ML20055A720

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards IE Insp Rept 50-320/82-04 on 820321-0424 & Notice of Violation
ML20055A720
Person / Time
Site: Crane Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 06/22/1982
From: Starostecki R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To: J. J. Barton
GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORP.
Shared Package
ML20055A721 List:
References
NUDOCS 8207190371
Download: ML20055A720 (4)


See also: IR 05000320/1982004

Text

_ __ _

_ _ _ _ . ..

..

..

.

.

.. . _ . ..

..

.

..

.

'

0

'

.,

O

2 ? 1982

Docket No. 50-320

GPU Nuclear Corporation

ATTN: Mr. J. J. Barton

Acting Director of TMI-2

P.0 Box 480

Middletown, Pennsylvania 17057

Gentlemen:

Subject:

Inspection 50-320/82-04

This refers to the routine safety inspection conducted by Mr. R. Conte of this

office on March 21 - April 24,1982 of activities authorized by NRC License DPR-

73 and to the discussions of our findings held by Mr. Conte with yourself and

other members of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection.

Areas examined during this inspection are described in the NRC Region I Inspection

Report which is enclosed with this letter. Within these areas, the inspection

consisted of selective examinations of procedures and representative records,

interviews with personnel, and observations by the inspector.

Based on the results of this inspection, it appears that certain of your activities

were not conducted in full compliance with NRC requirements, as set forth in the

Notice of Violation, enclosed herewith as Appendix A.

These violations have

been categorized into the levels described in the Federal-Register Notice (47 FR 9987) dated March 9, 1982.

You are required to respond to this letter and in

preparing your response, you should follow the instructions in Appendix A.

The responses directed by this letter and the accompanying Notice are not

subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as

required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.

Additionally,an apparent violation of NRC requirements is described in the

inspection report (paragraph ll.d) enclosed with this letter. We are considering

this item for appropriate enforcement action and will be addressing this matter

under separate correspondence at a later time. However, as a part of our review

l

of this matter., we want to discuss with you the circumstances surrounding this

l

and other related apparent violations. You will be contacted subsequently

regarding a mutually acceptable date and time for a management conference.

'

We are particularly concerned about the adequacy of your corrective action

system that allowed activities adverse to quality associated with the operation

of the Reactor Building (RB) Purge, Auxiliary Building (AB) and Fuel Handling

l

Building (FHB) Ventilation Systems to go apparently uncorrected.

,

I

0FFICIAL RECORD COPY

B207190371 820622

[g

DR ADOCK 05000

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

f

.

-

.

-

,

GPU Nuclear Corporation

2

g

g

In June of 1980, maintenance records associated with filter replacement identified

filter bypassing in the RB purge filter trains due to the filter cabinet under-

drain system. The corrective action to stop the bypassing was to use " tuck

tape" contrary to plant drawings and specifications.

In September of 1980,

inspection and testing of High Efficiency Particulate Absolute (HEPA) filters

following filter replacement for the AB Ventilation System were conducted in

accordance with maintenance procedures and using a checklist (apparently an

excerpt from ANSI N510-1975) to assure that there was no bypassing via the drain

system.

Documentation of as-found conditions was lacking, but it appears from

maintenance recori that a specific check for conformance to drawings and speciff-

cations was not performed. A similar replacement of FHB Ventilation filters

occurred in September 1981 based on a request for work in November 1980. Still,

the nonconformance was not identified.

As a result of an unusual Event on January 8, 1982, plant instruments indicated

degraded filter performance and/or bypassing of the AB and FHB Ventilation

System.

Investigation and corrective action apparently were not initiated until

after NRC site staff questioned your staff on this matter. Contrary to Technical

Specifications, a determination of reportability for the event was not made

until March 3, 1982, and subsequent to a meeting with NRC site personnel on

March 2, 1982. Additionally, at the conclusion of this inspection period,

records were not available for many of the HEPA filter inspections and tests

performed by one of your contractors for various filter replacements in 1979 to

1980.

Another example of delayed corrective actions associated with these ventilation

systems is noted.

In our letter dated October 6, 1981, which transmitted NRC

Region I Inspection Report No. 50-320/81-15, we brought to your attention four

apparent violations of Technical Specification Operability and Surveillance

Requirements related to these ventilation systems.

