ML20062C712

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Summarizes 781019 Meeting W/Mark 2 Owners Group to Discuss Staff'S Mark 2 Containment Acceptance Criteria,W/Attendees List,Meeting Handouts,Summary of Owner'S Position & Final Disposition of Criteria for Addl Review by Staff
ML20062C712
Person / Time
Site: Nine Mile Point, Susquehanna, Columbia, Limerick, LaSalle, Shoreham, Bailly  File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png
Issue date: 11/01/1978
From: Peltier I
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 7811130360
Download: ML20062C712 (37)
v • d • e


Text

, , . _ . . .-.. - - - - - - - - - - - ' - ~ ~ *

\ .: ,

'~ '

MRC PDR j f' S UNITED STATES y' '

n NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

)

{f' y $ WASHING TON. D. C. 20555 0 N

\..;...,/ NOV 1 1978 Docket Nos: 50-358, -352 353, 50-367, 50-373/374, 50-387/388, 50-410, 0-322 50-397 APPLICANT: Members of Mark II Owners Group i

SUBJECT:

MEETING WITH MARK II OWNERS GROUP TO DISCUSS THE STAFF'S MARK II CONTAINMENT ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA-0CTOBER 19, 1978

Background:

By letter dated September ~I4,1978, the staff infonned the lead Mark II ~

facility owners regarding criteria that the staff would find acceptable for Mark II Containment. The Mark II owners were asked to advise the i staff which of the criteria they would meet and, if there were any that they could not or did not wish to meet, how they plan to resolve the differences on a generic basis. The purpose of the meeting on October 19, 1978 was to provide opportunity for the owners to present the staff with

, the criteria to which they would take exception.

An attendance list, meeting handouts, a sumary of the owner's position

, and the final disposition of criteria for additional review by the staff j are enclosed.

Sumary:

} The Mark II Owners for the lead plants (Zimer, Shoreham and La Salle) took exception to a large number of the staff's load definition. criteria.

i The staff told the owners that a large number of exceptions was:an

' unacceptable situation because the staff does not have the resources and time to consider a large number of criteria. The owners were advised 1 to reconsider and decide which criteria are really important and.that . '

they wish to take exception to on the basis of new information.:- As a

  • j ground rule the owners could assume that the staff's load definition .

criteria are conservative and based upon that the SRSS method of load -

i

,3 combination will be acceptable for OBE plus relief valve discharge loads.

(e- The owners were cautioned that the staff has not established that position, '

however.

As a result of the owner's reassessment, the criteria listed in the enclosure will be considered further by the staff for the lead plants.

eltier, Project Manager I. 1 Light Water Reactors Branch No.1 l Division of Project Management )

Enclosure:

As Stated cc: See following pages 13MO4

-OI

-03

.- = = . .-_.-

~

r. '

i' * '

i Mr. Earl A. Borgmann

Vice President - Engineering The Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company P. O. Box 960 )

~

Cincinnati, Ohio 45201 ,

I cc: Troy B. Conner, Jr. , Esq. Mr. J. P. Fenstermaker {

Conner, Moore & Corber Senior Vice President - Operations 1747 Pennsyania Avenue, N. W. Columbus and Southern Ohio Washington, D. C. 20006 Electric Company 5

215 North Front Street Mr. William J. Moran Coulubus, Ohio 43215 General Counsel i The Cincinnati Gas and Electric David B. Fankhauser, PhD .

Company 3569 Nine Mile Road P. O. Box 960 Cincinnati, Ohio 45230 Cincinnait, Ohio 45201 Thomas A. Luebbers, Esq.

Mr. William G. Porter, Jr. Cincinnati City Solicitor Porter, Stanley, Arthur Room 214, City Hall and Platt Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 7s 37 West Broad Street f

~

Columbus, Ohio 43215 Mr. Stepnen Schumacher Miami Valley Power Project Mr. Peter H. Forster, Vice P. O. Box 252 President Dayton, Ohio 45401 Energy Resources The Dayton Power and Light Ms. Augusta Prince, Chairperson Company 601 Stanley Avenue P. O. Box 1247 Cincinnati, Ohio 45226 Dayton, Ohio 45401 J. Robert Newlin, Counsel The Dayton Power and Light Company P. O. Box 1034 Dayton, Ohio 45401 i

j -

Mr. James D. Flynn

( ).s Manager, Licensing .

' Environme_ntal Affairs The Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company

.; P. O. Box 960 t Cincinnati, Ohio 45201 i

i f

t-e ...e v - ~~

-a-ep hW m-weggM m WM hp *-*

  • t" ** ** '
  1. -@ M - h "4D -

p'W - g de--

  • 4 i

j Mr. Norman W. Curtis t

, Vice President - Engineering and Construction Pennsylvania Power and Light Company 2 North Ninth Street Allentown, Pennsylvania 18101 f

cc: Mr. Earle M. Mead Project Manager Pennsylvania Power & Light Company 2 North Ninth Street

, Allentown, Pennsylvania 18101 '

Jay Silberg, Esq.

Shaw, Pittman, Potts &

Trowbridge 1800 M Street, N. W.

. Washington, D. C. 20036 Mr. William E. Barberich, Nuclear Licensing Group Supervisor Pennsylvania Power & Light Company 2 North Ninth Street Allentown, Pennsylvania 18101 Edward M. Nagel, Esquire General Counsel and Secretary Pennsylvania Power & Light Company 2 North Ninth Street Allentown, Pennsylvania 18101

- Bryan Snapp, Esq.

Pennsylvania Power & Light Company 901 Hamilton Street

Allentown, Pennsylvania 18101 ,

~

(v ':

I

(

~

. _ - _ _ . . - - . . - , . . . ~ ~ ..

i .

4

_ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _. ._m. _ _ _ _ . . . . _ _ _ _ . . . . _ . _ . _

4 i ,

i 1 i j j Mr. Byron Lee, Jr.

l j Vice President 1- J Comonwealth Edison Company 4

P. O. Box 767 Chicago, Illinois 60690 4 .

l j -. e cc: Richard E. Powell, Esq.

j Isham, Lincoln & Beale 2

4 One First National Plaza 1 -

2400 j Chicago, Illinois 60670 1

l 2

4 i

4

/ '%

\ s' 2

l t

?

l 1 .

i i

i h

I 1

i i

4

, .e 7*s

, ,4 4

i i

1 t .

