ML20058J578

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Discusses 931020 Mgt Meeting in Atlanta,Ga Re Nuclear Assessment Dept (NAD)-related Issues.List of Attendees & Slides Used Encl
ML20058J578
Person / Time
Site: Brunswick  
Issue date: 10/31/1993
From: Merschoff E
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To: Richard Anderson
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO.
References
NUDOCS 9312140162
Download: ML20058J578 (32)
v • d • e


Text

--

CCT 31 1993 l

Docket Nos.:

50-325, 50-324 License Nos.: DPR-71, DPR-62 Carolina Power and Light Company ATTN: Mr. R. A. Anderson Vice President Brunswick-Steam Electric Plant

[

P. O. Box 10429 Southport, NC 28461 4

Gentlemen:

SUBJECT:

MEETING

SUMMARY

- BRUNSWICK l

This refers to the management meeting conducted in the Region II Office on l

October 20, 1993. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss Nuclear Assessment Department (NAD)-related issues.

A list of attendees, and a copy of your slides are enclosed.

It is our opinion that this meeting was beneficial in that it provided a better understanding of NAD's strengths and challenges, as well as actions taken/ planned with regard to strengthening assessment planning and issue closure. - Of particular interest were the r

results of NAD's assessments of Unit I restart readiness and CP&L's Quality Check Program, j

In accordance with Secti9n 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a. copy of this letter an:1 its enclosures will be placed in the NRC public document room.

Should you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact us.

Sincerely

.i I

.M Ellis W. Merschoff, Director Division of Reactor Projects

'l Enclosures-1.

list of Attendees i

2.

Licensee Slides I

i cc w/encls:

(See page 2)

.j f

9 I

a 9312140162 931031 I

hDR ADOCK 05000324-PDR MhI

CCT 31 1933 Carolina Power and Light Company 2

cc w/encls:

i H. W. Habermeyer, Jr.

Public Service Commission Vice President State of South Carolina i

Nuclear Services Department P. O. Box 11649 Carolina Power & Light Company Columbia, SC 29211 P. O. Box 1551

- Mail OHS 7 i

Raleigh, NC 27602 J. P. Cowan Plant Manager Unit 1 Brunswick Steam Electric Plant P. D. Box 10429 Southport, NC 28461 C. C. Warren Plant Manager Unit 2 Brunswick Steam Electric Plant P. O. Box 10429 Southport, NC 28461 Mark S. Calvert Associate General Counsel i

Carolina Power and Light Company P. O. Box 1551 i

Raleigh, NC 27602 j

Kelly Holden, Chairman Board of Commissioners P. O. Box 249 j.

Bolivia, NC 28422 Dayne H. Brown, Director L

Division of Radiation Protection N. C. Department of Environment,

~!

Commerce & Natural Resources l

P. O. Box 27687 i

Raleigh, NC 27611-76B7 l

Karen E. Long l

Assistant Attorney General State of North Carolina P. O. Box 629 Raleigh, NC 27602 Robert P. Gruber Executive Director Public Staff - NCUC i

P.. O. Box 29520 Raleigh, NC 27626-0520 I

bcc w/encls:

(See page 3) l i

{

]

7 -.-

Carolina Power and Light Company 3

CCT 3 i t993 bcc w/encls:

t Document Control Desk H. Christensen, RIl P. Milano, NRR NRC Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Star Route 1, Box 208 Southport, NC 28461 i

f t

i i

i Rll -

RJ I;>DRP RII DRP L c]

(~)&

R r.

1:tj BHaap/93 HC stensen 10/t 10

/93 10/3/93 l

i l

r

I' j

4 I

i i

ENCLOSURE I LIST OF ATTENDEES l

Carolina Power and Liaht Company R. A. Anderson, Vice President, Brunswick Nuclear Plant L. I. Lofliri, Manager, Nuclear Assessment Department (NAD)

