ML20062E866

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Documents Reinspec Results of Four Recirculation Inlet Nozzle Safe Ends & Acceptability of Continued Oper of Facils Until Next Refueling Outage.Concludes That Continued Oper Presents No Safety Hazard to the Public
ML20062E866
Person / Time
Site: Brunswick  
Issue date: 12/08/1978
From: Utley E
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To: Ippolito T
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
GD-78-3264, NUDOCS 7812130115
Download: ML20062E866 (45)
v • d • e


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:3 4 N December 8, 1978 FILE: NG-3514(B) SERIAL: GD-78-3264 Mr. Thomas A, Ippolito, Chief Operating Reactors Branch No. 3 Division of Operating Reactors United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 BRUNSWICK STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT DOCKET NOS. 50-324 & 50-325 REACTOR RECIRCULATION SAFE END INSPECTION PROGRAM

Dear Mr. Ippolito:

The purpose of this letter is to document the recent reinspection results of four of our Unit No. 1 recirculation inlet nozzle safe ends and tne acceptability of continued operation for both units until our next refueling outages. summarizes the UT results performed thus far for both units. These results are stated in terms of the maximum magnitude found at any location on the safe end. The maximum indication occurred on the Unit No. 1 N2D safe end with a 78 percent of DAC magnitude. Based on a 10 percent of wall thickness calibration standard, this represents a maximum indication depth of 0.086 inches relative to a 1.1 inch wall thickness. As stated by our consultant, Mr. Ted Lambert, the effect of water in attenuating the response would be on the order of 1 db or about 11 percent of DAC. Thus, taking this into consideration, the maximum wall penetration could be as high as 89 percent of DAC for a maximum depth of 0.10 inches. A review of our design with respect to the Duane Arnold Energy Center's (LAEC) design indicates significant differences in stress level, wall thickness, and operating conditions. Specifically, the stress rule index for BSEP is 1.39 as compared to DAEC's 2.4, the BSEP wall thickness is approximately twice that of DAEC's, and the BSEP water chemistry history does not reflect a resin intrusion problem. For these reasons, the BSEP safe ends have a significantly lever probability of intergranular stress corrosion cracking occurrence than the original DAEC safe end design. A review of the BSEP safe end design by General Electric, which included the effects of seismic loads, indicated that a continuous 360* indication with a depth greater than 0.83 inches would be required to initiate a' safe end failure. Since the referenced maximum indication is not a continuous 360' indication and since its magnitude is small compared to 0.83 inches, the current maximun indi-cation does not represent a safety concern. Also, the design review concluded that a through-wall crack greater than 20 inches around the circu=ference would be required to initiate a failure. [ 781e139fljs- ~

m .1 Mr. Thomas A. Ippolito Daccmb:r 8, 1978 As requested by your staff, we are also enclosing a summary of pertinent information from the original code stress analyses for the safe ends as performed by CB&I. It should also be noted that information pertinent to the Unit No. 2 inspection is contained in the CP&L report " Reactor Recirculation Safe End NDE Inspection Program," which was submitted to the NRC Office of Inspection and Enforcement, Region II on October 9, 1978. In addition, a presentation was made to representatives of Region II, I&E, and Mr. Vince Noonan on October 16, 1978. Our recent reinspection of our Unit No. 1 ssfe ends after 50 days of operation concludes that no detectable change or propagation of the indication is occurring. Based on this and the above review of the safe end design, continued operation of the Brunswick units until their next refueling outages does not pre-sent a safety hazard to the public. Yours very truly, M[05{.ySN y Senior Vice President Power Supply EAB/mf Enclosures

i t t SUW1ARY OF UT RESULTS BSEP REACTOR RECIRCULATION SAFE ENDS Nozzle Unit No. 2 Inspection Unit No. 1 Inspection Unit No. 1 Reinspection 9/21/78 9/27/78 11/18/78 A Five spot indications Intermittent linear maximum 14% DAC indications - maximum 10% DAC B Seven spot indica-Low level inter-tions - maximum 14% mittent linear indi-DAC cations - maximum 9% DAC - random 3600 C Linear indication Spots at 3600 - 14% DAC 20% DAC maximum D 18% DAC indications Indication from 9:00-Indication 9:00-12:00 intermittent 3600 12:00 maximum 78% DAC <78% E Two spot indications Intermittent 3600 Intermittent 3600 average 10% DAC maximum 31% DAC maximum 33% DAC F Linear indication One indication - 9-12 with transducer 8% DAC at reactor end of larger taper - 10% DAC G Spot indications Two spot indications average 10% DAC - 8% DAC maximum 16% DAC H Spot indications One spot indication average 12% DAC - 7h% DAC maximum 16% DAC J None Intermittent 3600 Intermittent 3600 maximum 30% DAC maximum 40%'DAC K One indication - Intermittent 3600 Intermittent 3600 Possible signal maximum 43% DAC maximum 48% DAC from ID of S/E

a i ClitCAGO BRIDGE a IRON COMPANY OAK BROOK ENGlHEERING SECTION S8 STRESS ANALYSIS NOZZLE N2A/2K, RECIRCULATION INLET ~ A.

SUMMARY

OF RESULTS The area replacement calculations are shown on pages S8-35 through S8-40. In accordance with Par. N-451(b) of Section III of the ASME Code, the area replacement calculations assure satisfaction of the requirements of Pars. N-414.1, N-414.2 and N-414.3 in the vicinity of the opening. A stress analysis will be performed for the nozzle with the temperatures calculated in Section T8 combined with the appropriate pressures. The KALNINS computer code will be used to calculate the stresses due to pressure and temperature. The stress model to be used with the KALNINS program is shown on page S8-5. The results of the stress analysis will be used to sat-isfy the various requirements of Article 4 of Section III for points not adjacent to the vessel wall. These C results will also be used to show that the thermal stress intensity, including gross but not local struc-tural discontinuities, is less than 1.5 S, within the reinforcing area. For points adjacent to the opening, in accordance with Par. N-451(b), the requirements of Par. N-414.4 can then be considered satisfied and fa-tigue requirements will be evaluated by application of i the " Stress Index" method of I-610 and the calculated thermal stresses. l sobiece 21A" BWR VESSEL c.e e. ' - ' De ref/n/Us, w she_L._ or._SJL e, es ce Checked by JH Date De e. -'I * 7 Rev.No. R e v.N o. Dose Rev.No. Dove

i i Ctil'CAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY OAK BROOK ENGINEERING The maximum primary general membrane stress intensity (P,) for the 1565 psi design pressure in the Inconel portion of the safe end is 13,972 psi at point 3; the 3 maximum P in the 304L portion is 12,475, compared to m 13,150 allowable. The values are tabulated on page S8-32. The Code allowable for the safe end material, S,, is 23,300 psi. The maximum primary general mem-brane stress in the low-alloy carbon steel forging is 13,717 psi; the Code allowable is 26,700 psi. The stresses due to the specified nozzle loads are calculated on pages S8-6 through S8-19. The maximum primary local membrane stress intensity (P ) due to g pressure plus nozzle loads in the safe end is 18,389 psi, less than the Code allowable, 1.5 S,= 19,725 psi (S8-17). The maximum primary local membrane stress intensity for the nozzle forging is 25,021 p s i', less than the Code allowable, 1.5 S,= 40,050 psi. The stresses in the vessel wall at the junction with the nozzle have been calculated using the methods of WRC Bulletir 4). 107, Ref. 13, and computer code 620-N. m,tiraum stress intensity due to the noz-zie lo d.,.<,s,m on page S8-40 is 1,895 psi. l In meeting the requirements of Par. N-414.4 the aver-age temperatures from the TEMAPR program have been used, excluding the radial gradients as indicated by the Code. With radici gradie.ts excluded, the maxi-mum range of primary plus secondary stress intensity l (Pg+Pb + 0) for the Inconel material is 65,850 psi at point 9 for the steady state and cold start transients. Subisce 218" BWR VESSET Ceae. #'-'Y Does ey .TT sh, 7 o# H e e4 on Checked by Jfi Dore

  • ' /'
  • R e v.N o.