4 t, I

n =

( -*-e==+ -

-,s. .._.w.,

~

a ,

"l , .

i l Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation i

ccs:

, Arvin E. Upton, Esq. Niagara hbhawk Power Corporation 4 LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby & MacRae ATTN: Mr. Gerald K. Rhode, Vice President 1757 N Street, N. W. System Project Management

, Washington, D. C. 20036 300 Erie Boulevard West Syracuse, New York 13202 Anthony Z. Roisman, Esq.

Natural Resources Defense Council 917 15th Street, N. W. .

Washington, D. C. 20005 Mr. Richard Goldsmith Syracuse University i College of Law E. I. White Hall Campus Syracuse, New York 13210 T. K. DeBoer, Director Technological Development Programs New York State Energy Office Swan Street Building Core 1 - 2nd Floor Empire State Plaza Albany, New York 12223 i

w

..s i

i 4

I i

1 ., .._.

i

, _ __ m. _ _. - - - - - - - -

i . .

Northern Indiana Public Service Company ces:

Meredith Hempnill, Jr. Esq. Northem Indiana Public Service Company l' Assistant General Counsel ATIN
Mr. H. P. Lyle, Vice President Bethlehem Steel Corporation Electric Production 6 Engineering 701 East Third Street 5265 Hohman Avenue Bethlenem, Pennsylvania 18016 Hamond, Indiana 46325 l William H. Eichhorn, Esq.

1 Eichhorn, Morrow & Eichhorn j 5243 Hohman Avenue Hamond, Indiana 46320 .

Edward W. Osann, Jr., Esq.

Wolfe, Hucbard, Leydid, Voit & Osann, Ltd.

Suite 4600 One IBM Plaza Chicago, Illinois 00611 Robert J. Vollen, Esq.

109 North Dearborn Street Chicago, Illinois 60602 Porter County, Izaak Walton Imague of America, Inc.

Box 438 Chesterton, Illinois 463u4 Michael I. Swygert, Esq.

25 East Jackson Boulevaro i

Chicago, Illinois 60604 Richard L. Roobins, Esq.

t Laxe Michigan Federation i

53 West Jackson Boulevard Chicago, Illinois 60604 i

k .#I Maurice Axelrad, Esq.

Lowenstein, Newman, Reis & Axelrad 1025 Connecticut Avenue, N. W. .

Washington, D. C. 2u036 James N. Canan, Esq.

Russell Eggert, Esq.

Office of the Attorney General 188 Randolpn Street 9

Chicago, Illinois 60602 l

I

, , -  % g 94 h, mm e=-

" * *

  • O

i Long Island Lighting Company ccs:

., Edward M. Barrett, Esq. Long Island Lighting Comoany

.j .

General Counsel ATIN: Mr. Andrew W. Wofford Long Island Lighting Company Vice President q!,,1 e 250 Old Country Road 175 East Old Country Road

?- Mineola, New York 11501 Hicksville, New York 11801 3'

1 Edward J. Walsh, Esq.

General Attomey Long Island Lighting Company -

250 Old Country Road

. Mineola, New York 11501 J. P. Novarro Project Manager Shoreham Nuclear Power Station P. O. Box 618 Wading River, New York 11792 Jeffrey Cohen, Esq.

Deputy Comissioner and Counsel New York State Energy Office Agency Building 2 Empire State Plaza Albany, New York 12223 Howard L. Blau Blau and Cohn, P. C.

380 North Broadway i Jericho, New York 11753 Irving Like, Esq.

Reilly, Like and Schnieder 200 West Main Street

(. Babylong, New York 11702 MIB Technical Associates 366 California Avenue -

Suite 6

{ Palo Alto, California 94306 1

t 5

t e.=w w ==em+ -e een'me ep p = ne p w _ p e- ,ea sp w .g-_g. ,m ,.mp.%-

.t* ,

i '.' .

i i

l

Mr. Edward G. Bauer, Jr.

Vice President & General Counsel Philadelphia Electric Company 2301 Market Street

-} Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19101 4

1 cc: Troy B. Conner, Jr. , Esq.

)

-I Conner, Moore & Corber i

1747 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W.

j Washington, D. C. 20006 4

i W. William Anderson, Esq.

Deputy Attorney General ,

Room 512, Main Capitol Building Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 Frank R. Clokey, Esq.

Special Assistant Attorney General Room 218, Towne House Apartments P. O. Box 2063 Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17105 Honorable Lawrence Coughlin House of Representatives Congress of the United States Washington, D. C. 20515 Roger 8. Reynolds, Jr. , Esq.

324 Swede Street Norristown, Pennsylvania 19401 Willard C. Hetzel, Esq.

312 Main Street

! East Greenville, Pennsylvania 18041 i Lawrence Sager, Esq.

. . . Sager & Sager Associates i

( ", 45 High Street Pottstown, Pennsylvania 19464 Joseph A. Smyth Assistant County Solicitor County of Montgomery Courthouse lt Warristown, Penpsylvania 19404 -

i 1

m

st . i i , ..

e a j i

I Mr. Edward G. Bauer, Jr. - -

l t

i cc: Et: gene J. Bradley Philadelphia Electric Company  !

Associate General Counsel

.i 2301 Market Street  !

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19101  ;

t

( i

  • i f  !

i e  !

i  :

t j .' I a- . ,

i I

i t

I f

i f

[

l i i

e t P

P e

l I

i i n i I

, l 4

r .

