ML20055B036

Notice of Violation from Insp on 820412-14,21-23 & 29

ML20055B036
Person / Time
Site:	Midland
Issue date:	07/01/1982
From:	Norelius C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20055B035	List: IR 05000329/1982003 ML20055B034 ML20055B036
References
50-329-82-03, 50-329-82-3, 50-330-82-03, 50-330-82-3, NUDOCS 8207200286
Download: ML20055B036 (2)

Text

Appendix NOTICE OF VIOLATION.

Consumers Power Company Docket No. 50-329 Docket No. 50-330 -

As a result of the routine safety inspection conducted on April 12-14 and 21-23, 1982, and in accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy, 47 FR 9987 (March 9, 1982), the following violation was identified:

10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, states in part that, " Activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions...and shall be accomplished in accordance with these instructions... instructions, procedures, or drawings shall include appropriate quantitative or qualita-tive acceptance criteria for determining that important activities have been satisfactorily accomplished."

CPCo Quality Assurance Program Policy No. 5, states in part that, "organi-zations... prepare and maintain procedures as necessary to provide instruc-tions. . .for a consistent method of performing recurring engineering, con-etruction and Quality Assurance activities...these documents provide quali-tative and quantitative acceptance criteria for determining that important activities have been satisfactorily accomplished."

Contrary to the above, the inspector determined the following three examples of noncompliance:

a. CPCo's QA Procedure No. 6-1 requires that the number of attachment changes to a drawing be limited to four. Thereafter, any change results in its incorporation into the drawing. Bechtel Drawing C-1315 has nine outstanding FCR's and Drawing C-1316 has five out-

! standing FCR's,

b. Specification C-211 does not have the degree of controls necessary for the protection to be used during excavation. This resulted in the BWST #3 valve pit being undermined during the removal of an

electrical duct bank, t

c. CPCo's QA Procedure No. 3 requires that verification of design be i performed by individuals other than those who performed the original design. Mergentine's Field Procedures 52 and 55 were marked up in ink to show changes made. There was no evidence as to when or by whom the changes were made. This resulted in inadequate assurance i that the changes were reviewed and approved prior to implementation of the procedure.

This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement II).

l 8207200286 820702 gDRADOCK 05000329 PDR

Appendix 2 Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, you are required to submit to this office within thirty days of the date of this Notice a written state-ment or explanation in reply, including for each item of noncompliance:

(1) corrective action taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective action to be taken to avoid further noncompliance; and (3) the date when full com-pliance will be achieved. Consideration may be given to extending your response time for good cause shown.

& tv Dated'~

4/Jn td. L M w s gp' C. E. No'redius , Director p Division of Engineering and Technical Programs