Does 'A' ' R e v.N o. ' Daro Rev.No. Date

' ' CHICAGO BRIDC; & IRON COMPANY OAK BROOK ENGlHEERING t This is less than the Code allowable (3 S,) of 69,900 psi. For the SA-508 Class II forging material the corres-ponding maximum range is 33,115 psi; less than the 80,100 (3 S,) Code allowable. Additional KALNINS runs were made with the linear radial gradients included. Peak stresses were added to the appropriate KALNINS results and a fatigue analysis was performed in accordance with Par. N-415.2 { of Section III of the ASME Code. The usage factor calculated for the Inconel safe end is.634, for the low-alloy carbon steel forging it is .261. Because the radial temperature gradients were not in-cluded in the range of primary plus secondary stress intensity, a second fatigue analysis was performed in accordance with Ref. 22, Plastic Fatigue Analysis of f Pressure Comconents by S. W. Tagart. The usage factor calculated in this manner for the points where 3 S, is exceeded is less than the.634 above. 4 ( r i s.6,.., __ 21 8 " BWR VESSEL c.... I r'. C -/ o...

o... ? -'. ? a... w., _

s, r 5%,_2 _.e e: i.on ch. k.a by JH o... ~/' i n.. w._ f. o..._ n.,, w.,

o... _

N CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY OAK BROOK ENGINEERING B. STRESS MODEL Stress calculations were performed using KALNINS com-puter code. The stress model considered for these analyses has exactly the same dimensions for the noz-zie as the temperature model with corrosion allowance removed, but the cylindrical reactor shell is replaced by a spherical shell. The sphetical shell has a radius of 1.5 times the cylindrical shell radius; thus, the membrane stress resultant is P x 1.5 x RCYL/2 =. 5 PR CYL* This is the average of longitudinal and circumferential resultants in the actual cylinder. The stress model con =ists of 9 parts. The cladding has been included in the stress model by using the multi-layer capability of the KALNINS program. The stress model is shown on p' age S8-5. 4 e ( s. s,,6;.., ?19" nwn v m rt

c... - ' ' Do.. Th2h3 s, JT sh, 4 or R_

~ o es os Checked by 3M Dove ' !# # ' Rev.No-9 ' E *. ' # Rev.No. Dos e - Rev.No. Doce _ Do te ~ i

e o m.,=- N.! / i:.I ,.u . 7, . :le.3 O // I.: i s ... -il 2: t

  • d j s,

-: *: 2 a. s. a I I II IN II ll! ) - { e. fI i ' sf ~ E 3 4.

  • * ".. j l[)

. {. I,' ', {i ] P LI, I t., I, w*.. i g* i Is' a e 6

  • q6
    • n f i f ' (.

l <st

  • I4I-

--$ ~ J e t l i .-.x I 1 e l 4:. :I t $ E i., r,r t i l 7 j i E T N8 E: Fl

l 'G %

i g\\n i s u- { qI 3 / h t a es 5 8 g :13l I I EH a e }! i

E 5

i I* 51 o 1 .c, ea y "a7 I )

',ilCAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY OAK BROOK ENGINEERING '.. CA L. C UU DON OF STRESSES NUE lo blO22LE LOAD.S l0001 (D I 35.4 F= 7.8" M = 271 on ic,p x x F7 = 7. B " M - 27/., A,ps y i 3 3 Fa = 8. Z Ms = 513 is k,y. I31.12 5 [ran' { i Y 1 135.937.7 -$ rom $ 7 _.2 L34 4.325 be _I i I _4 4 128.0 hrom h 9 J Lu t h e w a ~ .E w o 4 ON 2 O N m n: 4 il l tt Lt.* k' f gy 3-l w 2Y 6'//R C.,,,f r.>y n o,,,T"/7, Tj 3s, 6,, S ? s,,6i.. . se ao Checked by-JH o,, er/ r.a 3 o,,, & /,,,,,,, g_.,u,. - ~ ---

1 i CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY OAK BROOK ENGINEERING i Section "l-1", Integral Thermal Sleeve i fj Area = f (12.75 2 2 11.507 ) 23.681 ina = 4 i S=.098175 .090175 e 68.48 in' = d

12. 5 i

O

~.

1 M 230 + (135.9375 - 1.06.25) 20 = 823.75 in-kips = X 4 1 i Bending stress due to M = 823. r- = x 8. 8 = 12,029 psi ! [- Direct stress due to F = = g 23 6 = 844 psi t j; If we place a support at R = 113.5 c - 1 Mll3.5 = 230 + (113.5 - 106.25)20 = 230 + 145 = 375 in-kips I 6 r*

  • j l'

Themomentatthefixedend=-hx 375 = -187.5 in-kips 'N' f i i s.,6;e, 1R3" nwn vrs9er c,, r'/, m e ,,12n'g,s, o yn 3s, 7,,_ g g c eos Checked by 3" Date M/I' U De ee 7-'#fI R e v.N o-3 Re v. No. Date Rev.No. Don.

CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY OAK BROOK ENGINEERING E ] Bending stress due to M x -187.5 x 10 8 x =7= 68.48 2740 psi = i l 0 r375,(. 3 r f-Q X= 135 9.M 4 E=0 ' x = ll3.5 5

e. b j

M,__, day } q EI d(2 i w 7 ~ J M=M -Rg( g 9 L l, (M -R O= g g J 4 O I RA (2 3 U i E (Mg&- 2

1) " d

+ 9 i o [MA( Rg (2 4 m y d' + + EI ( 2 6 1 2/"Y i 9 LJ Ou .l . u sobi.e. 219" BWR VESSEL ceae. ' ~~0 i. & s, JT sa, o or so .. c o ch.ek.a by 17 1! _ o... W// '* *l R o w. N., b D. te ' R. v. N.. Det. R e v.N o. Dave

CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY OAK BROOK ENGlHEERING y (0) =C2=0 MM Rd g g y (L) = + CL=0 ~ 2 6 y 2 RL y ' (L) =ML- '+Cy=0 g 3 RL 2 ML + CL=0 g y E-2 3 -M L RL g g r- + 0 2 3 Le t' i IM L2) 3M 3 A*]iA i* A i2 ) 2L 3 x 375 A

  • 2 x 22.4375 =

ps t [- Reaction at support = Rg = -4F kips Maximum direct stress = 2740 + 844 = 3584 psi se6ie,,_ 218" BtG VESSEL c 0' ' -> De,ef t/f/.'ro, 3? ss,1er1 C es os Checked by_ JII Deee " Re v.Ne_ Does Y 'a' ' Rev.No. d Dete_ R e v.No. Do,e t

CHICAGO BRIDGE & 1RON COMPANY OAK BROOK ENGINEERING l 8 Direct stress = E' /A = 20 x 10 /12.21 = 1638 psi g 3 Bending stress = ' 148.4 x 10 = 4005 psi = F t-Shear stress = nr t " w (6. 21 5 .3125) = 4095 psi r-Maximum direct stress = 1638 + 4005 = 5643 psi T = 4095 psi 84 r 5643 2 S=2 + 40952 8190 psi <.5 S,= 11,650 psi = Section "l-1", Safe End i. Area = { (15 2 2 12.75 ) 49.038 in* = r l (15 " .098175 I = 186.32 in" S =.098175 = d 2 o

  • .5 S, allowable stress intensity criteria has been used because pressure stresses are not included.

l so6ie,, ?l8" BWR VESSEL e,,,,. 'N 'v n,,, / /p!'ay JT she_ll.or M sa os Checked by 3M Dee. I "' R e v.No-De te

  1. # R e v.No.

