ML20058C969
| ML20058C969 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Hatch  |
| Issue date: | 04/19/1982 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20058C883 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-366-82-08, 50-366-82-8, NUDOCS 8207260494 | |
| Download: ML20058C969 (1) | |
Text
-
APPENDIX ~A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Georgia Power Company Docket No. 50-366 Hatch 2 License No. NPF-5 As a result of the inspection conducted on March 2-5 and 16-19, 1982, and in accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy, 47 FR 9987 (March 9,1982), the following violation was identified.
10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, as implemented by paragraph 17.2.5 of the Hatch 2 FSAR, requires in part that, activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures, and drawings and shall be accomplished in accordance with these instructions, procedures, and drawings.
Division 4, Section 8, paragraph 8.5.3 of CB&I " Nuclear Quality Assurance Manual for ASME Section III Products", the applicable procedure for in process inspection of torus modification welds, requires that the CB&I Welding QA Supervisor assure that joints are properly fitup and aligned prior to welding. Det' ail "C" on contract ' drawing 71, revision 5, requires that both members of weld B-4 on drawing R56, revision 1 (torus downcomer reinforcement weld), be beveled 15.
1 Contrary to the above, on March 18, 1982, activities affecting quality were 4
not accomplished in accordance with documented procedures and drawings in-i that CB&I Welding QA Supervisor had signed off the fitup for weld B-4 and i
one member of the joint was cut square in lieu of the required 15 bevel.
i' This is a Severity Level V Vic9 tion (Supplement I.D.).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, you are hereby required to submit to this office within thirty days of the date of this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, including: (1) admission or denial of the alleged viola-l tion; (2) the reasons for the viciation if admitted; (3) the corrective steps l
which have been taken and the results achieved; (4) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations; and (5) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Consideration may be given to extending your response time for good cause shown.
Under the authority of Section 182 of the Atomic Energy Act of l
1954, as amended, this response shall be submitted under oath or affirmation.
Date:Jpn 1 9 1982__
1 8207260494 820716 PDR ADOCK 05000321 O
us:
4,9 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION n
E REGION 11 8
e 101 MARIETTA ST., N.W., SulTE 3100 ATLANTA, GEORo tA 30303 Report Nos. 50-321/82-08 and 50-366/82-08 Licensee: Georgia Power Company P. O. Box 4545 Atlanta, GA 30302 Facility Name:
Hatch Docket Nos. 50-321 and 50-366 License Nos. DPR-57 and NPF-5 Inspection at Plant Hatch site near Baxley, GA Inspectors:[.
O1 B. R. Crowley
' Date Signed b.Y Y/fff?
' J. L.JCo l y~
'Dat'e Signed Approved by:
Yb
/$
d A. R. Herdt, Section Chief (Dat6 Signed Engineering Inspection Branch Division of Engineering and Technical Programs
SUMMARY
Inspection on March 2-5, and 16-19,1982 Areas Inspected This routine, unannounced inspection involved 90 inspector-hours on site in the areas of inservice inspection (ISI) (Unit 2); welding and nondestructive examina-tion program for torus modifications (Units 1 and 2); IE Bulletin 80-08, examin-ation of containment liner penetration welds (Units 1 and 2); and previous inspection findings (Units 1 and 2).
Results Of the four areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified in three areas; one violation was found in one area (Violation - Failure to follow proce-dure for inspection of weld fitup, paragraph 8.a).