ML20055B371
| ML20055B371 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Hatch  |
| Issue date: | 07/14/1982 |
| From: | Miller W NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM) |
| To: | Beckham J GEORGIA POWER CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8207210575 | |
| Download: ML20055B371 (2) | |
Text
l
,)UL 1 4 1982 Docket Nos. 50-321 and 50-366 Georgia Power Company ATPl: Mr. J. T. Beckham, Jr.
Vice President and Genercl Manager liurlear Geraratior, P. O. Box 4545 Atlanta, Georgia 30302 Gentlemen:
We have received copies of the following applications which your Company has filed with the Office of 14uclear Reactor Regulation (ONRR) for review in connection with the Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant:
1.
Application dated April 5,1982, that contains two requests each for Unit Nos.1 and 2 for which a Class IV fee ($12,300) was paid, and 2.
Application dated June ll,1982, that provides a Limiting Condition for Operation Technical Specification for a situation where secondary containment integrity for Unit No. I cannot be properly maintained.
Fees pursuant to 10 CFR 170.22 were not remitted because your Company determined that it was exempt under the provision of Footnote 2 to 10 CFR 170.22 since it was submitted in response to a USNRC letter dated April 8, 1982.
As a result of information provided by the ONRR staff based on a preliminary l
review of the above applications, the following fee determinations have been made:
1.
The April 5 application, which includes a previous Unit No.1 emergency request of February 8,1982, involves two safety issues for Unit No. I and two separate and unrelated safety issues for Unit No. 2.
Conse-quently, $8,000 are applicable to each unit for a total of $16,000 in lieu of the $12,300 that was paid. Therefore, an additional sum of
$3,700 is due for this application. The fee schedule of 10 CFR 170.22 is based on an application for a single facility with provi-sions in Class I for situations where that application also applies to a multi-unit station with essentially identical plants. Since the tido-/210575 820714 PDR ADOCK 05000321 P
-l d............
NRC FORM 318 (10 80) NRCM O240 QQ( QM M
e "
JUL 1 4 1982 Mr. J. T. Beckham, Jr. changes for each of the two facilities are different, the Class IV grouping of several changes of a Class III type incorporated in the proposed amendment does not apply. Also, the February 8,1982 emergency application was filed and approved (February 10) separately from the balance of the other thme changes requested in your April 5 application.
2.
The June 11 application is not exempt from fees under the provision of Footnote 2.
When applications such as this one are requested by the USNRC for the purpose of enhancing the safe operation of a nuclear facility or to correct a problem or potential problem relating to op-eration of a facility, they are not exempt under Footnote 2 unless specifically ordered pursuant to 10 CFR 2.204. Thus, fees are required for this application.
It has been determined that the review will in-i volve consideration of a single safety issue. Therefore, a Class III fee of $4,000 is due.
In conclusion, it is requested that a sum of $7,700 be remitted to this office to complete the fees required for the above two applications.
If the final review of these applications by the ONRR staff reveals that these fees are not correct, you will be notified and any necessary adjustments will be made.
Sincerely.
Original Signed by Wm. O. Maler William O. Miller, Chief License Fee Management Branch Office of Administration DISTRIBUTION:
PDR LPDR M. Fairtile, ORB-4 R. Ingram, ORB-4 Regulatory Docket File (Rm. 016 - Record cpy) v LFMB Reactor Files (2)
R. M. Dig s, LFMB LFMB R/F 2)
M,,,
MB: ppm [,
una> L7
.L[MB:,DM, LEMB:ADM 0h)ibf...g r...
...c 1pway...voMinef,...
~~~>
- * " > U.L.d.IB2...,., J..... /.62..... 7L.l. 182..... 7/.f./82...
Nac Foo qs ye' Nad" o2" OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
_ _