|
---|
Category:GRANTS OF EXEMPTION FROM & EXTENSION TO NRC REQUIREME
MONTHYEARML20059C3721993-12-29029 December 1993 Exemption from DAC Values for Kr-89 & Xe-137 in Table 1 of App a to 10CFR20.Approves Use of Proposed Values in Request When Determining Whether Area Requires Posting as Airborne Radioactivity Area 1993-12-29
[Table view] Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20216F4891999-09-17017 September 1999 Comment Supporting NEI Comments Re Proposed Rules 50 & 72 Re Certain Reporting Requirements for Nuclear Power Reactors. Expresses Concern Re Proposed Reporting Requirement 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(ii)(c) Re Significantly Degraded Component ML20206A0541999-04-26026 April 1999 Memorandum & Order.* All Petitioners to Intervene Have Withdrawn Their Petition,Proceeding Terminated.With Certificate of Svc.Served on 990426 ML20205S0031999-04-23023 April 1999 Affidavit of JW Yelverton Supporting Proposed License Transfer & Conforming Amends.Util Requests That Designated Documents Be Withheld from Public Disclosure,Per 10CFR2.790 (a)(4) & 10CFR9.17(a)(4) ML20203G7821999-02-16016 February 1999 Petition of Local 369 & 387,Utility Workers Union of America,AFL-CIO for Leave to Intervene & Request Hearing.* Requests That Hearing Be Scheduled on Commission Consideration to Approve Transfer.With Certificate of Svc ML20153C1411998-09-20020 September 1998 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR2 & 51 on Subpart M Re Transfer of Operating License ML20100M5251996-03-0101 March 1996 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Rept Requirements for Unauthorized Use of Licensed Radioactive Matl.Proposed Rule Change Wording Concerning What Conditions Must Be Met to Require Reporting Inexact ML20101B9931996-03-0101 March 1996 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Reporting Requirements for Unauthorized Use of Licensed Radioactive Matls BECO-95-125, Comment Supporting Pr 10CFR60,72,73 & 75 Re Safeguards for Spent Nuclear Fuel1995-12-14014 December 1995 Comment Supporting Pr 10CFR60,72,73 & 75 Re Safeguards for Spent Nuclear Fuel ML20093B5971995-10-0303 October 1995 Comment on Proposed Bulletin 95-XX & Reg Guide DG-1038, Debris Clogging of BWR ECCS Suction Strainers. Endorses BWROG Comments ML20086A8791995-06-14014 June 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR73 Re NRC Initiative to Eliminate Requirement to Post Security at Primary Containment Entrance During Refueling & Major Maint Periods ML20082Q5511995-04-21021 April 1995 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR170 & 171 Re Fee Schedules for FY95 Revisions.Endorses NEI Comments ML20082M3251995-04-14014 April 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Draft Policy Statement Re Freedom of Employees in Nuclear Industry to Raise Concerns W/O Fear of Retaliation ML20078L2151995-02-0303 February 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Shutdown & Low Power Operations for Nuclear Power Reactors ML20078S6631994-12-19019 December 1994 Comment Supporting Proposed GL Re Reconsideration of NPP Security Requirements for an Internal Threat ML20076L2561994-10-24024 October 1994 Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR2 Re Reexamination of NRC Enforcement Policy.Endorses Response Submitted by Nuclear Energy Institute ML20062M4241994-01-0303 January 1994 Comment Supporting NUMARC Position on Proposed Rule Re Protection Against Malevolent Use of Vehicles at NPPs ML20059C3721993-12-29029 December 1993 Exemption from DAC Values for Kr-89 & Xe-137 in Table 1 of App a to 10CFR20.Approves Use of Proposed Values in Request When Determining Whether Area Requires Posting as Airborne Radioactivity Area BECO-93-166, Comment Supporting NUMARC Petition for Rulemaking to Amend 10CFR21,PRM 21-21993-12-28028 December 1993 Comment Supporting NUMARC Petition for Rulemaking to Amend 10CFR21,PRM 21-2 ML20058P1811993-12-14014 December 1993 Director'S Decision 93-20 Denying Petition to Delaying Startup Until Hardware Modifications Designed to Eliminate Errors in Reactor water-level Measurement Made ML20058D6561993-11-19019 November 1993 Director'S Decision Under 10CFR2.206 Denying Petition Requesting That NRC Reconsider 910730 Decision Giving Unanimous Approval of Task Force Recommendation Re Reasonable Assurance Finding Re EP for Plant ML20057C1281993-09-13013 September 1993 Memorandum & Order (Termination of Proceeding).* W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 930916 ML20057C0951993-09-13013 September 1993 Memorandum & Order (Termination of Proceeding).* Informs of Petitioner Withdrawal of Motion to Intervene & Request for Hearing,Therefore Board Terminates & Dismisses Proceeding Herein.