Text

Discusses Mgt Meeting Conducted on 931202 at Facility Re Progress in Addressing Current Issues & Status of Activities Re Resolving Restart Issues in Insp Repts 50-498/93-31.List of Attendees & Viewgraphs Encl
	ML20058J538
Person / Time
Site:	South Texas
Issue date:	12/08/1993
From:	Beach A; NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:	Cottle W; HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER CO.
References
	NUDOCS 9312140147
	Download: ML20058J538 (54)
	v • d • e

> - 8' ' '; v UNIT E D ST ATES

f ,1 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

. j

$

i

l'/ 2[ ^8

REGION IV

611 RYAN PLAZA DmVE, SUITE 400

"4 y [ ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011-8064

""* DEC - 81993

Dockets: 50-498

50-499

Licenses: NPF-76

NPF-80

Houston Lighting & Power Company

ATTN: William T. Cottle, Group

Vice President, Nuclear

P.O. Box 289

Wadsworth, Texas 77483

SUBJECT: DECEMBER 2, 1993, MANAGEMENT MEETING

This refers to the meeting conducted at the NRC's request at the South Texas

Project site on December 2, 1993. This meeting reinted to your progress in

addressing current issues and the status of your activities with respect to

resolving the Restart Issues identified in NRC Inspection Report 50-498/93-31;

50-498/93-31. The meeting was open to the public and was attended by those on

the attached Attendance List.

In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2,

Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter will be placed in

the NRC's Public Document Room.

Should you have any questions concerning this matter, we will be pleased to

discuss them with you.

Sincerely,

[

t.

f '\

'A. ill Beach, Direct r

Division of Reactor Projects

Enclosure:

Meeting Summary w/ attachments

cc w/ enclosure:

Houston Lighting & Power Company

ATTN: James J. Sheppard, General Manager

Nuclear Licensing

P.O. Box 289

Wadsworth, Texas 77483

9312140147 931200 8

PDR ADOCK 0500

G

.

Houston Lighting & Power Company -2-

City of Austin

Electric Utility Department

ATTN: J. C. Lanier/M. B. Lee

721 Barton Springs Road

Austin, Texas 78704

City Public Service Board

ATTN: K. J. Fiedler/M. T. Hardt

P.O. Box 1771

San Antonio, Texas 78296

Newman & Holtzinger, P. C.

ATIN: Jack R. Newman, Esq.

1615 L Street, NW

Washington, D.C. 20036

Central Power and Light Company

ATTN: G. E. Vaughn/T. M. Puckett

P.O. Box 2121

Corpus Christi, Texas 78403

INP0

Records Center

700 Galleria Parkway

Atlanta, Georgia 30339-5957

Mr. Joseph M. Hendrie

,

50 Bellport Lane

Bellport, New York 11713

.

Bureau of Radiation Control

State of Texas

1100 West 49th Street

Austin, Texas 78756

Judge, Matagorda County

Matagorda County Courthouse

1706 Seventh Street

Bay City, Texas 77414

Licensing Representative

Houston Lighting & Power Company

Suite 610

Three Metro Center

Bethesda, Maryland 20814

., -- -. . . - . .- . . - . . ~ . . . _ . .- . . .. -

>

.

'

i

. !

Houston Lighting & Power Company -3- !

!

,

Houston Lighting & Power Company ,

ATTN: Rufus S. Scott, Associate .i'

General Counsel

P.O. Box 61867 i

Houston, Texas 77208 .

!

I

i

.

,

i

>

h

t

l

I

l

I

!

>

i

>

r

h

!

t

!

,

!

,

i

,

4

f

l

.-. .

!

-. ._ .

.- -

,

..

- ,

Houston Lighting & Power Company -4- g[g gjg

,

bcc to DMB (IE01)

bcc distrib. by RIV: l

J. L. Milhoan Resident Inspector

Section Chief (DRP/A) Lisa Shea, RM/ALF, MS: MNBB 4503

MIS System DRSS-FIPS

RIV File Project Engineer (DRP/A)

R. Bachmann, OGC, MS: 15-B-18 Section Chief (DRP/TSS)

DRS/STP ,

!

,

l

,

1

sh n n

RIV:PE:DRP/ C:DRPfA DTDRP,,,Qb

MASatorius:ww WDJohnson -ABlfd[h

12/O/93 12/1 /93 I 12' k/93 k ,

o

.

Houston Lighting & Power Company -4- DEC - 8 IE

bcc to DMB (IE01)

bcc distrib. by RIV:

J. L. Milhoan Resident Inspector

Section Chief (DRP/A) Lisa Shea, RM/ALF, MS: HNBB 4503

MIS System DRSS-FIPS

RIV File Project Engineer (DRP/A)

R. Bachmann, OGC, MS: 15-B-18 Section Chief (DRP/TSS)

DRS/STP

130 i

is) n. -

e

RIV:PE:DRP/ C:DRPfA DEDQ,,Qb

MASatorius:w WDJohnson ABdkh[hW

12/O/93 12/1 /93 ( }Z'/$3/93\

l

- - - - - - - _ _ _ - - - _ _ _ - _ _ _ - . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _

.- ~ . - .

. . . . . .. ..

- I

.

MEETING SUMMARY

!

Licensee: Houston Lighting & Power Company

Facility: South Texas Project ;

Licenses: NPF-76; NPF-80 l

Dockets: 50-498; 50-499 !

1

Subject: MANAGEMENT MEETING

] !

Topics discussed included the licensee's operational readiness status (restart

issues, performance indicators, line management assessment, and-system ,

f

certification), engineering issues, independent assessment, and startup

schedule.

Attachments:

1. Attendance List ;

2. Licensee Presentation (NRC distribution only) t

3

f

i

a

r

4

'

E

1

e

i

!

>

!

l,-

-

i

r

e

f

i

!

t

. .: -.

'

. _ _ _

~

!

+

.