I k

4 I r i  !

P i i

, I i

ew- t

. -, . .. _ . . - - - .. . . . _ _ . - . _ . _ - . . .-._,.__.I

i l

' .. - . . - - . - . - - - - - . - . . - . - - - \

it' ,

l

~

MARK II ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA MEETING OCTOBER 19, 1978

.) ATTENDANCE LIST

.I

'j

~

NAME ORGANIZATION I. A. Peltier NRC J. P. Knight NRC R. L. Tedesco NRC

! S. Hosfond NRC

. J. Kudrick NRC -

C. Anderson NRC T. M. Su NRC

' M. D. Lynch NRC J. C. Herman CG&E E. M. Mead PP&L H. C. Brinkmann CG&E W. E. Barberich PP&L D. C. Jeng NRC '

N. W. Curtis PP&L i D. F. Roth PP&L J. A. Weyandt Bechtel

, F. C. Cherny NRC

! R. M. Stephens NRC '

P. Y. Chen NRX S. Hou NRC R. A. Hill GE

, C. C. Lin S&W L. C. S. Nieh S&W R. L. O'Mara S&W H. Chau LILC0 J. P. Morin LILCO J. E. Metcalf S&W

C. H. Hofmayer NRC
J. Wilson NRC

}  ?~ F. Eltawila NRC k >-

W. R. Butler NRC A. Hafiz NRC Kulin D. Desai NRC  !

R. K. Mattu NRC t S. B. Mucciacciaro S&W j M. Hartzman NRC f F. C. Rally GE

! K. J. Green S&L l i K. G. Hazirotis GE j L. H. Frauenholz GE l

i

-4 h

-~

~ - ,

Attendance List -

I NAME i ORGANIZATION

~1 A. R. Smith GE W. M. Davis GE

-i J. K. Martin GE j D. M. O'Connor Bechtel H. W. Vollmer PECo.

i T. Jozkowski Burns & Roe 1

R. Bauer NES A. Bournia NRC S. Miner NRC R. Trevino NRC ~

P. D. Hedgecock WPPSS A. D. C. Tinsnons WPPSS M. R. Granback NIPSCO P. Stancavage GE G. Kitz S&L C. Tung BNL A. Bates NRC L. Lasher GE

=

1

)

a i i

6 h

f O NT M "h#

ON h M Wm eem.Nb@6 e g , , _

l NRC ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA MARK II POOL DYNAMIC LOADS e J LOAD LEAD PLANT LONG TERM PROGRAM i I.A 33 psi BOUNDING LOAD IS TO BE DFFR METHODOLOGY TO BE i APPLIED TO BASE MAT ONLY.

. i CLARIFIED BASED ON DATA

' FROM 4T AND EPRI TESTS.

CLARIFICATION I.B.l.a ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE I.B.l .b SHOREHAMTOPRESENT'GEkERIC -

APPROACH IN RESPONSE TO POSITION PER RESPONSE TO QUESTION 020.68 TO BE USED QUESTION 020.68. FOR LONG TERM PROGRAM.

NRC CRITERIA NOT APPLICABLE -

ACCEPTABLE FOR ZIMMER AND LASALLE TO PEDESTAL INTERIOR WHERE NO DOWNCOMERS EXIST.

1 I.B.l.c FACTOR OF l.1 IS NOT APPRO-

FACTOR OF 1.1 IS NOT APPRO-PRIATE CONSIDERING BASIC CON- PRIATE CONSIDERING BASIC t

SERVATISM OF POSTULATED CONSERVATISM OF POSTULATED

!' DRYWELL PRESSURIZATION FOR DRYWELL PRESSURIZATION FOR TEST. CONSTANT MAXIMUM TEST. CONSTANT MAXIMUM VELLCIU NOT APPROPRIATE VELOCITY NOT APPROPRIATE.

DISCUSSION REQUESTED I . B.1. d ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE -

I.B.l.e ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE f

i

] [' I .B.1. f ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE I.B.2 ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE h I.B.3.a FURTHER ANALYSIS HAS BEEN DYNAMIC POOL SWELL IMPACT i i PERFORMED TO SHOW DFFR ADE- METHODOLOGY WILL BE DEVELOPED ,

i QUATE FOR LEAD PLANT STRUC- IN THE LONG TERM PROGRAM.

l i TURES. l 3 DISCUSSION REQUESTED 1

I.B.3.b ACCEPTABLE NRC CRITERIA NOT APPLICABLE TO i

! PEDESTAL INTERIOR WHERE NO DOWNCOMERS EXIST (SEE I.B.l.b).  ;

l

. OCT 191978 -

--- - -6.- .

. j j NRC ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA l MARK II POOL DYNAMIC LOADS I (Continued)

LOAD LEAD PLANT LONG TERM PROGRAM

.; I.B.3.c ZIMMER AND LASALLE HAVE NO MULTIPLIER FOR STANDARD

, IASTALLED GRATING IN THE POOL GRATING TO ACCOMMODATE 4

l SWELL ZONE. SMALL DYNAMIC EFFECT IS NOT

- APPROPRIATE CONSIDERING

ACCEPTABLE TO SHOREHAM BASIC CONSERVATISM OF POS-I TULATED DRYWELL PRESSURI-ZATION USED TO ESTABLISH POOL VELOCITY. ,

I.B.4.a ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE i

I.B.4.b ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE f I.B.5 UNIFORM MIXING IN THE DRYWELL PRECLUDES UNEVEN VENT CLEAP.ING.

UNIFORM MIXING IN THE DRY-WELL PRECLUDES UNEVEN VENT j CLEARING.

t

( DISCUSSION REQUESTED I.C.1.a ACCEPTABLE FOR STATIC DYNAMIC LOADING SPECIFICATION ANALYSIS IS BEING DEVELOPED DURING

{

i LONG TERM PROGRAM

' TASK A.13 l

MULTIPLE VENT BRACING LOADS

I.C.1.b ACCEPTABLE j ARE NO GREATER THAN FOR SINGLE VENT.

l l BASIS, TASK C.7

, (.]

I.C.2.a ACCEPTABLE USE DFFR, REY. 3 I

I.C.2.b ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE l I.C.2.c ACCEPTABLE REFINED CHUGGING DEFINITION IS BEING DEVELOPED DURING ,

LONG TERM PROGRAM.

j F

' TASKS A.6, A.11 AND A.16 l 4

e

  • "**"" '*'d>* em oem eeom, e ._

'e6 * *

  • N g 6MN GD R6#M W . m * ='O  %* *
  • y aw-Whees' w 4 w.%,_ - * *y mi p -

e.

. l l_

l j . .

NRC ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA MARK II POOL DYNAMIC LOA 05 4

-i '

(Continued)

I

LOAD LEAD PLANT LONG TERM PROGRAM 1

j II.A (a) THERE ARE NO SUDDEN DYNAMIC (a) DOCUMENT WILL BE PRE-LOAD INCREASES ENCOUNTERED PARED USING EXISTING WITH QUENCHERS, THEREFORE DATA TO SUPPORT N0 NO LIMIT SHOULD BE USED. (LOCAL) LIMIT FOR QUEN-CHERS DURING LONG TERM (b) LOCAL TD BULK AT WILL BE 08- PROGRAM. -

TAINED FROM TEST.

