ML20058C745
| ML20058C745 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 08/30/1990 |
| From: | Matthews S, Potapovs U Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20058C740 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99901108 99901108-90-01, 99901108-90-1, NUDOCS 9011050046 | |
| Download: ML20058C745 (6) | |
Text
_
l ORGANIZATION: B&G MANUFACTURING COMPANY HATFIELD, PENNSYLVANIA REPC*'
INSPECTION INSPECTION N0.: 99901108/90-01 DATE: August 30, 1990 ON-SITE HOURS:
4 CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS:
B&G Manufacturing Company P.O. Box 269 3067 Unionville Pike Hatfield, Pennsyivania 19440' ORGANIZATIONAL CONTACT: James Sands, Quality Assurance Manager TELEPH0HE NUMBER:
(215)822-1925 NUCLEAR INDUSTRY ACTIVITY:
Fasteners J/
ASSIGNED INSPECTOR:
- //
Steven M. Matthews, Reactive Inspection SectionNo.1(RIS-1),VendorInspectionBranch(VIB)
OTHERINSPECTOR(S): Edward A. Fitzgerald, NRC APPROVED BY:
dE o ot-%n /2_ --
LO-ujo Uldis_Potapovs, Chief, RIS;1, VIB Date INSPECTION BASES AND SCOPE:
A. -
BASES:
10 CFR Part 21 and 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B B.
SCOPE:
The inspection was conducted to assess B&G Manufacturing Company's procurement of machining and special processes from vendors and to assess the corrective actions taken in response to the findings documented in Inspection Report No. 99901108/88-01 PLANT SITE APPLICABILITY: None identified.
9011050046 901023 PDR GA999 EMVBQMFQ 99901108 PNU
ORGANIZATION:
B&G MANUFACTURING COMPANY HATFIELD, PENNSYLVANIA REPORT INSPECTION NO.: 99901108/90-01 RESULTS:
1 AGE 2 of 6 i
A.
STATUS OF PREVIOUS INSPECTION FINDINGS:
1.
(Closed) Violation 88-01-01 Contrary to 10 CFR 21.31, a review of documentation packages revealed that 27 C&G Manufacturing Company (BGM) purchase orders (P0) did not specify that 10 CFR Part 21 would apply.
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (hkC) inspectors reviewed three documen-tation packages for nuclear quality fasteners and found that the P0s to vendors did specify that 10 CFR Part 21 would apply.
BGM's corrective actions taken to prevent recurrence were adequate and this item is considered closed.
2.
(closed) Violation 88-01-02 Contrary to 10 CFR 21.6, an inspection of four posting areas indicated that 10 CFR Part 21, Section 206 of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, and the procedures for evaluating and providing notification of deviations were not posted.
The NRC inspectors inspected the posting areas and determined.that all posting requirements were adequately satisfied.
BGM's corrective actions taken to prevent recurrence were adequate and this item is considered closed.
3.
(Closed) Nonconforrrance' 88-01-03 J
o 1
l Contrary to Criterion /II of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and paragraphs NF-2610, HF-2130, and NCA-3867 of Section III of the American Society of MechanicalEngineers(4SME) Code,BCMsuppliedstockmaterialthathadnot been properly upgraded to meet ASME Code requirements. BGH subsequently certified the stock matt. rial as complying with all.ASME Code Requirements.
The NRC inspectors reviewed ASME interpretation III-1-83-206R with the BGM Quality Assurance Manager and determined that the requirements of ASME Code Section III, paragraph NX-2610 were understood and that measures were l
established to ensure proper application of these requirements.
BGM's L
corrective actiuns taken to prevent recurrence were adequate and this item is considered closed.
4.
(Closed)Nonconformance 88-01-04 Contrary to Criterion Vill of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50, paragraph 16.1 of ASTM specification SA-193 and paragraph 11.1 of ASTM specification SA-194, BGM supplied material that was not manufactured by BGM but was identified with the BGM marufacturers' mark "J".
l l
[.
