ML20059B612
| ML20059B612 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fort Calhoun  |
| Issue date: | 07/31/1990 |
| From: | OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20059B610 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9008290190 | |
| Download: ML20059B612 (119) | |
Text
.. _ _...
FORT CALHOUN STATION PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
- JULY, 1990 2
i Prepared by:
Production Engineering Division System Engineering h
OMAHA PUBLIC PCWER DISTRICT FORT CALHOUN STATION PERFORMANCE INDICATORS PREPARED BY:
PRODUCTION ENGINEERING DIVlSION SYSTEM ENGINEERING JULY, 1990
ousua ) m n - staua...
d A wisdsm wnd sownd judgmwnl...
it w w Gfztinra, ecmur-Q esrnandanerl...
it w w u>wp. sj Cfs...it w d4 %,A
$ Gw ju' si kann, wva, time. ot w irvns-dimtal, ni % mufL ej uxlevnal pume,, it w sw. m sclj wa a w h u>c. we wnd % @ wnd sehpcit~n, thal come. fu>rn, &cong L $ twnd sj pawn., nl just w daung % & Garry..
NY E
l
c
..t
.]
-)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
.b Distribution....................
iv i
Preface......................
1 Purpose........................
3 6 cope....*...................
4 Adverse Trend Report.................
5 i
i Indicators Needing increased Management......
6 Attention IndextoSafetyEnhancementProgram(SEP)
Indicators..
8 Index to Performance Indicator Graphs.......
10 Performance Indicator Graphs............
15 l
Significant. Items of Interest...........
92 j
s Definitions...................... 93 1
Basis for Establishing 1989 Performance Indicator Soals................
107 Operating. Cycles'and Refueling Outage Dates...
109 c.- {
Production and Operation Records.........
110 i
Data Source...................
111 I
References....................
115 1
I L
o r
?
f.
l=
1-I l
l
.i
DISTRIBUTION V. W. Ant.erson D. C. Gorence R. J. Mueller R. L. Andrews R. E. Gray W. L. Neal W. R. Bateman M. J. Guinn J. B. Newhouse K. L. Delek E. R. Gundal M. W. Nicho~rs S. M. Bera A. L. Gurtis C. W. Norris A. D. Bilau R. H. Guy J. T. O'Connor B. H. Blome R. M. Hawkins W. W. Orr C. N. Bloyd M. C. Hendrickson L. L. Parent J. P. Bobba R. R. Henning T. L. Patterson C. E. Boughter K. R. Henry R. L. Phelps M. A. Breuer J. B. Herman T. M. Reisdorff C. J. Brunnert G. J. Hill B. A. Reneaud M. W. Butt K. C. Holthaus A. W. Richard C. A. Carlson L. G. Huliska T. J. Sandene J. W. Chase R. L. Jaworski C. A. Sayre G. R. Chatfield R. A. Johansen B. A. Schmidt t
A. G. Christensen J. W. Johnson S. T. Schmitz
- 0. J. Clayton W. C. Jones F. C. Scofield R. P. Clemens J. D. Kecy L. G. Sealock R. G. Conner J. D. Keppler H. J. Sefick J. L. Connolley D. D. Kloock P.
Sepcenko G. M. Cook J. C. Knight J. W. Shannon M. R. Core D. M. Kobunski R. W. Short S. R. Crites G. J. Krause C. F. Simmons D.' W. Dale L. J. Kripal
- 2. L. Skaggs R. C. DeMeulmeester J. B. Kuhr F. K. Smith R. D. DeYoung L. T. Kusek R. L. Sorenson D. C. Dietz L. E. Labs D. E. Spires D. E. Dirrim M. P. Lazar K. E. Steele K. S. Dowdy R. C. Learch W.
Steele J. A. Drahota S. E. Lee H. F. Sterba T. R. Dukarski R. E. Lewis R. K. Stultz R. G. Ellis R. C. Liebentritt G. A. Teeple R. G. Eurich C. J. Linden M. A. Tesar H. J. Faulhaber B. R. Livingston P. L. Thompson M. A. Ferdig J. M. Lofshult J. W. Tills V. H. Frahm J. H. MacKinnon D. R. Trausch F. F. Franco G. D. Mamoran P. R. Turner H. K. Fraser J. W. Marcil J. M. Uhland J. F. W. Friedrichsen N. L. Marfice C. F. Vanecek R. M. Fussell D. J. Matthews G. L. Van Osdel S. K. Gambhir J. M. Mattice L. P. Walling J. K. Gasper T. J. McIvor J. M. Waszak W. G. Gates R. F. Mehaffey W. O. Weber M. O. Gautier R. A. Miser G. R. Williams J. M. Glantz K. J. Morris J. Willrett J. T. Gleason D. C. Mueller
... Woerner L. V. Goldberg iv
PREFACE PERFOR4ANCE INDICATORS REP 0(T IMPROVEMENTS Two indicators have been changt:d. The Check Valve Failure Rate Indicator is in the Maintenance Sectir n and the in-Line Chemistry Instruments e
Out-of-Service Indicator is '.n the Chemistry and Radiological Protection Section.
The Check Valve Failure Rate Indicator found on page 43 has been changed. This indicator now shows the current Fort Calhoun Station check valve f ailure rate. Previously, the Fort Calhoun Station check valve f ailure rate was shown as three months behind the reporting month. The Check Valve Failure Rate Indicator still shows the industry check valve failure rate which is three months behind the Performance Indicators Report.
The In-Line Chemistry Instruments Out-of-Service Indicator found on page 47 has been changed. The Fort Calhoun goal of 3 out-of-service chemistry instruments has been changed to 6 out-of-service chemistry instruments.
Six out-of-service chemistry instruments constitute 10% of all the chemistry instruments which are counted for this indicator.
i PURPOSE I
This progrim titled "Perf ormance Indicators" is intended to provide selected Fort Calhoun plant performance information to OPPD's personnel responsible for optimizing unit performance. The 1
information is presented in a way that provides ready l
identification of trends and a means to track progress toward l
reaching corporate goals. The information can be used for assessing and monitoring Fort Calhoun's plant performance, with emphasis on safety and reliability. Some performance indicators show company goals or industry information. This information can be used for comparison or as a means of promoting pride and motivation.
L P -
4 SCOPE i
~[
In order for the Performance Indicator Program to be effective, the following guidelines were followed while implementing this program:
r l
Select the data which most effectively monitors Fort Calhoun's' performance in key areas.
t t
t Present the data in a straight forward graphical format using averaging and smoothing techniques.
Include established corporate goals and industry information for comparison.
Develop formal definitions for each performance parameter.
This will ensure consistency in future reports and allow comparison with industry averages where appropriate.
Comments and input are encouraged to ensure that this program l
L is tailored to address the areas which are most meaningful to the people using the report.
t
p-f ADVERSE TREND REPORT The Adverse Trend Report explains the cor.ditions under which certain indicators are showing adverse trends. An indicator that is defined as an Adverse Trena is one in which the data represented for three months is showing deficiencies for that particular indicator.
Indicators which show an apparent three month decline, but are ng1 considered an adverse trend, will display an explanation which defines the reason why an adverse trend does not exist.
Number of Out-of-Service Control Room Instruments Indicator - Page 36 The number of cut-of-service control room instruments has been increasing since May, 1990. The increase in the number of i
out-of-service control room instruments is due to an Engineering evaluation of the INPO definition of out-of-service control room instruments.
The Fort Calhoun Station is now reporting out-of-service control room instruments as requested by the INPO definition. Another reason for the increase in the number of out-of-service control room instruments is the large number of instrument deficiencies being added each month.
Egrsonnel Turnover Rate - Page 78 The turnover rate for the Nuclear Operations Division (N0D) and the Production Engineering (PED) are higher than the OPPD corporate turnover rate. These high turnover rates are due to 28 resignations from NOD which occurred within the last 12 months and 9 resignations from PED which occurred within the last 12 months.,
INDICATORS NEEDING INCREASED MANAGEMENT ATTENTION This section' lists the indicators which show inadequacies as compared to the OPPD goal and indicators which show inadequacies as compared to the industry upper quartile. The indicators will be compared to the industry upper quartile as relevant to that indicator.
Unp_bnnedSafetySystemActuations-Page18 n
The Fort Calhoun Station has experienced an unplanned safety system actuation during_1990. This unplanned actuation was a start and load of DG-2 due to an it'sJvertent tria of backup lockout relay 86/2BF5. The Fort Calhoun goal for uaplanned safety system actuathns during 1990 was set at zero actuations.
Gross Heat Rate - Page 19 The year to date gross heat rate for the Fort Calhoun Station is currently above the Fort Calhoun goal of 10,200 BTV/KWH. The gross heat rate values for January and February were high due to the fact that the first stage of the high pressure turbine was removed during the months of l
January and February. During the months of May and June, startup from the i
1990 Refueling Outage and various derates caused the gross heat rate values for these months to be higher than the Fort Calhoun goal, Eouivalent Availability Factor - Page 20 The 12 month average equivalent availability factor (EAF) is currently below the Fort Calheun goal of 65.4%. The time in which the plant was i
unavailable for electricity generation due to the 1990 Refueling Outage has caused the 12 month average EAF to slide below the Fort Calhoun goal.
l The 12 month average EAF is expected to increase as the time that the plant is available for electricity generation increases.
DG Reliability last IN) Demands - Page 29 l
l The diesel generator start and load reliability of DG-1 and DG-2 is currently below the Fort Calhoun goal of 95%. This is due to the fact that diesel generator DG-1 has experienced 7 start and load failures in its last 100 demands and diesel generator DG-2 has experienced 6 start and load failures in the last 100 demands on the unit.
DG Reliability last 20 Demands - Page 30 The start and load reliability of diesel generator DG-1 is below the Fort Calhoun goal of 95% reliability. This low start and load reliability for l
diesel generator DG-1 is due to two start and load failures which j
occurred in July, 1990. These two failures were caused by high engine j
coolant temperature problems.
p INDICATORS NEEDING INCREASED MANAGEMENTATTENTION(CONTINUED)
Number of Out-of-Service Control Room instruments - Page 36 The number of out-of-service control room instruments has been above the Fort Calhoun goal of 7 out-of-service control room instruments and above the industry upper quartile value of 7 out-of-service control room instruments since November of 1989.
Check Valve Failure Rate - Page 43 The Fort Calhoun check valve failure rate is e vently above the industry check valve f ailure rate. TM reason for the high check valve failure rate is that the plant is performing mainte'ance on check valves which have not been checked for failures before. The cLeck valve failure rate is expected to decrease as the check valves are maintained and monitored through the Check Valve Program.
Secondary System Chemistry - Page 44 The Secondary System Chemistry Performance Index (CPI) for the month of June is above the industry upper quartile value of 0.20. The high CPI for June was due to startup after the 1990 Refueling Outage and various power fluctuations which occurred during June. The CPI for the Fort Calhoun Station may also be higher than the industry upper quartile value because the plant uses morpholine for ph control.
Total Skin and Clothina Contaminations - Page 50 The total number of skin and clothing contaminations has been above the Fort Calhoun goal of 150 contaminations since the month of April,1990. The total number of skin and clothing contaminations has been above the industry u)per quartile value of 129 contaminations since the month of March,1990. The ligh number of skin and clothing contaminations during the months of March and April, 1990, was due to increased activity in the Radiation Controlled Area (RCA)associatedwiththe1990RefuelingOutage, j
Gaseous Radioactive Waste Beina Discharced to the Enviromnent 9 age 54 i
A total of 164.4 curies of gaseous radioactive was'e was released to the l
environment from January througl December of 1989. The Fort Calhoun goal is 145 curies for this indicator.
Temoorary Modifications (Excludina Scaffoldina) - Page 72 The number of temporary modifications which are installed in the plant is currently above the Fort Calhoun goal of 15 temporary modifications. The number of temporary modifications which are installed in the plant has been decreasing and is expected to keep decreasing. l
I SAFETYENHANCEMENTPROGRAM(SEP)
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS The purpose of the Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Performance Indicators pages is to list the indicators related to the SEP items with parameters that can be trended.
SEP Reference Number 15 - Increase HPES and IR Accountability E121 Through Use of Performance Indicators Procedural Noncompliance Incidents (Maintenance)........
38 Total Skin and Clothing Contaminations.............
50 Recordable Injury Cases Frequency Rate.............
76 t
Number of Personnel Errors Reported in LER's..........
77 CAR's Issued versus Significant CAR's Issued versus NRC Violations Issued versus LER's Reported..........
91 SEP Reference Number 20 - Quality Audits and Surveil!ance Programs are Evaluated, Improved in Depth and Strengthened CAR's Issued versus Significant CAR's Issued versus NRC Violations Issued versus LER's Reported..........
91 SEP Reference Number 21 - Develop and Conduct Safety System Functional Inspections t
CAR's Issued versus Significant CAR's Issued versus NRC Violations Issued versus LER's Reported..........
91 SEP Reference Number 24 - Complete Staff Studies Staffing Level.........................
79 SEP Reference Number 26 - Evaluate and Implement Station Standards for Safe Work Practice Requirements Disabling Injury Frequency Rate................
24 s
Recordable Injury Cases Frequency Rate.............
76 SEP Reference Number 36 - Reduce Corrective Non-Outage Backlog Maintenance Work Order Backlog (CorrectiveNon-OutageMaintenance) 39 l
JEP Reference Number 41 - Develop and Implement a Preventive Maintenance s
Schedule Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance............
34 Preventive Maintenance Items Overdue..............
35 l l
l
SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM (SEP)
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (CONTINUED)
SEP Referente Number 43 - Implement'the Check Valve Test Program Check Valve Failure Rate....................
43 SLP Reference Number 44 - Compliance With and Use of Procedures Procedural Noncompliance Incidents (Maintenance)........
38 SEP Reference Number 52 - Establish Supervisory Accountability for Workers Radiological Practices Radiological Work Practices Program...............
52
~
SEP Reference Number 54 - Complete Implementation of Radiological Enhancement Program Personnel Radiation Exposure (Cumulative)............
22 Volume of Low-Level Solid Radioactive Waste...........
23 Total Skin and Clothing Contaminations.............
50 Decontaminated Auxiliary Building................
51
}.EP Reference Number 58 - Revise Physical Security Training and Procedure Program Loggable/ Reportable Incidents (Security)............
56 Security Incident Breakdown 57 Security System Failures....................
58 SEP Reference Number 60 - Improve Controls Over Surveillance Test Program 1
Number of Missed Surveillance Tests Resulting in Licensee Event Reports.....................
40 1
}EP Reference Number 61 - Modify Computer Program to Correctly Schedule Surveillance Tests
[
Number of Missed Surveillance Tests Resulting in Licensee Event Reports.....................
40 l
l SEP Reference Number 62 - Establish Interim System Engineers j
Temporary Modifications.....................
72 Engineering Assistance Request Priority Breakdown........
73 i
SAFETYENHANCEMENTPROGRAM(SEP) a-o PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (CONTINUED)
SEP Reference Number 62 - Establich Interim System Engineers (Continued)
Engineering Change Notice Status................
74 Engineering Change Notice Breakdown...............
75 f
SEP Reference Number 71 - Improve Controls over Temporary Modifications Temporary Modifications
....................72
+
e i
e L
t
.g.
l-
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS INDEX TO GRAPHS INDUSTRY KEY PARAMETERS-Forced Outage Rate........................
16 Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scrams While Critical........
17 Unplanned Safety System Actuations................
18 Gro s s He a t Rate.........................
19 Equivalent Availability Factor.................
20 Fuel Reliability Indicator...................
21 Personnel Radiation Exposure (Cumulative)............
22 Volune of Low-level Solid Radioactive Waste...........
23 Disabling Injury Frequency Rate.................. 24 l
o I
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
,i INDEX TO GRAPHS (CONTINUED)
OPERATIONS Station Net Generation.....................
15 Forced Outage Rate.......................
16 i
i Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scrams While Critical........
17 i
Unplanned Safety System Actuations...............
18 Gross Heat Rate.........................
19 Equivalent Availability Factor.................
20 Fuel Reliability Indicator...................
21 1
Daily Thermal Output......................
25 Equipment Forced Outages per 1000 Critical Hours........
26 f
Operations and Maintenance Budget................
27 Document Review.......................... 28 MAINTENANCE Diesel Generator Reliability (100 Demands)...........
29 j
l Diesel Generator Reliability (20 Demands)............
30 Age of Outstanding Maintenance Work Orders...........
31 Maintenance Work Order Breakdown................
32 Corrective Maintenance Backlog >3 Fonths Old..........
33 Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance............
34 l
Preventive Maintenance Items Overdue..............
35 Number of Out-of-Service Control Room Instruments........
36 Maintenance Overtime......................
37 Procedural Noncompliance Incidents (Maintenance)........
38 Maintenance Work Order Backlog (Corrective Non-Outage).....
39 Number of Surveillance Tests Resulting in Licensee Event Reports.....................
40 __
f i
i PERFORMANC'iIGICATORS p
INDEX TO GRAPHS (CONTINUED) i MAINTENANCE (CONTINUED 1 Number of Nuclear Plant Reliability Data System (NPRDS)
Reportable failures.......................