ATTENDANCE LIST Attachment 1

Attendance at the management meeting between unuston Lighting & Power Company

and NRC on December 2, 1993, at the South Texas Proj=ct site:

HL&P

1

W. Cottle, Group Vice President, Nuclear ,

J. Groth, Vice President, Nuclear Generation

J. Sheppard, General Manager, Licensing

T. Cloninger, Vice President, Nuclear Engineering

L. Myers, Plant Manager, Unit 1

L. Martin, General Manager, Nuclear Assurance

H. Butterworth, Manager, Unit 1 Operations

CITY PUBLIC SERVICE - SAN ANTONIO

M. Hardt, Director, Nuclear Division

PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS

C. Oberg, Nuclear Projects

NRC ,

4

'

S. Collins, Director, Division of Reactor Safety (DRS)

S. Black, Director, Project Directorate IV-2, Office of Nuclear Reactor ;

Regulation (NRR) -

" A. Howell, Deputy Director, DRS

D. Loveless, Senior Resident Inspector, Division of Reactor Project

Section A (DRP/A)

M. Satorius, Project Engineer, DRP/A

L. Kokajko, Senior Project Manager, Project Directorate IV-2, NRR

T. McKernon, Reactor Inspector, Operations Section, DRS l

J. Keeton, Resident Inspector '

D. Garcia, Resident Inspector, DRP/A

J. Gilliland, Public Affairs Officer !

C. Hackney, State Liaison Office

S. Wittenberg, Intern, Project Directorate IV-2, NRR ;

l

In addition to the above, license staff members, contractors, members of the'

public, and media representation were in attendance.

i

t

i

'

I

!

'

!

- -

__,__m __m. . . _ _ . . . _ _ _ _ . . . . _

. _ . _ __ _ _.. _ _ _ _ _

'

' '

Attachment 2

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT

-

.

._ .

.

HL&P and NRC Management Meeting

December 2,1993

__ -

VISION: STP -- A WORLD-CLASS POWER PRODUCER

._-____ - ____ __- __ _ -- _-______ - _ _--_--___ _ __ _ -_ _ __ _ _ _

. _

- - -

, .

.

,.

,

AGENDA

OPENING REMAR'KS W.T.COTTLE

OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE J. F. GROTH

.

ENGINEERING T. H. CLONINGER

OPERATIONAL READINESS STATUS J. F. GROTH/

-

T. H. CLONINGER

INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM L. E. MARTIN /

W.T.COTTLE

STARTUP SCHEDULE J. F. GROTH

'

NUCLEAR SAFETY AND QUALITY CONCERNS PROGRAM W.T.COTTLE

CLOSING REMARKS W.T.COTTLE

r - .- __ < _ - - , _ . . . . . . _ ~

-

. ~ . . . . - . , - - _ , , , . , , , , , . _ . , , , . . , _ - . -, . . . . . - _ ~ . . _ - - . . _ .

-

m._aAJa _4 y 4 .,.s.h. u u .*.4 .W4_. .--.Em.42.- +' h 44 A.- F -54-a e- p4 .a 6Ja- 4 - --1 Ja,

- #

.*I

4

h

!

3

i

. 4 i

4

.)

.

I

. !

'

b

!

a

!

I

y

i

!

-f

f

r

!

' ,

N ,

!

a

5

4

s

L

F

5

m

Ch ,

2 l

cd :

< .

. 2 i

.

m :

,

L O ,

i, Z

-

,

'

4

m :

1 4 i

O i

f

.

-I

4

I

.

1

!

i

,

I

, i

p

r

. e

i

!

'l

.

. .

t

i

I

i,

P

,

I

'

, ,

, I' l

,

e

. -

4

' e i

!

, _ ~ . - . ... . _ ._ _ . _

i.. m. m. ,_. . . 2m... _. a _ ,, .,_ = , . ,,

. !

i

.:

I

!

t

7

~

!

o

,e

i

I

,

.I

!

I

L

!

>

I

i

P

)

+

g

.

Z :

.

<

g ;

W

. i

.

Z

-

a

!

<

- i

i

..;

b !

Z !

< i

@ k

Z !

O

-

f

-

H

!

m ,

c I

O .;

i

.t

f

(

-h

i

$

t

f

:',

f

a f

i

.j

t

>

. i

!

- a

k

- p

e

"

-I

,,__. , , .. . .. .. . - _ _ . _. .

-. - , -.. -. t

. .

, , _

-' -- *

,

UNIT 1

PREVENTIVE & COIGECTIVE MAINTENANCE

SERVICE REQUESTS

.

3,000

2,750

2,500

.*

...

=

,

2,250 *

.

,

.

e

2,000 .

"

.

............................ ,,,,,,,,,, .,,, ,

,

.

1,750

'"**. ....,.. *. ....

.

.. g .*...................... ..,,,

i

-

.

1'250

.

.,.....**.....a*

, .

1,000 .

"

4 .

"

, ..

j 750

4

I

i

1 .

i 250 ..**

0

U SMM UMMUS M

( 08-01 08-08 08-15 08-22 08-29 09-05 09-12 09-19 09-26 10-03 10-10 10-17 10-24 10-31 11-07 11-14 11-21 11-28 12-05 12-12 12-19 12-26

,

NEWSR'S OPEN SR'S CUMULATIVE NEW CUMULATIVE COMPLETE

! m ............. .............

KAS*LDNW13*RM1

4

1

..m__ __m___._m. _ _ _ .-___...m.._ ._--_-____.m______m.mm__.-.___._ _m__..-m___m--_-_m-___ _____m___-____-1------wew-m-m- - . -

t-- - - - -r r- * - - ' - =-w<-w--* --- wc+-wie*,v'*

, ,

,

, ..

SERVICE REOUEST BACKLOG MANAGEMENT

OVERALL TREND SHOWS MANAGEMENT PLAN IS ON TRACK

RECENT FLATTENING OF TREND IS DUE TO:

SYSTEM WALKDOWNS

ONE TIME EVENTS HAVE TEMPORARILY INCREASED THE SR

GENERATION RATE

WORK-OFF RATE HAS STAYED RELATIVELY CONSTANT

BACKLOG GOAL ACHIEVABLE

,

l

. . . . . . _ . . . . - . - _ .-_.., . _ _ . _ . , _ ,_ _ . _ --

_ . _ . - _ . . . . - _ _ - _ . . . -

_ _ . _ . . , , , . - . . - . . - - . _ . , . . , ..-- .. _ ,_,-._...., --. ._. .,..,.~_.-. . _ .-..-.- . .,.-.._...._

- - . _ -

-.-- . - - - - . - . - - . . - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ . _ _ _ - _ _ _ . . _ .

.

. ..

- .

l

4 CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS

OUT-OF-SERVICE

UNIT 1 -- MONTHLY

100 -

GOALS

'

MODE 4 11

90 - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - -

MODE 3 8

-

MODE 1 7

l 100% POWER 0

Lu 80 - - - - - - - -

0 .

'

70 - -- - - - - - -

- - - - - -- - --- -- -

@

-

.

