Text

Rev 0 to Engineering Evaluation Rept 91-0450, Unit 2 Svc Operability
	ML20056D598
Person / Time
Site:	Brunswick
Issue date:	12/03/1991
From:	Bishop S, Casey M, Prater G; CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:	;
Shared Package
ML20056D596	List: BSEP-93-0126, Forwards Response to NRC 930803 RAI Re SWS License Amend Request Submitted on 921231 & Suppl by; ML20056D597; ML20056D598; ML20056D600; ML20056D601;
References
	91-0450, 91-0450-R00, 91-450, 91-450-R, NUDOCS 9308170130
	Download: ML20056D598 (91)
	v • d • e

{{#Wiki_filter:_ - _ _ _ - ENCLOSURE 3 BRUNSWICK STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 NRC DOCKET NOS. 50-325 & 50-324 OPERATING Li'JENSE NOS. DPR-71 & DPR-62 REQUEST FOR LICENSE AMENDMENT SERVICE WATER SYSTEM EER 91-0450 UNIT 2 SERVICE WATER OPERABILITY l l ) l E3-1 9308170130 930809 l PDR ADDCK 05000324 P PDR i

~ + t-t +~ -- V Nh )( y (glU$

T:-

r . ::cz. x.sar r.wa.cs,:;; Lh "" * *==- " '-'=%"- sun EER No. 9I'04 f 0 ENGINEERING EVALUATION Rev. No. O REPORT Page No. I 1. Reference ACR, LER, k'R/JO, etc. A File No. 40(o O l 2. Brief description of ipem/ activity didh Z beMc e )(, Class A (Q-List) tAMb vperabihtu O Class B-3 (FP-Q) O Other 3. Disposition )K a. Use/ acceptable as is i O b. Permanent repair / rework Qp C c. Temporary change; Expiration date O Temporary repair (2y C Temporary condition ( $ r; O OA/STSI (O Preliminary) -- y O d. Other l 4 Final Resolution { K Complies with FSAR, design, drawing, code, and quality a. requirements. O b. Acceptable deviation frem FSAR, design, drawing. code, or quality requirements. Safety review (AI-109) required. l, _.m 5. Follow-up Requirements -~ " ~, " + c a. Surveillance activities, responsible group (s) O b. Action items, tasponsible group (s) F6 c. None 0 T 6. Review / Approval dg, 4 y/so/v ,'C Responsible Engineer *///Mla/TA _ J/A/ Date //40 9/ i h [Yes O No Technical Review

b d

Date /2dM/ (( Engineering Supervisor //8M/// Date M h / O Yes 'X No EQ Review _ A/A I Date FIA X Yes C No QA Review M Date M f M / O Yes K No ANII Review A Date fl A O Yes.)( No NAD Review A[d Date e[ A D Yes KNo PNSC Review t/A / Date llA i Approved X,,8 Date I Y [ 7. Distribution: I h Document Control (EER File) Other: NED BESS Section Manager Manager - Maintenance Supervisor - ISI Responsible Engineer

Qualified Technical j

Q-List /EDBS Coordinator - PEG Reviewer if Quality Operations Principal Engineer Class A and box 4b Nuclear Engineering Department (NED-Raleigh) checked Specialist - Regulatory Compliance NED EQ Croup - Ralei h S EDC - Technical Supporr j QA Engineering BSEP/Vol. XX/ENP-12 20 Rev. 28 { l

P 'i l. ENGINEERING EVALUATION EER No. 91-0450 i REVISION No. O l.' PAGE No. 2 l i 1 l l LIST OF EFFECTTVE PACES ? l. l PAGE REVISION i 1-14 0 1 I 1 a l l l e l l l 1 _. a

ENGINEERING EVALUATION EER No. 91-0450 REVISION No. O ^ PAGE No. 3 i b TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE TRAVELER 1 i LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES. 2 i TABLE OF CONTENTS................. 3 1.0 EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

4 2.0 PROBLEM DESCRIPTION 4 3.0 EVALUATION

SUMMARY

4 4.0 EVALUATION 4 I 4.1 Review of Data 4 4.2 Adjustments to KYPIPE Model. 8 4.3 Comparison of Test and Model Data 9 4.4 Conclusions................ 14 5.0 ACTION ITEMS i 14

6.0 REFERENCES

14 s 7.0 ATTACHMENTS LIST......... 14 l l l l J

l ENGINEERING EVALUATION EER No. 91-0450 RIVISION No. O PROBLEM EVALUATION PAGE No. 4 1.0 EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

Data f rom the Service Water System hydraulic PT for Unit 2 outage B210R1 l vas analyzed by NED and the system was determined to be within the system design basis for operability. 2.0 PROBLEM DESCRIPTION Performance ?est 2-PT-24.6.4. " Service Water System Hydraulic Performance Test " was completed on November 26, 1991, for the Unit 2 outage B210RI. The purpose of this test is to demonstrate the Service Water System (SWS) is hydraulically capable of meeting the design basis flow requirements to safety related components. The purpose of this evaluation is to analyze the data collected by the PT and determine if system capabilities are within the design basis. 3.0 EVALUATION

SUMMARY

The data produced by the PT was first reviewed for consistency, Questionable data was identified and discussed with test personnel. i A review of similar data from past PT's was made. Reasonable explanations of inconsistencies were derived and appropriate adjustments and-allowances were made. The appropriate system configuration was then simulated with the KYPIPE model for the Unit 2 SWS and the model results were compared to the test data. Several minor adjustments were made to improve the accuracy of the model. Comparisons showed that, with certain exceptions, the model's predictions agreed with the data within the 5% tolerance fer the model. Explanations for the exceptions (see Section 4.1) were judged to i be reasonable. The model was then run for the appropriate limiting cases for design basis events. The appropriate cases were determined by reviews of Calc. G0050A-12 and the revisions made to the Unit 2 SWS-model (see Section 4.2). Evaluation of the results concluded that the Unit 2 Service Water System is within the system design basis for operability. The following sections explain the steps in this evaluation in detail. 4.0 EVALUATION 4.1 Review of Data Since there were only minor modifications and some maintenance work (see details below) on the SWS, the PT results were expected to closely agree with the existing KYPIPE model for Unit 2. The data was reviewed and the model predictions were found to be consistent with the exceptions described below. 4.1.1 Modifications and Maintenance i There were no piping modifications to the SWS during this outage. The RHR Pump Seal Coolers were replaced with direct replacements of the same size and type under preventive maintenance route numbers 91-RFK-381 and 91-RFL-381. Maintenance work on the service water piping for the diesel generators was performed to I remove clam shells and fouling. The 18" header and approximately 75% of the 6" piping for DG #3 were hydrolased. The 6" piping for

7 ENGZNEERING EUALUATION EER No. 91-0450 PROBLEM EVALUATION REVISION No. O PACE No. 5 DG #4 was flushed for a total of two days. All equipment coolers-and heat exchangers were inspected and cleaned as deemed necessary. Both nuclear pump motors were rebuilt by CE.in 1989. Nuclear pump 1A was rebuilt this outage and put in service in November, 1991. Nuclear pump 2B has not been rebuilt recently. 4.1.2 Nuclear Service Water Pump Flows The nuclear service water pump flow measurements did not match as would normally be expected (see table below). The pumps are essentially identical and the discharge strainer differential pressures did not differ greatly. The performance of the pumps would have been expected to be close. However, nuclear pump 2A was recently rebuilt and nuclear pump 2B has been in service for some time which could mean that there is a noticeable difference between the two pumps. The following information will demonstrate that the pumps are essentially identical and the indicated pump flow differences are not reliable. TABLE 1 - PUMP FLOW DATA COMPARED TO SYSTEM FLOW DATA FOR 2-PT-24.6.4 PUMP PT DATA SYSTEM PT DATA FLOW FLOW STEP PUMP EST'D. TOTAL DIFF= pggp 23: PUMP 2B DIFF. FLOW NUC. SYSTEM X-HDR. SYSTEM SYSTEM NO. BTWEEN TOTAL HEADER FLOW LKG.8 FLOW -PUMP FLOW PRESS FLOW PRESS PUMPS PRES.2 TOTAL TOTA 1. 9.3.29 5700 58 4610 61 1090 10310 63 10550 =120 10670 360 9.3.33 5940 58 4620 60 1320 10560 61 10340 =110' 10450 -110 9.3.42. 5940 57 4600 60 1340 10540 62 10250 =400 10650 110 i NOTES: 1. Data taken from Data Sheet 3, Att. 7.3. 2. Data taken from Data Sheets 1 and 2. Att. 7.3. System flow total { i includes estimated 150 gpm for the RHRSW Pump Motor Coolers.not i measured by this PT. 3. Cross header leakage estimates are based on the calibrated KYPIPE model. A similar mismatch was noticed for the previous Unit 1 PT. 1 PT-24.6.4 Further tests were conducted on Unit 1 (SP-91-006) which found that, when run individually, both pumps performed equally well and approximately equal to their pump curve. The differences for Unit I were attributed to different losses in the pump discharge strainers and inaccuracies in the installed and test instrumentation. EER 91-0039 for Unit I concluded that the Contro1otron flow readings for the nuclear service water pumps l were inaccurate and not to be relied on for this test. I For the Unit 2 PT, the strainer differential pressures are not a significant contributing factor to different flow rates because their differences are small. However, as shown in the results of l SP 91-006 for Unit 1, there are significant inaccuracies to be 1

ENGINEERING EVALUATION i EER No. 91-0450 REVISION No. O PROBLEM EVALUATION PAGE No. 6 expected for the Controlotron instrument readings. The only I available location for the Contro1otron instruments is not a good location. The turbulence and the vertical pipe contribute to non-uniform flows and inaccurate readings. A review of the ISI data (Att. 7.8) taken on November 15, 1991, for the Unit 2 nuclear pumps after the 2A nuclear pump was put in service shows that both pumps are operating very close to each other. This data was taken with each pump operating individually at 5600 gpm. The flow reading is based-on the flow orifice for the RBCCW which is an established and reliable flow measurement point. The resulting pressure readings are within I psi of each other. This is a reliable indication that the two pumps are operating on essentially the same curve. The pump vendor conducted a pump performance test for the rebuilt pump and produced a pump performance curve. The ISI test data does not appear to agree with the vendor's performance curve. However, since the ISI test data was taken on site after the pump. was installed, it is considered to be the most applicable to this evaluation. The individual pump flow measurements are not significant for this evaluation. As shown in Table 1, the total for the pump flows agrees within 3.5% of the total for the system flows. The close agreement of the total system flows, with the fact that Unit 1 testing for a similar mismatch determined there was no problem with the pumps, and the ISI testing data that shows.the two pumps are on the same curve, are sufficient for considering the measured pump flow differences to be invalid. Therefore, the differences in the nuclear pump flows may be discounted for this evaluation.

ENGINEERING EVALUAZION EER No. 91-0450 PROBLEM EVALUATION REVISION No. O PAGE No. 7 4.1.3 Diesel Generator #4 Flow for Step 9.3.29 The flow measured for Diesel Generator #4 in Step 9.3.29 appears to be extraordinarily high. No flow measurement for any DG in any previous test has been nearly this high. This measurement also does not appear to be in proportion to the flows measured in the other steps.* Since there was no change in the DG supply configuration in any of these steps it would be expected that the flow would change in proportion to the change for DG #3. On questioning test personnel about this inconsistency, it was found that the test setup for DG #4 was reset after the first step because of questionable initial readings for step 9.3.33. This provides reason to believe that the reading for DG #4 in step _ 9.3.29 was inaccurate. For purposes of this evaluation, a new flow quantity will be established for this data point based on the flow relationship between DG #3 and DG #4 in the other steps. TABLE 2: DIESEL GENERATOR FLOWS

STEP NO.

DG #3 FLOW DG #4 FLOW FROPORTION NEW DG#4 FLOW 9.3.29 1496 19362 8 0.89 1330 9.3.33 1362 1253 0.92 NA 9.3.42 1365 1172 0.86 NA NOTES: 1. Data taken from Data Sheet 2, Att. 7.3. 2. DG #4 flow data for step 9.3.29 is apparently incorrect. 3. Proportion for step 9.3.29 is the average of the proportions for steps 9.3.33 and 9.3.42. 4.1.4 Diesel Generator Flow Balance When comparing the two DG flows, the flow balance shows that DG #3 I flows are approximately 10% higher than DG #4 flows. However, the l nodel predicts that DG #4 would have flows approximately 10% higher than DG #3. The hydraulic balance of the model was based on testing completed in 1989. This balance would be affected by changes in the resistance of the flow paths for the DG's. The resistance would have been significantly changed by the maintenance described earlier. The resultant change in the flow balance is consistent with the maintenance performed. The majority of the flow path to DG #3 was hydrolased which would have reduced the flow restrictions and increased the flow rate. No hydrolasing was accomplished for-DG #4. The flushing that was performed would not be expected to cause as great a reduction in the flow resistance. Therefore, it is concluded that this change in the flow balance is consistent with changes in the flow paths. Note that the testing showed that the total flow to the DG's was . essentially unchanged. 1

ENGINEERING EVAlbATION EER No. 91-0450 PROBLEM EVALUATION RIVISION No. O PAGE No. 8 4.2 Adjustments to KYPIPE Model The existing Unit 2 SWS KYPIPE model, Calc. G0050A-12, was used to simulate the SWS configurations tested during PT-24.6.4. The initial results pointed out several areas which could be revised to provide better agreement with the PT data. These areas and the changes incorporated into the Unit 2 model are discussed in the following sections. 4.2.1 "B" Loop Vital Header Flow The existing model over predicted "B" loop flow approximately 10%. To provide a better match to actual field conditions, the K factor for the supply line to the "B" loop was increased to reduce "B" loop vital header flow. 4.2.2 Diesel Generator Flows The existing model shows DG #4 as the higher flow DG. Since test data shows the flows to DG's 3 & 4 are almost exactly reversed from the model predictions, the model has been revised to show DG

3 as the DG with the higher flow.

This was accomplished by simply switching the K factors for DG's 3 & 4 in the model. An important note is that total flow through these two DG's has hardly changed at all based on the PT data. 4.2.3 NSWP Discharge Line Differential Pressure I { The existing model predicts less friction loss between the NSWP strainer discharge and the NSW header than was indicated by the test data. Accordingly, the K factors for lines 3 and 6 have been increased to more closely approximate the actual differential pressure in the field. 4.2.4 Other Adjustments Other adjustments made to the existing Unit 2 model are specific i to the test configurations (bay level, strainer DP, cross-header leakage, etc.) and are varied according to actual test data. a i

e ENGINEERZNG EUALUATION EER No. 91-0450 PROBLDi EVALUATION REVISION No. O PAGE No. 9 l l 4.3 Comparison of Test and Model Data 1 i The final calibrated Unit 2 SWS model is "U2CALEN2". This model includes the changes discussed above in Section 4.2. As can be seen from the following table, the revised model generally provides agreement with test data within the 5% tolerance currently utilized. The diesel I generator flows vary as much as 6% but have an overall average less than 5%. Since the DG's receive much more flow than required this greater variation is acceptable. Therefore, the file "U2CALEN2" is considered to be acceptable for analysis of the U2 SWS. l TABLE 3-COMPARISON OF FLOW DATA FROM 2-PT-24.6.4 TEST AND CALIBRATED KYPIPE MODEL "U2CALEN2" (All flows in gpm) STEP 9.3.29 STEP 9.3.33 STEP 9.3.42 COMPONENT TEST MODEL TEST MODEL TEST MODEL l NSWPs 2A & 2B 10310 10505 10560 10483 10540 10725 Combined Flow SW Lube Water 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 DG #3 SW 1496 1408 1362 1400 1365 1386 DG #4 SW 13302 1258 1253 1251 1172 1238 RBCCW SW 3500 3500 3500 3500 3500 3500 i RHR SW A Loop 3000 3000 0 0 3000 3000 RERSW Pu=p A 79 0 0 79 Motor Cooler' RHRSW Pump C 72 0 0 70 Motor Cooler' RER SW B Loop 0 0 3000 3000 0 0 RHRSW Pump B 0 0 Motor Cooler' 81 0 0 i RHRSW Pump D 0 0 i Motor Cooler' 78 0 0 VITAL HDR - 520 516 520 513 510 507 A LOOP VITAL HDR - 555 553 530 547 550 543 4 B LOOP CROSS HEADER 118 113 402 LEAKAGEd NOTES: 1. Service Water Lube Water was supplied by Unit I for this test. 2. See Section 4.1.3 for derivation of the flow value for DG #4 in step 9.3.29. 3. These values were not measured by the PT. 4 Assumption for cross header Icakage K-factor was based on a review of the test data.

i ENGINEERING EVALUATION EER No. 91-0450 REVISION No. O PROBLEM EVALUATION PAGE No. 10 t i File "U2CALEN2* was used to create a new master file for U2, "U2MASTR1' which incorporated the conservative K-f actor for cross header leakage currently used in Calc. G0050A-12. This master was then used to create "U2SCNRIO," which was used to examine the impact of the changes on performance of the SWS during limiting DBA's. Since the changes to the model actually result in an increase in the total system resistance, all maximum flow cases would result in less pump flow and therefore are considered to be acceptable. However, the minimum pump flow and component cooling cases must be examined to ensure the greater resistance does not cause an unacceptable decrease in flow.. The most limiting DBA cases are taken from Calculation G0050A-12 and are listed below. TABLE 4 WORST CASE ACCIDENT SCENARIOS: FILE NAMES BAY LEVEL ELEVATION FILE NAME & CHANGE NOs. Low -6.0' U2@ POWER Change 4 (Component cooling) U2NOPOWR Change 4 (Component cooling) Extreme Low -8.63' U2TYFOON Change 6 (Minimum flow) U2TYFOON Change 2 (Component coolinR) The minimum allowable pu=p flow is 1500 gpm. As can be seen from the results for minimum pump flow (U2SCNRIO Change 0, Att. 7.5), the minimum predicted flow is 1812 gpm. With an allowance of 5% for model accuracy, the minimum pump flow predicted is 1722 gpm. The results of the three component cooling cases are also acceptable as shown by data in Tables 5, 6, and 7.

l ENGINEERING EVALUATION EER No. 91-0450 REVISION No. O PROBLEM EVALUATION PAGE No. 11 TABLE 5! COMPARISON OF AFTER 10 MINUTE HEAT EXCHANGER FLOWS: KYPIPE WORST-CASE SCENARIO FLOWS VERSUS MINIMUM HEAT EXCHANGER FLOWS FOR f U2SCNRIO. CHANCE 1 MODES 1.2.3 LOW WATER LEVEL l (all flows in gpm) KYPIPE 95% OF KYPIPE HEAT EXCHANGER HEAT EXCHANGER OUTPUT FLOW OUTPUT FLOW REQUIRED FLOW S i SW Lube Wate-124 118 95 DG 1 SW 78B 749 350 DG 2 SW 815 774 350 DG 3 SW 889 j 845 3$0 i DG 4 SW 852 809 350 RHR (A Loop) L 4850 4608 4500 RHRSW Pump A 60 57 38 Motor Cooler RHRSW Pump.C 54 51 3B Motor Cooler Vital Header - 393 373 233 2 A Loop 1 Vital Header - 422 401 233 B Loop: RHR Pump Room 316 300 186 Cooler A CS Pump Room 51 48 47 Cooler A RHR Pump Seal 26 25 0 Coolers A & C RHR Pump Room 331 314 186 Cooler B CS Pu=p Room 63 60 47 Cooler B RER Pump Seal 28 27 0 Coolers B & D NOTES: 1. All minimum flow requirements assume 90*F Service Water. 2. Vital header minimum flow requirements established from previously accepted minimum flows for the vital header components.

i I ENGINEERING EVALUATION { EER No. 91-0450 l PROBLEM EVALUATION REVISION No. 0 1 PACE No. 12 [ TABLE 6! COMPARISON OF AFTER 10 MINUTE HEAT EXCHANCER FIDWS: TJPIPE WORST-CASE SCENARIO FLOWS VERSUS MINIMUM HEAT EXCHANCER FLOWS FOR U2SCNRIO, CHANGE 2: MODES 4,5 IDW WATER LEVEL (all flows in gpm) KYPIPE 95% OF KYPIPE HEAT EXCHANGER HEAT EXCHANGER OUTPUT FLOW OUTPUT FLOW REQUIRED FLOW 8 SW Lube Water 113 107 95 DC 1 SW 590 561 350 DG 2 SW 600 570 350 DG 3 SW 626 595 350 DG 4 SW 614 583 350 RHR (B Loop) 2635 2503 2500 RHRSW Pump B 63 60 38 Motor Cooler RHRSW Pump D 60 57 38 Motor Cooler Vital Header - 395 375 233 2 A Loop I Vi al eader - 420 399 233 RHR Pu=p Room 318 302 186 Cooler A CS Pump Room 51 48 47 Cooler A RHR Pump Seal 26 25 0 Coolers A & C RHR Pump Room 330 314 186 j Cooler B CS Pump Room 63 60 47 Cooler B RER Pu=p Seal 28 27 0 Coolers B & D l NOTES: 1. All minimum flow requirements assume 90*F Service Water. 2. Vital header minimum flow requirements established from previously accepted minimum flows for the vital header components.