TASK C.11 ~

(c) POOL TEMP. MONITORING SYSTEM WILL MEET NRC CRITERIA (b) LOCAL TO BULK AT WILL BE OBTAINED FROM TEST (c) POOL TEMP. MONITORING

' SYSTEM CRITERIA WILL BE DEVELOPED.

II.B (a) PLANT UNIQUE CLOSURE REPORTS (a) T-QUENCHER AND X-QUENCHE DEFINE METHOD USED TO 08- PROGRAMS WILL BE USED TO TAIN LOADS. , ESTABLISH LOAD PREDICTIVE METHODS DURING LONG TERM LOAD CASE #5 IS NOT REALISTIC PROGRAM.

.[/.(b) AND SHOULD NOT BE INCLUDED FOR EVALUATION. MULTIPLE VALVE CASES WILL BE ADDRESSED (b) LOAD CASE #5 IS NOT REAL-ISTIC AND SHOULD NOT BE IN PLANT DAR'S. INCLUDED FOR EVALUATION.

INDIVIDUAL VALVE TIME (c) PLANT UNIQUE CLOSURE REPORTS PHASING METHODOLOGY FOR DEFINE METHOD USED TO DEFINE MULTIPLE VALVE LOAD CASE l L BUBBLE FREQUENCY. #4 WILL BE DEVELOPED UURING LONG TERM PROGRAM.

, 7' TASK B.15 (c) T-QUENCHER PROGRAM WILL BE USED TO ESTABLISH BUBBLE FREQUENCY. X-QUENCHER PROGRAM WILL i

EVALUATE BUBBLE FREQUENCY.

I II.C.I.a NOT APPLICABLE ACCEPTABLE 4

I

-..---e a m .w#- -#... .

we - -

l ,

')

l 1

NRC ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA MARK II POOL DYNAMIC LOADS I

j (Continued)

LOAD LEAD PLANT LONG TERM PROGRAM II.C.1.b ZI MER AND LASALLE WILL USE T-QUENCHER ARM LOADS WILL BE X-QUENCHER METHODS. SHOREHAM ESTABLISHED FROM T-QUENCHER WILL USE LOADS ESTABLISHED PROGRAM.

FROM T-QUENCHER PROGRAM. -

II.C.2.a NOT APPLICABLE ACCEPTABLE II.C.2.b ZIMMER AND LASALLE WILL USE T-QUENCHER TIE DOWN LOADS WILL-X-QUENCHER METHODS. SHOREHAM BE ESTABLISHED FROM T-QUENCHER WILL USE LOADS ESTABLISHED PROGRAM.

FROM T-QUENCHER PROGRAM.

III.A.1 WILL ADDRESS CRITERIA BY PRO- RING VORTEX MODEL INCLUDING POSING CORRECTED EQUATIONS IN POTENTIAL FUNCTION FOR IN-

- , l.a AND 1.b, SUBMIT PRELIM. DUCED FLOW WILL BE DEVELOPED RING VORTEX MODEL AND SUP- AND A MORE APPROPRIATE e

PORTING SUBSCALE BENCH MARK ACCELERATION DRAG CONSIDERA-TEST. TION IDENTIFIED DURING LONG TERM PROGRAM. WPPSS PLANT UNIQUE MODEL WILL BE PROVIDED.

TASK A.5 III.A;2 A UNIQUE ZONE OF INFLUENCE A UNIQUE ZONE OF INFLUENCE AND WILL BE DEVELOPED BASED'ON LOADS WILL BE DEVELOPED BASED T-QUENCHER PROGRAM AND/0R ON T-QUENCHER PROGRAM AND/OR QUENCHER WATER JET MODEL. QUENCHER WATER JET MODEL.

\ .

LOADS WITHIN THE X-QUENCHER ZONE OF INFLUENCE WILL BE m BASED ON DATA AP'D/OR QUENCHER U WATER JET MODEL.

III.B.1 (a) ACCEPTABLE (a) ACCEPTABLE i (b) IDENTIFY MORE APPROPRIATE (b) IDENTIFY MORE APPROPRIATE j ACCELERATION DRAG COEFFI,- ACCELERATION DRAG COEFFI-CIENT TREATMENT THAN CIENT TREATMENT THAN

! FACTOR OF 3. FACTOR OF 3.

=-e.e~ - ,, --

,,....,ew .

wm . w. ,, ,

NRC ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA i

1 MARK II POOL DYNAMIC LOADS l

.(Continued) l LOAD LEAD PLANT LONG TERM PROGRAM i

III.B.1 (c) DEMONSTRATE THAT ACCELERA- (c) DEMONSTRATE THAT AC-

Continued 1 TION AT CENTER OF STRUCTURE CELERATION AT CENTER )

IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT. OF STRUCTURE IS TECH-  ;

DEMONSTRATE THAT ERROR NICALLY CORRECT. .

RESULTING IN VELOCITY AT DEMONSTRATE THAT ERROR l CENTER VS. MAXIMUM VELOCITY RESULTING IN VELOCITY j IS SMALL AND BOUNDED BY AT CENTER VS. MAXIMUM  ;

CONSERVATISM IN VELOCITY VELOCITY IS SMALL AND i APPLIED. THUS SIMPLIFIED BOUNDED BY CONSERVA-  !

DFFR APPROACH IS ACCEPT- TISMINVELOCITYAPPLIED.l ABLE. THUS SIMPLIFIED DFFR i APPROACH IS ACCEPTABLE. -

DEMONSTRATE THAT FACTOR OF .

4 IS NOT TECHNICALLY CORRECT (d) DEMONSTRATE THAT FACTOR  :

FOR STANDARD DRAG. REF. (e) 0F 4 IS NOT TECHNICALLY QUESTION RESPONSE TO 020.70. CORRECTFORSTANDA INTERFERENCE EFFECTS ON REF. QUESTION RESPONSE F ACCELERATION DRAG WILL BE TO 020.70. INTERFERENCE  !

ANALIZED ON A PLANT UNIQUE EFFECTS ON ACCELERATION i BASIS. DRAG WILL BE ANALIZED ON. ;

A PLANT UNIQUE BASIS.

