ML20054J592
| ML20054J592 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png |
| Issue date: | 06/22/1982 |
| From: | Kelly M NEW YORK, STATE OF |
| To: | SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY |
| References | |
| ISSUANCES-OL, NUDOCS 8206290308 | |
| Download: ML20054J592 (100) | |
Text
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
- }
'c-
-a; BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD gg
- ..f..-
In the Matter of LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY Docket # 50-322 0.L.
(Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1)
)
RESPONSE OF STATE OF NEW YORK TO SUFFOLK COUNTY'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF
~
EMERGENCY PLANNING DOCUMENTS Pursuant to Suffolk County's request of May 11, 1982, the State of New York herein provides the following response:
1)
Documents attached 2)
Documents attached 3)
Documents attached 4)
See #3 5)
Documents attached 6)
Documents attached
~ ~ " '
Respectfully submitted,
~
MATTHEW J. KELLY Staff Counsel New York State Public Service Commission on behalf of State of New York Three Empire State Plaza Albany, New York 12223 (518) 474-8731 June 22, 1982
-s 8206290308 820622 j[
'V PDR ADOCK 05000322 O
PDR n
I i
1 1
e 9
O ITEM #1 Cer- -
8 e
e
(
.j T+ @
4 l^O.";.
?E?2f is on-spid meetin6s with all involved utilities (includeng LIIIU), the New Yort State Power Authroity, the hi, of licalth and tbs Disaster Preparedness M==4m.
To date, tbs -Tt has been accepted by all parties and tantative a,---
2 l
fear the utilities to fund the State pareieimtion has been zwached.
T.
'there is a great deal of interest and ocncerta with these safety plana and I would appreciate any suggestisms that you could provida.
Since: sly,
'l' '
VIILIEM C. LW chairican
. 4;.;
Disaster LA:s CW=4m cc:
M. J. Cuddy
.N E. H. L. Smith A. W. Gr+1ry
.T. Tyree File
- s-l,}..
e e
m 4
...f.**
J
~
e 4
9
/
U & WOLOGM HEALTH N!W yotx syAg p,..
F1LE:f'gppc6.Q&g;AL.
&d/6e#cy fi.us RETAIN UN7;L:
O DATE INDEFINITF.LY November 2, 1979 piscagg Mr. John R. a==arsall, Jr.
Vice President Long Island Lighting Company 175 East Old Country Road Hicksville, NY 11801 Dear Mr. Gunumersalla
- ?
' ^"* *
- Enclosed is a copy of the most recent revision of the Stata Department of Health's " Specific Operating Procedures (SOP) for the Shoreham Site" for your information and use. We are currently updating the New York State " Emergency Plan for Radiation Accidents" and will for-ward an interim copy as soon as possible.
Since emergency response planning is a dynamic process, the Bureau of Radiological Health will review the " Specific Operating Pro--
cedures for the Shoreham Site" for conformance with any. additional Federal guidance and updata as required prior en econnercial operation at Shoreham.
We expect to receive a controlled copy of the Shorehan Emergency Plan and Procedures for official use by the State. We presently have controlled copies of plans and procedures for all operational coussercial power reactors in this State for official use during exercises or potential emergencies.
We look forward to continued close cooperation with LILCO staff in development and review of emergency procedures including accident analysis and dose estimation procedures for Shoreham.
b--
Sincerely, Lawrence B. Czech Dnergency Plans and Special Projects Unit Bureau of Radiological Health Enclosure i
bec: Sherwood Davies Edward H. L. Smith Alan Nelson - LILCO q
N.
s e
F M
h O
e ITEM #2 p.
o e
e
s-
[S ATE OF NEW YORK g
EPARTMENT OF HEALTH 154 OFFICE OF PUBLIC. HEALTH TMER BUILDING 8 THE GOVERNOR NELSON A. ROCKEFELLER EMPIRE STATE PLAZ A G
ALB ANY. N.Y.12237 cc. van An tLaco, u.0.
LOCAL HEALTH MAN AGEMENT c m oneo-..,
wrLL Aur.Lgavy CL3:* g. n Au cMeg. W.o.
es, o,
., rows. u
,,a November 19, 1981 Mr. John C.
Gallagher Deputy County Executive Suffolk Coanty Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, NY 11787
Dear Mr. Gallagher:
On November 18, 1981, I had the~ opportunity to meet
.at length with members of your planning staff and representa-tives from LILCO to discuss the status of emergency preparedness for the Shoreham Nuclear Power Plant.
It is clear that plan development is progressing well.
Good cooperation is evident between your staff and LILCO.
More State staff time is being made available to assist with this
~
task.
However, it is also clear from our experience with other counties that the translation of plans into working realities requires a county-wide commitment which will only occur when the Chief Executive conveys an appropriate message to Department heads and other key staff.The need for full scale cooperation is heightened by a schedule which calls for a complete exercise of plant, county and State emergency capability in June.-
I would like to discuss this matter with you in the near future.
If you concur, please convene a meeting with representa-tion as you see fit.
Sincerely yours,
/ ch D nald B D vido.
irector Radiological Emergency Preparedness Group cc:
Dr. Lee E. Koppelman bec:
Mr. Muenkle Mr. Daverio REPG
- y C,..h.G.
W 42 -
- p. P>
W
~
y am. G-c'<Wy f-**s w
(
DISP 0SITION FORM l
I errico e = sob ** P8 '8 " * ' 8 " *.c s suesact Suffolk County Legislative Hearing On j
Emergency Plans Around the Shoreham MNDP Nuclear Power Plant
.. i 73 FRON OATE CMT 1 E. H. L. Smith 21 May 80 Mr. Crushky Dr. Matuszek and I appeared before the Health Committee of the Suffolk caunty Legislature to present testimony as indicated on the attached
.cg:nda.
Dr. Matuszek described the concept the Health Department has developed I
fcr an integrated computerized reporting system to be monitored at the State E.O.C. of the operations of all nuclear plants within New York State.
I very briefly described the statutory framework for disaster roepgnse as mandated and auth'orized by Article 2-B of the Executive Law.
In addition, Mr. Gordon Boyd, of Speaker Fink's staff, also appeared as a State representative to describe the provisions of Assembly Bill 11100 A.
There was some very limited disi:ussion as to some of the relatively minor differences between the concept presented by Dr. Matus:ek and the pro-visions of Bill 11100 A.
One point, however, that came across very strongly l
wts Dr. Matuszek's fear that the placement of a governmental representative l
in the control room of a nuclear power plant would be expensive and in-offective in large part because of the psychology of any person working co closely with representatives of the plant would,in time tend to reflect the plant operators' opinions, views and possibly their conclusions. As a matter of fact, the Chairman of the Committee picked up this theme from Dr. Matus:ek and expounded on it at some length.
While I did not stay for the afternoon portion of the hearing, I did hear 7
the FEMA presentation which was given by Mr. Thomas Maynard of Region II and the Department of Energy's description of the RAP and IRAP plans j
that was presented by Mr. Robert Friess who is stationed at the Brookhaven National Laboratory. Their portions were the normal agencies' reports of their organizations and capabilities.
1 d'dMv
/
c-cm
- EDWARD H. L. SMITH
('
Attachment Assistant Director g
l Disaster Preparedness Program j
e I l
CF:
Mr. Herskowit:
[Matus,:ek t-3 {}
MNf 2 71080 n.w. ar. 3 h
p.
D d i
wn;
- [w DISPOSITION FORM
~
OFPfC 5 svueob ost Ftka mapsmsNCE sytJECT h p.cy Plan for Shoreham lbclear Site leOP yo enou oATE cui i p
Michael J. Cuddy Bhard H. L. Sni@.
12 Mar 80 Qi V__.
J.
'!he subject plan has been developed by LIICO over the past 21/2 years through an approach that is unique as far as other New York State utilities
- .'f are ux- - 4.
Mr. Alan Nelson of the & fica of Engineering in LII4D has been the Project
~'
Manager wha devalmpal this plan in close emm1tation and coordination with lev al auth:trities, the New York State Bureau of Pad 461mgical Health and the
$34 State Office of Disaster Preparedness.
I, personally, have devoted cransider-P.'
able time and censultation with Mr. Nalm and other Iccal and State off4e4 =1=
in the review and revision of several drafts of the plan.
h
'Ihe uniqueness of this plan is that it is cmbining into one volume the emergency response plans and sme4fic ruxd. ires of the State as well as of the indivirb i Suffolk County departments and agencies, i.e. the res-panse procedures for the County Police, Public Works, health services depart-N6 ments, etc.