ENGINEERING EVALUATION EER No. 91-0450 PROBLEM EVALUATION REVISION No. O PAGE No. 13 TAEu 7i COMPARISON OF AFTER 10 MINUTE HEAT EXCHANGER FLOWS: KYPIPE WORST-CASE SCENARIO FIDWS VERSUS MINIMUM HEAT EXCHANGER FLOWS FOR U2SCNRIO, CHANGE 3: MODES 4,5 EITREME LOW WATER LEVEL (all flows in gpm) KYPIPE 95% OF KYPIPE HEAT EXCHANGER HEAT EXCHANGER OUTPUT FLOW OUTPUT FLOW REQUIRED FLOW 1 SW Lube Water 113 107 95 DG 1 SW8 350 8 DC 2 SW 350 DG 3 SW 1111 1055 350 DG 4 SW 993 943 350 RHR (A Loop) 2800 2660 2500 RHRSW Pump A 62 59 38 Motor Cooler RHRSW Pump C 60 57 38 Motor Cooler Vital Header - 398 378 233 A Loop

Vital Header -

424 403 233 2 B Loop 1 RHR Pump Room 321 305 186 Cooler A CS Pump Room 51 48 47 Cooler A RHR Pu=p Seal 26 25 0 Coolers A & C RER Pump Room 332 315 186 Cooler B CS Pump Room 63 60 47 Cooler B RHR Pump Seal 28 27 0 Coolers B & D NOTES: 1. All minimum flow requirements assume 90*F Service Water. 2. Vital header minimum flow requirements established from previously accepted minimum flows for the vital header components. 3. Diesel Generators 1 and 2 are supplied by Unit 1 under this scenario. i

ENGINEERING EVALUATICI4 EER No. 91-0450 PROBLEM EVALUATION REVISION No. O PAGE No. 14 4.4 Conclusions Based on the above discussion, "U2MASTR1* accurately represents the Unit 2 SWS (with the exception of the assumed K-factors used for conservative cross header leakage estimates) and can be used for all U2 design analyses. Subsequent U2 files generated from 'U2MASTR1" for the appropriate worst case scenarios show that all required heat exchanger flows will be provided. The model also shows that pump flows will remain above the minimum pump flow required. The maximum pump flow cases are bounded by previous model predictions since the changes to the model added more resistance to the system. This evaluation concludes that the Service Water System remains within its design basis and is fully capable of performing its safety related function. Therefore, based on the data from the performance test 2-PT-24.6.4 completed on November 26, 1991, the Unit 2 Service Water System is confirmed as fully operable. 5.0 ACTION ITEMS No corrective actions, acceptance testing, or Action Item notifications are required by this EER. However, it is noted that the inconsistencies between individual pump flow measurements have been difficult to resolve for this EER and for EER 91-0039. It is recommended that BNP Technical Support and NED work to improve the system measurements so that this situation is not repeated each time this PT is performed. Because this recommendation is not a system operability concern, it is not being assigned as an action item.

6.0 REFERENCES

6.1 Technical Specification Interpretation TSI 90-03, Rev. 0 6.2 Calculation G0050A-12, Rev. 3, BSEP Unit 2 Service Water System Operating Limits 6.3 i Service Water System Hydraulic Analysis Report For BSEP Units 1 & 2, dated 12/28/89 6.4 EER 91-0039, Rev. O, " Evaluation of Service Water Design Basis Capability" (for Unit 1) 6.5 SP-91-006, Unit 1 Special Procedure, " Nuclear Service Water Pump Performance Verification 6.6 2-PT-24.1-2, Service Water Pump and Discharge Valve Operability Test 6.7 2-PT-24.6.4, Service Water System Hydraulic Performance Test 7.0 ATTACHMENTS LIST 7.1 10CTR50.59 Safety Review 7.2 Environmental Qualification Impact Form 7.3 2-PT-24.6.4 Data,11/26/91 (19 pages) 7.4 Analysis Results for 'U2CALEN2" (9 pages) 7.5 Analysis Results for "U2SCNRIO" (12 pages) 7.6 Data File for 'U2CALBN2" (12 pages)- 7.7 Data File for 'U2SCNRIO' (12 pages) 7.8 ISI Pump Performance Lo NUC-SW pumps (2 pages) g from 2-PT-24.1-2 for 2A-NUC-SW and 2B-

EER No. 91-0450 REVISION No. 0 AITACEMENT 2 (Cone'd) Att. 7.1, Leb 26/ft / REVISION 2 10CFR50.59 PROGRAM MANUAL page 59 ATTAGD.IENT A CP&L SAFETY REVIEW PACKAGE Page I of T SAFETY REVIEW COVER SHEET DOCUMENT NO. E69 Cl1-045D REV. NO. O DESCRIPHON OF1TTLE: Ow'it Z. S e.v vice ldaier-OFe.rn b, i, b 1. Assigned Responsibilities: 64rru LU. rahW-Safety Analysis P.ww. Lead 1st Safety Reviewen 6 arm to. rra ver 2nd Safety Reviewen Oewo'( i vee 2. Safety Analysis P=pamn Ce piem PARTI. SAFETY ANALYSIS Safety Analysis P=pa=r % /d. g[Z4 / / SIGNATURE ~DXTE~ 3. Lead 1st Safe:v Revtewen Complete Pm IL Item Classificanon. Lead 1st Safety Reviewen Pm III may be compie=d. If either quescon 1 or 2 is 'yes.' A then Part IV is not requt=d. 5. Lead 1st Safety Reviewen Determine which DISCIPLINES are equirec formvtew of this j item (including own) and marr the appropnme blockts) below. DISCIPLTNES Recuimi (Pst Name) SitmaramDate f Sten 71 0 NuclearPlant Ooerations 0 NucicarEnginedring ,t J Mechaniml Cvcru u>. Fra +w sa.- M /rm' <</ra[q f 0 Elec=tcal / 0 Instr =nentation & Control 0 Scue=ral 0 Metallurgy 0 Nmiey/ Radiochemistry 0 Heahh Physics O Adminimative Cont:cis 6. A QUALIFIED SAFETY REVIEWER will be assigned for each DISCIPLINE marred in step 5 and his/her name printed in the space provided. Each person listed shall p= form a SAFETY REVIEW and provide input into the Safety Review Pnch ge. 1 7. The Lead 1st Safety Reviewer will assure that a Part III or Part IV is completed (see step 4 above) and a Part VI if required (see 9.b of Pan ID. Each person listed in sten 5 shall sign and date next to his/her name in step 5, incicanng completion of a SAFETY REVIEW. 8. 2nd Safety Reviewen Perfonn a SAFETY REVIEW in accordance with Section 8.0. 2nd Safety Reviewer O a 8,4~~i Date id2/* DISCIPLINE: MFry .Tu 9. PNSC myiew required? If "yes" nrrnch Part V and mark reason belowt 0 0 Potendal UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION O Quesnon 9 of PartIV answered "Yes" 0 Other(specify): 0 AI-109 Rev. 001 Page 75 of 87 l

EER No. 91-0450 REVISION No. O ATTACHMENT 2 (Cont'd) Att. 7.1, h'4). ulz u(<, REVISION 2 10CFR50.59 PROGRAM MANUAL Page 60 ATTACHMENTA CP&L SAFETY REVEW PACKAGE Page 2 9 of PARTI: SAFETY ANALYSIS (See msuuctions in Section 8.4.1) (Anaca addi:ional sheets as necessary) DOCUMENT NO. EEA 9l-045D REV. NO. O DESCRIFUON OF CHANGE: b Md ANALYSIS: b= a M

REFERENCES:

CE cb 0 AI-109 Rev. 001 Page 76 of 87 l

= ENGINEERING IVALUATION EER No. 91-0450 REVISION No. 0 l SAFETY ANALYSIS Att. 7.1, Page No. 3 of 9 PART I: SAFETY ANALYSIS, Attached

== Description:== This EER analyzes and evaluates the data taken by 2-PT-24.6.4 on 11/26/91. The purpose is to determine if any modification, maintenance, j or equipment degradation has affected the Service Water System so that it can no longer be assured of meeting its safety related functions. The design basis parameters required to meet the safety related i functions have been previously identified in Calculation G0050A-12, Rev. 3. l l This evaluation uses the data taken from the PT to recalibrate the previously verified hydraulic analysis KYPIPE Program model for the Service Water System. The calibrated model was then used to run several vorst case accident scenarios. The results of these scenarios were compared with the allowable limits for the Service Water System (the allowed nuclear service water pump flows and the required diesel generator flows for the 0-10 minute phase of a design basis accident; and the required component heat exchanger flows for the after 10 minute phase). This comparison verified that the system is capable of operating within the design basis limitations and supplying the required design basis component cooling flows. i Analysis: This EER has concluded that the Service Water System is within the design basis and is fully capable of meeting its safety related function. All credible failure modes have been analyzed and documented in Calc. G0050A-12. This evaluation shows that the SWS remains within the maximum and minimum flow limitations documented by G0050A-12. Since no changes are proposed and the system remains within the design basis l requirements, there is no safety impact for this EER.

References:

1. Tech. Spec. 3/4.7.1.2 i 2. TSI 90-03, Rev. O 3. BSEP FSAR Chapters 9 & 15 4. Calculation C0050A-12. Rev. 3 l i l l l 1 l l l l l l

EER No. 91-0450 ATTACHMENT 2 (Cont'd) Att. 7.1,

W %

REVISION 2 10CFR50.59 PROGRAM hMNUAL i Page 61 i ATTACHMElfrA CP&L SAFn'TY REVIEW PACKAGE Page 4 of 9 PART H: ITEM CLASSIFICATION DOCUMENTNO. 66 fv Cf I -04 SD REV.NO. O Y.n SD. 1. Does dis item represent: A change to the facility as desenbed in the SAFETY 0 ft a. ANALYSIS REPORT? b. A change to de c:ocedu=s as cesenbed in the SAFETY 0 R ANALYSIS REPORT? A test or execnment not cesenced in tne SAPETY U R ANALYSIS REPORT? 2. Does this item involve a change to the individual plant Operanng 0 g License or to its Technical Spect5 canons? 3. Does this item requut a revision to de PSAR? O 1K a. Does this item involve a enange to se Offsite Dose Calculation U ')k Manual? 5. Does this item constitute a change to the Process Contml PIngram? [] IK 6. Does this item involve a major change to a Radwaste Tresunent U 1 System? 7. Does this item involve a cnange to de Technical Spect5 canon 0 'K Equipment List? 3. Does dis item impact the NPDES Penmt (all 3 sites) or constimte [] R an "unreviewed enytronmental question" (SHNPP Environmental Plan. Section 3.1) or a "signiscant environmental impact" (BSEP)? 9. Does this item involve a change to a previously accepted: Quality Assurance Pmigua 0 8 a. b. Security Plan (incinding Tmining, Qnnhfication, and 0 Ik Contingency Plans)? c. hssy Plan? O E EM- %t Spent Fuel Storage inmHadan hcense? (If"yes," 0 X d. refer to Scenon 8.4.2, " Question 9 ~ for special considemnons. Complete Pan VIin accordance with Secnon 8.4.6) SEE SECTION 8.4.2 FOR INSTRUCHONS FOR EACH "YES" ANSWEP-REFERENCES. List FSAR and Tecimical Sp-hdan idctcuces used to answer questions 1-9 above. Idennfy specine reference senm used for any "Yes" answer. Eh % c. '*/4. 7. /. 2- %z 'w -o 2 MAK Cha/Htm '1 e16 0 AI-109 Rev. 001 Page 77 of 87

l; EER No. 91-0450 REVISION No. 0 ATTACHKENT 2 (Cont'd) 7.1, Fas N. Att. L l "/zc/fl i REVISION 2 10CFR50.59 PROGRAM MANUAL Fire 62 I l A~ITACHMENT A ~ CP&L SAFETY REVIEW PACKAGE Page 5 of 9 l l PART III: UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DETERMINATION SCREEN DOCUMENT NO. 66E 3 /-04 SO REV.NO. O h1 h Is this enange f;11x acdressen by another completed 0 l UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION determmation? (See Secnons 7.2.1. 7 ' ' *, and 7.9.1.1) REFERENCE DOCUMENT: REV. h1 h i For procenures. is tne change a non-intent change which calg (cheer D g l di that apply): (See Scenen 7.2.2.3) O Corrects typogmphical errors which do not aher the meaning or intent of the proced=t: or, O Adds or = vises steps for clarincanon (provided they are consistent with the enginal pmpose or applicability of the procedurch or, l 0 Changes the title of an orgam:tational position: or, O Changes names, addresses. or telephone numbers of persons: or. 1 0 Changes the designanon of an item of equipment whem the equipment is the same as tne original eqmpment or is an authorir.ed replacement or, a Changes a specined tool or instrument to an equivalent substitute: or. O Changes the format of a procedure without altering the meaning, mtent, or content or i 0 Deletes a part or all of a procedme, the deleted portions of which are wholly coveted by approved plant procedmes? j I If the answer to either Question 1 or Question 2 in PART III is "Yes," then PART IV need not be completed. l 0 AI-109 Rev. 001 Page 78 of 87 .l

EER No. 91-0450 i REVISION No. O ATIACHKENT 2 (Cont'd) 7.1, LpA~f "/nh/ Att. REVISION 2 10CFR50.59 PROGRAM MANUAL Page 63 t ATTACHMENTA CP&L SAFETY REVIEW PACKAGE Page b of 3 PARTIV: CNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DETERMINATION DOCUMENTNO. 868-9/-o45 D REV. NO. O Using me S AFETY ANALYSIS developed for the change. test or experiment. as well as oder momred refemnces (LINNSING BASIS DOCUMENTATION. Design Drawings, Design Basis Documents. coces. e:c.). the creparer of the Unmviewed Safety Quesnan Determmadon must directly answer eacn of de following seven quesnons and make a dete:Tnmanon of whether an LN*ED SAFETY QUES ~nON ensts. ~ A WRUTEN BASIS IS REQUIRED FOR EACH ANSWER .Yn En May tne crocosec =nvity inc=ase the procability of occ==nce of Q R =1 ace: cent evaluatec pmytously in the SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT? r% ctAAnc uch .i 2. May the proposed acdvity increase the consecuences of an accident U J-evaluated previ n tr ALYSIS REPORT? 3. May the pmposed =dvity increase the probability of occ=mnce of 0 a malfuncnon of eculpment imporunt to safety evaluated previously in the SAFEIT AN YSIS REPORT? .,o - ecCCL c - May the pmposed acdvity increase the consequence of a O g 4 malfunecen of equipment important to safety evn1=M previously in the SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT? % at6Aj 5. May the pmposed activity creare the possibility of an ac+t of a 0 different type than any evaluated previousiv in the SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT? 4e O AI-109 Rev. 001 Page 79 of 87 l

EER No. 91-0450 ATTACHMENT 2 (Cone'd) Att. 7.1, Y.'f4lG) REVISION 2 10CFR50.59 PROGRAM MANUAL Page 64 A'ITACHhENT A CP&L SAPETY REVIEWPACKAGE Page 7 of T PARTIV: (Continued) X.;1 En i May the proposed acavity cr-~ de possibility of a malfuncnon of D K equipment important to san:ty of a different type than any evaluated previously in SIS REPORT? Does the proposed acavity reduce the margm of safety as defined in 0 X de basis of any Technical Spe=fication? %- Md' 3. Bases on the answers to cuesnons 1 - 7, does this item result in an 0 UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION? If de answer to any of the questions 1-7 is "Yes" den &c it-m is consxLM.to constim= an UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION. 9. Is PNSC review requimd for any of the following reasons? O K If,in answering question 1 or 3 "No," it was deren"in~4 hat se probability inc=ase was t small relative to the uncertainties: or, in answenng question 2 or 4 "No." it was de:ermted that &c doses inc:essed. but the dose was stillless Inan de NRC ACCEPTANCE or,in answe:ing question 7 "No," a parameter would be closer to the NRC ACCEPTANCE LIMIT. but the end result was stH1 within the NRC ACNANCE LIMIT: den PNSC review is s,uM. Rt.rr.KENCES: &Y This UM-4 Safety Qwn Dete:mmation is for the following DISCIPLINE (s): (Additional Part IV forms may be ieind-4 as e.pympaw ) 0 NuclearPlant Openeme OSm-1 NuclearEnpn%g 0 Meculurgy ,checimi g ch-imy/pmaimh, nistry ~ me si g Hesith Ph g ins #.a "4em & Control 0 M--a ysics 4 Connels O AI-109 Rev. 001 Page 80 of 87 }

i ENGINEERING EVALUATION EER No. 91-0450 SAFETY REVIEW REVISION No. O I Att. 7.1, Page No. 8 of 9 i t PART IV: UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DETERMINATION, Attached DISCUSSIONS 1. May the proposed activity increase the probability of occurrence of an accident evaluated previously in the SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT? l The Service Water. System is designed to mitigate the consequences of'an accident and is not directly capable of initiating any design basis accident. However, the system supports other systems that are capable of initiating a design basis accident. There were no design chanhes that affected the safety related function of the system. The subject EER concludes that the Service Water System remains within the design basis and remains fully capable of performing it's safety related function. Therefore, the proposed activity will not increase the probability of occurrence of an accident evaluated previously in the SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT. 2. May the proposed activity increase the consequences of an accident evaluated previously in the SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT? The Service Water System is designed to mitigate the consequences of an accident. The subject EER concludes that the Service Water System remains within the design basis and remains fully capable of performing it's safety related function. Therefore, the proposed activity will not i l increase the consequences of an accident evaluated previously in the l SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT. 3. May the proposed activity increase the probability of occurrence of a malfunction of equipment important to safety evaluated previously in the SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT? The Service Water System is designed to support the cooling requirements of equipment important to safety. The subject EER concludes that the Service Water System remains within the design basis and remains fully capable of performing it's safety related function. Therefore, the proposed activity will not increase the probability of occurrence of a malfunction of equipment important to safety evaluated previously in the SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT. 4. May the proposed activity increase the consequence of a malfunction of equipment important to safety evaluated previously in the SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT? The Service Water System is designed to support the cooling requirements of equipment important to safety. The subject EER concludes that the i i Service Water System remains within the design basis and remains fully capable of performing it's safety related' function. Therefore, the proposed activity will not increase the consequence of a malfunction of equipment important to safety evaluated previously in the SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT. l l l 1 1.

l ENGINEERXNG EVALUATION EER No. 91-0450 REVISION No. O I SAFETY REVIEW Att. 7.1, Page No. 9 of 9 i ) 5. May the proposed activity create the possibility of an accident of a different type than any evaluated previously in the SAFETY ANALYSIS l REPORT? ? l The Service Water System ir designed to mitigate the consequences of an accident and is not capable of initiating any design basis accident. There were no design changes that affected the safety related function of the system. The subject EER concludes that the Service Water System remains within the design basis and remains fully capable of performing i it's safety related function. Therefore, the proposed activity will not . l create the possibility of an accident of a different type than any 3 evaluated previously in the SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT. 6. May the proposed activity create the possibility of a malfunction of equipment important to safety of a different type than any evaluated j previously in the SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT? e i The Service Water System is designed to support the cooling requirements of equipment important to safety. There were no design changes that affected the safety related function of the system. The subject EER concludes that the Service Water System remains within the design basis and remains fully capable of performing it's safety related function. i Therefore, the proposed activity will not create the possibility of a i malfunction of equipment important to safety of a different type than any evaluated previously in the SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT. 7. Does the proposed activity reduce the margin of safety as defined in the basis of any Technical Specification? l i The subject EER concludes that the Service Water System remains within j the design basis and remains fully capable of performing it's safety i related function. No Technical Specification is affected by the EER. Therefore, the proposed activity will not reduce the margin of safety as defined in the basis of any Technical Specification.