Does R e v.N o. - Date

CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY OAK BROOK ENGlHEERING nFy YY i ) 4 [ / > Fr i M. ME i i k k F = 7.8 (nozzle) + 25k (sleeve) 32.8 = Y F = 7.8 x F = 8.2k + 20k k = 28.2 z M = 271 in-kips (nozzle) + 187.5 in-kips (sleeve) = 458.5 in-kips x i M = 271 in-kips Y M = 513 in-kips z Direct stress = F /A = 28.2/49.038 x 10 8 = 575 psi I. s.,bie e, 218" nwn v:ssEr, c,,f.> ey n,,,12/ % n, JT ss,_12 es sc o n Hoo Checked by JH D a v e '* "* ' / #-' R ev.No. De ee ?? ' G Re v.No. - Does Rev.No. Date

CHICAGO BRIDGE f. IRON COMPANY OAK BROOK ENGlHEERING Bending stress due to M 4 0 2460 psi = = = g y 2 M Bending stress due to M =[= 0 = 1460 psi Combined bending stress = Y1460 + 24602 = 2860 M Shear stress due to torsional moment, Mz"A E (49.0 ( 375) = 1507 psi F* or F Shear stress due to forces F or F = g rr t E due to F 32,800 = y n (6. 9 3 75) (1.125) = 1338 psi due to F = g tr (6. 9 37 1.125) = 318 psi Resultant stress due to (F + F ).= Y318 2 + 13382 = 1375 psi Maximum possible direct stress = 575 + 2860 = 3435 psi sobi... ?1R" 997 vr' e wr. ce,6 >_ 2., -, De,e/2/rnta, a- _ ss,,11_ e,_fj_. < se os Checked by JII _ Dose 'I'II' R e v.N o. D e,e ' ' * ~ R e v.No. - De,e Rev.No. Dave ~

-CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY OAK BROOK ENGlHEERING Maximum possible shear stress = 1507 + 1375'= 2882 psi Stresses Due to Design Pressure, 1565 psi 1565 x 6. 375 " ' 4434 psi or 0

  • 4 = PR

.c = = 2.x 1.125 PR 0

  • I " 1565 x 6.375 1.125 8868 psi

= s. / Maximum Stress Intensity e c, = -3435 psi 0 = 8'868 psi 0 40 = 882 psi ~T D 2T,,x = 2 ) + 2882 S = 13,586 psi max = 2 SB-166 material at 575'F, S,= 23,300 psi 13,586 < 1.5 S, = 34,950 psi e The most conservative value for primary local membrane i stress intensity is obtained by assuming that the me-j ridional stress due to pressure is zero and the nozzle loads act to give the maximum possible negative L.eridio-i nal stress. 5 6;e., 21R" nMR VESSEL c.ne.(L 4e" De,e/I/d4sr JP s h e.lL..I _El_. O eson Checked by JM _ Date If ' Re v.No. O Date ' ' '-l 4 Re v.No. ? Date .,Rev.No. Date

f CH1CAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY OAK BROOK ENGINEERING Section "3-3" at Safe End, 139.125 from g i Area = -{ (13. 007 - 11.507 ) = 28.88 in2 2 2 f-i 3.007" 11.507 S= .098175 83.70 in8 = ( 13.007 / f r -- t Direct stress = F /A = 8 = 284 psi g i. 2 ,000 Bending stress due to M or M = 3237 psi = x t. Combined bending stress = 3237 6 = 4578 psi M Shear stress due to torsional moment = = 28. x 128 E 2898 psi = 1 Shear stress due to forces F or F = x y x x 6.12 x.75 = 40 psi 'L. Resultant stress due to F +F = 540 /T = 764 psi x y Subi.c, 218" BWit VESSEL C ae. N N Dei. '?*//'a y JT she.15 t_S_1._ i noo ch.ek.d by J!! Deve ?'/ ' ' R.v.No-O D o ne ' ' ' R. w. N o. Doe. Re v.Ho, Dave

CHICAGO BRIDGE & 1RON COMPANY OAK BROOK ENGlHEERING Maximum possible direct stress = 284 + 4578 ='4862 psi Maximum possible shear stress = 2898 + 764 = 3662 psi Stresses Due to Design Pressure, 1565 psi i 1565 x 535 c4=- = - 6003 psi or 0 = g l o, = p = 1ses y >sas = 12,00e psi t-t i Maximum Stress Intensity i e a& = -4862 psi t 6 = 12,006 psi e h t' !. s ~ &8 = 3662 psi T t 2f(12006+4862 2 s = 2x + 3662 2 = ( max max 18,389 psi = 2 See footnote on page S8-14. Sobiect 219" BWR VESSEL Cent / /> W / Dee.W'M'By 3"' shelor ? ? osom Checked by JH Dove D-/ / '* ~* Re v.No-Do se [' ' ' R e v. N o. I* Do'o Rev.Ho. Does

CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY OAK BROOK ENGlHEERlHG Allowable stress intensity for SA-182 F304 L material at 575'F, S,= 13,150 psi. Allowable stress intensity due to pressure plus nozzle loads is 1.5 S,= 19,725 psi > 18,389 psi. Section "4-4" Forging I 1. Area = { (15. 5 - 14.125 ) 2 2 2 32 in = a 4. f (15. 5 " - 14.125") S=.098175 =.098175 113.4 in' = d _5 o I M = 458.5 + 32.8 x (135.9375 - 128) 718.9 in-kips = x d* M = 271 + 7.8 x (135.9375 - 128) = 3'32.9 in-kips y r-N F = 32.8 y 1. F 7.8 = x l' F = 28.2' i z M 513.in-kips = 2 Direct stress = F /A = 28.2/32 x 10 8 g 881 psi = 9 i l 5 biect NIR" "I M V" 9 9 ? Cene.N '- WDese /NN'? By JT Sh el.2_,. o f.O.S,_ c es on Checked by JH Dove-(/ ? ' ^ Re v.N - Deee' ' ' ~ Re v.No. Dee. Rev.No. Date

CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY OAK BROOK ENGINEERING f Bending stress due to M 718,900 y 113.4 6340 psi = = 6. Bending stress due to M = 332,910 113.4 2936 psi = Combined bending stress = Y6340 2 2 + 2936 = 6987 psi i. T,- z 513,000 Shear stress due to torsional moment = Ar " 32 x 7.40625 e G = 2164 psi 7.. '4 Shear stress due to F 32 800 = y n x 7.40625 x.6875 = 050 psi I' 80O' r-Shear stress d'ue to F x x 7.40625 x.6875 = 488 ps'i = x r k Resultant stress due to F, + F =Y2050 2 + 488 2 2107 psi = y l' 1 Maximum possible direct stress = 881 + 6987 = 7868 psi Maximum possible shear stress = 21'07 + 2164 = 4271 psi t.. I i l r-9 Subiece 71 9" WR VFSEEE Cent.

