ML20058E036

Transcript Corrections (Second Prehearing conference,930921- 22).* Board Adopts Listed Corrections.W/Certificate of Svc. Served on 931201

ML20058E036
Person / Time
Site:	Rancho Seco
Issue date:	11/30/1993
From:	Bechhoefer C Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
To:
References
CON-#493-14497 93-677-01-DCOM, 93-677-1-DCOM, DCOM-R, NUDOCS 9312060132
Download: ML20058E036 (8)

Text

.

6'

^>

b i

UNITED. STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 0 1993 C

l ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD y

4 Before Administrative Judges:

j II I

Charles Bechhoefer, Chairman Dr. Richard F. Cole Thomas D. Murphy l

@ Ej. j%

In the Matter of Docket No. 50-312-DCOM-R l

I

')

SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL (Decommissioning Plan)

UTILITY DISTRICT t

(Rancho Seco Nuclear ASLBP No. 93-677-01-DCOM-R i

Generating Station, Facility Operating License No. DPR-54)

November 30, 1993 ll

't TRANSCRIPT CORRECTIONS (Second Prehearina Conference. September 21-22.1993) l On October 1, 1993, Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) submitted proposed transcript corrections for the prehearing conference held on September 21-22, 1993.

By Order dated October 5, 1993, we invited other parties to

'j do so.

On October 14, 1993, the Staff submitted proposed

[

corrections. (ECO has not submitted proposed corrections.)

l The Board hereby adents the following corrections (including f

several of its own):

Proposina F_qq.q Line Change T.e j

]

Party September 21, 1993 Staff 183 12 Order Orders l

Staff 183 19 or on or rather on j

1 1

9312060132 9311*JO PDR ADOCK 05000312 T

PDR :.

$0 L _

.j

=__

4 ' Proposino F. :e Line Chance To Party ASLB 184 7-8 environmental Environmental and and resources Resources Conservation '

conservation Organization organization ASLB 184 11 environmental I vironmental Staff 185 6

matter manner ASLB 185 16 on and ASLB 185 25 individuals individual Staff 186 16 Crespos as Crespo's has Staff 188 7

Registry Register SMUD 188 15 beyond to be put on Staff 189 9

have the I have, the one I Staff 189 25 of off SMUD 190 8

CAGMNUC DAGM-NUC SMUD 190 9

ongrading bond rating SMUD 196 11 ignored, some ignored, to provide some SMUD 196 12 last "and" in the SMUD 197 4

April at April 1st, at SMUD 197 6

That's of SMUD 198 17 we have ECO has SMUD 199 1

safe store SAFSTOR SMUD

'199 17 help health Staff 199 21 Then it is SMUD 201 2

nearly merely SMUD 201 14 his municipal an admissible Staff-201 23 haven't hasn't SMUD 202 4

costs.

costs."

SMUD 202 17 5054. (b) (B) 50.54(bb)

Staff 203 4

is forming a is informing the SMUD 203 8

50.92 50.82 Staff 203 11 and I'give and give SMUD 204 1

5054.(b)(B) 50.54(bb)

SMUD 204 4

now requires would now require ASLB 204 10 5054 (b) (B) 50.54(bb)

SMUD 204 15 5054 50.54 SMUD 204 15 5082 50.82 SMUD 205 10 5054 (b) (B) 50.54(bb)

SMUD 205 11 operation operating Staff 206 24 notice is noticed separately separately Staff 207 9

replacement placement Staff 208 6

fuel.

fuel-storage.

SMUD 208 12 05864-12 0586 at page 4-20 SMUD 208 12 active

" active SMUD 208 15 will would SMUD 208 17 facility facilitation for licensing decommissioning."

aspects.

i l,

_3 t

Proposino Ea_gg Ling Chance Ig Party Staff 210 6

proceedings proceeding SMUD/ Staff 212 8-9, Allen Street Allens Creek 31 Staff 212 9

amending amending 2.714, i

statement Staff 212 10 statement its statement of consideration consideration j

i SMUD 213 25 show he show if he SMUD 214 12 some from the t

SMUD 214 13 fuel to fuel pool to Staff 216 4

pool fuel SMUD 216 22 TLD TLG SMUD 217 15 dependents applicants l

Staff 219 2

buy but Staff 219 6

decommissions decommissioning i

Staff 222 11 hear year

.8% increase an 8.8% annual increase

.j SMUD 222 17 a

i SMUD 222 20 it's he's SMUD 223 23 hears the is whether there is ASLB 224

-18 would have a went out'of

-l

?