References:

1. Tech. Spec. 3/4.7.1.2 2. TSI 90-03, Rev. 0 3. BSEP FSAR Chapters 9 & 15 4. Calculation G0050A-12, Rev. 3 e .-3 ,s,

S.u,P,t4t EER No. 41-o45 0 Rev. No. O FORM 3 ENGINEERING EVALUATION REPORT ENVIR.ONMENTAL QUALIFICATION IMPACT FORM (EER-EQIF) Will the evaluation, on either a temporary or permanent basis: l 1. Justify the deletion of equipment / common components from the BSEP EQ program? O Ye= & No 2. Justify the addition of (already existing) equipment / common components to the BSEP EQ program? h No Yes 3. Authorize the repair of EQ equipment / common co=ponents with other than cualified like-in-kind equipment /co=ponent parts? l O Ye= J so 4. Affect the existing installation or interface (of EQ equipment / common component applications) as may be designated in EDBS and/or in the qualification data package (including changing the type of interface / installation)? Yes @ No 5. Justify the (quality class) upgrade of equipment /co= mon co=ponents or_ component parts which could be utilized in EQ applications? [ No Yes 6. (Re) Define qualification parameters (e.g., normal or LOCA/RELB environ-mental conditions, postaccident operating time requirements, essential passive / active postaccident operating requirements, qualified life assu=ptions/results, etc.) for specific EQ equipment? i O Yes W wo 7. Provide an EQ-related justification f or continued operation (as required j per PLP-02, Section 4.4.3.3 o_r,4.4.4)? 5 No O Ye= 8. Provide the resolution of a qualification problem (as required per PLP-02, Section 4.4.4)? [ Yes No NOTES: 1. If all no, then no further EQ consideration is required. Mark the EER Traveler accordingly as required by ENP-12 and include l this co=pleted EER-EQIF vithin the EER package. An EQ l Technical Review is not required. I 2. If any yes, an EQ impact assessment (per Section 5.3) must be l perforrad during the evaluation process. Mark the EER Traveler i accordingly and include this completed EER-EQIF vithin the EER package. An EQ technical review is required. j l \\ l BSEP/Vol. II/ENP-34.1 20 Pav. 4 1 i

IIR No. 91-0450 REVISION No. 0 Att. 7.3 Page 1 of 19 O ~. g A. &t-g' g " %o D dg*Es3l u s 8savc v v v i ~c-o h k a

l. $. x$ k de N

<w.' w w e 9 f" ag ..T - 0 4 e lEgu:.7 C. O hm h h 3 rn -s m n g e 5 ~ aa c.ah *' q x r' i 6 B.

wge, o

c RA N.0 qw A A 2 r_. 7 = ~ = o 8 .( g' 5 p.-@a53 o D 6 m o w p 89 vn 9 w s 6 g ~- a c-R s ow"dA f4 a E@ 75 M 4 4 w l 3u 6 que D .~ ~ e,y 1 I L ) b k % 3 s

Ng

? 9 k e g ERG d { R A o - w N .O 4 .N .t u e t r' = 4 N 4 O E i 'i d 5 m e n

'SENT SY: DOCUMENT CONTROL-25-91 1 18:47 iCP&L BRUNSWICK PLANT

919 546 785418 4-1 EER No. 91-0450 REVISION No. 0

- ? ~ Att. 7.3 Page 2 of 19 UNIT 2 PT-24.6.4 DATA SHEET 2 DIESEL GENERATORS SERVICE VATER FICVS - i t DIESEL DIESEL CENERATOR #3 GENERATOR #4 STEP NO. JACKET WATER JACKET VATER COOLER SV COOLER SV i rEow rtov i 9.3.29 /,1% Egs// ', / TM 4</[ /. 9.3.33 f.3& 2 K *//wiu. J. 21) K *//st, 4 9 9.3.42 j,y1% M,I/w's /.i1z K9al/>;., { 9 l.34' n ot/' I l t i 1 i 4 i I

SENT'BY: DOCUMENT CONTROL 111-26-91 : 18:47 :CP&L BRUNSWICK PLANT

B19 546 7554t# 5 EER No. 91-0450 REVISION No. O Att. 7.3, Page 3 of 19

~ UNIT 2 PT 24.6.4 DATA SHEET S l DATA ACQUISITION SHEET ATTACEMENT NO.: i SITE NAME:

Od 7N "T f

f STEP No.: 9 I27 DATE: ll / 2G / 9f TIME Vs VALC TLOW TOTAL T!4*d TOTAL DITTERENCE j 1332 1787./ 50 3 /1/.45 K I323 I389.0 So S t42.44K I.+9 K 13S+ / 3 87, / 60 3/ 94,44R l.50 K 1335 1987.0 So 3146.94K I.S0 K I 35(o i387.o So 3147.43 K I.+1K I 1337 I387.0 SO ' 3/98,43 K I.50K I 133% 1387.0 So 3200,43K I.S0 K AverageJ.IZ f ggf l uunu j 1 i v i f i \\ F

SENT BY: DOCUMENT CotRROL

11-25-91 : 18:47 :CP&L BRUNSWICK PLAfUa 919 546 7854t# 6 EER No. 91-0450 REVISION No. O Att. 7.3, Page 4 of 19 UNIT 2 FT 24.6.4 DATA SHEET 5 DATA ACQUISITION SHEET ATTACHMENT NO. :

I stTE NAME: 3 o a Jr v-STEP NO.: E 3 73 DATE: // /Zc /f/ TIME Vs VALC FIDW TOTAL FI#d TOTAL DIFFERENCE 1530 13+7.1 50 5365.22 x 1531 1347.1 50 3344.58 x l.3& K 1532. 1547,7. So 35cq,94.g j.35 g /533 / Sf7, Z. So 3349, so R I,34 K /53+ /347.P-So 3370. 47 K l.37 R /535 /347.2. 50 3372.03 R I.36 k 1534 /3+7,0 41 3373.39 x l.36 K Average /,3[,ZN g/ I 't ,a

SENT BY: DOCUMENT CONTROL

11-26-91 : 18:48 :CP&L BRUNSWICK PLANT

919 545 7854t#-7 EER No. 91-0450 REVISION No. O Att. 7.3, Page 5 of 19 UNIT 2 PT 24.6.4 i

DATA SHEET 5 DATA ACQUISITION SHEET 1 ATTACHMENT No.: 3 $1TE NAME: __3 0 4 Jk T STEP NO.: 9 2 T2 04Ta: // / 24 ff/ TIME Vs VALC FI4W TOTAL FIhW TOTAL DIFFERENCE _.]6t2 1349.o 50 3443.SoK __ /4 2.8 /347.o So 3444 f4X l.34 K /4 24 /347.o So 3444.23K l.57 % /430 1544.7 So 3447.51g 1.34 % 1431 1S+&.8 60 3448.4(. K l.81 K /632. 1344,.7 6o 3450.32 K l.3/o X - /433 /344.4 So 3f5/. 41 K

l. 37 K Avct=ss L319 s/n;,

/.36r i iit.- IptkfI 3 J

SENT SY:DOCURSNT CONTROL

11-25-91 : 18:48 ;CP&L SRUNSWICK PLANT

S19 545 78541# 8 i

EER No. 91-0450 REVISION No. O Att. 7.3, Page 6 of 19 i UNIT 2 PT-24.6,4 DATA SHEET S ^ DATA ACQUISITION SHEET ATTACHMENT NO.: SITE NAME: 04 JK 7 4/// STEP NO.: i 3 Ei DArz: / / / 2(, f 1/ TIME Vs VALC FIEJ TOTAL U4V TOTAL DIFTERENCE I335 l4zo,5 30

g 1.g4 y I33+

l +2o.4 7o jj9,5g g 1.44 g 1335 / flo,5 70 12/.5/ R I13R 1334 1420.5 go iz3,45 y 1,9414 a. I337 l+20,5 10 /zS.39 x 1.94K /336 /4zo. 5 70 /27.3I K l.13X _. /534 l+2o.S 90 tz9,zd g

1. A4 x Average 1.43SK y/gg, 9

I 4

SENT BY:0OCUMENT CONTROL

11-25-31 : 18:49 CP&L BRUNSW3CK PLANTA 919 S45 7654:# 9 EER No. 91-0450 REVISION No. O Att. 7.3, Page 7 of 19 UNIT 2 FT 24.6.4 DATA SHEET 5 DATA ACQUISITION SHEET ATTACHMENT No.: _

T SITE NAME: 4 0 4 7E 7 STEP No.: i 3 33 DATE: ///2d/1[ TIME Vs VALC FIAW YOTAL FI4V TOTAL DIFFERENCE /544 /439 o 49 o,95 g 1545 I441,9 . g; g,15 g j,zj g /544 /439,0 41 3.42 R I. 24 K /547 /44o,3 6; 4,49 g /,z? g IS48 I4 41.7 4/ 5,95 g ), z.4 g 1541 I44t.1 &t 7,zt g

1. z 4 x

/550 /4+/.7 4/ 9.47 K l.z6 K AvenEs / ZSIk /3;, 3 l i

SENT-BY: DOCUMENT CONTROL 311-25-91 1 18:49 ;CP&L BRUNSW2CK PLANT ~ 919 S46 7654t#10 EER No. 91-0450 REVISION No. O Att. 7.3, Page 8 of 19 UNIT 2 PT-24.6.4 DATA SHEET 5 DATA ACQU151 TION SHEET ATTACHMENT No.: 4 51TE NAME: A OS IK T STEP No.: _ 7 3 4Z DATE: _///Zd/i[ TIME Va VA14 FLOW TOTAL FLOW TOTAL DIFTERENCE 14L7 1458.4 61 St.61 X ,.!?X h v 16 2 % I454.0 44 SS.8& K 1.17 K /629 /438,7 41 55,o4 y f, I g K IG30 l43S~7 49 S4.2I k I, I 9 K 14 5 I i +5 8. 9 70 57.38 K I. I 7k 1632. /4-39.6 &9 Sg.55 g

, j q g IC 33 1438.7 gg Sq,7z g j,17 g Average 1.l7ZRg/S,',

1

SENT GY: DOCUMENT CONTROL

11-25-91'; 15:49 *CP&L BRUNSW8CK PLANT
919 546 78543#11 EER No. 91-0450 REVISION No. O Att. 7.3, Page 9 of 19 I

UNIT 2 PT-24.6.4 DATA SHEET 3 SERVICE VATER BUILDING i L Co.W NUC NSW NSW NSW NSV NSV NSW HDR HDR ,?MP A PMP B PMP A - PMP A PUMP PUMP PRESS PRESS DISCH DISCH DISCH DISCH STEP 2A 23 TEST TEST PRESS PRESS STRN STRN NO. TLOW TLOV CAUCE#l CAUCE#l PI-PI-AP AP at at 144 145 PDIC PDIC PS-PS-138 140 3213 3214 ,.3.2, ,., e:.. a m..gg3.,, a.a ,,3 a

3 33 s.u '.? uM es. s,, ' " ' '.,, 'se.J

e. o. : e.,.',,: n A..:

l r

3 '2 ss 6 a.a M e,1.l,; ed,:

c e,'a o. <..', i0.a.: e.<.,e

1. ~,;,,..,

Test Cauge wl Data: CP&L No. d '/N 4oO i Range: O'/f4 f Installed El.: Cal Date: /I-20"9l Cal. Due Date: /E/ /0 fI / Test Cauge #2 Data: CP&L No. b III Range: O*/N/S[ Inatalled E1.: b~. Cal Date: -/I" 20 *91 Ib / il Cal. Due Date: II / f l 1 1 s 1 1 ~

-SENT BY: DOCUMENT-CONTROL 111'-25-91,1 18:50 iCP&L BRUNSWICK PLANTA - 919 545 'l854*#12 l y j. EER'No. 91-0450 i i l REVISION No. 0 .1 Att. 7.3, Page 10 of 19. j t Unit t.. PT.24.6.4 l f DATA SHEET 5 i DATA ACQUISITION SHEET l: ATTACHMENT No.: _ / -I $1TE NAME: 2 A WPMp STEP No.: 9 3.27 DATE: Ii / t e, / t I* TIME Vs VALC FIDW TOTAL FIDU. TOTAL' DITTERENCE. 1 A.* 3 I I4 4 LI. sl #l.s 49 p S ry e, s tw ,,, g sg... sS:3E 1444.4 49 2 43. f 2 e,,, i IS133 9444,4 49 2UA.9E ti r > - 13:34 f a v w al 49 2S4.64 e na 11 :1 5 ~ 14 4 4,4 un Pho.S4-1 >e 15 : Sl, 1444,4 49 s h ta c ta e ny 0 11:39 1944.4 sn 27!.96 Average 5,70 m,s. 5 1 .I j l

.SENT BY: DOCUMENT CONTROL

11-25-91 1 18: 50 ;CP&L' BRUNSWICK PLANT

919 546 7554:#13 EER No. 91-0450 REVISION No. 0 Att. 7.3, Page 11 of 19 WIT 2 PT 24.6.4 DATA SHEET 5 DATA ACQUISITION SHEET ATTACMENT NO. :

/ s1TE NAME: 2 A M8M # STEP No.: 9 5.33 DATE: 11 / e6/ or TIME Vs VALC FIrv TOTAL FLOW TOTAL DIITERENCE W 15'2% I443.5 49 S t, ry oq ess ,,a 15:29 14 st3. & Hb S'73.6 2 c a ri IE! *A n Isid 3. K 49 $!!t.99 .x..,a e-16 3J iu y 3,5

A 384,91 s

m. 15 'b 2 1445,5 a9 3 9 6,su 15:33 r H y s,H 48 394.ss l n-a.s s 7 5f 3 4 14 43. V 49 40 2,78 eos 1635 t aq,, g Lip yes.4 l X Average 5.9 1 '*k.

SENT BY: DOCUMENT. CONTROL _ 11-25-91.i 18:50 :CP&L BRUNSWICK PLANT

919 546 7854t#14 1

i EER No. 91-0450 REVISION No. O Att. 7.3, Page 12 of 19 UNIT 2 PT 24.6.4 DATA SHEET 5 r DATA A;QUISITION SHEET ATTACHMENT NO : SITE NAME: 2 A N 4p STEP No.: 7' 2 N t DATE: II //6 /9f_ TIME Vs VALC FLOlJ TOTAL FLOW TOTAL f DIFFERENCE sG r al ra4s.I 49 r e a. e s~ i n.e 1625 / 4 </ 3, i u9 I e o.o 3 IL fb lacts,l qg g p g, 9 g .a-1 .-v Ib t!! 14'l '\\, ? u9 201.8% n m.,,rrn, r& pa 1/43,2 49 7 67. 9 t/ .. a, n, i 86Po /</ 44 3 2 49 p ts. A i de a m 4,VU a e p - a. - - v# IGAn i u ni s, P 49 2 l 9. f. 9 eg I f> 3 1 1441.1 49 225,& t N *I[u;, f Average M 3 S.14 4L n s*

f r

i 6

.SENT=BY: DOCUMENT CONTROL

11-25-91: 18:51 ;CP&L BRUNSWICK FLANT*'

S19 545 7854*#15 i EER No. 91-0450 REVISION No.-0 Att. 7.3, Page 13 of 19 . i l UNIT 2-PT 24.6.6 DATA SHEET 5 i t DATA ACQUISITION SHEET E ATTACHMENT NO.; _ IITE NAME: Z O M AM8 STEP NO.:

3 27 DATE:

1i / t6 / ni TIME Vs VALC FIDW TOTAL TIDW TOTAL DITTERENCE 13 *CS 1444,3 7tf 3 3,0 G gsN-4FW 3 I S T E l-104H.9 ' sid 39,4 9 ~ 8 31 E1 1444.4/ N 4/4.36 n,,o I b ' SR 1444,9 'f 4 49.94 i ~ or > -- n-w s *n t.5 9 /a u d. 3 17 4 SS. Sal -^ ' .,,w-Ide n n i ti qq. A qq 58, l t,

7. w 6 l&? O \\

l M& N. 5 OY ' la E,00 I, 5 I Am.s. w * % i I 4 l-1

SENT BY:00CURENT CONTROL

11-25-91 1 18: 51
CP&L BRUNSNCK PLANTA 919 545 76543#16 IER No. 91-0450 REVISION No. O Att. 7.3, Page 14 of 19 UNIT 2 PT 24.6,4 DATA SHEET 5 DATA ACQUISITION SHEET ATTACHMENT No.

SITE NAME: 2ON#W8 STEP NO,: 9*8 33 DATE:

v

/fG /si TIME Vs VALC FI4W TOTAL FIDW TOTAL DIFFERENCE 15:39 1445.5 rid 16 29

o...r _ i 1s40 1943.'7

'7d 14.95 .,, n IS'il ! 4 tto, G 14 y 9, g 9, ,,...c e D5N2 IG M L le !?4 2 4,14 ru ro 1 -~ 15 4 S 14 4 3.f.o 17 8/ 9 8, 17.9

a.. r '

c 15 4'l /84.^ 1. 6 18/ 33.44 ,l, 4 3 15Ll3 r at q 1, lo tru 38, b 4 own Y$ lN N b e $Y Yfth Average 4.c,2 %I/. )

SENT~BY: DOCUMENT CONTROL

11-25-91 ; 18:52 iCP&L SRUNSW3CK PLANT

919 5A5 7854t#17.

[ s EER No. 91-0450 REVISION No. 0 Att. 7.3, Page 15 of 19 i l I UNIT 2 Tic 24.6.4 DATA SHEET $ DATA ACQUISITION SHEET i ATTACHMENT No.: E SITE NAME: r E a /wr STEP No.: i 8 YZ DATE: If /26/9i TIME Vs VALC TIhV TOTAL FIhV TOTAL DITTERENCE /634 /4432 7e/ t t. 2N i u,_ s IG35 r is eJ %. 2 !? 4 IL,R L ,e-16 3L I443.1 14 21< E l l

1. - >

l IL 39 144_M.9 7 tl 26,1? n,..e r j I G 3 9. I LILJ S, p ' ry Q 36,111 ,i..c a. IG33 Idy s. l 14 .ss, r g a>r j g 1640 14e s. ? VU 39.91 \\ .1 ra I64I 1443.1 /14 4 4.52 } Avera58 4.60 l,- 1 i l. 1 i l i

SENT BY:0OCUMENT CONTROL

11-25-91 : 18:52 ;CP&L BRUNSWZCK PLANT

919 545 7654;#18 EER No. 91-0450 REVISION No. O Att. 7.3, Page 16 of 19 UNIT 2 PT 24.6.4 DATA SHEET 4 REACTCR BUILDING EL.

17' VITAL VITAL VITAL HDR EDR EDR SW A 1DOP 3 LOOP STEP FIhU PRESS PRESS NO. TEST TEST CAUGE83 CAUGE 84 at at Nff/[Ar/4) PI-821(rgi) PI-819 (/$i) 9.3.29 /, 446 */ 6J V. 66 t 9.3.33 /.054 63 (, 6 9.3.42 / #67 63 64I t Test cauge #3 Data: i { CP&L No. b Il 4 Range: 0-f oo psi Installed El.: (-) t 2.G t s Cal Date: II-IS

9 I J

Cal. Dus Date: II / IG / U Test Cauge #4 Data: CP&L No. -b ~207 Range: 0"/00 #5[ Installed El.: b I3a O Cal Date: //- il" i' Cal. Due Date: _l2 / 4 / Si G 8

SENT BY: DOCUMENT CONTROL-311-25-91 i 18:52 3CP&L BRUNSWICK PLANT

919 546 7854:#19 EER No. 91-0450 REVISION No. O Att. 7.3. Page 17 of 19 UNIT 2 PT 24.6.4 DATA SHEET 5 DATA ACQUISITION SHEET ATTACHMF.NT NO. :

O SITE NAME: Yl7'MOR STEP 50.: _ V* 3 'E 1 DATE: II /2D / 9I TIME Vs VALC FIDW TOTAL FIDW TOTAL DIFTERENCE 15.3D 3 3 '7 M 334.63l lE S I it+33.R 25 335,65

13. Se NM,0 '

f5 3%. '70

'!T-

)& O lu '63, K f6 33 7.'75 ',' } ~ NM N 33.6 2c; 33 Y. FO ' 15 13'. 3 5 to 33. 5 K5 339. Y6 '/ L 6% N33X %4 .340. YT ' ' ~ ' Average /,06 rp/4, t I s i \\

SENT SY:DOCURENT CONTROL

11-25-91 ; 18: 53 ;CF&L BRUNSWICK PLANT

919 546 75541#20 EER No-91-0450 REVISION No. 0 Att. 7.3, Page 18 of 19 UNIT 2 PT-24.6.4 DATA SHEET 5 DATA ACQUISITICH SHEET 4

I ATTACHMENT NO.: SITE NAME: MIN 88 STEP 50.; ? I 33 DATR: // / 28 / 9/ = TIME Vs VALC FI4V TOTAL FIDW TOTAL DIFFERENCE 1526 /45).z. 85 6.440 " /. o g / 52e /433. / .99 /. 59 /. o p /S36 In2 6 8F 2 51 /. e $~ /5 51 14$$. o BV 36V /. 06 _ /532-1632 4 85 4.70 / 0C / S33 /432 6 8F 5.74 Average /gn xc.44/g. l i 1

SENT SY:0OCUMENT CONTROL

11-25-91: 18:53 ;CP&L BRUNSWICK PLANT *

.919 545 7854:#21 ^ EER No. 91-0450 REVISION No. O Att. 7.3, Page 19 of 19 UNIT 2 PT.24.6.4 DATA SHEET 5 DATA ACQUISITION SHEET 8 ATTACHMENT NO. : - s SITE NAME: VN8M STEP NO.: EN DATE: // / ZS / 9/ TIME Vs VA14 F14W TOTAL FI4W TOTAL DIFFERENCE A 2+ /4-32. '7 85 2 2 +- 42s /+32. P 85 3.50 /. o g 5 ' ' ' * " " M 2/2 /432.+ 65 f 37 /.o 7 /627 /4-52.6 85 5 4+-

f. o 7 i

N 28 14-3 2. 4-85' 1;. So /.0C li24 M 32.3 e5 7 54 /. 06 /530 /A 37. 4-85 8.g g /.06 Average /.067 Xf $4 w 3 I ^

i; q EER-91-0450 Att.74, Rev. 0 Page 1 of Q ANALYSIS RESULTS FOR "U2CALEN2" q FLOWRATE IS EXPRESSED IN GPM AND PRESSURE IN PSIG THE DARCY WEISBACH HEAD LOSS EQUATION IS USED, THE KINEMATIC VIS. =.0000070-THE SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF THIS LIQUID = 1.03 i A SUCCESSFUL GEOMETRIC VERIFICATION HAS BEEN COMPLETED OUTPUT SELECTION: THE FOLLOWING RESULTS ARE OUTPUT RESULTS ARE OUTPUT FOR ALL PIPES WITH PUMPS - CLOSED PIPES ARE NOTED RESULTS ARE OUTPUT FOR THE FOLLOWING PIPES : 5 2 16-- 31 34 38 41 47 50 l 57 62 -79 88 92 97 101 105 109 116 120 RESULTS ARE OUTPUT FOR THE FOLLOWING PIPES : 128 134 146:152 168 176 182 188 198 i 501 503 32 58 63 110 117 121 218 224 234 RESULTS ARE OUTPUT FOR THE FOLLOWING PIPES : 59 111 235 197 233 RESULTS ARE OUTPUT FOR THE FOLLOWING JUNCTION NODES : 1 2 14 15-16 27 28 36 37 49 50 66 70 74 75 -l 1 RESULTS ARE OUTPUT FOR THE FOLLOWING JUNCTION NODES : 90 91 100 101 109 110.143 'i 144 156 157-18 23 98.165 302 i RESULTS ARE OUTPUT FOR THE FOLLOWING JUNCTION NODES : 204 205 i THIS SYSTEM HAS 247 PIPES WITH 212 JUNCTIONS, 31 LOOPS AND 5'FGNS 4 l 1 ll THE RESULTS ARE OBTAINED AFTER' 6 TRIALS WITH AN ACCURACY =-.00102-i U2CALEN2 - CHANGE 0: SIMULATES STEP 9.3.29 OF PT-24.6.4 I A LOOP RHRSW IN SERVICE AT 3000 GPM (2 RERSWP'S)-RBCCW AT 3500 GPM-2.NSWP'S VITAL HDR IN SERVICE-DG'S 3 & 4 IN SERVICE-NO LUBE WATER t PIPE NO. NODE NOS. FLOWRATE HEAD LOSS PUMP HEAD MINOR LOSS VELOCITY' HL/1000 'l O 'l 5233.66 .02 156.74 .00 7.73 18.55 2 '1 2 5233.66 .18