It is this office's belief that the Shoreham Plan, with its annexes and tppendices, has been developed in a manner which shauhi be followed in the j f.
develegnent of =4m41=" plans around other nuclear f=e414 ties. 'Ihe facility,
,^;
~
local goverrrnent offie4=1s and concerned State representatives all partici-l pated in the review and revision of drafts developed by the utility so that
'J the result has been a docunent that all concerned are f=miliar with and J
appear to be ecznfortable with. It is our intention to recrzamend to the consultants who will be developing plans for the other sites to utilize the Shoreham Plan as a model and guide.
'The copy of the plan which Dr. Chau gave to Ccxrmissimer Hennessy does not incitrie all the latest draft revisions of scme of the elements of the plan.
I do have a copy of the plan with these latest revisions that in.w. gate scme of the recent NEC regturements. You are welecme to refer to this at any tine. It sh3uld be borne intirri that the Shoreham Plan requires g
further revisicn and update in light of pihlic ation of NURm-0654 and whatever alternatives are finally adopted in the revision to 10 CFR Part 50, as well as the revised State concept of emergency res;cnse precedures. How-ever, these charx;es can be adapted into the existing famat.
x;:
c -,.-e J L en IDWARD H. L. SMI'IH Assistant Director Disaster Preparedness Prcgram 4.
MD'.ORANDUM OF UND13 STANDING y
h.-
~E T.'
BEWEEN h,c4 g,,g-NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
/E0NC ISLAND LIG1LTING CCHPAN5 fIM[
AHD _
{} ll0 w
Gr-Q, /'/F
.y EMERGENCY PLANNING In crder to provide for efficient and timely implementation of protective actions l shsuld they ever be required as a result of an accident at the Shoreham Nuclear l Pow:r Station, the New York State Department of Health (State Health and the
(,
Long Island Lighting Company (LILCO) have reached the following agreement and undsrstanding.
5.t A.
LILCO is responsible for notification and initiation of l
protective actions for persons within the LILCO owned Shoreham site including the " owner controlled ares", shorefront and jetties, the Wading River msrsh on the northeast portion of l
the site and the St. Joseph's Villa.
l I
B.
The State Health, in accordance with the "New York State j
', Emergency Plan for Major Radiation Accidents Involving Nuclear Facilities", is responsible for initiation of protective action to prevent or minimize radiation exposure of all members of the public in all other areas.
- ht':
C.
LILCO agrees to notify State Health through the State Natural Disaster Warning Point in Albany forthwith:
1.
Upon declaration by the LILCO Emergency Director of a Site UN Emergency or a General Emergency, i-j..
- f.;
2.
Upon declaration by the LILCO Emergency Director of a Plant Emergency where significant potential exists for the emergency to degrade to a Site or General Emergency, or 3.
Upon release of radioactive material in concentrations which, if averaged over a period of 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />, would exceed 5,000 times the limits specified for such materials in 10CFR20 Appendix B, Table II.
(It should be noted that releases of this magnitude would likely be classified as Site or General Emergencies).
D.
LILCO agrees to notify State Health in a timely fashion (as soon g.y as practical):
1.
Ep~on occurrence of uny incident involving radioactivity that would be of interest to the State to maintain public confidence
' and avoid public apprehent. ion.
2.
Upon occurrence of any incident, not necessarily involving re-leasen of radioactivity, that would be of interest to the State and/or the public.
8
?h*:;,h g
E.
LILCO vill install and maintain at its expansa a dsdientsd telephens line connected to the National Warning System (NAWAS). Two celephones-
.will be installed onsite, in the Emergency Control Center (control room) and in the Alternate Onsite Emergency Control Center (warehouse). '
The State terminus for the NAWAS line is located at its Natural Disaster Warning Point maintained by the Of fice of Disaster Preparedness in
- [.
Albany, New York.
,, ts
- .L -
F.
In the event of an emergency, LILCO in accordance with New York State
,'W.
/
M" Plans agrees to provide the following minimum information to the.
Natural Disaster Warning Point:
/J
- t_Y.
- I
- 1.
Location of site and time of incident,
')/ ;.--
- 1,..-
2.
Description of incident,
,a ef.55 3.
Status of plant, particularly safeguards, Fh';",,.r 4.
Meteorology conditions,
/
5.- Type and quantity of radioactivity released, W
'6.
Predictions of offsite radiation doses, and '
h 7.
Results of any radiological monitoring.
'$5^ '
G.
State Health and LILCO agree to coordinate their efforts in the release of information to the public to maintain public confidence and avoid public apprehension.
Each party agrees to restrict public; statements to
,1 ~
those categories for which each party is. responsible.
j.
ip t.
H.
LILCO agrees to conduct at least one drill annually in testing communi-y,,
cation channels in which appropriate State agencies will be invited to 21
}
participate.
For the New Jork State Department of Health
. / / '7fA-(k L-14 h
'Date
- h W-
~
Signsture
=
,wy
[
Title First Deputy Commissioner of Health For the Long Island Lighting Company t%@
f f
Signature
' bbthw%dl N 1 i 1b Mt*
tt.
u Titio Vice President -
e r
6
_s,+
I t
e e
ITEM #3 I
f.
h w
h 4
a i.-a'./
euuAuer aAoiotocicAtmAtm
- : p.g. g o:. 4-t -
NtW YCE STAM DIPT. CF MAtM *
. d
'I FILE UNDERA#ct oeP b#
t 5,eae~sy h".s bcc E.H.L. Smith F. Boorboor David Assirod, M.D.
c
~
March 28, 1979
- d
- o... c.~b
- E*%* ::. 4..., f *:5 v ', - 5 v
- 3,'.( H.?
KA 3 -
.?
.' %; 5"'
Deilly and Like '
200 West Main Street Babylon, NY 11702 Dear Mr. Hands
.ge The material you requested by phone on March 26, 1979 is enclosed.
The "New York Stata Emergency Plan for Radiation Accidents" revised September 1977 will be updated. Revisions are required in the section dealing with Protective Action Guides to reflect the State's adopting the US EPA PAGs for thyroid inh =1= tion and whole body gamma exposure to airborne radioactive materials.
In addition, it is anticipated that the State's accident categorisation will be revised. The draft " Specific Operating Procedures for the Shoreham Site" includes a proposed accident categorization.
(see Table 3)
Please note that the Shoreham SOP is a draft and has only recently been released for review and ce='una n t.
Sincerely, Lawrunce B. Czech Emergency Plans and Special Projects Unit Bureau of Radiological Health LBC:ds enclosure W
l' IW' '
),,
STATE OF Ntw YCRX X
EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT
/
EXECUTIVE CHAMDEk,
l 5'*h.k,'t,((]jlb STATE CAPITOL. '
g.,,$ % ',*. ll j
y
=,
sw a,m<
COPY l
U N E' I
I.
!B l
~
. February 8, 1979
Dear Mr. Ryan:
Governor Carey has asked me to thank you for advising us that the New York State Plan for Radiation Accidents has been approved by the U. S. I;ucicar Regulatory Corr.ission.
- U Ue arc delighted to learn the.the plan has bocn accepted
~
and that licw York Stato'?s efforts,in this arca have been recognized and lauded on{the Federal level.
We look forward to a continuing partnership with the Federal government in devcloping plans which will insure the protection of our citizens in the event of an accident involving nucicar matcrials.
Sincerely,
/s/ Robert J. Morgado
.Iir. Robert G. Ryan' Director Office of State Programs U. S. I!uclear P.cgulatory Commission Washington, D.
C.
20555
~
'/ Dr. David Axelrod, State Department of IIcalth cc:
l 1
8
/ /E,'f a 3
/
A b*i 0 610 Q h
,(
\\
~
)
N,s. g. e.g. c Q
NEW YORK STATE DEPART.'fE'lT OF 11EALTII
~
BUREAU CF RADIOLOGICAL llEALTH SPECIFIC 0?ERATING PROCEDUT,ES FOR TiiE 48 8
+e w.
. =..
9 8
h m
9 S
S 9
e 6
e
%e
( **. %.
'.s TABLE OF CONTENTS
.1.
INTRODUCTION 2.
DEFINITIONS 3.
PROTECTIVE ACTION CUIDES 4.
DIERCENCY CONDITIONS 5.
INITIAL NOTIFICATION 6.