'

W -

i

o 60 - - - - - - - --- - - -- -- -- - - -- ---

\ @ -

^

O 50 -

- -

- - - - --- - - - - -

l w _

.

k 40 - - -- - - - - - - - - - - --

,

g -

t

g 30 - -- ----- - ----

-

to ,

Z

20 - - - -

10 - - --

0 ; , ., , , ; ; ; ; i , ,

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

I ,__

1993

__ . - . _ -. _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

.

.- ,

,,

- -

CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS

OUT OF SERVICE NUMBERS ARE ARTIFICIALLY INFLUENCED BY

ONGOING MAINTENANCE AND PLANT CONDITIONS

LARGE NUMBER OF DEFICIENCIES WILL BE CLEARED BY MODE

CHANGES

GOAL IS ACHIEVABLE TO SUPPORT MODE CHANGES AND RETURN TO

OPERATIONS

1

L

-e'a--_,,+ - , . . i-==.r3e . ,ww er . .-c'**'*

v v er e-- n -e w - sre- e -ss'e -mm- -imv.eiw m -w ar --:--e-=.- -- is -s-we~~-+-, 4-s,-- ~ , - =%-- a wwc'e- n.m .. . . - - .mm--%-, w- =w- - -e - -e-- , ~ = - - - - = . - = * s *vw-wa * - - *<*e-:-

.. .. .

. .

CONTROL AND MANAGEMENT OF CONTRACT PERSONNEL

CONTRACT VALVE CREW ON UNIT 2 WAS FOUND WORKING ON WRONG

VALVES

INVESTIGATION REVEALED

CREW IGNORED MULTIPLE INDICATIONS THAT THEY WERE IN THE

WRONG PLACE

NO ISSUES IDENTIFIED WITH WORK PACKAGE, LABELING, OR

ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS

ROOT CAUSE HUMAN ERROR

LACK OF SUFFICIENT IN-FIELD SUPERVISION

ACTIONS UNDERWAY

APPROPRIATE DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS TAKEN

SPECIFIC SUPERVISORY EXPECTATIONS FOR CONTRACT VENDOR

BEING STRENGTHENED AND EMPHASIZED

OTHER CONTRACT VENDOR CONTRACTS AND TASKS BEING

REVIEWED .

. . - .

_ . - .- .. - - - . _ . .

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -_ _- ._ _ - . -. - -__ -

* *

., e

,

OPEN STATION PROBLEM RFPO T S

Categories 1 to 5 11/26/93 POD

l 1000

Common Units d A_,

900_. j _.

n

'- / =>

' v~ / L ,_ c ,

800 fv-- ~

'

_ - '

700-- -

-

-v' -

t _

600-1 Both Units

'

500- ~

400--

Unit 2

300- --

200--

Unit 1

-

100- - .

'L'L ' ' . J '

-

x

0ie iie iiii iiiiiiiiii iiiii iiiiii 'r

Jan-93 Feb-93 Mar-93 Apr-93 May-93 Jun-93 Jul-93 Sep-93 Oct-93 Nov-93

. _ - . .. .-. . . . - . . . . . . .. ___ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _

-

.. .. ..

STATION PROBLEM REPORTS

,

RECOGNIZED BY MANAGEMENT AS A CHALLENGE

NSRB, NUCLEAR ASSURANCE, ISEG, AND OROT ALSO IDENTIFIED SPR

PROCESS AS ISSUE REQUIRING ACTION

BACKLOG CHARACTERI7mED AND UNDERSTOOD

OUTSTANDING SPRs SCREENED FOR POTENTIAL TO AFFECT

SAFETY / RELIABILITY OF SAFETY SYSTEMS

SPRs SCREENED FOR MODE CHANGE RESTRAINTS

SYSTEM CERTIFICATION AND QA ASSESSMENTS HAVE PROVIDED

ADDITIONAL SCREENS

SCREENING PROCESSES HAVE ASSURED THAT NO CURRENT ISSUE IS

HIDDEN

- _ _ _ . . _ . _ _ -

_ - . _ - _ . . . _ . _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ . _ . . _ _ . . _ . . _

- -

., ..

STATION PROBLEM REPORTS (Cont.)

ACTIONS TO ASSURE EMERGING ISSUES ARE ADEQUATELY IDENTIFIED

AND ADDRESSED

NEW SPRs REVIEWED BY DEPARTMENT LEVEL MANAGERS AT DAILY

MEET]NG

NEW SPRs ARE BEING DISPOSITIONED MORE RAPIDLY

SIGNIFICANT ITEMS ARE WORKED AS THEY COME IN

INITIATION RATE CONTINUES TO SHOW WILLINGNESS OF STATION

PERSONNEL TO REPORT PROBLEMS

PROBLEM REVIEW GROUP ENSURES PROBLEM CLEARLY

ARTICULATED AND ADDRESSED AT PLANT MANAGER LEVEL

. - - _ _ - .- . .. . .

.

_

-

_

- _

_

.

S

,

_

T _

R

O _

P _

E _

R

Y

L _

H

T

N

.

_

O .

-

M T

_

.

DN _

NE _

AM _

.

E

Y

L G _

KA _.

EN -

EA _

.

) .

WM P _

t ,O I

_

n DT H

o O S T _

C

(

G P S R N

.

_

O T E E P

S L YR N U :_

T K LO W M O _

R C

I

A E P V R -

O A O L G _

P B DR E O :.

E V W

_

R E

-

L N

YA I

N E

M

C

T B-

L I I _

U G Y V

LR

I

E D E

L I E N R R

B E BV I

O

.

R I

C S

O S

Y R I M

R. O I

O V E

P T VL R L

K F

E B

_

N S HE N P O

.

O N GE I

E U R

-

_

I

O I

HW R

T I S P _

A T _

.

T C

.

S A .

_

.

,

_

.

_

- -

.. ..

UNIT 1 REFUELING

CORE RELOAD SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED ON 11/21/93 -

MODE 5 ENTERED ON 11/25/93

STRENGTHS:

GOOD CONTROL OF ACTIVITIES BY OPERATIONS

REFUELING MACHINERY PERFORMED WELL

CONTRACTOR PERFORMED WELL

LESSONS LEARNED:

START SELF-ASSESSMENTS EARLIER

DOCUMENT AS-LEFT CONDITION OF REFUELING MACHINE

SIGNIFICANT-MILESTONE ACHIEVED

.._ __ _ _ _

_.-

--

_ . . _ _ _ . . _ . . . _ _ . _ _ _ _ . - _ _ . _ . . . . _ . _ . _ . . _ . ...