  • f '" Doe.

By JT She M el f _ o eson Checked by JH Date "I' I I '* S . R e v.No - O-Doee ^ Y Re v.No. Dese_ R e v.No. Date

CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY OAK BROOK ENGINEERING Stresses Due to Design Pressure, 1565 psi = PR 1565 x 6.875 7825 psi or 0 o = 4 2t 2 x.6875 = PE = 1565 x 6.875 15,650 psi o .6875 = O t Maximum Stress Intensity 4 = -7868 psi c I 0 = 1,650 psi c / L. 1 [' T40 = 4271 ps'i 15650 + 7868 2 S = 2T =2 + 42712 25,021 psi = r. max max 2 r i 1.5 S,= 1.5 x 26,700 = 40,050 psi I' l -. See footnote on page S8-14 I i i l 1 l l s,bi.,, 218" BWR VESSEL Ceae. O' ' " ' Doe. e ,,, !. -* Rev.No- -' Do ve **- By 3'" SheM'_of 5E & ss on Checked by UN Doee " Re v.No. -- Dose R e v.N o. Dave

CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY OAK BROOK ENGINEERING C. PRIMARY STRESS INTENSITIES A KALNINS run was made for the design pressure case to determine the primary stresses. A pressure of 1565 psi was used for the nozzle flow path and 1250 psi for the forging. The stresses for the design } pressure case are tabulated on page S8-27. The pri-mary stress intensities are shown on page S8-32. The maximum primary stress intensity in the Inconel portion of the safe end, SB-166, is 13,972 psi com-pared to the 23,300 psi allowable. The maximum P, in 304L is 12,475 compared to 13,150 allowable. i s e f * ( t r-s biece-219" RNR V:'e c 't ceaer'" r. a n o,,,i2 M.; s .T P sh, M or c9 r ( te co Checked by .T M Dove '/ '

  • b \\

De te. '- * '* /

  • R e v. N o.

R e v. No- '" Dee. R e v.H o. Dave

CHICAGO BRIDGE & 1RON COMPANY OAK BROOK ENGINEERING D. PRIMARY PLUS SECONDARY STRESS INTENSITIES Stress runs were made for the following transient conditions: Design hydrotest, 1250 psi Steady state conditions, 1320 psi in flow path Startup transient at 253 minutes, 1320 psi in . flow path Startup of cold recirculation loop at.56 r. minute, 1320 psi in flow path \\ I The resulting stresses are tabulated on pages S8-27 through S8-30. These stresses were input to the PRINCESS program and the range of secondary stress ~ intensity determined. The stresses due to the noz-zie loads, tabulated on page S8-31, have been added to the range of transient stresses, and the result-ant maximum range of primary plus secondary stress 7 intensity is tabulated on page S8-33. The maximum range is 65,850 psi at point 9 on the stress mode'l for the steady state and cold startup transients. r k. E r 9 subi.ce 71R" W~4 VESSEL c.ae.67-'b " D.e n^be <TT _ 5 ke.21_.LS.E_ r t, sa o s Checked by iM _ Dave ' ' ! i ' R e v.No- ~' I*'f * 2 R e v. No. Dose R e v.No. Defa Date

CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY OAK BROOK ENGINEERING -b Point' v4 To y. 7g, 1 2 I 3 1 1 l Y R2 S - /2C0 5 59 ci m3 7 4131 1 O ize __ jgg y 5'I5\\ l 080C 7 8 \\ SM* 2 187. - 12ED 1 s u a g K657 9599 g, i l., 3'l87 9b99 -J25] y IT 18 g i3 6y $3'lO 6 ao -2 E61 33l3 _jgg4 q 2%I 4925 - 72 Sa fo llE'iD 7902 -/7Sc ll 2t , zy, fp -399/ 2145 r 13 71 1992 - ) 2 50 14 - ?'} }9'l9 /2.50 is-7'}99 2DSb /2s u 231z 4566 l? 2%S 2579 ~/2So '~' REcmcul.hTloN INLET I250 PSI PRE 55GHE TEST 19 251z 9ss.y -l7cs 20 , 5 911 27s g pi /2530 li3f ~129\\ 412 29-:f ? l 27 l '?/ 8 " S WP c,,,,a. y,,,,,f3/g,,r,jjj ss.,,r l s.6i... -o j =... cs. a.a 6, u n.e,,, ,,,,,, 3 ,,,,c,,.,,,,,,,,,. o l [ d

CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY OAK GROOK ENGINEERING b Pointll vy _Q_V',-].Tp_p__.) 1 2 3 -<E 4 1 146I2. - 4737 - loor i-5 I 2 [3#42 -5'77 l i l l _z 4648 2IOLD -I O05 i _l l 7 8 l 4 l3tO(o l 20&IO N i l 11/40. lI'llo -loos! 1 o l/ /2 5 t i 13 g - 4459 '122) - I g g y 558(o ! & &5 6 i-1o0 5' 7 16 j l I i 1 j i q is g -\\255'4674 \\ l ~ 1 6 zo i 9 -2794 i 2854 l -l005'; I i 27 93, 4 4 74 : -1005-l. i fo (10390 6676 -IDOS 2, , z2, n i. i fp l'-4532 2350! j ~ I-f 3 ' - 1815 f.8 88 -loo 5- ' - - r i 1 /4 l_,l 9 2 2001 -1005' ' i l jE ;-1434 4522 I-loos ' i l l is 9364.7654i. ~. \\' -9538 I37/ l-ICOS \\ 17 i I /g 17 f 70 ' 9203 ! Recrecut.nrion Imer \\1

-~ ~~ ~ ~

' ' ~ ' 19 l' 2 o 110 195LD !- loo t TSrenar Swe., 5% 'F 4954

15010, yo 1005 PSI Pressure li s

~ ~ ~ l i.; 12 75 0 //770.-1005.' pi ~ !i , 77 '17720 '13260,, ?!8 8lt'N c.., N > n - Yl.A su,2 5 u11._ s sge<e. D., Br o te en Checked by N a DeeeW" //

  • _ R o w.No-Dee[ ' ' ( Rev.No.

Deee Re v. H o. De,.

C.HICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY OAK BROOK ENGINEERING \\- Point,1 T4 V~o W' T4o l 1 2 15: 3 4 y l 41h -4509 -- /00 5 l 5 0 l '5 HL _432) ,2 1 9171 2003o y _jgjg 7 8 3%o I1990 \\l \\ \\ \\ 10 litolo -/005 7 3 // /2 5 - Si te z. 7219 l ' I3 I" GGA 6943 joor y . I& q, ,g g {~l2 43 M 6' 20 9 -l'f 19 El10 - />M ! Y '4. 3 013 - /ocs jg SW V'c3 -lccC - %'11 315'l ,7 f3 '73 3 1M5 _ jooy 6 ,4 923 -foos l ~\\452 %IS ~,cos l ,g ~ j asa me ,o -1790 l151 lc o s' ,y ,g 11:00 355+ REC /RCUL ATIO// IHL ET START UP TnA lls/Eur 19 I'*h '9 - > =W NO 8ADIAL G-R AblEIAT pg , 53G4 / si2.o pj 1359 9743 - /;crl I 4 '* Z' IOC70 72 Su bj e c t--- b b Doe b She b of[_,. Cone. # '" ' -' By- ~ D a e * / es is os Ch. eked by - ' e R e v. N o. Da te ' 'I " " Re v.No. Does Re v.No. - Date

