ML20059J591
| ML20059J591 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Farley  |
| Issue date: | 11/04/1993 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20059J585 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9311120278 | |
| Download: ML20059J591 (2) | |
Text
,
[p""
. c, UNITED STATES
'i NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
{.
\\....
- j WASHINGTON, D.C. 20556M1 SAFFTY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATED TO AMENDMENT NO.103 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-2 AND AMENDMENT NO. 96 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-8 SOUTHERN NUCLEAR OPERATING COMPANY. INC.
JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT. UNITS 1 AND 2 DOCKET NOS. 50-348 AND 50-364
1.0 INTRODUCTION
By letter dated August 28, 1992, the Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.
(the licensee), submitted a request for changes to the Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Units I and 2 (Farley), Technical Specifications (TS). The requested changes make sever 6 administrative changes to section 6.0 of the TS.
2.0 EVALUATION The licensee proposed the following changes to section 6.0 of the TS:
1.
The title "Vice President - Nuclear" will be changed in Section 6.0 to "Vice President."
2.
The term " Nuclear Generation" will be replaced with " Plant Farley nuclear operations" in Section 6.1.2.
3.
Sections 6.3.1 and 6.4.1 are revised to remove references to the March 28, 1990, NRC letter and Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 55 as all requirements are now embodied in 10 CFR Part 55.
4.
The title " Performance and Planning Manager" will be changed in Sections 6.5.1 and 6.5.3 to " Systems Peformance Manager."
The changes identified above are administrative in nature, and provide clarifying changes to the Farley TS. These changes do not result in any physical alterations to the configuration of Farley, nor do they affect the operation, maintenance, or testing of the plant.
The staff finds the proposed changes to be acceptable.
3.0 STATE CONSULTATION
In accordance with the Commission's regulations, the State of Alabama official was notified of the proposed issuance of the amendment. The State official had no comments.
9311120278 931104 DR ADOCK 0500 8
w
m E
i.:
i j '
4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION
This amendment changes recordkeeping reporting, or administrative procedures; or requirements. -Accordingly, the amendment meets.the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(10).
Pursuant to 10
- i CFR 51.22(b) no environmental impact statement;or environmental assessment
?
need be prepared in connection with-the issuance of 'this amendment..
5.0 CONCLUSION
The Commission has concluded,_ based on-the considerations discussed'above, that: -(1) there is reasonable assurance that the health' and safety of the _
a public will not be' endangered by operation in the proposed manner, (2): such-activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations, a
and (3) the issuance of the amendment will not be inimical to the common-
-j defense and security or to the health and safety.of the public.
Principal Contributor:
.T. Reed i
Date: November 4, 1993
.l r
1
-f
- I.,
t 5
1 I
i i
?
.. = -
-...