.. . . _ _ - _ -. 4 .... . _ . .. .. . . , _ . . __ . . - ,

. . ,

'

e

.

i

6

o

b

,6

!

t

-

I

r

6

>

..

,.

.

I

t

'

)

i

b

t

n

!

b

!

i

!

u

.

t

0 i

Z

-

!

w t

[.0 4

>

'6

-

O

t

.

m i,

' I

I

-

t

I

!

I

,

i

k

1

I

5

!

t-

i

I

4

6

t

f

!

,

1

!

-!

l

4

.. .

.

!

. * b

e

~

, ,

.. .

. .

.

.. .

ENGINEERING RESTART ITEMS :

u

a 20

0 __

s

_ __

33-

b --

2 16**<

s

m

W 14- -

x -

@ 12=

-

a 10-

-

z

< -

$ 8-m A A,

H ' --

o 6-- -

N,

% .,

o 4- 'x ~. ,

.A ~,

" a

2-

M M M NM-N-M-M-M TARGET LEVEL 0

m o < . . 1 A A-*-A+=-== =-- .

E 05/31 08/01 10/02 12/03

07/01 09/01 11/02 01/03

-m- MODIFICATIONS --A BENEFICIAL CHANGES

NOTE: INITIAL DATA FOR MODS INCLUDES THOSE ISSUED PRIOR TO 6/1/93.

CHANS

__._ _. - - _ . _ _ . . . _ _ . _. . . . _ . . . _ . . . . __ _ _ . . . . _ . . . ~ _. _ _ _._ _ __ _ ..__-_-._, ._ -

. ..

- -

DESIGN / PHYSICAL PLANT CHANGES

-

NC PCFs

200

Q -

J 180-

O 160

> 140

---

-

<(

=*

8 120" N [

3go \._g- .

_

A x

\/,'=,"/ , , m_,

gg '

en

LL. 60- tan a er Lev e e so . ... ..... ...... .. ... . ... ....."... ..... .. ...... ....... ......

o

Q,, 40=

............... ..

.

0 20-

. Z , ,

l .o , , ,

05/31 08)o1 10/02 12/03

l

.

07/01 09/01 11/02 01/03

i

\

l

-=- TOTAL NCPCFs

I

l CHANr3B

l

l.

-@ _.v e * m m'-vw w' ses-*e-- d% w e-w-Si- W- -4 eec= P 4 <euee44+-- e 4M'N 4 "Tu 9 P- P gredP *eM* te w 9+ --W== e Wew-en*me-rdev--t-~*y-rw-ew! * -sh-e- er h ts e-us=e rwew+'r--

. .

. . ..

9

DESIGN /PHYSICALL PLXNT CHANGES

O

-TEMP MODS

J

O 20

W -

--

I 18- ---

& -

-

8,16-- . ------.s a

14 m-,2=-m -

e E)xM---M

12-

'

, m-m; -

M

,

A,

o 10-

-

2 iEE.. sM N,

E A

CL

.

8- '

-

'

.,

6- N '.,

'

-

@ .

\ A

H

*.;

Q 4- Gl. '

.

LU '

's -O p i.,

$ 2

-

i'

e TARGET LEVEL 0 b .

! CC 0 ,.

! j$ 09/01 11/02 01/03

10/02 12/03

[

j -m- TEMP. MODS O ORIGINAL PROJEGION --A- CURRENT PROJECTION

L

CHANr5C .

. . __ __ . - _ __ . -.- __ _

-

.

N

5

ts 'i

N

r

.i

O

i

. !

!

! ! !

+

!

,

! i z +

1 [B: 4 b '

i a 4 144 v; o -

E: -4

i

'

_E i- 'A ; 4

6) I

4 4

E

4ll

-

Z i E ! 4 1

-

'

o>

O i f l74 $

A

-

h

, ( 8,'

i

o

i

<4 .5 T 4 c)

< .'

E' ': 8

d

1# Et

) E

> !

4 E

$@ N

m m

._J tU :

J !

t

! !

Cd Z .

4 N O

'

>

w :

E $

a i

T

4

t :

E

l

$0 4

1

-

O O

E 10 4 i

!

z

- !

i

!

1

\

1

,-

o 4

m

g : 1. ,

5 i 4 E M; @4 - %

(D C

W :

[,,'

' '

j,- :

!

k

i

h - .

I

d

m

O

2 !E$ N; 0 4

"

E

\ iM t ! 4Q

! H 6

O N\ i

r

IN

't O o

g ! iIt t

kl O

':

~

H Z

ll.] :

s

t

l -

! : : : E $ :

i 9 E

ED(:

i !

u, : :

,1 i i i r-

l O

l .

i i. ..

! -s

.

'

b ON

.

O b b b b O b

O O

O O O O O O O 1

O V N O O O v W l

'

r- v- v- r-

!

S.LN31A10000 dO B391AIGN ;

I

,

.

.' I

,

'

- -

. , .. ;

ENGINEERING EVALUATIONS

O

- J 100

0 -- --

- 90=

e --

-

>-

" 80*N"

70

Z

< 60-

I

i- 50m

. N m

E

.

'% "

40 :+ ....

W .y--m...........s....w\

'l-

30 --

}<-- % \\

W 20=

x 'M

e s " "

C

,

10- A'N"'...

m ..

m......................~m.......m............._,....'i,j.......... TARGET LEVEL 0

0 0 9--+--9--9-"em * - r r w -- * ----= - ---- =

Z 09/10 11/09 01/08

10/10 12/09

-=- TOTAL -o- OERs -*-- SPRs

---m- Non-Des. PCFs -*--- DCNs -A- DCRs caans

r--- -

w W -'-w- * * - - 9v * 'T * u T- * 'r VP E --'r-T -7 - --'N' * - - Y -'*P'

.

.. .. .

t

ADMINISTRATIVE / PROGRAMMATIC CHANGES

-

VENDOR DOCUMENTS

400

$

z 350-

s N

a 300 *

g

b 250- ~=

x \"

o

o 200

z x.

W \

> 150 %,

=

o s-m

x 100-

Nx

W

m as

2 50- =

a

2 TARGET LEVEL 0 -

,

mm., _ ,

. ,. ,

0 01/03

05/31 07/01 08/01 09/01 10/02 11/02 12/03

-m- VENDOR DOCUMENTS

chan3r3A

.

. _ _ _ - _____m.m_-.n._..e . w ..~--.-e- e r. * * -- .+--a%.-. e -1-. --~4- -.e. -e, *--w rw m- '-

=e -- ae- - w +3 + w - -

-

. .

.