M. D. Bradit:y, Manager, Brunswick Project Assessment, NAD l

J. P. Cowan, Plant Manager, Unit 1 l

W. Levis, flanager, Regulatory Affairs R. E. Rogan, Manager, Nuclear Licensing.

{

Nuclear regulatory Commission i

L. A. Reyes, Deputy Regional Administrator, Region II (RII)

E. W. Merschtff, Director, Division of Reactor Projects (DRP), RII i

A. F. Gibson, Director, Division of Reactor Safety (DRS), RII

11. O. Christensen, Acting Chief, Reactor Projects Branch 1, DRP, RII l

C. A. Julian, Chief, Engineering Branch, DRS, RII l

P. D. Milano, Project Manager, Office of Nuclear Reactor Isegulation W. T. Orders, Senior Resident, Reactor Projects Section IA, DRP, RII R. E. Carroll, Project Engineer, Reactor Projects Section IA, DRP, RII l

1 I

ENCLOSURE 2 k

J CP&L PRESENTATION NRC/CP&L INTERACTION MEETING ASSESSMENTS 9

afUi BRUNSWICK-NUCLEAR PLANT Atlanta, Georgia October 20,1993 i

l

L 1

AGENDA ai i

Introduction R. A. Anderson i

Development of Self-Assessment W. Levis Plant AssessmentsNalue Added J.Cowan NAD Overview L.1. Loflin Summary R. A. Anderson i

l 2

i 4-

L i

INTRODUCTION l

CP&L is Committed To Continual improvement At i

i Brunswick Effective Self-Assessment is A Key Factor in Improvement Ensures Things Are Done Right Finds Better Ways Of Doing Things Achieves Higher Standards Of Quality And Performance 3

e h

e.-

__----.-e,

,----.~,.-.~n n~

---~,--->,n..

<--v~--

1 b

I 2

SELF ASSESSMENT PROCESS DEVELOPMENT

,l l

lJAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG' SEP OCT'NOV DEC!

i

_____ _ _j _..,

i

$ issue PN Dec ' 2 i

$ issue PN Jan '93 I

i l

i l

$ Issue Unit 2 Startup & Power jscension Plan - Feb '93 l

i l

i i

$ Revise Al-101 Feb '93 l

l

$ issue PL,P-25 May '93 i

i l

$ Revise PN-31 (Unit 1) - Jul '93 i l

1 lIssue Unit 1 Startup & Power l, i

i i

I

' Ascension Pla,n - Jul '93 i

i I

l l

$ Revise Al-114 Jul'93 l

i i

t t

k J

i DEVELOPMENT OF SELF-ASSESSMENT 1

PN-30, " INTEGRATED RECOVERY METHODOLOGY"

- Established the methodology for the recovery of BNP Units 1 and 2.

- includes identification, completion, categorization, integration, scheduling control, and completion of open items.

5 b

s 4d.e,-eem

+

.ey e,-

.aw+---g..+-*+-+,.-_,-ysn'w w

y-+-

e

  • - - +

m

.e

u. m-

-,,__4.-

--a--

-.4

- s

__,_._,___.___,.m___

m

A l

DEVELOPMENT OF SELF-ASSESSMENT PN-31, "LINE MANAG$ MENT SELF-ASSESSMENT OF READINESS FOR RESTART OF BNP UNIT 2"

- Developed and documented information to support a determination that Unit 2 was ready to safely and reliably restart.

- Scope:

People

  • Plant Process

- Personal Accountability

~

k i

J DEVELOPMENT OF SELF-ASSESSMENT i

STARTUP & POWER ASCENSION TEST PLAN

- 4 Assessment Hold Points

- 3 Decision Hold Points

- Reinforced PN-31, Philosophy 7

~

x 2

DEVELOPMENT OF SELF-ASSESSMENT s

t PLP-25, "SELF-ASSESSMENT":

- Built on Previous Success

- 3 Year Plan item l

l

- Specific Unit Plans Strengths Weaknesses Follow-up Review 8

i

~.

L J

LEVELS OF SELF-ASSESSMENT TODAY ANNUAL PLAN SELF-ASSESSMENTS

- PLP-25 SELF-ASSESSMENTS AND OBSERVATIONS

- Al-101, Management Surveillance Watch Program

- Al-114, Management Responsibilities for Housekeeping INPO ASSIST VISITS l

OTHER

- Management Review

- -Unit 2 Performance Reviews

- Manager on Shift

- STAR i

9

e -

a w

__m a,

.s.w_

a a

a,.

sm

.a ma a.a.

em.-

m_.

.2

_in-L.

