ML20059K646
| ML20059K646 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Farley  |
| Issue date: | 01/24/1994 |
| From: | Dennis Morey SOUTHERN NUCLEAR OPERATING CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9402020193 | |
| Download: ML20059K646 (3) | |
Text
Y
. 's 4 +
- Soutaern Nac4 ear CperaSng Compaay
+ Post Otce Bcx 1295 B:rmegnam, A'aba-a 35231 Te ephone (205) 608 5 ? 31 k
L Southern Nudear Operating Company
- o. e =<,y v;ce pres cent Fane4 pro:ect
'he $^t !!"ern elecinC 5}5:em January 24, 1994 Docket No. 50-364 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 i
Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant - Unit 2 Radial Peakina Factor Limit Report Correction Gentlemen:
The enclosed figures for the Radial Peaking Factor Limit Report (RPFLR) for Cycle 10 of Unit 2 were forwarded by letter dated December 13,1993. However, the forwarding letter contained an improper docket number. Therefore, this letter is being sent to forward the figures under the correct docket number.
If you have any questions, please advise.
Respectfully submitted, (l h )) % v Dave Morey
^
REM / cit:RPFLRR2. REM Enclosure cc: See next page.
NEL-94-0018 l
t '. O n, 3 * - n O'
9402O20193 940124 (7
PDR ADOCK 05000364 i
P 909 j
.-, i-U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 2 -
l cc: U S. Nuclear Reculatory Commission. Washinoton. D.C.
B. L.- Siegel U. S. Nuclear Reaulatory Commission. Reaion ll S. D. Ebneter, Regional Administrator T. M. Ross, Senior Resident inspector l'
I F
I t
g m.
~
v ;-
, ' y/
3 4,.
i k.
i 4
4 L
f t'
1 l
F P
Enclosure k
t p
P P
b
..0 i
1 9
?
e i
e
- I y
5 0
1
. I f
I 9
t y
4
+
U I
P I
4
-w e
e. -, -
t
-m p
e v t
FIGURE 1
.Y VANTAGE 5 M AXIMUM (FOT x Pre!) VERSUS CORE HEIGHT DURING NORMAL OPERATION 2.5 i
i i
2.4
~
~
m T
i i
~
+
+
+
g}
+
+ 4 i
A
%m
+
. +
4 2.2
. +
1 s
4 2.1 i
2.0
' ^
a E1.9 l
a 4
[1.8 a
4 i
b.
i i'
21.7 a
3 i
1 Q1.6 4
3E i
i i
1.5 i
1.4 i
I I
t
[
i 1.3
{
FXY LlWIT = 1.87 1.2 l
1.1 l
1.0 0 2
4 6
10 12 CORE HEIGHT (FEET) 8 A-3 f MC12503fg 2->
~ 1{ "' e.
FIGURE 2 LOPAR MAXIMUM (FQT x Pts!) VERSUS CORE HEIGHT DURING NORMAL OPERATION 2.5 i
2.4 4
2.3
-~
~
~
~_-
+
~
m i
m
~
. +
+
+
^
2.2
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
i 2.1 3
T 4
i I
+
y
+
2.0 a
E1.9 n.
M 1.8
- o u.
m 1.7 m
m 3
6 41.6 1
T 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 i FXY LlWIT = 1.75 t
1.1 i
e 1.0 0 2
4 6
10 12 CORE HEIGHT (FEET) 8 A-4