CHICAGO BRIDGE & 1RON COMPANY OAK EROOK ENGINEERING b Point,! Yq V~e 9^, l Tp o 1 2 q 3 4 2

44/r T71

-loos ! 2 _So9s 417 45901 l6o40 i A ~IO05 1 7 8 sitt freio s r N i FN 2955 -log ! 9 o lf f2 g 495G 9?f3 l c I3 lo 23 2') _I-joog, ) SL8 (5 14 i 0Y A l l If, 18 g 4 ao l - 41890 11300'-jooS l ~' q i Y/2?O H3510. ycoq ! ,o 3IH ~3 'Z '!OO 2r ,21 -26 G20 -)%Iof l i ~ f7 - T10 280bk -j, o g. l 13 o l g_ _ __I 4 ~1') O8 % 30!-1005 i .../C_ _. ~..k_..i3 . 3sz2.,; l i -2 2 1-/00C. - fg , l SWo l l -. /31' 10-. '-14 -loos l- /7 I i RECTRCUL ATIOM IMLti ~~ 856! in ?)o 90

  • ~ ~ ~ ~ ' " ~ " ' ~ ~

l START UP 0F Cato Loop 19 , !! 2o I??2*I-loo 5 No Rnoint Gar >DzrNT 99ss i.syso ; po = --: I IIlYic h200: .- p i .p p / S 3 70 13B0 i l '2I 8 " B WR o aa ch.a.a 6, J o.. 7 / c./' h...u.. e. o,, :- e,,,,,oy,,,,,{l3/g,, j//,,,, 75 *, e 1.s;., _7. ,......,y,,

6 d.flCAGO CRIDGE & IRON COMPANY OAK BROOK ENGINEERING -4 Point!\\ v y V^p V, l 7g o l }/5l-1 9/5 2.200 5 6, '7 /94 9 7575 '716 2 475 -s/5 m /997 2463 7 8 j N / 0/ 2 MSZ 3/5 I s ,1 n 12 l d 3 i /, /2.33 2 off 3 g /6/7 I 5-7) - 315 y i ils 2D /ON 17 18 g !?; zo 2010 175f - 8}5 q - 3/ 7 '/O f fo -/8 33 04 2r .zz 12 1E 33 /f30 /3 b 09/ 3 763 .3/f 85% 2&l7 14 /g- /57 437 /4 -/57 3'/ 6 /7 2 /7 203 ~' Rse mC UL ADOM IN L..n r 315 PST AP On Fiow 19 53(o 2+7 _;p -38L /6 D '# ~4-7 -23 p/ 22 A7 5 I 7i e" swe

c... e c.

v o.,73/69, /// sse l t., -

3. y.,,

c Checked b y__.II Doe. 7/II/'l R...N o. Dove 't z f Rev.No. Dee. Rev.No. Dave o ** o s

} I + 5' CHlCAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY OAK BROOK ENGlHEERING -y Point!l V'q V~o V~,-l Tdo i 2 q 3 4 y l So5g 1i4oa -i m 6 6952 11'178 ,p 3 5059 I?1\\5 -l565 s. 6948 I3463 7 8 s 9 f, 4309 10894 -1565 g 6890 11643 g 5.604 3690 -1965 y I6 tl ll00 1984

  1. q

,g g -25i 9067 -1565 q 2544 9678 -\\250 ,o 94o2 ~ 1966 -1230 3 2 , 22. i -2156 A5IS l 12 l f3 6135 9135 -1569 264 4046 -123o ,4 l fg. 7636 8493 -125ol 21BF 6912. I u i 3782 l-1250 3082 j7 i 6760,9343 fg ~@ECTRCULATION [NLET ~ 993g 9 33; _,29o 'Desrw. PesssURE 5113 8941 po 12673 6611 -1250l 4 91 2959 l 22, s s;..,__ '218 " Svm

c...tW D.,?l69,.)ll su, 2 7, - :

s e sc *oe Checked by Deee '/I '! O R e v. N.. Do e b/ A SRev.No. Do,e Rev.No. Dave .. i,

l

  • CHICAGO BRIDGE & 1RON COMPANY OAK BROOK ENGINEERING b

Point' Q V~g 4 y,- g g-1 2 3 4 , E527 -2537 -1320 f 5 '2 1640 -2802 Lg 5564 23555 -13 2 o 7 q 4 4603 23273 1 i 1 o tt 12 5 12708 13812 -1320 f, -3226 926 5 l 93 5 7203 8249 -1320 .y (5 Ilo !?) is g -1524 57/8 6 zo q -184 4 608 -l320 /o ' 24 74 l 53'77, - /005" ' 854Z l II40 i i 11 ,-/CC5 i zo ,zz 1 i -26.94 l 38h 12 p l' 13 t' 5826 156 51 -I3?O 14 5 30 I.4098 -103 5 i i Is' '-I272 l 1759 -100E 9207 ] 8000 i s. 3 i - 9321 f /5'M,!-loo,T fj l I I i jg 17253; 9289 i RECIRCUMTION ]~ ET \\' 2049& l 19Ea7; -1005 M I' 19 ~ STEADY STATE S 4 (> 'F~ s 45 6 l15026l. yo .:}320 Ps' I IW FLCW A47W v: 12703! 1047 l-lob i ~ p/ i b

  1. M il 17767 122d l

.p., 1 u,.,_ '2 1 8 " B W R c,. P ~ _o.,? l69,_ J H,,,, 2 5., s n s o... - * '/ + n... u.. ci..a.a 6,. s,

o... T - < a...u..

o..._

n... u..

.o...

3, 3 CHICAGO GRIDGE & IRON COMPANY OAK BROOK ENGINEER!NG l t Poinf0 Vp V-y. l gdo 1 2 3 4 1 ! 5149 -2io9 -1320 5 '7 4994 -2l% 5187 22525 -1920 y I .s ,4997 22:'53 7 8 N l2188 13592 -152 0 ~ ,9 c u 12 g g, -2729 92l,3 ,3 ~l132 S33 -1320 9 i6 rl ~I3Ib E3I6 '7 18 R e! zo 1l91 3H4 -1320 q ~ ll01 3918 -1093 fo 7647 7ASI -103.6 2, ,zz 11 12 -l809 4 (289 13 Gl4 4838 -\\320 ,4 -97 2920 -loos fr -128I 5030 -!005 u 9193 8088 n 907.3 1354 -1005' 1(o983 8911 fg l?EClRCUL AYlDN T Er N! g g g(,3 Sranr UP TRANSEEW7 ~ 4978 193/o po N o h3?p I 41, CRa b I E W T I!4TH ~ ~ ~ ~ 13543 9740 -1005,l ~~2/ 'Parssure Incensur =~~ J2 1466~/ 100b-l 719 "/3 W P o,, 3/69 s,_ M su, 2 S,, s : 3 we., c,,,, c.,.y, a te os Checked by _ Deee 3//S/b R e v.N o-Da te. #.? Re v. No. Date Rev.No. Date

A+5 CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY OAK BROOK ENGINEERING b Poinf!l V-Vo 3 4 Cl% i i 2 g 1 5530 3074 -1320 0 '2 4593 2794 i 65/5 18535 -l320 p I t-1608 18295 7 8 4 y g o g- ,2 g ,52SG 10137 -1520 l 13 1 g 6189 11787 g 1.945 l 392o-1320l y Ils SJ10 4432 1. is g } h39260 2l054 -1320 q ! fl553 44495 -lbo5 ,o 21602 -2693 -1005 - 23232 -18080 ip 13 -8689 '3IS23l-1322 15108 33727 -1005 l1 ,4 -5886 -l836 '-l005 l ,g fg 12783 3868 } f7 i-IE9 5'3 -1143 -1005' f fg , 20753 86G2 REC lRCULATION TNLET

(4,g 1gog, _i0o

,9 START UP 0F COLD LCOP po 9549 15%G WO /?RDIAL GRADTEui-1 ,11923 11177 _ s oed, pf WITH PRESSURE.Tucemeur-l,g 4,, ,,,3g l' Subie c e C e.D. - ' Dee di 'D By $he et so eon Checked by } Date W 'I 9 Rev.No. De se[* ef Re v.No. Date R e v.N o.

