ML20055B392
| ML20055B392 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05000142 |
| Issue date: | 06/17/1982 |
| From: | Eisenhut D Battelle Memorial Institute, PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATION, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20055B388 | List: |
| References | |
| CON-FIN-B-2505-2 20-82-477, NUDOCS 8207210665 | |
| Download: ML20055B392 (5) | |
Text
w . . - - - . . .
- +. ..
NRC FORu 173 u s. nucle AR rE GULATORY COMMISSION ORDE,R NUM!E Q 15-70) 20-82-477 DATE STANDARD ORDER FOR DOE WORK Jun a t 1, is re.
ISSUED BY: INRC Of fice) ACCOUNTING CITATION ISSUED TO: (DOE Of ficol APPROPRIATION SYMBOL Office of Nuclear Reactor _
Regulation, DL 31X0200.202 Richland Operations Office B&R NUMBER PERFORMING ORG ANIZATION AND LOCATION 20 19 40 41_1
,, EJN NUM BE R . ,
~*
Pacific Northwest Laboratory B2505-2
- Richland, Washington WOR K PE RiOD . THiS ORDEn FIN TITLE Consultant Services of 5. C. Hawley, R. L. Kathern FixtD CL ESTIMATED O and M. A. Robkin for Hearing Support - UCLA Non-Power FROu: TO:
Reactor Operating License Renewal Application 03/15/82 02/15/83
% OBLIGATION AVAILABILITY.PROVIDED BY: , , ,
.- S A. THIS ORDER 0 -
S AU N SWBOL" AND THE FIRST FOU.B DIGITS OF i J 4.991.000
""n,$"N5?$"CIS$UE"'e B
C. TOTAL ORDERS TO DATE (TOTAL A & B) $
S D AMOUNT INCLUDED IN "C" APPLICABLE TO THE " FIN NUMBE R" CITED IN THIS ORDER.
O FUNDS WILL NOT BE REPROGRAMMED BETWEEN FINS. LINE D CONSTITUTES A LIMITATION ON OBLIGATIONS AUTHORIZED.
[] FUNDS MAY BE REPROGRAMMED NOT TO EXCEED 210% OF FIN LEVEL UP TO S50K. LINE C CONSTITUTES A LIMITATION ON OBLIGATIONS AUTHORIZED.1/ SEE BELOW STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS PROVIDED DOE ARE CONSIDERED PART OF THIS ORDER ,
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
ATTACHMENTS:
THE FOLLOWING ATTACHMENTS ARE HEREBY SECURITY:
MADE A PART OF THIS ORDER: *
$ WORK oN THIS ORDER IS NOT CLASSIF!ED.
@ STATEMENT OF WORK (Modification) O' WORK ON THIS ORDER INVOLVES CLAS$lFIED INFORM ATION. NRC FORM 187 IS ATTACHED.
O. ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS O OTHER REMARKS (Reference the proposal by number and date and ondscate of the attached statement of work modoftes the DOE propossi):
This order extends the period of performance to February 15, 1983; modifies the PNL proposal dated April 12,.1982 as delineated in the attached; and requests that a revised proposal be submitted in 30 days. Please send a copy of the revised proposal to 3. L. Grenier, NRR.
After acceptance, please send to the NRC Office of Resource Management, ATTN: D. Dandois, and provide a copy to the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, ATTN: D. Corley.
ACCEPTING ORG ANIZATION
[ IsS4tNG Alff HORITY sio n a t uR e
..,, 4 R Darroll G Eitonhut. Di et-tnr Titu 71, m Division of Licensing, NRR
^"
limited to changes NRCFO on iY nsis.-7o with)iii1/Reprogramminkumberandthe the same B&R this office must be same Appropriation. Symbol.In orderwithin notified for this r so 5 days Formthat IN an to be effectivecanNN,llocati appropriate 6e issued and counter-signed to complete the action prior to receipt of any bills.
8207210665 820623 PDR ADOCK 05000142 O PDR .
TD 1578/ FIN B2505.
NRC 189/ page 3 of 4
- 1. Objective of Proposed Work The objective of the proposed work is for Pacific Northwest Laboratory to provide support to the U.S. NRC, Division of Licensing, for the relicensing of the non-power (Argonaut) reactor at UCLA.
- o. 2. Summary of Prior Efforts .. - - -
In a previous project INRC FIN No. B-2313) S. C. Hawley, R. L. Kathren and M. A. Robkin prepared the report NUREG/CR-2079, " Analysis of Credible Accidents for Argonaut Reactors." For the same project S. C. Hawley responded
[]
~ ~ ^
by sworn affidavits to two cont'eritlons tflat were a part of the summary disposition activities for the UCLA non-power reactor relicensing.