(f) ACCEPTABLE I III.B.2 (a) ACCEPTABLE (a) ACCEPTABLE s

(b) FOR III.B.l(a) AND (c) (b) FORIII.B.l(a)AND(c) i THRU (f), SEE AB0VE. FOR THRU(f),SEEABOVE. FOR l

'. III.B.1(b),ITWILLBE III.B.1(b), IT WILL BE DEMONSTRATED THAT A FACTOR DEMONSTRATED THAT A FACTOR s

OF 3 FOR DRAG COEFFICIENTS OF 3 FOR DRAG COEFFICIENTS !

(.)

~ IS NOT CORRECT FOR OSCIL- IS NOT CORRECT FOR OSCIL- !

LATING BUBBLES AND THAT LATING BUBBLES AND THAT i STANDARD DRAG LOADS ARE STANDARD DRAG LOADS ARE  !

NEGLIGABLE. NEGLIGABLE.

III.B.3 T-QUENCHER BUBBLE LOCATIONS AND DEVELOP METHODOLOGY BASED ON l SIZE WILL BE ESTABLISHED FOR USE T-QUENCHER PROGRAM.

' i' WITH RAMSHEAD METHODOLOGY FOR DETERMINING AMPLITUDE AND FRE-l SOURCE PRESSURE PREDICTIVE QUENCY FOR ZIMMER AND LASALLE. METHODS DEVELOPED FROM X- 6 QUENCHER PROGPAM WILL BE USED SHOREHAM UILL USE METHODS DE- WITH X-QUENCHER SUB. STRUCTURES '

VELOPED UNDER T-QUENCHER PRO- METHODOLOGY DEVELOPED IN LONG GRAM. TERM PROGRAM. >

TASK A.5 i - - - . - - - ==.-:' . = - - *  : =- ~

- =-

i l NRC ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA 1

MARK II POOL DYNAMIC LOADS (Continued) i LOAD LEAD PLANT LONG TERM PROGRAM f

III.C ACCEPTABLE MODEL WILL BE DEVELOPED IN LONG TERM PROGRAM.

' TASK A.5 -

l .-

BS:mh/1794-1601 10/13/78 m.4~. . . - - . w-. w,,

.....w. m. . . _ , ,,,,% ,

  • i NRC ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA MARX II LOAD COM3INATIONS FOR i PIPING SYSTEMS NOTE: SRSS IS TECHNICALLY JUSTIFIED AND IS THE LICENSING BASIS.

l I

i LOAD COMBINATION LEAD PLANT LONG TERM PROGRAM

  1. 1 N+SRV, TO B ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE
  1. 2 N+SRV +0BE TO B N+SRV2 +0BE TO B AND N+

x N+SRVALL+0BE TO B USED. -

APPROVED GESSAR APPROACH SRVALL+0BE TO C USED.

USED FOR NSSS* SRV2 IS ARBITRARY.

APPROVED GESSAR APPRCACH

. USED FOR NSSS. SEE RE-SPONSE TO QUESTION MEB-7b.

f3 + ACCEPTABLE. WE RESERVE RODABAUGH PAPER TO BE USED TOC 4]RV,j)+SSE THE RIGHT TO USE THE AS BASIS FOR ACCEPTANCE RODABAUGH CRITERIA CRITERIA (I.E., CORD)..

WHEN APPROVED.

f4 N+SRVa ENVELOPED BY #5 AND 6 TO Cl"ds+0BE+IBA

)

  1. 5 N+SRV4s +0BE+IBA ENVELOPED BY #6 TO Cl*1
  1. 6 N+SRVads +SSE+IBA SAME AS POSITION FOR #3 SAME AS POSITION FOR #3.

TO C l")

, #7 N+SSE+DBA TO C(4) SAME AS POSITION FOR #3 SAME AS POSITION FOR #3.

, SEE RESPONSE TO QUESTION MEB-7a.

  1. 8 N TO A ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE
  1. 9 N+0BE TO B ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE
  1. 10 N+SRY +SSE+DBA APPLIED TO CONTAlletENT ONLY (SEE M 020.22 & DFFR 5.2.4)

TO @f

\ ,

f BS:mh/1602 10/13/78

}

t - - - - - - - -

.~

, j

NRC ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA j OTHER MISCELLANEOUS POSITIONS I NRC POSITION LEAD PLANT LONG TERM PROGRAM FUNCTIONAL ACCEPTABLE. WE RESERVE DEMONSTRATION OF FUNCTIONAL CAPABILITY THE RIGHT TO USE THE CAPABILITY WILL BE BASED ON

. RODABAUGH CRITERIA RODABAUGH CRITERIA.

WHEN APPROVED.

i l

MASS-ENERGY ACCEPTABLE TO ZIMMER AND VERIFICATION OF MASS-ENERGY RELEASE FOR LASALLE. RELEASE RATE H/LS BEEN SHOWN ANNULUS PRESS. P,Y ZIMMER, LASALLE AND -

SHOREHAM ASSUMES VERIFI- HATCH-2.

CATION OF MASS-ENERGY RE-LEASE RATE HAS BEEN SHOWN BY ZIMMER, LASALLE AND HATCH-2.

r QUESTIONS SEB-2, MEB-5 155 PEAK BROADENING TO BE USED.

SEB-3, MEB-5 CLOSELY SPACED MODES ARE COMBINED PER 1.92 WHERE REANALYSIS IS PERFORMED. NSSS SCOPE USES MODIFIED SUMMATION PER APPROVED GESSAR.

l MEB-1 ACCEPTABLE MEB-2 ACCEPTABLE 4

MEB-6 ACCEPTABLE .

i MEB-7a AND b SEE LOAD COMBINATION TABLE FOR CASE #2 AND 7

~

MEB-B SEE FUNCTIONAL CAPABILITY DISCUSSION ABOVE AND LOAD COMBINATION AND ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA TABLE.

BS:mh/1603 10/13/78 N"** --*=+-=*= *w.. e.o . w mem= = , .. - , . _

,,wa4 ....som~. --

    • * ~~

. ....... - . *~~'".

y *o

/ J er 1-

, l 1

MaxIIOGRESPONSE l I To I E ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA si' AssowTE Sm n SSS LOAD CmsINATIm TE + SRV x

FUNCTIONALCRITERIA UPSET n F11ERGENCY t .