. ..

>

ADMINISTRATIVElPROGRAMMATIC CHANGES

-KEY DRAWINGS OVERDUE

60 ;

vi

G

3 50- -

-~

o

W

, . . - -

m

D

Q ~

@ 30-

>

O

20=

$

C

m

m 10-

2

a Target Level 0

Z

-=----- =-

0 -=-- - m-=-=-=-=-= 10/02-= -=-= ,=-=-= -=12 /03

-

'

05/31 07/01 08/01 09/01 11/02

-=- KEY DWGS.

chan3r3b

. _ _ . _ _ _ - - . . . _ - . _ , . . _ , . . . . . . _ . _ . . , . . . .- . _ _ - - , - . _ . . . . _ . , , _ _ . _ . . - . _ _ . _ _ , . - _ _ . _ . . _ . _ . _ . . . _ - . , . _ , . , . . - . . -

- - -

.

. ..

ADMINISTRATIVE / PROGRAMMATIC CHANGES

-MPLs Greater Than 60 Days Okl

120

m

e

g 100-

/\ y

=

.

o

8 80

\ -

,

7

m

I -

\M

'

g 60--

u_ \

o \

oc 40

uJ

m

2

a 20- -

z

TARGET LEVEL 0

o- N, " x .- -= . ;. . ,

09/03 10/04 11/04 12/05- 01/05

-m- MPLs > 60 Days Old

chan3r3c

u-___._.___ . . . _ _ _

- --

. _ . - . _ _ . - . _ . _ - . _ . - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . . - . . , _ - - . , . . _ . _ . . _ . _ . . . . _ . . . _ , . . _ . . , . _ . . . . . _ _ .,_ . . _ _ , . . _ . _ .

. ~. . . . . .

,

..

7

p

'!

..

.

I'

.

q t

O

.%

i _

r-

C .

'

!

i '

,

!

>N !

8

,

T li i

! -%

N .i

y% a

U h :

M '

i O

N : -%

qL !

" .

! l

N

WN e

i /* !

g

w-

a

i

i o W

b%

F

i

j

-%

O

b' '

MD / i

"

5 ;

h E- ! o

e

N

I $

l/E' ! N 98

k 7

E : O

R

m

g

N s ! O y

<'

i

%

N

4

N

~

-

% :

%@ N !

\ : O 8

-

h E gj g i

Ji O

'

N

@i m

cr i

D to w M N r- l

!

- SWBil ABOISlH BS/Wd dO BB9WnN :

,

i
i
. ;
. t
, , ., . - - , . - . . . . _ , , .
-
. .
. . ..
CARRYOVER FROM PAST PROGRAMS
160
u) --- -
m -- --
140-
u
._..
120 Ahs
_
s -
y3
<
LL. 100
s .
m_,
T x u-+%.. _ ~ ,
W:q
-
-
LL. 80-
O '\M
g
--
T 60-
u.1 'm_a
m -
og 4g_
mg . _
E "'EN
\
D 20- '
-
7 . _ _ x.................. .......................& _.. .
N_.
O! .
T^noeT ' eve' o , .. * " ~ * * - * c A 4 - A A,
,
05/31 08701 10/02 12/03
07/01 09/01 11/02 01/03
-=- TOTAL -*- RFAs --*-- FCRs
chanar2
. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . . _ . - .. __ _ _ - - . _ _ . . _ . _ . _ _ _ _ . . _ . _ . . _
'
. .
,, ., .
AUGMENTED TESTING PROGRAM
PROGRAM DISCUSSED IN LAST MEETING
AUGMENTED TESTING COMPLETED ON SDGs 12 AND 13
SUCCESSFUL RESULTS
TESTING OF SDG 11 SCHEDULED FOR NEAR FUTURE - INCLUDING AN
ABBREVIATED SIMULATED RUN
DETAILS OF OTHER SYSTEM / SUBSYSTEM TESTING PREVIOUSLY
PROVIDED
RESULTS WILL BE DISCUSSED I'N FUTURE MEETINGS
,
.
--- ,y.+..,.v. -y w+ -eme-e,_ ~ - , , . . . , , - # m ,,n.
! , ,*' o , f
-
.
.
G9
V
0 C
R
8
9
9 .
0
- -
0 .
.
r
a&
e tnt N
T
g'
lcglse ne A g in
..
unsret
Nii am mNN t
s is n
sl
s
ut
I
r aegr r
T
c
a ai aor
toh c ataa np t
rhrho ce ep
_
crMa e nrt rp
ou aa u
I
eu vD
r
iP P
,
CPMWS
D .
* * * *
.
g d .
N r e .
_
N g p in c -
s mor
_
ey A Y s .
V rnt n T e s c a
_
v r
-i a l
eirr
ge oio N g c e o Lrt t
rP
g
.
n s
t
.
t
ute H I
oeps tc s go s
nrt on N Mo o
gP ePr s
.._ cr C n n pi v U it e r s
ec S oiui r
n iPeDi
k g nd / pP es c
ES
xe
.
MngS D
C.
.
oi
ps nao c coua d'toircDs
a
r ouEaMr
o .
E eul r
D.
R
A RBPTDBDTWNMPCP
.
- * * **** ****
s
r d
e f
r e i
s c Ss
"mn Y
Xnf eeb
I
. p e
C Pb'
.
9 o .o i
A feo u no st
r g& uo r rl -
I
" g.sr P nfRt
goie PSA Pn i se dP i
nCI
o.m .
int
i
vk le de c
T R MrD P V tseue x
crc
F u eldo re ore r
N
E
F
G G
N N TeSSLRC/FiWCPF F
i .
.
IDRI
AR !
* **** .
S EE N *
E LE O
R CN
P UI lC
E N GN
s
N
.
gt
C E W. A m tn
I
V T re s in n e D e s
rys i
gmrem t
I
a teet
ns n r
R
O
J Sl
sC
y& sla ttlicma
etit gM la n
mi no pbic r ui sP d mE
g
ay ia gp dt /e p at Merirf .
MSne f.. iue ct hs c pmi l
t aM erCh eo -
ED T. ye uoeSPPRTPr
.
ll
FESTSCR P
* * * * *
-
n
g S
o g .i g t t m .
. t
e tnrin
s
eie n n A n ga r
n
. t c
T M se emi ng im
. niVde
e a er N
A
Drem O
H n ro d
-
r et r ieer
a iscn
l e I
C T rep A .
_ .
t
se eui A enia
ggp lpun P
i
sh rN gV -
.
n ne F. ics ciV o TID
_
A
stP
E nED S i ornOEO
_ y DPEMVM
*** .
.
T
N
E
le M
& u N
t R F
n A G
r le3 e 7 m
I
S
to
cercF ui
!Tm
3 A
F m nrl
t
m
S
A
I
tr o o ga
r
an a
I
C f Cnn m M .
idea pe EA o
.
I
lc A. t
f
ab AcA R
u D D gf a x H R e T E
.
.
N
MSFRTPDS T .
N
,
****** I
.