- 3. Work to be Performed and Expected Results Task 1 Responses to Interrogatories From the interrogatories directed to the authors of NUREG/CR-2079 by intervenors, the NRC has selected certain interrogatories for response .
S. C. Hawley, R. L. Kathren and M. A. Robkin will provide their responses to the selected interrogatories in sworn, notarized affidavits. The responses will be provided as long as the information requested is readily available, that is if the answers are already in NUREG/CR-2079 or in a cited reference or in a text or commonly found reference. Furthermore, answers will be provided only if it is not necessary to generate new data.
Task 2 Testimony aIHearings If required, S. C. Hawley will attend relicensing hearings for the UCLA non-power reactor to explain or interpret the research and results that pertain to NUREG/CR-2079. The work for this task was estimated to total 3 $
- , days and includes one tri[o probable hearin[lo ItNr " The scheduling of the trip 11 be determined when and if the testimony of S. C. Hawley is' dc.4wel required.
Task 3 Additional Responses and/or Testimony The work effort, costs and scheduling for written responses to additional v &n edd,4,.ael &.g interrogatories and/or written testimony will be determined as necessary should the requirements develop.
., a .
3: .. '
. . .~ ; - - -
- '(". ,
._- TD 1578/ FIN B2505 NRC 189/ pag] 4 of 4
~
- 4. Description of Any Follow-On Effort Not applicable
- 5. Relationship to Other Projects Not applicable -
.', 6. Reporting Schedule i.? The responses to interrogatories for Task l kill be notarized sworn affidavits and sent to the NRC project manager as soon as they are completed.
Routine monthly letter reprts will be sent for months in which any ,
s activities for Tasks 1, 2 or 3.are performed. -
<.~ -
~ ~
- 7. Subcontractor Information ,
A subcontract to Dr. M.'A. Robkin was established to secure his services for answering those interrogatories that were either explicitly addressed to him or directed to those portions of NUREG/CR-2079 which he authored. The subccntract was' established for a fixed price of $1',000.00.
i
- 8. New Capital Equipment Required Not applicable
- 9. Special Facilities Required Not applicable *
- 10. Conflict of Interest This proposed project has been reviewed by Battelle's Corporate Scope Coordina-tor, who indicates that it does not duplicate work being performed for others.
- 11. Summary of Technical Staff ,
- S. C. Hawley PNL $316.52'per diem R. L. Kathren PNL $566.56 per diem ,
-M.'A. Robkin
~~
U of W unavailable (see Item 7 - Subcontractor Information)
V eA v
k .
- 1 i
Enclosure 2 . . . .
I PROPOSAL CONTENT
. The minimum items required in all proposals are: ~ ~ .
'~ *
- 1. Performing organization's name and location.
.,, 3. Perfoming organization's, key personnel, program manager, or principal *
- investigator, their resumes ind FT5 phone number.
- 4. Background (definition of the problem inc1'uding the objective (s) to be attained).
- 5. Wo'rk to be perfomed (Provide a concise description of tasks to be perfomed and expected results for the period of performance. Note technical data requirements,) potential problems, and other technical y information needed to fully explain the effort. Highlight changes from F, prior authorized 50W's, if any, identify changes in performance, schedule',
l#
orcosts).
f 6. Identify major subcontracts, including consultants. )
- 7. Costs estimated to be incurred by DOE contractors, subcontractors,.and d consul tants. List by fiscal year to completion:
- a. Manyears of Technical Support (MTS)
- b. Costs:
(1) Direct Salaries (Labor) for MTS (2) Material and Services (excluding ADP)
(3) Total ADP Support (4) Subcontracts ,
(5) Capital Equipment t
.. ... ( 6 ) Direct Travel Expense (Foreign travel must be shown separately)
(7) General and Administrative Expense (Include indirect labor cost)
- c. Total Estimated Cost: ,
- 8. Forecasts:
I
- a. Milestone Chart for accomplishing the work.
23ni
, -~
f::a;,.
f 2
- b. Planned monthly rate of costs by fiscal year. This may be provided with the first report of an authorized program if not known at time of proposal submittal. At the beginning of each subsequent year, reports should include the planned monthly
, rate of costs for the ensuing year. ..
~~ .
- 9. Conflict of Interest:
In order to assist the Commission in its evaluation, the DOE Contracting Officer shall describe any significant contrac.tual and organizational T-- relationships of the DOE, its contractor, their emple'yees, or expected 4-- subcontractors or co'nsultants on this proposal, with industries regulated by the NRC (e.g. utilities, et' c.) and suppliers thereof (e.g. architect' '
engineers and reactor manufacturers, etc.) that might give rise to an apparent or actual conflict of interest.
Fi
- 10. Reporting Requirements (as on statement of work).
m a
- 3 y'A a
e
- J u-i __.___m_