ML20058H368

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Insp Rept 50-374/93-34 on 931102-09 & Notice of Violation.Violations Illustrate Continued Problems Re Radiological Controls Previously Discussed in Insp Repts & During 931005 Enforcement Conference
ML20058H368
Person / Time
Site: LaSalle Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 12/06/1993
From: Axelson W
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Wallace M
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
Shared Package
ML20058H372 List:
References
NUDOCS 9312130057
Download: ML20058H368 (4)


See also: IR 05000374/1993034

Text

f.

-

DC/D

9'

,

DEC

61993

Docket No. 50-374

i

License No. NPF-18

Commonwealth Edison Company

ATTN: Mr. M. J. Wallace

i

Vice Presdient, Chief

i

Nuclear Officer

Executive Towers West III

1400 Opus Place, Suite 300

-

Downers Grove, IL 60515

Dear Mr. tSllace:

SUBJECT:

SPECIAL RADIATION PROTECTION INSPECTION AT LASALLE COUNTY STATION

This refers to the special safety inspection conducted by Mr. P. L. Louden and

Mr. M. A. Kunowski of this office on November 2 through 9, 1993.

The

,

inspection included a review of activities authorized for your LaSalle

facility.

At the conclusion of the inspection, the findings were discussed

with those members of your staff identified in the enclosed report.

Areas examined during the inspection are identified in the report.

The

l

purpose of the inspection was to review an incident which occurred on

October 31, 1993, while two operators were performing post maintenance valve

,

inspections in the Unit 2 Reactor Water Cleanup Hold Pump Room.

One of the

-

operators received an administrative overexposure of radiation.

During this inspection, certain of your activities appeared to be in violation

l

of NRC requirements, as specified in the enclosed Notice of Violation

(Notice).

These violations are of concern because they illustrate the

,

continued problems with respect to radiological controls previously_ discussed

.

in NRC inspection reports and during an October 5, 1993 Enforcement

!

Conference.

Failure to plan for and recognize the potential for changing

radiological conditions has been a continuing problem at your facility.

i

Additionally, failure to heed electronic dosimeter alarms is a disturbing and

+

potentially significant safety problem. The proper response of radiation

f

workers to alarming dosimeters is an expectation which must be thoroughly

1

understood by radiation workers and enforced by station management.

An

!

environment in which a complacent attitude towards electronic dosimeter alarms -

can exist must not be allowed to occur or be tolerated.

i

We reviewed this event for the possibility that a substantial potential for a

,

regulatory overexposure existed and concluded that given the circumstances of

,

the case it may not have met that threshold. Nevertheless, we have strong

!

concerns about the event because it involved radiological worker performance

problems similar to those discussed in a recent Escalated Enforcement action.

  • G O\\

-

100030

\\9

9312130057 931206

,

PDR

ADDCK 05000374

'

O

PDR

,

--

<

m

- -

~ . - .

_ _ _ - . - - . . _ _ _ _ - - . - - , . ~ , - . -

b-

.

.

Commonwealth Edison Company

2

DEC

61993

If you choose to do so you may include the causes and corrective actions

addressing the event detailed in the enclosed report in your response to the

Escalated Enforcement-action dated November 17, 1993.

You are required to respond to this letter and should follow the instructions

specified in the enclosed Notice when preparing your response.

In your

response, you should document the specific actions taken and any additional

actions you plan to prevent recurrence. After reviewing your response to this

Notice, including your proposed corrective actions and the results of. future

inspections, the NRC will determine whether further NRC enforcement action is

necessary to ensure compliance with NRC regulatory requirements.

.In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of

this letter, the enclosures, and your response to this letter will be placed

in the NRC Public Document Room.

The response directed by this letter and the accompanying Notice are not

subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as

required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.

We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.

Sincerely,

m ;g 5 4 0 U % i-

u'-

W. L. Axelson, Director

Division of Radiation Safety and

Safeguards

Enclosures:

1.

Notice of Violation

2.

Inspection Report

No. 50-374/93034(DRSS)

See Attached Distribution

(SEE ATTACHED SHEET)D

Rlli

Rill

Rill

RIII

RI

RI I

Rill

te

Ax

Louden /jp

Kunowski

Snell

Hague

n

De/$y

g (qn,p

12/ /93

12 ,

-

.- .. .--

.

.

-

.

-

.

.- _,

.

-

'

Commonwealth Edison Company

2

You are required to respond to this letter and should follow the instructions

specified in the enclosed Notice when. preparing your response.

In your

response, you should document the specific actions taken and any additional

!

actions you plan to prevent recurrence. After reviewing your response to.this

l

Notice, including your proposed corrective actions and the results of future

inspections, the NRC will determine whether further NRC enforcement action is

u

necessary to ensure compliance with NRC regulatory requirements.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of

this letter, the enclosures, and your response to this letter will be placed

,

in the NRC Public Document Room.

,

The response directed by this letter and the accompanying Notice are not

subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as

required by ti.a Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.

,

We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.

Sincerely,

W. L. Axelson, Director

'

Division of Radiation Safety and

,

Safeguards

>

F

Enclosure:

Inspection Report

No. 50-374/93034(DRSS)

cc w/ enclosure:

L.O. DelGeorge, Vice President,

!

Nuclear Oversight and Regulatory Services

J. Schmeltz, Acting Station Manager

J. Lockwood, Regulatory Assurance

Supervisor

'

D. Farrar, Nuclear Regulatory

>

Services Manager

l

OC/LFDCB

Resident Inspectors LaSalle

!

Dresden, Quad Cities

'

Richard Hubbard

- J. W. McCaffrey, Chief, Public

Utilities Division

1

Licensing Project Manager, NRR

Robert Newmann, Office of Public

>

Counsel

-l

State Liaison Officer

t

Chairman, Illinois Commerce

,

Commission

bcc w/ enclosure:

!

PUBLIC

'

/

'

RIII

RIII

RIII

I

RIII

RIII

Nwski

12/ 1/93

ab/n

a /P

12f'/U

L

en/jp

1

T ue

erson

Axelson

'

'T

!

t

.

.

DEC

6 1993

l

Commonwealth Edison Company

3

i

Distribution

i

cc w/ enclosures:

L. O. DelGeorge, Vice President,

-l

Nuclear Oversight and Regulatory Services

W. Murphy, Site Vice President

t

J. Schmeltz, Acting Station Manager

J. Lockwood, Regulatory Assurance

i

Supervisor

)

D. Farrar, Nuclear Regulatory

.

Services Manager

!

OC/LFDCB

!

Resident Inspectors LaSalle

>

Dresden, Quad Cities

Richard Hubbard

J. W. McCaffrey, Chief, Public

!

i

Utilities Division

Licensing Project Manager, NRR

l

Robert Newmann, Office of Public

,:

'

Counsel

State liaison Officer

i

Chairman, Illinois Commerce

l

Commission

l

'

bcc:

PUBLIC

i

!

!

I

r

i

!

!

i

[

i

.

i

,

!

3

- - , ,

,.

. - . . . - . , ,

,

.,

.

.-

.

-