ORGANIZATION: B&G MANUFACTURING COMPANY l,
HATFIELD, PENNSYLVANIA REPORT INSPECTION HO.: 99901108/90-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 3 of 6 The NRC inspectors reviewed the manufacturing marks applied by BGM as a material supplier and determined that the proper i.dentification was used. BGM's corrective actions taken to prevent recurrence were adequate and this item is considered closed.
5.
(Closed)Nonconformance 88-01-05 Contrary to Criterion IV of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and paragraphs NCA-3866.3 and NCA-4134.4 of ASME Code Section 111 BGM did not specify the quality program audited and approved by BGM on P0s to vendors of nuclear quality materials.
The NRC inspectors reviewed statements applied to P0s which required the application of a specific quality program, audited and approved by BGM.
BGM's corrective actions taken to prevent recurrence were adequate and this item is considered closed.
6.
(Closed)Nonconformance 88-01-06 Contrary to Criterion Vill of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50, paragraph 2.3.1 of BGM procedure QAl-122, and paragraph 3.7 of Section 015 of the.
BGM Quality Assurance Nanual (QAM), BGM stored nuclear quality bar stock in an area with non-nuclear quality material and one piece of the material was not color coded as required.
The NRC inspectors reviewed the storage and segregation of nuclear quality materials and determined that all storage conditions observed and all color coded material markings were adequate.
BGM's corrective actions taken to prevent recurrence were adequate and this item is considered closed.
7.
(Closed)Nonconformance 88-01-07 Contrary to Criterion XII of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50, paragraph NCA-3868 of ASME Code Section 111, and paragraphs 3.4.1 and 3.6.1.1 of Section 007 of the QAM, BGM did not have documented evidence of calibration for the heat treating furnace, optical comparators, and hardness tester.
The NRC inspectors determined that the identified equipment had been incorporated into the BGH calibration program.
BGM's correctivo actions taken to prevent recurrence were adequate and this item is considered closed.
8.
(Closed)Nonconformance 88-01-08 Contrary to Criterion VII of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and paragraphs 3.4.1.1, 3.1.1, and 3.1.2.2.1 of Section 008 of the QAM, three of BGM's ven-dors supplying nuclear quality materials or services were not on t5e Approved Vendors List (AVL), one of which had not been audited.
,,,-,,,,,-,,,,i,,,,
ORGANIZATION:
B&G MANUFACTURING COMPANY HATFIELD, PENNSYLVANIA REPORT INSPECTION NO.: 99901108/90-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 4 of 6 The NRC inspectors reviewed the AVL revised February 23, 1989, date issued May 24, 1990, and determined that BGM had issued P0s to only those vendors on the AVL for nuclear quality materials and services.
BGM's corrective actions taken to prevent recurrence were adequate and this item is considered closed.
9.
(Closed)Nonconformance 88-01-09 Contrary to Criterion IX of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50, paragraph NCA-3864.2 and NX-5521 of ASME Code Section Ill, and Sections 9.6 and 9.6.1 of the American Society of Nondestructive Testing (ASNT) Recommended Practice No. SNT-TC-IA, BGM, had not established a written practice, quali-fication records did not contain a statement of training in accordance with a written practice, and the identification or signature of the ASNT Level 111 technician was not on file.
The NRC inspectors determined that BGM had on file a copy of the Laboratory Testing, Inc. (LTl) written practice for training and qualifying nondestruc-tive examination (NDE) personnel, qualification records were adequate, and the ASNT Level 111 technicians certification and signature was on file.
BGM's corrective actions taken to prevent recurrence were adequate and this item is considered closed.
10.
(Closed) Nonconformance 88-01-10 Contrary to Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50, BGH did not have instructions or procedures for tensile and proof testing, hardness measurement, and receipt and final inspection.
The NRC inspectors determined that adequate instructions or procedures for tensile and proof-testing, hardness measurement, and receipt and final inspection had been developed and implemented. BGM's corrective actions
.taken to prevent recurrence were adequate and this item is considered closed.
11.
(Closed) Nonconformance 88-01-11 Contrary to Criterion 11 of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and. paragraph 3.2 of Section 024 of the QAM, the Manager of Nuclear Sales and the Foreman of Packaging / Hardness Testing had not been indoctrinated and trained in the requirements of the quality program.
