ML20062C995
| ML20062C995 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Palo Verde  |
| Issue date: | 07/23/1982 |
| From: | Van Brunt E, Vanbrunt E ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE CO. (FORMERLY ARIZONA NUCLEAR |
| To: | Bishop T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| References | |
| 10CFR-050.55E, 10CFR-50.55E, ANPP-21472-GHD, DER-82-28, NUDOCS 8208050418 | |
| Download: ML20062C995 (4) | |
Text
-
N Docket Nos. 50-528/529/530 50.55(e) Report MMME Fd.TC4W GLTEIRPII@T.El @@f83225YF PHOENIX, ARIZONA t$ 3
!.[
3003 P.o. Box 21666 srA.
July 2p.,1982 ANPP-2'1472 :GHD/BSK U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region V Crockside Oaks Office Park 1450 Maria Lane - Suite 210 Walnut Creek, California 94596-5368 Attention:
Mr. T. W. Bishop, Chief Reactor Construction Projects Branch
Subject:
Final Report - DER 82-28 A 50.55(e) Report Relating to Joy Fan Blade Locknuts Undertorqued in Unit 3 Fuel Building Essential AFU By CTI-Nuclear File: 82-019-026 D.4.33.2
Reference:
(A) Telephone Conversation between J. Eckhardt and G. Duckworth on June 2, 1982 (B) ANPP-21208, dated June 16, 1982 (Interim Report)
Dear Sir:
Attached is our final written report of the deficiency referenced above, which has been determined to be Not Reportable under the requirements of 10CFR50.55(e).
Very truly yours,
\\
O A.-
Old 4
E. E. Van Brunt, Jr.
APS Vice President Nuclear Projects ANPP Project Director EEVBJr/GHD:db Attachment cc:
See Attached Page 2 8208050418 0
0 gDRADOCK0 PDR
/{ g T/
S2 -210
e.
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission At tent ion: Mr. T. W. Bishop, Chief ANPP-21472-CHD/BSK July 23, 1982 Page 2 cc: Richard DeYoung, Director Office of Inspection and Enforcement U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 J. A. Roedel D. B. Fasnacht C. C. Andognini A. C. Rogers B. S. Kaplan W. E. Ide J. Vorees J. A. Brand A. C. Gehr W. J. Stubblefigid W. G. Bingham R. L. Patterson R. W. Welcher R. M. Grant D. R. Hawkinson L. E. Vorderbrueggen G. A. Fiorelli Lynne Bernabel, Esq.
Harmon & Weiss 1725 "I" Street, NW Suite 506 Washington, D. C. 20006 R. L. Greenfield Assistant Attorney General Bataan Memorial Building Santa Fe, New Mexico 8703 i
e t
[
Y FINAL REPORT - DER 82-28 DEFICIENCY EVALUATION 50.55(e)
ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY (APS)
PVNCS UNITS 1, 2 & 3 1.
DESCRIPTION OF DEFICIENCY While performing verification of fan blade pitch in accordance with the Joy Manufacturing instruction manual. The Waldinger Corporation (the Project's HVAC Subcontractor) found various fan blade attaching bolts to be under the torque specified by the manufacturer. An additional sample by Bechtel Construction found that there was one (1) of twelve (12) bolts under-torqued (85 f t/lbs. versus 130 f t/lbs.) on the Fuel Building Exhaust Essential Fan.
II.
ANALYSIS OF SAFETY IMPLICATIONS This condition is evaluated as not reportable based on data provided by Joy Manufacturing Company, who advised Bechtel Engineering and The Waldinger Corporation that checking the blade torque values was not required and would produce no meaningful results. (See attached Telex, Joy Manufacturing Company to William Bingham).
III. CORRECTIVE ACTION Nonconformance Report MY-1286 will be dispositioned as use-as-is.
l l
l I
I l
g, m.uv
- c, Q
b 3.;{0DWNEY CALIFORNIA ff-
~
- Q 7, ;-
- f. -
g: ATTN o
.:q WILLIAM BINGHAM
- O 1 i
(:
f h
SUBJECT BLADE TORQUE VALLES AND THEIR VERIFICATION FOR JOY k8
.V XIAL FANS.