. 00 1.98 7.73 18.55 1

4 0 4 5270.63 .02 -' 156.12' .00 7.78 -18.81 5 4 5 5270.63 .18. .00 1.30 7.78. 18.81'. 16-12 13 .00- .00 .00 .00- .00' .00 31 27' 28 82.51 .06 00 8.83 6.26 '64.48

i 32 28 29 82.51 9.97

.00 54.76, 11.66 316.40 { 34 304 305' 553.19 .97 .00 3.13 15.48 202.53' i 38 36 37-109.56 .11 .00-31.88 '8.31' '111.43 41 3B 39 107.58 .11 .00 30.-74 8.16 107.55 47-41 42' 109.50' .11 .00 31.84 8.31 '111.30 50 43 44 107.18 .11 .00 30.51 8.13 106.79 -l

i

'I

r EER-91-0450 Att. 7.4, Rev. O Page 2 of 9 ANALYSIS RESULTS FOR HU2CALBN2" 57 49 50 18.52 .33 .00 47.41 8.21 328,45 58 50 51 18.52 5.65 .00 17.79 8.21 328.45 59 51 52 36.86 .20 .00 .82 7.68 179.45 62 53 54 18.33 .32 .00 46.44 8.13 321.93 63 54 51 18.33 2.90 .00 17.94 8.13 321.93 LINE 79 IS CLOSED 88 74 75 103.54 .10 .00 28.47 7.86 99.88-92 76 77 104.26 .10 .00 28.87 7.91 101.24~ 97 81 82 104.88 .10 .00 29.21 7.96 102.40 101 83 84 103.13 .10 .00-28.24 7.83 99.11 105 88 68 515.97 1.34 .00 5.28 5.72 16.65 109 90 91 16.87 .27 .00 39.34 7.48 274.32. 110 91 92 16.87 6.58 .00 33.24 7.48 .274.32 111 92 93 33.89 .14 .00 .17 7.06 152.66' 116 96 97 17.02 .28 .00 40.02 7.54 278.91 117 97 92 17.02 3.12 .00 33.57 7.54 278.91 120 100 101 66.26 .04 .00 5.69 5.03 142.35 121 101 88 66.26' 1,46 .00 89.63 5.03 42.35 LINE 128 IS CLOSED LINE 134 IS CLOSED 146 125 126 1408.25 .03 .00-25.34 9.03 28.90 152 131 132 1257.91 .02 .00 45.49 8.07 23.22 LINE 166 IS CLOSED 168 145 146 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 LIhT 174 IS CLOSED 176 158 146 .00 .00 .00 .00 -. 00 .00 LINE 179 IS CLOSED 182 151 152- .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00-LINE 185 IS CLOSED 188 163 164 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 197 170 171 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 198 302 165 .00 .00 .00 .00 . 00. .00-205 177 178 1498.62 .03 -749.29. .00 - 9.61-32.61 213 185 186 1501.38 .03 749.19 .00- . 16.53: 797.57. 9.63 -32.73-218 189 190 79.32-13.48 .00 7.17 224. 195 196 71.72-10.74 .00 5.86 ,14.95 654.'77' 233 203. 204 LINE 234 IS CLOSED. 3000.00 .01 .00 .00 -5.27 4.69. 235. 70 205 3500.00 .00 .00- .28 6.15 6.30. 501 86 301-415.81 .03 .00 63.09 4.61 11.01 503 46 '303 433.82 .07 .00

51.90 4.81 11.94-LINE.700 IS CLOSED-LINE 701 IS CLOSED LINE 702 IS CLOSED LINE 703 IS. CLOSED-

.IUNCTION NUMBER DEMAND CRADE LINE ELEVATION PRESSURE 1 .00 177.72 43.10 60.09 2 .00 175.57 42.40-59.44 14 .00 170.88 26.50 64.44 15 .00 171.33 26.50 64.64 16 .00 171.33 26.50. 64.64

i. EUER-91-0450 Att. ~74, Rev. O Page 3 of C) ANALYSIS RESULTS FOR "U2CALBN2" 18 .00 168.23 36.30 58.88 23 .00 142.30 12.50 57.93 27 .00 121.60 11.00 49.37 28 .00 112.71 10.80 45.49 36 .00 138.95 17.50 54.21 37 .00 106.96 17.50 39.93 49 .00 125.08 8.30 52.12 50 .00 77.34 8.30 30.82 66 3500.00 161.80 77.20 37.76 70 -3500.00 42.75 74.10 -13.99 74 .00 153.05 17.50 60.50 75 .00 124.48 17.50 47.75 90 .00 140.26 31.60 48.50 91 .00 100.65 31.60 30.82 98 .00 156.63 16.80 62.41 100 .00 144.10 11.40 59.23 101 .00 138.37 28.50 49.04 109 .00 165.82 44.40 54.19 110 .00 31.13 44.40 -5.92 143 .00 167.87 72.80 42.43 144 .00 40.41 74.20 -15.08 156 .00 167.84 72.80 42.42 157 .00 40.41 74.20 -15.08 165 .00 40.41 58.80 -8.21 204 3000.00 911.33 33.10 391.98 205 -3000.00 42.46 71.90 -13.14 i 302 .00 40.41 34.20 2.77 i THE NET SYSTEM DEMAND = .00

SUMMARY

OF INFLOWS (+) AND OUTFLOWS (-) FROM FIXED GRADE NODES PIPE NUMBER FLOWRAIE 1 5233.66 4 5270.63 158 -2666.16 161 -7720.20 600 -117 93 ) 1 THE NET FLOW INTO THE SYSTEM FROM FIXED CRADE NODES = 10504.29 THE NET FLOW OUT OF THE SYSTEM INTO FIXED CRADE NODES = -10504.29 A

SUMMARY

OF CONDITIONS SPECIFIED FOR THE NEXT SIMULATION FOLLOWS THE FOLLOWING SPECIFIC DEMAND CHANCES ARE MADE : JUNCTION NUMBER DFFAND 204 .00 205 .00 302 3000.00 j

r EER-91-0450 Att. 74, Rev. O Page 4 of 9 1 ANALYSIS RESULTS FOR "U2CALBN2" 165 -3000.00 LINE 166 IS OPEN LINE 174 IS OPEN LINE 179 IS OPEN LINE 185 IS OPEN LINE 205 IS CLOSED LINE 213 IS CLOSED LINE 218 IS CLOSED LINE 224 IS CLOSED LINE 234 IS OPEN LINE 198 IS CLOSED THE FOLLOWING CHANCES IN PIPE DATA ARE SPECIFIED FOR PIPE NUMBER 1 THE VALUE OF THE FIXED GRADE IS CHANGED TO 19.2 FOR PIPE NUMBER 4 THE VALUE OF THE FIXED CRADE IS CHANGED TO 19.2 FOR PIPE NUMBER 600 THE VALUE OF THE FIXED CRADE IS CHANCED TO 160.0 PIPE NO. NODE NOS. LENGTH DIAMETER ROUCHNESS MINOR LOSS K FIXED CRADE 2 1 2 9.7 16.6 5.0 2.15 .00 5 4 5 9.7 16.6 5.0 1.40 .00 THE RESULTS ARE OBTAINED AFTER 6 TRIALS WITH AN ACCURACY = .00020 U2CALBN2 - CHANGE 1: SIMULATES STEP 9.3.33 0F FT-24.6.4 B LOOP RHRSW NOW IN SERVICE AT 3000 CPM REST OF LINEUP IS THE SAME PIPE NO. NODE NOS. FLOWRATE HEAD LOSS PUMP HEAD MINOR LOSS VELOCITY HL/1000 1 0 1 5222.99 .02 156.92 .00 ~ 7.71 18.47 2 1 2 5222.99 .18 .00 1.99 7.71 18.47 4 0 4 5259.88 .02 156.30 .00 7.77 18.73 5 4 5 5259.88 .18 .00 1.31 7.77 18.73 16 12 13 .00 .00 00 .00 .00 .00 31 27 28 81.63 .06 .00 8.64 6.19-63.16 32 28 29 81.63 9.76 .00 53.59 11.54 309.82-34 304 305 547.28 .95 .00 3.06 15.32 198.31 38 36 37 108.39 .11 .00 31.20 8.23 109.14 41 38 39 106.43 .11 - .00 30.08 8.08 105.34 47 41 42 108.33 .11 .00 -31.16 8.22 109.01 50 43 .44 106.04 .10 .00 29.86 8.05 104.59 57 49 50 18.33 .32 00 46.40 8.12 321.70 58 50' 51 18.33 -5.53 .00 17.41 8.12 321.70 59 51 52 36.46 .19 .00 .81 7.60 175.76 1 62 53 54 18.14 .32 .00 45.45 8.04 315.31 63 54 51 18.14 2.84 .00 17.56 8.04 315.31 LINE 79 IS CLOSED 88 74 75 102.98 .10 .00 28.16 7.82 98.84 I

i EER-91-0450 Att. 74, Rev. O Page 5 of 9 ANALYSIB RESULTS FOR "U2CAIJN2n 92 76 77 103.70 .10 .00 28.56 7.87 100.18 97 81 82 104.32 .10 .00 28.90 7.92 101.34-101 83 84 102.57 .10 .00 27.94 7.78 98.08 105 88 68 513.18 1.32 .00 5.23 5.69 16.47 109 90 91 16.78 .27 .00 38.91 7.44 271.46 110 91 92 16.78 6.51 .00 32.88 7.44 271.46 111 92 93 33.71 .14 .00 .17 7.03 151.07 116 96 97 16,93 .28 .00 39.59 7.50 276.01 117 97 92 16.93 3.09 .00 33.21 7.50 276.01 120 100 101 65.91 .04 .00 5.63 5.00 41.91 121 101 88 65.91 1.45 .00 88.66 5.00 41.91 LINE 128 IS CLOSED LINE 134 IS CLOSED 146 125 126 1400.16 .03 .00 25.05 8.98 28.58 152 131 132 1250.69 .02 .00 44.97 8.02 22.96 166 143 144 1501.71 .03 749.18 .00 9.63 32.74 168 145 146 1501.71 .07 .00 .26 4.26 4.15 174 156 157 1498.29 .03 749.30 .00 9.61 32.60 176 158 146 1498.29 .13 .00 .30 4.25 4.14 t 182 151 152 80.65 16.40 .00 10.61 16.81 823.91 188 163 164 77.58 15.19 .00 8.97 16.17 763.49 197 170 171 3000.00 .02 .00 .21 5.27 4.69 LINE 198 IS CLOSED LINE 205 IS CLOSED LINE 213 IS CLOSED LINE 218 IS CLOSED LINE 224 IS CLOSED 233 203 204 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 234 204 205 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1 235 70 205 3500.00 .00 .00 .28 6.15 6.30 ) 501 86 301 413.57 .03 .00 62.41 4.58 10.89 503 46 303 429.19 .07 .00 50.80 4.76 11.69 LINE 700 IS CLOSED l LINE 701 IS CLOSED LINE 702 IS CLOSED LINE 703 IS CLOSED JUNCTION NUMBER DEMAND GRADE LINE ELEVATION PRESSURE 1 .00 176.10 43.10 59.36 2 .00 173.93 42.40 58.71 14 .00 169.27 26.50 63.72 15 .00 169.27 26.50 63.72 16 .00 169.27 26.50 63.72 18 .00 166.62 36.30 58.17 23 .00 141.20 12.50 57.44 1 27 .00 120.94 11.00 49.07 28 .00 112.24 10.80 45.28 36 .00 137.92 17.50 53.75 37 .00 106.61 17.50 39.77 49 .00 124.35 8.30 51.80 50 .00 77.63 8.30 30.94 66 3500.00 160.19 77.20 37.04

EER-91-0450 Att.'/,4, Rev. O Page 6 of C) ANALYSIS RESULTS FOR "U2CALBN2" 70 -3500.00 41.28 74.10 14.65 74 .00 151.65 17.50 59.88 i 75 .00 123.39 17.50 47.26 90 .00 139.00 31.60 47.93 91 .00 99.81 31.60 30.45 98 .00 155.19 16.80 61.77 100 .00 142.79 11.40 58.65 101 .00 137.12 28.50 48.48 109 .00 164.25 44.40 53.49 110 .00 31.11 44.40 -5.93 143 .00 165.47 72.80 41.36 144 .00 914.62 74.20 375.11 156 .00 165.44 72.80 41.35 157 .00 914.71 74.20 375.15 165 -3000.00 41.62 58.80 -7.67 204 .00 40.99 33.10 3.52 i 205 .00 40.99 71.90 -13.80 302 3000.00 909.67 34.20 390.75 THE NET SYSTEM DEMAND = .00

SUMMARY

OF INFLOWS (+) AND OUTFLOWS (-) FROM FIXED CRADE NODES l PIPE NUMBER FLOWRATE i 1 5222.99 4 5259.88 158 -2650.85 161 -7718.68 600 -113.34 THE NET FLOW INTO THE SYSTEM FROM FIXED GRADE NODES = 10482.86 THE NET FLOW OUT OF THE SYSTEM INTO FIXED CRADE NODES = -10482.87 A

SUMMARY

OF CONDITIONS SPECIFIED FOR THE NEXT SIMULATION FOLLOWS LINE 166 IS CLOSED LINE -174 IS CLOSED LIhT 179 IS CLOSED LINE 185 IS CLOSED LINE 205 IS OPEN LINE 213 IS OPEN LINE 218 IS OPEN LINE 224 IS OPEN LINE 198 IS OPEN LINE 234 IS CLOSED THE FOLLOWING CHANGES IN PIPE DATA ARE SPECIFIED FOR PIPE NUMBER 600 THE VALUE OF THE FIXED CRADE IS CHANGED TO 49.8

EER-91-0450 Att. 74, Rev. O Page 7 of 9 ANALYSIS RESULTS FOR U2CALBN2 FOR PIPE NUMBER 1 THE VALUE OF THE FIXED GRADE-IS CHANCED TO 18.6 FOR PIPE NUMBER 4 THE VALUE OF THE FIXED GRADE IS CHANCED TO 18.6 PIPE NO. NODE NOS. LENGTH DIAMETER ROUGHNESS MINOR LOSS K FIXED CRADE 2 1 2 9.7 16.6 5.0 1.90 .00 5 4 5 9.7 16.6 5.0 1.48 .00 THE RESULTS ARE OBTAINED AFTER 5 TRIALS WITH AN ACCURACY = .00126 U2CALEN2 - CHANGE 2: SIMULATES STEP 9.3.42 0F PT-24.6.4 CONVENTIONAL SW HEADER DEPRESSURIZED A LOOP RHRSW IN SERVICE REST OF LINEUP IS SAME AS CHANCE O PIPE NO. NODE NOS. FLOWRATE HEAD LOSS PUMP HEAD MINOR LOSS VELOCITY HL/1000 1 0 1 5351.63 .02 154.74 .00 7.90-19.39 2 1 2 5351.63 .19 .00 1.84 7.90 19.39 4 0 4 5373.01 .02 154.38 .00 7.94 19.54 5 4 5 5373.01 .19 .00 1.45 7.94 19.54-16 12 13 .00- .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 31 27 28 81.05 .06 .00 8.52 6.15 62.30-32 28 29 81.05 9.63 .00 52.83 11.46 305.58-34 304 305 543.43 .94 .00 3.02 15.21 195.58 38 36 37 107.63 .11 .00 30.77-8.17 107.66' 41 38 39 105.68 .10 .00 29.66 8.02' 103.92 47 41 42 107.57 .11 .00 30.73 8.16 107.53 50 43 44 105.29. .10 .00 29.44 7.99 103.18 57 49 50 18.20- .32 .00 45.75 8.07 317.33 58 50 31 18.20 5.46 .00 17.17 8.07-317.33 59 51 52 36.21 .19 .00 .80 7.55 173.38 62 53 54 18.01 .31 .00 44.81 7.98-311.03 63 54 51 18.01 2.80 .00 17.31 7.98 311.03 LINE 79 IS CLOSED 88 74 75 101.70 .10 .00 27.47 _7.72 96.49 92 76 77 102.42 .10 .00 27.86 7.77 97.80 97 81 82 103.03 .10 .00 28.19' 7.82 98.93 101 83 84 101.30. .10 .00 105 88 68 506.83 1.29 .00 ~ 27.25 7.69 95.75 5.10 5.62 16.08 109 90 91 16.57 .26 .00 37.95 7.35 -264.99 110 91 92 16.57-6.36 .00 32.07 7.35 264.99 111-92 93 33.29 .13 .00 .16 -6.94 147.48-116 96 97-16.72 .27 .00 38.61 -7.41 269.44' 117 97 92 16.72 3.02 .00 32.39' 7.41 269.44 120. 100 101 65.09 .04 .00 5.49 4.94 40.93 -121 101 88 65.09-1.41 .00 86.48 4.94 40.93 LINE 128 IS CLOSED ~ LINE-134 IS CLOSED 146 125 126 1385.66 .03 .00 24.53-8.89 28.01 152 131 132 1237.73 .02. .00 44.04 7.94 22.50 LINE 166 IS CLOSED

EER-91-0450 Att. 74, Rev. O Page 8 of 9 ANALYSIS RESULTS FOR "U2CALBN2" 168 145 146 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 LINE 174 IS CLOSED 176 158 146 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 LINE 179 IS CLOSED 182 151 152 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 LINE 185 IS CLOSED 188 163 164 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 197 170 171 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 198 302 165 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 205 177 178 1498.62 .03 749.29 .00 9.61 32.61 213 185 186 1501.38 .03 749.19 .00 9.63 32.73 218 189 190 78.51 13.21 .00 7.02 16.36 781.53 224 195 196 70.48 10.38 .00 5.66 14.69 632.69 233 203 204 3000.00 .01 .00 .00 5.27 4.69 LINE 234 IS CLOSED 235 70 205 3500.00 .00 .00 .28 6.15 6.30 501 86 301 408.45 .02 .00 60.88 4.53 10.64 503 46 303 426.17 .07 .00 50.09 4.72 11.54 LINE 700 IS CLOSED LINE 701 IS CLOSED LINE 702 IS CLOSED LINE 703 IS CLOSED JUNCTION NUMBER DEMAND CRADE LINE ELEVATION PRESSURE 1 .00 173.32 43.10 58.12 2 .00 171.29 42.40 57.53 14 .00 166.39 26.50 62.44 15 .00 166.39 26.50 62.44 16 .00 166.39 26.50 62.44 18 .00 163.77 36.30 56.89 23 .00 138.74 12.50 56.35 27 .00 118.76 11.00 48.10 28 .00 110.18 10.80 44.36 36 .00 135.51 17.50 52.67 37 .00 104.64 17.50 38.89-49 .00 122.13 8.30 50.80 50 .00 76.06 8.30 30.24 66-3500.00 157.34 77.20 35.77 70 -3500.00 42.75 74.10 -13.99 74 .00 149.12 17.50 58.75 75 .00 121.55 17.50 46.44 90 .00 136.77 31.60 46.94 91 .00 98.56 31.60 29.89 98 .00 152.57 16.80 60.60 100 .00 140.47 11.40 57.61 101 .00 134.94 28.50 47.51 109 .00 161.47 44.40 52.25 110 .00 143 .00 - 31.06 44.40 -5.95 163.41 72.80 40.44 144 .00 40.41 74.20 -15.08 156 .00 163.38 72.80 40.43 157 .00 40.41 74.20 -15.08

EER-91-0450 L Att. 7,4, Rev. 0 ) Page 9 of 9 l ANALYSIS RESULTS FOR "U2CALEN28' 1 l 1 l 165 .00 40.41 58.80 -8.21 204 3000.00 906.87 33.10 389.99 'i l 205 -3000.00 42.46 71.90 -13.14 302 .00 40.41 34.20 2.77 THE NET SYSTEM DEMAND = .00 1

SUMMARY

OF INFLOWS (+) AND OUTFLOWS (-) FROM FIXED CRADE NODES PIPE NUMBER FLOWRATE 1 5351.63 4 5373.01 158 -2623.39 i 161 -7699.24 i i 600 -402.02 j THE NET FLOW INTO THE SYSTEM FROM FIXED CRADE NODES = 10724.64 THE NET FLOW OUT OF THE SYSTEM INTO FIXED CRADE NODES = -10724.64 i

Est-91-c@o A4.U b 0 3 f453e l 12. t ANALYSIS RESULTS FOR "U2SCNRIO* 1 FLOWRATE IS EXPRESSED IN GPM AND PRESSURE IN PSIC THE DARCY WEISBACH HEAD LOSS EQUATION IS USED, THE KINEMATIC VIS = .0000070 THE SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF THIS LIQUID = 1.03 A SUCCESSFUL GEOMETRIC VERIFICATION HAS BEEN COMPLETED OUTPUT SELECTION: THE FOLLOWING RESULTS ARE OUTPUT RESULTS ARE OUTPUT FOR ALL PIPES WITH PLHPS CLOSED PIPES ARE NOTED RESULTS ARE OUTPUT FOR THE FOLLOWING PIPES : 5 2 16 31 34 38 41 47 50 57 62 79 88 92 97 101 105 109 116 120 RESULTS ARE OUTPUT FOR THE FOLLOWING PIPES : 128 134 146 152 168 176 182 188 198 501 503 32 58 63 110 117 121 218 224 234 RESULTS ARE OUTPUT FOR THE FOLLOWING PIPES : 59 111 235 197 233 RESULTS ARE OUTPUT FOR THE FOLLOWING JUNCTION NODES : 1 2 14 15 16 27 28 36 37 49 50 66 70 74 75 RESULTS ARE OUTPUT FOR THE FOLLOWING JUNCTION NODES. 90 91 100 101 109 110 143 i 144 156 157 18 23 98 165 302 RESULTS ARE OUTPUT FOR THE FOLLOWING JUNCTION NODES : 204-205 I THIS SYSTEM HAS 247 PIPES WITH 212 JUNCTIONS, 31 LOOPS AND 5 FGNS '{ THE RESULTS ARE OBTAINED AFTER S TRIALS WITH AN ACCURACY = .00003 U2SCNRIO CHANGE 0: VERIFIES RESULTS OF U2TYFOON CH. 6 ARE STILL VALID PIPE NO. NODE NOS. FLOWRATE HEAD LOSS PUMP HEAD MINOR LOSS VELOCITY HL/1000 1 0 1 1812.66 .00 194.94 .00 2.68 2.24 2 1 2 1812.66 .02 .00 10.04 2.68 2.24 4 0 4 1812.75 .00 194.94 .00 2.68 2.24 5 4 5 1812.75 .02 .00 10.04 2.68 2.24 16 12 13 208.00 1.28 .00 .71 6.82 112.87 LINE 31 IS CLOSED 32 28 29 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 34 304 305 512.91 .84 .00 2.69 14 36 174.66 38 36 37 129.54 .15 .00 44.57 9.83 154.19 41 38 39 127.19 .15 .00 42.96 9.65 148.81 47 41 42 129.46 .15 .00 44.51 9.82-154.00 50 43 44 126.72 .15 .00 42.65 9.62 147.73 LINE 57 IS CLOSED 58 50 51 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 59 51 52 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00