The NRC inspectors determined that the Manager of Nuclear Sales and the Foreman of Packaging / Hardness Testing had received adequate indoctrination and training.
BGM's corrective actions taken to prevent recurrence were adequate and this item is considered closed.
l
ORGANIZATION:
B&G MANUFACTURING COMPANY HATFIELD, PENNSYLVANIA I
REPORT INSPECTION NO.: 99901108/90-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 5 of 6 12.
(Closed) Nonconformance 88-01-12 Contrary to Criterion XVII of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and paragraphs 3.7.1 and 3.7.1.1 of Section 005 of the QAM, BGM procured safety-related calibration services without the use of a P0 as required.
The NRC inspectors determined that P0s had been used for safety-related items or services.
BGM's corrective actions taken to prevent recurrence were adequate and this item is considered closed.
13.
(Closed)Nonconformance 88-01-13 Contrary to Criterion XVil of Ap)endix B to 10 CFR Part 50, BGM accepted NDE certified reports from LTI t1at did not identify the NDE examiner /
inspector performing magnetic particle and visual examinations for nuclear safety-related orders.
The IRC inspectors determined that NDE reports ~ properly identify the NDE technician performing the examinations. BGM's corrective actions taken to prevent recurrence were adequate and this item is considered closed.
B.
INSPECTION FINDINGS AND COMMENTS:
1.
Entrance and Exit Meetings The NRC inspectors informed the BGM Quality Assurance Manager of the scope of the: inspection, outlined areas of concern, and participated in a plant tour during the entrance meeting.
The NRC inspectors summarized the inspection results and observations to the BGM Quality Assurance Manager during the exit meeting.
===2.
Background===
The previous NRC inspection of BGM was in August 1988, and documented in' Inspection Report No. 99901108/88-01. BGM responded on May 26, 1989 to the NRC Notice of Violation (NOV), dated October 7,1988.
BGM was notified on June 16, 1989 by NRC that the BGM reply was responsive to the concerns raised in the NOV and that implementation of BGM's corrective actions will be reviewed during a future inspection.
BGM responded on July 28, 1989 to the NRC Notice of Nonconformance (NON),
dated October 7,1988.
BGM was notified on November 15, 1989 by NRC that several of BGM's responses did not adequately address the concerns raised in the NON.
This inspection was initiated to review the implementation of BGM's corrective actions taken in response to the NOV and NON, dated October 7, 1988, and to review any. additional responses.
I m
ORGANIZATION:
B&G MANUFACTURING COMPANY HATFIELD, PENNSYLVANIA REPORT INSPECTION NO.: 99901108/90-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 6 of F, 3.
Corrective Actions The NRC inspectors reviewed the corrective actions taken by BGM in re-s sonse to the NOV and NON, dated October 7,1988, and issued pursuant to tie inspection documented in Inspection Report No. 99901108/88-01. The specific corrective actions taken and the results of the NRC inspectors' review during this inspection are described in Section A. " Status of Previous Inspection Findings," of this report. All findings of violation or nonconformance were reviewed and the corresponding corrective actions were determined to be adequate.
Documents reviewed during the course of this inspection were:
BGM's response to NRC, dated August 29, 1990 AVL issued May 24, 1990
" Quality Assurance Instruction," QAl-125,
SUBJECT:
10 CFR Part 21, Revised May 25, 1989 Ingersoll Rand P0 No. 542854H, dated February 2,1990, to BGM for SA-193 B8M studs, ASME Code Section III, Class 3 Niagra fastener PO No. 20418, dated May 7,1990, to BGM for SA-193 B7 bolts and SA-194 GR 7 nuts, ASME Code Section III, Class 1 GPE Controls PO No. 10947, dated May 9, 1990, to BGM for SA-193 B7 bolts, ASME Code Section III, Class 2 The NRC inspectors reviewed BGM's procurements-of machining and other special processes from vendors supplying BGM.
No findings or concerns were observed during-this.part of the inspection.
C.
PERSONNEL-CONTACTED:
James Sands, Manager Quality Assurance 1
p l
1 tf
.,