,t_
- THE FOLLOWING DATA IS BEING TRANSMITTED AS A RESULT O
- {
[3CALLOF6-1,032WITHPARTICIPANTSASFOLLOWSs
- 5
.; i e>
-g
- A)
BECHTEL' POWER CORP:
ZORAN MILATOVIC (DOWNEY) WM. BROUGH.
.~ ~ ' '
?t ';
- g':
ROB RANDALL. JOHN STREET (PALO VERDE SITE).
($.
- B)
JOY NFO CG:
NORINE ARNSTRONO. MANAGER OF QUALITY ASSURANCE.
l g::
FRANV PIETRO.
APPLICATIONS ENGIPEER - NUCLEAR FANS AND l
BARRY SCHOLLES. PRODUCT MANAGER - NUCLEAR FANS.
- )
-d.
.(J:
- 6. : JOY COMMENTS. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS:
- 0~
- A)
JOY MF0 CO HAS BEEN INVOLVED IN I.E.,
SAFETY-RELATED NUCLEAR
' '. I' FAN APPLICATIONS FOR 15 YEARS AND HAS ALWAYS CONSIDERED THE :g' l
SPECIFIC TORQUE VALUE FOR BLADE LOCKNUTS TO BE A NON-CRITICAL hN:
VARIABLE RELATIVE TO THE FAN PERFORMING.ITS SAFETY-RELATED g};;;..
CONCLUDED THAT JOBSITE CHECKING OF BLADE TORQUE VALUES IS FUNCTION.
IT IS WITH THIS FACT IN MIND THAT JOY MFO CO HAS
- gl a :.
g; ESSENTI ALLV NONPRODUCTIVE WORK WICH Y! ELDS NO MEANINOFUL
- l.: '
RESULTS REcATIVE TO THE FAN INTEORITY.
- g
.;I:
g:B)
ALL JOY hrs CO STEEL AND ALUMINUM FAN ROTOR ASSEMBLIES ARE g.-:
OVERSFEED tWHtRL) TESTED AT 125 PERCENT DESICN OPERATING f. PEED.
%g'};;::FOLLOWINGTHIS.
l ALL FANS ARE RUN. DURING THE TOTAL ROTATING _ ASSEMBLY :[.
BALANCING OPERATION. APPROXIMATELY ONE HOUR.SUBSEQUENTLY.
ALL i fj: FAN BLADES ARE' CHECNED BY HAND FOR TIOHTNESS AT JOY FI :g NAL INSPECTION.
- j.
g** ;; ASSEMBLY DUE TO LACK OF BLADE TORQUE.IT IS OUR CONCLUSIO IT IS MOST LIKELY TO OCCUR PRIOR TO SHIPMENT.
AGAIN THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE IN THIS PRE-SHIPMENT he
, TESTING PROCEDURE BETWEEN ALUMINUM OR STEEL ROTOR JOY FANS.
t
- g
-:C)
BLADE TORQUE VALUES:
THE FACTORY CRITERIA TOROUE VALUES AS o
Q{'.
CONTAINED IN JOY (F.W. PIETRO) TELEX OF 4-27-B2 TO ROB KISSELL:k OF WALDINGER ARE TO BE CONSIDERED NOMINAL VALUES THAT IS.
?,.
ANY FUTURE BLADE ANGLE RE-ADJUSTMENT OR BLADE TORQUING.
ON 5
THESE VALUES.
PLIJS OR MINUS 10 PERCENT WOULD APPLY.
THIS DOES NOT
- g. -:.
AFFECT OUR PRIOR CONCLUSION THAT THE TORQUE VALUES AS MEASURED
- ON-SITE.
k.*.
BLADE TORQUE VERIFICATION IS NECESSARY.
]$.
g.].'USEDFORSTEELpTORSISNL#tBER410STAINLESSSTEEL.
TN RESPONSEITO A QUESTION BY J.
qa :
dj E:.D-P..
w-y: TRAVEL OR SITE HANDLING Z8 CONSIDERED EXTREFELY RE
~
- 4.
v ALSO.
3 IN SUMMATION. JOY MFO CO CONSIDERS THE PRE-SHIPMENT OVERSPEED.
g,::ASSEMBLYINTEORITYTHANTHEINDIVIDUALRECORDINGO g ACTUAL VALUES.
p.4
-~
4..
- j..
jfkL x - _ _ _ _ _ - - -
hh" NY h*
' i' ~
5
- - - a --
- - -