ML20054L562

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
RO Correcting Reporting RO 82-20 Re Missed Surveillance Requirement on Personnel Hatch.Time at Which Surveillance Due Should Have Been 1100-h Instead of 1300-h
ML20054L562
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 06/16/1982
From: Ray H
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO.
To: Engelken R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
References
RO-82-20, NUDOCS 8207080245
Download: ML20054L562 (1)


Text

Gi:EIVED q.

Southern California Edison Company 1%? M; y 9, g g3 S AN ONCFRE NUCLE A R GENER A TING S T A TtON P.O. B o x 12 8 S A N C LEMEN TE. C A LIFORNI A 92672 Ll e H. B. R A Y vgtepwose svano~ uaNa " ' " " ' " " "

June 16, 1982 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Inspection and Enforcement Region V 1450 Maria Lane, Suite 210 Walnut Creek, California 94596-5368 Attention: Mr. R. H. Engelken, Regional Administrator

Dear Sir:

Subject:

Docket No. 5C-361 Correction to Prompt Notification Licensee Event Report No. 82-20 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Unit 2

Reference:

Letter, H.B. Ray (SCE) to R.H. Engelken (NRC),

dated J une 10, 1982.

On June 10, 1982, we transmitted the referenced letter to confirm our Prompt Notification to your of fice by telephone on June 9, 1982 of a reportable occurrence involving a missed serveillance requirement on the San Onofre Unit 2 Personnel Hatch. That letter contained a typograph-ical error in the second paragraph, 8th Iine. The time at which the surveillance was due should have been 1100 hours0.0127 days <br />0.306 hours <br />0.00182 weeks <br />4.1855e-4 months <br /> instead of 1300 hours0.015 days <br />0.361 hours <br />0.00215 weeks <br />4.9465e-4 months <br />.

We apologize for any inconvenience this error may have caused.

Sincerely,

/ Lv l

I cc: A. E. Chaffee (USNRC Resident inspector San Onofre Unit 2) g 8207080245 PDR ADOCK g%p gg fi N