In your letter dated January 25,

1982 you acknowledged two of the four violations and committed to a response

date for the remaining two items by February 5, 1982. Since these violations do

not constitute an immediate threat to public health and safety and in the interest

of assuring effective corrective action, this office granted an additional

extension for the responses on April 28, 1982.

Timely corrective action to

address these issues has not been apparent.

The operability of the ventilation systems for the Reactor Building, Auxiliary

Building and Fuel Handling Building is an important aspect when considering the

contamination of components housed within those buildings, as a result of the

March 28, 1979, accident.

We consider the apparent degradation of these venti-

lation systems to be a serious matter and believe that the management and procedure

controls associated with this problem need to be examined.

In light of your

'

unique activity to safely decontaminate and defuel TMI-2, we have concluded

0FFICIAL RECORD COPY

.

.

.

,

GPU Nuclear Corporation

3

JUN 2 2 1992

that a management conference is necessary as soon as possible.

At the conference, you should be prepared to discuss the circumstances surrounding

these matters, your immediate corrective actions, your views on the significance

of the problem and your findings on the adequacy of the control systems that

allowed these to occur.

In addition, you should also be prepared to discuss the

existing controls in your corrective actions system and contemplated irrprovements

for major decontamination activities, including the upcoming reactor core evalua-

tion activitics.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790(a), a copy of this letter and the enclosures

will be placed in the NRC Public Docunent Room unless you notify this office, by

telephone, within 10 days of the date of this letter and submit written application

to withhold information contained therein within 20 days of the date of this

letter.

Such application must be consistent with the requirements of 2.790(b)(1).

The telephone notification of your intent to request withholding, or any request

for an extension of the 10 day period which you believe necessary, should be

made to the Supervisor, Files, Mail and Records, USNRC P.egion I, at (215) 337-5223.

Your cooperation with us in this matter'is appreciated.

Sincerely,

original Si8n'd 878

,

Richard W. Starostecki, Director

Division of Project and Resident

Programs

Enclosures:

1.

Appendix A, Notice of Violation

2.

NRC Region I Inspection Report 50-320/82-04

cc w/ encl:

L. King, Acting Director, Site Operations

J. E. Larson, Supervisor, TMI-2 Licensing

E. G. Wallace, PWR Licensing Manager

J. B. Liberman, Esquire

G. F. Trowbridge, Esquire

Public Document Room (PDR)

Local Public Document Room (LPDR)

Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC)

NRC Resident Inspector

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

Ms. Mary V. Southard, Co-Chairman, Citizens for a Safe Environment

,

(Without Report)

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

t

- -

. ,

l

.

-,

1

..

.

1

s

GPU Nuclear Corporation

4'

M2 2 E

,

.

bec w/ encl:

,"-

'

4

Region I Docket Room (w/ concurrence)

L. Barrett, Deputy Program Director, TMI Program Office

'

s

%

'

J. Goldberg, OELD:HQ

Chief, Operational Support Section'(wo/ enc 1)

.

Ms. Mary V. Southard, Co-Chairman, Citizens for a Safe Envir~onment

\\

,

_

s

-.

, - . .

.

, ,

..

~

%

.

S

,

%

\\=

s

A

A

'

s

.%

'

,

,

A

n

'

t

,

s ,

'

,

9

\\

,.

h.

'

~

%

g e

v

0FFICIAL RECORD COPY

' 's

~

,

-

.

.?

omce >

TMIS

TMIS

T

O

P0 a

1 DPRP#2/(

DP$Q

. Z.o v.....

.

..

...

  • * ^"'> . .RC

,/,lmp,

MSh baky,,

A asano, ,

LB, , , , t t, , , ,

RKeimi,g, ,

{Starostec)i,,

,,, ,,,,, ,,

,8//6/82

O/Af.82

,

,

5/..M/.82.. /.. ............

5/.7 /82

. . /. 7. . ./. 82 . . .

(

aan >

5../. 7./.82

5

.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

.. ................

.. . . ... ....

.

.

  • m i e - 2n24

NRC FORM JIU +10 80t NRCM C24o

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY