ML20058K757

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to Requesting Addl Calculations of Fuel Densification Gamma Curve Which Provides Calculations Beyond 15,000 Mwd/T Exposure for Figures 4-9C1 & 4-9C2 of GE Topical Rept NEDM-10735,Suppls 6,7 & 8
ML20058K757
Person / Time
Site: Monticello 
Issue date: 11/05/1973
From: Mayer L
NORTHERN STATES POWER CO.
To: Skovholt D
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
References
NUDOCS 9102140360
Download: ML20058K757 (1)


Text

"

i f

NSF NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY MIN N E A PO LI S, MIN N E SOTA 55409 Ragulatory File Cy.

g I>

November 5,1973

.e DocKnTD s

9 y'f' e % ',,/

ggyzg

~\\

kkb b

NOV7 1973 * *

/

Mr. D J Skovholt b

1 f _;

M U$IjkY, ()

s g T 1973 D' Assistant Director for Operating Reactors 03 DOCKET CLEKKs pg gi y

Directorate of Licensing cy xn A

Office of Regulation 4

d' g-Q U S Atomic Energy Commission

\\

iv/

Washington, D C 20545

Dear Mr. Skovholt:

MOSTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PlAIU Docket No. 50-263 License No. DPR-22 Additional Calculations of the Fuel Densification Gamma Curve Your October 26, 1973 letter requested that we provide calculations beyond 15,000 5'D/T exposure for Figures 4-9C1 and 4-9C2 of General Electric Topical Report NEDM-10735, supplemento 6, 7, and 8.

Calculations were initially done for segment exposures of 15,000 m'D/T and extrapolated to higher exposures. Canfirmatory calculations were recently done for segment exposures of 25,000 m'D/T. The MAPLHGR for gamma curve conditions of initial core fuel is calculated at,25,000 E'D/T segment expo-sure to be 11.5 kw/ft as shown in Figure 4-9C2.

For the 20 Monticello Generic B Reload I assemblies considered in Figure 4-9C1, the MAPLHGR gamma curve decreased from 11.5 kw/f t at 15,000 MWD /T to 11.4 kv/f t at 25,000 MWD /T segment exposure.

'Ihere is no change in either curve in question prior to 15,000 MWD /T.

We do not expect any fuel segment to reach that exposure during cycle 2 which terminates in the spring of 1974. The Reload 1 fuel will have significantly less exposure in the peak segment at that time.

We understand that General Electric has transmitted answers on this subject along with replacement figures in a November 2,1973, letter from Mr. IF Stuart to Mr. V A Moore.

Please reference this information in our docket.

Yours very truly, 6.

L 0 Mayer, PE Director of Nuclear Support Services 9102140360 731105 8083 cc: J G Keppler CF ADDCK 05000263 G Charnoff CF Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Attn. K Dzugan