RESPONSE ACTIONS S
e ae
- w e
e e
e
+
- =
e e
gpa h
e 9
e el 4
g e
't Q
LIST OF ATTACHME!!TS '
ATTAC11 1ENT TITLE 1
Shoreham Ducrgency Conditions and State
,{'J ' [
Q Response Action Levels 1h
~
7 3#
New York State Response Alcrting Procedures For Noclear, Incidents
^ g.] y a d, L< J -Ew h
,3
- 4. Ih New York State Response'for Nuc1 car f, (\\\\d - A Incidents W
[.. $*(* C# *~f(AMAccidents - Conservative Analysis A
Potential Doses Due to Desi'gn Basis 7
g 7,6 w.97>
.5 Potential Doses.Due to Design Basis Accidents - Realistic Analysis g
LOCA Whole Body Isodose Curves
/
7 LOCA Thyroid Isodose Curves 8
Plume Half-Width Stability A-G s t 9
Assumptions Used for Calculating
[P
~
Radiological Consequences of a Loss of Coolant Accident 10 Cumulative Thyroid Dose vs. Time After LOCA at Various Distances l
~
Cumulative Whole Body Dose vs. Time 11 P~
After LOCA at Various Distances 12 Assu*nptions Used for Calculating i
Radiological Consequences of a Loss of Coolant Accident 13 Evacuation Arca by Zones and' Zone Designations 14 General Location Map
?
c.b I
15 Road Capacities 16 Localities Within Ten Miles of the Site g
SS 4
e
LIST OF ATTAC!!ME!iT!i ATTACllMENT TITLE 17 Ilospitals in Suffolk County Within a Ten Mile Radius of the Site 18 Adult Resident Homes Within a Ten Mile Radius of the Site 19 Nursing Homes Within a Ten Mile Radius of the Site 20 Educational Facilities Within a Ten Mile Radius of the Site 21 Educational Facilities Within a Ten M'ile Radius (Location Map) 22 Educational Facilities Within a Ten Mile Radius of the Site (17urscry Schools) 23 Recreational Facilities Within a Ten Mile Radius of the Site 24 Recreational Facilities Within a Ten Mile Radius (Location Map) 25 Industrial and Manufacturing Firms Within a Ten Milo Radius of the Site 26 Criminal Detention Centers 0
l
( '
27 Location and Number of Dairy Animals g_
' ~ ~ ~
Within a Twenty Mile Radius of the Siteg m
m q p, w s 64==
g.3,s. m e v g
1 C avS. wh n C'A s
e m
a
i NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH BUREAU OF RADIOLOGICAL HEALTH SPECIFIC OPERATING PROCEDURES FOR THE SHOREllAM SITE
'1.
INTRODUCTION The Shorcham Nuclear Power Station is owned and operated by Long Island The nuclear power plant is a boiling water reactor Lighting Company.
rated for operation at 2436 thermal acy;c. watts, HW(t), and a net electrical output of 820 megawatts, MW(e).
The Shorehcm site is located on the north shore of Long Island in the town of Brockhaven, Suffolk County, approximately 50 miles from the western end cf Long Island and approximately 6 miles north of the Brookhaven National Laboratory.
The site comprises 499 acres with approximately 80 acres developed for the ctation buildings.
The Specific Operating Procedure (SOP) for the Shorchap Site is un appendix to the "New York State Emergenc'y Plan ~for Radiation Accidents".
These documents provide basic guidance to State Bureau of Radiological Health and State Disaster Preparedness officials for developinS protective
- actions to prevent or minimize hazards to life, health and property from Attachment ___shows the potential emergencies at the Shoreham facility.
New York State Response - Table of Organization.
2 The calculated offsite radiation doses in the attached tables and figures This are provided by the Long Island Lighting Company.
(Attachments
-)
information is extracted from Safety Analysis Reports and other required submissions as part of the L*.S. Muclear Regulatory Commission's licencing l
process.
i s
~
.-._m.
DEFI!!ITIONS technical resource personnel referred ALERT STAFF to in the "New York State EnscrGency Plan for Radiation Accidents", and other appropriate individuals.
Director of the Bureau of Radiological 3RJi Health, State Department of Health or his designee.
County Emergency Operating Center COUNTY EOC which is located in the basement of the Suffolk County Probation Building in Yaphank and from which local emer-gency actions will be directed and coordinated.
O 4
e O
g ge e b
a h
4
COUNTY EXECUTIVE
- The Suffolk County Executive is responsibic for civil defense s
prcparedness and for coordinating l
county wide natural and man made disacter operations in Suffolk l
County.- County Executive Orders have catablished a disaster coor-dination agency known as the Depart-
- ment of Emergency Preparedness.
COUNTY 11EALTH C0!EISSIONER
- the County Cormissioner of IIcalth Services or his designee on the staff
~of the Suffolk County Departinent,of Ucalth Services.
COUNTY WARNING POINT
- a 24-hour communication center with multiple modes of communications in-ciuding NAWAS. During normal business hours the County Warning Point is manned by the Suffolk County Department of Emergency Preparedness in the County EOC.
During non-business hours, an alternate County Warning'Poinc is manned by the Suffolk County Department of Fire Safety in the Civil Defense and Fire
~
Training Center in Yaphank.
- Chief of Staff to the Governor (CSG) who provides staff support to the Disaster Preparedness Co:=ission.
DISASTER PREPAREDNESS C01DIISSION
- State body responsible for the coordinatien of State and Federal disaster response and the rendering of State disaster assistance to 1.ocalities.
- emergency core cooling system.
EMERGENCY PLANNING ZONE (EPZ) - Plume exposure pathway - about a 10 mile radius.
The princip'al - -
exposure sources from this path-way are (a) whole body external exposure to gamma radiation from the plume and from deposited material, and (b) inhalation ex-posure from the passing radiation plume.
Ingestion exposure pathway - about a 50 mile radius.
The principal exposure from this pathway uould be from ingestion of contaminated water or foods such as milk or fresh vegetables.
- field employecs of the State Dcpart;n:nts FIELD STAFF of Health, Environ.cental Conservation, Labor etc., who will provide support, such as monitorint,, thtring, a radiological emergency.
o FSAR
- LILCO's Final Safety Analycis Report for the Shorcham Nuclear Power Station.
l' NAWAS
- the National. Warning System is a dedicated land-line (telephone) system for rapid dissemination of warning information and-emergency-announcements.
NAWAS outlets are installed in the State and County Warning Points as wcIl as thu Department of Energy Area Office at the Brookhaven National Laboratory and the Shorcham facili
~
~
- nuclear facility. operator or his designee,
.(plant manager, emergency director, shift supervisor, senior reactor operator, etc.) -
NON-DUTY HOURS
- generally 4:45 p.m. to 8:30 a.m. on weekdays and all hcurs on weekends or holidays.
OFFICE OF DISASTER PREPARED:IESS
- unit of State Government which provides (ODP) staff cupport to the Disaster Prepared-ness Commicsion for the CSG.
PAG a Protective Action Guide (PAG) is the projected biologically effective dose from a particular radioisotopc(s) to individuals in the teneral population which warrants protective action following a contaminating event.
"~~
~
POLICE
-mayrefertocounty,tovr.andvill.he police, County Sheriff or State Police.
SAFEGUARDS
- the minimum engineered safety systens required to maintain core integricy.
- the Southern District OffAce of Disaster Prepareducss is responsible for disaster response activitics in a ninc county arca, including the counties of Dutchess, Nassau, Orange, Potnam, Rockland, Suffolk, Sullivan, Ulster, Westchester and the city of New York.
STATEIIEALTHCom!1SS10:?!N
- State Commissioner of Health or his desiguce on the T.xcentive Staff of the State Department of I!cci th (Nput y Director f or Local llcalth !!ana;;e: sat, etc.).
~
STATE EOC ths Emergency Operations Center located in the substructure of the Public Security Building, State Office Building Campus, Albany, New York.
It is the point from which State escr;;cncy actions will be directed and coordinated.
The State Warning Point and the Office of Disaster rreparedness are located in the EOC.
STATE PIO the designated spokeman for the State Department of Health referred to in this plan as the Public Information Officer.
o c
the State Warning Point is a comuni-STATE WA!U!ING POINT cations center located at the State EOC in Albany.
The State Warning Point has multiple modes'of communication including NAWAS.
During normal business hours, the State Warning-Point is staffed by ODP.
During non-business hours, weekends and holidays, an alternate Warning Point is manned by State Polia.c, to maintain 24-hour coverage.
Q e
g, h
8 D
0 4
3.
PROTECTIVE ACTION CUIDES Protective Action Guides are the numerical projected doses which act as trigger points to initiate protective action.
PAG's are provided for the following pathways of radiation exposure.
Exposure from airborne radioactive releases.
This type of exposure a.
could occur within a short period following an incident as a result of inhalation of radioactive materials or from external whcle body exposure (immersion).
b.