LCADS - SECONDARY To LOAD CorSINATIONS SRVMoSTSIGNIFICANTLOAD f

J e

b

. .. , , , .., -- .+.- . - -

=*-w-* ^ ' * * " * * * * * ' * ~ ~ "' ' ' * ' - "

1

.,m.. , _ _ . . . _ _ . ._ . . _ __ ._ -

0 l

LDADs Ovsvi s

- Ib IDENTIFICATION OF IMPACT OF l@C CRITERIA

.,. -GENERICRESPON3E -

LEAST CDtON DENOMINATOR MANY EXCEPTIONS SiOREHM PLANT UNIQUE CONSIDERATIONS ,

I ('

- 1%m 1.oAD - SRV PUWT UNIQUE APPRomi

-1.0ADCRITERIARESPONSE 26(RCLOADCRITERIA 5 Av tritu BY MK ll 03 2 ADDITIONAL 7 ACCEPTED r/

\,_

1CHANGEINl@CCRITERIA 2 N9f PROBLEMS (LEAD PUWTS) 2 ADDm0NAL NDI PROBLEMS (SWREHM) l

,g,. ,

em.eem emw6 m N9 - --*

i

-j .

1

. LEAD PLAttr LOADS

.l '

urA REuTED Rxx. SWEu.

. SMAu. STRUCTURE IMPACT - NEW MCOEL .

ASYMETRIC VENT FLOW - DISCUSSION PtoL VELOCm - CHANGE NRC CRITERIA PEDESTAL POOL SWELL - NEW PROBLEM SUINERGED EOUt0ARY - NEW PROBLEM SH)REHAM800LSWELL-PLANTUNIQUE STEAM C0tOENSATION LASALLE VENT LDAD - PLANT LNIQUE SRVRELATED POOL TEMPERATLRE - NO LIMIT AIR CLEARING - RAMSHEAD OK FOR ZIMER, L4SAU E 1

' ! ')

% - SFOREHAM UMD

, TIEDOWN ' ZUtER, lASAu.E j - Shone w4 U M D LOCA/SRV SUBMERGED DMG JET-NEWINFORMATION AIR RM F - NEW INFORt% TION, PLANT LNIQUE

. 1 4

.*% =. .%sc *-- N-*w*'**.e- - - * <

M -,~-~n d & - - ,-- - 1 m & - ,

9 J

i . . . ._-_.___ . _ _ .

i . .

4 O

1*

i ANCE @ ! M IA b ACT l

IlTILITIES SHmem

, 1YEARDELAY

$20 - 150 MIu.Im IK SUBSTANTIAL LPP Raylew EnoRr DELAYIPRavIsw 4 e o

1

. es l l \

4

, 4 .,. , _ . _

\ A) a b %. I LPP C e,, v, e  %, ec, l ,

i. L r -a. ,. d (Pa. I S u I / - ML / ie<-,,,.-/,,,,  ?
w. 4 +

'2 C T M. 2, d Su, ll SYedarr *T.,.ooe*~l l 'i. Lx.A5,s-) U ,, , L i , M x, - , . m th d eyu.fi I 9', C. rr' .13) $9V Gon d . .

i

,_ (D (LLL le 'Pham.e

\ (Q /1L L L le Fea r Ne, e y I r. (r77-) S u h ,,, 1 Dee e (.,eI t

( A./) / oe4 Tot f

i ( M. e.) 7 Ghe,, he 7e ,. e,-f e a -((ues e c l

.i l

! l

! L- 2  % cic,.-9,cd.. n. L , -

i /, C2,4) 33 Ps; V 1 C /e,,, , ' Sm i me r. d I <h b ,.<

+ ( ' ut .4 / % e. *L S - .,,, 4 'De > l'. . L, i b  ! c eca leie f.,. else s , dto s m /t'd.

I inh <de<-e, a f-fe af L u 4 c.N-

, . i s t ,

! i i

I l

I r .

i i

! l l '

l l

, . = - - . ...#. . . .--_..._._..e . . ..__ . . . _,

a .

l l

9 CRITERIALOADI.A I

POOL B0lt0R( LOADS D(RIfG W CLEARIfG f

i s DFFR ETHODOLf6Y COIEERVATIWLY SECIFIED RR PASEMAT mLY I

l e 4T MTA SDS DFFR ETKm mY CONSERVATI91

, (

e W AIR QIARING WALL PRESSURES B0lt0 W CLEARIfE e LTP WILL CLARIP/ DFFR El10DOLOGY BASED ON 4T DATA i

i i

  • _ _ . _ . _ _ . . . ... . _ . . _ . .....~ .. ._ . .. ,_.,. _ . .. .._ . .. _ _ . .

w

CRITERIONI.X.~5 VENT FLOW AS5Yi TRIES i

l 0 MIXIE PDDTED BY 1600 FT/SEC SONIC DISOMRGE vel.0 CITY 8 DEFLECTOR PLATES PREVENT STE#1 FM ENTERIE DIECTLY O L0m VENTS INITIALLY FULL OF AIR

- MXIM AIR BLEBLE FRESSUE IN POOL GOVERNED BY INITIAL AIRINVENTS F

- MAXIM AIR BIELE PRESSUE OC0JRS WITHIN .2 SECONDS OF VENT WATER CLEARIE (4T) 4 CONCLUSION: GOOD MIXIE, MAXIM AIR BLELE PRESSUE MIN.Y DETERMIED BY AIR INITIALLY IN VENT 1

l d

i I

e.-m..e..< _, ... . , . _ _

g.

i I. P 1

i 4, .

i i

NRC CRITERION I.'A.2 b

. e 1.1 MULTIPLIER ON CALQJLATED POOL SWE11 vel.0 CITY  !

i 8 CONSERVATIZ OF CURRENT SPEC. HAS BEEN DEP0NSTRATED  :

l 6

  • \

F D

f I

I

+

i l

l i

f 3 I

~J 1

l i

j mb Mn 6me -go, ww-h p e- We g ame y -esa +, .p,_,.,, _ , ., , g., g . . , _

i POOL SWFII \WCITY CONSEWATISTE t

t 4T DRWEU. PRESSURE CALOJLATED WITH EDM - 10320 NDEL l 0 INPUT TO POOL SWEU. K0EL FOR SE1ECI'ED 4T RUNS 9 DEENSTRATES 5 - 8% CONSERVATISM FOR VEI.0 CITY (R0l20 3 QJESTICN 020,7D 0 AIDITIONAL CDNSERVATISM l

- MARK II PLANTS HAVE CDOL DRWEl.L.'GliN 33, 4T)

- HOT DRWEl.L PRESS 3 - 4 PSI GREATER THAN COLD DRWEU.

