ML20059L911

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Petition to Suspend Operation of Plant Pending Criminal Investigation
ML20059L911
Person / Time
Site: Brunswick  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 10/14/1993
From: Kohn M
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED, KOHN, KOHN & COLAPINTO, P.C. (FORMERLY KOHN & ASSOCIA, NATIONAL WHISTLEBLOWER CENTER
To:
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
Shared Package
ML20059L910 List:
References
NUDOCS 9311180002
Download: ML20059L911 (3)


Text

..._

a t

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

)*

i In Re

)

I

)

CAROLINA POWER AND LIGHT CCMPANY

)

Docket No.

)

.(Brunswick Nuclear Power

)

Station)

)

)

PETITION TO SUSPEND THE OPERATION OF THE BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR POWER STATION PENDING CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION The Nationa) Whistleblower Center, Coastal Alliance for a Safe Environment, and Charles A. Webb, jointly submit, pursuant to 10 C.F.R. 52.206, a petition requesting the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ("NRC") Office'of Investigations ("OI") to investigate potential criminal wrongdoing which appears to have 1

began in 1984 and is continuing by the licensee of the Brunswick Nuclear Power Station, Carolina Power & Light Company ("CP&L").

To wit, Petitioners allege as follows:

4 CP&L has asserted to the NRC and the public that cracks in the shroud of the Brunswick Nuclear Power Station reactor were recently discovered as a result of an

^

inspection.

CP&L's assertion is false.

CP&L discovered cracks in the shroud some nine years earlier when engineers who detected the cracks brought the existence of the cracks to the attention of CP&L management.

After some heated exchanges between managers, CP&L decided to have paperwork prepared to cover-up the problem.

The engineers who detected the cracks were instructed by management to prepare paperwork so that the cracks would not be reported to the NRC.

CP&L's cover-up of significant safety flaws

.n the reactor shroud demonstrates that CP&L management does not have the character or integrity to operate a nuclear facility because it is unwilling to self-report significant safety problems to the NRC and is willing to take unreasonable risks with the health and safety of public.

l i

i

+

9311180002 931115 hDR ADOCK 05000324 I

PDR L

.,,,. __ _... _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _. -, _.. ~. -..... _, _ _.... -. ~. _.., _ _ _ _. _,

t 0

In addition to the general information provided above, the National Whistleblower center has information from confidential sources that vill be provided to NRC Staff on a strictly confidential basis.

Petitioners hereby request the following:

1.

That NRC Staff enter into a confidentiality agreement with the National Whistleblower Center to facilitate the release of additional information; j

2.

That the NRC immediately require CP&L to State Whether it has, in fact, known about cracks in the shroud since at least 1984:

3.

That NRC's Office of Investigations determine whether cPEL management engaged in criminal wrongdoing, commencing in 1984, when CP&L initially failed to report the existence of cracks in the shroud to NRC.

Respectfully submitted,

  • P h Michael D.

Kohn KOHN, KOHN & COLAPINTO, P.C.

517 Florida Ave., NW Washington, D.C.

20001-1850 (202) 234-4663 i

Attorney for the National Whistleblower center and charles Webb Ron ShackelforcK/ U (919) 799-452-5200 Representative of the Coastal Alliance for a Safe Environment hated. October 14, 1993 087\\206.1 2

e g,

v-

--y...,--v.-..,,,..-...-..-..w-

.y.--

-.-w

+-

m-

-