ML20055A456
| ML20055A456 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Wolf Creek  |
| Issue date: | 07/08/1982 |
| From: | Youngblood B Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Koester G KANSAS GAS & ELECTRIC CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8207190024 | |
| Download: ML20055A456 (3) | |
Text
_
^
DISTRIBUTION:
Document Control (STN 50-482)
NRC PDR JUL 8 1982 L PDR NSIC TERA Dock t lio.: STN 50-482 LB#1 Reading MRushbrook JHopkins Mr. Glenn L. Koester CPTan Vice President - fluclear PTKuo Kansas Gas and Electric Company FSchauer 201 florth Market Street Attorney, OELD r
Wichita, Kansas 67201 I&E ACRS (16)
Dear Mr. Koester:
Subject:
Request for Additional Infomation for the Review of the Wolf Creek Plant, Unit 1 Regarding Structural Engineering
Reference:
Letter from G. L. Koester (KG&E) to H. R. Denton (HRC), dated May 3, 1982.
As a result of our review of the referenced letter, we find that we need additional infomation to complete our evaluation. The specific infomation required is presented in the Enclosure.
To maintain our licensing review schedule for the Wolf Creek Plant, we will need responses to the enclosed request by July 23, 1982.
If you cannot meet this date, please infom us within seven days after receipt of this letter of the date you plan to submit your responses so that we may review our schedule for any necessary changes.
Please contact Mr. J. B. Hopkins, Wolf Creek Licensing Project Manager, if you desire any discussion or clarification of the enclosed request.
Sincerely, bf Rf nnl signed by:
B. J. Yo.:n;: blood B. J. Youngblood, Chief Licensing Branch flo. 1 Division of Licensing
Enclosure:
As stated cc:
See next page 8207190024 820708 PDR ADOCK 05000482 A
PDR m,
DL:LB#1, '/ DL:MB omee>
...l f.....
,l.....v/ )
. ~.
-..~.
.. ~....
JhopLinGy.t...dY.aun 1.aad sunn:m >
.... ~..... - ~
. ~......
..... ~..
.lLOL8.2..
..llh.l.82...
omey
...~~~ ~~
~ ~~
ac rosu m oo o3 %cu ma OFFICIAL RECORD COPY us= mi-mm
o Mr. Glenn L. Koester Vice President - Nuclear Kansas Gas and Electric Company 201 North Market Street Post Office Box 208 Wichita, Kansas 67201 cc:
Mr. Nicholas A. Petrick Ms. Wanda Christy Executive Director, SNUPPS 515 N. 1st Street 5 Choke Cherry Road Burlington, Kansas 66839 Rockville, Maryland 20850 Eric A. Eisen, Esq.
Birch, Horton, Bittner & Mbore Mr. Jay Silberg, Esquire.
f.
Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridg.e, 1140 Connecticut Avenue, N. W.
W5
' shingtorr, D. C. - 20036 A _ _ __
1800 M Street, N. W.
{--
WasTiing' ton, D. C.
-20036
' Kansans'for Sensible Energy D
Mr. Donald T. McPhee Post Office Box 3192 _
Vice President - Production Wichita,. Kansas 67201
=~
Kansas City Power and Light Company 1330 Baltimore Avenue C. Edward Peterson, Es,q.
Post Office Box 679 Legal Division Kansas City, Missouri 64141 Kansas Corporation Commission State Office. Building, Fourth Floor Ms. Mary Ellen Salava i TopTka, Kansas 66612 Route 1, Box 56 Burlington, Kansas 66839
.3
- *~ John M. Simpson, Esq.
A. Scott,Cauger, Esq.
Attorney for Intervenors Assistant General Counsel 4400 Johnson Drive, Suite 110 Public Service Comission Shawnee Mission, Kansas 66205 P. O. Box 360 Jefferson City, Missouri 65102 Mr. John T. Collins NRC Region IV Mr. Tom Vandel 611 Ryan Plaza Resident Inspector / Wolf Creek NPS Suite 1000 c/o U.S. N.R.C.
Arlington, Texas 76011 Post Office Box 31T Burlington, Kansas 66839.
Mr. Joe Mulholland Manager of Power Supply & Engineering Mr. Michael C. Keener Kansas Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.
State Corporation Commission Post Office Box 4877 State of Kansas Gage Center Station Fourth Floor, State Office Bldg..
Topeka, Kansas 66604 Topeka, Kansas 66612 Terri Sculley, Director Special Projects Division Kansas Corporation Commission State Office Building, Fourth Floor Topeka, Kansas 66612 H--
l i
l
REQUEST HR INRIOfATION ENCLOSURE WOLF CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCITf NO. SIN 50-482 220.9WC On Page 4 in last paragraph you stated that the method was selected in compliance with Standard Review Plan (SRP). Indicate which version of SRP you have referred to.
220.10WC The second sentence on top of pdge 5 implies that the original FLUSil Analysis is unconservative and unrealistic. Clarify. this statement.
220.11WC thder item C on Page 5, you stated that the presence of the soil surrounding the embedded portion of the structure was consedatively omitted. However in staff's opinion your omission of the soil may result in a frequency shift and may, therefore,. not be consedative.
~
Your response to this staff's concern is requested.
220.12WC In the results of analyses for both fixed base and using FLUSH, there is substantidl shift of maximum response. Itisr5 quested, that response spectra enveloping the results of two analyses should be used unless your justificEtion fer not doing so is provided.
OnPAge9inthesecondparEgr$phyouindicEtedtheconsiderationof 220.13WC torsional effects. Describe in detail how the torsional effects havebeenconsidered.inthean$1ysis.
4