G GA.- Ql- & @ kh.N O 1?uy.z.Ji2. ANALYSIS RESULTS FOR "U2SCNRIO" LINE 62 IS CLOSED 63 54 51 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 LINE 72 IS CLOSED LINE 73 IS CLOSED LINE 74 IS CLOSED 79 66 70 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 LINE 88 IS CLOSED LINE 92 IS CLOSED LINE 97 IS CLOSED LINE 101 IS CLOSED 105 88 68 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 LINE 109 IS CLOSED 110 91 92 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 111 92 93 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 LINE 116 IS CLOSED 117 97 92 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 LINE 120 IS CLOSED 121 101 88 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 LINE-128 IS CLOSED LINE 134 IS CLOSED 146 125 126 1534.15 .03 .00 30.07 9.84 34.13 152 131 132 1370.36 .03 .00 53.98 8.79 27.41 LINE 166 IS CLOSED l 168 145 146 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 LINE 174 IS CLOSED i 176 158 146 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 LINE 179 IS CLOSED 182 151 152 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 LINE 185 IS CLOSED 188 163 164 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 197 170 171 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 198 302 165 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 LINE 205 IS CLOSED LINE 213 IS CLOSED LINE 218 IS CLOSED LINE 224 IS CLOSED 233 203 204 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 234 204 205 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 235 70 205 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 501 86 301 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 503 46 303 512.91 .10 .00 72.55 5.69' 16.46 LINE 600 IS CLOSED LINE 700 IS CLOSED LINE 701 IS CLOSED LINE 702 IS CLOSED LINE 703 IS CLOSED JUNCTION NUMBER DEMAND. GRADE LINE ELEVATION FRESSURE 1 .00 206.31 43.10 72.84 2 .00 196.24 42.40 68.66 14 .00 195.68 26.50 75.51 15 .00 195.68 26.50 75.51 16 .00 195.68 26.50 75.51 18 .00 195.50 36.30 71.06 23 .00 178.19 12.50 73.95

Aw-qi-04ED A4. 7.574.' o 'P9 3 J 12. ANALYSIS RESULTS FOR "U2SCNRIO 27 .00 178.19 11.00 74.62 28 .00 45.33 10.80 15.41 36 .00 173.53 17.50 69.64 37 .00 128.80 17.50 49.68 49 .00 178.19 8.30 75.83 50 .00 50.29 8.30 18.74 66 .00 40.00 77.20 16.60 70 .00 40.00 74.10 -15.22 74 .00 193.65 17.50 78.62 75 .00 40.00 17.50 10.04 90 .00 193.65 31.60 72.33 91 .00 40.00 31.60 3.75 98 .00 193.65 16.80 78.94 100 .00 193.65 11.40 81.35 101 .00 40.00 28.50 5.13 109 .00 191.38 44.40 65.60 110 .00 31.55 44.40 -5.74 143 .00 195.50 72.80 54.77 144 .00 40.02 74.20 -15.25 156 .00 195.50 72.80 54.77 157 .00 40.02 74.20 -15.25 165 .00 40.02 58.80 -8.38 204 .00 40.00 33.10 3,08 205 .00 40.00 71.90 -14.24 302 .00 40.02 34.20 2.60 THE NET SYSTEM DEMAND = 208.00

SUMMARY

OF INFLOWS (+) ASID OUTFLOWS (-) FROM FIIED CRADE NODES PIPE NUMBER FLOWRATE 1 1812.66 4 1812.75 158 -2904.51 161 -512.91 THE NET FLOW INTO THE SYSTEM FROM FIIED CRADE NODES = 3625.42 THE NET FLOW OUT OF THE SYSTEM INTO FIXED GRADE NODES = -3417.42 A SUtf1ARY OF CONDITIONS SPECIFIED FOR THE NEIr SIMULATION FOLLOWS l l THE FOLLOWING SPECIFIC DEMAND CHANGES ARE PADE : JUNCTION NUMBER DEMAND 13 124.00 204 4850.00 205 -4850.00 LINE 31 IS OPEN LINE 57 IS OPEN LINE 62 IS OPEN LINE 72 IS OPEN LINE 73 IS OPEN LINE 74 IS OPEN

F.EE.-91-d2 i

k. 7.5 0.D '

3 Pqe 4op12. L ANALYSIS RESULTS FOR 'U2SCNRIO" l l l LINE 88 IS OPEN l LINE 92 IS OPEN LINE 97 IS OPEN i LINE 101 IS OPEN l LINE 109 IS OPEN l LINE 116 IS OPEN LINE 120 IS OPEN l LINE 128 IS OPEN LINE 134 IS OPEN LINE 205 IS OPEN LINE 213 IS OPEN LINE 218 IS OPEN LINE 224 IS OPEN LINE 234 IS CLOSED LINE 600 IS OPEN i THE FOLLOWING CHANCES IN PIPE DATA ARE SPECIFIED FOR PIPE NUMBER 1 THE VALUE OF THE FIXED GRADE IS CHANGED TO 14.0 l FOR PIPE NUMBER 4 THE VALUE OF THE FIXED CRADE IS CHANGED TO 14.0 FOR PIPE NUMBER 600 THE VALUE OF THE FIXED GRADE IS CHANCED TO 26.5 PIPE NO. NODE NOS. LENGTH DIAMETER ROUGHNESS MINOR LOSS K FIXED GPADE 2 1 2 9.7 16.6 5.0 6.67 .00 5 4 5 9.7 16.6 5.0 6.67 .00 24 20 55 24.1 19.3 .2 210.38 .00 79 66 70 29.5 15.3 .2 18.38 .00 130 111 112 79.0 5.6 5.0 13.28 .00 136 117 118 100.4 5.6 5.0 13.61 .00 1 148 127 128 74.8 5.6 5.0 12.68 .00 154 133 134 75.7 5.6 5.0 13.28 .00 THE RESULTS ARE OBTAINED AFTER 7 TRIALS WITH AN ACCURACY = .00087 U2SCNRIO CHANGE 1: VERIFIES RESULTS OF U2@ POWER CH.4 ARE STILL VALID PIPE NO. NODE NOS. FLOWRATE HEAD LOSS PUMP HEAD MINOR LOSS VELOCITY HL/1000 1 0 1 6905.85 .03 124.18 .00 10.20 32.26 ) 2 1 2 6905.85 .31 .00 10.77 10.20 32.26 4 0 4 6906.46 .03 124.17 .00 10.20 32.26 i 5 4 5 6906.46 .31 .00 10.78 10.20 32.26 16 12 13 124.00 .45 .00 .25 4.06 40.25 1 31 27 28 62.81 .04 .00 5.12 4.77 38.23' 32 28 29 62.81 5.87 .00 31.73 8.88 186.22 34 304 305 421.56 .57 .00 3.82 11.80 119.06 1 38 36 37 83.51 .07 .00 18.52 6.34 65.99 41 38 39 82.00 .06 .00 17.86 6.22 63.71 47 41 42 83.46 .07 .00 18.50 6.33 65.92 50 43 44 81.70 .06 .00 17.73 6.20 63.27 i

EEP91-d5D A4.75 bo i 3 5 IL ANALYSIS RESULTS FOR "U2SCNRIO" 37 49 50 14.11 .19 .00 27.50 6.25 .194.41 58 50 51 14.11 3.34 .00 10.32 6.25 194.41 59 51 52 28.07 .12 .00 .48 5.85 106.26 62 53 54 13.96 .19 .00 26.93 6.19 190.58 63 54 51 13.96 1.72 .00 10.40 6.19 190.58 79 66 70 3619.71 .20 .00 11.53 6.36 6.73 88 74 75 78.67 .06 .00 16 44 5.97 58.84 i 92 76 77 79.22 .06 .00 16.67 6.01 59.63 97 81 82 79.70 .06 .00 16.87 6.05 60.32 101 83 84 78.37 .06 .00 16.31 5.95 58.40. 105 88 68 393.30 .79 .00 3.07 4.36 9.90 109 90 91 12.91 .16 .00 23.02 5.72 163.95 l 110 91 92 12.91 3.93 .00 19.45 5.72 163.95 111 92 93 25.92 .08 .00 .10 5.40 91.24 I 116 96 97 13.01 .17 .00 23.40 5.77 166.58 117 97 92 13.01 1.87 .00 19.63 5.77 166.58 120 100 101 51.41 .03 .00 3.43 3.90 26.12 121 101 88 51.41 .90 .00 53.96 3.90 26.12 128 109 110 814.56 .01 .00 19.22 5.95 13.93 i, 134 115 116 788.13 .01 .00 15.42 5.75 13.07 146 '25 126 888.63 .01 .00 10.09 5.70 11.87 152 ,31 132 851.96 .01 .00 20.87 5.46 10.95 LIXE 16, IS CLOSED 168 ,55 146 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 LINE 17(.S CLOSED 176 158 146 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 LINE 179 IS CLOSED 182 151 152 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 LINE 185 IS CLOSED 188 163 164 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 197 170 171 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 198 302 165 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 205 177 178 2422.88 .08 705.71 .00 15.54 83.33 213 185 186 2427.12 .08 705.46 .00 15.57 83.61 218 189 190 60.06 7.82 .00 4.11 12.52 462.94 224 195 196 54.28 6.23 .00 3.36 11.31 380.12 233 203 204 4850.00 .03 .00 .00 8.52 11.85 LINE 234 IS CLOSED 235 70 205 3619.71 .0L .00 .30 6.36 6.73 501 86 301 315.97 .02 .00 36.43 3.50 6.52 503. 46 303 330.68 .04 .00 30.16 3.67 7.11 LINE 700 IS CLOSED LINE 701 IS CLOSED LINE 702 IS CLOSED LINE 703-IS CLOSED JUNCTION NUMBER DEMAND CRADE LINE ELEVATION PRESSURE 1 .00 138.15 43.10 42.42 2 .00 127.06 42.40 37.79 14 .00 218.90 26.50 41.24 15 .00 118.90 26.50 41.24 16 .00 118.90 26.50 41.24 18 .00 114.94 36.30 35.10 23 .00 99.86 12.50 38.99 27 .00 87.74 11.00 34.25 1

_d' EER.41-otl2. I L g,j.f[bo l Sqe c, d i2.- j ~ l ANALYSIS RESULTS FOR 'U2SCNRIO* 1 'h 28 .00 82.59 '10.80 - 32.04' I 36 .00-97.90 17.50- -35.88-l 37 .00 79.31' 17.50 27.59 49 .00 89.83

8. 30..

36.39 50 .00 -62.13 8.30 24.03 l 66 .00 .56.11 77.20' -9.42, 70 .00 44.37 74.10 -13.27 l 74 .00 106.09 17.50 39.541 i 75 .00 89.59 17.50-32.18 Ji 90 .00 99.43 31.60 30.28- - j 91 .00 76.25 31.60 19.93 98 .00 110.81 16.80 41.96 il 100 .00 103.19 11.40 40.97 1 101 .00 99.73 28.50 31.79-109 .00 87.89 44.40 19.41 o 110 .00 68.66 44.40-10.83 4 1 143 .00 114.22 72.80 18.49 144 .00 40.58 74.20 -15.01-(! 156 .00 114.15 72.80 18.46 j 157 .00 40.58 74 20 -15.01 a 165 .00 40.57 58.80 -8.14 5 204 4850.00 804.83 33.10 344.45 205 -4850.00 44.07 71'.90 -12.42 302 . 00 40.57 34.20' 2.84: THE NET SYSTEM DEMAND = 124.00' i

SUMMARY

OF INFLOWS (+) ANDLOUTFLOWS(-) FROM FIXED GRADE NODES-- i t PIPE NUMBER FLOWRATE 1 6905.85 4 .6906.46 i 158 -3343.28 a 161 -9398.91 600 -946.14 THE NET FLOW INTO THE SYSTEM FROM FIIED CRADE NODES = 13812.31 2[ THE NET FLOW OUT OF THE SYSTEM INTO FIXED CRADE NODES = -13688.33' i 1A

SUMMARY

OF CONDITIONS-SPECIFIED FOR THE NEXT SIMULATION FOLLOWS 'l t THE FOLLOWING SPECIFIC DEMAND CHANGES ARE MADE : d JUNCTION NUMBER' DEMAND "i 13- '113.00 -i 302 2635.00 1 165 -2635.00: 204- . 00 -- -205- .00 - LINE 4 IS CLOSED LINE 72 IS CLOSED LINE-73 IS CLOSED ~' LINE 74 IS CLOSED .1 l aa v

'EEE-$1-o45b.- A4.75jbo j % 7 e2_ ] } ANALYSIS RESULTS POR 'U2SCNRIO" i j LINE 166 IS OPEN- .LINE 174 IS OPEN j! LINE 179 IS OPEN LINE 185 IS OPEN LINE 205 IS CLOSED LINE 213 IS CLOSED LINE 218 IS CLOSED LINE 224 IS CLOSED LINE 198 IS CLOSED 'i 'LINE 234 IS OPEN 1 f.i THE FOLLOWING CHANGES IN PIPE DATA ARE SPECIFIED I l PIPE NO. NODE NOS. LENGTH DIAMETER ROUGHNESS MINOR LOSS K FIXED CRADE I 2 1 2 9.7 16.6 5.0 6.30 .00 i 5 4 5 9.7 16.6 5.0 6.30. .00 130-111 112. 79.0 5.6 5.0 -53.28 .00 i 136 117 118 100.4 5.6 5.0 .53.61 .00-148 127 128 74.8 5.6 5.0 52.68 .00 l 154 133 134 75.7 5.6 5.0. 53.28 .00 - i THE RESULTS ARE OBTAINED AFTER S TRIALS WITH AN ACCURACY = .00186 -1' U2SCNRIO CHANGE 2: VERIFIES RESULTS OF U2NOPOWR CH. 4'ARE STILL VALID PIPE NO. NODE NOS. FLOWRATE HEAD LOSS PUMP HEAD MINOR LOSS VELOCITY HL/1000 1 0 1 7044.53- .03 121.07 .00 10.40 33.56 2 1 2 7044.53 .33 .00 10.59 '10.40-33.56-LINE 4 IS CLOSED 5 4 5 .00 .00 ~ .00 .00 .00 .00 16 12 13 113.00 .38 .00 .21 3.70 33.45 i 31 27 28 62.63 ,04 .00 5.09 4.75 38.02 32 28 29 62.63 5.83 .00 31.55 8.85, 185.18 34 304 305 420.34 .57 .00 1.81 11.77 118.39 38 36 37 83.27 .07 .00 18.41

6.32 65.62-41 38 39 81.76

.06 .00 17.75

6.21

-63.36 i 47 41 42 83.22 .07 .00 18.39 6.32-65.55 50 43 44-81.47 .06 .00 .11.63 6.18 62.92 i 57 49 50 14.07 .19 .00 27.34 -6.23 193.33 58 50 51-14.07 3.33 .00 10.26-6.23 .193.33' i 59 51 52 27.99 .22 .00 .48 5.83 105.67: 1 62 53 54 13.92 .19 .00 26.78 6.17 1189.53 63-54 51 13.92 1.71' .00 10.34-6.17 189.53= 1 LINE 72 IS CLOSED LINE 73 IS CLOSED LINE 74 IS-CLOSED 179 66 70 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 '. 00 - -88 74 75 79.17 06- .00 16.65 6.01-59.56 92 76 77 79.73 .06 .00 16,88 6.05 60.36 .f 97 81-82 80.21- .06 .00 17.09 6.09: 61.06 2 101 83 84 78.86 .06 .00 16.52 5.99 59.11 1 1

N-hl~ . 7.I

b p e seiz g

ANALYSIS RESULTS FOR 'U2SCNRIO" 105 88 68 394.55 .80 .00 3.09 4.37 9.96 109 90 91 12.89 .16 .00 22.95 5.71 163.49 110 91 92 12.89 3.92 .00 19.39 5.71 163.49 111 92 93 25.89 .08 .00 .10 5.40 91.03 116 96 97 13.00 .17 .00 23.36 5.76 166.26 117 97 92 13.00 1.86 .00 19.59 5.76 166.26 120 100 101 50.69 .03 .00 3.33 3.85 25.42 121 101 88 50.69 .88 .00 52.44 3.85 25.42 128 109 110 600.09 .01 .00 10.43 4.38 7.75 134 115 116 589.88 .01 .00 8.64 4.31 7.50 146 125 126 626.24 .01 .00 5.01 4.02 6.07 152 131 132 614.08 .01 .00 10.84 3.94 5.85 166 143 144 1319.02 .03 755.24 .00 8.46 25.45 168 145 146 1319.02 .05 .00 .20 3.74 3.24 174 156 157 1315.98 .03 755.34 .00 8.44 25.34 176 158 146 1315.98 .10 .00 .23 3.73 3.23 182 151 152 62.58 9.98 .00 6.39 13.04 501.53 188 163 164 59.55 9.06 .00 5.29 12.41 455.34 197 170 171 2635.00 .02 .00 .16 4.63 3.65 LINE 198 IS CLOSED LINE 205 IS CLOSED LINE 213 IS CLOSED LINE 218 IS CLOSED LINE 224 IS CLOSED 233 203 204 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 234 204 205 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 '235 70 205 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 501 86 301 317.97 .02 .00 36.89 3.53 6.60 503 46 303 329.72 .04 .00 29.98 3.66 7.07 LINE 700 IS CLOSED LINE 701 IS CLOSED LINE 702 IS CLOSED LINE 703 IS CLOSED JUNCTION NUMBER DEMAND GRADE LINE ELEVATION PRESSURE 1 .00 135.04 43.10 41.03 2 .00 124.12 42.40 36.47 14 .00 115.63 26.50 39.78 15 .00 115.63 26.50 39.78 16 .00 115.63 26.50 39.78 18 .00 114.86 36.30 35.06 23 .00 99.84 12.50 38.98 27 .00 87.79 11.00 34.27 28 .00 82.66 10.80 32.08 36 .00 97.89 17.50 35.88 37 .00 79.41 17.50 27.63 49 .00 89.86 8.30 36.40 50 .00 62.33 8.30 24.11 66 .00 40.08 -77.20 -16.57 70 .00 40.08 74.10 -15.18 74 .00 105.95 17.50 39.48 75 .00 89.24 17.50 32.02 90 .00 98.45 31.60 29.84 91 .00 75.34 31.60 19.52 98 .00 108.06 16.80 40.73

@-@l-M9 A 4. 5 b C) 3 49 4 a_ ANALYSIS RF.SULTS FOR "U2SChTIO' 200 .00 100.65 11.40 39.83 101 .00 97.29 28.50 30.70 109 .00 99.64 44.40 24.66 110 .00 89.21 44.40 20.00 143 .00 114.10 72.80 18.43 144 .00 869.31 74.20 354.89 156 .00 114.07 72.80 18.42 157 .00 869.39 74.20 354.92 165 -2635.00 41.00 58.80 -7.94 204 .00 40.08 33.10 3.12 205 .00 40.08 71.90 -14.20 302 2635.00 865.49 34.20 371.03 THE NET SYSTEM DEMAND = 113.00 SUMARY OF INFLOWS (+) AND OUTFLOWS (-) FROM FIXED CRADE NODES PIPE NUMBER FLOWRATE 1 7044.53 158 -2430.28 161 -3572.02 600 -929.23 THE NET FLOW INTO THE SYSTEM FROM FIXED GRADE NODES = 7044.53 THE NET FLOW OUT OF THE SYSTEM INTO FIXED CRADE NODES = -6931.53 A

SUMMARY

OF CONDITIONS SPECIFIED FOR THE NEXT SIMULATION FOLLOWS THE FOLLOWING SPECIFIC DEMAND CHANCES ARE MADE : JUNCTION NUMBER DEMAND 13 113.00 302 2800.00 165 -2800.00 204 .00 205 .00 LINE 128 IS CLOSED ~ + LINE 134 IS CLOSED THE FOLLOWING CHANCES IN PIPE DATA ARE SPECIFIED FOR PIPE NUMBER 1 THE VALUE OF THE FIXED GRADE IS CHANGED TO 11.4 FOR PIPE NUMBER 4 THE VALUE OF THE FIXED GRADE IS CHANCED TO 11.4 PIPE NO. NODE NOS. LENGTH DIAMETER ROUCHNESS MINOR LOSS K FIXED GRADE 2 1 2 9.7 16.6 5.0 6.48 .00 5 4 5 9.7 16.6 5.0 6.48_ .00 130: 111 112. '79.0 5.6 5.0 3.28 .00 136 117 118 100.4 5.6 5.0 3.61 .00 148 127 128 74.8 5.6 5.0 2.68 .00 154 133 134 75.7 5.6 5.0 3.28 .00 f

Y~$ #Y$ A4. 75, @.o - T-kylodi2 ANALYSIS RESULTS FOR "U2SCNRIO' 9 THE RESULTS ARE OBTAINED AFTER 3 TRIALS WITH AN ACCURACY =.00100 U2SCNRIO CHANGE 3: VERIFIES RESULTS OF U2TYFOON CH. 2 ARE STILL VALID PIPE NO. NODE NOS. FLOWRATE HEAD LOSS PUMP HEAD MINOR LOSS VELOCITY HL/1000 1 0 1 6895.96 .03 124.40 .00 10.19 32.17 2 1 2 6895.96 .31 .00 10.44 10.19 32.17 LINE 4 IS CLOSED 5 4 5 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 16 12 13 113.00 .38 .00 .21 3.70 33.45 31 27 28 63.11 .04 .00 5.16 4.79 38.58. 32 28 29 63.11 5.92 .00 3?. 03 8.92 187.94 34 304 305 423.55 .58 .00 1.83 11.86 120.16 38 36 37 83.91 .07 .00 18.70 6.37 66.59 41 38 39 82.39 .06 .00 18.03 6.25 64.29 47 41 42 83.86 .07 .00 18.68 6.36 66.52 50 43 44 82.09 .06 .00 -17.90 6.23 63.84 57 49 50 14.17 .20 .00 27.76 6.28 196.18 58 50 51 14.17 3.37 .00 10.42 6.28 196.18 59 51 52 28.20 .12 .00 .48 5.88 107.23 62 53 54 14.03 .19 .00 27.19 6.22 192.32 63 54 51 14.03 1.73 .00 10.50 6.22 192.32 LINE 72 IS CLOSED LINE 73 IS CLOSED LINE 74 IS CLOSED 79 66 70 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 88 74 75 79.82 .06 .00 16.92 6.06 60.50 92 76 77 80.38 .06 .00 17.16 6.10 61.31 97 81 82 80.87 .06 .00 17.37 6.14 62.03 101 83 84 79.51 .06 .00 16.79 6.03 60.05 105 88 68 397.78 .81 .00 3.14 4.41 10.11 109 90 91 12.99 .17 .00 23.33 5.76 166.08 110 91 92 12.99 3.99 .00 19.71 5.76 166.08 111 92 93 26.10 .08 .00 .10 5.44 92.46 116 96 97 13.11 .17 .00 23.74 5.81 168.89 117 97 92 13.11 1.89 .00 19.92 5.81 168.89 120 100 101 51.10 .03 .00 3.39 3.88 25.82 121 101 88 51.10 .89 .00 53.31-3.88 25.82 LINE 128 IS CLOSED LINE 134 IS CLOSED 146 125 126 1111.20 .02 .00 15.78 7.13-18.26-152 131 132 992.57 .01 .00 28.32 6.37 14.69-166 143 144 1401.60 .03 752.61 .00 8.99 28.63 168 145 146 1401.60 .06 .00 .23 3.98 3.64 174 156 157 1398.40 .03 '752.71 00 8.97 28.51 176~ 158 146 1398.40 .11 .00 .26 3.97 3.63 182 151 152 62.31 9.90 .00 6.34 12.99 497.35 188 163-164 59.96 9.18 .00 5.36 12.49 461.38 197 170 171 2800.00 .02 .00 .18 4.92 4.10 LINE 198 IS CLOSED LINE 205 IS CLOSED

t Wh~YS A4. 75 )bn it of 12-P9 ANALYSIS RESULTS FOR "U2SCNRIO" LINE 213 IS CLOSED LINE 218 IS CLOSED LINE 224 IS CLOSED 233 203 204 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 234 204 205 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 235 70 205 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 501 86 301 320.58 .02 .00 37.50 3.55 6.71 503 46 303 332.24 .04 .00 30.44 3.68- '7.18 LINE 700 IS CLOSED LINE 701 IS CLOSED LINE 702 IS CLOSED LINE 703 IS CLOSED JUNCTION NUMBER DEMAND GRADE LINE ELEVATION PRESSURE 1 .00 135.74 43.10 41.35 2 .00 124.99 42.40 36.86 14 .00 116.85 26.50 40.33 15 .00 116.85 26.50 40.33 16 .00 116.85 26.50 40.33 18 .00 116.09 36.30 35.61 23 .00 100.83 12.50 39.43 27 .00 88.60 11.00 34.64 28 .00 83.40 10.80 32.40 36 .00 98.86 17.50 36.31-37 .00 80.09 17.50 27.94 49 .00 90.71 8.30 36.78 50 .00 62.75 8.30 24.30 66 .00 40.09 77.20 -16.56 70 .00 40.09 74.10 -15.18 74 .00 107.04 17.50 39.96 75 .00 90.06 17.50 32.38 90 .00 99.41 31.60 30.27 91 .00 75.92 31.60 19.78 98 .00 109.18 16.80 41.23 100 .00 101.65-11.40 40.28 101 .00 98.24 28.50 31.13 + 109 .00 114.17 44.40 31.14 110 .00 30.29 44.40 -6.30 143 .00 115.23 72.80 18.94 -144 .00 867.81 74.20 354.21 '156 .00 115.20 72.80 18.93 157 .00 867.89 74.20 354.25 165 -2800.00 41.11 58.80 -7.90 204 .00 40.09 33.10 3.12 205 .00 40.09 71.90 -14.20 302 2800.00 863.49 34.20 370.14 THE NET SYSTEM DEMAND = 113.00

SUMMARY

OF INFLOWS (+) AND OUTFLOWS (-) FROM FIXED GRADE NODES PIPE NUMBER FLOWRATE 1 6895.96 158 -2103.77 161 -3743.60 )

EGE C3(-ot4sb Ah7.5,'Pw.o 'Page i2. ct i2 a ' ANALYSIS RESULTS FOR 'U2SCNRIO" i '600 -935.59 THE NET FLOW INTO THE SYSTEM FROM FIXED GRADE NODES = 6895.96 THE NET FLOW OUT OF THE SYSTEM INTO FIIED GRADE NODES = -6782.96 l' 3 ( -) i i l

6 I EER-91-0450. I' Att. 7.lo, Rev. 0- 'l Page_~1 of - (7 -. DATA FILE FOR "U2CALBN2 f f I FLOWRATE IS EXPRESSED IN GPM AE PRESSURE IN PSIG A

SUMMARY

OF THE ORIGINAL DATA FOLLOWS THE DARCY WEISEACH HEAD LOSS EQUATION IS USED, THE KINEMATIC VIS. = 0000070 i J THE SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF THIS LIQUID = 1.03 PIPE NO. NODE NOS. LENGTH DIAMETER ROUGHNESS MINOR LOSS K' FIXED GRADE. (FEET) (INCHES) 1 0 1 1.0 16.6 5.0 .00 21.00 LINE 1 PUMP DATA (HEAD-FLOW): 200.0 .0 135.0 6400.0 '90.0 8300.0-2 1 2 9.7 16.6 5.0' 2.13 3 2 3 15.9 18.6 5.0 7.68-4 0 4 1.0 16.6 5.0 .00 21.00 LINE. 4 PUMP DATA (HEAD-FLOW): 200.0 .0 135.0 '6400.0 90.0 8300.0 5 4 5 9.7 16.6 5.0-1,38 6 5 6 15.9 18.6 5.0 7.68 7 3-6 6.0 28.5 5.0' .06 8 6 7 6.0 28.5 .5.0 06-9 7 8 308.8 28.5 5.0 .48 -j 10 8 18 371.0-28.5 5.0- .84 11 8 9 2.7 -16.6~ 5.0

33 12 9

10 63.7 17.3 .2' .60 13 10 103 124.3 16.6 5.0 .52 14 7 11 1.4 3.5 5.0 .71 15 11 12 3.8 3.5 5.0 3.69 m 16 12 13 11.3 3.5 5.0 .99-17 14 3 7.0 '28.5 5.0 .06 18 15 14 6.1 28.5 5.0 .06 19 16 15 7.0' 28.5 5.0 .06-20 17 16 2.3 28.5 5.0 .00 - 21 306-19 2.3 29.3 .2 .07 22 19 21 9.1 22.5 5.0 .79 23~ 19 20 11.4 29.3

2 1.49 24 55 24.1 19.3

.2 .68 25 18 22 28.1 6.1 .2 2.76 26 22 23 15.5 6.1 .2 30.30 27 23-24 6.5 6.1 .2 .18: 28 24 25 111.6 6.1 .2 2.63 29 25 -' -26 67.3 3.8- .2 -.22 30 26' 27 40.8 1.7 .2 3.46 31 27 '28 1.0 2.3 .2 14.50 32 ~28 29 31.5 1.7 .2 25.93' 4 w g ~v -ww e - - - - w g

l - i EER-91-0450 Att.' 7.6, Rev. 0. .Page' ~ 2 of.12~ DATA FILE FOR "U2CALBN2" ~i q 33 29 30 1.2 3.8 .2 17.02-34 304 305 4.8 3.8 .2 .84 35 23 32 13.1 6.1 .2 .81 36 33 34 1.3 3.0 .2 .54 37 34 36 8.2 2.3 .2 .74 38 36 37 1.0 2.3 .2 29.70 1 39 37 40 7.0 2.3 .2 1.13 l 40 34 38 7.2-2.3 .2 1.17 i 41 38 39 1.0 2.3 .2 29.70 42 39 40 7.1 2.3 .2 2.03 i 43 40 45 5.0 3.0 .2 .69 44 32 33 5.0 6.1 .2 .48 I 45 33 35 2.8 3.0 .2 .79 46 35 41 9.2 2.3 .2 .74 47 41 42 1.0 2.3 .2 29.70 48 42 45 7.0 2.3 .2 2.06 49 35 43 7.9 2.3 .2-1.76 50 43 44 1.0 2.3 .2 29.70 i 51 44 46 8.0 2.3 .2 2.60-52-45 46 1.5 6.1 .2 .12 53 303 47 20.8 6.1 .2 .93 ) 54 47 30-200.0 6.1 .2 3.33-55 24 48 3.5 1.4 .2 .85 l 56 48 49 11.0 1.0 .2 11.64 i 57 49 50 1.0 1.0 .2 45.30 ~! 58 50 51 17.2 1.0 .2-17.00- .59 51 52 1.1 1.4 .2 .90 60 52 47 2.9 1.4 .2 1.73 61 48 53 19.0 1.0 .2 12.94 62 53 54 1.0 1.0 .2 45.30 63 54 51 9.0 1.0 .2 17.50 64 31 139 47.4 18.6 5.0 .08 65 22 71 125.1 6.1 .2 3.02 66 55 56 104.2 18.6 5.0 12.71 67 56 57 14.9 18.6 5.0 .60 68 57 58 5.0 18.6-5.0 .30 69 57 59 16.1 14.6 5.0 .67 70 58 60 16.1 12.6 5.0 .47 i '71 38 61 18.3 14.6 5.0 1.02 72 59 62 1.0 14.6 .2 21.80 73 60 63 1.0 14.6 .2 21.80 74 61 64 1.0 14.6 2 21.80 75 62 65 12.5 15.3 .2 .51 76 63 65 10.9 13.3 .2 .37 77 64 66-13.3 15.3 .2 .87 78 65 66 '5.7 15.3 .2 .08 79: 66 70 29.5 15.3 .2-218.95-LINE 79.IS CLOSED 80 205 69 9.3" 15.3- .2 .62 -81 69 68 30.2 28.5 5.0 1.82 82 68 137 36.9 '28.5 5.0 .04 83 71 98 51.2 6.1 .2 2.85 84. 98 67 2.9 6.1 .2 .63 1

i L l 7 f EER-91-0450 i ! Att.7.(,, nev.J0 1 Page

3. _ of - Q DATA FILE FOR "U2CALBN2" l:;

85 71 72 8.2 6.1 .2 .36 86 72 300 37.1 6.1 .2 1.17 87. 73 74 9.8 2.3 .2 1.35 88 74 75 1.0 2.3 .2 29.70 o 89 75 78 7.2 2.3 .2 1.76 1 90 73 79 .9 6.1 .2 .12 L 91 79 76 8.5 2.3 .2 1.08 i 92 76 77 1.0 2.3 .2 29.70-93 77 78 8.6 2.3 .2 1.51 94 78 85 4.7 3.0 .2 .57 i 95 79 80 1.2. '3.0 .2 1.13 96 80 81 9.1 2.3 .2 1'.01 97 81 .82 1.0 2.3 .2 ~29.70 98 82 85 7.5 2.3 .2 .81 99 85. 86 4.2 6.1 .2 -. 4 2 - l 100 80 83 9.2 2.3 .2 1.35 101 83 84 1.0 2.3 .2 29.70 102 84 86. 8.4 2.3 .2 1.62 103 301 87 27.5 6.1 .2 1.17 l 104 87 88. 606.1 6.1 .2 4.82 105 88 68 80.2 6.1 .2 10.40 i 106 72 102-12.5 1.7 .2 .60 .107 -102 89 -2.9 1.4 .2 .73-108' 89 90 13.0 1.0 .2 12.28 109 90 91 1.0 l '. 0 .2 45.30 110 91 92. 24.0 1.0 .2 -38.28 111-92 93 .9 1.4 .2 .22 1 112 93 94 2.9 1.4 .2 1.35 113 _94 95 18.7 1.7 .2 1.20-114 95' 87 .9 1.7- .2 1.67. 115 89 .96 20.3 1.0 .2 12.46 i 116 96 97 1.0 1.0 .2 '45.30 117 '97-92 11.2 1.0 .2 ~ 38.00 118 98 99 ~101.9 3.8 .2 1.46 119 99 100 35.0 1.7 .2 3.57-120 100 121. 101 - 101 1.0 2.3 .2 14.50 88 -34.5 2.3 .2-228.27 i 1 ~122 .120 104 31.0 16.6-5.0 .89 '123 104 105 5.4 16.6 5.0- .89 .{ -124 105 106 .8 16.6 5.0 .00 t '125 104 107 56.3 5.6 5.0 4.01 I n 126 107 108 12.7 5.6 -5.0 .73 L -127 108 109 ~1.9

7. 5 5.0

.76 128 109 110 1.0 7.5 .2 35.00 LINE-128 IS.C1.OSED I 129 -110 :lli-1.9 7.5 5.0- .98-1 -130

111 112 79.0

.5.6 5.0. ..3.28 131 105 113 79.8 5.6 5.0 ' 4.34 - -l 132-113.114 12.0' 5. 6 5.0 .73 -{ 133-114 115 1.9 7.5' 5.0 .76 134 115' 116-1.0 7.5 .2~ 30.00 LIllE 134 IS CLOSED 135 116 117 1.9 7.5-5.0 .98 l 4 .I a r

EER-91-0450 A t t. 7.la, Rev. 0-Page 4 of 11 DATA FILE FOR "U2CALBN2" 136 117 118 100.4 5.6 5.0 3.61 137 119 118 .8 16.6 5.0 .00 138 118 112 .8 16.6 5.0 .07 139 112 136 26.8 16.6 5.0 .45 140 103 120 18.9 16.6 5.0 35.41 141 103 121 12.0 16.6 5.0 35.41 142 121 122 3.1 5.6 5.0 .00 143 120 123 58.0 5.6 5.0 4.00 144 123 124 13.7 5.6 5.0 .73 145 124 125 1.7 7.5 5.0 .76 146 125 126 1.0 8.0 .2 20.00 147 126 127 1.9 7.5 5.0 1.48 148 127 128 74.8 5.6 5.0 2.68 149 121 129 54.5 5.6 5.0 4.01 150 129 130 16.3 5.6 5.0 .91 151 130 131 1.7 7.5 5.0 .50 152 131 132 1.0 8.0 .2 45.00 153 132 133 1.9 7.5 5.0 .98 154 133 134 75.7 5.6 5.0 3.28 155 135 134 2.3 16.6 5.0 .00 156 134 128 30.8 16.6 5.0 .07 157 128 136 4.3 16.6 5.0 .45 158 136 0 414.1 16.6 5.0 .96 28.90 159 137 138 16.4 28.5 5.0 .92 - 160 139 138 126.7 18.6 5.0 .64 161 138 0 286.2 34.5 5.0 1.13 40.00 162 21 140 27.2 22.5 5.0 .20 163 140 141 6.5 12.6 5.0 .34 164 141 142 4.3 12.6 5.0 .12 165 142 143 4.3 8.0 .2 .32 166 143 144 1.0 8.0 .2 .00 LINE 166 PUMP DATA (HEAD-FLOW): 775.0 .0 580.0 4000.0 500.0 4725.0 LINE 166 IS CLOSED 167 144 1*5 9.9 12.0- .2 3.76 168 145 146 16.7 12.0 .2 .93 169 140 153 16.0 22.5 5.0 .06 170 153 173 21.5 22.5 5.0 .30 171 153 154 6.5 12.6 5.0 .44 172 154 155 4.3 12.6 5.0 .12 173 155 156 4.3 8.0 .? .32 174 156 157 1.0 8.0 .2 .00 LINE 174 PUNP DATA (HEAD-FLOW): 775.0 .0 580.0 4000.0 500.0 4725.0 LINE 174 IS CLOSED 175 157 158 9.8 12.0 .2 3.76 176 158 146 31.4 12.0 .2 1.07 177 141 147 .8 1.7 .2 .20 178 147 148 .5 1.7 .2 .07 179 148 149 17.2 1.4 .2 1.69 LINE 179 IS CLOSED 180 149 150 .7 1.7 .2 26.27 181 150 151 2.2 1.4 .2 2.12 182 151 152 19.9 1.4 .2 2.42 183 154 159 .8 1.7 5.0 .69 J

EER-91-0450 Att. T6, Rev. O Page 5-of 11 DATA FILE FOR "U2CALEN2" 184 159 160 .5 1.7 .2 .07 185 160 161 17.2 1.4 .2 1.69 LINE 185 IS CLOSED 186 161 162 1.0 1.7 .2 26.57 187 162 163 2.7 1.4 .2 3.70 188 163 164 19.9 1.4 .2 2.21 189 193 164 21.2 3.0 .2 .32 190 164 152 16.7 3.0 .2 .54 191 152 165 117.8 3.0 .2 4.45 192 146 166 156.0 16.0 .2 1.15 193 166 167 18.7 16.0 .2 .44 194 167 168 10.5 15.3 .2 .14 195 168 169 2.5 15.3 .2 .00 196 169 170 1.0 19.3 .2 11.50 197 170 171 5.0 15.3 .2 .48 198 302 165 205.0 15.3 .2 482.00 199 165 172 7.5 19.3 .2 .00 200 172 31 31.0 18.6 5.0 .07 201 173 174 1.0 12.6 5.0 .00 202 174 175 4.7 13.3 .2 .10 203 175 176 4.3 13.3 .2 .22 204 176 177 4.2 8.0 .2 .32 205 177 178 1.0 8.0 .2 .00 LINE 205 PUHP DATA (HEAD-FLOW): 775.0 .0 580.0 4000.0 500.0 4725.0 206 178 179 9.8 12.0 .2 3.76 207 179 180 27.9 12.0 .2 .46 208 173 181 16.0 22.5 5.0 .22 209 181 182 .4 12.6 5.0 .00 210 182 183 4.8 13.3 .2 .00 211 183 184 4.4 13.3 .2 .12 212 184 185 4.2 8.0 .2 .32 213 185 186 1.0 8.0 .2 .00 LINE 213 PUMP DATA (HEAD-FLOW): 775.0 .0 580.0 4000.0 500.0 4725.0 214 186 187 10.4 12.0 .2 3.76 215 187 180 17.4 12.0 .2 .29 216 175 188 1.0 1.7 .2 .49 217 188 189 .3 1.4 .2 .07 218 189 190 16.9 1.4 .2 1.69 219 190 191 1.0 1.7 .2 26.85 220 191 192 2.3 1.4 .2 2.80 221 192 193 19.5 1.4 .2 2.44 222 183 194 4 1.7 .2 .49 223 194 195 .7 1.4 .2 .07 224 195 196 16.4 1.4 .2 1.69 225 196 197 1.0 1.7 .2 26.55 226 197 198 2.9 1.4 .2 2.41 227 198 193 39.2 1.4 .2 5.21 228 180 199 212.5 15.3 .2 1.33 229 199 20C 2.5 15.3 .2 .25 230 200 201 2.5 19.3 .2 .00 231 201 202 1.0 19.3 .2 11.50 232 202 203 2.5 19.3 .2 .19 233 203 204 2.5 15.3 .2 .00 1

f .l 1 i EER-91-0450 t Att. 7do r Rev.10 ' i 'Page' -- 6 of > l2. I -] DATA FILE FOR "U2CALEN2" l 234' 204' 205 235.1 15.3 .2 .1814.60-LINE 234 IS CLOSED 235 70 205 .7 15.3 .2 .48 7 500-300 1 73 4.8 6.1 .2 .76 501 86 301 2.3-6.1 .2 191.23 ~' 502 171 302 .4 15.3 .2 .00 503 46 303-5.8 6.1 .2 144.52 504 30 304 1.5 3.8 .2- .00-505 305 31 32.9 6.1 .2 1.94 l 506 18 306 103.8 28.5 5.0- .08 i 600 17 0

1. 0 -

18.6 5.0 33547.00-161.30 700 140 146 58.0 11.3 .2 -6.24 LINE 700 IS CLOSED l 701 153 146' 58.0 11.3 .2 6.24 LINE '701 IS CLOSED 702 173 180 58.0 11.3 .2' 6.24 LINE 702 IS CLOSED 703 181 180 58.0 11.3 .2 6.24 LINE 703 IS. CLOSED A SUCCESSFUL CE0 METRIC VERIFICATION HAS BEEN COMPLETED 4 JUNCTION NUMBER DEMAND ELEVATION CONNECTING PIPES 1 .00 43.10 -1 2 j 2 .00 42.40 2 3 3 .00-26.50 3 7 17 4 .00 43.10 4 5 5 .00 42.40 5 6 6 .00 26.50 .6 7 8 7 .00 26.50 8 9 14 8 .00 26.50 9 10 '11 f 9 .00 29.20 11 12' 10 .00 31.80 12 13 11 .00 24.60 14 15 12 .00 24.60 15 16 'l 13 .00 24.60 16 14 .00 26.50 17 18 - i 15 .00 26.50 18 19-16 .00. 26.50-19 20 17 .00 26.50 20 600 18 .00 36.30 10 25 506 19 .00 81 50 21 22 23 i 20 .00 81.50 23 24 21 .00 81.50 22 162 l 22 .00 ~ 19.10 12 5 26-65 23 .00 12.50-26 27 35-24 .00 12.50 27 28 55 s 25 .00 33.80 28 29 26 .00 34.50 29 30 1 27 .00 11.00 30 31 i 28 .00 10.80-31 32 29 .00 32.30 32 33