, PRESSIN4TTESTS

- ADDITI0fW. 5 - 10% CONSERVATISi IN POOL swell VELOCITf l t

. . I I

. - - .- . w..

POOL l .

JURFAC E VEL.ocI TY l

l I

RUM 3 4 l

{ i i

.+- = lt. Espe 4s6 W IW p aso n,st> 99WM W W!

3 s. --

i- -

pa.essum.t twTvT i.: __

= p.z i,teuse WT4 l

h.vu 't AH !

l. ..,;; li ucts.MotM IWWT

. = ,

-l .._--..+-- t - =

T re15T D*T4 t

.9<

4 " _al _ _

...n.---.------

j4 *i... ' 4 4 , ,. , i . __ . ..

3. -44 1 i. . j,i, 1 K.;'-

.,4e. .dh

--i '- -+"" . i H' ' H ~ J- -++ j-j~- j-'""-

.4.g.9% + ,j.Tp; .o. ',, --

y 4

, p, i -7 4- ,

i 3

2 -

.a.

_ __. 2 _._ _a --

4

-- J . -. --

- .- ma m, 9_..a .p .

- a. -

1. .. - ; -. y

%g - - -

. . ...s,4 =

t

( 22  ;

.s.;/4,2 MMM:, ! i; i l

!! '. M, - '

i

. l ., i, ii. '

a, i. .,.- i

>- .ao

's , ,; ' .

,- H. -

a .-#  ;  !

(o ' .

+ '

!y2 . .;- -

' '.+, 2..aaaf

-s,

%;d- }i -

, .m.. . **'

/p ._ a> .. =

4- -

. ,. 2 2. -- -

4

..-..-4

-.i ., .

y .__

.g ,

n_

.- .i 4 ... . . . - .; . - -----a. , >

.m. -

a-+--3-4 ,

r ..; . -s .

_.4 -

, 2 - t . ' ,. . 2 4- , ,

. . f - .- f = ,

4

'~)

n ,,

, , .s 1

/4 -f : . V -- .':

. - =

- 3  ;,

Q

. s 7

,2-\ ', ;

i u- -

F i ,

, 2

'i .

I

> .- , i,

' , , i. . s *

[..-- i o j ,

/c ---g  ;

a k

J n. -

O . . '

's o F _.s/ ----

s, ', , . - , .,,; ., ...

! Q ,

6 '

,,,  ; ;\ , ,, ,

i,C;',; .

'{;;  !

- n..-

~.s d.g . j

.. . .;,.L. , s. .k i. f- j .aad.e .. 44 , . .s4

-_ a,

..- m...

. fg.

a, 1, , . -a %. . '

. m i . , ,

i 4%  ;.

4 'f '

g . . l .

-H s . i'.

' ' 3, - , , . .....

t. ' .

, ,. . . i

-a

~

aa s

a.,i + '

S a .,

a ,. ...

3 ,, .: _H-+ .

' .' I .2 3

  • 4' 5" 'S *7 *g *f /0 /. E.-

~

  • T/M E , SE C . ,

F/b .3 a ,,a um.

vs.v T c.t.t o e -

  • * * -e. . DM 6em *eene 1.s me-eq p Deew , , , . , , , , _

m - , , - - . . - - . . . - , . -

. Poo L.

SURFACE VEL.ow n' I F

r R V H 3 ~1
y. a. .,. as.p .....s....)._..

..,. ..e a RS$ Pome warH guy y W

!..44 q ., , .

p .....j....

. 4 ..

.......4.'.- ub DW%

  • q '. --

.3 "7 Ac%dh.c /s/A T .

O .!

4g

. ,. .. M.. .

.e4...q.

4 ......t- .._

- %EWopst w iTg ggy p ,

.,.,.. . ..-. m g. g , pg i

_ .2,,,...... .

2 ._ss.q

~ . , ,

.+a

, - - a_ . .-

"m af '1' ~1' DST b41A

= *-- .s. 4-24 alqT .u . .

, a. - 4

_.a,

>a o r

,: 1, _ . ._ .a .; _ 4

.a-

.a .- .

s.

a se 2 = 4 - ' 1 a. >

. \, - -.

4a.

aaaa. . .f

_3. . . '. g , . .

'Q '

,44- l N J# i + .:. : . .y . 7.___.y : 1 4. a. '

,-l +.___._. a;. p. _ + -4. . : .-

p ,

- - - - + ,, .,.

  • ; - 4
  • 1- i k . - .-

-T , . 7 i- i . . ~*T'. , .

(

,,, 7 7-- , . . .-

~

/) .24-

,22 1

., i; i n

, ,. . 3 .. 4 i

, i iii 2,2.4- . ...

22, 4 I" %.1 iii.

a.4 _, -

3.

' - 1 4 r

- ..a-_-- . . . 4_, _ .a_ ._ .. ,; ;s 4. ,,, ,,

, ; a. 4 g

. ..j f * ._,ap .

1 M ..a. _. .. s .

_ m, ,- w.y. ~

.H . . . . . -

4

--a. --

-i r;

. .t .- - , - 11- J ,: 47 .-

  • H2 .,a._wa

. e  : .

aJ. .. .. 'J.

a.4 4 , -

.H44

// .

i - -

.. a-

+ '

a.

r

\1 '. _a.14

,g.

_). .- , ,

r .__  ;

4 i

.-,: \,

_aa.

, i t2

. /4 ' s e ,t --

m .

1

- - _e.- + -

_a. ,a . .+ 1,d y a .u 3 s.

--..a. ._ 4 .. _ 1 sa.a..

, . 4 . . . . . ...a.a.

3. e.. ..u4 4, .

y

/4 e

3 ., ...

9..

.aa

-4 -

+r  :

-fa, , . -Ha i-+442-

' a .. ..

/2. -

- ,- , l

\.s . i -- --- g J - - -

  • f- **  ; g , .,=- ,

. ,, . - , -t- -

f-- . . . . t ,

/0 . . r,

. Y,

. ...t...

3.,,

. .. . . , .  ; , . , ,2.,.

y ..,..A_ ,

. ll

'4-t j.4 i _. . , . ,

. 4.i _ y. ... 4 4.-- .a --*; 7. .,

,,, .H 3 -

3- =7 4

.;; .... -H\, i+t-H .+

' ; ! ' c.--H '. l' J a . .  : . .