41 Maintenance Effectiveness....................
42 Check Valve Failure Rate....................
43
.Q!QRSTRY AND RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION i
Personnel Radiation Exposure (Cumulative)............
22 Volume of Low-level Solid Radioactive Waste...........
23 Secondary System Chemistry...................
44 Primary System Chemistry - Percent of Hours Out of Limit....
45 Auxiliary Systems Chemistry Hours Outside Station Limits....
46 In-Line Chemistry Instruments Out-of-Service..........
47 Hazardous Waste Produced....................
48 Maximum Individual Radiation Exposure..............
49 Total Skin and Clothing Contaminations.............
50 Decontaminated Auxiliary Building................
51 Radiological Work Practices Program...............
52 Number of Hot Spots.......................
53 Gaseous Radioactive Waste Being Discharged to the Environ ent..
54
(
Liquid Radioactive Waste Being Discharged to the Environment..
55 SECURITY Loggable/ Reportable Incidents (Security)............
56 Security Incident Breakdown...................
57 Security System Failures....................
58 MATERIALS AND OUTSIDE SERVICES Amount of Work On Hold Awaiting Parts..............
59
.a.
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS INDEX TO GRAPHS (CONTINUED)
MATERIAL AND OUTSIDE SERVICES (CONTINVED)
Spare Parts Inventory Value...................
60 Spare Parts I s sued.......................
61 Inventory Accuracy.......................
62 Stockout Rate..........................
63 Warehouse Receipts.......................
64 Warehouse Issues........................
65 Warehouse Returns.........
66 Material Requests Awaiting Approval.,.............
67 Expedited Purchases........................-68 Invoice Breakdown........................
69 Material Request Planning....................
70 DESIGN ENGINEERING Outstanding Modifications....................
71 Temporary Modifications......................
72 Engineering Assistance Request (EAR) Priority Breakdown....
73 Engineering Change Notice Status................
74 Engineering Change Notice Breakdow-
..............75 INDUSTRIAL SAFETY Disab ling Injury Frequency Rate.................
24 Recordable injury Cases Frequency Rate.............
76 HUMAN RESOURCES l
Number of Personnel Errors Reported in LERs......,....
77 o
l Personnel Turnover Rate.....................
78 Sta f f ing Level.........................
79
, i
[,
1 PERf0RMANCE 1:JICATORS i
INDEX TO GRAPHS (CONTINUED)
TkAINING AND OUALIFICATION SRO License Examination Pass Ratio...............
80 R0 License Examination Pass Ratio................
81 License Candidate Exams.....................
82 Hotlines............................
83 Classroom (Instructor) Hours..................
84 Total Hours of Student Training.................
85 OVALITY ASSURANCE Number of Violations per 1000 Inspection Hours.........
86 Cumulative Violations and Non-Cited Violations (NCV's).....
87 Percent of CAR's Greater Than Six Months Old..........
88 Overdue and Extended Corrective Action Reports.........
89 i
Corrective Action Reports Current Status............
90 CAR's Issued versus Significant CAR's Issued versus.......
91 NRC Violations Issued versus LERs Reported t
l l
l I
I l-i.
l l l l
l 500000 -
R Station Net Generation 400000-M e
9 a
W 300000-a t
t' i
H 200000-o u
r S
100000-t 1
0
~
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 I
STATION NET GENERATION-This indicator shows the net generation of the Fort Calhoun Station for the reporting l
month.
During the month of July,1990, a net total of 350,967.2 MWH was generated by the Fort Calhoun Station.
l The net generation totals for the months of March and April were zero and the net generation total for the month of May was low due to the plant being shutdown for the 1990 Refueling Outage.
l l
Adverse Trend:
None
. l I
t,..
o.
- Forced Outage Rate j
6 G-Fort Calhoun Goal 43 Industry Upper 10 Percentile
)
5-GOOD 4-4 R
a t
3-1 e
2 O --- --- G----O - -- G--- @ -- - G -- - G --- O -- - G--- -O -- -O j
1.4 I1-1 0 -l
"' 8 G-G O-O 0
0
'87
'88 '89 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul 1989 1990 FORCED OUTAGE RATE The forced outage rate was reported as 1.2% for the month of July, 1990.
The last forced outage at Fort Calhoun occurred in September of 1989.
The industry upper ten percentile value for the forced outage rate is 0.25%.
The 1990 goal for forced outage rate is 2.4%
and is based on seven days of forced outage time. The basis for establishing the 1990 performance goals can be found on page 107.
Adverse Trend:
None
= - -
a
o I*
^
\\
r i
5-E Reactor Scram.
l-G-Fort Calhoun Goal
-& Industry Upper 10 Percentile i
4-
)
S 3
GOOD c
r 4
i a
m 2-1 1
1 1-0---- + --- G -- - e---- e-- -- o ---- o ---- o ---- o ----o -- --o ----O j
I0 0
0 0
^
~
~
'86 '87 '88 '89 AYg SYp OYt NYv de'c JYn Feb MIr Apr MYy JYn Jul i
1989 1990 UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL There were no unplanned automatic reactor scrams in July. It has been 1,490 days since the last unplanned automatic reactor scram t
which occurred on July 2, 1986.
The 1990 goal for unplanned automatic reactor scrams while critical has been set at 1.
The industry upper ten percentile value is zero scrams per unit on an annual basis. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently in the l
upper. ten percentile of nuclear plant performance in this area.
l Adverse Trend:
None 1
l',.
Jt
.=
op
'4 4-Safety System Actuations
-G-Fort Calhoun Goal
& Industry Upper 10 Percentile l
A c
t u
GOOD k
2-
+
o n
s 1
1-
&--- G----O ----&--- Q i
\\
l
\\
t
\\
O O
O
\\
- 4' 0
s O
O O
O m
'87 '88 '89 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul 1989 1990 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS There were no unplanned safety system actuations during the-month of July, 1990.
The 1990 goal for the number of unplanned safety system actuations is zero.
This goal is based on past performance at the Fort Calhoun Station.
The industry upper ten percentile value for the number of unplanned safety system actuations per year is zero.
Adverse Trend:
None
, i
' ' = -
1 IMonthly Gross Heat Rate
- Year to Cate Gross Heat Rate e Fort Calhoun Goal O Industry Upper 10 Percentile GOOD i
+
i 12000-B i'
T U
/
i K 11000-W 10520 H 10270 j
10014 G----& -- G--- G ---O O
O- -- G ---G ---G --- & ---O 10000-O D- -O-G-G
- G G -- G - O 0 - 0 I
'87
'88 '89 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct' Nov Dec 1990 i
GROSS HEAT RATE The gross heat rate for the Fort Calhoun Station was reported as 10,315 BTV/KWH during the month of July. The gross heat rate for the month of July was above the Fort Calhoun goa I of 10,200 BTU /KWH due to seasonal river water temperature increases.
The 1990 year to date gross heat rate value is 10,447 BTV/KWH. The 1990 goti is 10,200 BTU /KWH. The year to date gross heat rate is above the Fort Calhoun goal due to the fact that the first stage of the high pressure turbine was removed during the months of January, 1990, and February,1990. Additionally, the gross heat rate values for the months of May, June, and July, 1990, were high due to startup af ter the 1990 Refueling Outage, various derates, and season river water temperature increases. The year to date gross heat rate value is expected - to decrease as the river water temperature decreases.
The gross heat rate industry upper ten percentile value is 9,935 BTV/KWH.
Adverse Trends:
None
I IMonthly EAF
^
- 12 Month Average EAF G-Fort Calhoun Goal GOOD 20 Industry Upper 10 Percentile 100-D - -- O - -O-G M
T
--O 0-- D-O 77 80-7 p!
71 00 e.....o.
p
-..e___e... e...e....e.
- 1o.L. o r
d C
e y 40-20-0
'87
'88 '89 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul 1989 1990-E0VIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR The Equivalent Availability Factor (EAF) was reported as 97.0% for the month of July.
The 1990 EAF goal is 65.4% while the present 12 month average EAF for Fort Calhoun is 62.9%.
The EAF industry upper ten percentile value is 82.5%.
Adverse Trends:
None L.
3 l
i' 5-
+ Fuel Reliability Indicator l
G-Fort Calhoun Goal
-e Industry Upper 10 Percentile
.4-
{
n l
a n
8 3-u GOOD i
2.4
(
4, j
. i Im e
2-1.5 r
a 1- 0----O --- G---G----&--- O --- G- -- G----G --- O --- --- O l
n n - -n--- n -n - -n --m -- n - n --..n n
n-n
'88
'89 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul 1989 1990 FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR The Fuel' Reliability Indicator (FRI) is' calculated using an industry normalized purification rate 'instead of the plant's actual purification rate. The FRI was reported as 1.62 nanocuries/ gram for the month of July. This high FRI value was due to high levels of Iodine 131 and Iodine 134 which were detected during July.
The 1990 fuel reliability goal has been set at 1.0 nanocuries/ gram.
The fuel-reliability indicator industry upper ten L
percentile value is 0.04 nanocuries/ gram.
Adverse Trqnd:
None i
l i.
'I
- Personnel Radiati8n Exposure 388 400 O-Fort Calhoun Goal
-G-Industry Upper 10 Percentile GOOD 300-O 272
+
p.--O_. 9...o --&-
- O....e R
E 200-M O -- O D-/ O--G-O 0-O-O -O 70 l
6 93.4 100-j a'
,0 OG
~
'87
'88 '89 Ja Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep 0ct Nov Dec l
1990 l
PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE (CUMULATIVE)
During July, 1990, 2.4 man-rem was recorded by TLD's worn by personnel while working at the Fort Calhoun Station.
The monthly cumulative exposure goal for July was 257.5 man-rem while the actual cumulative exposure through-July totaled 238.7 man-rem. The i
exposure cumulated in 1990 has been high due to i
the increased activity in the Radiation l
Controlled Area (RCA) associated with the 1990 l
Refueling Outage, l
l The personnel radiation exposure industry upper l
ten percentile is 166 man-rem per unit per year.
i Adverse Trend: None SEP 54
! l
Monthly Radio:ctive Waste Shipped 12500-
- Cumulative Radioactive Waste Shipped G-Fort Calhoun Goal-
-G-Industry Upper 10 Percentile 10000-C u
y GOOD c 7500-4 6195 F I1722Ie e
t 5000-O --- o --- -o --- G----E> --- G----o---o---- o --- e---- 0 --- O 4454 D --- O-O -- O --G---O-O - D-O-O-O -O 2500-i i
0-l
'87 '88 '89 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec.
1990 VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLIO RADIOACTIVE WASTE The above shows the amount of. low-level radioactive waste shipped - off graphsite for disposal. The table below lists the amount of waste actually shipped off-site for disposal plus the change in
-inventory of waste in on-site storage in final form ready for burial.
Thevolumeofsolidradioactivewasteis(cubicfeet):
Amount Shipped in Aily 0.0 Amount in Temporary Storage 983.0 1990 Cumulative Amount Shipped 1568.6 1990 Goal 5000.0 i
The industry upper ten percentile value is 3,072 cubic feet per unit L
per year. The Fort Calhoun Station was in the upper ten percentile of nuclear plants for this indicator in 1986, 1987 and 1988.
Adverse Trend:
None SEP 54
s'3'-t 2-1990' Disabling Injury Frequency Rate;
-M-1989 Dis 6bling Injury Frequency Rate j
1;75-
' 6 5 Year:Ayerage Disabling Injury Frequency Rate.
~
-G-' Fort Calhoun Goal 1.5-
-EF Industry Upper 10 Percentile l
l 1.25-1 R
GOOD a-3
~ t-4 e
4
.75-
'5~
"N, m
o s
O ---- e -- G-----
G-----
- G - - -- - G -- ---O -----e-- -- - s -- -- O
.25-
-0
=
c.,
Jan.
Feb Mar Apr
.May Jun
'Jul Aug Sep Oct.
Nov Dec July 1990 i
)
DISABLING INJURY FRE00ENCY RATE (LOST-TIME ACCIDENT RATE) t i
This indicator shows +he current monthly disabling injury rate in column form. The 1989 s. abling injury frequency rate and the Fort Calhoun Station 5 year i s age disabling injury frequency rate are also shown. There were zero disabling injuries reported at the Fort Calhoun Station in= July. The total number of disabling injuries in.
1990 is zero.
The 1990 disabling injury frequency rate goal was set at 0.31% and was based on one disabling injury occurring in 1990.
t The-industry up)er ten percentile disabling injury frequency rate is 0%. The Fe-t Calhoun Station is currently performing in the upper ten percentile of nuclear power plants for this indicator.
The. year end disabling injury frequency rates for 1087, 1988, and 1989 were 0.6, 1.6, and 0.4 respectively.
Adverse Trend:
None SEP 26 i
, o
,0..
vi
l
--*- Thirmal Output
- Technical Specification Limit
.-9 4 Fort Calhoun Goall 1500 M
e:14950-O-O-e-O-O
?.
9
/
/
ll
/
a W
-a t
f1490-
-1485 1
7 14 21 28 July 1990 DAILY THERMAL OUTPUT The above thermal output graph displays the daily operating power level, the.1500 thermal meDawatt average technical specification limit, :and the 1495 thermal megawatt Fort Calhoun goal. The cross hatched area represents the. difference between the maximt-allowable operation and the - actual plant operation.
The aercent power operation of the Fort Calhoun Stat on for the month of July was reported as approximately 1000 Adverse leend:
None 4.
a-n3
c.
+
1-
=%- Equipment Forced Outage Rate
.8-
.6-GOOD-3
+
a t-
.4-t b
.2-
.13 E
q 0
0 0 han F b Mar Apr May Jun Ju'l Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
'87
'88
'89 1990' i
i E0VIPMENT FORCED OUTAGE.S.
PER 1000 CRITICAL-HOURS There ' were no equipment forced 1
outage hours reported during the month of July, 1990.
The last equipment forced outage occurred in September of 1989 and was due to a cable problem with the res istive temperature detector on reactor coolant pump motor RC-3A.
Adverse Trend:
None 4 !
o
.o
- Actual Operations Expenditures
~
-X-Operations Budget.
j100-i i d. 75-1 o.
.i1 o1 50-na
/
s r-s 25-
-0 Jan Feb-Mar' Apr May Jun-Jul Aug Sep.:Oct Nov Dec 1990 40-
- Actual Maintenance Expenditures Maintenance Budget M
i id 20-oI na s r 10-s-
0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun.
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990-OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BilDGET The-Operations and Maintenance Budget Indicator shows the-budget year to
-date as well as the actual expenditures for operations and maintenance for the Fort Calhoun Station.
The budget year to date for Operations was 50.1 million dollars for July while the actual cumulative expenditures through July totaled 44.7 million dollars.
The budget year to date for Maintenance was 17.6 million dollars for July while the actual cumulative expenditures through July totaled 14.1 million dollars.
Although Operations and Maintenar:e are currently 8.9 million dollars under budget, a cost variances study from January -through June, 1990, predicts that Operations and Maintenance will be approximately 5.7 million dollars under budget at year end 1990.
Adverse Trends:
None a
-j
a
$gmQ ? l1500-
... Documents Scheduled for Review 1
m-
-X-Documents Reviewed
,e l Overdue Documents.
.1 1200-4 J
J.
N D'
_{*900-l\\l
-b u.
l \\
em l ';
l re l
\\
n 600-l
\\-
. o-t j
\\
- f. s
/
\\
l
\\.
A
\\
L 300-k
/
\\
,A;
,/
'g g
X. 'N
. --...J X
b s
E 0
L Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul l-1989 1990 1
1 1
DOCUMENT REVIEW
. This indicator shows the number of biennial reviews completed during' the reporting month, the number of' biennial reviews scheduled for the. reporting month, and the number of biennial reviews that :are overdue. These document reviews are performed in house and include Special-Procedures, the Site ~ Security Plan, I
Maintenance Procedures, Prrventive Maintenance, and the
-Operating Manual.
During July there ware 27 document reviews completed while 138 document-reviews were scheduled. At the end of July, there were 103 document reviews overdue. The overdue document reviews at l'
the end -of ' July consisted primarily of maintenance documents.
1 During the month of July there were 15 new or renamed documents reviewed.
These new or renamed documents will need to be o
reviewed again in 1992.
^'
-The high number of documents scheduled for review for the month of. June,1990, was due to the high number of document reviews that were completed during the month of June, 1988. The reviews that were completed during June, 1988, are now due - to be reviewed.
l Adverse Trend: Nono 1
' u
_7
. N c, f.
-100 Diesel Generator No. 1
-X-Diesel Generator No. 2 98-e-Fort Calhoun Goal 96-g....-9.....s.....m.....q.....s.....s.....q....s....