-1m.L a

s 4

3 4,4, 3

FUTURE PLANS DATA EVALUATION ORGANIZATIONAL BOUNDARIES l

GOOD PRACTICE INFORMATION 10 k - -..__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.-.. _ _. _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____ _ _ _ ___ ____--... _ _..._._,_ _________ _ _ _ _____ __ ___

J i

t l.

MANAGEMENT SORVEILLANCE WATCH l

c l

I l

OBJECTIVES:

I

- Identify barriers to achievement of excellence from the management perspective.

i l

- Ensure that:

field personnel obtain management support management expectations are communicated procedures are meeting expectations

[

IMPLEMENTED FOR UNIT 2 STARTUP AND

.i CONTINUES TODAY.

11 e

m

. m m

m c.

~~

BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PLANT NAD INDICATOR 1992-1993 t

CURRENT STATUS 140 19 sues Opened (new) 6 120 issues Closed by Plant 1

Issues Oosed by NAD 0

- y-m 100 g

f issues Pendng a

Rant Oosu'*

2 80

--VI

< 4 mos 6 O

> 4 mos 9 C

> 8 mos 2 9

60 s

ds

+

> 12 mos 2 Isgues Pendng Cmective

-- g, - -

40 Action Confirms: ion by NAD

/

/

-;y

j;

'K<

< 4 mos 0

20 v-

> 4 mos 5

1 1

>8mos 11

> 12 mos 23 0

SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP IDENTIFIED 83 85 86 87 90 94 95 98 99 107 107 109 115 CLOSED BY PLANT

{F 19 20 23 36 39 49 49 62 73 80 87 95 96 CONFIRMED BY NAD n 8

9 9

16 18 19 20 20 36 44 56 57 57 current as of 10/08/93 Monthly figures are cummutative running totals

k A

MANAGEMENT ON-SHIFT OBJECTIVE:

- To communicate expected standards and provide direct coaching of personnel for an extended period of time.

IMPLEMENTED SEPTEMBER 1993

- Line Managers Assigned for Week Maintenance, Operations, Outage, Tech Support, E&RC, Training, Work Control

- Involvement with Specific Activities within the Protected Areas 12

~ -

~

L 2

Il STAR 1

I i

i STOP - THINK - ACT - REVIEW 1

OBJECTIVE:

- Began implementation May 1993 to establish the self-assessment work practice as a way of life at Brunswick SCOPE:

l

- All aspects of plant operations l

t RESULTS:.

- Numerous examples of questioning attitude revealing areas for improvement 13

~ ~ -,. - - ~..

~. - - -

,---.s-m-

-e

l L

A l

EXAMPLES OF COMPLETED ASSESSMENTS L

1 l

l i

i TECHNICAL SUPPORT OPERATIONS WORK MANAGEMENT f

6 e

t I4 i

t 4

i PURPOSE TODAY t-NAD STRENGTHS NAD CHALLENGES UNIT 1 RESTART ASSESSMENT i

QUALITY CHECK PROGRAM 17 I

I

A A

NAD STRENGTHS l

l 1.

EXPERIENCED CAPABLE ASSESSORS

- 33 with technical degrees

- 70% recent line experience

- 19 year average nuc! car experience

- 16 Senior Reacter Operators PERFORMANCE BASEp

- Located at each plant

- Daily and back shift observations

- Discipline aligned (i.e., Operations, Maintenance, Engineering)

USE OF EXTERNAL SUBJECT EXPERTS

- CP&L Peers

- Non-CP&L Individuals

k NAD CHALLENGES d

ISSUE CLOSURE

- Plant corrective action

- NAD followup i

PLANNING OF ASSESSMENTS

- Content j

- Schedule P

i 19

W Y

~

CHANGES TO STRENGTHEN ISSUE CLOSURE 1

P l

30 DAY PLANT RESPONSE TO NAD ISSUES NAD EVALUATION OF PLANT RESPONSE MONTHLY SENIOR MANAGEMENT OPEN ISSUE STATUS LETTER MONTHLY MANAGEMENT REVIEW OF NAD ISSUES l

FOLLOW-UP AND CLOSURE OF ALL ISSUES AND WEAKNESSES 4

2o l.