Doe,

chi,CAGO BRIDGE &' IRON COMPANY CAK DROOK ENGlHEERING W Point V~- 3 4 V~4,,_f_.o_. _._T _o_.] f.. t 4 1 24.6&.2.,!.. M s.z_._ _ 2At&2 3662 l 7 3 24S62. 3342 j 14852 3652 a 7 a N' n 14962 : 3562 .a .1 0 // /2 I g I3 g, 24.!S2 5662. G l =- 'U 9 T4862 3642 /& 1] /8 R NAS05 d zo I 23584i EllO ,r 9 I ! 3 s 94, 2t/O fo J 1 3435 ~2 -- 8$ 1 2; , 2.2. f/ r ,2 1343s : 2862 13 2 2A 3 ' 4095~ p, L 15643; 40W ,4 4 0 IE-.. 27868 i A221 17/48, 9.__.71

42 fg

._.4221,,_ /7 __ 8.78! 3 e jg 17Eas, 4271 Recrecuarrou.Twer ~~~i ' ~ ~ ' ~~~~~ ~ ~ i_9 2756s - 4271 0 SrRESSES !)UE 7b '~' ~ t?! S 4271 yo 0. Mozate Lons 275ssi ! 4271 i n -. 22 t/f'. 3 4271 l ?ia" awe c.... m ~ o..?'/s v,, M,,. 3.)_., u .[..,cs..s..,7 o.... m m..... c.......

o...

L CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY OAK BROOK ENGINEERING [IllMARY' $7XEsi 1~urEU.ST7'IEs Fon DEsztw PRESwGE CASE l Porur

//venace Srws.s n srees.1 Zivreuszryle Vs i

%1 T,-. 11 A cioai f /))]1:,d / # 2. 6 002. //673 - 78 3 1247.5-l 13150 l' s S#1 60021 131 B1 - 763 13172 23300 t l 5600,' /2/67 ' -783 Si 6 12952 i 7(& , 3 3 5 2. ' 8037, - 7e3 882o i i l t 7 //0 1147, 5473 ' -14 08 6 ss/ I i l! t ////2 2623 i Gl96 - G2 s-6 B/s I i /.3 d N 3 21o, 4 901 -I408 6307 I. 49 Il ',! - 1703. -625 8328 i i IE?Ib l '7ll8 i4921 1315 l -ta25-9938 / i i p f r '/9 i20 &s4fo i cl402 -625 I0027 26 7ac> l ZI422 ! 6 54 4785, -62S ?I11 Y ,i l l 4 .a 7 ?lA 0WS - k, -lll ske ? .o_ s s;.a,

c.,:' '
  • O.,.

..... cu.a.a s, ir o... ? /n / m...~. o..

o.. J.

- > n...u.._ a o... ....u.. o.,.

CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY OAK BROOK PR/// CESS MECH. Psti,tenfv Secovurr ENGlHEERING Pori.ir ..-..REsars 1oxas srer s.Tur 2,gi;32 1cgges_. f 6548 6791 ZI 9 26 4' 39450 I 3is' l 2 ' &203 619/ 2)I96 !?-l50 1 2A 5 3 12439 8791 33&& ? <' 69900 IT2 4 11426 6 791 32063 I43 S ]606 8 79/ 24003 / $ 2-t. 6 246 8991 2l25'3 Id2 7 4827 8711 18447 IC2. 6 i 2&S6 8791 /6123 l 1l2 I 9 30157 5 s 3 6-6585D 2$4 10 227s0 ss3G 5/036 l.1d4 t. II 16 loo 4709 ' 38909 I'. 114 i l2 ll 891 6709 .30491 l 1/4 n 13 2.1094 9946 52134 3 i4 I4 I3866 1946 49679 1 54 15 6805 //6l3 25 223 4 is' L lis 6570 I/&l3 24753 4/5 !? IlOl3 II'4 I 3 33&39 3'4 18 10377 ll 613 32637 1 154 19 I 0 7s1 ll bl 3 33 Ils < 80100 J?2 (. 20 798 3 II t.13 27579 JE4 i i 21 ']2')4 ll413 2616 I Jf3 22 i 1207 Ilbl3 .30031 ( if4 \\' 2 iA " B Ivt? ff%,_ .Ji/ su,P.,

s.,;..,

\\a.... c>..a.a s,_7 c.,. Ali n e... u.. r. o... ? c... ~ o., n... u.. o...

a...n..

o... l

C'dlCAGO BRIDGE 2. IRON CCMPANY OAK BROOK ENGINEERING TRANSIENT NUMBER TRANSIENT NAME s. 1 Zero 2 Steady State 3 Startup at 253 Minutes 4 Cold Startup at.56 Minutes i j 5 1250 psi Hydrotest t. r. I 6 I i, e~ k t i.. t. t. e i l l i i 1 I Doe. g /,,*e,_ M 5.bi.c, ? ! 9 TU..?p typgg py 7-n $s, g,, g caos Checked by -T D.#. 4 /J /f a a g,,,g*^ De ee,- -.,. R.,,g., Dee. R...N p,, 1 >~ l

CHICA.GO DRIDGE AND IRON C e t'P A N.Y_ VESSFL OPEN!*G REINFMRCING PROGRAM ' ' G E N,9 p ',' PROGRAF 'S. 711-N ; DATE 1-2-68 ; BATA SHEET DATE 1 - 9. 6. 8....._.... CONTR. N9 NPA THRU N20 REC I,RCUL AT.10_N, J,NLE T, Ne ZZLE. INPUT DATA - GENERAL DESIGt; PRESSURE CPSI) ' ~ " ' "P 7 ~ I56 5.~ 0" ~ ~~ ~~~ ~ CESIGN TCPPERATURE COFGREES F) TEMP 575 = ERIAL SPECIr! CAT!ON F 9 R, VE S.S EL SWEL.L...: SA 533 CLASS 1 GR Ar'E 8 ALL CES!3N STRESS INTENSITY AT TEMPERATURE. SS _ FOR.O.W.ABLE 3.6. 7.0 0. C. vEn$EL SHELL (PSI) P ATE.R I AL SPEr f r ! CAT.. ION F..S R N_ 0 _Z.Z l. E.. :. e SA = S08 C L_A S.S.._2 ALL9WASLE DESIGN STRESS INTENS! Y T TEMPERATURE SN a 267CO.C FOR N072LE (PSI) m .... ' " E R_I A. L. _ _S P.E. _C.I..F I C. A _T I O.N ra -__f.R. S A F E EN.D=--: =. ,~ SB 166 6.J ALLOWABLF DESIGN STRESS INTENSITY FOR' SAFE ~END CPS I' ' ' ~ ~ AT TEMPERATURE SSE = 23300.0 '~ - ) e............. = _.. _ _ _. - MATERIAL SPECIF! CATION,FOR THQ MAL SLEEVE : n SB 166.. u r .. SAFE END CALCULATIONS CODE ; i.qEOO. ; 2.NOT RFCD. SCC e 2 r, q......__._....__.... SWT 35 c#~SS .a SUnJCCT 2l&"/ 8onWG W A 7"l~ R " T 'k*N G C n' " C0t.T !TW7EDi'T5 5)'!/fi Y 3 E r-. t i