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 930914 ML20057A1531993-09-0202 September 1993 NRC Staff Response to Ma Atty General Withdrawal of Motion to Intervene & Request for Hearing.* NRC Does Not Object to Atty General Withdrawal.Licensing Board Should Issue Order Dismissing Proceeding.W/Certificate of Svc ML20056G5081993-08-26026 August 1993 Commonwealth of Ma Atty General Withdrawal of Motion to Intervene & Request for Hearing.* W/Certificate of Svc ML20056E6871993-08-13013 August 1993 Memorandum & Order (Extension of Time).* Petitioner Suppl W/ Contentions Should Be Filed by 930827 & Licensee Response to Suppl Should Be Filed within 10 Days Thereafter.W/ Certificate of Svc.Served on 930813 ML20046D0251993-08-11011 August 1993 Joint Motion to Extend Date for Filing Petitioners Contentions.* Parties Jointly Request That Board Extend Date for Filing Petitioner Contentions from 930813 to 930827. W/Certificate of Svc ML20056C8601993-07-16016 July 1993 Memorandum & Order (Extension of Time).* Petitioner Suppl W/ Contentions Should Be Filed by 930813,util Response to Suppl within 10 Days After Svc & NRC Response to Suppl within 15 Days After Svc.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 930719 ML20056C8971993-07-15015 July 1993 Joint Motion to Extend Date for Filing Petitioners Contentions.* W/Certificate of Svc ML20045D2201993-06-0808 June 1993 Response of Boston Edison Co to Commonwealth of Ma Atty General Request for Hearing & Petition to Intervene.* Util Will Defer Further Response Until Petitioner Files Suppl Re Specific Contentions.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20045D2271993-06-0808 June 1993 Response of Boston Edison Co to Ma Atty General Request for Hearing & Petition to Intervene.* W/Certificate of Svc & Notices of Appearance ML20045A6721993-05-27027 May 1993 State of Ma Atty General Request for Hearing & Petition to Intervene Re Plant Proposed Amend to License DPR-35 Increasing Allowed Fuel Assembly Storage Cells.* W/Certificate of Svc ML20045A6741993-05-27027 May 1993 Notice of Appearance.* Notice of Appearance of Undersigned for State of Ma Atty General BECO-92-135, Comments on Proposed NRC Generic Communication,Augmented Inservice Insp Requirements for Mark I & Mark II Steel Containments,Refueling Cavities & Associated Drainage Sys1992-12-21021 December 1992 Comments on Proposed NRC Generic Communication,Augmented Inservice Insp Requirements for Mark I & Mark II Steel Containments,Refueling Cavities & Associated Drainage Sys ML20115A6581992-10-0505 October 1992 Comments on Proposed Changes to SALP Program BECO-92-073, Comment Opposing Draft Rev 3 to Reg Guide 01.0091992-07-10010 July 1992 Comment Opposing Draft Rev 3 to Reg Guide 01.009 BECO-92-072, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Receipt of Byproduct & SNM1992-07-10010 July 1992 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Receipt of Byproduct & SNM ML20086K8791991-10-31031 October 1991 Petitions Commission to Reconsider 910730 Approval of Task Force Recommendation Stating That NRC Did Not Need to Reconsider NRC Reasonable Assurance Finding Re Emergency Preparedness for Pilgrim Station ML20135A4581991-06-12012 June 1991 Transcript of 910612 Meeting in Plymouth,Ma Re Pilgrim Task Force Public Hearing.Pp 1-148.W/certificate & Title Page BECO-91-067, Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR71,170 & 171, Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery1991-05-13013 May 1991 Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR71,170 & 171, Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery ML19332G5121989-12-0101 December 1989 Comment on Draft Reg Guide,Task DG-1001, Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. Util Endorses Nuclear Power Industry Comments & NUMARC Position ML20235A9561988-12-0909 December 1988 Transcript of 881209 Meeting in Rockville,Md W/Public Officials Having Responsibility for Emergency Planning for Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant.Related Info Encl.Pp 1-185 ML20205E1531988-10-14014 October 1988 Transcript of 881014 Meeting in Rockville,Md Re Discussion/ Possible Vote on Facility Restart.Pp 1-104.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20205J3531988-10-0505 October 1988 Transcript of 881005 Meeting in Rockville,Md Re Status of Readiness for Restart of Facility.Pp 1-94 ML20155D9391988-10-0505 October 1988 Second Interim Director'S Decision DD-88-17 Under 10CFR2.206 Re Request for Proceeding to Modify,Suspend or Revoke Ol.Portion of Petition Re Mgt Issues Denied.Portion Re Emergency Preparedness Issues to Be Addressed Later ML20206G9181988-09-29029 September 1988 Transcript of NRC 880929 Technical Meeting in Plymouth,Ma Re Review of Proposed Restart of Facility & NRC 881005 Meeting W/Util in Rockville,Md Re Readiness of Restart ML20153H0381988-08-26026 August 1988 Transcript of ACRS Ad Hoc Subcommittee on Pilgrim Restart 880826 Meeting in Plymouth,Ma.Pp 1-232.Related Documentation Encl ML20235T8761988-08-25025 August 1988 Rev 0 to Pilgrim Station Evacuation Time Estimates & Traffic Mgt Plan Update.