.... q..:... a 94-X--X---X--X- -XW X-X I
X-X--- X- -- X- - - --X '..
h P.
e 90-r 3
c
(
'ei 88-
- ^
o n
a t
86-GOOD 1
84-82-1 80 Aug Sep_
Oct.
Nov Dec.
Jan Feb. Mar.Apr May Jun Jul 1989 1990 DG RELIABILITY LAST 100 DEMANDS t
The June, 1990, Performance Indicators Report stated that diesel
' generator D-1.had one load failure:dcring the month of June due to an. inoperable static exciter. Diesel generator D-1 actually-had two load -failures during the month of June, 1990, due to er.gine L
coolant temaerature problems..This change results in an actual 9
percent rel ability for diesel generator D-1 of 93% for the last-100 valid demands.-
Diesel generator.D-1.did not have a start and load failure during i
July, 1990. Diesel generator. D-1 has a 93 percent reliability factor over the last 100 valid demands.
L Diesel generator-D-2 did not have a start and load failure during July, -1990. D_iesel generator D 2 has a 94 percent reliability factor over the last 100 valid demands.
The Fort Calhoun goal for the diesel generator reliability is 95%.
1 Adverse Trend:
None l l ',
t
n
~
1-r" 9
! Diesel Generator No.=1 i
-X Diesel Generator No. 2 LG-Fort Calhoun Goal--
-100-l l
l l
l l
l l
-t 9b
&- --- G ----- 9 ---- - --- G- --- - --G ---- E- ---- B -- - - e - - - G ----- O p-
/
l i
e r
,/
l
," 90-I n-t n
i 85-
~
GOOD.
80 Aug Sep.Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar' Apr May Jun' 'Jul 1989 1990
.i DG RELIABILITY LAST 20 DEMANDS-g The June, 1990, Perforr.ance Indicators Report stated -that diesel generator.
l D-1 had one load failure du'?ing the month of June.due to anvinoperable static p
exciter.. Diesel generator D-1 actually had two load failures _during the month of June, 1990, due to engine coolant temperature-problems. This change results in an actual percent reliability for diesel generator D-1 of 90% for the last 20 valid demands.
Diesel-generator D-1 did not have a start and load. failure during. July, 1990.
Diesel ~ generator D-1 has a 90 percent reliability factor over the last 20 L
valid demands.
l
. Diesel generator D-2 did not have a start and load failure during July, 1990.
Diesel generator D-2 has a 95 percent reliability factor over the last120 valid demands.
The Fort Calhoun goal for the diesel generator reliability for the last 20 demands is set at 95%.. Diesel D-2 presently meets this goal, p
Adverse Trend:
None,
y
- - - - - - ^ ' - - - - ' - - - - - - - " ' - - - - - " - - - - - ~ - " ' - " ' ' ' ' - ^ -
m.
- 3. L 400-L-
E May 1990 E June 1990 R July 1990
- u
_ f
'300-t a
n d :-
i 200-I
- g W
- . 0:
100-5-
a-~~
o
=
[
s t
~ g y
{ ]
P 0
-~
~~
0-3 3-6 6-9 9-12
>12 Age in Months AGE OF OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE WORK ORDERS (CORRECTIVE NON-0UTAGE)
This indicator shows the age ' of corrective
-non-outage maintenance work orders (MWO's) remaining.open-at the end of the' reporting month.
Adverse Trend: None 1
$ i
1 500-May 1990-
' June 1990 400 I
IJuly 1990 300-
=2 200-
==
~
=5E re 100-
_b M
ses
~l B~i M
g
=
l.
g.
M
~
mm W
1 l-Total Open Total Open Open Open-MW0s Open Safety High MW0s
> 3 Months Safety Related Priority L
Old Related MW0s MW0s l
MW0s
> 3 Months
[
Old MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN.
-(CORRECTIVE NON-0UTAGE) 1:
l.
This indicator shows the total number of corrective non-outage MW0's remaining open at the end of the reporting month, along with - a breakdown by several key categories.
Adverse Trend: None 1.
r: '
O.
't n' ' <
- Corrective Maintenance Backlsg > 3 Months Old
-O-Industry Upper QuartileL o
80-GOOD' I'-
60-
- P :.
I o-
_o:
o
_o 4_
o O- - - O -O --O c 40 e
n-t-
20-O Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr.
May.
Jun Jul i
1989 1990 CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOGt GREATER-THAN 3 MONTHS OLD
'(N0N-00TAGE)-
This indicator shows the percentage of open corrective non-outage maintenance work = orders i
that are greater than three months' old at the end of the reporting month.
The percentage of open corrective non-outage.
maintenance work orders that are.-greater than three months old at:-the end of July was reported as 36.3%
The industry upper quartile value for corrective-maintenance backlog greater than 3 months old is t.
45.8%.. The Fort Calhoun Station is -currently
~'
operating in the upper quartile of _ nuclear power j
plants for this indicator.
Adverse Trend:
None 1
- r J
- Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance 1
+ Industry Upper Quartile 90-4G-Fort'Calhoun Goal 80-70-t P.-*
60-
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
O----- Q-----
___- K. _-- y-Q _..- _5-- _- $.._-- _V - -- K.-.- _-.-. _ S. - --@-
9 y
q j
e n
50-t-
/\\
40-GOOD 30-20 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May. Jun Jul 1989 1990 i
c r
RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE (NON-0UTAGE)
The ratio of preventive: to total maintenance indicator-.
shows the ratio - of completed non-outage preventive maintenance to total completed non-outage maintenance.
l The ratio of preventive to total. maintenance at the Fort i
Calhoun Station decreased.to 66.7% in July.
The Fort Calhoun-goal is to have a ratio of. preventive-to total maintenance greater than 60%. -
.The industry upper quartile value for the ratio of preventive to total maintenance is 57.7%. The -Fort Calhoun
' Station is currently performing in the upper. quar. tile of nuclear power plants in this area.
Adverse Trend:
None 4
SEP 41 -
/
q
- Preventive Maintenance Items Overdue q
' 5-4 - Industry Upper Quartile G-Fort Calhoun Goal ~
I.
'4-1 GOOD j
p.
- S 3-e
- r c.
e n
g.
o
, qm _o,..+...o
__ o o '
l
- e....e.___
. _ _ _ _ e _ _ _ _ _ e _ _ _.e _ _ _ _.e_ _ 2C O
O
--O
- 1-L0
'Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar-Apr May
.Jun Jul
l 1989 1990
-1 J
PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE The' purpose of this indicator is to monitor progress in the administration-and execution of preventive maintenance; programs. A small percentage-of-preventive maintenance ' items overdue indicates a station commitment to the
~;
preventive maintenance program and an ability toLplan, schedule,.and perform preventive maintenance tasks as programs require.
This' indicator reflected 2.1% for PM's that were overdue for the months of -
t February through May, 1990. During July,. the outstanding refueling optage -
)reventive maintenance: items were closed. The -backlog. of - overdue' items has-
)een' reduced from 86. to 17_.. This change in the number of overdue' PM items reduced the percent of overdue PM's to 0.42% for the months -of February through May, 1990.
During July, 1990, 678 PM items were completed. A total of 2 PM items were not completed within the allowable grace period.
The Fort Calhoun goal is to have less than 1.2% preventive maintenance items.
overdue. The industry upper quartile for preventive maintenance items overdue is 1.2%. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently performing in the industry upper quartile for this indicator.
Adverse Trend: None SEP 41.-
L' 40 Total Control Room Instruments Out-of-Service:
9-Industry Upper Quartile For. Total' Out-of-Service ' Instrument's
- O-Fort Calhoun Goal-For Total Out-of-Service-Instruments 30-7 I
GOOD
- N n.-
u s-i at g
br e u 20-l (
rm.
e on-
-ft i
s-i L
10-Q ' _9 g
Aug Sep
' Oct.
Nov Dec Jan.
Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul 1989 1990 NUMBER OF OUT-OF-SERVICE CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS This indicator shows the number of out-of-service control: room instruments, the industry upper quartile for this indicator, and the Fort Calhoun goal.
.There was a total of 30 out-of-service control room instruments at the end of
' July. The increase in the number of out-of-service control room instruments is due to an Engineering evaluation of the INP0 definition of out-of-service control room instruments. The Fort Calhoun Station -is now reporting out-of-service control room instruments as requested by the INPO -definition.
Another reason for the high number of out-of-service instruments Lis due to -
the high number of control room instrument deficiencies being added each month.
The Fort Calhoun goal is to have less than '7 out-of-service control room instruments. The industry upper quartile value for the number of out-of-service control room instruments is 7.
Adverse Trend:
The number of out-of-service control room instruments has been increasing since May,1990. This increase is due to changes being made to this indicator and to the large amount of deficiencies being added to the out-of-service control room instruments list each month. !
h
'i.
80i
- Maintenance Overtime L
-* 12 Month Average:
G-Fort Calhoun Goal <
b 60-
.,0.... 9,
, p..
N e-9' O,
r 40-s
- C
/
.\\
e
/-
g n
jl
's t
/
-N 0 ----
- - -- G - -- - - O - - -- -& --- --$
O ----- O
~
v s,
20-
'N 0
Aug Sep.:Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar' Apr May Jun
'Jul 1989 1990 MAINTENANCE OVERTIME The Maintenance Overtime Indicator monitors the ability to perform the. desired maintenance activities with the allotted resources.
Excessive overtime indicates insufficient resource allocation and can lead to errors due-to. fatigue.
The percent of overtime hours with respect to normal hours was reported as 2.6% during the month-of July,1990. The 12 month average percentage _of overtime hours with respect to -
normal hours was reported as 19.2%.
The high percentage. of overtime hours reported for the months of February, 1990, through May, 1990, was due. to increased maintenance support. associated with the 1990 Refueling Outage..
The Fort Calhoun goal for the percent of. maintenance overtime hours worked has been set at 25% for non-outage months and 50% for outage months.
Adverse Trend:
None.
N
20-j L,_J Open IR's;Related to' the' Use of. Pr:cedures-(Maintenance) r E Closed IR's Relatad to the Use-of Procedures (Maintenance)
L ProceduralNoncomi.lianceIR's(Maintenance)
N'~15-
. u.
b.
r r
1010' o' lo-
- i
- f 4
8:
~
1 7
R; e
5-b s
33 33 33 3
3 2
2 22 1
i 1
Is El 1
1.11 l'
l o ooo
-l go o-comoo o
Aug
- Sep Oct_ Nov Dec Jan Feb-Mar.
Apr May:
Jun Jul; 1989
'1990 PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS
.(MAINTENANCE)
This indicator shows the number of identified Maintenance Incidents -Reports '(IR's) that are related to ' the use 'of procedures,. the number-of closed IR's that are related to the use of i
procedures.(includes IR's that were caused by procedural. noncompliance), and the number of-closed-IR's that were caused by procedural noncompliance.
It should be noted that the second and third columns will lag behind the first column until the IR's 'are closed. This reporting method is due to the. process-in.which IR's receive. category codes, y'
IR's receive their category codes when they are closed.
Adverse Trend:
None SEP 15 & 44 4
P m.
m
1,3 J.
- 4 '~
900-
- Open MWO's e-Fort Calhoun Goal 800-t.
700-o Nf
. u m M 600- Ct
& ----O ---- & ---- O---- & ---- O---- 9 ---- O ---- & ----O^
by e 0-r' 5:
500-V 400-
-300
.Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar.
Apr.
May Jun
.Jul' 1989 1990 MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BACKLOG (CORRECTIVENON-0UTAGEMAINTENANCE)
This indicator shows--the number of corrective non-outage. maintenance work orders-that are open at-the end of the reporting month.'
At the end of July, 1990,.there were - 430 corrective non-outage maintenance work orders remaining open.
The goal for this indicator is to have less: than 600 corrective non-outage maintenance-work orders remaining open.
Adverse Trend:
None SEP 36 r
s,
.J j
a 4 '
.g 5-Number of Missed ST,'s-R2sulting in LER's J
s 4
N-3-
. u-
.m b-r 2-
.E e
1-1 0
Aug Sep.
Oct Nov Det.
Jan Feb-Mar.
Apr May J"n Jul 1989-100^
.l n
L NUMBER OF MISSED SURVEILLANCE TESTS l
RESULTING IN LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS l
This : indicator shows the number of missed Surveillance Tests (ST's) > that. re:; ult in l
Licensee - Event Reports '(LER's)- during the l::
reporting month.
During - the - month of July,1990, there were no missed ST's that resulted in LER's, j
Adverse Trend: None SEP 60 & 61 i.
y 1
i
.35-I
- l. Total NPRDS Component Failures
- 30-4 Confirmed NPRDS Component Failures 25-N uF 3
- 20-
~
b l' r -
o e.
k' fs
- 2 10-i
~W N
t h
Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan~
Feb Mar Apr.
May Jun
.Jul-1989 1990 r
NUMBER OF NUCLEAR PLANT RELIABILITY DATA SYSTEMS (NPRDS)
REPORTABLE FAILURES This indicator shows the total number of NPRDS component failures and the number of confirmed-NPRDS component failures. 'The: total number of NPRDS~ component failures is based _upon the number of failure reports sent to INP0. The ' number of confirmed NPRDS com)onent failures is based upon the number 'of fa lure reports that have been accepted. by INP0. The difference.of these two figures is,the number of failure reports-still J
l.
under review by INP0.
L During July, 1990, there was a total of zero l
confirmed NPRDS component failures.
1..
Adverse Trend: None 41-l
c I
.15-
-l--*- Componints With More Than' One Failure
--X-Components With More Than Two Failures r
_ u.-
m b.
GOOD e
.r
[
10-9 f
- m-P os S-X X X- - -- --X--
- - -X------X N
nl s,
/
y t
'x '~~. i
~~g, '.
' x;' ~,-
- n y.... y, 1
t' 0
Oct
.Nov Dec Jan_
F-b Mar Apr
-May.
Jun. 'Jul-Aug Sep 1989 1990 l
1 MAINTENANCE EFFECTIVENESS The Maintenance-Effectiveness Indicator was developed following guidelines set forth b thel Nuclear' Regulatory.
i Commission's Office for Anal sis and Evaluation o f.
Operational Data -(NRC/AE00). The NRC/AE00 is currently developing-and-verifying a maintenance effectiveness indicatw using the' Nuc, lear Plant Reliability Data System E(NPRDS)componentfailures.
N This indicator -shows the number of NPRDS components with more than one failure during the last twelve months and the number of NPRDS components with more than two failures y
during the last twelve months. The number of NPRDS components with more than two failures in ' a' twelve-month period should indicate.the effectiveness of plant E.y maintenance.
During July, 1990, there were.7 NPRDS compt
.s with more n
1 than one failure and 2 NPRDS components wit
.aore than two failures. The tag numbers of the 2 -NPRDS t.omponents with l
more than two failures in the last twelve months include:
Adverse Trend:
None j L l
\\
l
f 4
'. 20 -
- Check Valve Failure Rate j
-A. Industry Check: Valve Failure Rate i
i 15-
.o
- 1 GOOD
,1 'y [
V U ie,
- r 1 n 10-j 1t-l e H' p no U
- r.-
r 5-s j
g.
_ g
-f-
'6
~6
')
Dec_ Jan; Feb Mar-Apr May Jun Jul Aug.
Sep Oct Nov 1989 1990
. CHECK VALVE FAILURE RATE g
.Thb -Check Valve Failure Rate Indicator has been changed to reflect t
the current Fort.Calhoun -Stetion check valve failure ' rate.. This inoicator shows the Fort Calhoun' check valve failure rate and the industry check valve failure-rate..
The data for. the industry check. valve failure rate. is three months behind the Performance Indicators Report-1 reporting month due to the time involved - in. collecting' and processing the data. The industry f ailure. rate is based upon -failures that have occurred -in the previous 18~ month interval.
Fore April, 1990, the Fort Calhoun Station reported a check valve failure rate of 10.4E-6 while the. industry reported a failure rate of-2.5E;6.-At the end of July, the Fort Calhoun Station reported a check valve failure rate of 8.99E-6. At this present time, the check valve
. failure rate for Fort Calhoun is high. The reason for the high check
~ -o valve failure rate is that the plant is performing mai-tenance on check valves which have not been checked for failures before. As time goes. on, the check valve failure rate is expected to decrease due to the fact -that the check valves are now being maintained through the Check Valve. Program.