  • * * * * * * ~ * * " " " ' " * ' * * " " - * * * * * " "
  • u

o .CH I C AGU.UR I D3C. AND.1R.8N COMPANT...... C O N T R.. NO. NRA THRU NOK_, R..E,C.I R._C UL A T I O N. I..NL F T.N. 0. 2 7.L E.__... _. _..... I t:PUT DATA GENERAL CORROS!0N ALLOWANCE !.kS!C.E. OF. .S. HELL ( !.N. )....... fR!S.= .. 0.0. 0 0.0 CURROSION ALL0 DANCE INS!7E OF,N0ZZLE (!N) ._..fR!N

  • C00_0.0

= CURRSS10fs ALL0hA*iCF OUTSIDE 9F_$ HELL J,1N) QR65 = e q312,5_._ C H R R O S I O.N A L L O W A N C.E D U T S I. DE.O.F.ts..S.Z Z L.E....(. !.N. ). C. R. O.N = .C.3.125.. CLAD THICKfJESS I NS ! DE N. 0 Z..Z L E..A..N..D/. O R VE S SEL .= _. C L.. =.... e l 87.5.0 SHELL (!N) OVE.RL AY...... C..OCE : 1.N9NE ; 2.SHELL 6NL Y J C0C = 4. CL AD OR I, " LAD EXTr e S AROUND INSIDE CPRNER OF N0ZZLE Y : 4-CLAD FyTFNDS ALL THE'EAY'TS"'S' FE END ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ' ~ ~" ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' a t La! M Ls e, Ig F L..~i....._.__ L 1 L I L w m w SHT 36 of SE SU3J.ECT Z.. l.f "d.....S.D.t.7 L I A/'a .~ s!/nr -- ~ n~ L ... O. N.T .P -h7/ D_A_TE.e r E *.Y. w"'~

ar p

CbECKEC BYJH ATEF Sg REv.Ne. A, BY .DATE L

w / C,H,1,C A G H,R R.I p C E A.N D I R '.i N CO.dPANY CONTif. NO.,f 2 A THRU f;P<, RF.C I RCU.L A T !,0N I,N L E T_ N 0 Z Z L E _..... INPUT DATA - N0Z7LF N0 Z Z L F,T Y P C, C 0 0,E,,:,,1. BARREL J 2-DOUBLE TAPFR .._.C1.3...,...._..1 N0ZZLE MATER!AL. CODE.._ ... =

1-FERR! TIC ' ! TH NO CLADDING CNM s 2

AT SAFE END JUNCTieN ; 2. ALLOY OR FULLY CLAD FFRRITIC. m INS!DL DI APE TER SF N0Z7.LE AT JUNCTION TS SAFE END~ CIN) DN!= 13 75CQQ'5h LENGTH O F ' Ne 7 2 L E ' D A R R EL" 4 AIAl.L'EI.-~T O Tie'Z Z'L'E ~~ IX!SCIN). H T'}'T ~~~~ '6 062 N0ZZLE WALL THICKNESS AT JUNCTION ~TO SAFE ENOCIN). To .87500 ENTER 7ERS IF'"IN. C D *VU T E'D" 'T H I C'K N F SI IS' b" B's U S E E ~ ~ ~ " ~ ~ " ~ N A7ZTL*"TbTCkNG5 ff %'TNFORC ING ClYJ7 $NTER T8TAL TN = 7 25000 Td1CKNESS INCLUDING CLAD AND/SR C94RDS!BN ALLOWANCE ANALYSIS. ESTER'ZFF8 1 F ' N S Y i L'E ' T H I C K' C S S I 5 ~ T'8 ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ - ~ F:E. D E T r. Rv ! NF D w DFS I G N. F 3 R D_S U B L E_ T A P E R.,N e Z Z L_E_S_ _ TN IS MEASURED PERPENDICULAR Te N0ZZLE AxlS. INSlDC"DI K"fYEDF EAUYLE DDIT 992Z1E ASURFC F D '.B = 00000 TO THE P RF. T ! C AL POINT 0F I N TER S FC T !')N OF INSIDE SLRFACE OF N622LE AND }KS f DE ' SI[RI ACE' 6'F VESSEL ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ SHELL t!N3. FOR BARREL A92ZLE ENTER ZERO. ~~ INS 10F AND SUTSIDE SL9PE FOR DOUBLE TAPEREO A9ZZLE PHI (DMGRTTICTF5W VMVE5"~~T'YPE N0ZZLE ENTER ZERS. 00000_ = ~~ INSTDE' RAD!US' V WSSEL~t!N3e R= 110 0C000 ~ ACTUAL SHELL TH!C< NESS INCLUDING CLAD AND/eR TS = 5 56250 CHRRBSISN ALLMaANCE CIN). c REOUTRED DLSI.CN T H I C.< NE S S O F_. S_HEL L..E_x_CLup !.tgi_.C L A Q._. _ T S R._= 5 27300 AND/PR CSRRSSION ALLOWANCE CIN3. N027LF INSICE C0%FR RAblVS CIN). FNTER ZERS !F R'i ' ' ~ ~ ~ f.'6U5 C ' s THIS IS To BF COPPUTED PER ASME CBCE SFCT{,0N_3 NBZZLE OUTG10L CORNER RADIUS (,I_N1. ENTER ZER8 IF,___ R2 =__.3 6P5.00 THIS IS T9 SE CP"PUTED PER ASME CODE SECTION 3 TRANSill0N RADIUS BETWEEN 65 DFG. SLSPE AND TSP R3 = 8*.6P500 SECT 1PN OF NP2ZLF IIN). ENTER Z E R S, i r T H,1,S_ t.S T O .. BE COWWTED'AER AS*E CEDE SECTION 3 ANGLE FROM VERTICAL VESSEL Ax!S TO Ax!S 8F VERTICAL BETA 00000 = NGZZLL IN VEGSFL HEAD,CDEGREES). IF N9T AP.PLICABLE ENTER ZERA. SWT 37 of SS SUBJECT 71?TP.FITD.7 TFErnberm CesT.c m7f DATEf,gg3O7-CHECxt: By .l u O ATE c/gj R E v.,N e, a _ _ _ _B Y., D A T_E_. = - - - = -..

...o v s . ~. - - C.HICAG4 B R.] p G E A N D 1.R...O. N.C e..M P A.N. Y....... v CONTR. NS..NP A Td4U N2O RE C ! R. C.UL A T } f)N.. I.N..L E.T. N O 2 7. L..E...... SUTPyT - N0ZZl,E N 9 Z.2.L. E. A N. A. L. Y..S I.S.. ~~ RE W!REW AUZILE M LC'TiffC5iEE'55 liOE T'd~fkTERIA ~ ~ '5 T~ - ~ ".'6 4 E ~ ~ T = PRESSURE AT jut.CTION Ta SAFE Eh.D. CIN) INCLUCES INSIDE AND SUTSIDE CORROSION'A[LOWANCE D'R' CLAD. ACTUAL N9ZZLE WALL T H 1'CkNE SS' XY JUN'CT I SN "TS S AFE ' ' - ~~ T= 8750C ~ END TIN) FIN!"UM LFNGTH OF F.0ZZLL AB9VE 45 OEGREE SL8PECIN)"" ~ ~ ~ '1PUTfD PIR C D W G. IC7C5305.-- ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ USE ThF GRFATER VALUE OF : EPC13 3 7. 9..4 2.7 = E2 (23 4 250q.C = RADIUS T? OUTStDE SF N0ZZLE FeRGING CINJ. Xa 17 7500C TOTAL REINF8RCING AREA RCOD. ON ONE S10E (SO. lN.3 AA A AC AT 3E 240Ei6. T.., B. ..s4126 00000 38 58182 + = HORI7 ENTAL LIP!T OF RE'!kF6RCtAUkT CIN3 ~ ~ ' - ' ~ ' - ~ ~ " ~ ' " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ USE THE LARGER OF ; , __,..,XSI.