* Apps A,B & M Encl ML20235T7301988-08-15015 August 1988 Rev 4 to Massachussetts Civil Defense Agency Area II Radiological Emergency Response Plan for Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station.* ML20247N7531988-07-28028 July 1988 Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-53 Requesting NRC Action to Review Undue Risk Posed by BWR Thermal Hydraulic Instability.Nrr Should Issue Order Requiring All GE BWRs to Be Placed in Cold Shutdown for Stated Reasons ML20235T6901988-07-28028 July 1988 Rev 5 to City of Taunton Radiological Emergency Response Plan for Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station.* Related Info Encl 1999-09-17
[Table view] |
Text
F, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the Matter of ) !
}
BOSTON EDISON COMPANY ) Docket No. 50-293
)
(Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station) )
EXEMPTION I. !
The Boston Edison Company (BEco, the licensee) is the holder of Facility Operating License No. DRP-35, which authorizes the operation of Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station (the facility), at steady state power levels not in excess of 1998 megawatts thermal. This facility is a boiling water reactor located in Plymouth, Massachusetts. The license provides, among other things, l that Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station is subject to all rules, regulations, and .
orders of the Commission now or hereafter in effect.
II. ;
BEco is preparing to implement the Final Rule on Standards for Protection Against Radiation, 10 CFR Part 20, on January 1, 1994. Section ;
20.1902(d) of the Final Rule specifies posting requirements for airborne radioactivity areas (ARA) and Section 20.1003 defines an ARA based on the derived air concentrations (DAC) values of radionuclides provided in Table 1 of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 20.
III.
By letter' dated September 13, 1993, the licensee requested an exempt' ion, pursuant to 10 CFR 20.2301, from the DAC values for Kr-89 and Xe-137 in Table 1 of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 20 and provided alternative values in order to 9401050136 931229 PDR ADOCK 05000293 p PDR
use more appropriate specific DAC values for these radionuclides. The requested exemption would constitute a permanent change to the Final Rule values for Kr-89 and Xe-137 for the facility.
Based on the NRC staff evaluation, it was calculated that the dose equivalent, in units of rem, that corresponds to an exposure of 2,000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> at the requested DACs of 10 uCi/cm for Kr-89 and 10'5 uti/cm for Xe-137 is below ,
the limiting dose values used for determining the radionuclide-specific DAC values in Appendix B to 10 CFR Parts 20.001 - 20.2402 (and in Federal Guidance Report No. 11). Therefore, the staff finds the specific DAC values acceptable alternatives for use in place of the generic DAC value of 10'T uCi/ml for these radionuclides when determining whether an area is, and requires posting as, an airborne radioactivity area.
IV.
Accordingly, the Commission has determined that, pursuant to i 10 CFR 20.2301, the requested exemption from the DAC values for Kr-89 and I Xe-137 in Table 1 of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 20 and use of the values "
specified in the licensee's request is authorized by law, and will not result I in undue hazard to life or property. The exemption request has been evaluated i in a Safety Evaluation dated December 29, 1993.
Therefore, the Commission hereby grants BECo an exemption from the values in the Final Rule for Kr-89 and Xe-137 -and approves the use of the proposed values in their request when determining whether an area is, and F
b
{
requires posting as, an airborne radioactivity area. This exemption constitutes a permanent change to the applicability of the Regulations in this j regard for the facility.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.32, the Commission has determined that the granting of this Exemption will have no significant impact on the quality of the human environment (58 FR 68672 dated December 28,1993).
l This exemption is effective upon issuance.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ti O.wbv Jose A. Calvo, Acting Director Division of Reactor Projects - I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation l
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 29th day of December 1993.
1 i
l I
i
,