Exposure through the food chain.
This exposure could occur from ingestion of contaminated foods and water.
This exposure may commence af ter the passage of airborne radioactive materials and may continue for a long or short time depending on the radionuclides involved.
Protective actions may be directed by the State Health Commissioner for projected doses below established PAG's in order to prevent or minimize radiation exposure to the population in the event of a radiation accident.
3.1 PAG'S FOR AIREORNE RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL PAG.for Thyroid Dose Due to inhalation from a Passing Plume a.
General Population 5-25 rem
- Emergency Workers 125 rem -
Lifesaving Activitics No specific upper limit
, Dose for E'posure to Airborne Radioactive b.
PAG for Whole Body Gmm.
x Materials.
General Population 1-5 rem
- When ranges are shown, the lowest value should be used if there are no major local constr$1nts in providing protection at that icvel, especially to sensitive populations.
Local constraints usy make lower values impractical to use, but in no case should higher value be exceeded in determining the need for protective actions.
(Office of Radiation Programs, United States Environmental Protection Agency) h S
l b
3.2 PAGs FOR THE INGPSTION PATHWAY The Food and Drug Administration (FDA), U. S. Department of IIcalth, Education and Welf are has developed guidance on accidental radioactive contaminjtion of humans via the food chain and animal feeds ({f. R. Vol. 43, 12/15/79, No. 242).
a.
Response level for Emergency PAG.
The response levels equivalent to the Emergency PAG are presented for both infants and adults, to permit use of either level and thus assure a ficxible approach to taking action in cases where exposure of the most critical portion of the popula-tion (infants and pregnant women) can be prevented:
ni..
ut.,
ee.,
- s u.n.se: m. u w e ar a s. u tz re w. u,,n %..
14.e.
r meter,o.iuo. imiuseuri.a -.;
4co
-. iniu.
- st.-
. es :.t. :s sa.
.x,0
.u,-.is-
-n,
..s.
r<an.arn:r
.Y..
Pasture caterecurtesituo<
sreras
- 3.1 31.
35 69
'T SO
. 130.
8.002 Mun (microcunes/ uter 6
- 8.12
- LT 3.4
- 22 0.08 0.S$
1J
'. GO '
- - ~ Tot.al intAte tuncrocutacsi '-
DJ 10 10
.110 3
12 25 LOS2 * *
- 'Nesborn lefant crittaat set::nent et populauen for Godtn 141.
-!Mant" refers to thi 41 cts than 1 rear of age.
'7 tors f altout. W@ne 138 as the eruy rsdro*ocine cf sitnificaru:e sith respect to en!!k cor.:tmination br3oud the fWt dar. In case of a remeter eccident the cureutauve estake of lecine 133 na cult is acout OJ
.a percent of lodine.131 assuming etunalent sepossuon.
- I'reste set:ht.
- Reste.r.st levets for the salutt possituen for cesfuro 137 rtier to the reest patheST3.
'PC3% SCtiv,ty la tr.stt. Whidrocurse per kilostant
=
L e- +
s
~ m S
e e
4.
EMCRGENCY CCNDITIONS r
4.1 CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM Emergency conditions are classified into f which cover the entire spectrum of probable our categories accidents.
ni=ing, characterizing and declaring each emer classification.
recog-Suffolk County agencies to ensure that thiPlanning is coo ency The system provides for notification ofsystem is co bency response organizations and for implem ose agencies.
appropriate emer-immediately applicable to a specific conditientation of actions corresponding response in the event of a ch on.
Provisions evel and the of the emergency condition.
e in severity This section describes the scope and identifi comprise each of the four emergency classificati es events which nition and action level criteria'are ons.
Recog-Control Room instrumentation.which is feasible, on read based, to the extent in response to conditions involving plant opImmediate action on such as eration (LCO), are detailed in the Shorcham
_Implementinq_ Procedures.
ns for Op-JL summc.ra gency h [_.
-,._m.
4 u h & -_ $ N,n, Eb Nda b I.
s. _ __ ti6.:
^ M D *'
4.2 N_OTIFICATION OF AN UMUSUAL EVENT a.
off-normal plant conditions whichEvents within this y characterize constitute significant emergency c,onditionsby themselves, do not these events could, however, indicate a Some of dation in the level of plant safety and/opotential degra--
to a more severe condition if appropriater could escalate taken.
action is not The primary purpose for this classificati that the plant operating staff recognizes inition is to ensure conditions, takes appropriate action and comes to a ating
.. of readiness to raspond in the event that the condition becomes more significant.
state abnormal conditions at Shoreham.also requires that med of by off-stto authorities for events within thiNo response is necess aion.
- Thus, imnediately, these ne tifications need not be mades classifica-compatibic with the. work schedules of the appro nito individuals.
to Suffolk County, State of Mow York a d thThese timely no ate off-n e NRC.
b.
Examples of initiating conditions in Notification of
~
An Unusual Event include the following (this list is not all inclusive, additional examples are provided in the Shoreham Emergency Implementing Procedures) :
1.
Transportation of contaminated injured individual from site to off-site hospital, 2.
Natural phenomenon,being experienced or projected beyond usual levels (e.g., any earthquakes, 50-year flood or low water, any tornado near site, any hurricane),
3.
Fire lasting more than ten minutes, 4.
ECCS initiated, 5.
Radiological effluent technical specification limits exceeded, and 6.
Security threat or attempted entry or attempted sabotage.
4.3 ALERT This classification is characterized by events which a.
indicate an actual degradation of the level of plant safety.
It requires response by the plant' emergency organization, augmentation of on-site emergency re-sources, and constitutes the lowest level where emergency off-site response may be anticipated.
Prompt notification of events within the Alert classification will be made to Suffolk County, State of New York and the NRC.
s n. - -
Examples of initiating conditions in the Alert class
~ '
b.
may' include the following (this list is not all in-clusive, additional examples are provided in the Shorcham Emergency Implementing Procedures) :
l 1.
Severe loss of fuel cladding, 2.
Loss of off-site power and loss of all on-site AC power, 3.
Loss of functions needed for plant cold shutdown, 4.
High radiation levcis or high airborne contamina-tion which indicate a severe degradation in the control of radioactive materials, b
e
5.
Radiolog'ical effluents greator than 10 times 3
technical specification instantaneous limits, 6.
Ongoing security compromise, and 7.
Severe natural phenomena or hazards being ex-perienced or projected.
4.4 SITE EMERGENCY A Site Emergency is characterized by events involving a.
actual or probable major failures of plant functions needed for protection of the public.
Most events within this classification constitute actual or clear potential for significant releases of radioactive material to the environment.
Although emergency actions involving members of the public may not be necessary, off-site emergency response organizations should be mobilized and ready to implement protective measures.
Notification will be made within 15 minutes of the occurrence of a Site Emergency event to Suffolk.
~
County, State of New York and the NRC.
b.
Examples of initiating conditions in Site Emergency, may include the following (this list is not all inclusive, additicnal examples are provided in the 1
Shoreham Emergency Implementing Procedures):
1.
Known loss of coolant accident greater than make-up pump capacity, 2.
Loss of off-site power and loss of on-site: AC power for more then 15 minutes, 3.
BWR steam line break out. side containment without 0-isolation, 4.
Loss of all vital on-site DC power for more than 15 minutes.
5.
Fire affecting safety systems, 6.
Loss of functions needed for plant hot shutdown, and 7.
Severe natural phenomena or hazard being experienced or projected with plan not in cold shutdown.
e S
4.5 GENCRAL EMERGENCh a.
This emergency class is characterized by events that are occurring or havo occurred which involve actual or imminent substantial core degradation or melting with potential for loss of containment integrity with release of significant radioactivity to the environ-ment.
Total activation of the on-site and off-site emergency organizations are required.
Actions in-vclving off-site populations are highly probable.
Notification will be made.within 15 minutes to Suffolk County, State of New York and the NRC.
b.
Examples of initiating conditions in General Emergency may include the following (this list is not all inclusive, additional examples are provided in the Shoreham Emergency Implementing Procedures):
1.
a.
Effluent monitors detect levels corres-ponding to 1 rem /hr. W.B. or 5 rem /hr.
thyroid at the site boundary under actual meteorological conditions, b.
These dose rates are projected based on other plant parameters (e.g., radiation icvels in containment with leak rate appropriate for existing containment pressure with'some confirmation from effluent monitors) or are measured in the environs.
Note:
Consider evacuation only within about 2 miles of the site boundary unless these levels are exceeded by a factor of 10 or projected to continue for 10 hours1.157407e-4 days <br />0.00278 hours <br />1.653439e-5 weeks <br />3.805e-6 months <br />.