Adverse Trend: None SEP 43 L
- Sectndary Systea CPI
+- Secondary System CPI Limit
-1.5-
+ Industry Upper Quartile 4
1-i----+----4----+---+---+---
l--+---+----+-----t-----+
l<
j GOOD
+
I
.5-
.38
~
o __..q.._.o._._o _. q _ 9 _ o __ 3 _ _ 9 _ q o _ __ o 0
0
'88
'89 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun 1989 1990 1000-
- Hours Chemistry is Outside OG Guidelines 757.7 800-II-0 H-o 600-
[.'
u GOOD 359 r 400
+
.l l
s 200-x
'87-
'88 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun 1989-1990 jfCONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY The top graph, Secondary System Chemistry Performance Index (CPI), is
' calculated using three parameters. The three parameters used include; cation conductivity in steam generator blowdown, sodium in steam generator blowdown,_
l L",
and condensate pump discharge dissolved oxygen. The CPI was reported as 0.47 for the month of June. The industry upper quartile value for this _ indicator is 0.20.
The bottom graph, Hours Chemistry is Outside Owners Guidelines, tracks the p
total hours of.13 parameters exceeding guidelines during power operation. The number of hours outside owners group guidelines was reported as 67.8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br />.
for the month of June.
l The high CPI value and the high amount of hours outside owners group guidelines for the month of June was due to startup after the 1990 Refueling i
l Outage and various power fluctuations which occurred during June.
The above two chemistry indicators are one month behind the reporting period due to the time needed for data collection and evaluation of the station chemistry data.
Adverse Trends:
None l o
w
.e n
[;;
10-Primary System Chemistry Out of Limit
++-
8 ti; P
5 GOOD --
+
n.
t 4-y.
i 1.9 2-O m
m
'88' t'89 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr -May= Jun?
1989 1990 PRIMARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERCENT-Of HOURS 0UT OF LIMIT The Primary. System Chemistry -h Percent of Hours Out of Limit -indicator tracks ~ the primary. system chemistry performance by monitoring six key chemistry parameters.
The Primary System Chemistry - Percent of Hours Out oftLimit was reported as 3.3% for the month of June. The high percent of hours, out of limit for the-primary system was due to startup after the 1990 Refueling
' Outage,and various. power fluctuations which y
occurred during - June. 100% equates to all six. parameters being out of limit for the 1
month.
Adverse-Trend: None l n
n
T J E
g 4
j i-O Auxiliary Syste] Ch distry Out 0f-Linit
<j J'
+ Industry Upper Quartile GOOD i
+
o 30-H-
o u
~20-r-
s.
10-t w.
..w.
n..
e
'88
'89
~Jul A'ug Sep 0'c't Nov.D'e'c Jan Fe'b M r A r : M y J n :
1989 1990 AUXILIARY SYSTEM (CCW) CHEMISTRY HQU,R1 OUTSIDE STATION LIMITS
)v The Auxiliary System Chemistry. Hours Outside Station Limits indicator tracks the monthly hours that the Component Cooling Water. (CCW)
~ system is - outside the station chemistry 3
limit. The. above chemistry indicator is one month behind the reporting: period ldue to the time needed for data collection and evaluation of the chemistry data for the-L station.
j The auxiliary system chemistry hours outside station limits was reported 'as zero for the month of June.
The i ndustry upper quartile value for q
auxiliary systems chemistry hours outside
- m s t at' ion. limits is 2.6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently performing in the ' upper quartile of all nuclear power 1
plants.for this indicator.
Adverse Trend: None l
'6,
t e.
a c
Number of Out-of-Service Instruments
'20 G-Fort Calhoun Goal
_.=
b3b h
]
16-I
=
_. =.
m sseu
=_=
2_ ;;;;
. _ = =
Nn
- irmi EE i==- M
!!! E=
~T
- - =
me u3 ram e==;
em t_= =
ggg
=
m t 12-em: m
--=
=
mi was
a zr
amuz
__=
rm
s
r_T
==
==w y r-a e u
- g
==
53 ame
= - -
r m mm si E_-
-~=
am E==
=
q r
e 8 ;;; a=E
=-
- ==;
y" 7;;
gj;7g
_; gg E
z
=ma 123 M 5:a :==;
-~~
- _7 gggy_g;g
. g
_gg Lg gggg
.,gy o
t 7_
4-N
$bI
=
5b 55*5 L
N:b GllEl M
- $d$ M_-
~-
=
b__. b==
Z 5
_-.~. =
2Z2
~
Z
_-]
~
f=55 ir= ]FM
=ZZ
=g
=
- ==
Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul 1989 1990 IN-LINE CHEMISTRY INSTRUMENTS OUT-OF-SERVICE This indicator shows the total number of in-line chemistry system instruments that are out-of-service at the end of the reporting month.
The. chemistry systems involved in this indicator include the Secondary System and the Post Accident Sampling System (PASS).
At the end of July there were a total of 6 in-line chemistry instruments that were out-of-service.
Four of these -instruments were from the Secondary System and two were from PASS.
The Fort Calhoun goal for the number of in-line chemistry system instruments that are out-of-service has been changed from 3 to 6 out-of-service chemistry instruments.
Six out-of-service chemistry instruments mne up 10%
of all the chemistry instruments which are counted for this indicator.
Adverse Trend:
None -
3.
i 10000; I
11otal Waste Produced
- Federal and State Limit.
1 8000-
..K, io 1 f 6000-
' 0 w:
_ fa 8
l
- a t
m 4000 s'
2000-
]
s lO' I
I Aug Sep-Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul a
1989 1990 j
HAZARDOUS WASTE-PRODUCED This indicator shows the total. amount of hazardous waste produced by Fort Calhoun each month. This s'
hazardous waste consists of non-halogenated
-hazardous ' waste, halogenated hazardous waste,- and other hazardous waste produced. The amount of waste 4
oil produced by-the Fort Calhoun Station is no i
longer shown.
During the month of July, 0.0 kilograms. of non-halogenated hazardous waste was produced, 222.2 kilograms of halogenated hazardous waste was produced, and 0.0 kilograms of other: hazardous t
waste was produced.
'The.large amount of hazardous waste produced during the months of. September and October, 1990, was caused by a mercury spill at the sulfuric acid tank located on the east side of the service building.
]
Adverse Trend:
None
~.
~.. - -
e u.;
ll:
'5000-1-
1 JMonth~
i Quarter OPPD l
Limit' L
Year.
4000-
!j y
g L
'3000-1:
'a R.
-l L
E; i
'M July 1990 i
- 1 l-i j
MAXIMUM' INDIVIDUAL RADIATION' EXPOSURE
-l During July,1990 an individual accumulated 193 mhem 'which-was the highest individual exposure _for the month.
'The-maximum individual exposure to -date.forithe third
. quarter of 1990 has been 193 mrem..
i The maximum ' individual exposure reported to date for 1990-has been 2,090 mrem.
The high maximum individual' exposure reported so-f ar for the 1990 year to date. value was due to increased activities.in the Radiation Controlled Area (RCA) associated-with the 1990'
}
Refueling Outage.
The maximum accumulated 1989 individual exposure was 1,1b5 q-mrem, received by a Health Physicist.
4 K,
lhe OPPD limit for the maximum yearly individual radiation exposure is 4,500 mrem / year.
Adverse Trend:
None p
c c
y e
s El Monthly Contaminaticns 500
- Cumulative contaminations
-G-Fort Calhoun Goal-
<> Industry Upper Quartile 400-357 P.
e l
r s
300-GOOD i
. '4 o
'l n
+
j n
e 200-157 I
o.... e... o.. e...e....e....e... e... s...u... e....e Ig q
o-o-o._.o._.o. _o...o.....o.. o_.,.o
.o o
l 100-l hh 0
'88 '89
' Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 4
I i
.?
TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMINATIONS There was a total of one-skin and clothing contamination l
reported ~for-the Fort Calhoun Station during July,-1990. There has been a total of 206 skin and= clothing-contaminations so far in 1990. The high number: of skin and clothing contaminations which occurred during the months of-March and April', 1990, were related to increased activity-in the Radiation < Controlled Area
'l
.(RCA) during the 1990 Refueling Outage.
j
.There was a total of.157 skin and clothing contaminations in
- 1989, 1
The 1990~ goal for skin and clothing is 150 contaminations. This i
1990. goal _of 150 contaminations includes a Fort Calhoun goal _of 23 skin contaminations.
The industry upper quartile value for total skin and clothing contaminations is 129 per unit annually.
Adverse Trend: None SEP 15 & 54 i
i
, J
_7
)
_,.D 8
i g
+
- g..'n >
- Decontaminated Auxiliary Building 1
- 100-a' 80-f P
e:
} ' 60-e n-t-
1
- 40
/\\
q GOOD 20-i 0
Aug-Sep Oct.
Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar.
- Apr, May Jun Jul-1989' 1990.
.1
. i DECONTAMINATED AUXILIARY BUILDING This graph shows the percentage of the auxiliary building.: which -is. decontaminated (clean) based on the total square footage.-
As of July.31, 1990, 84% of the total square footage of the auxiliary - building was decontaminated.-
Adverse Trend: None SEP 54 l
d
,o.
Number of Identified PRWP's l
N.
u' 15-a b
P i
.[10-P R
7
~
y 5-N'
[
5 2
2
$[$
y 1
1 Y
C.
0 EM
$@E lie O
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGR.AM The Radiological Work Practices Program Indicator shows the number of Poor nadiological Work Practices (PRWD's) which were identified during the reporting month.
Tha' number of PRWP's which are identified each month should indirectly provide a means to qualitatively assess supervisor accountability for their workers' radiological per'armance.
During the month of July,1990, zero PRWP's were identilied.
Adverse Trend:
None SEP 52 h.
1 m
80-E Total Number of Hot Spots 60-NH SO 50 uo-mt b
r.
e S 40-rp o
ot fs 20-O Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May MLMBER OF HOT SPOTS Thh 'ndicator shows the total number of hot spots which have been ideiiufied to - exist in the Fort Calhoun Station and have been documentel through the use of a hot spot identificat'- sheet.
A hot spot is defined as a small localized source of high radiation. A hot spot occurs when the contact dose rate of an item or piece of equipment is at least 5 times the General Area dose rate and the. item or piece of equipment's ' dose rate is equal to or grea *r - than 100 dem/ hour.
Since January 1, 1990, 16 identified and dbcumerted hut sp7ts have
- been removed from the Fort Calhoun station. The removal o" these hot spots reduced the total. umber of hot spots from 60, at the beginning of January, 1990, to 50 at the end of h ly, 1990.
At the end of July, 50 hot spots were identified and docs;;;ented to exist in the Fort Calhoun Station. During the month cf July, one kot spot was removed from the Fort Calhou:. Station.
The Station ALARA committee established c goal to eliminate et least 5 hot spots during 1990. The Fort Ca%9un Station has exceeded this goal.
Adverse Trend: None l m
a
R Monthly Radioactive Gas Discharged
- Cumulative Radioactive Gas Discharged
.l G-Cumu at ve Goal j
l i
- 785 800-GOOD 4
1 C
600-
)
u i
r 1
i 432
-Ie 400-l s
1 200-k O---- O ---G ---O --- G----GF--- G --- &---O --- G- -
0-l
'87
'88 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 L
GASE005 RAD 10ACT.VE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIR0'HENT The gaseous radioactive waste being l.
discharged to the environment is shown for 1989. A total of 164.4 curies have been l
released to the environment from January throu!)h December of 1989. The Fort Calhoun Stat'on goal is 145 curies for this indicator.
The gaseous radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is calculated l
every six months.
Adverse Trend: None i
4 l :
y
..m---
.m u--.
A
I o
Monthly Radi active Liquid Discharged
- Cumulative Radioactive Liquid Discharged c
G-Cumulative Goal 228 231 400-I 180 C
300-
-G-G-G-O-O-@-@-e-e-&-0
- 1u
'I I-r i
200-GOOD 100-
'I I'
0
'86
'87
'88 Jan Feb Mar _ Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 q
2500-0 T f h
2000-0 G u,
1500-sj a1 1000-n n d
500-n 5 s I'
0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 LIOUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING 01SCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT The liquid radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is shown for 1989. The liquid radioactive waste that was discharged to the environment from all sources totaled 227.7 curies from January through December 1989.
7 The Fort Calhoun Station goal for 1989 is 320 curies.
The bottom graph shows the volume of liquid radioactive waste that has been released from the radioactive waste monitor tanks.
The volume of liquid radioactive waste discharged to the environment from the radioactive waste monitor tanks totaled 1.2 million gallons from January through December, 1989.
The liquid radioactive waste heing discharged to the environment is calculated every six months.
Adverse Trend: None -
100' Number of Leggable/ Reportable Incid:nts N
," 80-b e
r L
, 60 -
f 47 I
a
" 40-f i
l
.d e
i
" 20-s 0
0 1_,
O'
.j m
0 LDV Badges Escort Svstem Key Access Fa'ilures Control-Control July 19W LOGGABLE/ REPORTABLE INL'IDENTS (SECURITY)
The. Loggable/R(portable Incidents (Security) Indicator shows the total number of loggable/ reportable incidents concerning Licensee Designated Vehicles (LDV's), security badges, securi'.y key control, escorting, access control, and. security syster, f ailures for the reporting month.
Dur'ng the month of July,
- 1990, there were 52 loggable/ reportable incidents identified compared with 79 loggible/ reportable incidents the previous month. Security system failures accounted for 47 of the loggable/ reportable g
l
'ncitents (90%) reported during July, 1990. Environmental-c'>nditions (sunspots, fog, shadowing, and heavy rains) were tDe major causes of the CCTV and Alarm failures. Increased L'
attention by security and maintenance personnel is currently unierway to correct these environmental problems.
M.)erse Trend: None SEP 58 l
i
o
@ Lice see De$ignat:d Vehici:s (LDV's)
E Security Badges-1 I Security Key Control Escorting
$s Access Control Security System Failures Security Badges 65*
j curity Key Control 4%
i ll
///
V
- - =
Security System Failures 90%
/
SECURITY INCIDElif BREAKDOWN The Security Incident Breakdown Indicator shows the percentage of incidents concerning the following items for the reporting month. These items include:
Licensee Designated Vehicles (LDV's), security badges, security key control, escorting, access control, and security
)
system failures.
Security items Number of incidents JUL 1990_
JUN 1990 Licensee Designated Vehicles (LDV's) 0
?
Security Badges 3
0 Security Key Control 2
3 Escorting 0
1 Access Control 0
0 Security System Failures 47 73 Total 52 79 Adverse Trend:
None SEP 58. - -
i O
e 30-26
, 25-u a
b e 20-r o
I 15-14 F
l a
i 1 10-u r
e 5
5-t 2
0 Alarm System CCTV Computer Terminal Door Card Reader SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES l
The Security System Failures Indicator shows the number of incidents concerning the following items for the reporting month. These items include: alarm system failures, CCTV failures, security computer failures, terminal failures, door equipment failures, and card reader failures.
System Failures Number of incidents JUL 90 JUN 90 Alarm Systems 14 43 CCTV 26 19 Computer 2
3 Terminal 0
1 Door Equipment 5
8 Card Reader 0
Q._
l-l.
Total 47 73 5
Adverse Trend:
None SEP 58 l 1
15-
- Amount of Work On Hold Awaiting Parts 12-GOOD P
9-
+
e c
e n
t 6-3-
0 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul 1989 1990 AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAITING PARTS E
(NON-0UTAGE)
This procurement indicator displays the amount of open, non-outage, maintenance items that are on hold awaiting parts, to the total amount of open, non-outage, maintenance items, expressed as a percentage, i
The percentage of work on hold awaiting parts decreased to 4.7% in July.
As of July 31, 1990, there were a total of 1,123 open, non-outage, maintenance items with 53 of these items on hold awaiting parts.
Adverse Trend: None
-. ~ - -
-m
10-
- Spare Parts Inventory Value I
Mj 9-l
/
o n-8-
s i
~
D 7-0 a
r s
6-
~5 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul 1989 1990 1
SPARE PARTS INVENTORY VALUE The spare parts inventory value at the Fort Calhoun Station at the end of July, 1990 was reported as $8,607,700.
Adverse Trend None l-l' ln 1 L-l.
.~
a-750-
{
- Spare Parts Issued o
u - 600-s a
n-d 450-o I
300-D o
1 1
150-o r
s 0
Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr-May Jun Jul l
1980 1990
(
,$ PARE PARTS ISSUEQ The value of the spare parts issued during July, 1990, totaled $220,789.
Adverse Trend:
None i
t-l. - _.
r J
2 Inv:nt;ry Accuracy NO-
- i
+.
- ~
v c:
I 80-T. b
%J l' " : '
fpj y,4. -
P p..
y.
i 60- N'i f W l
- w,,,
g*s-l
\\
r C
e "t,
(
r l
h n
4 7
t 40 l
g;j t
y L;
y4,y;4 i
ppj,) W L
- n{$.$
v.
4 xv fi
- .~ y
&og
?'
M'l kf3) b'
([
Y h$((>kk Mk l
1 4 - c.
O J
20-h
~
21 ft i
h '#
k I
a J
d p
g Ib 0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 INVENTORY ACCURACY This indicator shows the accuracy of the actual parts count for the warehouse compared to the counts contained in the MM!S computer system for the reporting month.
