ML20059G017
| ML20059G017 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Point Beach  |
| Issue date: | 10/28/1993 |
| From: | Hansen A Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Link R WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER CO. |
| References | |
| IEB-88-011, IEB-88-11, TAC-M72155, TAC-M72156, NUDOCS 9311050217 | |
| Download: ML20059G017 (3) | |
Text
Oct.ober 28, 1993 r.
Docket Nos.
50-266 DISTRIBUTION and 50-301 Wocket> File JNorberg NRC & Local PDRs OGC Mr. Robert E. Link, Vice President PDIII-3 Reading JShea Nuclear Power Department JRoe EGreenman, RIII Wisconsin Electric Power Company JZwolinski ACRS(10) 231 West Michigan Street, Room P379 JHannon AHansen Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53201 MRushbrook AGody,Jr.
Dear Mr. Link:
SUBJECT:
PRESSURIZER SURGE LINE THERMAL STRATIFICATION, BULLETIN 88-11 (TACS M72155 AND M72156)
By letter dated March 3,1989, and supplemented by letters dated May 8,1989, May 31, 1989, December 18, 1990, June 7, 1991, December 19, 1991, March 25, 1992, and November 24, 1992, you provided your response to NRC Bulletin 88 for the Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2.
Your last response (November 24,1992) stated that you would be in full compliance with the requirements of the Bulletin once the travel allowance for Unit 1 Spring Hanger RC-2 was modified. By telephone conversation with me on October 21, 1993, Michael Baumann of your staff indicated that the modification of Spring Hanger RC-2 was completed during the Unit 1 Spring 1993 outage, thereby bringing both Point Beach units into full compliance with the Bulletin.
The NRC staff previously completed a safety evaluation (SE) of WCAP-12639,.
" Westinghouse Owners Group (WOG) Pressurizer Surge Line Thermal Stratification Generic Detailed Analysis," forwarded to you by letter dated August 16, 1991.
This SE concluded that the analysis methodology used was acceptable. The staff has now completed its review of your plant specific analysis (including the conversation referred to above with Mr. Baumann) and has concluded that it appears acceptable. However, the staff does not intend to complete a detailed SE of your specific analysis since the methodology used in your analysis is the same as that used in the WOG generic detailed analysis.
Based on the above discussion and references, you meet the requirements of Bulletin 88-11. This completes the activities related to TACs M72155 and M72156, though the NRC staff may audit or inspect the implementation at a later date.
L bL h hh 9311050217 931028 PDR ADOCK 05000266 P
PDR g
0 7v0li
Mr. R. E. Link 2
October 28, 1993-Please contact me at (301) 504-1390 if you have any questions regarding this-information.
Sincerely, ORIGINAL SIGNEi> BY Allen G. Hansen, Project Manager-Project Directorate III-3 Division of Reactor Projects III/IV/V Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosure:
F As stated cc w/ enclosure:
See next page
//
OFFICE PD3-3:LA PD3-3:PM [ k EMEBi M / /
PD3-N NAME HR k
AHansen: @ JN[rb rg '
Jf nod DATE Ig/h93 (0/7tI/93
/0/IP/93
/N93 0FFICIAL RECORD DOCUMENT NAME: G:\\PTBEACH\\PBM72155.LTR I
,o o
e Mr. Robert E. Link Point Beach Nuclear Plant Wisconsin Electric Power Company Unit Nos. I and 2 cc:
Ernest L. Blake, Jr.
Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge 2300 N Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20037 Mr. Gregory J. Maxfield, Manager Point Beach Nuclear Plant Wisconsin Electric Power Company 6610 Nuclear Road Two Rivers, Wisconsin 54241 Town Chairman Town of Two Creeks Route 3 Two Rivers, Wisconsin 54241 Chairman Public Service Commission of Wisconsin Hills Farms State Office Building Madison, Wisconsin 53702 Regic..al Administrator, Region III U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 Resident Inspector's Office U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 6612 Nuclear Road Two Rivers, Wisconsin 54241
,