ASLB 226 23 second "what" whether ASLB 230 24 matters, not matter, is that not

.l f

SMUD-231 1

BARTH BAXTER r

Staff 232 10 may maybe Staff 233 17 MR. MCGRANERY: JUDGE BECMHOEFER:

j SMUD 234 14 2758 2.758 l

ASLB 238 3-4 license? That license that ASLB 238 18 possessor possession SMUD 242 9

no not f

ASLB 243 2

for from ASLB 243 2

considerr.cion considerations-ASLB 244 25 of the and Staff 245 2

has sucmitted has been submitted SMUD 249 13 load management load in in

'SMUD 251 17 fund.

fund.

l i

SMUD 251 19 The When the SMUD/ASLB 253 16 effective affected Staff 260 15 can management can have load management 1

(

SMUD 261 5

sole soul Staff 264 12 live' life Staff 266 25 plant plan SMUD 267 24 plant plan Staff 272 22,25 plant plan l

1 SMUD 274 12-SKUG SMUD Staff 278 18 and contention and a contention ASLB 280' 20 it. -

it several days later, j

d

.. ~..

~

. -.. -.. ~ -

.- ~ ~,.

-4

-[

Proposina Page Ling Chance 12 Party SMUD 284 20 hard and safe hardened SAFSTOR store Staff 286 3

previous previously i

SMUD 290 5

isn't is in Staff 291 23 valid, should valid contention, should ASLB 300 15 eminent imminent SMUD 306 13 goal.

comparison, not with net income.

SMUD 308 10 we assume you're ECO assumes you should j

speculating speculate i

Staff 312 3

hasn't shown hasn't been shown ASLB 312 14 and said and it said Staff 314 6

gull gaul SMUD 318 9

safe store SAFSTOR.

Staff 320 4

GAGM DAGM SMUD 336 36 place..

place of needing the funds.

l Staff 346 23 do not come do come Staff 347 11 to submitted to be submitted 3

Staff 347 24 2206 2.206 Staff 350 1

out of the out as a ASLB 351 10 on of Staff 351 11 remover removed Staff 351 14 early earlier i

ASLB 359 12 Bechhoeffer Bechhoefer SMUD 362 7

Then, how How Staff 363 4

filled filed SMUD 363 17 documents to documents provided to ASLB 363 20 JUDGE BECHHOEFER:

MR. McGRANERY:

a ASLB 365 3

it 9 its SMUD 365 6

on new on the new Staff 365 13 loop LOOP SMUD, Staf f 365 13 -14 to late-to the late-filed-i SMUD 365 14 CFR, Section CFR Section 2.714(a) i 2.714(a), 1 (i)-(v) through 5

}

SMUD 366 6

hours, hours,"

SMUD 366 7

plan."

plan.

SMUD 366 11 "The the SMUD 3G7 24-25 while the week while we before, while we 3

SMUD 368 13 the it SMUL 368 22 on of Staff 370 2

and give and so give Staff 370 2

of on SMUD 370 9

have to Tave time to

~

SMUD 373 10 anaysis accident SMUD 373 25 an eight a four

'l l

{

+

a c,

t Proposina. Pace Line Chance To Party SMUD 374 5

irrelevant, irrelevant.

It i

that SMUD 378 12 New Reg NUREG SMUD 378 14 Zerkalloy Zircalloy SMUD 379 7

And is And that is l

SMUD 379 24 qualification to qualification.

To l

SMUD 380 16 LOOP.

These LOOP, these l

September 22, 1993 i

SMUD 392 17 red reg SMUD 396 14-15 at the second go a second ago SMUD 399 9

2.714 (a) (1)

2. 714 ( a) (i) -(v) j to (5)

SMUD 399 11 CLR 93 CLI-93-3 Staff 399 17-18, 2.714 (a) (1)

2. 714 (a) (1) to (a) (v) 22, to (a) (5) 24-25 Staff 400 6

2. 714 (a) (1) 2.714 (a) (i) through through (5)

(v) i SMUD 407 15-16 current fuel Permanently Defueled l

expect Technical Specifications Staff 408 18 NCFR 50.13 10 C.F.R. 50.13 SMUD 421 8

licensee, licensee's SMUD 421 13 "A

A SMUD 421 14 where "where i

SMUD 421 15 his position or its position and SMUD 421 17 supported supporting l

SMUD 427 1

new Reg 13.53 NUREG-1353 SMUD 431 8

contentions.

contentions."

ASLB 431 11 it's its l

SMUD 431 12 factors."

factors.

SMUD 433 7

loco LOCA SMUD 437 22 loco LOCA i

SMUD 437 23 loco LOCA SMUD 437 24 loco LOCA Staff 442 24 for forth i

SMUD 443 8

where of which Staff 443 12 need first need.