Ja d -.._a , -d ._:

l

].J._

4 t - - t- -* - - -- d, - -. 1 - ---- t - --41.s--44i-a A ..aJ3' .. 14 :4. .4 a 2 4 3..e

-- i .

.- j t*

i2 - 4.n-J 444. a. 4 4

-- 1  ;- -- t 1-t-4/ ,

. ii a .

. . _a, -

. , y'i,4-r,,

5 . . > , 5,

  • A  ! .

1 1

, ' Ig 1 , t y '

4* ' '

l l -

'l -

- -- -f -- 4. --* -

--4 , - - -.'- . f ,. + +

./ . J. .3 . 4 ..s- .C .7 .? .T /. *  !. 3.

  • 7/4 E, .

5 af'C. .

pg* 4  % TIM E AF TE K VF.hJT C.LE A% d6 .

  • * * " - * * * " *
  • w- . , . . . , , , , _ _ _ _ _ ,_

t CRITERION II.B - CASE 5 4

i

i I MJLTIRI SRV ETHODOLOGY i .

i PHYSICAL REALITY CAUSES ASYNCHR0f0US LDAD

! AIR BUBBES FORM AT DIFFERENT TIES I

- VESSEL PRESSUE RISE RATE

- VALVE SET POINT TOLEP#lCE l

- VALVE STRDE TIE i

- OTER S

1 AIR BUBBLES OSCILLATE AT DIrredNT FREQUENCIES

- LIE AIR V0 Life

- LNEVEN AIR CLEARING 1

i MJLTIPLE VALVE ETHODOLOGY MAINTAINS MARGIN

- PRESSURES AT 90/90 Q N IDENCE t

'~

- ATTENJATION BOLNDED BY 2 Ro/R

- MET SEVERE T 59 CASES SBICIED

-n,..., .n n .. ... , , , . . ..

l

, l i

CRITERION 1.B.3.C I

i i i POOL swell LDADS ON GPATIE i

TFR LOAD IS BOUEIE i

- BWELOPES TEST IATA

]

- MAXIliN VEI.0 CITY OF L10 FT/SEC h

FREQUENCY MJLTIPLIER INAPPROPRIATE .

i

- ONLY VALID FOR SIELE DESREE OF FREEDT SYSTEM l

- BASED ON DRAG AND IWACT BUT TESTS SDI NO IWACT l r

- VALLES TgX/2 ONLY APPLY TO 100% OPEN GRATIE t t

- DYNAMIC ANALYSIS SHOULD BE APPLIED PATHER THAN LOAD FACTOR t

I r

i i I

' e r

l

- -. . ~ 1; l

" Vater- Jet Experi.ments.

  • SET. k3*:ht,bt*d M:ar'cT. k sc*t hi. {ecilii,(esti i

[**'

.g. Tests show %hreord not'butlet' I

i y,I l . h ttog to& 4Detuvel Veloci% l

,,'8', d about 74 4 clowoconust veloc'steg lI :} ~

. f 81,

  • t.nveloped % dr b@bk gitcwiq e 'htti.% room'. -

S Smpli6ed Wrtex fig rnodel (. 'N SorprabS) 1

- MCdel let tdi% Vorbitx, ft'ng ek downconner eltt-convert .let Mnetic energg i+o verticitg

[ Ca\calde c3rotuth of ci% and ou.Nwd Nvement O

luc del vortex as obise seeriod team's actucemer ava cekalde. indxed xceter&ttb -Reid Preittniwarg QsTT comparubw OSjt*M'*)

afg4 _g, vs Pe*da- r=

Model P2. (tG- 0 M t1T t44'Li * "51 *

! Te.st- ~ t. + &zo% smWer sel 1ez. Al 3-3 SS H9.sy i "$

=-- -

_....eeom* ~ ~-, ~ ~ * * ~ ~ ~ "

ACCELERAT/DN DRAC prior TO /MPArr .

, l OF A STRUCYORE AWD 7~BANSL4 T/A/C 4

SP//ERE

- ~

3 1

l flQW f/ ELD UNDISTURBED BY STRX7702E : kJ/,

  • 6 ,

( .

  • G M  !

g ,

Va$=0

' \

I l Floy F/ ELD SAf!SF/ES 2ERO NORMAL VELDCITY l 800MDARY CoNDI770W:

n \

toff is-ir-ra

, .o. e

  • w= O g& - 4h qe o meg- m

, - - ye &pwe w wwe

l l . . .

l -

l *  ;- . . -

~.

s,, .. ,

s j . .

1 l -

I i

1 -

l - .

1 i

~

i i

i

=

l

.- e e

. e e

( 10 e

- e

  • t _. .

- e 1 e

. e s

e o

e

- e .

e o eoe DPEFlinsENTAL

, , STEADY g = 1.2 e

e

  • e e

=

e'

. e i '

e

,.e g

  • I -/

I .

I t

I i I I I I I'II f f I f 11ffl l t t ? f 11ff I

I 10 #f 100 3/D w r. r w y a crea n c ~ e w a r m ,y, w c _ ,is w i

11 Y$$MHV _.

g= g .w,g, .,, ,

. _ _ _ . . - - - - - - - ~'

EQU/ VALENT' JJN/ FORM

\ R.oW ACCELERAT/0A/ '

l l'

t J

4 j

I 'e I

i  !

t e..

savacz P. f

} .

%CB I i

r lq . - - -

t i r '

l  !

i L (Mocot 't Nosmni \

! \

(~) fA -

L .p crgsc r)

Q12nd r f. n 2 As L + co T

I s u a u su n >

QRED/tFNCW) m z ~ oo

.l%f/Ht9-78 '

sow e * * * ~ ~ * ' * * "

_t ,

+. - .-,, +,- - - --- ~ - -

e e

l -w = * - , ,e w . . , .

! e e e * ** 0

, * n .

e t

l l

s I

av i

i oseaunwaprow i 4 -

l r  !

C, D i Y  !;

k "_ -

t b

I l - I i s I  !

g I '

I 8  :

0 ' ' ' ' I '

0 ' 4- ! X 10 20 30  !

9 j"W A* OnT/D = AWAlO l i

I 1

i I

l i

l t

. I l

XM a-o.jp  :

.. - .. . -- >

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20062C712&oldid=3555706"