~ '
2.
Loss of 2 of 3 fission product barriers with a potential loss of 3rd barrier (e.g., loss of core geometry and primary coolant boundary and high potential fcr loss of containment).
Note:
Consider 2 mile precautionary evacua-tion.
If more than gap activity released, extend this to 5 miles downwind.
3.
Loss of physical control of the facility.
Note:
Ccnsider 2 mile precautionary evacuaticn.
9 4.
4.
Other plant conditions exist, from whatever source, that make release of large amounts of radioactivity in a short time period possible (e.g., any core melt situation).
For sequences where significant releases Notes:
a.
are not yet taking place and large amounts of fission products are not yet in the containment atmosphere, consider 2 mile precautionary evacuation.
Consider 5 mile downwind evaucation (45* to 90* sector) if large amounts of fission products are in the containment atmosphere.
Recommend sheltering in other parts of the plume exposure Emergency Plantiing Zone under this circumstance.
b.
For sequences where significant releases are not yet taking place and containment failure leading to a direct atmospheric release is likely in the sequence, but not imminent, and large amounts of fission products in addition to nobic gases are in the containment atmosphere, consider precautionary evacuation to 5 miles and
~10 miles downwind evacuation ~(45' to 90*
sector).
For sequences where large amounts of c.
fission products other than nobla gases are in the containment atmosphera and containment failure is judged imminent, reconnend shelter for those areas where evacuation cannot be ccmpleted before transport of activity to that location.
l.
t a
e 4
5 INITIAL NOTIFICATION A " Memorandum of Understanding" has been established between the New York State Department of Health and the Long Island Lighting Company, in order to provide for efficient and timely implementation of protective actions should they ever be required.
INCIDENTS WITH NO OFFSITE CONSEQUENCES 5.1 For incidents classified as Notification of An Unusal Event which require notification to the State, the Shoreham staff will inform the State Warning Point or the Bureau of Radio-logical Health directly by regular telephones.
INCIDENTS WITH POTENTIAL FOR OFFSITE CONSEQUENCES 5.2 Site Emergency or Following declaration of an Alert'es the initial a.
General Emergency, the NFO providThis transmission is received information via NAWAS.
simultaneously at the suffolk and Nassau County Warning Points and is immediately relayed to the State Warning Point by the Nassau County Warning Point, the primary The State Warning Point NAWAS outlet on that circuit.
Initial Notification will utilize Attachmant when receiving information from Shoreham, Fact Sheet, which will provide the following:
1.
Location and type of emergency, Caller's name and means of communications 2.
contact if different than the predesignated telephone number, c-Date/ Time of incident, 3.
4.
Wind speed and direction, and e
5.
Status of c'ngineered safeguards (working /not working).
l
. State hrning Point calls 2ureau of nadiological IIealth l
b.
and provides the above information.
State 3RH calls 570 to confirm the information in 5.2a The NFO provides as much of the additional in-c.
above.
The State Warnin; ? mint will formation as available. when receiving information fr:n utilize Attachment Shoreham, providing ne fol10 wing:
1.
Trp Of Iccid2n: (t: ntportati:n a eident, reacter C Clfent, fir 2 in*.* l'.*ing radi:C tive.titerial, liquid accidental criti-diz:hrrge, ' --' ' - " ' ; accidcnt,
- 11_ :y, : : hor' r D -
o 2.
Primary offect to off-site areas (release to the atmosphere, release to water, direct radiation),
Estimate of the quantity and type of radioactive 3.
material released or that may be released, Estimates of off-site two-hour whole body (immersion) 4.
and thyroid (inhalation) dose, 5.
Perimeter survey results, 6.
Pasquill wind stability category, 7.
Status of safeguards (status of core coolant systems, containment integrity, etc.),
Additional off-site agencies notified and 8.
nature of request and response, and 9.
Other pertinent information.
If there is any delay in receiving a confirmatory call d.
the NFO will notify the State Warning from State BRH, Point directly by telephone (518/457-2200 or alternate 518/457-6311).
State BRE assesses the magnitude of the emergency.
~
e.
State BRH requests the State Warning Point to immedi-f.
ately relay this assessment to the suffolk County Department of Emergency Preparedness and the Southern District ODP.
Suffolk If the accident conditions warrant, Note:
County will initiate actions listed in the Suffolk County response plan prior to formal approval by the State Commissioner of Health.
Suffolk County will be advised of any modification and/or re -
scission in protective actions that the State I
commissioner may direct.
Additional information on notification procedures is g.
provided in the "New York Staue Emergency Plan forin Radiation Accidents," as well as Attachment l
this SOP.
t
[
s
~~~
)
6.
RESPONSE ACTIONS Emergency response actions are base'd on anticipated off-site radiological consequences.
Notification of unusual event (s) does not involve the off-site release of radio-active material.
These incidents do not require the general public to take protective actions.
Alert, Site Emergency and General Emergency may involve off-site radiological releases and, therefore, the following protective actions should be considered.
Attachment shows the' relation between the incident condition at shoreham and the off-site response action level.
O e
b e
e h am l
3 w
l
o.
6.1 NOTIFICATION OF AN UNUSUAL EVENT This Response Action level is for incidents with no off-Summarized in Attachment site radiological consequences.
are actions to be initiated during such an event by the Licensee, State and/or Suffolk County.
/
State BRH informs the State Health Commissioner a.
of the facts, b.
State DRH continuously evaluates the event.
State BRH provides periodic advisories to State ODP, c.
Suffolk County Departments of Emergency Preparedness and Health Services, Southern Region (White Plaials)
State Health Office and Southern District ODP.
S e
D 8
w.-
h e
?
l i
4
6.2 ALERT This Response Action level is for the incidents with projected off-site radiological consequences less than the PAG for the general population.
Summarized in Attachment are actions to be initiated during such an event by the Licensee, State and/or Suffolk County.
State BRH informs the State Health Ccmmissioner a.
of the facts, b.
State BRH continues to evaluate the event.
State BRH, informs the Bureau for Radiation, State c.
Department of Environmental Conservation.
d.
Atmospheric (airborne) release.
1.
State BRH requests LILCO to furnish data on-the projected trail of the release and to perform downwind surveys to identify deposition, if any.
2.
State BRH advises State Health Commissioner on need for any protective actions for the ingestion pathway.
State Health Commissioner issues instructions to 3.
the public on appropriate actions, if required.
e.
Liquid release.
1.
State BRH requests the LILCO monitoring teams to collect samples and survey along the shore of Long Island Sound to the east and west of the site.
~_
State BRH determines need for any protective actions.
- ~
2.
State Health Commissioner issues instructions to 3.
the public'on appropriate actions to be taken.
f.
Consideration shall be given to implementing uhere
'and when desirable, the precautions of Site Emergency, State PIO should issue a coordinated announcement g.
with the Suffolk County PIO that reflects the size of the incident, the impact on the population and protective actions for specific areas, if any, to be taken.
State BRH provides periodic advisories to State ODP, h.
Suffolk County Departments of P.mcr9ency Preparedness and ifcalth Services, Southern Region (White Plains)
State licalth office and Southern District ODP.
.s
G.3 SITE EMERGENCY j cted This Response Action level is for incidents with pro e PAGs off-site radiological doses within the range of thef Summarized in Attachmentduring such an event by tEc~ Licens i
County.
ify State BRH instructs the State Warning Point to not i t ODP of the Suffolk County EOC and the Souther Distr c a.
the classification of Site Emergency.
f the State BRH informs the State Health Co b.
Site Emergency.
State BRH instructs the State EOC to contact the Alert Staff and Field Staff for support and c.
assistance.
State BRH proceeds to the State EOC, continues to maintains and updates dose d.
evaluate the event, estimates and meteorological conditions to be ex-pected at various locations, estimates the need for changing the alert level and, advises the StateHe Consideration should be given to implementing, whereth e.
and when desirable, Request Suffolk County to activate the population f.
early warning notification system.
State BRH requests that Suf folk County imp g.
County officials may modify these procedures - for
' ' ~
example, alter the location of the Traffic Co Points (TCP)
Restrict entry into the low population zone to authorized LILCO, Local, S, tate and Feder 1.
(see maps, Attachments ___
following locations:
and ___)
TCP41 - Rcuta 25A and North Country Ro TCPd3 - Long Pond Road & Wading River: Road-Manorville Road TCP44 - Route 25A & North Country Road
~
s
2.
Instruct the people in the affected area (downwind in the controlled access area and immediately surrounding area) to stay indoors, to stay off roads, and close all doors and windows, and to shut off air conditioning and forced air heating units.