First Staff 443 14 document that document showing that this needed this is needed Staff 447 23 St. Lucy St. Lucie

q SMUD 451 12 their there i

SMUD 451 16 analysis report evaluation j

SMUD 453 17 fahrenheit, and fahrenheit.

A SMUD 453 19 140, the 140, if SMUD 453 19 lost.

A lost, a SMUD 454 6

to loss to a loss i

I 1

i

=.

, -r i

Proposina Pace Line phance lo Party SMUD 458 6

degree in degree

.[

SMUD 458 16 Ross Rossin SMUD 459 20 "Shows that "shows that for an l

initial initial SMUD 459 22 the fuel the spent fuel

+

SMUD 460 4

up, up SMUD 460 4

pool from pool water from SMUD 460 4

level of allowed normal l

ASLB 460 5

temperature temperature of SMUD 466 17 fuel pool fuel that's been in the pool SMUD 472 9

JUDGE BECHHOEFER MR. McGRANERY SMUD 472 24 not no

-r ASLB 473 20 it's its SMUD 474 22 standard standing SMUD 475 10 there premise their premise ASLB 478 18 of or Staff 480 5

because can because one can Staff.

480 5

by final to a final SMUD 480 21 station statement SMUD 481 19 safe-store SAFSTOR ASLB 484 22 later latter

-SMUD 486 13 COLE CLARK Staff 487 7

he the ASLB 488 5

coolant cooled SMUD, ASLB(489 23-) Delete duplicate paragraphs (490 19 )

SMUD 497 6

on no SMUD 497 8

ont not ASLB 497 '21 my case in the case of l

Staff 500 6

in the before a l

i Staff 500 11 grant request ASLB 502 11 give given SMUD 511 9

safe store SAFSTOR SMUD 518 14 safe store SAFSTOR SMUD 518 21 environment environs SMUD 519 2

safe store SAFSTOR-Staff 520 11 wave claim Staff 520 12 something some reason c

Staff 523 17 where it was and was not i

Staff 526 6

that's exactly that it is premised to on a SMUD 529 13 plant plants SMUD 532 4

proposed rule proposed decommissioning rule Staff 539 8

us is i

SMUD 545 2

staff licensee

+

i i

I 3

Proposino Page Line Chance To Party l

SMUD 548 23 Of course, JUDGE BECHHOEFER:

-l Of course, I

Staff 553 15 93-3 (twice)

CLI-93-3 f

I Staff 553 17 CLI-90.8-CLI-90-8 SMUD 554 21 ECO "ECO

[

SMUD 554 21 no action

'no action' SMUD 554 22 appropriate

' appropriate SMUD 554 24 potential.

potential.'"

SMUD 561 21 of ISFSI of the ISFSI l

SMUD 562 5

plant plan SMUD 565 8-9 December 1931 December 31, 1991 SMUD 565 13 6.8 6.80-SMUD 568 1

from December from December 31,

[

31, 1992 1991 SMUD 572 22 consistent, consistent with our plan, ASLB 574 11 749 2.749 motion T

IT IS SO ORDERED.

For the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board i

bit.

E bM

'i Charles Bechhoefer, / Chairman ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE Bethesda, Maryland i

November 30, 1993 l

t i

i P

1 l

L i

l i

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION i

In the Matter of SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY Docket No.(s) 50-312-DCOM DISTRICT i

(Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating l

Station (Decomissioning Plan))

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing LB TRANSCRIPT CORRECTIONS...

have been served upon the following persons by U.S. mail, first class, except as otherwise noted and in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR Sec. 2.712.

Office of Comission Appellate Administrative Judge Adjudication Charles Bechhoefer, Chairman i

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Washington, DC 20555 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Washington, DC 20555 Administrative Judge Administrative Judge.

Richard F. Cole Thomas D. Murphy Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission i

Washington, DC 20555 Washington, DC 20555 t

Charles A. Barth, Esq.

James P. McGranery, Jr., Esq.

Lisa B. Clark, Esq.

Counsel for Petitioner Office of the General Counsel 1255 23rd Street, N.W., Suite 750 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Washington, DC 20037 Washington, DC 20555 Thomas A. Baxter, Esq.

David R. Lewis, Esq.

Shaw, Pittman Potts & Trowbridge 2300 N Street, NW.

Washington, DC 20037 Dated at Rockville, Md. this I day of December 1993 g/

• I ILO

/

7lAlL Office of the Secretary of the Comission l

r S

h :-

- ~ ~.

.