,

,
.
.
.
.
.
' ;I
i i , 1 f ll'!.
m. ,,aF+a a ..A& J - .- . . . a*5. .
..4+-_, p .sh.A
pi
i
,
. S
i
>
J
l,
I
&
.[
l
-
T
t
O
H
<
H
w t
w
LIJ +
Z
-
!
O
< l
$ l
a
<
Z ,
O
~ '
m :
A :
O 1
1
L
M
-
-
i
i
,
'!.
.
l
I
!
.
t
J
.
- -
.
- .
. . .
k
STATUS OF RESTART ISSUES
Issue Status Inspections inspections
Completed Scheduled
1. Turbine Driven AFW Pump Completed except for Mode 3 10/93 --
Reliability and Testing testing.
2. Station Problem Report Increasing management attention. 10/93 12/93
P meess (Baseline)
3. Service Request Backlog Behind schedule for restart goal. I1/93 --
(in Progress)

4. Post Maintenance Test Completed - ready for NRC 10/93 --
Program review 11/93. I1/93
(In Progress)
5. Engineering Backlog On schedule for restart goals. I1/93 --
6. Operations Staffing Completed except six crew 11/93 --
rotation - ready for NRC review 11/93 i
1i/93. (In Progress)
7. Fire Brigade Training & Completed. 10/93 --
Qualification
8. Fire Protection liardware Completed except for Service 10/93 12/93
Request backlog - ready for (Follow up on
review 12/93. SR backlog)
9. Management Effectiveness Continued emphasis. Each inspection Each Inspection
'10. SPEAKOUT Program Ready for NRC review 11/93. I1/93- --
(In Progress) .
Table Page 1 of 2
. ____ _ __ _ _ _ . . _ _
- _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ . __ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ . . -- _. _ ,_ _ . _ . _ . _ _ _
, .
., -
STATUS OF RESTART ISSUES
Issue Status Inspections Inspections
Completed Scheduled
11. Standby Diesel Generator Completed-ready for NRC review 11/93 12/93
Reliability 12/93.
12. Essential Chiller Reliability Modification and performance i0/91 01/94
test scheduled 12/93 - ready for 11/93
NRC review.
13. System Certification Program In process - ready for NRC Ongoing Ongoing
review.
14. Feedwater Isolation 13ypass Completed. I1/93 --
15. Tornado Dampers Completed. 10/93 --
11/93
16. Emergency Prep. Completed. I1/93 -
Accountability
i
!
I
i
Table Page 2 of 2
l
i
. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ s .. . - , ~- , . _ , , . ~ , . . . - - - ._,m. .. . ,- . . _ , . . _ . , - . . -. ._
<
'. .
.
LINE MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT
MODE 6 ASSESSMENT PROCESS WAS SUCCESSFUL
EXPERIENCE WILL PROVIDE MODEL FOR MODES 4 AND 2
PROCESS RESULTED IN SYSTEMATIC CRITICAL SELF-APPRAISALS
ISSUES WERE IDENTIFIED AND RESOLVED
E.G., CONDUCT OF OPERATIONS, MOVs
PROVIDED BASIS FOR. MANAGEMENT TO MAKE DECISIONS
CONCERNING MODE CHANGE
WILL CONTINUE TO IMPROVE PROCESS
,
. , . ~ . , ~ . . . - , . . _ . . _ , , , _ ~ . _ . , , . . , - - - . _ . . . ~ . _ . _ _ . . _ . _ . . . . . . , . .
_
. , . - , , _ . . - . . . - . , - . . . . . _ - . _ . . . . . _ _ , . . , . . . . . , . . ~ - _ , . . . . _ . . . _ , , _ . - . . - . , _ , , . . .
?
.
I
h
e
s- :
!

!
i
?
I
f
i
,
!
,
?
!
>
e

f
f
Z
O
-
-
.
I
/% .
?
U
-
l
-
-
M :
LO l
0 i
,
W &
'
f.O
L
&
>
w
<
,
!

l
i
!
' f
6
k
e
+
$
t
1
. .
. .
. . . .
SYSTEM READINESS REVIEW
OTGP03-ZA-0005
.
status through 11/24/93 ,
Number
70
61 61 61
^
'
60 -
_ - # !
50 -
4
40 -
30 -
,,
)
A
20 -
10 -
0
' ' ^ =l ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
1001 10/06 1G11 10/14 10/19 10/22 10/27 11/01 11/04 11/09 11/12 11/17 11/22 11/29
Workday
i
Scheduled Approved Approved
for RRC by RRC by PM
: -
. -. _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ - - . -
. - _ . _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ . _ - . _ . - _ . . . _ - . _ ,. . . . . - . _ . . - - - _ - _ . _ . . . _ . _ . _ . - . . - . - - _ _ - . . . . . -
.. . .
. .
UNIT 1
SYSTEM CERTIFICATION
Status as of 11-29-93
Number of Systems
70
60 -
/
-
'
50 -
.-
'
40 #
.
-
30 - -
,~
20 - -
-. . ,. ! ,-
-
g-'~~ r
-
10 g* " ' i -'
-
' ~*~ '~'-'~r-~~
.-
'
~
' ' ' '
0
11-8 11-22 12-6 12-20 1-3-94 1-17
'
11-15 11-29 12-13 12-27 1-10 1-24
WALKDOWNS ACCEPTED PLANNED ACCEPTANCE ACTUAL ACCEPTANCE SR'S GENERATED
COMFLETE BY SS BY PLT MGR BY PLT MGR BY WALKDOWNS
...... .- _ _ _ . t: a
_ . . _ _ . _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ .__ , . . _ _ _ _ . _ _ , , ,_. _ _ . . . . . - , _ . _ . . _ _ . . _ _ . . ~ . . _ . .
~ - - - =
__
I
>
e
t
t

i
i
i
I
i
!
-i

F
- i
,f
i
I
t
3
i

!
t
.
t
w j
< :
e !
o !
O .!
M
a -i
H
Z i
w -i
2
Cc
-!

