ML20056B665

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Concludes That Monticello Location Should Be Suitable for Nuclear Reactor of Type Described in ,If Appropriate Engineered Safeguards Provided
ML20056B665
Person / Time
Site: Monticello 
Issue date: 05/19/1966
From: Doan R
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
To: Dienhart A
NORTHERN STATES POWER CO.
Shared Package
ML20056B666 List:
References
NUDOCS 9102070690
Download: ML20056B665 (1)


Text

I i

Distribution:

t e m m enes e ssur o

esmuun W I 91966 Supplemental (416) V DRL Reading R&PRSB Reading C. Henderson E. G. Case i

J. Newell R. S. Boyd B. Grimes d lt b et 0. 5-3(,-(,(,

i Northern States Twer Company w/ACRS report 5/11/66 414 Micellet Avenue NSP ltr 3/1'//66 and

" Preliminary Informa I

h f 1/, )

Mimmeapolis, Minnesota $5401 vW tion for a Proposed Nuclear Power Diant" Attention:

Fr. A. V. Dienhart Manager of Engineering 6

Centimmen2 Northern States Pwer has recuested, by letter dated warch 17,1966, an informal review of the suitability, from a safety standpoint, of its Fonticello, Finnesota site for_ a single crcle, forced circulation, boiling water reactor desirned to operate at about ll.09 wt.

A visit to the Fonticello site was av:de by me::ibers of the staff on April 13,1966 Subsequently, a subcournittee cf the Advisory comnittee on Fesctor Safeguards considered the proposal on Pay 4,1966, and the application was considered by the full Cennittee on May 5,19% at its seventy-third meeting. A copy of the Committee's report is attached.

In the report the Coennittee concludes that the proposed site is i

acceptable for a reactor of the general type and power level proposed if adequate containment and associated engineering safeguards are provided.

l

'a~ou have indicated that field-fabrication of the reactor Frossure vessel is being considered at the site. i;o infor=ation has been sub-nitted on field-fabrication ned the et.ff b-- mt ennaf dared this topic in its evaluation of the rooticello site. In addition, a detailed evaluation of the geology and seismology of the site was not undertaken.

Based ou our evaluation of the information provided in your March 17, 1966 nubnittal, we have concluded that the Konicello location should be suitable for a nuclear reactor of the type described if arpropriate engineered safeguards are provided.

i Sincerely yours.

Original Signed D7 R.L. Don AIR MAIL R. L. Doan, Director p4 =4 = 4 = m f h an ar 13 cane f n e

, M [f-/__h^

D DRL DRL OFFICE p.

RS)%

s 7

Enclosures EGCase oan BG

js sunNAuE ERS_Ieport DAT E.-

_..5./18f66 5//[66._ 5/

66 y

5//p/66 Ibran AIL 8tS (Rev. S-r,3)

...,,,,,. man meias.mcr so--erna-s P

9102070690 660519 CF ADDCK 05000263 g; CF g

,