These instructions should be given by all possible means, i.e.,
voice, loudspeaker equipment, radio, telephone, or any other practical methods of, informing each person and industry as expediently as possible.
Notify the Superintendent of Schools as appropriate, 3.
to be prepared to retain the school children residing in the blockaded area until it is safe to return them to their homes or until arrangements for thier pickcp by parents are completed.
If the incident occurs during non-school hours, the 4.
nearby schools may be closed until further notice.
Contact the Coast Guard to. request that they clear 5..
the waterfront at the Shoreham site of all boats.
Concurrently, with the above. instructions on taking h.
protective measures, the County and State PIOS may issue a coordinated announcement over radio and TV that informs the public that:
A radiation incident has occurred at.the Shoreham 1.
site.
2.
(Only if needed), the State Health Commissioner directs (recommends, orders, etc.) that the people living _
ti.ke the following precautions:
close doors and windows, remain indoors until further notice.
The State Health Commissioner's staff is in direct 3.
contact with the NFO.
The State IIcalth Comnissioner is directing the 4.
State's emergency response actions.
Emergency protective actions have already been
~
5.
taken including School children are being kept at school -(as ap-6.
and will be returned as e::peditiously propriate) as is consistent with their safety or until ar-rnngements for pickup by parents are completed.
4,
y__y-
-.---.--p
r
7.
Announcements on nosd for any further pro-tective actions will continue to be made on radio and RV.
State BRH determines the need for protective actions i
for the ingestion pathways from milking animals, drinking water sources, and from agricultural Protective actions recommend placing products.
grazing animals on stored feed, and/or quarantine of fresh food products within 50 miles of Shoreham notes the 10 and 50 mile radius.
Attachment State BRH provides periodic advisories to STATE ODP, j
Suffolk County Department.of Emergency Preparedness and Health Services, Southern Region (White Plains)
State Health Office and Southern District ODP.
~
State BRH request IRAP/ RAP assistance as appropriate.
k.
6 S
e G
ye, g
e my O
e 9
4
6.4 GCICR.TL EERGENCY This Response Action level is for accidents with projected off-site radiological consequences greater than the PAGs for inhalation and immersion.
Summari:cd in Attachment are actions to be initiated during such an event by the Licensee, State and/or Suffolk County.
State DRI! instructs State Warning Point to notify the a.
Suffolk County EOC and the Southern District ODP of the classification of General Emergency.
~
b.
State BRH informs the State Health Commissioner of the facts and recommends that the State Ccmmissioner confirm General Emergency.
c.
State BRH instructs the State EOC to contact the Alert Staff and Field Staff for support and assis-tance, if not already done.
d.
State BEH proceeds to the State EOC, continues to l
evaluate the ovent, maintains and updates done estimates and meteorological conditions to be expected at various locations, eutimates doses due to pathways other than immersion and inhalation, determines the need for changing the response action level and advises the State Health Commissioner in formulating.protectivo actions.
The State Office of Disaster Preparedness representing e.
the Disaster Preparedness Ccmmission will endeavor to provide all necessary assistance requested by State DRH on behalf of the State Health Commissioner.
f.
Request Suffolk County to activate the population carly warning notification system.
g.
State BRH requests that Suffolk County initially im-plement at least the procedures in their County Response Plan indicated in section 6.3g above (access control and sheltering).
- h. ' Disaster support systems including logistical, radiation monitoring and medical equipment should be asuombled at appropriato locations to aid in responding to the situa-tion and in implementing required protective actions.
o If the Stato'hcalth Commissioner determines that 1.
evacuation of selected areas is an effective pro-tcctive action based upon an evaluation of projected off-site doacs, anticipated duration of the release and meteorological conditions, Suffolk County will be advised to institute the following additional response actions listed in the Suffolk County Plan:
Based upon meteorological conditions, one or' 1.
more of the following areas established by Suffolk County should be evacuated starting from the Shoreham Station out to a distance of two (2)
If the situation warrants it, any one or more miles.
of the two (2) mile " Zones" could be extended to five (5) and ten (10) miles.
The roads. listed are Attachment the boundaries describing each zone.
notes the 2, 5 and 10 mile areas.
2 Miles
- Emergency Planning Zones Long Island Sound, (Zone A)
Bound on the north by,11e and North Country on the west by Woodvd Road on the south.
North Country Road on the north, Ridge (Zone B)
Whiskoy Road on the Read on the west, south and William Floyd Parkway on the east.
North Country Road on the north, William (Zone C)
Middle Country Floy'd Parkway on the west, Road en the south, and Wading River Manor Road on the east.
North Country Road on the north, Wading t-(Zone D)
River Manor Road on the west and Middle Country Road on the south.
(Zone E)
Parker Road (N.Y.S. Rt. 25A) on the.southe bound by Hulse Landing Road on the east, Long Island Sound on the north.
5 Miles
- Emergency Planning Zones Detailed in the Suffolk County Plan NOTE:
10 Miles
- Emergency Planning Zones cetailed in the Guffolk County Plan NOTE:
- The evacuated =ones may exceed the designated radii due to road boundaries and topography of area.
e
2.
If the accident occurs during school hours, children from the following schools should be hold at school, with individuals kept indoors, and windows and doors closed until evacuated or until arrangements are completed for re-uniting with parents:
Shoreham, Wading River School Districts, Little Flower Institute 3.
Open the designated facilities in the County Response Plan as recep, tion centers for evacuees as required.
4.
Contact the Coast Guard to request clearance of all boats from the waterfront at the Shoreham sito.
Concurrent public announcements, State and County PIOS, j.
should be issued immediately stating that a nuclear accident has occurred at the site, evacuation is directed for the following localities and protactive actions (shaltering, access control) are directed for the following areas State BRH determines need for protective actions for in-k.
gestion pathways from milking animals, drinking water
. Attachment sources, and from agricultural products.
provides ingestion pathway locations within and 50 mTles of Shoreham. Protective ~ actions recommend placing grazing animals on stored feed, and/or quarantine of fresh food pr.oducts within 50 miles of Shoreham.
notes the 10 and 50 mile radius.
Attachment State BEH provides periodic advisories to State CDP, 1.
Suffolk County Department of Emergency Preparedness and Health Services, Southern Region (White Plains)
State Health Office and Southern District ODP.
State 3RH request IRAP/ RAP assistance (if not al-m.
ready done).
State 3R5 and the Technical Resource Perconnel referred N.
to in the State Emergency Plan will continue to evaluate the situation and provide technical assistance to the State Health C =missioner in formulating specific inter =ediate and long-range protective actions, (thyroid blocking) will be distributed c.
Protective drugs as the situati:n warrnnts.
I
{
TION CONDITIONS SHORCHAM II!ITIATING HOTIFICAE ACTION LEVELS AND NRC/ STATE / COUNTY RESPONS Notification / Actions Projected Offsite l
Radiological Doses Shoreham
/ State / Local.
Initiatina Condition Timely notification NRCNone - Events blic in-terest but of no public None of an Natification
~
/ t te/ Local.
Unusual Event j
Prompt notification NRC S asurveillance an l
-C,1 Rem Whol'e Body',
5 Rcm Thyroid pasture, milk and other Increase control.
products
<C Alert of the s
Notification'within 15 minute l
occurrence NRC/ State /Loca. conside s
Rem Whole Body and thyroid 1-5 5-25 Rem Thyroid rkers, water piratory protection protection for emergency wocontrol, Site Emergency l rt.
f within 15 minutes of the
'f - i Notification l
occurrence NRC/ State /Loca.
i residents from'affected areas
.5 Rem Whole Body Institute protective
.i Evacuate Emergency as General Emergency
> 2S Rem Thyroid if appropriatesactions in Alert and Site nec9ssary.
e e
I l
l
]
lilITI AL !:CTIF] CATIOf! FACT Sli*dE DI3~~
1 Location and Class'of F.mergency A.
Location:
O.h$ d m s.bwsd be.d; B.
Type of Emergency:
P eenn;
- P a.. c.
- '. ZEx w " "
- m::;;Y
./~_~,7
-_...,.,~.a
....w.5.acy be.ek
/____/ asm au_c. x - m:
em
~
S* t
[ _] -Repp::se. Met:itoWEC+
m M Emergency
_ _.[ Ses.ph.60.]~.tm - General Emergency if different 5.
Callers name and means of ccmmunication contact, than predesignated telephone number.
_,_ Telephone Number Name 3
Date/ Time cf Incident Time Date
~~
4.