k E

I ASSESSMENT PLANNING

~

d IMPROVE CONTENT Move ahead of industry issues Better use of Operating Experience feedback i

Target areas of weak Self-Assessment IMPROVE SCHEDULING 28 assessments at BNP in 10 months of 1993 Tech Spec driven Performance driven Revised Tech Specs t

Movement of assessors among plants' Better integrated scheduling Better assigned coverage 25 7-

---m.

a b-w

--+t-eaw N

ee=+

+-e-=+m--

eure W,p vr"--4+-

w ra

+

iten

,w-vy-.

g,-owem-w

=cee r"-

+T*-.

e+

mae r

+Mwg g-am

=

c-ee m

i a.

c-y e-

= -....-

L 2

STARTUP ASSESSMENTS 1

1 UNIT 2

- Startup Readiness Assessment - conducted February 1993, identified three issues for resolution prior to Unit 2 Startup Management involvement in evolution preparation and event i

follow-up Work scheduling and coordination

' Outage work scope and sequence 1

i l

l 1

22 l

l l

m

.~r e

-m.-.

,..ew

..~e- -..

3

~

L 2

STARTUP ASSESSMENTS t

I k

i UNIT 1 j

- Startup Readiness Assessment - conducted August 1993, identified one issue for resolution prior to Unit 1 Startup Management of Refuel Floor activities I

I i

l 23

- - -. ~

A UNIT 1 RESTART TEAM t

TEAM

- 19 members,5 non-CP&L

- 7 on Unit 2 Restart Team

- 10 SRO's,1 STA COVERAGE AREAS

- Operations

- Maintenance

- Engineering / Technical Support

- Management

- E&RC

- Startup Organization and Plan

A

~

REMAINING UNIT 1 RESTART ASSESSMENT ACTIVITIES l

l PHASE 11 OF STARTUP READINESS ASSESSMENT

- Follow up Previous Restart Assessments

- Follow up Assumptions Made in Restart Assessment

- Resolution of any Emergent issues

- Material Walkdown

- Shift Coverage (1-2 weeks before Rod Pull)

- Provide Independent Assessment of Readiness for Startup SHIFT COVERAGE OF STARTUP AND POWER ASCENSION TO 100 %

- Independent Assessment of Startup Activities 25 i

J

F.j QUALITY CHECK PROGRAM i

BEGAN 1984 AT HARRIS, EXPAND TJ TO BRUNSWICK AND ROBINSON IN 1987 HANDLES APPROXIMATELY 100 ITEMS PER YEAR REQUIRING RESPONSE

- Sources:

Drop boxes l

Walk in/ Phone in Exit interviews Continuing interviews 25

j h

3 CURRENT REVIEW OF QUALITY CHECK OBJECTIVES

- Gauge the environment within CP&L to raising safety concerns

- Gauge the condition of the quality check program PROCESS

- 80 interviews at 4 locations Complete

- Data Summary Complete

- Validation of primary themes Nov.12

^

- Program attribute review Oct. 25

- Recommended Actions Dec.1 27 6

.--,,,-,.,rar,we,

-.. +. -.,, -

we--.m%.i--mi-..

--we-=++*

w-e -. - ~, =,

i W

RESULTS TO DATE

.I PERCEPTION OF OVERALL NUCLEAR SAFETY CULTURE HAS IMPROVED SUBSTANTIALLY OVER THE LAST YEAR, ESPECIALLY AT BNP HOWEVER, THERE IS STILL A SEGMENT OF THE POPULATION THAT FEELS IMPROVEMENT IS NEEDED IMPROVEMENTS TO THE QUALITY CHECK PROGRAM HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED 28

i E

l',

SUMMARY

CP&L IS TAKING AGGRESSIVE ACTIONS TO RESOLVE RECOGNIZED WEAKNESSES IN SELF-ASSESSMENT AT BRUNSWICK AND WITHIN THE COMPANY

- We can identify our problems and solve them.

EXPECTATIONS REGARDING SAP TY, RELIABILITY, AND COST ARE BEING TRACKED AS PERFORMANCE GOALS AND COMMUNICATED TO EMPLOYEES KEY TO FUTURE SUCCESS 29

=

se

,y3

_

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20058J578&oldid=4471700"