ML20059G862

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Proposed Tech Specs Re Administrative Changes
ML20059G862
Person / Time
Site: Fort Calhoun Omaha Public Power District icon.png
Issue date: 09/06/1990
From:
OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT
To:
Shared Package
ML20059G856 List:
References
NUDOCS 9009130217
Download: ML20059G862 (4)


Text

n,m e,m m.

+

ji' 1 [m.

j

_r

' /

't-

_>r.

t,...

5 V :-

gE t

-:.4

.t.

O:

5 4e 7 '

!x

~

(

1 l ..

a l, 'f i

,.3i 1

b

'i

.t*

l

' ' ) :.

1.

r ts f

\\

4

,A 9f ~

y, j h k-3 7,

a q.

..,.i

,.1.

.,t(' ' ;

?!

i'h i '} ] t 2

h -

1..

A 3

l i ATTACHMENTA 1

~,i".v c,.

.l..

t

(',h'_ '

k A

w

7., >

s i

e u.. '

'T, ' 4 }~.l j '

.? 1 ~

..(

5 l

s:

m.

l-

.t 1.

y

":p

.k c

'4 I y '.,

.i.

l I

- p l-N 'f !

i e;., '

cu g,

..l,..m 1

t

y d6 i

f

([ E(,i

Tf pe

,I:

'.i

<?

x - g.'

^

s id.

if t.

a t

> h ' e'.'

I yir t

.J, g e '_

t R.

f..t.

t3

,;i U. e

? O,f 1

e

.)-

l' F. '

.?..{.'b

\\

-l

n.,,

a n ' ;; _

& ' 9009130217 900906 v

.r. '

PDR - ADOCK 05000205 J

s e

, -, i PNV 3

glbffL y:

c.

5.01 ADMINIS1RATIVE C6NTROLS

, w y

' S '. 4 :

Trainina Wl>k*

E.4.1 A retraining' and replacement training program for the plant-staff -

~ hall be maintained under the direction of the Manager - Training s

-and shallEmeet or exceed-the requirements.of Section 5.5 of ANSI.

'g N18.1-1971-and 10 CFR Part 55.-

1

5. 4 '. 2 -_ A training. program for the fire brigade shall be maintained under m

the Manager '- Training and shall meet or exceed the requirements' of

- Section 27 of NFPA Code-1975, except that tht'_ meeting frequently may m

be quarterly, b.5; Review and Audit =

5.5.1 Plant' Review Comittee (PRC)

Function-5.5.1.1 ~ - The Plant Review Comittee shall function to advise _ the Manager -

Fort Calhoun Station on all matters related to nuclear safety.

Comoosition g

5.5.1 2:

The official Plant Review Committee shall be composed of the:

Chairman: Manager

. Fort Calhoun Station Member:-

Supervie:r - Operations Member:

-Manager - Training Member:

Supervisor - Maintenance Member:-

Supervisor - System Engineering Member:

Reactor Engineer.

l' Member:-

Supervisor - Radiation Protection DMember:

Supervisor - Chemistry

. Member:.

Assistant Plant Manager l

-Alternates 5.5.1.3 Alternate members shall be appointed in writing by the Plant Review 1 Committee Chairman to serve on a temporary basis; however, no more' S

than two alternates shall participate in Plant Review Committee '

activities at any one time.

Meetina Frecuency C

5!5.1.4; The' Plant Review Committee shall meet at least once per calendar month and as convened by the Plant Review Committee Chairman.

$[

0uorum' 5.5.1.5 A quorum of the Plant Review Committee shall consist of the Chairman and four members. inc1': Jing alternates.

5-3 Amendment No. 9,JS,JE,EL JJE t

y L

+,.

r

)

-.f y

j g

i J

,1-Y

'h e

i t

B T"

+

o f

m 0

1 4

~

f 3%-

3

?

- t.

i E

5 lk,

- 1.,

b

~

P-ATTACHMENT B a

i.=3,,<Ig 4

r Ic 1

1.

r s

3 1

I,

u 14 I) k g

i

+

iI,.

4?

-}

it i

t t

=

l I_ a t,a y

I'-

b

,.-,. i t -

[

=

t i

[-

l-

!. i.'

i

')

s 5

t I

j%-:

)

?

f

. fb In 3 s

=i

!' 1 f

i

,\\*. ? E_

? :,1l'.l i

' {,, '

  • j t'

f s

m

.'w,s..

k 4

I

1 1

A k y 7.- 1'.

i lt

',Ql.

l t

w 4.f, b.

h i)i!

g(t i.

4 i4-g-h 4$,-

o i

a s

j

{-

= l Q 1,,,1,'r 2.

sr

.*,esb

.E 4

nn

[y p.. t..

Qg. x l

l Discussion:

--This request for Amendment of the Technical Specifications addresses-several administrative changes found on page 5-3.

In order to maintain independence-between the Plant Review Committee and its auditing entities the Manager - Safety Review Group and Manager - Quality Assurance and Quality Control are being deleted and the Assistar.t Plant Manager and the Reactor Engineer are being added to maintain breath and depth of technical knowledge.

1 Justification:

LThe Commission has provided guidance concerning the application of the standards for determining whether a significant haz sds considention exists by providing certain examples (48 FR 14870) of amendments that are considered _not likely to.-involve significant hazards consideration.

Example (i) allows for

. purely-administrative change to the Technical Specifications.

The proposed changes relate to' Example -(i) and are purely administrative changes.

-Basis for No Significant Hazards Consideration:

LThis proposed change does not involve significant hazards consideration because operation of; Fort Calhoun Station in accordance with this change would not:

1.

Involve a significant increase in the probability or consequence of an accident previously evaluated. This change is administrative only.

This change should change committee membership'only and would not effect previously' evaluated accidents.

2; Create the possibility of a new or different kird of accident-from any previously evaluated. This change contains.only administrative changes. No new or different modes of operation are proposed for the

plant.

'3.

-Involve ;a significant reduction in the margin of safety.

This change 3

contains only__ administrative changes and, as such, does not result in

a. decrease in the. margin of safety.

Therefore, based on the above considerations, Omaha Public Power District has-

- determined that this change does not involve a significant hazards

-consideration.

k