During July, 425 different line items were counted in the warehouse. Of the 425 line items counted 5 items needed count adjustments. The inventory accuracy for the month of July was reported as 99%.
Adverse Trend:
None i
1 1
l 1 l
=
5-
- Pick Tickets With Parts Not Available f.
4-P pi eC rk 3
C eT
.n i tC'k 2-0 8 ft s
1-O Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 4
STOCK 0VT RATE This indicator shows the percentage of the number of Pick Tickets generated with no parts available during the reporting month.
During the month of July, a total of 1,078 Pick Tickets were generated. Of the 1,078 Pick Tickets generated, zero Pick Tickets were generated with no parts available.
Adverse Trend:
None J'
O Total.-Rsceipts 1500 6-Spare Parts Receipts
'O-Standard Stores Receipts rect Garge Receipts 1200-N R u
900-
- ec 8 e ej.
r p t 600-O s f
O 300-N
. O.,
x, 3..
,,g 1
-* --- -F.., ' d -
q
- ge 0
Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan 1990 1991 WAREHOUSE RECElpTS Ihis indicator shows the total number of warehouse receipts, the number of spare parts receipts, the number of standard stores receipts, and the number of direct charge receipts during the reporting month.
During July the warehouse received a total of 751 receipts. Of-the 751-receipts received,173 were
- spare parts receipts, 122 were standard stores receipts, 6nd 257 were direct charge receipts.
Adverse Trend: None 1 f
4 4000-e-Tctal Issu;s 6-Spare Parts Issues
-O Standard Stores Issues
-N-Direct Charge Issues 3000-
]
N i
"I
~
m 4
5 b 5 e
2000-r" e
o O.
J s
'N 1
i' i
- O-
-o; j
~1000-O
.a..
O
..g i
0 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan 1990 1991 k
4 5
WAREHOUSE ISSUES This -indicator shows the total number of warehouse issues, the number of spare parts' issues, the number of standard stores issues, and the number direct i
charge. issues for.the reporting month.
During July the warehouse completed a total of 1,043 issues. Of the 1,043 issues completed, 149 were spare parts issues, 618 were standard stores issues, and 276 were direct charge issues.
Adverse Trend: None w
er
+
4 50 Total Returns 6-Spare Parts Returns
-O Standard Stores Returns
-X-Direct Charge Returns T
I Po et i
ra 30-c1 e.
A n!
/\\
ts
/
's',
s /
ou i
's fe
/
h 5
/
l 10-h * * * ~ 0'
)
.o 6,,,..,' o.;_ - o ~'
O-
)
0 X
n X
X X
M
'Feb Mar _
Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec.
Jan 1990 1991 i
WAREHOUSE RETURNS The Warehouse Returns Indicator shows the 3ercentage of the total number of warehouse returns, tie number of spare parts returns, the number of standard stores returns, and the number of direct charge returns compared to the total number of warehouse issues during the reporting m nth.
l During the month of July there were a total of 1,043 warehouse issues. Of the 1,043 issues, there were 252 t-total returns..These returns consisted of 170 spare parts returns, 82 standard stores returns, and zero D.
direct charge returns.
Adverse Trend:
None 1 !
h
3 h.
25-L_jMay1990-3 June 1990 W July 1990 M 20-a t
e Nr u i 15-in.
b1 e
rR e 10-
- oq fu e
s t 5-h mi D.
5
=,
<-c M
h 4
'I
~
0 0-5' 6-10 11-15 16-20 21-30
>30 i
Age in Days L
MATERIAL RE0 VESTS AWAITING APPROVAL This indicator shows the number of materia?
requests awaiting approval at the end of the reporting month broken down into their. age by days.
At the end of July, 37 r.aterial requests were awaiting approval.
Adverse Trend:
None i I
2-Percentage of Total. Purchases that are Expedited 1.5-P r
c l-e n
t
.5-u l
4 0-Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 EXPEDITED PURCHASES i
This indicator shows the percentage of expedited purchases compared to the total number of purchase orders generated during the reporting month.
l During July, there was a total of 255 purchase orders generated. Of the 255 purchase orders generated, there were no
,.~
expedited purchases.
Adverse Trend: None l
< i
~.. -
i l
0-1 IMay 1990 June.1990 l
July 1990 l
120-N "n 90-b*V e
rf e 60-n
- fs 30-
{
f i
t 0--
Shelf Life CQE Miscellaneous i
INVOICE BREAKDOWN This indicator shows= Lthe number of invoices that are on hold at the end of the reporting month due to shelf life,
> i CQE, and miscellaneous reasons.
At the end of July,18 invoices were on hold due to e,nelf life reasons, 87 invoices were on hold due to CQE reasons, and 29 invoices were on hold due to miscellaneous reasons.
Adverse Trend:
Ncne e.
rnw
--,,w-
,r,,-.
-..-,-v.,
- - ~,, ~ ~ - -.., -.,-
-, -,. +
m
5 I#
9e P;rc:ntage cf Material R:q:ssts fcr Issues with the Request Date the same as the Need Date 80-i 2:
m P
, 60-r C
e n 40-t 20-O Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 MATERIAL RE0 VEST PLANNING This indicator shows the percent of material requests (MR's) for issues with their request date the - same as their need date compared to the total number of MR's for issues for the reporting month.
During the month of May, a total of 1,078 MR's were recaived by the warehouse. Of the 1,078 total MR's received by the warehouse, 756 MR's were for issues with their request date the same as their need date.
L Adversv Trend: None 1
i i e
w-
.m
700-
- Total Modification Packages Open 600-500-425 425
-ill400-300-200
'87
'88 '89 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul 1989 1990 OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS The total number of outstanding modifications increased by one during the conth of July.
CATEGORY-JUN 90 JUL 90 Form FC-1133 Backlog /In Progress 17 13 Mod Requests Being Revlewed 106 109 Design Engr. Backlog /I! Progress 119 117 Construction Backlog /In Progress 50 42 Desian Enar. Update Backloa/In Proaress 48
_6Q Total 340 341 As of the end of July 44 additional modification requests have been issued this year and.12 modification requests have been cancelled. The Nuclear Projects Review Committee (NPRC) has completed ' 89 backlog I
modification request reviews this year. The Nuclear Projects Committee (NPC) has completed 62 backlog modification request reviews this year.
The number of reviews completed is high due to the fact that some of
[
these requests were reviewed more than once.
1 Adverse Trend:
None l
l i
100
- Total Temporary Modifications l-M
- o. Fort Calhoun Goal Nd 80-ui
[ 60-
.ec
- ra 40 t
CF---- G ---- A g.....e......e.....h s
Aug Sep Oct
.Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul 1989 1990 3 May 1990 N
12-E June 1990 Nd U July 1990 ui 9
af bi e c 6-o 3-um 0-5 0-3 3-6 6-9 9-12
> 12 Age in Months I
l TEHPORARY MODIF1 CAT 10N$
(EXCLUDINGSCAFFOLDING)
The too graph shows, total number of temporary modifications installed in the Fort "1oun Station and a Fort Calhoun goal.
The number of electricai temporary modifications and the number of mechanical temporary modifications have been deleted from this indicator because the Plant no longer categorizes temporary modifications in this manner.
At the end of July, there was a total. of 22 temporary modifications installed in the Fort Calhoun Station. The Fort Calhoun goal for the total number of installed temporary modifications is less than 15 installed temporary modifications.
The bottom graph, Ace of Temporary Modifications, displays the age of all temporary modifications by months installed in the plant.
Adverse Trend:
None SEP 62 & 71 i
'i
- ,?
50-L JOpen EAR's ce EAR's Closed During the Reporting' Month
.)
- EAR's > 30 Days Past Original Schedule i
^
40-o N f 30-u
\\
cE; l
bA 1
eR' 20-i r.
s 4
i 1
I i
0 i
Priority 1 Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 July 1990 i
l ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE RE0 VEST PRIORITY BREAKDOWN This indicator shows the number of op)en and closed Engineering Assistance Requests (EAR's broken down into priorities at the end.of the reporting month.
J Along with the priority-breakdown, the number of l
EAR's remaining open 30 days past the original schedule are shown-for each priority category.
>30 Days Past Priority Doen Closed Oriainal Schedule f4 !X.de M 19.x.All M t!ay.@.!1.u.1 J
Priority 1 13 7
6 0
1 1
12 6
3 Priority 2 19 12 12 4
3 0
14 2
4
.i Priority 3 14 27 30 5
4 0
11' 11 11 Priority 4 13 21 21 2
3 1
11 10 10 Total 59 67 69 11 11 2
48 29 28 Adverse Trend: None SEP 62 l,
150-
-e-Total ECN's Open l
X-ECN's Opened During the Month
-+- ECN's Completed During the Month i-120-N-
u m
b
' 90-g
/ \\,
o i
f
.l
\\
E
,x, o [~
\\,
0-
~' '\\
/
4 '
C N
l ~,'s, l
Y'
~ \\.,a/,Y ',;u
~
l l
c
/
\\N 5
/
IX--
--M A
\\
,X 30 j
g o~
l s
j
'n O
,0 O
Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug 1989 1990 ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE STATUS The indicator shows the total number of open 1
Engineering Change Notices (ECN's), the number. of ECN's opened during the reporting month, and the number of ECN's completed during the reporting month.
At the end of July,1990, there was a total of 95 open ECN's. During the month of July, 34 ECN's were opened, and 21 ECN's were completed.
Adverse Trend:
None SEP 62.
300 O Document Change-we Substitute Replacement Item Facility Changes 250-
+
200-183
??
FE~M 150-M ll 100-m =a in1 78 -
!EW 50-42
=
g M R 20 20 0
Total ECN's ECN's Opened ECN's Completed Total ECN's Open During the Month During the Month Received L
ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE BREAKDOWN This indicator breaks down the total number of Engineering Change
-Notices (ECN's) that remain open at the end of the reporting month, the number of ECN's that were. opened during the reporting month, the number of ECN's that were completed during the reporting month, and-l the number of ECN's received by. Design. Engineering durin the reporting month into several categories. These categories in lude:
l ECN's requiring a document change to complete, ECN's requiring.
substitute replacement items to complete, and ECN's requiring facility-changes to complete.
Total Ooen Opened Comoleted Received Document Changes 42 20 4
202 r
Substitute Replacement 33 4
6 183 l.
Facility Changes.
20 10 7
78 Adverse Trend:
None SEP 62 L
5-E 1990 Rec:rdable Injury Frequ.ncy Rate
~
-x-1989 Recordable Injury Frequency Rate 4.5[
+- 5 Year Average Recordable Injury Frequency Rate 4
3.5-GOOD 3-4, R
a 2.5-j t
e 4
M
',, +., ',
2-N, i
,, A',, -
' +..,
i g
1.5-N,
+...,.....+.,
-#.....+.....+.....+
1-y Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec RECORDABLE INJURY CASES FRE0VENCY RATE This indicator shows the monthly recordable injury cases frequency rate
.in column form. The above graph also includes the 1989 recordable injury cases-frequency rate and the Fort Calhoun Station 5 year average recordable injury cases frequency rate.
A recordable injury case is reported if Nuclear Operations Division personnel are injured on the job and require corrective medical l'
treatment. The recordable cases frequency rate is computed on a year-to-date basis. There were zero recordable injury cases reported during the month of July. There has been a total of three recordable injury cases so far in 1990.
There were eleven recordable cases reported in 1989, eleven reported in 1988, and eight reported in 1987. The year end recordable injury frequency rates for 1987, 1988, and 1989 were 2.5, 2.6, and 2.2 respectively.
Adnese Trend: None SEP 15 & 26 t
1 s
Licensee Ev:nt Report 7 p
R Personnel Errors Reported in LERs
- Cumulative Licensee Event Reports
--- Cumulative Personnel Errors Reported in LERS 46.
50-39 40-31
- 30-y 4
i 20-
~
12 10-0
" III
'87
'88
'89
'Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 i
NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED IN LER'S The Number of Personnel Errors Reported in LER's Indicator-
')
reports the - Licensee Event Reports (LER's) by their event date.
In July, 1990 there were 2 LER's reported. Out of the 2 LER's which occurred, there were zero LER's attributable to personnel error.
There have been 21 LER's reoorted so far in 1990 and 6 LER's have been attributable to personnel errors.
Adverse Trend:
None SEP 15 i
i,
e
____________.m___._.__.____._.__________.__.____.___._j
i I
J Nuclear Divistns Turn:v;r Rate
- OPPD Corporate Turnover Rate
)
t
. 8-l l
~
T 6-u r-n i
0 y
e 4-r R
a t
2-e C
Nuclear Operations Production Engineering Nuclear Services Division Division Division PERSONNEL TURNOVER RATE The turnover rate for three Nuclear Divisions is shown for the last twelve months.
The personnel turnover rate is plotted against the OPPD corporate tur6over rate of 4.0%. This OPPD corporate turnover rate' is based on the turnover rate over the last three years.
Adverse
' rend:
The turnover rate for the Nuclear Operat ons Division (NOD) and the Production Engineering Division (PED) are higher than the OPPD corporate turnover rate. These high turnover rates are due to 28 resignations from N0D which occurred within the last twelve months and 9 resignations from PED which occurred within the last twelve months. l 1,
r 600
' Actual Staffing 561 Ii i Authorized Staffing
,34 o
P 400-s m...,3,-
r
$1El5ll$lh s
o
- y"-fj) n
... ;1,,
n
$200-
[,S., h.!
195 205 j
x.4 n.m i..
j?$690;
%'fff.. 3y>
y yq-g w
,. 7,.., ;,-
l
. ;{
55 52 0
Nuclear Operations Production Engineering Nuclear Services i
Division Division Division STAFFING LEVEL The authorized and actual staffing levels are shown for the three Nuclear Divisions.
Adverse Trend: None SEP 24 l
l l
i
( ~i:
.n
\\i.
,. j-
+
((g+Y 8
s I
ISRO Exa]inaticn Pass Ratio b
-100-8 b
N...4 0
S i 80-j R.
l0
/
1 y
p
^ai 60-
?
3 9
-s-
.a 40-t W,
i ; ;,
a
.o'
}
20-3
.No Exams No Fr.ams
. No Exan.s A
Administered Uministered Administered
~
i g
^
-NRC Administered NRC Administered NR( Administered OPPD Administered
. Generic-Site Specific Re ualification Requalification Fundamental
- Exams Exams Exams Exams' 1
,q:3,
SRO LICENSE EXAMINATION PASS RATIO-1 The SR0 License Examination Pass' Ratio Indicator. shows the
~
number of NRC administered. Generic Fundamentals Exams (GFE's),
the number of NRC administered Site Specific Exams, the number
-of NRC administered license requalification exams, and the i
4 number of OPPD administered license requalification exams.
'"C I
No SRO License examinations were administered during July, 1990. The table below lists the examination pass ratio for.
examinations which have been taken during 1990.
n g
OPPD' ADMINISTERED-NRC ADMINISTERED
- Requal Generic Fund.
Site Spec.
Requal.
l 4
DATE
% PASS RATIO
% PASS RATIO
% PASS RATIO
% PASS RATIO O
l, L
Feb 1990 100 W
Rv.trse Trend:
None l '
l
.'[-
.' j i -
I lR0 Examination Pass Ratio 100-
+
R 80-0 p
a s
60-s R
a 40-t i
]
l o
20-m No Exams No Exams Administered Administered NRC Administered NRC Administered NRC Administered OPPD Administered ~
Generic Site Specific Requalification Requalification Fundamental Exams Exams Exams Exams R0 LICENSE EXAMINATION PASS RATIO The R0 License Examination Pass Ratio Indicator shows the number of NRC administered Generic Fundamentals Exams (GFC's), the number of NRC administered Site Specific Exams, the number of NRC administered license requalification exams, and the number of OPPD administered license requalification exams.
No R0 License examinations were administered during the month of July, 1990. The table below lists the examination pass ratio for examinations which have been taken during 1990.
OPPD ADMINISTERED NRC ADMINISTERED Requal Generic Fund.
Site Spec.
Requal.
DATE
% PASS RATIO
% PASS RATIO
% PASS RATIO
% PASS RATIO Feb 1990 100 May 1990 100 Adverse Trend:
None
}
' y.
i
.+
l lSRO Exams Admiriistered
.3. ;
ii -
2':
120-SRO Exams Passed =
+
R0 Exams Administered
,j si::::: R0 Exams Passed.
4 N
15-u
-m--
b.
3 1
e l
r-l
- o. 10-s f
f W
5
- E 3 l
,(
l l
.x a
9l 7
m_
5 p
s
-s g
lll l
0 l
ri Feb sMar Apr May
'Jun -Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec-Jan-
)
1990-
-1991 j
i ij
- LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS This indicator shows the -number of SR0= and R0.c uizzes and exams; taken and passed each monti. These internally administered: quizzes 1
-and exams are used to plot. the SRO and R0
,5 candidates' monthly progress.
During the month of July,19:s0, no SRO exams were administered.
3
~
I During the month of July,1990, no R0 exams u
were administered.
Adverse Trend:
None k,,
9 V
,o 1
iiii Hotlines Initiated 50 :
Hotlines Closed
- i:!:i: Hotlines Open Under 4 Weeks-Hotlines Open Over 4 Weeks 40-m-
4
. b 35-e r
30-t o
f ' 25-
+;
H 20-
[
o 6
f t
.Aug Sep Oct Nov
'Dec Jan Feb
. Mar Apr-May Jun' Jul 1989 1990 HOTLINES This indicator shows the number of Hotlines initiated during. the reporting month, the number of Hotlines closed -during the reporting month, the number of Hotlines that remain.open and are less than four weeks old, and.the number. of Hotlines that remain open and are older than four weeks-old.
During the month of July, '1990, there were 11 Hotlines initiated, 13 Hotlines closed, 9 Hotlines that remained open and were-less than four weeks old, and 3 Hotlines that remained open and were older than four weeks old.
Adverse Trend: None '
.4 s Planned Classroom Hours I
IActual. Classroom Hours T:
h 3-o, u
's P_
a' I
$.~
4 S
2 11 l
o nu l
h.
l a
g-g 7
?h-5 g
g 9
1-f
[
f h-- h 5
l I
,f d
l-i' 0
Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun-9 Jul' Aug 1989 1990-
-i Ct.ASSR00M (INSTRUCTOR) HOURS This indicator displays the number of planned I
classroom hours and the number of actual classroom hetis for the Fort Calhoun Station.
This indicator is one month behind the reporting month due to the time to collect and process the needed information.
l Adverse Trend:
None l
1 j-.
q.<
t.,
f~lOperations o
5-lill Maintenance 4
Chemistry and Radiation Protection 30
/ Technical. Support-
-[
.T:
i GenerallEmployee Tr'aining h,
Other-
- w-
.o 25-u
- s a
n d-10-q
- 5-
""T
'r r1
,.,T
.1
. ]..
g A
.L 5
0 jl Jul
'Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan
'Feb Mar-Ape May Jun 1989 1990
.TpTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TRAINING
- This indicator shows the total number of student hour:: for Operations, j
Maintenance, Chemistry and Radiation Protection, Technical Support, Li General Employee Training, and~Other training conducted for the Fort Calhoun' Station.
J This indicator is one month behind the reporting month due to the time 1
needed to collect and' evaluate the data.
J Total Hours 1
L TRAINING MAY 1990 JUN 1990 L
Operations 3,082 2,623 Maintenance 2,169 3,843 i
Chemistry and 725 826 N
Radiation Protection Technical Support 555 301 General Employee Training 2,028 4,604 l
Other 194 722 l
Total 8,753 12,919 Adverse Trend:
None n
N 4
.2
- Violations per 1000 Inspection' Hours
- G Fort Calhoun. Goal 151
- 11.1;
-l
'10.6 l
j
[
GOOD 12-
- '?
4 v
7.1
!a 9-1 Y
O--- G---- O ---- - --- O---4---~O--- - O --- ; O --- -& --- O m
A#
,?
(( fj
.6-
%; %.c i
p t
f M 3-I
& ??
)h 0
'87
'88
'89 Jan -Feb Mar Apr May-Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct.Nov~ Dec
.1990 g
Iy
' VIOLATIONS PER 1000 INSPECTION HOURS-This indicator displays.the number of NRC violations cited
~
in' inspection reports -per 1000 NRC inspection hours. This indicator was calculated using the number of violations and the - number of inspection ~ hours from submitted inspection reports. These inspection reports consisted of reports from-the: months'offJanuary, 1990, through June, 1990.-
This indicator is one month behind the reporting month due to, the time involved with collecting and processing the data.
The violations per 1000 inspection hours indicator was reported as 7.6 for thu month of June, 1990.
7 q-There have been a total of.1,972 inspection hours u 1990 which have resulted in'15 violations.
The goal for the number of violations per 1000 inspection hours is less than 8.2.
j Adverse-Trend:
None c t
m a,
,+
x s
j ju N}
F 75-l.; Humber of Violations During-the Last 12 Months W Number of!NCV's During the Last-12 Months
.,,f m.m.<
V
- u..
- _1
'"'M J o
r,; )
~,a:
t - 47 Nu'
- 41 41
~
oc a
-g".
b 38 36 3.2
.,s y
r-O
'o f di 25-
'N3 19 -
20 21-21 C.
16
-y.
14 i
112 p
+
-Jan Feb-Mar Apr
- May
Jun Jul Aug Sep-Oct Nov' Dec 1990
+
CUMULATIVE VIOLATIONS AND NCV's (TWELVE-MONTH:RUNNINGTOTAL)
The-Cumulative Violations ano Non-Cited Violations (NCV's). Indicator shows the cumulative number of violations for--the last
- twelve months and the: cumulative number of NCV's for-the last twelve months.
During the last twelve months, 34 violations have been identified. and 21 NCV's have been identified.
Adverse Trend; None t
i
?. 7, ;
m L
- Total Outstanding CAR's-Outstanding CAR's > Six Months 0ld-lN,
. Outstanding CAR's That,Are Modification Related 200-j l.
l
~150-o a
Nf' u.
L-100-eR-J ir' q'
n s
0-c Aug..Sep Oct
,Nov' ~Dec' Jan.Feb! Mar..Apr May? Jun- -Jul J,
I' 1989
~1990 L
1 1
i OUTSTANDING CORRECTIVE-ACTION REPORTS'
.c This indicator shows 'the total. number of 1
i -
outstanding Corrective Action Reports (CAR's), the number of outstanding CAR's that
. 7 are greater than six months < old, and the number 'of outstanding CAR's that~ are modification related.
As of the end of July,1990 there were 139 outstanding CAR's reports, 59 CAR'.s that are greater than six months old, and 9 CAR's that are modification related.
1 Adverse Trend:
None i
l\\ l '
.c 1
n 1
- f[
y yj.'402 e-N00.0v;rdue CAR's 4
u-30-
-6 : N00: CAR's With Extensions Granted y
ec
-fAL20-1 eR510
. g--@ % _ A.--
A _ q _ _A 1
r
. s.
0 Nov Dec4 Jan Feb Mar.. -Apr; -May..
Jun Jul
.Aug; _Sep Oct
~1989:
1990-
~
. n : 50-0.0verdue M s Nf 40-u
-b PED CAR's With Extensions Granted
- C 30-bA e R.l r 10-J
_, -g,,
Nov. Dec Jan Feb
-Mar Apr May En 51 Aug' Sep' Oct j
l 1989 1990
.10-Other Overdue CAR's
.N -
8-g
.u.
-b Other CAR's With Extensions Granted.
6-
'sC bA
'4 E
e R --
'r'-
2-
' N' ' "
~
s-. 0
^
a" Nov
.Dec Un FD dr Apr May J u n -.
51 Aug. -Sep Oct 1989 1990 i
OVERDUE AND-Et 'NDED CORRECTIVE ACTION' REPORTS-This indicator ~ shows the - number..of overdue - CAR's and. the number of
' CAR's which received extensions broken _down by organization.
R OVERDUE CAR's
. 0RGANIZATION MAY 90 JUN 90 JUL 90 n
l N0D 13
.0 0
PED-
-4 0
0 a
Others 0
0 0
Total 17 0
0 CAR's WITH EXTENSIONS GRANTED ORGANIZATION MAY 90 JUN 90 JUL 90
- N0D 4
4 4
u PED
-S 8
7 1
L Others 1
1 0
l Total 10 13 11 Adverse Trend: None l
l.
Ny150-
-B-NOD CAR's >6 Months Old mCf 100-
-h'=N00 CAR's <6 Months Old e
50 --O '
- - - ~ ~O~ ~ ~O ' %
t'
-c 3
g g
y 9
Dec; Jan Feb._ Mar -
Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep-Oct Nov 1989 1990 150-o
.N f C PED CAR's >6 Months Old
.u 100-
-b PED CAR's <6 Months Old mC bA' I
')
[~
'S p
.s o
Dec Jan Feb-Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov t
1989 1990 4
o 30-Nf
-G-Other CAR's >6 Months Old
{
20-
-b Other CAR's <6 Months Old Le 10-6-
,6 ' A -6 C
C C
O C
s o
Dec-Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug "ep Oct-Nov 1989-1990
.4 CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS-CURRENT STATUS This indicator shows-the number of. CAR's that are older-than 6 months I
and the number of CAR's that are less than 6 months old broken down by organization.
-CAR's GREATER THAN 6 MONTHS OLD ORGANIZATION MAY 90 JUN 90 JUL 90 N0D 7
10 8
PED 40 49 49 Others 3
4 3
Total 50 63 60 CAR's LESS THAN 6 MONTHS OLD ORGANIZATION MAY 90 JUN 90 JUL 90
-N00 49 55 39 PED 41 34 31 Others 7
9 8
Total 97 98 78 Adverse Trend:
None '
e
.a 1989
'1990 OPPD SIGNIFICANT NRC OPPO SIGNIFICANT
-lWtC-c-
SALP FUNCTIONAL-AREA :
CAR's CAR's VIOLATIONS 'LER'S CAR's CAR's' VIOLATIONS ~LER'S A. Plant-Operations-11 0
8.
2 30.(4). 0 1
-9l(1)
B. Radiological Controls'
-30 1
2 1
21 2
0 10 C. Maintenance /
140 8
2 10' 150 (13)
-6 (1)7 5.(1)-
4.L(1)
Surveillance D. Emergency 8
~0 0
0 6
- 0.
2 0
Preparednets-E. Security 26 2
6 10 19 '(6) 0 4-1-
F. Engineering /
134 2
-7 7:
'78 (6) 1 2.
7:
Technical Support-G. Safety Assessment /
68 0
1 0
11 (1) 0 0'
0?
Quality Verification 0
0 0
1 1
(1) 0 0
0~
f H. Other Total 417 13 26 31 316.(31) 9 (1) 14.(1) 21' - ; (2)'
CAR'S ISSUED VERSUS SIGNIFICANT CAR'S VERSUS NRC' VIOLATIONS ISSUED VERSUS LER'S REPORTED-The above matrix shows the number of Corrective Action-Reports (CAR's) issued L by the. Nuclear:
t Services Division versus the' number of Significant CAR's issued by - the. Nuclear Services' Division.
versus the number of violations. issued by the-Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for the - Forts Calhoun Station in 1989 and 1990. Included in this'. table is the number of ' Licensee Event Reports (LER's) identified by the station each year. The number of NRC violations reported arefone' month-behind the reporting month due to the time-involved in collecting and processing the violations.
In July, 1990, there were 31 CAR's issued, one Significant CAR issued, and 2' LER's -identified.
During June one NRC violation was : issued; This violation was not attributable to personnel error..
~
The monthly distribution-of ^ CAR's,1Significant CAR's, NRC' violations :- and ' LER's are shown : in.
~
parentheses.
SEP 15, 20 &'21-O
m Mt l
7i
- SIGNIFICANT-ITEMS OF-INTEREST-l.
- This section is' intended to provide information on events which are significant to the Fort Calhoun Station and-will give a " heads-up" look at what is' scheduled in:the coming months.
,j
- - The NRC Emergency;0perating Procedures -(E0P) ' Review -
is scheduled for August'20-through_ August 31, 1990.
j
-- The Procedure Upgrade Project and the Plant have-j approved. and issued _811; 2'fety related -procedures.
This. meets a' Safety Enhai.ccment : Program (SEP) Item j
Number 48 milestone commitment.
1 The NRC Maintenance Inspection Team follow-up review has been rescheduled until November, 1990.
i The 56 day 1991 Refueling Outage is planned to start 9/28/91-and finish 11/22/91.
The 1990. Emergency Preparedness Graded Exercise is
-planned for the week of 11/26/90.
p Two management meetings were held with the NRC during the month of July,1990._ One management ' meeting: was i
~ held-to discuss the results of the last Sy)stematicperiod
' Assessment of Licensee-Performance (SALP which ended April 30, 1990. The other management meeting was held concerning security.
I i
i i
I I '..
1 l
F0kT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARA'4ETER DEFINITIONS:
=
" * ~
~ AGE OF OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE WORK' ORDERS 4
This-indicator tracks - the. total number of outstanding corrective non-outage. Maintenance Work-- Orders at the Fort Calnoun ~ Station: versus their age in months.
1 AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAITING PARTS This indicator is defined as the percentage of -open, non-outage, maintenance work 'orderse that; are. on: hold awaiting parts, to the total number of open, non-outage, maintenance work ^ orders.-
AUXILIARY SYSTEMS CHEMISTRY HOURS OUTSIDE STATION LIMITS l
The - cumulative hours that the Component Cooling Water system is-outside
~ he station. chemistry limit. The hours are accumulated-from the-first-t
. sam)le exceeding the limit until additional sampling _ shows the parameter l
to ae back within limits.
L CHECK VALVE FAILURE RATE The Fort Calhoun check valve failure ' rate and the industry check. valve failure rate (failures per 1 million component hours). The. data for the industry failure rate is three months behind the Performance Indicators J
h Report reporting mo' nth. This. indicator tracks-performance for.SEP item l
~ 4 3.
CLASSROOM (INSTRUCTOR) HOURS The = number of planned classroom hours and the number of actual classroom L
hours'for the Fort Calhoun Station.
CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT CURRENT STATUS The number of Corrective. Action Reports (CAR's) that are older than 6
-l months' and the number of CAR's that are less than 6 months-old broken down by organization for the last 6: months.
CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG GREATER THAN 3 MONTHS OLD The percentage of total outstanding corrective maintenance items, - not l
requiring an outage, that are greater than three months old at the end of I
the period reported.
p p
.r 1
l l
l
e p
' FORT C LHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS'(CONTINUED)
CUMULATIVE VIOLATIONS AND NON-CITED VIOLATIONS (TWELVE-MONTH RUNNIN( TOTAL)
The cumulative number of violations and Non-Cited Violations > for the last 12 months.
i L'
DAILY THERMAL OUTPUT-0 The daily core thermal output: as measured from computer point XC105 in
- thermal megawatts.
j DIESEL GENERATOR RELIABILITY u
A : Diesel ' Generator (DG) unit; consists of the engine, generator,.
combustion air - system, cooling water system, fuel supply. system, lubricating oil system, starting ~ air system, autostart controls, manual controls, and diesel generator breaker.
Reliability of each DG unit will be reported _for two situations, one for l
the last 20 demands and one for the last 100 demands. Reliability is the ratio of the number of successful runs to the number of demands, for each individual-DG unit.-
h A successful' run is defined as a start of a DG unit and the loading of l
this unit' to a minimum of 50% rated load (1250 KW) for' a' minimum' time i
period of 60 minutes.
,7 A.. failure is defined as the f ailure to start, accelerate, and assume the 1
design rated load for.the given time period as specified for an emergency L
.or a valid test, a
L l
l The total. number-of demands (or valid tests) will' be equal' to the sum of
-the failures and the successful runs.
This ' definition of DG Reliability was taken from the U.S.
Nuclear j
Regulatory Commission " Regulatory Guide 1.108, Revision 1". This is the definition being applied in calculating the diesel generator reliability at the Fort Calhoun Station.
- DISABLING INJURY FREOUENCY-RATE-(LOST TIME ACCIDENT RATE)
L This indicator is defined as the number of accidents for all utility l
personnel-permanently assigned to the station, involving days away from
-l work per 200,000 man-hours worked (100 man-years). This does not include contractor personnel. This indicator tracks personnel performance for t
Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Item 26.
p-l l' W
Y
m FORT-CALHOUNPERFOR.MNCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED)
DOCUMENT REVIEW (BIENNIAL)
The Document' Review Indicator shows the number of documentse reviewed
.during.the reoorting month, the numbe' of documents' scheduled for1 review
~
during the : reporting month, and the number of-document reviews that are overdue.
. ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE RE0 VEST (EAR's) PRIORITY BREAKDOWN-The number of open and closed EAR's broken down into; priorities at the end of the - reporting month. This - indicator tracks performance for SEP item 62.
ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE (ECN) BREAKDOWN The breakdown of the total number of open ECN's, the number of.ECN's that were opened during the reporting month, the. number of ECN's that were-
.V
. completed during the reporting month, and the number of ECN's received during the-reporting month -into three categories. These categories include;- 1) docua nt changes are required to complete the ECN's, 2) substitute or repiacement items are required to complete the ECN's, or 3)
-facility changes are required to complete the ECN's. This indicator tracks performance for SEP item 62.
ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE (ECN) STATUS The number of ECN's that remain open at the end of the reporting month, the number of ECN's that were opened during the reporting month,.and the number of ECN's that are completed during the reporting month. This indicator tracks performance for SEP itera 62.
