ML20054K197

Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-324/81-26 & 50-325/81-26.Corrective Actions: Emergency Procedure PEP-2.1,initial Emergency Actions Revised to Identify Specific Instruments

ML20054K197
Person / Time
Site:	Brunswick
Issue date:	06/16/1982
From:	Furr B CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:	James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML20054K189	List: IR 05000324/1982026 ML20054K197
References
NUDOCS 8207010285
Download: ML20054K197 (2)

Text

m )

Carolina Power & Light C pf NN3N *

-, , A . c, s a' JUN 161982 32 JUN 21 A9: 28 Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Regional Administrator United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II ,

101 Marietta Street, N.W., Suite 3100 Atlanta, GA 30303 BRUNSWICK STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT, UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2 DOCKET NOS. 50-325 AND 50-324 LICENSE NOS. DPR-71 AND DPR-62 EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS APPRAISAL

Dear Mr. O'Reilly:

By our letter dated February 18, 1982, Carolina Power & Light Coupany (CP&L) responded to IE Inspection Report Nos. 50-324/81-26 and 50-325/81-26 concerning the Brunswick Steam Electric Plant (BSEP) emergency preparedness appraisal. In that letter, CP&L advised the NRC that we would provide a supplementary response addressing the deficiencies of the BSEP Emergency Response Plan which were noted in Appendix C of your January 11, 1982 letter. The enclosure to this letter provides that supplementary response.

If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact our staff.

Yours very truly, A

l B J. Furr Vice President l

Nuclear Operations l WRM/lr (n-66)

Enclosure I

cc: Mr. R. C. DeYoung (NRC)

)

B. J. Furr, having been first duly sworn, did depose and say that the information contained herein is true and correct to his own personal knowledge or based upon information and belief.

'~

! Notary (Seal)

My commission expires: win 6-8 84 1

l r ,.

8207010?.85 820622 me street . P. o. Box issi . Raleigh, N. C, 27602 PDR ADOCK 05000324 mung;;;Emen zw mma Q PDR

\

., ENCLOSURE 1 BRUNSWICK STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS APPRAISAL APPENDIX C EMERGENCY PLAN DEFICIENCIES Based on the results of the NRC's review of the Brunswick Steam Electric Plant Radiological Emergency Plan (Revision 2), the following deficiencies were identified: (References in parentheses are to criteria of NUREG-0654, Rev. 1).

1. (B-5) The minimum staffing requirements identified in Table B-1 of NUREG-0654 should be satisfied. The staffing identified in the Plan and clarified by your letter dated June 9, 1981, is deficient in augmented staffing and should be upgraded to provide for augmentation of on-shift staffing within the time limits and in those functional areas identified in Table B-1.

CP&L Response The staffing identified in the Brunswick Emergency Response Plan has been upgraded to provide for augmentation of on-shift staffing within the time limits and in those functional areas identified in Table B-1 of NUREG-0654. The Brunswick Emergency Response Plan revision was completed on May 10, 1982. Copies of the revision were sent to the NRC by a separate transmittal dated June 1, 1982.

2. (D.1, D.2) The emergency classification and emergency action level scheme set forth in the Plant Emergency Procedures should clearly identify the specific instruments, parameter values, and equipment status.

CP&L Response Brunswick Plant Emergency Procedure PEP-2.1, Initial Emergency Actions, has been revised to identify the specific instruments, parameter values, and equipment status. The revision of PEP-2.1 was completed on May 10, 1982. Copies of the revision were sent to the NRC by a separate transmittal dated June 1, 1982.

. _