I n 1-! EER-91-0450 II ~ Att.'Z(e, Rev.- 0 Page 7 of - 12 l a DATA FILE FOR "U2CALBN2H i e 30 .00 23.20 33 54-'504-1 31 .00-35.50 64' 200 ;505 32 .00 12.50 35 44 a 33 .00 12.50 36 44 45 l 34 .00 12.50 36 37 40- ~ 35 .00 12.50 45 46 49 j 36 .00 17.50 37 .38 37 .00 17.50 38 39 38 .00 17.50 40 '41 39 .00 17.50 41 42 40 .00 14.20 39 42 43 41 .00 17.40 -46 47; j 42 .00 17.40 47 48 43 .00 17.40 49 50 44 .00 17.40 50 51 45 .00 14.20 43 .48' 52 4 46 .00 14.20 51-52 503 47 .00 10.80 53 '54 60 e 48 .00 12.50 55 56 61 49 .00 8.30-56 57 50 .00-8.30 57 58 51 .00 10.80 58 59 63 i 52 .00 10.80 59 60 53 .00-B.30 61 62 54 .00 8.30 62 63 55 .00-81.50 24 66 56 .00 81.50 66 67 . 69 ~! 1 57 - .00 79.00 67 68 58- .00 79.00 68 70 71 59 .00 174.80 69 72-I 60 .00 '74.80 .70-73 j 61 .00 74.80 71 17 4 i 62 .00 74.80' 72 75 j 63 .00 74.80 73 76 64 .00 74.80 74 77- .j 65 .00 77.20 75 76-78-66 3500.00 77.20-77 78-79 l 67 .00 16.80 84' 1 68 .00 35.50 81 -82 105-I 69 .00 65.80 80 81-70 -3500.00-74.10 79 235 'l 71 .00 .10 65-83 85 l 72 .00 .10 85 86 -106 73 .00-16.10 87 90 -500-74 .00 17.50-87-88 75' .00 17.50 88' 89-76 .00 ?17.50 91 92. 77 .00 17.50-92 93 _I 78 .00 14.20 89 93 94 I 79 .00 16.10 90 91-95 i 80 .00 16.10 95 96 '100 .l 81 .00 17.40. 96 97 i 82 .00 17.60 97 98 i

... ~. i l' l-1 EER-91-0450; I L Att. 7.(,', - Rev. O Page -e of 12.. II DATA FILE FOR "U2CALBN2H-1 83 .00 17.40 100 101 j 84 .00 17.60 101 -102 85- .00 14.20 94-98 99 86 .00 14.20 99 102 501-j 87' .00 20.90 103 104 114 88. .00 33.20 104 105 121 89 .00 14.20 107 108 115 90 .00 31.60 108 109-91 .00 31.60 109 '110 92 .00 12.10 110 111 117 93 .00 12.10 111 112 94 .00 23.00 112 113 95 .00 21.00 113 114 96 .00 8.30 115~ 116 'f 97 .00 8.30 116 117 98 .00. 16.80 -83 84 -118 99 .00 34.50 118 119 100 .00 11.40 119. 120-101 .00 28.50 120 121 102- .00 14.20 106 '107 103 .00 34.50 13 140 141 i 104 .00-34.50 122 123 125' .) 105 .00 34.50 123 124 131 106- .00. 34.50 124 107 .00 43.80 .125.126. 108 .00 42.90: '126 127-109 .00-44.40 127 128 110 .00' 44.40-128 129. 111 .00 44.50 129 130 112 .00 34.50

130' 138 139 113

.00 43.80. 131 132 114 .00 42.90 132 133 115 .00 44.40 133' 134 116 .00 .44.40 134 '135 117 .00 ' 44.30 135 136 118 .00 34.50 136. 137 138 119 .00 34.50 137-120 .00 34.50 122-140 143 121 .00 34.50

141 -142 149 122

.00 34.50-142-123 .00 47 30 -143 144 124 .00 43.80 144 145 125 .00 44.40 145 146 126 .00 44.40 146 147 127- .00 43.80' -147-148 '128 .00 - 34.50 148': 156~ 157-129 .00 43.80 149 150 130 .00 '43.80 150 151 .131 .00 - 44.40 -151' 152 132 .00 '44.40 152 153- '133 .00 43.80' 153 154

134

.00 34.50 154 155. 156 -135- .00-34.50 155

n r s i EER-91-0450- 'Att. M,~Rev. OT r Page.Of l'2 '- ( DATA FILE FOR HU2CALBN2" i 1 136 .00 34.50 139 157 158 I 137 .00 19.30 82 159 i 138 .00 19.30 159 160 161 i 139 00 19.30 - 64 160 1 140 .00 81.50 162 163 169 700 141 .00 75.00 163 164 177 142 .00 72.80 164 165 143 .00 72.80 165 166 144 .00 74.20 166-167-l 145 .00 77.50 167 168-l 146 .00 81.20 168 176 192 700 701-147 .00 75.00 177 178 9 148 .00 75.00 178 179 149 .00 73.80 179 180 t 150 .00 73.90 180 181. ~ 151 .00 74.30 181 182 152 .00 63.50 182 190 191 i 153 .00 81.50 169 170 171 701 ~ 154 .00 75.00 171 172 183 155 .00 72.80 172 173 156 .00 72.80 173 174 i 157 .00 74.20 174 158 .00 77.50 175 - 175 176 1 159 .00 75.00 183 184 i 160 .00 ~ 75.00 184 185 161 .00 73.80 185 186' 162 .00 73.90 186 187 l 163 .00 74.30 187 188 164 .00 63 50 188 189 190 165 .00 58.80 191 198 199 166 .00 46.80-192 167 .00 34.20 193 - 193

i 194 168

.00 34.20 194 195 0 169 .00 34.20 195 196 170 .00 34.20 196 197 171 .00 34.20 197 502 172 .00 51.00 199,200-l 173 .00 81.50 170 201-208 702 i 174 .00 -79.60 201 ~202 175 .00 75.00 202 203' 216 i 176- .00 72.80 203 204 l 177 .00 72.80 204 205 178 .00-74.10 205 206-179 .00 77.50 .206 207 180 .00 77.50 207 215 228 702 703 181 .00 81.50 208 209 703. 182 .00 179.80-209 210 -l 183- .00. 75.00 210 211 222 184 .00. 72.80 211 212 185' .00 72.80-212 213- -l 186 .00 74.10 213 :214. 187 .00' 77.50 214,215 188 .00 .75.00- .216 217 1 1 l 1

EER-91-0450 l l-Att.7.(>, Rev. O Page 10 of 12. DATA FILE FOR "U2CALEN2" 189 .00 75.00 217 218 190 .00 73.40 218 219 191 .00 73.40 219 220 192 .00 74.30 220 221 193 .00 63.50 189 221 227 194 .00 75.00 222 223 195 .00 75.00 223 224 196 .00 73.40 224 225 197 .00 73.40 225 226 198 .00 74.08 226 227 199 .00 33.10 228 229 200 .00 33.10 229 230 201 .00 33.10 230 231 202 .00 33.10 231 232 203 .00 33.10 232 233 204 3000.00 33.10 233 234 205 -3000.00 71.90 80 234 235 300 .00 16.00 86 500 301 .00 14.20 103 501 302 .00 34.20 198 502 303 .00 12.50 53 503 304 .00 33.20 34 504 305 .00 33.20 34 505 306 .00 81.50 21 506 OUTPUT SELECTION: THE FOLLOVING RESULTS'ARE OUTPUT RESULTS ARE OUTPUT FOR ALL PIPES WITH PLMPS - CLOSED PIPES ARE NOTED RESULTS ARE OUTPUT FOR THE FOLLOWING PIPES : 5 2 16 31 34 38 41 47 50 57 '62 79 88 92 97 101 105 109 116 120 RESULTS ARE OUTPUT FOR THE FOLLOWING PIPES : 128 134 146 152 168 176 182 188 198 501 503 32 58 63 110 117 121 218 224 234 RESULTS ARE OUTPUT FOR THE FOLLOWING PIPES : 59 111 235 197 233 RESULTS ARE OUTPUT FOR THE FOLLOWING JUNCTION NODES : 1 2 14 15 16 27 28 36 37 49 50 66 70 74' 75 RESULTS ARE OUTPUT FOR THE FOLLOWINO JUNCTION NODES : 90 91 100 101 109 110 143 144 156 157 18 23 98 165 302 RESULTS ARE OUTPUT FOR THE FOLLOWING JUNCTION NODES. 204 205 THIS SYSTEM HAS 247 PIPES WITH 212 JUNCTIONS, 31 LOOPS AND 5 FCNS TERMINATION DUE EITHER TO THE DETICTICN OF AN ERROR OR USER INSTRUCTIONS A SLHMARY OF CONDITIONS SPECIFIED FOR THE NEXT SIMULATION FOLLOWS

EER-91-0450 Att. 7,la, Rev. O Page 11 of 12. DATA FILE FOR "U2CALBN2" THE FOLLOWING SPECIFIC DEMAND CHANCES ARE MADE : JUNCTION NLMBER DE}'AND 204 .00 205 .00 302 3000.00 165 -3000.00 LINE 166 IS OPEN LINE 174 IS OPEN LINE 179 IS OPEN LINE 185 IS OPEN LIhT 205 IS CLOSED LINE 213 IS CLOSED LINE 218 IS CLOSED LINE 224 IS CLOSED LINE 234 IS OPEN LINE 198 IS CLOSED THE FOLLOWING CHANGES IN PIPE DATA ARE SPECIFIED FOR PIPE NUMBER 1 THE VALUE OF THE FIXED CRADE IS CHANGED TO 19.2 FOR PIPE NUMBER 4 THE VALUE OF THE FIXED CRADE IS CHANGED TO 19.2 FOR PIPE NUMBER 600 THE VALUE OF THE FIXED CRADZ. IS CHANCED TO 160.0 PIPE NO. NODE NOS. LENGTH DIAMETER ROUCHNESS MINOR LOSS K FIXED CRADE 2 1 2 9.7 16.6 5.0 2.15 .00 5 4 5 9.7 16.6 5.0 1.40 .00 l A SLHMARY OF CONDITIONS SPECIFIED FOR THE NIXT SIMULATION FOLLOWS i LINE 166 IS CLOSED LINE 174 IS CLOSED LINE 179 IS CLOSED LINE 185 IS CLOSED LINE 205 IS OPEN LINE 213 IS OPER ) LINE 218 IS OPEN i LINE 224 IS OPEN i LINE 198 IS OPEN LINE 234 IS CLOSED THE FOLLOWING CHANCES IN PIPE DATA ARE SPECIFIED FOR PIPE NLMBER 600 THE VALUE OF THE FIXED CRADE IS CHANGED TO 49.8 FOR PIPE NLHBER 1 THE VALUE OF THE FIXED CRADE IS CHANCED TO 18.6 i

[ -; j .i 'i 1 i f EER-91-0450 Att. 76, Rev. 0 - p. Page. 12-of ~d -? .f DATA FILE FOR HU2CALBN2" l l i FOR PIPE NUMBER 4 THE VALUE OF THE FIXED CRADE IS CHANCED TO 18.6 I i PIPE NO. NODE NOS. LENGTH DIAMETER ROUCHNESS MINOR LOSS K. FIXED GRADE i l 2 1 2 9.7 16.6 5.0 1.90 .00 .I 5 4 5 9.7 16.6 5.0 1.48 400 ~ ' 3 t 1 i i 1 i i i f if 1 .j I l l l 1 b 1' i s -t

13DC-91-cx15b Ath v.7 42u o %y l 3s 12. 3A% NLE. Ett 'll2.St#M" FLOWRATE IS EXPRESSED IN CPM AND PRESSURE IN PSIG A

SUMMARY

OF THE ORIGINAL DATA FOLLOWS THE DARCY WEISBACH HEAD LOSS EQUATION IS USED, THE KINEMATIC VIS. =.0000070 THE SPECIFIC CRAVITY OF THIS LIQUID = 1.03 PIPE NO. NODE NOS. LENGTH DIAMETER ROUCHNESS MINOR LOSS K FIXED CRADE (FEET) (INCHES) 1 0 1 1.0 16.6 5.0 .00 11.37 LINE 1 PUMP DATA (HEAD-FLOW): 200.0 .0 135.0 6400.0 90.0 8300.0 2 1 2 9.7 16.6 5.0 90.25 3 2 3 15.9 18.6 5.0 7.68 4 0 4 1.0 16.6 5.0 .00 11.37 LINE 4 PUMP DATA (HEAD-FLOW): 200.0 .0 135.0 6400.0 .90.0 8300.0 5 4 5 9.7 16.6 5.0 90.25 + 6 5 6 15.9 18.6 5.0 7.68 7 3 6 6.0 28.5 5.0 .06 8 6 7 6.0 28.5 5.0 .06 9 7 8 308.8 28.5 5.0 .48 10 8 18 371.0 28.5 5.0 .84 11 8 9 2.7 16.6 5.0 .33 12 9 10 63.7 17.3 .2 .60 13 10 103 124.3 16.6 5.0 .52 14 7 11 1.4 3.5 5.0 .71 15 11-12 3.8 3.5 5.0 3.69 16 12 13 11.3 3.5 5.0 .99 17 14 3 7.0 28.5 5.0 .06 18 15 14 6.1 28.5 5.0 .06 19 16 15 7.0 28.5 5.0 .06 20 17 16 2.3 28.5 5.0 .00 21 306 19 2.3 29.3 .2 .07 22 19 21 9.1 22.5 5.0 .79 23 19 20 11.4 29.3 .2 1.49 24 20 55 24.1 19.3 .2 .68 25 18 22 28.1 6.1 .2 2.76 26 22 23 15.5 6.1 .2 30.30 27 23 24 6.5 6.1 .2 .18 28 24 25 111.6 6.1 .2 2.63 29 25 26 67.3 3.8 .2 .22 30 26 27 40.8 1.7 .2 3.46 31 27 28 1.0 2.3 .2 -14.50 LINE 31 IS CLOSED 32 28 29 31.5 1.7 .2 25.93 33 29 30 1.2 3.8 .2 17.02 34 304 305 4.8 3.8 .2 .84 35 23' 32. 13.1 6.1 .2 .81 36 33 34. 1.3 3.0 .2 .54 37 34 36 8.2 2.3 .2 .74 38 36 37 1.0 2.3 .2 29.70 39 37 40 7.0 2.3 .2 1.13 40 34 38 7.2 2.3 .2 1.17 41 38 39 1.0 2.3 .2 29.70 ~! 42 39 40 7.1 2.3 .2 2.03

t l l EER-91-0450 Attl%7, Rev. O Page 2 of fg[ DATA FILE FOR 'U2SCNRIO" 43 40 45 5.0 3.0 .2 .69 44 32 33 5.0 6.1 .2 .48 45 33 35 2.8 3.0 .2 .79 46 35 41 9.2 2.3 .2 .74 47 41 42 1.0 2.3 .2 29.70 48 42 45 7.0 2.3 .2 2.06 49 35 43 7.9 2.3 .2 1.76 50 43 44 1.0 2.3 .2 29.70 51 44 46 8.0 2.3 .2 2.60 52 45 46 1.5 6.1 .2 .12 53 303 47 20.8 6.1 .2 .93 54 47 30 200.0 6.1 .2 3.33 55 24 48 3.5 1.4 .2 .85 56 48 49 11.0 1.0 .2 11.64 57 49 50 1.0 1.0 .2 45.30 LINE 57 IS CLOSED 58 50 51 17.2 1.0 .2 17.00 59 51 52 1.1 1.4 .2 .90 60 52 47 2.9 1.4 .2 1.73 61 48 53 19.0 1.0 .2 12.94 62 53 54 1.0 1.0 .2 45.30 LINE 62 IS CLOSED 63 54 51 9.0 1.0 .2 17.50 64 31 139 47.4 18.6 5.0 .08 65 22 71 125.1 6.1 .2 3.02 66 55 56 104.2 18.6 5.0 12.71 67 56 57 14.9 18.6 5.0 .60 68 57 58 5.0 18.6 5.0 .30 69 57 59 16.1 14.6 5.0 .67 70 58 60 16.1 12.6 5.0 .47 1 71 58 61 18.3 14.6 5.0 1.02 72 59 62 1.0 14.6 .2 21.80 LINE 72 IS CLOSED 73 60 63 1.0 14.6 .2 21.80 LINE 73 IS CLOSED 74 61 64 1.0 14.6 .2 21.80 i LINE 74 IS CLOSED 75 62 65 12.5 15.3 .2 .51 1 76 63 65 10.9 13.3 .2 .37 77 64 66 13.3 15.3 .2 .87 78 65 66 5.7 15.3 .2 .08 79 66 70 29.5 15.3 .2 218.95 80 205 69 9.3 15.3 .2 .62 81 69 68 30.2 28.5 5.0 1.82 82 68 137 36.9 28.5 5.0 .04 83 71 98 51.2 6.1 .2 2.85 84 98 67 2.9 6.1 .2 .63 85 71 72 8.2 6.1 .2 .36 86 72 300 37.1 6.1 .2 1.17 87 73 74 9.8 2.3 .2 1.35 88 74 75 1.0 2.3 .2 29.70 LINE 88 IS CLOSED 89 75 78 7.2 2.3 .2 1.76 90 73 79 .9 6.1 .2 .12 91 79 76 8.5 2.3 .2 1.08

i EER-91-0450 Att.~J.7, Rev. O t Page 3 of 12. DATA ?ILE FOR 'U2SCNRIO" i 92 76 77 1.0 2.3 .2 29.70 LIhT 92 IS CLOSED 93 77 78 8.6 2.3 .2 1.51 94 78 85 4.7 3.0 .2 .57 95 79 80 1.2 3.0 .2 1.13 96 80 81 9.1 2.3 .2 1.01 97 81 82 1.0 2.3 .2 29.70 LINE 97 IS CLOSED 98 82 85 7.5 2.3 .2 .81 99 85 86 4.2 6.1 .2 .42 100 80 83 9.2 2.3 .2 1.35 101 8? 84 1.0 2.3 .2 29.70 LINE 101 I' CLOSED 102 84 86 8.4 2.3 .2 1.62 103 301 87 27.5 6.1 .2 1.17 104 87 88 606.1 6.1 .2 4.82 105 88 68 80.2 6.1 .2 10.40 106 72 102 12.5 1.7 .2 .60 107 102 89 2.9 1.4 .2 .73 108 89 90 13.0 1.0 .2 12.28 109 90 91 1.0 1.0 .2 45.30 LINI 109 IS CLOSED 110 91 92 24.0 1.0 .2 38.28 111 92 93 .9 1.4 .2 .22 112 93 94 2.9 1.4 .2 1.35 113 94 95 18.7 1.7 .2 1.20 114 95 87 .9 1.7 .2 1.67 115 89 96 20.3 1.0 .2 12.46 116 96-97 1.0 1.0 .2 45.30 LINE 116 IS CLOSED 117 97 92 11.2 1.0 .2 38.00 118 98 99 101.9 3.8 .2 1.46 119 99 100 35.0 1.7 .2 3.57 120 100 101 1.0 2.3 .2 14.50 LINE 120 IS CLOSED 121 101 88 34.5 2.3 .2 228.27 122 120 104 31.0 16.6 5.0 .89 ) 123 104 105 5.4 16.6 5.0 .89 124 105 106 .8 16.6 5.0 .00 125 104 107-56.3 5.6 5.0 4.01 126 107 108 12.7 5.6 5.0 .73 127 108 109 1.9 7.5 5.0 .76. 128 109 110 1.0 7.5 .2 35.00 i LINE 128 IS CLOSED 129 110 111 1.9 7.5 5.0 .98 130 111 112 79.0 5.6 5.0 3.28 131 105 113 79.8-5.6 5.0 4.34 132 113 114 12.0 5.6 5.0 .73 133 114 115 1.9 7.5 5.0 .76 134 115 116 1.0 7.5 .2 30.00 l LINE 134 IS CLOSED 135 116 117 1.9 7.5 5.0 .98 136 117 118 100.4 5.6 5.0 3.61 137 119 118 .8 16.6 5.0 .00 138 118 112 .8 16.6 5.0 .07 i i

3 EER-91-0450.. AttJ7.7, Rev. 0 Page 4 of f ;L. DATA FILE FOR 'U2SCNRIO"- l t 139 112 136 26.8 16.6 -5.0 .45 140 103 120 18.9 16.6 5.0-35.41 141 103 121 12.0 16.6 5.0 35.41 142 121 122 3.1 5.6 5.0 .00 i 143 120 123 58.0 5.6 5.0 4.00 i 144 123 124 13.7 5.6 5.0 .73' 145 124 125 1.7 7.5 5.0 .76 i 146 125 126 1.0 8.0 .2 20.00 147 126 127 1.9 7.5 5.0 1.48 148 127 128 74.8 5.6 5.0 2.68 149 121 129 54.5 5.6 5.0 4.01 150 129 130 16.3 5.6 5.0 .91 151 130 131 1.7 7.5 5.0 .50 152 131 132 1.0 8.0 .2 45.00 153 132 133 1.9 7.5 5.0 .98 154 133 134 75.7 5.6 5.0 3.28 155 135 134 2.3 16.6 5.0 .00 t 156 134 128 30.8 16.6 5.0 .07 157 128 136 4.3 16.6 5.0 .45 t 158 136 0 414.1 16.6 5.0 .96 28.90 t 159 137 138 16.4 28.5' 5.0 .92 160 139 138 126.7 18.6 ~5.0 .64 161 138 0 286.2 34.5 5.0 1.13 40.00 162 21 140 27.2 22.5 5.0 .20-163 140.141 6.5 12.6 5.0

34 164 141 142 4.3-12.6 5.0

.12 165 142 143 4.3 8.0 .2 .32 166 143 144 1.0 8.0 .2 '. 00 ELINE 166 PUKP DATA (HEAD-FLOW): 775.0 .0-580.0 4000.0, 500.0 4725.0 i LINE 166 IS CLOSED I 167 144. 145 9.9 12.0 .2 3.76 168 145 146 16.7 12.0 .2 .93 169 140 153 16.0 22.5 5.0 .06 170 153 173 21.5 22.5 5.0' .30 171 153 154 6.5 12.6 5.0 .44 172 154 155 4.3 12.6 5.0 .12 173 155 156 4.3 8.0 .2 .32 ii 174 156-157 1.0 8.0 .2 . 00 LINE 174 PUMP DATA (HEAD-FLOW): 775.0 .0 580.0 4000.0 500.0. 4725.0 LINE 174 IS CLOSED 175 157 158 9.8 12.0 .2 3.76 176 158 146 31.4 12.0 .2 -1.07 .? 177 141 147 8 1.7 .2 .20 178 147 148 .5 1.7 .2 .07-i 179 148 149 17.2 1.4 .2 1.69 LINE 179-IS CLOSED 180 149 150 .7 1.7~ .2 26.27 181 150 151~ 2.2 1.4 2 2.12-182 151 152 19.9 1.4 .2 2.42 183 154' 159 .8