to ,
LLl '{t
Cn
to :
< !
H
Z
W !
O i
Z i
w :
A i
ell i
O 1
%
-
.j
4
I
i
!
!
!
6
l
!

e
!
-
,
I
'
-
t
t -

,
. 'i
I
!
Mr
.
.. .
,.
STP UNIT 1 OPERATIONAL READINESS PLAN - -1 -
WEEKLY SUMMARY OF INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT RESULTS
1993 1994
TOMC 10Nr 10/14 10/21 10/28 11/04 11/11 11/18 11r25 12/02 12M9 12/16 12/23 12/30 01MG 01/13 01/20
_
Business Plan N/A O O O O O O
W W W 'N W W
W gR
Plant Operations Q
y W R Y W
Chemical Operations O n,3 O O O O g
W W W W W g
Operations Work
(3 g N/A O O O C O
Control Group w w w w w
inie9ratmi O O O
Scheduling y y w w w y y
System Cert. & O O
Cont. Health Maint,
y
-
y w ,d G Y Y W
uaintenance O O O
Backlog Reduction y y w w w y y
Preventive
g N/A O O O O O
Maintenance g w w w w w
Specific Equipment
issues
N/A b b N/A N/A
w w w w
Engineering Backlog
N/A O O O
Reduction w w w, y - 'y 'y
LEGEND: Green = No problems identified
White (*) = Problems identified, no significant issues
Yellow (*) = Potentially significant issues identified which, if uncorrected, could affect ability to resume operations
Red (*) = Significant, uncorrected issues exist which affect ability to resume operations
N/A = No observations made
(*) = Explanations must be provided as an attachment
_._ . . . _ . _ _ . _ . . -
- . . . ~ . , . _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . , . - _ . _ - _ . , - - _. ._. . . _ _ _ - _ __. . _.-. . _ . _ . _ ___ _ _ __ _
.
, ,
. . .
-
STP UNIT 1 OPERATIONAL READINESS PLAN - -2-
WEEKLY SUMMARY OF INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT RESULTS
1993 1994
TOPIC 10/0r 10f14 10/21 10r28 11/04 11/11 11/18 11/25 12/02 12/09 12/16 12f13 12/30 01/06 01/13 01/20
Occrator Work-
N/A N/A N/A
Around Reduction V/ W
Y Y
Management
Oversight 'y
y y y -y y y
Managenwd
NIA O O O
Self-Assessment w w w 'y -
y -y
..
O O O O O
Traimn9
y , w w w w Sg
Organization, n,a O O O O O O
Staffing Levels W W W W W W
Information
N/A N/A 4
Resources W W * g Qg Qg
Corrective Action
Y
..
Y Y
..
Y
$R $R $R
l
Plant Retabeling N/A N/A N/A N/A g O N/A
Locked Valve
N/A O O O O
Program W W W ^
W
y y
m t Sur it ance ^ ^ OG G G G
LEGEND: Green = No problems identified
White (*) = Problems identified, no significant issues
Yellow (*) = Potentially significant issues identified which, if uncorrected, could affect ability to resume operations
Red (*) = Significant, uncorrected issues exist which affect ability to resume operations
N/A = No observations made
(*) = Explanations must be provided as an attachment
. . _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . . . . _ _ . _ . - . . . _ . . . _ . . ._ _ . _ _ , . ._ _
.
. .
o. .
. .
,
STP UNIT 1 OPERATIONAL READINESS PLAN - ' 3-
-
WEEKLY SUMMARY OF INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT RESULTS
1993 E
TOPIC 10/07 10/14 10f21 10/28 11/04 11/11 11/18 11/25 12/02 12/09 12f16 12/30 01/06
12/23 01/13 0t/20
Post-Maintenance
Testing
N/A N/A N/A O
W 'y 'y 'y
'
MOV Testing N/A N/A s
O O
y y -y W W
(
Activity Performance , g $R $R $R $R
Y .Y G
Modifications N/A g N/A N/A O g
G R Y
Component Reviews . --
Y ~Y 'Y Y s .Y Y Y
Radiological
Closcout/ Cleanup
N/A N/A N/A O ,
W -y y a
Emergent Work N/A N/A N/A g g g $G
G G G
Engineering Support N/A g g g $G g O
G G G G
Configuration
Management -y 'y
- g g g g
Y R R R R
LEGEND: Green = No problems identified
White (*) =- Problems identified, no significant issues
Yellow (*) = Potentially significant issues identified which, if uncorrected, could affect ability to resume operations
fled (*) = Significant, uncorrected issues exist which affect ability to resume operations
N/A = No observations made
(*) = Explanations must be provided as an attachment
- . _ _ . . _ _ _ . . . _ _ . _ ~ _ . _ . _ _ - . _ _ _ _ . _ . . , - . . - _ _ . . _ . _ . . . . _ . . . . _ _ - , , _ . ~ - . , - _ _ . . . _ . . ~ - . . . . _ . . . _ ~ . . _ - . -_ - .
_ _ - . . _ .
,
.
. .
.
.
-
. .. -, .
6

INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT REPORTING IMPROVEMENTS -
I
i
CHANGE IN FOCUS-
EVALUATE CUMULATIVE PERFORMANCE
CHANGE IN TIME
MORE DATA
BETTER TRENDING
.
9
,
>=m.._+=, v e- # ,*..,.--.-=.-,==w* ..w+..%%.-w.y.-=-~w.. .-.t.--.vm...- ww -e.-.---vewu--- ----*-a---s-w-r-e-- - .%- ----- .- w,.- -
..-e-- r- - - . ---e-----e-.----- . . - - . . .--e- , - - --
. .
. ..
... . . .
OPERATIONAL READINESS OVERSIGHT TEAM
,
COMPLETED 21 MAN-DAYS OF PLANT OBSERVATIONS, INTERVIEWS, AND
DOCUMENT REVIEWS
MANAGEMENT PRACTICES, IN-PLANT OPERATIONS, RESOURCES, .
EQUIPMENT AND PROCESSES ARE IMPROVING AND WILL SUPPORT
JANUARY 1994 STARTUP
.
CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM AND OPERATING EXPERIENCE REVIEW
PROGRAM SHOULD RECEIVE IMMEDIATE ATTENTION
NEXT ASSESSMENT PERIOD SCHEDULED FOR MID-DECEMBER
,
1
!
s
v,- -.wh.,=ws--w*,-+-=,---ene <=--t-.-me+%-.www,. *ar*-- .:rn -w w.-=.ws=-w .++-,w-+r. .w+-+=w,,*,rv-v .=r--n--t-=e-c--w!c-was +evrv+-.i.
- -1, , rw--m w- ,--iee e eunt-w-w-<.4ywa-*-se,-wrvr,---e-r--w.e- -*---i-w-evW,=ww,..wrw cev s wur ve~ e-,+,u- e.--e.--w.-+r--,---
4a.+.2 4 .u4 _ e 4.s . .-. 4 a 4 . -.6 4.w. .u.o a
,
h
.