't.'ind Speed and Direction' Direction Wind Speed
~
~
5 status of engineered sareguards (working /not working)
Name of HF0 personnel confirmin6 the above information (ECC 6.
call back)
T$me
!!ame
%9
jrs-ADDITIOilAL TMFOR:'ATIO;l FACT _OllET.T fuel handling, steam (loss of coolant, Type of accident lity, other).
line becak, control rod drop, accidental critica 1
tmosphere,
-Primary effect to offsite areas (release to the a 2.
release to wacer, direct radiation).
l released or Estimate of quantity of radioactive materia 3
that may be released.
t site Estimate of whole body and two-hour thyroid dose a 4.
l ble.
boundary and low population zone, if avai a
'4 hole bcdy dose' at site boundary:
a.
. Thyroid dose at site boundary:
ti.
k' hole body dose, location and direction:
c.
-Thyroid doce, location and direction:
d.
eleh __
-demeum S. essesB61B esip-e e
g /y -
ADDITIOi!AL INFOlli4ATION FACT S!!EET (cont'd) i Perimeter survey results:
5
_ Pasquill wind stability category 6.
stability category:
a.
Wind Direction:
b.
containment Speed:
ig c.
Status of Safeguards (ECCS function n,
7 integrity, etc.)
d and nature of request Additional offsite agencies notifie 8.
and respence:
0--
~
l
-Other Pertinent Information:
~
l; 9
w-I, T-i f
I l
i i
l e
li
a, kWh c '1 *-
~
State and/or Local Cifsite Licensee Actions Authority Kcticas Class
. Notification of unusual event 1.
Promptly infom State and/or local 1.
Provide fire or security offsite authorities of nature of assistance if requested unusual condition as soon as discovered Class Description 2.
Standby untti verbal Unusual ever.ts are in process or have 2.
Au.yent on-shift resources closecut occurrcd which indicate a potential cegradation of tha level of safety 3.
Assess and respond
- o_r, of the plant.
4.
Close out with verbal sumary to 3.
Escalate to a more severe offsite authorities; followed by class Purnose uritten stmnary within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> Furpose of offsite notification is to (1) assura that the first step in any or, r
response later found to be necessary has been carried out, (2) provide 5.
Escalate to a more severe class current infortr.aticn on unusual events, and (3) provide a periodic unscheduled test of the offsite coraunication link.
Release Potential
~
No releases of radioactive material requiring offsita response or r.onitoring are. expected unless further degradation of safety systcms occurs.
Exoected Frequer.cy Once or twice per year per unit. -
O O
e l
v k
,,g. -
State and/or Local Offsite_
+
Authority Actions
-Provide fire or security Licensee Actions _
assistance if requested 1.
Promptly inform State and/or localauthorities of alert 2.
Class Augment resources by activating 1.
for alert as soon as discovered near-site ECC and any other A2crt Cic u Dascriotfor.
Aupreent rescerces by actlyating on-site primary response centers technical support center, on-site Alert to standby status key 2.
Events are in process or havecccurred which involve an actual operations center and near-sitemergency operations center emergency personnel including 4 3.
l monitoring teams and or po:cntial substantial c'egradation of the level Assess and respond of safety of the plant, Provide confirmatory offsite 3.
Dispatch on-site stonitoring teams andradia.tlon monitoring and 4.
~
4.
associated comunications ingestion pathway dose projections if actus) releases Purpece of offsite alert is Provide periodic plant status updatesto offsite authorities specification ilmits substantially exceed technical to (1) sssure that emergency 5.
parsennel are readily available to respand if situation 15 minutes)
Maintain alert status untti Provida periodic meteorological assess-verbal closecut becar.us more serious or to S.
mants to offsite authorities and, ifany releases are occ parform ccafirrutory radiation 6.
m:nt:oring if required, (2)
'or provide uffsite authoritias
~
curreni. stctus infor.r.ation, for-actual releases Escalate to a more severe classl I
],
Close out by verbal sunmry to offsiteauthorities followe ard (3) provida pussible 6.
unschedulcd tests of response 7.
center activation.
within 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> Relet.sc Peter.t al a.r, i
f Liraited releases of up to 10 Escalate to a more, severe class 1-131 equivalent or 8.
curies o curies of Xe-133 up to 10 equivalent.
_Er:ected Frequency.
P, Once in 10 to 100 years per l
unit.
- - - ~ _
' ~ - - - -
3 thorny %
Ob Provide any assistance Iicensee Actions 1.
and/or local off-requested of sita emergency status State
- 1. ' Promptly inform on as dis-I 1
authorities
, C_ lay and reason for eraergency as so pr i
p site S'ite Emergency site periodic updates Ausc ant resources by activating on-Augment resources by activating ite technical support center, on-s Class Cascription (E0C) near-site E0C and any other d near-3.
2.
emer5cncy operations center ansite cir.ergency opera primary response centers ersoinel Events arc in prccess or hava actual' occurred which involve c
f s[hkey or likely cajor failures o 4.
plant functions needad for Assess and respond itoring associated ccmunications protection of the public.
Dispatch on-site and offsite mon 3.
Alert to standby status other i tions teams and associated comun caemergency personnel (e.g., )
4.
l t 5.
those necded for evacuat a dedicated indlyidual for p an
/
of the site cmergency ities status updates to offsite author Provide warning is to (1) assure that (perhaps site duty stations Purpose
,5.
and pcriodic press briefingsauthorities) response centers are manned,(2) assure that monitoring teams joint with offsite 6.. Provide offsite rnonitoring assure that t
Make senior technical and managemen are dispatched, (3)for evacuation ltation and jointly assess them staff onsite available for consu personnai required with NRC and State on a perio Continuously assess inforr.ation at duty dic basis 6.
of haar-site areas are and offsite stations if sigction baccmes 7.
from licensee estimates monitoring with regard to serious, n) provida mateorological and dosetual changes to protective actions current infomation for and d
- s. ore to offsite authorities for ac already initiated for pub Provide l
ccr.sultation utth of fstte releases via a dedicated individua a
7.
authcrities and public, and(5) provide possible unschedula automated data transatssion d
Recomend placing milk animals capabilities and dose projections within 2 miles on stored fe or test of response i
8.
based on available plant condit onand foreseeable continge and assess need to extend Provide release in U. S.
8.
Celease Pctential information distance
- 9., Provide press briefings, pe of up to 1000 ci or out or recomend reduction in f offsite emergency class by briefing o followed with licensee Close 1-131 equivalcat or up to5 ci of Xo-133 equivalent.
Maintain site emergency status Releases 9.
authorities at E0C and by phoneby written suma f
until closcout or reduction o 10.
10 emergency class ExperjqdFrequency E
lass E
one hundred to once Escalate to general emerge in 5000 years per unit.
Escalate to general emergency c 11.
Once in 10.
r l
i i
.~
[ [ p A J.t A.'s-Q ',N g
4 Author 0Ry d
Provid2 any assistance requeste
% C 4 M.
9 Liceuen Actions I
local offsite Activate imediate publicof emergenc 1.
Promptly infor: State andargency status 2*
notificationand provide public periodi authorities of ger et soon as Ciass 1.
j as f
and reascn for ciaer_ discovered (Parallel notification o Recomend sheltering for 2 mile updates eral Emergency radius and 5 miles dowr. wind State / local) 3.
and assess need to extend
[s_s Description ite Augment resources by actlyating on-s s
cats are in process or have site technical support center, on-and near-)
distances actus1 2.
Augment resources by activating
.cerned which involva emergency operations centersite craergency operation (EOC i;x.;iaer.t substaatial core near-site EOC and any other 4.
or sciting with primary response centers sgradstionstential for loss of coatain-Assess and respond Dispatch key emergency perso including monitoring tea:ns and
{toring 5.
.cnt ir.tegrity.
3*
Dispatch on-site and offsite Mn associated comunications i tions teams and associ&ted coirnun ca
- ur ~ e 4.
~
Dispatch other emergency w
i h'in cneral emargency personnel to duty stations w t Provide a dedicated indlyidual for of the 6.
initiate pre-5 mile radius and alert all plant status updates to offsite Purpose varning is to (1 den.r;tir.ed protective actions 5.
authorities ared periodic press others to standby status for p blic. (2) provide briefings (perhaps joint with Proylde offsite monitoringand others continacus assessment of infer.:a-recm licensee and offsite offsite authorities) t staff 7.
results to licensee tion with and jointly assess these flake senior technical and managemen initiatedicated tion
, reasurer:ents, (3) n
, additional measures as inty event rcleases or potential s i rm onsite available for consultaa periodic basis, 8.