E0VIPMENT FORCED OUTAGES PER 1000 CRITICAL HOURS Equipment forced outages per.1000 critical hours is the. inverse of the mean time between forced outages caused' by equipment failures. The mean time is equal to the number of hours the reactor is critical in a' period (1000 hours0.0116 days <br />0.278 hours <br />0.00165 weeks <br />3.805e-4 months <br />) divided by the number of forced outages caused by equipment failures in that period.
EQUIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR This indicator is defined as the rr,tio of pross available generation to gross maximum generation, expressed as a percentage. Available generation is the. energy that can be produced if the unit is operated at the maximum power level permitted by equipment and regulatory. limitations. Maximum generation is the energy that can be produced by a unit in a given period if operated continuously at maximum capacity.
EXPEDITED PURCHASES The percentage of expedited purchases which occurred during the reporting
-month. compared to the total number of purchase orders generated. !
e
FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS (CONTINUED) t FORCED'0VTAGE RATE
.i Thisu indicator is defined 'as 'the percentage of time ~ that the unit Was-Li unavailable due to forced events; compared to the time planned-for electrical generation. Forced events are failures or other - unplanned -
conditions. that' require removing the unit from service before the end of' the nextt weekend. Forced events include startup f ailures - and events-.
t
-initiated while the - unit is in reserve shutdown (i.e., _ theiunit is available but'not in service.
r FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR l
~!
This indicator is defined as the-steady-state primary coolant 1-131 activity, corrected for the tramp uranium contribution and normalized to-a commoe purification rate, t
Tramp urhnium is fuel which has-been deposited on reactor core internals
'from previous defective fuel _ or is present on the surface of fuel 1.
elements from the manufacturing process.
Steady. state is ' defined as continuous: operations -above 85 percent power
+
for at least seven days.
i GASE0US RADI0 ACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT This; indicator displays the total number of Curies of all gaseous radioactive nuclides released from the Fort Calhoun Station.
GROSS HEAT RATE F
L Gross heat rate is defined as the ratio of total thermal energy in.
British Thermal Units- (BTV) produced by the reactor to the total gross electrical energy produced by the generator in kilowatt-hours (KWH).
HAZARD 0US WASTE PRODUCED L
The total amount (in' Kilograms) of -non-halogenated ~ hazardous -waste, halogenated hazardous waste, and other hazardous waste produced by the i
Fort Calhoun Station each month.
HOTLINES-The number of Hotlines that-are initiated, closed, overdue, and open for-a: given month. A Hotline is a training document sent out for immediate l
s review. The Hotline should _ be reviewed and signed within 5 days.of receipt of the Hotline.
L F?l' -
FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCE'PARAMETERDEFINITIONS:(CONTINUED)'~
l a
HOURS CHEMISTRY IS OUTSIDE OWNERS GROUP GUIDELINES Total hours for 13 secondary. side chemistry parameters exceeding:
1 guidelines during power operation.
Power operation-is= defined as greater-e than 30% power.
The 13 parameters tracked are steam generator pH,' cation'
-conductivity, boron silica, chloride, = sulf ate,' sodium, : feed water - pH, dissolved oxygen, hydrazine, iron, copper, and condensate pump discharge 1
dissolved oxygen.
IN-LINE CHEMISTRY INSTRUMENTS OUT-OF-SERVICE Total number of t in-line chemistry instruments that are out-of-service'in the Secondary System and the Post Accident Sampling System (PASS).
INVENTORY ACCURACY 1
..The percentage of line items:that are counted each month by the warehouse which need count adjustments.
1 INVOICE BREAKDOWN The number ~ of invoices that are on hold due to shelf life, CQE, and miscellaneous reasons.
)
R LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS-3 This indicator shows the number of SR0 and/or R0 quizzes and. exams that are administered and passed each month.
LIOUID RADI0 ACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT i
L This indicator displays the volume of liquid radioactive waste rele'ased from the radioactive waste monitor tanks. The curies from all releases L
from the Fort Calhoun Station to the Missouri River are also shown.
I LOGGABLE/ REPORTABLE INCIDENTS (SECURITY)
The total number of security incidents for the reporting month. This
= indicator tracks-security performance for Safety Enhancement Program Item l
Number 58.
MAINTENANCE EFFECTIVENESS The number of Nuclear Plant Reliability Data System (NPRDS) components with.more than one failure and the number of NPRDS components with more than two failures during the last twelve months.
l V..
7-Q
- ( f.
,7
-r"If#
, h Y- <fY '~
M
+
i-
..'3 u
'O f ;
. (';'
7._ g !'
_t*
s s u,'t f i 'g6 f
' \\. <t>.~
s
.1
. j d
I 3
j 43 >
r
-..f 4
']-
4 i
.C
- 1 [3 ) :.
i eb
- )
e s.
t.
J.
,~l
. t v
p;
..[
.y F
, f
-t i
__l 9
i
?
i.f' F
4.'r I.
l
^ 11 4
4i 1.
y i
i.
N.,,.
u.
gs_-
/
t'.
,+
'n Q
-9 3
i
'7
- s..
h i'
'M I
' h l
f.
N r
.. -li O.
.,9 s~p jb
[,,.
_E i
b,
f'
'4
.f L'
a
!l-s VI i
hm q.,
s
.y
.)
d
+
p.
- p;._
B 6'
t
?
,..Q 4
y e.
.,3
.'l
..aA
,'?'
f e
f l
E u
i.
[
w 4
..)
5 t
}
$ ? ' u.
. 3 e.
i v
6 O
-.?
m:> ;
y i
a ti q
x I'
i k
('
s, e
{-
s
- y. '
r1 g
s1 w,
,+.,- ' -
^
^ '}
w
.n------~~^'~~
_, ~ - ~ ' ' '
pg.gwa+%#%*M+*.gs w J --
s
<=
FORTLCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS-(CONTINUED)
~
-MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BACKLOG
-The number-of corrective non-outage maintenance work orders that remain open--at the end of the reporting month. This indicator was _ added to1the 1
Performance Indicators Report to trend open ' corrective - non-outage maintenance work orders -as. stated in Safety Enhancement Program. (SEP)
. Item No. 36.
^
MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN This indicator is a breakdown of corrective.on-outage maintenance work orders by several-categories that remain open at the end of the reporting month.
MAINTENANCE OVERTIME i
'4
.The percentage-of overtime hours compared to normal hours for maintenance. This includes 0 PPD personnel as well as contract personnel, j
j.
MATERIAL RE00EST PLANNING The: percent of material recuests- (MR's) for issues with their request date the same as their need cate compared to the total number of MR's.
-MATERIAL RE0 VESTS AWAITING APPROVAL o
The number of material requests awaiting approval at the end of the' reporting month broken down by their age in days.
MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATION EXPOSURE' The total! maximum amount of Gamma and. Neutron (Whole Body)- radiation received by'an individual person working at the Fort Calhoun Station on a monthly, quarterly, and annual basis.
NUMBER OF HOT SPOTS The number of radiological hot spots which' have been identified and documented to exist at the - Fort Calhoun Station at the end of the
' eporting month. A hot spot is _ a small localized source of radiation. A i
r hot spot occurs when the contact dose rate of an item-is at least 5 times L
the General Area dose rate and the item's dose rate is equal to or l
greater than 100 mrem / hour.
7 ll L
l 1 -
J
V 1
FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS.(CONTINUED)-
1 F
- NUMBER OF NUCLEAR ~ PLANT RELIABILITY DATA SYSTEM (NPRDS)' FAILURE REPORTS SUBMITTED
~
- The data plotted is-the total number
- -of NPRDS component failures
,a_
(confirmed and possible) and the number of ' confirmed' NPRDS component' s
f ailures.- The total number of NPRDS component failuresf are based on the
' number of failure reports that have been sent.to the Institute 1of Nuclear
- Operations-(INPO).
Confirmed NPRDS component ' failures are based.upon f ailure reports that have been accepted:by' INPO. Possible NPRDS component failures are based upon failure reports that are still under review by'INPO.~ -
1 NPRDS is the Nuclear Plant. Reliability Data Systemi and is a utili.ty_
industry users group program which has been outlined by INPO-and implemented at the Fort Calhoun Station.
L NUMBER OF OUT-0F-SERVICE CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS
-l
?
A control room instrument that - cannot perform. its design function is
.I considered as out-of-service. A control room instrument which has had' a j
' Maintenance Work Order (MWO) written for it and has not been repaired by the end of the reporting aeriod is. considered out-of-service and will be q
s y
counted. The duration of tie out-of-service condition is not considered.'
Computer CRTs are not considered as control room instruments.
l l
NUMBER OF PERSONGL ERRORS REPORTED IN LER'S The number of Licensee Event Reports (LERs) attributed to personnel' error on the original LER submittal. This indicator trends personnel l
performance for SEP Item No. 15.
}
NUMBER OF MISSED SURVEILLANCE TESTS RESULTING IN trCENSEE EVENT REPORTS The. number of Surveillance Tests (ST's) that ' result in Licensee Event t
Reports- (LER's) during the -rep (orting. This indicator tracks missed ST's i
for Safety Enhancement Program SEP) Item Numbers 60 and 61.
l l
OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET The year to date budget compared to the. actual expenditures for operations and maintenance.
OUTSTANDING CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS
- This indicator displays the total number of outstan. ding Corrective Action Reports (CAR's), the number of CAR's that are older than six months and the number of modification related CAR's.
.ts e
+
. FORT'CALHOUN,PERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED)
{
o OUTSTANDING' MODIFICATIONS The number fof Modification' Requests = (MR'S) -in any' state between the1 issuance of a Modification Number and the completion of the drawing update.
Form /C-1133 Backlog /In Progress The Form FC-1133 has not been plant approved.
f Modification Requests Being Reviewed This category includes:
t 1.) * -Modification Requests that are not yet reviewed-
- i
- 2. ) -
- ModificationRequestsbeingreviewedby)the Nuclear Projects Review Committee (NPRC
[
3.)1*
Modification Requests being(reviewed by the
)
Nuclear Projects Committee NPC)'
h These -Modification-Requests may be. reviewed several times-before they are approved for_ accomolishment or cancelled. Some of-l=
these Modification Requests are returned to Engineering for more information, some approved for evaluation, some-approved for study, and some approved for planning. Once planning is completed and the scope of the work is clearly defined, these Modification-
~
Requests may be approved for accomplishment with a year assigned for construction or they may be cancelled.
All of these
/
different. phases require review.-
3 Design Engineering Backlog /In Progress 4
. Nuclear Planning has assigned a year in which construction will be'c mpleted and design work may be in progress.
Co'nstruction Backlog /In Progress
\\
The ' Construction Package has. been issued or construction has l
begun but the modification has not been accepted by the System Acceptance Committee (SAC).
' Design Engineering Update Backlog /In Progress PED has received the Modification Completion. Report but the drawings have not been updated.
OVERDUE AND EXTENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS The' number of overdue Corrective Action Reports (CAR's) and the number of CAR's which received extensions broken down by organization for the last 6 months'.
I-
-100-1
fy FORTCAiHOUN' PERFORMANCE ~PARAMETERDEFINITIONS'(CONTINUE 0) t' 0 -.
PERSONNEL RADIATION' EXPOSURE (CUMULATIVE)
- Collective radiation exposure is the total external whole-body dose received - by all on-site personnel (including contractors and visitors)
- during a time period,- as measured by the thermoluminescent dosimeter j
h.
- (TLD). Collective radiation exposure is' reported in units of man-rem.-
L This indicator-tracks radiological work performance for Safety
- ]
l; EnhancementProgram(SEP)ItemNumber54.
L PERSONNEL TURNOVER RATE The ratio of the number of: turnovers to average employment. A turnover is; a vacancy created: by voluntary resignation. from the company. Retirement, death, termination, transfers within the company,-and-part-time employees.
are not considered in turnover.
PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVEROVE This indicator is defined as the percentage of preventive maintenance items in the month.that were not completed by. the scheduled date plus a grace period. equal to 25 percent of the' scheduled interval. This.
9 indicator tracks revertive ma ntenance activities for Safety Enhancement e
Program (SEP) Item Number 41.
c 1
l-
' PRIMARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY --PERCENT OF HOURS OUT OF LIMIT The percent of hours out of. limit are for six primary chemistry parameters divided by the total number of hours possible for the month.'
- The key parameters used are: Lithium, Chloride, -Hydrogen, Dissolved Oxygen, Fluoride, and' Suspended Solids. EPRI limits are used..
PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE' INCIDENTS (MAINTENANCE)
~The = number. of-identified incidents concerning maintenance procedural problems, the number of _ closed IR's relcted ' to - the use of procedures 1
(includes the' number of closed IR's caused by procedural -noncompliance),
and the number Eof' closed procedural -noncompliance IR's. This indicator trends personnel performance for SEP' Item Numbers 15 and 41.
RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM
~The number of-identified poor radiological work practices (PRWP) f_or 'the
. reporting month. This indicator tracks radiological work performance for Safety Enhancement-(SEP) Item Number 52.
RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE' The ratio of preventive maintenance (including surveillance testing and calibration procedures) to the sum of non-outage corrective maintenance
- and preventive maintenance completed over the reporting period. The ratio,. expressed as a percentage, is calculated based on man-hours. This indicator tracks preventive maintenance activities for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Item Number 41.
s
-101-
1 m
FORTCALHOUN. PERFORMANCE.PARAMETERDEFINITIONS'(CONTINUED)
' RECORDABLE INJURY CASES FRE0VENCY RATE (RECORDABLE INJURY RATE)
The-number = of injuries - requiring more,than normal first aid per 200,000.
manhours worked. This indicator trends personnel performance for SEP Item -
No. 15 and SEP Item 26.
R0 LICENSE' EXAMINATION PASS RATIO y
The R0. license examination pass ratio for NRC - administeret' Generic Fundamentals Exams (GFE's), NRC administered Site Specific Exams, NRC administered license' requalification exams, and OPPD administered license requalification exams.
t i SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERFORMANCE INDEX.
f The-Chemistry Performance. Index- (CPI) -is a calculation based on the L
concentration of key impurities in the secondary side of the plant. These lS key impurities are the most likely cause of deterioration of: the steam generators. The chemistry parameters are reported only for the. period of time greater than.-30 percent power.
t
-The following equation is how the CPI-is calculated:
g CPI = ((Ka/0.8)-+-(Na/20) + (0 /10)) /.3-2 Where the following aarameters are monthly averages of; Ka = average 3 lowdown cation conductivity Na = average blowdown sodium concentration 02 " average condensate pump discharge dissolved oxygen concentration SECURITY INCIDENTS BREAKDOWN This indicator shows a percentile ~ breakdownL of the types of Security i
incidents for.tbc reporting month.
The following items are the types of Security incidents represented in this indicator.
L'icensee Designated Vehicles (LDV's)
Incidents related to the use of LDV.'s, e.g. keys lef t in the vehicle, loss of keys, or failure to return keys.
Security Badges Incidents involving lost / unattended badges,. badges removed from site, or failure to wear badges.
Escorting l
-102-
_,,,__.m_
. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ^ - - - - " - - " - ^ ' " - - - - ' - - - - - - ' - - - - - ~ " " - -
w FORTECALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED).
sp g._
SECURITYINCIDENTSBREAKDOWN(CONTINUEDI l
t Incidents,: involving escort : responsibilities, e.g.
improper
-1
- control or escort of a visitor (s)..
l
-Security System Failures Incidents - involving alarm system-failures, CCTV f ailures, security computer l f ailures, -terminal f ailures, door equipment failures, and card reader, failures.
Security Key Control-Incidents involving. Security key control, e.g.
lost Secur.ity; keys, Security keys removed from site, or failure to return Security keys.'This type of incident does not reflect-incidents-
.concerning.LDV keys.
1 Access Control-1 Incidents involving the inspection and control of personnel,
- packages, and vehicles, e.g.
failure to properly search.
o personnel, packages, and vehicles. This-item also includes the:
introduction of contraband or prohibited items into the'-
= Protected Area, or the attempted introduction of such items.
i This indicator tracks security performance for Safety Enhancement Program; (SEP)ItemNumber58.
SECURITY 3 SYSTEM FAILURES q
1 The number of ; Security incidents concerning. alarm systems f ailures, CCTV-failures, security. computer failures, terminal failures, door equipment L
failures, and' card reader failures. This' indicator -tracks security a
performance for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Item Number 58 SPARE' PARTS INVENTORY VALUE The dollar value of the spare parts inventory at the end of the -eporting period.
SPARE PARTS ISSUED The -dollar value of the spare parts. issued for the Fort Calhoun Station during the reporting period.
SR0 OPERATOR LICENSE EXAMINATION PASS RATIO l
The SR0 license examination pass ratio for NRC administered Generic Fundamentals Exams (GFE's), NRC administered Site Specific Exams, NRC administered license requalification exams, and OPPD administered license requalification exams.
-103-
=
=
=
_,1 FORT [CALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED).
- /
STAFFINGLEVEL The actua'l staffing level and the authorized staffing-level for the:
Nuclear Operations Division, the Production Engineering _ Division, and the Nuclear Services Division.
STATION NET GENERATION The net generation (sum) produced by the Fort:Calhoun Station during the reporting month.
' STOCK 0VT RATE
~
The total number of Pick Tickets that were generated during the reporting month and the total number of Pick Tickets that were generated during the reporting month with no parts available.
'The number of temporary mechanical and electrical configurations to the plant's systems.
Temporary configurations are defined as electrical jumpers, electrical
- blocks, mechanical jumpers, or mechanical blocks which are installed in the plant operating systems and are not shown on the-latest revision of the P&lD, schematic, connection, wiring, or flow diagrams.
Jumpers and blocks which are installed ior Surveillance Tests, Maintenance Procedures, Calibration Procedures, Special Procedures, or-0)erating Procedures are not considered as temporary modifications unless t ie jumper or block remains in place af ter the test or procedure is complete. Jumpers and blocks-installed in test or lab instruments are not considered as temporary modifications.
Scaffolding. is not' considered a temporarv modification. Jumpers and
-blocks which are installed and for which EEAx's have been submitted, will I
be considered as a temporary modifications until final resolution of the EEAR and the jumper or block is removed or is permanently recorded on the drawings.
This indicator tracks temporary modifications for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Item Number 62 & 71.
TOTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TRAINING The. total number of student hours of training for Operations, Maintenance, Chemistry and Radiation Protection, Technical Support, General Employee Training, and Other training conducted-for the Fort Calhoun Station.
-104-
'EIN i------.-.-------
/J e
^
I C
m,
. FORT:CALHOUN.PERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS'(CONTINUED)
?
r
+ TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMINATIONS
_ 'l Reportable E skin. and clothing contaminations-above background" levels greater etan 5000 dpm/100 cm squared. This. indicator' trends personnel performanc for SEP Item No. 15.
UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL-
- This indicator is. defined as the number of unplanned automatic. scrams j
(reactor protection system logic actuations) that occur while the reactor
-is. critical. The-indicator is further definedLas follows:
Unplanned means :that the scram.was not part of a planned. test or evolution.-
Scram means the automatic shutdown of the reactor 'by a rapid-
. insertion - of all control rods that is caused by-actuation of the reactor protection system. The scram signal may have.
resulted from exceeding a setpoint or may have.been spurious.
Automatic means that the initial signal that caused actuation of the reactor protection system logic was provided from one~of the sensors - monitoring plant parameters and conditions, rather 1
than the manual scrar switches (or pu;hbuttons) in the ' main control room.
Critical means that during the steady-state condition of the reactor prior to the scram, the effective multiplication factor (keff)wasequaltoone.
UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS This indicator is defined as-the sum of the following safety-system actuations:
the. number of unplanned Emergency Core Cooling System '(ECCS) actuations that result from reaching an ECCS actuation setpoint.
or from a spurious / inadvertent ECCS signal 3
the number of unplanned emergency AC power system actuations that result from a loss of power to a safeguards bus An unplanned safety system actuation occurs when an actuation setpoint-
]
for a ; safety-(system is reached or when a spurious or inadvertent signal 1
is generated ECCS only), and major equipment in the system is actuated.
Unplanned means that the system actuation was not part of ( planned test
-or evolution.
,)
. The' ECCS actuations to be counted are actuations of the high pressure injection system, the low pressure injection system, or the safety injection tanks.
m
-105-i i
- [:
A
n.
JL
{
FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS'(CONTINUED)
.p VIOLATIONS PER 1000 INSPECTION HOURS f
.1 "This indicator. is defined as' the number of violations sited.-in NRC inspection reports for-the Fort Calhoun Station per 1000 NRC, ins)ection hours. The violations are reported in the year that the inspect < on was actually performed and not based-on when the > inspection _ report is received. - The hours reported for each inspection report are used as the inspection hours.
VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLIO RADI0 ACTIVE WASJe -
This indicator i; Sfined as the-volume of low-level solid _ radioactive waste produced, ir final form ready for burial,-during a:given period. It is calculated using the amount of waste actually shipped for disaosal,
plus the changeL in inventory 'of waste in on-site storage in final form ready for' burial. The volume of radioactive waste that -is not yet in final -form ready 'for. shipment is not i ne'luded.
Low-level solid-l.
radioactive waste consists of dry active waste, sludges, resins, and g
evaporator bottoms generated as a result of nuclear power plant operation and maintenance.
t Dry active was'te includes contaminated rags, cleaning materials, disposable protective clothing, plastic containers, and any, other i,
material to be disposed of at a low-level. radioactive waste disposal site, except resin, sludge, or evaporator bottoms. Low-level refers to all radioactive waste that is not spent fuel or a by-product -of spent fuel processing.
'This indicator tracks radiological work ' performance for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Item Number 54.
WARElmVSE ISSUES The total number of werehouse issues, the_ number of non-CQE stock. issues, l
the number of CQE
. issues, the number of direct charge non-CQE i; sues, and the numE of direct charge CQE issues which occurred during the reporting month WAREHOUSE RECEIPTS The total number of warehouse receipts, the number of non-CQE stock l
' receipts, the number of CQE stock receipts, the number of direct charge non-CQE. receipts, and the number of direct charge CQE receipts which l-occurred during the reporting month.
WAREHOUSE RETURNS The percentage of the total number of warehouse returns, the number of spare parts returns, the number of standard stores returns, and the number of direct charge returns compared to the total number of warehouse g
issues.
o
-106-u
9 4
BASIS FOR ESTABLISH'.M0 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR GOALS o
.z l
{f.
This section will explain the basis used in establishing the 1990 performance goals.
FORCED OUTAGE RATE AND E001 VALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR 1he Forced Outage Rate (FOR) and Equivalent Availability Factor (EAF) goals have been established from 1990 to 1992. The following table is a if breakdown; of the hours allotted for each category over the next three years.
s STARTUP GENERATOR FORCED OUTAGE
"' ANNED ON LINE OUTAGE TIME OUTAGE PERIOD EAF FOR
,Y1AR (HOURS)
(HOURS)
(HOURS)
(HOURS)
(HOURS)
(%)'
f,!d.
1990(*)
6356 168 172 2064 8760 65.4 2.4 1991(*)
6956 168 172 1464 8760 75.9 2.3 s
1992 8520 240 0
0 8760 92.9 2.7
(*) Refueling Outage Mars l
UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL The 1990 goal for Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scrams While Critical has been set at c7.e. The Fort Calhoun Station has had one unplanned automatic reactor scram in the past four years of operation.
UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS The Unplanned Safety System Actuations goal for 1990 has been established 62 zero. The Fort Calhoun Station did not have an anplanned safety system actuation for six years.
GROSS HEAT RATE 4
The 1990 Gross Heat Rate goal for the Fort Calhoun Station has been set at 10,200 BTV/KWH.-This heat rate goal is based on 10,435 BTV/KWH for the 4
i month of January,- 10,450 BTV/KWH for the month of February, 10,325 BTU /KWH for the month of May, 10,225 BTU /KWH for the month of June, 10,325 BTV/KWH for the month of July, 10,250 BTV/KWH for the month of August, 10,125 BTU /KWH for the month of September, 10,050 BTU /KWH for the i
. month of October, 10,000 BTV/KWH for the month of November, and 9,975 i
BTU /KWH for the month of December.
l
-107-1
BASIS FOR ESTABLISHING 1990 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR GOALS a'
(CONTINVED)
FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR The 1990. Fuel Reliability Indicator (FRI) goal has been set at 1.0 nanocuries/ gram. This level allows for ap)roximately one to two fuel pin failures. Although Cycle 11 was completet without any apparent fuel pin failures, there are a number of Advanced Nuclear Fuels Corporation (ANF) assemblies entering into a third or fourth cycle of o')eration. When a fuel pin has been used for three or four fuel cycles there is an r iled Fuel Action Plan, increased probability of fuel failure. The a
Standing Order 0-43, allows for approximately four fuel pin failures prior to implementing any increased action levels.
PERSONNEL RADIAf10N EXPOSURE (CUMULATIVE)
The 1990 Personnel Radiation Exposure (Cumulative) goal is 287 man-rem.
This goal was based on 234 man rem of cumulative exposure for the 1990
-Refueling Outage and approximately 5.9 man-rem of cumulative exposure for each non-outage month.
VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLID RADIDACTIVE WASTE The 1990 Volume of Low-level Solid Radioactive Waste goal is 5,000 cubic feet. This goal was based on a recommendation made by the Fort Calhoun ALARA Committee and approved by the Division Manager of the Nuclear Production Division.
DISABLING INJURY FRE0VENCY RATE The Disabling injury Frequency Rate 1990 goal has been set at 0.31. This goal allows for one lost time accident in the Nuclear Proouction Division during 1990.
9
-108-
l' I
FORT CALHOUN STATION OPERATINE CYCLES AND REFUEL 1NG OUTAGE DATES PRODUCTION CUMU'.ATIVE TO (MWH)
(AWH)
EVENT FROM Cycle 1 09/26/73 - 02/01/75 3,299,639 3,299,639 First Refueling 02/01/75 - 05/09/75 Cycle 2 05/09/75 - 10/01/76 3,833,322 7,152,961 Second Refueling 10/01/76 - 12/13/76 Cycle 3 12/13/76 - 09/30/77 2,805,927 9,958,888 Third Refueling 09/30/77 - 12/09/77 i
Cycle 4 12/09/77 10/14/78 3,026,832 12,985,720 Fourth Refueling 10/14/78 - 12/24/78 Cycle 5 12/24/78 - 01/18/80 3,882,734 16,868,454 Fifth Refueling 01/18/80 - 06/11/80 Cycle 6 06/11/80 - 09/18/81 3,899,714 20,768,168
[*
Sixth Refueling 09/18/81 - 12/21/81 Cycle 7 12/21/81 - 12/06/82 3,561,866 24,330,034 Seventh Refueling 12/06/82 - 04/07/83 p
Cycle 8 04/07/83 - 03/03/84 3,406,371 27,736,405 l
Eighth Refueling 03/03/84 - 07/12/84 Cycle 9 07/12/84 - 09/28/85 4,741,4r8 32,477,893 Ninth Refueling 09/28/85 - 01/16/86 Cycle 10 01/16/86 - 03/07/87 4,356,753 36,834,646 Tenth Refueling 03/07/l,7 - 06/08/87 Cycle 11 06/08/S7 09/27/88 4,936,859 41,771,505 Eleventh Refueling 09/27/88 - 01/31/89 I
Cycle 12 01/31/89 - 02/17/90 3,817,954 45,589,459 Twelfth Refuelitig 02/17/90 - 05/29/90 i
-109-
)
i 1
y p -
r.
\\,
.n FORT CALHOUH STATION S
OPERATING CYCLES AND REFUELING OUTAGE DATES c
(CONTINUED)
PRODUCTION CUMULATIVE TO (MWH)
(MWH)
EVENT FROM Cycle 13 05/29/90 - 09/28/91*
c.
Thirteenth Refueling 09/28/91*- 11/22/91*
Cycle 14 11/22/91*- 02/12/93*
Fourteenth Refueldng 02/12/93*- 05/06/93*
Cycle 15 05/06/93*- 09/30/94*
Fifte!. nth Refueling 09/30/94*-11/26/94*
- - Planned Dates
-110-
FORT CALHOUN STATION PRODUCTION AND 00ERATION RECORDS The following seven items are the current production and operation
" records" for the Fort Calhoun Station.
- 1. First Sustained Reaction............. August 5, 1973 (5:47 p.m.)
- 2. First Electricity Supplied to the System..... August 25, 1973 3.CommercialOperatien(180,000 KWH)........ September 26, 1973 4.AchievedFullPower(100%)............May4,1974
- 5. Longest Rrn (477 days).............. June 8,1987 - Sept. 27,1988 6.HighestMonthlyNetGeneration(364,468,800 KWH). October 1987 7.MostProductivefuelCycle(4,936,859 MWH).... June 8, 1987 - Sept. 27, 1988 (Cycle 11) e 4
-111-
)
m
n o
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DATA SOURCES PERFORMANCE INDICATOR _
MANAGER /INDIVIDEL Age of Outstanding Maintenance Work Orders Peterson/Schmitz Amount of Work On Hold Awaiting Parts Peterson/ CHAMPS Auxiliary Systems Chemistry Hours Outside Station Limits Franco /Glantz CAR's Current Status Orr/Gurtis CAR's Issued Versus NRC Violations Issued Orr/Gurtis Classroom (Instructor) Hours Gasper /Newhouse Corrective Maintenance Backlog > 3 Months Old Peterson/Schmitz Cumulative Violations and NCV's Chase /Simmons
(
Daily Thermal Output Holtnaus/ Gray 1
Decontaminated Auxiliary Building Peterson/Gundal l
Diesel Generator Reliability DG Log Disabling Injury Frequency Rate Sorenson/Skaggs Document Review Peterson/McKay i
Engineering Assistance Requests Priority Breakdown Jaworski/ Van Osdel Engineering Change Notice Breakdown Phelps/Bera Engineering Change Notice Status Phelps/Bera Equipmer.t Forced Outages per 1000 Critical Hours Holthaus/ Gray Equivalent Availability Factor Dietz/Kulisek L
\\
Expedited Purchases Willrett/Fraser l
Forced 0utage Rate Holthaus/ Gray Fuel Reliability Indicator Holthaus/Lofshult Gaseous Radioactive Waste Discharged to the Environment Franco /Stultz l
Gross Heat Rate Holthaus/ Gray i
Hazardous Waste Produced Peterson/Sayre
-112-
1]
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DATA SOURCE (CONTINUED)
Hotlines Gasper /Newhouse In-Line Chemistry Instruments Out-of-Service Peterson/Renaud Inventory Accuracy Willrett/Fussell Invoice Breakdown Willrett/Fussell t
License Candidate Exams Gasper / Lazar l
Liquid Radioactive Waste Discharged to the Environment Franco /Stultz Loggable/ Reportable Security Incidents Sefick/Woerner Maintenance Effectiveness Jaworski/ Dowdy i
Maintenance Work Order Backlog (Corrective Non-Outage)
Peterson/Schmitz 1
Maintenance Work Order Breakdown Peterson/Schmitz 3
Maintenance Overtime Peterson/Schmitz Material Request Planning Willrett/Fussell Material Requests Awaiting Appruval Willrett/Fraser 1
Maximum Individual Radiation Exposure Peterson/Mattice Number of Hot Spots Peterson/Mattice Number of NPRDS Reportable Failures Jaworski/ Dowdy Number of Out-of-Service Control Room Instruments Peterson/ Adams Number of Personnel Errors Reported in LER's Chase /Simmons Number of Missed ST's Resulting in LER's Plant LER's Operations and Maintenance Budget Gleason/ Parent Outstanding CAR's Orr/Gurtis Outstanding Modifications Jaworski/ Turner Overdue and Extended CAR's Orr/Gurtis PersonnelRadiationExposure(Cumulative)
Peterson/Mattice
-113-
e o
0 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DATA SOURCE (CONTINUED) i Personnel Turnover Rate-Sorenson/ Burke Preventive Maintenance Items Overdue Peterson/ Linden Primary System Chemistry - Percent Hours Out of Limits Franco /Glantz ProceduralNoncomplianceIncidents(Maintenance)
Peterson/McKav j
Radiological Work Practices Program Peterson/Mattice Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance Peterson/Schmitz Recordable Injury Cases Frequency Rate Sorenson/Skaggs R0 License Examination Pass Ratio Gasper / Lazar Secondary System Chemistry Franco /Stultz Security Incident Breakdown Sefick/Woerner Security System failures Sefick/Woerner l
Spare Parts Inventory Value Steele/Huliska Spare Parts Issued Steele/ Miser SR0 License Examination Pass Ratio Gaspar/ Lazar Staffing Level Sorenson/ Burke Stockout Rate Willrett/Fussell Temporary Modifications Jaworski/ Turner Total Hours of Student Training Gasper /Newhouse Total Skin and Clothing Contaminations Peterson/Mattice Unplanned Automatic Ra n Lor Scrams While Critical Holthaus/ Gray Unplanned Safoty System Actuations Holthaus/ Gray Violations per 1000 Inspection Hours Chase /Simmons Volume of Low-level Solid Radioactive Waste Peterson/Breuer Warehouse Issues Willrett/Fussell Warehouse Receipts Willrett/Fussell Warehouse Returns Willrett/Fussell l
-114-
a p
t INP0 Gord Practices OA-102,
Perf or0ance Monitoring Management Information" IEEE-. Standard 762, "IEEE Trial Uti Standard Definitions for Use in Reporting Generating Unit Reliability, Availability and Productivity" INP0 Report Dated November 1984,
- Nuclear Power Plant Operational-Data" f
U.S.' Nuclear Regulatory Comission " Regulatory Guide 1.108 l
e i
i
-115-l l
1