ML20054K237

Notice of Violation from Insp on 820309-12

ML20054K237
Person / Time
Site:	Saint Lucie
Issue date:	04/06/1982
From:	NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20054K218	List: IR 05000335/1982001 L-82-189, Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Rept 50-335/82-01.Corrective Actions:Qc Inspectors Reinstructed in Requirement of Quality Instructions 10.5 & 10.23 ML20054K217 ML20054K233 ML20054K237
References
50-335-82-01, 50-335-82-1, NUDOCS 8207010323
Download: ML20054K237 (2)

Text

l APPENDIX A j NOTICE OF VIOLATION l Florida Power and Light Company Docket No. 50-335 St. Lucie 1 License No. DPR-67 As a result of the inspection conducted on March 9-12, 1982, and in accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy, 47 FR 9987 (March 9, 1982), the following violation was identified.

10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, as implemented by FP&L Topical Quality Assurance Report Number 5.0, requires that activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures or drawings and shall be accomplished in accordance with these instructions, procedures or drawings. Quality Control instructions were not being followed for inspec-tion of modifications to concrete masonry walls in the auxiliary building as described below.

1. Quality Control Instruction QI 10.23 requires expansion anchors to be inspected to verify that the expansion anchor pattern is as shown on the design drawings. Drawing numbers BCS 128-4.319 and BCS128-4.315 required clip angles for wall numbers 74 and 174 to be held in place by expansion anchors installed on a 2'-0" center to center spacing.

Contrary to this requirement, inspection of the installation of the expansion anchors in the clip angles for wall numbers 74 and 174 failed to detect that the expansion anchors were installed at a spacing greater than 2'0" center to center.

2. Quality Control Instruction QI 10.5 requires structural steel to be intpected to verify that the steel members are assembled and erected in accordance with the design drawings.

Contrary to this requirement, inspection of the clip angle installation for masonry wall numbers 81, 165, 200, 202, and 205 failed to disclose that the steel members (clip angles) were not assembled and erected in accordance with the details shown on the design drawings.

3. Quality Control Instruction QI 10.1 requires QC inspectors to perform a thorough inspection of completed work to verify that the work' i s completed in accordance with the design drawings and specifications.

Drawing number BCS 128-4.312 required that the gap between the wall and the reinforced concrete beam at the top of wall number 160 be grouted.

Contrary to this requirement, inspection of the modifications to wall 160 failed to defect that the required grouting had not been completed.

E207010323 820622 PDR ADOCK 05000335 0 PDR

4 i

Florida Power and Light Company 2 Docket No. 50-335

St. Lucie 1 License No. DPR-67

! 4. Quality Control Instruction QI 10.23 requires expansion anchors to be j inspected to verify that the proper size anchors are installed and to verify that the anchors are torque tested to the minimum torque valve specified in the design documents. Drawing number BCS 128-4.311 required clip angles on both sides of wall number 82 to be held in place by 3/4 inch diameter expansion anchors. Specification FLO-9110-AS-13 requires 3/4 inch expansion anchors to be tested to a torque of 200 foot pounds.

Contrary to this requirement, inspection of the installation of expan-l sion anchors failed to detect that 1/2 inch diameter expansion anchors were installed in the clip angle on one side of wall 82. The 3/4 inch i

expansion anchors in the other side of wall 82 were only tested to a t

torque of 75 foot pounds.

This is a Severity Level V Violation (Supplement I.E.).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, you are hereby required to submit to this office within thirty days of the date of this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, including: (1) admission or denial of the alleged viola-tions; (2) the reasons for the violations if admitted; (3). the corrective steps ,

which have been taken and the results achieved; (4) corrective steps which will 4

be taken to avoid further violations; and'(5) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Consideration may be given to extending your response time for good' cause shown.

Date: APR 0 6 1982 i

\

l I

r i

\

l

_.. . . . _ , _ _ . _ _ . . . _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ . - . . _ _ _ . _ _