager Project Directorate 111-3 Division of Reactor Projects - III, IV, V and Special projects

Enclosure:

As stated cc w/ enclosure: See next pa e P LA PD33:PM

/ PD33:D P, trer RSamworth/bj gJHannon

// /6 /90 g/fy/90 p' //[/90 j

Hr. C. W. Fay Point Beach Nuclear Plant Wisconsin Electric Power Company Units 1 and 2 cc: Ernest L. Blake, Jr.

Shaw, Pittman, Potts and Trowbridge 2300 N Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20037 Mr. Gregory J. Maxfield, Manager Point Beach Nuclear Plant Wisconsin Electric Power Company 6610 Nuclear Road Two Rivers, Wisconsin 54241 Town Chairman Town of Two Creeks Route 3 Two Rivers, Wisconsin 54241 Chairman Public Service Comission of Wisconsin Hills Farms State Office Building Madison, Wisconsin 53702 Regional Administrator, Region III U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Office of Executive Director for Operations 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 Resident Inspector's Office U.S. Nuclear hgulatory Comission 6612 Nuclear Road Two Rivers, Wisconsin 54241 i

l

-