ML20055B568
| ML20055B568 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point  |
| Issue date: | 07/02/1982 |
| From: | Martin T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20055B567 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-247-82-10, NUDOCS 8207220505 | |
| Download: ML20055B568 (2) | |
Text
.
o Appendix A Notice of Violation Consolidated Edison Docket No.
50-247 Indian Point 2 License No. OPR-26 i
As a result of the inspection conducted on May 24 through 28, 1982, and in accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy (10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C), 47 FR 9987 (March 9,1982), the following violations were identified.
1 A.
10 CFR Part 50 Appendix B, Criterion VI states in part:
4
" Measures shall be established to control the issuance of documents...,
which prescribe all activities affecting quality.
These measures shall assure that documents, including changes, are reviewed for adequacy...."
1 Licensee's procedure OP-290-1 Section 5.2, " Development and Review of Discipline Design Criteria", dated February 11, 1981 states in part:
"The results of the review efforts shall be documented...."
Contrary to the above, as of May 28, 1982, the results of the review efforts for design modification packages MMC 80-2-04 and FFI 82-2-7 (an audit sample) were not documented.
This is a violation of severity level V (Supplement I)
B.
10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B states in part, " Measures shall be established for the identification and control of design interfaces and coordination among participating organizations...."
Contrary to the above, as of May 28, 1982, the design interfaces and coordination were inadequate in that the Engineering organization did not identify and transmit the response time verification requirement of NUREG 0737 for design modification number MMC-80-02-04 "High Range Containment Pressure Indication" to the pre cperational test writing group.
This is a Severity Level V Violation (Supplement I).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Consolidated Edison Company is hereby required to submit to this office within thirty days of the date of this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, including (1) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid rs 8207220505 820702 0FFICIAL RECORD COPY PDR ADOCK 05000247 G
.n,
,s.
~~.
)-
4 Appendix A 2
. =. -
further violations; and (3) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Under the authority of Section 182 of the' Atomic Energy Act-
' ' ' ' ^ ',
of 1954, as amended, this response shall be submitted under oath or.
affirmation. Where good cause is shown, consideration wiliabe given'to o
extending your response' time.
,4 Dated Original Signed 9F4 homas T. Martin, Director Division of-Engineering and N:
Technical Programs 1
~
es._
1 e
0FFICIAL RECORD COPY h m.
_.___w__
,. i,_,