,,14 12,50,C XS2

19 43750.. VERTICAL L!*li eF REINFSRCEMENT CIN3 XN = 6 12462 TOTAL RE!b.FSRCING AREA AVAILABLR ON ONE SIDE _.CS.O. IN.] ..... A 1 A2 A3 AR 7y 3 +... 6 94564 _s 3 + 2 86883 = 40 6899C _ _ = 3.H.T o. S8 SUOJf.CT 2/ (. c C.. G t I U.' TF# ..TACTC R .....C U N T. 6.E'dV 7/ O A TEf [ G Y,,;r (

, e s.* ... _ -. -.. -... -... ~.. -.. CHICAGH,PRIDGE AN.D !R9N C0t'PANY CONTR. N9 NPA THRU N24,.,RECIRCpLAT!aN.,1NLET NRZ2LE BUTPU.T-N0ZZLF ...- -.+ - HeR170NTAL Ll"!T 8F DE.INFOR.C_E. MEN..T. F e R. 2./.3...R E. I N. F O R.C.I..N G..X S

19. 3.4.1.4.7 AREA RECU!hEFENT CIM.

i. 2/3.F TSTAL RFINFPRCING AREA RE3D. BN......ONE ..ATT.= 25 72122 n . ~. .-...S!O..E.(GC.!...] i a J' TN T AL R E I NF '.uE l t.G WE A AVAILABLE.0N ONE SIDE FnR t, 2/3 REINF6RCING AREA REQUIRE"ENT [SO.IN.] _.86874 .. _36. 94554 + + 2 868A3 40 68311 = 3,.. S1*L" LENGTH UF F.0 Z Z L E B A..R.R. E.L... M E A. S.U.R_E D. P A R A L L E L.. .H. T 6 5.9.337 = N0Z7LE AXIb (IN). l. i I'.......__......_ .f

  • i.

I t. .u... t. )__.__.._. A i SHT 39 of SS SUBJECT ~ 2 /f,f Sc,TLDJ, CHECVED BY.lW" O' ATE yi[(l.*47E4 E4CTO CS AT.0 f-N7/ D A T e -/ HY

  1. E V..N e. C

'~D ~~~~~'3 ATE ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ^ ~~ 1

. i.* C A. .*,,.. l, \\. : ..... W. - e I. :i L *.+ a o A7 t.: es. .s av a s -.: 7 ~ S.A..3 ON -1v n <N ,J TI a- .CD; 14.094 0000 000 '~ D VL ~ VC MC ML 'MT' - -287.;0 E73:0 < C 3 0'. 4W'E3 30. 6V3350~. 51 3 0 0 0. ' ------ NX/P .UX/D NX/MC MX/MC' ~ ~'NX/ML' MX/ML 4 000.. 110 700. .. bo. . 50 - - - 086 0 .v ^ WP-77D K07MC tT67ML T07BL MD'/kL ~ 3 600 .150 ......500...... 100 .......1 800..- . 052 STRESSES AT '02 TO SHE.i JOT -.. g _. -. g.. r-SX -45 412. [70h. -1326. ~ 350 -62. ~ 1310 ~ -854 TSO 3777-- IE o. 1727 -1094. c61 T4 l'a'31 ; - H3 6.~ ~ -TAU' 109. ~~ 103.~ 44. 44. -40.~"~~ -40. ~~ ~193.'~~ 193 ~'S 473 -- 771c~ 'i758. ~- 1336.'- ~3 6 6.' ~ ~ 111 e~~~ ~ 18 9 5. ~ ' '1494 3 'i A *. Sl ES3ES AT '402 TS SHe.LL JCT t. SX tee. 190 1 *.4. 228 S9 22 ~- 313 '13B. "'"~ "'~-~~~ 197 TAU ' ~109 ~ 44 ~" -40.~ ~ ~ 193 v- [o M6 327 [31'. -"4 0 7. ' SZ2 E

  • tA;<
Ca t e, :s A

~'ECiAcutAT 3N Ih,LET ?SZZLE ONICA'S 3:IOOE

r. ' ; I Ci vP A'.Y SA< 0;Sc< E,ststg;ets0 OZZ i. '.SAO D' Ov CONT 9ACT c5-2*71 OATE 12/Cb/.29 OY J-T S EET 40 * '

I z.n _ _ C A....C A T I e %. __,,.,.T _r _s,, I M...:.../~~i....._.D_% _ 0 7 n wv uua m o :. a%-1 <N <d T RM C / 1 000 1.000 5 3760 112 761 1 650 ITT3 R5 T'l~ ~' n ~~ ~ ~. O C *, 14,394' ~ ~ ' ' e0000' 000 ~"" ~ " ~ P VL. .. yc _..... ..MC.. . M... MT L

c. 5 p e,.

c 7 :,. _ .s o.. 7 e...,. . cao.,. -..o. 6 0 a...aoo. b.13 0 c v, -. as ...NX/P M/,/P ' X /'iC.. . MX/MC.. .. NX/".L _... .MX/FL.. ..4 000 1M ~- ~~ ~~. 7 0 0 -~~-. 0 5 8 ' ~ ~ ~ " ~ 0 5 0 ' 086 -~~'40 6 q/r .q. /'4 u rr5746 .Nc/Mu M07ML ~ - - " . _. 3 630 _. ..150 _. _.. 530.... _.. _. 100 1 500 052. STRESSES AT N92 TD SmE.[ JCT ,7... . z, ... ___ g. ...._... C U --- ---- ~ ~ C L- -"-~ 0 U -~ " ~" 0 C- ~ g SX - -1703 1323 ~ ~ 45.-' ~-412 ' -1310 854.' - -350 62 s0 -T72a. 1M*. -a/=. .Go. -loal. ~f4'36. -761 - 1 a..- ~~~ " -~ .. T A U..... 109._. ._ 103 44. 44. -40 -40, 193'. 193 t S, 1823 ~~ 1371.' '" *29 745 ~ '1534. - ~-14'39.' 504. 394. _m l' MEMBRANE ST4ES3C3 AT NSZ TO SHr.LL JCT t. '" SX 90 <1 r.,2 '. -22o. -144'. j SG -313 -~~ ~, ' -22 -197 ~ ~ ~ ~ -135 TAU 139 44. -40 ~ 193 '~ S ',7 7 133 256 '334. { S Z Z E 'u *,'< : C.'. P. I N *. 4E: I40.LAT:?N I NL L T .'.S Z Z L E OdICALO B:103:. A '. ; 11 :'. 01 2 A *. Y e44 B'.2 0 0 < E '.G ; \\ C E ; ; '.3 92 2 :. L S O 2'. C Y'. C. T R A C T 2 4 7 1 OATE 12/0,5/49 OY J-T S-E.ET.'!! '}}

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20062E866&oldid=4455689"