1. 7 -

5.0 .69 1 184 159 160 .5 1.7 .2 .07 1 185 160 161 17.2 14 .2 'I.69 LINE 185 IS CLOSED 186 161 162 1.0 1.7 .2 26.57 187 162 163 2.7 1.4 .2 3.70

f I l l l EER-91-0450 Att.77, Rev. O Page 5 of /L DATA FILE FOR "U2SCNRIO* 188 163 164 19.9 1.4 .2 2.21 189 193 164 21.2 3.0 .2 .32 190 164 152 16.7 3.0 .2 .54 191 152 165 117.8 3.0 .2 4.45 192 146 166 156.0 16.0 .2 1.15 193 166 167 18.7 16.0 .2 .44 194 167 168 10.5 15.3 .2 .14 195 168 169 2.5 15.3 .2 .00 196 169 170 1.0 19.3 .2 11.50 197 170 171 5.0 15.3 .2 .48 198 302 165 205.0 15.3 .2 482.00 199 165 172 7.5 19.3 .2 .00 200 172 31 31.0 18.6 5.0 .07 201 173 174 1.0 12.6 5.0 .00 1 202 174 175 4.7 13.3 .2 .10 203 175 176 4.3 13.3 .2 .12 204 176 177 4.2 8.0 .2 .32 j 1 205 177 178 1.0 8.0 .2 .00 LINE 205 PUMP DATA (HEAD-FLOW): 775.0 .0 580.0 4000.0 500.0 4725.0 LINE 205 IS CLOSED 1 206 178 179 9.8 12.0 .2 3.76 I 207 179 180 27.9 12.0 .2 .46 208 173 181 16.0 22.5 5.0 .12 209 181 182 .4 12.6 5.0 .00 210 182 183 4.8 13.3 .2 .00 i 211 183 184 4.4 13.3 .2 .12 t 212 184 185 4.2 8.0 .2 .32 213 185 186 1.0 8.0 .2 .00 LINE 213 PUMP DATA (HEAD FLOW): 775.0 .0 580.0 4000.0 500.0 4725.0 LINE 213 IS CLOSED 214 186 187 10.4 12.0 .2 3.76 215 187 180 17.4 12.0 .2 .29 216 175 188 1.0 1.7 .2 .49 217 188 189 .3 1.4 .2 .07 218 189 190 16.9 1.4 .2 1.69 LINE 218 IS CLOSED 219 190 191 1.0 1.7 .2 26.85 220 191 192 2.3 1.4 .2 2.80 221 192 193 19.5 1.4 .2 2.44 222 183 194 .4 1.7 .2 .49 223 194 195 .7 1.4 .2- .07 224 195 196 16.4 1.4 .2 1.69 LINE 224 IS CLOSED 225 196 197 1.0 1.7 .2 26.55 226 197 198 2.9 1.4 .2 2.41 227 198 193 39.2 1.4 .2 5.21 228 180 199 212.5 15.3 .2 1.33 229 199 200 2.5 15.3 .2 .25 230 200 201 2.5 19.3 .2 .00 231 201 202 1.0 19.3 .2 11.50 232 202 203 2.5 19.3 .2 .19 233 203 204 2.5 15.3 .2 .00 234 204 205 235.1 15.3 .2 1814.60 235 70 205 .7 .15.3 .2 .48 500 300 73 4.8 6.1 .2 .76

EER-91-0450 AttlF7, Rev. O. Page 6 of J2 - DATA FILE FOR "U2SCNRIO" 501 86 301 2.3 6.1 .2-191.23 502 171' 302 .4 15.3 .2 .00 503 46 303 5.8 6.1 .2 144.52 504 30 304 1.5 3.8 .2 .00 505' 305 31 32.9 6.1 .2 1.94 506- '18 306 103.8 28.5 5.0 .08-600 17 .0 1.0 18.6 5.0 4800.00 161.30 LINE 600 IS CLOSED 700 140 146 58.0 11.3 .2 6.24 LINE 700 IS CLOSED 701 153 146 58.0 11.3 .2 6.24 LINE -701 IS CLOSED 702 173 180 58.0 11.3 .2 6.24 LINE 702 IS CLOSED 703 181 180 58.0 11.3 .2 6.24 LINE 703 IS CLOSED-A SUCCESSFUL GEOMETRIC VERIFICATION HAS BEEN COMPLETED-JUNCTION NUMBER DEMAND ELEVATION CONNECTING PIPES 1 .00' 43.10 1 2 2 .00 42.40 2 .3 3 .00 -26.50 3 7 17 4 .00 43.10 4 5 5 .00 42.40 5 6 6 .00 26.50 6 7 8. 7 .00 26.50 8 <9 14 8 .00 26.50. 9 10-11 9 .00 29.20 11 12 10 .00 31'.80 12 '13 11- .00 24.60 14 15 12 .00 24.60 15 16 13 208.00 24.60 16 14 .00 26.50 17 '18 15 .00 26.50 18 19 16 .00 26.50 '19 20 17 .00 26.50 20 600 18 .00 36.30 10 25' 506-19 .00 81.50 21 22' 23 20 .00 81.50 23 24 l 21 .00 81.50 ~22 162 22 .00 19.10 25 26 65 12 3 .00 12.50 26 27 35: 24 .00 - 12.50 27 28 55 25 .00 33.80 28 29 26 .00 34.50 29 -30 l. l 27 .00-11.00 30 31 L 28 .00' '10.80 31 32 29 00-32.30 32 33 13 0 ' .00 23.20 33-54 504 31 .00 35.50 64 200 505 -32 .00 12.50 35 44 l '33 .00 12.50 36 44 45 l 34 .00 12.50 36 37' 40 1

b EER-91-0450 Att.77, Rev. O Page 7 of /2_ DATA FILE FOR 'U2SCNRIO" 35 .00 12.50 45 46 49 = 36 .00 17.50 37 38 37 .00 17.50 38 39 38 .00 17.50 40 41 39 .00 17.50 41 42 40 .00 14.20 39 42 43 41 . 00 17.40 46 47 42 .00 17.40 47 48 43 .00 17.40 49 50 l 44 .00 17.40 50 51 45 .00 14.20 43 48 52 46 .00 14.20 51 52 503 47 .00 10.80 53 54 60 48 .00 12.50 55 56 61 49 .00 8.30 56 57 50 .00 8.30 57 58 51 .00 10.80 58 59 63 52 .00 10.80 59 60 53 .00 8.30 61 62 54 .00 8.30 62 63 i 55 .00 81.50 24 66 t 56 .00 81.50 66 67 57 .00 79.00 67 68 69 58 .00 79.00 68 70 71 59 .00 74.80 69 72 i 60 .00 74.80 70 73 61 .00 74.80 71 74 62 .00 74.80 72 75 63 .00 74.80 73 76 't 64 .00 74.80 74 77 1 65 .00 77.20 75 76 78 i 66 .00 77.20 77 78 79 I 67 .00 16.80 84 i 68 .00 35.50 81 82 105 ^ 69 .00 65.80 80 81 70 .00 74.10 79 235 i 71 .00 .10 65 83 85 72 .00 .10 85 -86 106 1 73 .00 16.10 87~ 90 500 74 .00 17.50 87 88 75 .00 17.50 88 89 l 76 .00 17.50 91 92 77 .00 17.50 92 93 i 78 .00 14.20 89 93 94 79 .00 16.10 90 91 95 80 .00 16.10 95 96 '100 81 .00 17.40' 96 97 82 .00 17.60 97 98-B3 .00-17.40 100 101 84 .00 17.60 101 102 85 .00 14.20 94 98 99 86 .00 14.20 99 102 501 87 .00 20.90 103 104 114 88 .00 33.20 104 105 121 89 .00 14.20 107 108 115

l

l L EER-91-0450 l l Att.77. Rev. O Page 8 of 12,- _ DATA FILE FOR "U2SCNRIO" l 90 .00 31.60 108 109 91 .00 31.60 109 110 92 .00 12.10 110 111 117 93 .00 12.10 111 112 94 .00 23.00 .112 113 95 .00 21.00 113 114 96 .00 8.30 115 116 97 .00 8.30 116 117 98 .00 16.80 83 84 118 99 .00 34.50 118 119 100 .00 11.40 119 120 101 .00 28.50 120 121 102 .00 14.20 106 107 103 .00 34.50 13 140 141 'on .00 34.50 122 123 125 105 .00 34.50 123 124 131 106 .00 34.50 124 i 107 .00 43.80 125-126 108 .00 42.90 126 127 109 .00 44.40 127 128 110 .00 44.40 128 129 111 .00 44.50 129 130 112 .00 34.50 130 138 139 113 .00 43.80 1.51 132 114 .00 42.90 132 133 115 .00 44.40 133 134 i 116 .00 44.40 134 135 i 117 .00 44.30 135 136 i 118 .00 34.50 136 137 138 119 .00 34.50 137 120 .00 34.50 122 140 143 121 .00 34.50 141 142 149 122 .00 34.50 142 123 .00 47.30 143 144 l 124 .00 43.80 144 145 125 .00 44.40 145 146 i 126 .00 44.40 146 147 i 127 .00 43.80 147 148 128 .00 34.50 148 156 157 229 .00 43.80 149 150 130 .00 43.80 150 151 131 .00 44.40 151 152 132 .00 44.40 152 153 133 .00 43.80 -153 154 1 134 .00 34.50 154 155 156 135 .00 34.50 155 _l 136 .00 34.50 139 157 158 i 137 .00 19.30 82 159 138 .00 19.30 159 160 161 139 .00 19.30 64 160 140 .00 81.50 162 163 169 700 141 .00 75.00 163 164-177 142 .00 - 72.80 164 165 143 .00 72.80 165 166 144 .00 74.20 166 167 i .J

1 EER-91-0450 AttT7.7, F-v. O Page 9 of /2-DATA FILE FOR 'U2SCNRIO" i 145 .00 77.30 167 168 146 .00 81.20 168 176 192 700 701 147 .00 75.00 177 178 148 .00 75.00 178 179 t 149 .00 73.80 179 180 150 .00 73.90 180 181 151 .00 74.30 181 182 152 .00 63.50 182 190 191 t 153 .00 81.50 169 170 171 701 154 .00 75.00 171 172 183 155 .00 72.80 172 173 156 .00 72.80 173 174 157 .00 74.20 174 175 158 .00 77.50 175 176 159 .00 75.00 183 184 160 .00 75.00 184 185 161 .00 73.80 185 186 162 .00 73.90 186 187 163 .00 74.30 187 188 164 .00 63.50 188 189 190 165 .00 58.80 191 198 199 166 .00 46.80 192 193 167 .00 34.20 193 194 168 .00 34.20 194 195 169 .00 34.20 195 196 170 .00 34.20 196 197 171 .00 34.20 197 502 172 .00 51.00 199 200 173 .00 81.50 170 201 208. 702 174 .00 79.60 201 202 175 .00 75.00 202 203 216 176 .00 72.80 203 204 177 .00 72.80 204 205 178 .00 74.10 205 206 179 .00 77.50 206 207 180 .00 77.50-207 215 228 702 703 181 .00 81.50 208 209 703 182 .00 79.80 209 210 183 .00 75.00 210 211 222 184' .00 72.80 211 212 185 .00 72.80 212 213 186 .00 74.10 213 214 j 187 .00 77.50 214 215 ) 188 .00 75.00 216 217 189 .00 75.00 217 218 190 .00 73.40 218 219 i 191 .00' 73.40 219 220' -192 .00-74.30 220 221 193 .00 63.50 189 221 227 -194 .00 75.00 222 223 195 .00 75.00 223 224 i 196 .00 73.40 224 225 197 .00 73.40 225 226 198 .00 74.08 226 227 '199 .00 33.10 228 '229 i , -.)

i EER-91-0450 Att31, Rev. O Page 10 of /2 DATA FILE FOR 'U2SCNRIO* I 200 .00 33.10 229 230 201 .00 33.10 230 231 202 .00 33.10 231. 232 203 .00 33.10 232 233 204 .00 33.10 233 234 205 .00 71.90 80 234 235 i 300 .00 16.00 86 500 301 .00 14.20 103 501 302 .00 34.20 198 502 303 .00 12.50 53 503 304 .00 33.20 34 504 305 .00 33.20 34 505 306 .00 81.50 21 506 OUTPUT SELECTION: THE FOLLOWING RESULTS ARE OUTPUT RESULTS ARE OUTPUT FOR ALL PIPES WITH PUMPS RESULTS ARE OUTPUT FOR THE FOLLOWING PIPES : - CLOSED P1 PES ARE NOTED 5 2 16 31 34 38 41 47 50 57 62 79 88 92 97 101 105 109 116 120 RESULTS ARE OUTPUT FOR THE FOLLOWING PIPES : 128 134 146 152 168 176 182 188 198 501 503 32 58 63 110 117 121 218 224 234 RESULTS ARE OUTPUT FOR THE FOLLOWING PIPES : 59 111 235 197 233 RESULTS ARE OUIPUT FOR THE FOLLOWING JUNCTION NODES : 1 2 14 15 16.27 28 36 37 49 50 66 70 74 75 RESULTS ARE OUTPUT FOR THE FOLLOWING JUNCTION NODES : 90 91 100 101 109 110 143' 144 156 157 18 23 98 165 302 RESULTS ARE OUTPUT FOR THE FOLLOWING JUNCTION NODES : 204 205 THIS SYSTEM HAS 247 PIPES WITH 212 JUNCTIONS, 31 LOOPS AND 5 FGNS TERMINATION DUE EITHER TO THE DETECTION OF AN ERROR OR USER INSTRUCTIONS A

SUMMARY

OF CONDITIONS SPECIFIED FOR THE NEIT SIMULATION FOLLOWS THE FOLLOWING SPECIFIC DEMAND CHANCES ARE MADE : JUNCTION NUMBER DEMAND 13 124.00 l 204 4850.00 I 205 -4850.00 i LINE 31 IS OPEN LINE 57 IS OPEN LINE 62 IS OPEN LINE 72 IS OPEN LINE 73 IS OPEN LINE 74 IS OPEN LINE 88 IS OPEN

Att.7.]I, Rev. O EER-9,-0450 Page 11 of / L. DATA FILE POR "U2SCNRIO" LINE 92 IS OPEN LINE 97 IS OPEN LINE 101 IS OPEN LINE 109 IS OPEN LINE 116 IS OPEN LINE 120 IS OPEN LINE 128 IS OPEN LINE 134 IS OPEN LINE 205 IS OPEN LINE 213 IS OPEN LINE 218 IS OPEN LINE 224 IS OPEN LINE 234 IS CLOSED LINE 600 IS OPEN THE FOLLOWING CHANGES IN PIPE DATA ARE SPECIFIED FOR PIPE NUMBER 1 THE VALUE OF THE FIXED GRADE IS CHANGED TO 14.0 FOR PIPE hTMBER 4 THE VALUE OF THE FIXED GRADE IS CHANGED TO 14.0 F FOR PIPE EUMBER 600 THE VALUE OF THE FIXED GRADE IS CHANCED TO 26.5 PIPE NO. NODE NOS. LENGTH DIAMETER ROUGHNESS MINOR LOSS K FIXED GRADE 2 1 2 9.7 16.6 5.0 6.67 .00 5 4 5 9.7 16.6 5.0 6.67 .00 24 20 55 24.1 19.3 .2 210.38 .00 79 66 70 29.5 15,3 .2 18.38 .00 130 111 112 79.0 5.6 5.0 13.28 .00 t 136 117 118 100.4 5.6 5.0 13.61 .00 148 127 328 74.8 5.6 5.0 12.68' .00 154 133 134 75.7 5.6 5.0 13.28 .00 l l A

SUMMARY

OF CONDITIONS SPECIFIED FOR THE hTII SIMULATION FOLLOWS THE FOLLOWING SPECIFIC DEMAND CHANGES ARE MADE : JUNCTION NUMBER DEMAND 13 113.00 302 2635.00-165 -2635.00 204 .00 205 .00 LINE 4 IS CLOSED LINE 72 IS CLOSED LINE 73 IS CLOSED LINE 74 IS CLOSED LINE 166 IS OPEN LINE 174 IS OPEN LINE' 179 IS'OPEN LINE 185 IS OPEN

EER-91-0450 Att.77, Rev. 0 Page 12 of 12, r DATA FILE FOR "U2SCNRIO" l LINE 205 IS CLOSED LINE 213 IS CLOSED LINE 218 IS CLOSED LINE 224 IS CLOSED LINr. 198 IS CLOSED l LIER. 234 IS OPEN THE FOLLOWING CHANGES IN PIPE DATA ARE SPECIFIED PIPE NO. NODE NOS. LENGTH DIAMETER ROUGHNESS MINOR LOSS K FIIED GRADE 2 1 2 9.7 16.6 5.0 6.30 .00 5 4 5 9.7 16.6 5.0 6.30 .00 130 111 112 79.0 5.6 5.0 53.28 .00 136 117 118 100.4 5.6 5.0 53.61 .00 148 127 128 74.8 5.6 5.0 52.68 .00 154 133 134 75.7 5.6 5.0 53.28 .00 A

SUMMARY

OF CONDITIONS SPECIFIED FOR THE NEIT SIMULATION FOLLOWS THE FOLLOWING SPECIFIC DEMAND CHANGES ARE MADE : JUNCTION NUMBER DEMAND 13 113.00 302 2800.00 165 -2800.00 204 .00 205 .00 LINE 128 IS CLOSED LINE 134 IS CLOSED THE FOLLOWING CHANGES IN PIPE DATA ARE SPECIFIED FOL PIPE NUMBER 1 THE VALUE OF THE FIIED GRADE IS CHANCED TO '11.4 FGR PIPE NUMBER 4 THE VALUE OF THE FIXED GRADE IS CHANCED TO 11'.4 PIPE NO. NODE NOS. LENGTH DIAMETER ROUGHNESS MINOR LOSS K FIIED GRADE 2 1 2 9.7 16.6 5.0 6.48 .00 5 4 5 9.7 16.6 5.0 6.48 .00 130 111 112 79.0 5.6 5.0 3.28 .00 136 117 118 100.4 5.6 5.0 '3.61 .00 148 127 128 74.8 5.6 5.0 2.68 .00 154 133 134 75.7 5.6 5.0 3.28 .00

a:ni ov.uvwacht UOWTROL 312-2-51 ; 11:40 ;CP&L SRUNSWZCK PLANT

919 545 7854;# 2 4

ggg fjo. 90,~ D4S O 12ef t 9 ton O Aif.7.S R p I 4 2_ ATIACDENT 'l Pump Perfcruanca Log' i Purp Name 2a o Ct3 Unit ___2 PT Ro. 24 I-2 Rev. No. I Constants: Flow 5400 gp= Turbina/ Pump Speed we rya Rafarance Values Diff arential prassura _47 k psig Vibration 1 -(.7 til _ Low Actica Low Alert Accentable High Alerr High Action dp < 60 7 60 7_-< (,2 7 G2 7 12-f > 721 -E > 744 mils 0- M > E-5 01 > S ol ^ t Test Test Suct. Suet. Disch Diff Disp Vel Alrt Actu Resan Data Press Press Press Press Mils "/sae (V/P)(V/P) $ top Run Note 1 _B).!L/,11 5 4 ,,5;1 Q_,,,,,Q2,40 g y_ _ .. m N. ier j 0__ 3,f),l/$L d 9 ai 32 M _4 0 _o.24 L_ s Act be63 et t-134 7Mt n / 9 /u sr., 5L Et, _ 6N 0 23 P.., t.A# e. prt. utne. i si,,f,li,/31. jii K 5(. t,61 o45,,g3Q _ __ // / / /_)_,,__,,,,,,_,,_,,,. i / / // -- l l // -

Increase frequancy ar4 request evaluation'(if requirad).

a stNI.SY: DOCUMENT CONTROL . *12-~2-91 1 11:40' iCP&L BRUNSWICK PLANTA 919 546 7854;# 3 . i 4 .s g52.No.9104SD \\ ~2.afisio n O 1 i i 3 AftACHNIXT 2 A4. '7. T i \\ Pump Performance Los 7^5" Z I ' Pump Mene 3.xur. no Untt _ 2 17 No. 24.12 5ev. Me. _ Constantat Tlev _ .<zas e spa Turbine / Pump Speed Reference Values wu-rps J 1 Differential pressure _ f: 8. psig Vibration _ _ Low Action W Alert I

. c sil-Acceptable

=Minh Alert Minh Action 4P e Ja e em._-< g gm > g 3. m_ m.e-3 oils 0-g l y > h _ t. t . > _ f. 3' 1 \\ Tost Test Sect. Svet. Disch Diff Reasa Data Press Press Press Press Mils */ Disp Val Altt Acta Stop Run see (V/F)(V/F) ~ .5L.ltigl.tp sas y R _gssz.,,gg. m _ _ Este .A. .a.1.1.11. u. u. 43 a.2 ad A 14 non p

e. L/n.121. Lt..Es. u._ Ju 1.s,at _ _

.,a aos a A. L t.G l. L K. I M 4 G J L 2 M 24,1 31 a 3.% P7..,, sse .L,I/)'/.T.El1. 2:$,, & E _04 _ o.cer .D. $.I.',l 12.l. SL 1:9 11., inLT-Q$L,, Q,C. 'i A 11 /t+ / 91 51-si c L g,w a ge nt% g g _._ _//_______ l 1__. / I~ _ -l/,__ . 01ceresse frequency sad reque t s evaluation (if required). ~ SSEP/Vol. II/h'P-36.3 St-new. n: -l}}

ML20056D598

Contents

Text

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

6.0 REFERENCES

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

6.0 REFERENCES

REFERENCES:

References:

References:

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

ML20056D598

Text

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

6.0 REFERENCES

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

6.0 REFERENCES

REFERENCES:

References:

References:

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

Search