ML20059G743
| ML20059G743 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Peach Bottom  |
| Issue date: | 09/07/1990 |
| From: | Suh G Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Charnley J GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. |
| References | |
| TAC-76343, NUDOCS 9009130128 | |
| Download: ML20059G743 (4) | |
Text
-..
- - - ~... _ _ _
s
,[
UNITED STATES l
.8 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o
1
- I L
WASHING TON, D. C. 20665 September 7, 1990-Docket No. 50-277 j
Ms. Janice S. Charnley, Manager Fuel-Licensing:
Nuclear Safety and Licensing General Electric Company 175 Curtner Avenue San Jose, California 95125
Dear Ms. Charnley:
SUBJECT:
REQUEST FOR WITHHOLDING INFORMATION FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE PEACHBOTTOMATOMICPOWERSTATION, UNIT 2(T'CNO.76343)
By your affidavit dated April 19, 1990, transmitted in an April 25, 1990 letter from G. A. Hunger, Jr.,' of.the Philadelphia Electric Company-to the NRC. you submitted " Safety Evaluation of the Reuse of Channels for a Second Bundle Lifetime'in Peach Pottom 2, Cycle 8" and requested that the submitted information be withheld from public disclosure pursuant to 10 CFR 2.790.
In addition, by your affidavit dated July 31, 1990, transmitted in an August 3, 1990 letter from G. A. Hunger, Jr...of the Philadelphia Electric Company to a
the NRC, you submitted " Response to NRC Question on PECO Reuse Channel Bow l
Evaluation" and requested that the submitted information be withheld from
~
public disclosure pursuant to 10 CFR 2.790.
You stated that the submitted information should be considered exempt from I
mandatory public disclosure based on the determination that the submitted documentation has been found to contain information which is proprietary and which is customarily held in confidence by General Electric. The information was stated to have been consistently held in confidence by the General Electric Company; nopublic{selosureshavebeenmade; and the information is not available in public sources.
In addition, all disclosures to third parties were stated to have been made pursuant to regulatory provisions or proprietary agreements which provide for maintenance of the information in 1
confidenc5. You further stated that public disclosure of the inf a tion is likely t, cause substantial harm to the competitive position-of the General i
Electric Company and deprive or reduce the availability of profit making i
opportunities because it would provide other parties, including competitors, j
with valuable information, l
We have reviewed your application and the material in accordance with the.
requirements of-10 CFR 2.790 and, on the basis of General. Electric's statements, have determined that the submitted information sought to be withheld contains trade secrets or proprietary commercial information.
Therefore, " Safety Evaluation of the Reuse of Channels for a Second Bundle Lifetime in Peach Bottom 2, Cycle 8" and " Response to NRC Question on PEC0 Geuse Channel Bow Evaluation," marked as proprietary, will be withheld from.
public'disclosurepursuantto10CFR2.790(b)(5)andSection103(b)of.the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amendeo, h
900913012e 900907 PDR ADOCK 05000277 P
PDC y
1 1
'Ms'.'Janice S. Charnley 2-September 7, 1990 Withholding from public inspection shall not affect the right, if any, of persons prcperly and directly concerned to inspect the documents.
If the need arises, *,e may send copies of this information to our consultants working in this arria. We will, of course, ensure that the consultants have signed the-appropriate agreements for handling proprietary information.
If the basis for withholding this information from public inspection should change in the future such that the information could then be meds tyeilable for public inspection, you should promptly notify the NRC. You also should understand that the NRC may have cause to review this determination in the future, for example, if t>.e scope of a Freedom of Information Act request includes your informatbn.
In all review situations, if the NRC makes a determination adverse to the above, you will be notified in advance of any public disclosure.
Sincerely, h4 Gene Y. Su, Project Manager Project Directorate I-2 Division of Reactor Projects - I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation cc: See next page i
L
.------,----n--ev-
-,w.,~ -, - -r -e
.,,w+-,
,,w,.
--,-o,-
.-e 4
y or
,,,,w,,,,.
srv--
-y
i*
i cc:
Troy B. Conner, Jr., Esq.
Single Point of Contact i
1747 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
P. O. Box 11880 1
Masiington, D.C.
20006
_Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17108-1880 s
t Philadelphia Electric Company Mr. Thomas M. Gerusky, Director ATTh: Mr. D. B. Miller, Vice President Bureau of Radiation Protection i
Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Pennsylvania Department of i
Route 1. Box 208 Environmental Resources Delta, Pennsylvania 17314 P. O. Box 2063 j
Harrisbt.rg, Pennsylvania 17120 Philadelphia Electric Company i
ATTN: Regulatory Engineer, Al-25
)
Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Board of Supervisors i
Route 1. Box 208 Peach Bottom Towns'.;ip -
Delta, Pennsylvania 17314 R. D. #1 Delta, Pennsylvania 17314 Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Public Service Cosmiission of Maryland Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Engineering Division v,
P.O. Box 399 AT'N:
Chief Engineer Delta, Pennsylvania 17314 i
231'E. Baltimore Street 4
Baltimore, MD 21202-3486 Regional Administrator, Region I i
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mr. Tom Magette 475 Allendale Road Power Plant Research Program King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406 Department of Natural Resources B-3 i
Mr. Roland Fletcher Tawes State Office Building Department of Environment Annapolis, Maryland 21401 201 West Preston Street l
Baltimore, Maryland 21201 l
Mr. George A. Hunger, 'r.
Director-Licensing, MC 5-2A-5 i
Philadelphia Electric Company l
Nuclear Group Headquarters j
Correspondence Control Desk l
P. O. Box No. 195 Wayne, Pennsylvania 19087-0195 l
l l
1 I
t--
~ -.. -.
Ns. Janice S. Charnley Septesnber 7,1990 Withholding from public inspection shall not affect the right, if any, of persons properly and directly concerned to inspect the documents.
If.the need arises, we may send copies of this information to our consultants working in.
this area. We will, of course, ensure that the consultants have signed the appropriate agreements for handling proprietary information.
If the basis for withholding this information.from public inspection should change in the future such that the information could then be made available for public inspection. you should promptly notify the NRC. You also should understand that the NRC may have cause to review this determination in the future, for example, if the scope of.a Freedom of Information Act request.
4 includes your information.
In'all review situations, if the NRC makes a
'i determination adverse to the above,.you.will be notified in advance of any public disclosure.
Sincerely,
/S/
Gene Y. Suh, Project Manager Project Directorate I-2
[
Division of Reactor Projects - I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation cc: See next page 4
DISTRIBUTION:
@"'Doctehale &
Centril Fils NRC PDR Local.PDR PDI-2 Rdg.
RWessman WButler CHolzle, OGC RJones, SRXB GSuh M0'Brien(2)
DOCUMENT NAME: GE g
y GSuh:ag M[ [
RJo es OGC (leidLI PDI-2/D
/LA PDI-2/PM B C
(\\1 II Wien CHolz WButler g(j/90
$ /3l/90 p//90 a/ C790 tj/g/90 k
f
'i
.