. t
f
r
S 4
,
I
5
l
2
f
i
'
F
!
k
>
I
.
,
?
.
i
!P
I
,
-
.
D
9
- k
k
7
s
?
t
] .
D :
O i
W
-
.
!
4 l
U !
w e
r
i
O
$
!

H '
'
cd
!
<C
, ,
F !
W :
i
i
'
!
,
.
i
.
I
!
.
'
1
i
i
.>
!
i
.
t

t
9
I
.
.
E

n
I
.i
.
}
f ,
i
4
4
- ,
i
s
v ,-e--- m e - - , .+ - ,. .- - .- -> 4m., , ,w , -, s e e a gr- , -- -.

. . . .
Plant Startup
Timeline
Restart inspections
,.,------- - ____
I
l
11/15 11/22 11/29 12/6 12/13 12/20 12/27 1/3 1/10 1/17 1/24 1/31 2/7 2/14 2/21 2/28 3,rt 3/14 3/21 3/28 4A. 4/11 4/18 4/25
I I I I I I I i I i
i

i
i

k :

e
-..-.-.-
ik
i
k k\
i
n A nn
. . . . . .' : . . . . : _ . . . . .. \
OROT1 ORAT 1 OROT 2 \ ORAT 2
\
Unit 1
Mode 2
Unit 1 Unit 2 Unit 2 Unit 2 Unit 2
Ready for Unit 1 Public Briefing Ready for
Mode 6 Mode 4 Mode 2
Mode 4 Mode 4 (tentative) Mode 4
OROT. STP Intomal Readiness Assessment
ORAT- NRC Readiness Assessment
Next Public Meeting: January 7,1994
_ . _ . _ _ _ _ . _
. . _
.- ._ , . . _ . .
! > l 1
, ,
.
.
.
_
m
y
.
.
,
-
+
-
m
,
+
-
-
-
_
-
g
,
-
-
-
.
-
w
-
M w
m
A
,
.
.
R ,
c.
G .,
-
O
R ,
,
P
-
S -
-
N 4
R ,-
E ,
+
C
N
O --
C w
w
w
Y
T
I .
L
A -
,.
U ,-
Q ,
D .
N
A e
,
m
Y
T
-
.
E -
F w
A -
S -
.
m
R w
,
-
._
A
e
,

E
,
_
_
k
i
N
.
.
.
.
.
.
. m
-
m
-
-
_
. . . , . , ,
f
'
NUCLEAR SAFETY AND OUALITY CONCERNS PROGRAM

COMMISSIONED OUTSIDE CONSULTANTS TO EVALUATE SPEAKOUT IN
AUGUST 1993
SCOPE / METHODOLOGY 1
POLICIES FOR REPORTING AND RESOLUTION OF CONCERNS
ORGANIZATION / STAFFING
COMPARISON TO SUCCESSFUL PROGRAMS ELSEWHERE ,
EMPLOYEE INTERVIEWS
PROTECTION OF CONFIDENTIALITY
CLOSURE OF ISSUES AND REPORTING OF RESULTS
TRAINING REGARDING SPEAKOUT
. . . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - . _ . _ _ . _ . . . _ _ . . . _ . . . _ .-. _ . .._ _ _....__ _ .. _ ._. . _.._. _. - ._ ._ - . . _ . - _ _ . _ _
-
. . . . . . .
NUCLEAR SAFETY AND OUALITY CONCERNS PROGRAM (Cont.)
KEY EVALUATION RESULTS
SPEAKOUT USES MANY INDUSTRY GOOD PRACTICES
SPEAKOUT INVESTIGATIONS ARE THOROUGHLY DOCUMENTED
MEASURES ARE USED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY (SOME
EMPLOYEES PERCEIVE BREACH OF CONFIDENTIALITY IN SOME CASES)
LARGE MAJORITY OF EMPLOYEES COMFORTABLE GOING TO
SPEAKOUT WITH CONCERNS
'"LAW ENFORCEMENT" TYPE INVESTIGATION METHODS AND
INVESTIGATIONS OF WRONGDOING / FALSIFICATION ISSUES MAKE
SOME EMPLOYEES UNCOMFORTABLE
PROGRAM HAMPERED BY INVESTIGATION OF NON-NUCLEAR
SAFETY / QUALITY ISSUES (>85%)
IMPROVEMENTS IN TRAINING WARRANTED (INCLUDING
MANAGERS / SUPERVISORS)
1
.-- _ _-. . . - - . .-. . - - . - - . -. _- _. - .. . -- .--
- ,
. . . . . . .
NUCLEAR SAFETY AND OUALITY CONCERNS PROGRAM (Cont.)
ACTIONS UNDERWAY / PLANNED
PROGRAM RENAMED AND REFOCUSED ON NUCLEAR SAFETY (OTHER
ISSUES HANDLED ELSEWHERE)
NSQP M.ANAGER TO REPORT DIRECTLY TO GROUP VICE PRESIDENT,
NUCLEAR
OUTSIDE CONTRACT OR LOANED MANAGER FOR NEAR TERM
METHODS OF EVALUATION BEING CHANGED (AVOID USE OF " LAW
ENFORCEMENT" INVESTIGATION TECHNIQUES)
INVESTIGATIONS BY MANAGEMENT HANDLED BY OTHER GROUPS
ENHANCED GET AND SUPERVISORY TRAINING
COMMUNICATION WITH SITE PERSONNEL
<
-L, n 2 -ap., a p 4 4--. .ax.,-
-- ea,.,1.x - am ws - ,- - + , s ,n i, a s,_-
f
f
O ;
e
f
O .
>
l
,i
6
i-
D
,
t
I
r
!
t
t
I
r
.
m
,
2
b
6
-
f.
, ,
p
!
'
, M !
cd :
<
-
.
1
6
.
U.1
I
Cd
.
Z
-
O ;
.3 .
-
O ,
?
A
9
I
>
r
$
5'
b
t
I
!
.
' k
!
-i
i
'!
-

i
.
. ?
.;
&: I
e f
.,
.
'l .
t

ML20058J538

Text

Navigation menu

Search