Ccnti u ya 6.
. toring with regard to cha releases, and (4) provide t'RC and State on i e Mc-orological and dose estWtu and d
current infor,mian forwith cffsite l
initiated for public and to offsite authorities for actuareleases l or P
s consultation mabilizing evacuation resource authorities and public.
Recomend placing mi autcmated data transmission Release Poteatial Provide release and dose projectjons 9.
Releases or recra than 1000 c).of and assess need to extend based on available plant conditioninforraation
- 10. Provide press briefings, pe nctes '
I I-131 equivalent er Ere than 8.
- distance ci of Xe-133 equivalent.
f Close out or.reconer.end reduction o l
105 f offsite with licensee Consider relocation to a emergency class by briefing o followed h n?cted Freonency 9.
authorities at EOC and by phoneby written sunn accumulation less than once in about 5000 Life threatening 11.
EOC if actual dosein n
)
years per unit. doses of fsite (within 10 miles bound of EPA PAGs Maintain general emergen about 100,000 years f
until closcout or reductio ence in 12.
per unit.
emergency class g
1:
w
g ra gi o
- g 6
M l
1
- I i
1 pp,
1 a
j
(,
I j.
[
l.,, i l'I @; i s. e.d./T '
I -
i
\\ te
.i t
, =.
i
>i t
g
- i=
i
} %x
,i, i
i i
i f.
'N y
=
1,, "y;.
\\/
l
'l I
y, [~
.g 0I 1; Y',~I' x
v
(
3 i
i 3
'l.
1 l3
\\
7
.\\
l I
- kl 9
yq o
s si M f
,i
[ I 71 1
n y
' D :)'
t 1
I l'il u,
s 1 l.
[
I '-
3 i:
- s. I I
(
T g
k i
j.
t
,ii hi
-i i
i i
3 4[-
i i
e
'9
[
t 1
j Y
- g.
!. ' g,b I
/
M I
y
[+.
d'
.t..
l t-Qs 9 n&h
)Y l
l
's
=n n.? m.
s 1
e i
ag b
jQy\\g + )<Q
.,a s
+
V tv c
~
e rE Ab i vi-svo s
t 9
yg yg~ [
t.
t t
t i-4
, STATE OF NEW YORK 1
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH i OFFICE OF PUBLIC HEALTH TrwER, SulLDIN G e THE GOVERNOR N ELSON A. ROCKEFELLER EMPIRE STATE PLAZA e
ALS ANY, N.Y.12237 EAviD ARELROO.W.D.
GLEMN L M AU CMit. M.D.
c-,.
4.
zw-=
April 28, 1982
-r Y
3 Mr. Charles Daverio Senior Licensing Engineer Long Island Lighting Company 175 East Cid Country Road Hicksville, NY 11801
Dear Mr. Daverio:
You ha've indicated t'o i2s 'that technical experts from the Brcokhaven National Laboratories have agreed to render assistance at youi emergency news center during exercises or in the event of an accident, as part of the public information
' aspects of the Radiolcejical Emergency Preparedness Plan for Shoreham.
Brookhaven assistance will be welcome.
The State portion of the Plan provides for their participation in dose assessment and monitoring upon request.
It is fortunate that Brookhaven's location makes it possible for staff to be available on short notice.
m...
For your information, we intend to provide the emergency news center with State technical staff.
The combination of Brookhaven and State expertise should prove to be of great value to those charged with advising the public.
I Sincerely
- ours, O
m nald Dav do f irector i
Radiological Emergency Preparedness Group cc:
Ms. Linda Milstrey i
bec:
Dr. Stasiuk Col. Shiro i
Mr. DeVito l
Mr. McQueen l
' Mr'.
Stoller
f g,h i
M be="#'
New York State Department of Health MEMORANDUM TO:
Done.1d Davidoff Director, REPG FROM:
Barbara Thomas Noble Director, PAG DATE:
March 31, 1982
SUBJECT:
"Impertial" Experts for Shoreham Drill Linda shared with me the list of technical advisors recommended by LILCO for the near site news center. For some reason I can't quite define, I'm still uncomfortable with using outside people to speak for the state.
It seems to me that the utility and the State should be able to pull from their own personnel to find someone reasonably articulate in the more technical aspects of plant operations and protective response. Using outsiders seems ts suggest that we question our own credibility. Also, as unpaid, independent persons, they aren't accountable to anyone and can say anything they like, editorializing included.
I would still opt for identifying a State technical person to assist the PIDs and answer technical questions at the news centers.
I know we don't have the personnel at present to fill this role, but expect we could handle it once we get some action on the 708 report.
=~-
On the other hand, I won't be here in June and don't want to lock you guys into my way of thinking. Perhaps we should discuss it will Bill Stasiuk and the Commissioner and see where they fall.
cc:
Ms.'Milstrey RECEIVE 3 APR3 1982 C0!0 LOG CAL E!2EE3E!!CY PREPAREDRESS GROUP
%+
e 9
e O
ITEM #3A 0
w.-
m O
e 4
f J
O 5
- /i NEW YORK STATE DISA.eTER PREPAREDNESS COMMISSION s
Public Security Building State Campus 1
Albany, N.Y. 12226 W
William C. Hennessy Chairman MG Vito J. Castell&no Secretariat Raymond 8. Harding Vice Chairman David Axelrod, M.D.
State Coordinating Officer June 8,1982 Matthew C. Cordaro, Ph.D.
Vice President Long Islan'd Lighting Company 175 East Old Country Road Hicksville, NY 11801
Dear Dr. Cordaro:
At my request, staff of the Disaster Preparedness Commission (DPC) have reviewed the Shoreham offsite radiological emergency preparedness plan which you submitted to the Commission on May 10, 1982. The review was conducted by evaluating the submitted material against applicable Federal regulations (NUREG-0654, FEMA REP-1) and the planning standards and evaluation criteria set forth therein. A similar cpproach was used in our review of the other seven plans for counties proximate to the three sites which contain operating nuclear power plants in New York.
Our evaluation measured the plan material against the 99 NURIG-0654 elements spplicable to local plans. Staff graded the submitted material as:
" adequate,"
"needs improvement," " inadequate," or " missing."
In summary: 51 elements were adequate, 11 were rated as needing improvement, 29 were inadequate and eight were missing.
da'partofitsreview, I requested the DPC staff to evaluate the significance of ctch item scrutini=ed. Among the 51 adequate ratings, 14 dealt with major planning -
criteria. Of the 11 items for which needs improvement ratings were determined, cix were major items. The 29 inadequate ratings contained 19 issues identified ca major concerns. The eight missing items contained seven deemed essential to any plan substantially co= plying with federal regulations.
Ensed on the review su=marized above, and set forth in more detail in the attached item by item analysis, I have concluded that the submitted material is unsatisfact-ory for presentation to the Disaster Preparedness Commission for certification to l
the Federal Emergency Management Agency. The staff review was necessarily limited to the material submitter'..
Any resubmission, based on our critique should be forwarded in its entiret.y for our reevaluation against the Federal evaluation criteria.
Sincerely, i
I W.
C. HENNESSY l
Chairman
~
Att.
cc:
Mr. Cohalan
l d
e DISASTER PREPAREDilE55 C0teil5510N Review of Shoreham Offsite [mergency Plan A.
Assignment of Responsibility (Organf ration Control)
Planning Standard Primary responsibilities for emergency response by the nuclear facility licensee, and by State and local organtrations within tie Emergency Planninal Zones have been assigned, the emergency responsibilities of the various supporting organlaations have been specifically established, and each principal rssponse organlaation has staff to respond and to augment its Initial response on a continuous basis, item DPC Rattnq
- Comments A
NSI I
M la I
lb
_ _ I__
Letter of agreement needed for county notification to Broothaven an<l change to State Plan for 5.C., since BNL notification is State responsibility. Clarification needed for consean.1 an.1 direction upon Governor declaring an emergency.
Ic
_I There is no block diagram showing Interrelationships of governmental agencies, etc.
Id I
le I
Although 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> per day emergency response is Indicated de.llcated coassunication lints between County Coeuunication Center at Police lleadquarters and County EDC: between inC and [BS radio station and between News Center and EOC have to be provided.
- A Adequate NSI - Needs Some Improvement I - Inadequate M - Missing t
I DISA51ER PREPAp[DNE55 C0t94IS$10N Review of 8
Shoreham Of fsite Emergency Plan A.
Assignment of Responsibility (Organization Control) Cont.
e Item DrC Rattne
- Comment s A M5I I
M 2a I
There is no table (matrix), clearly and concisely, sunenarlaing primary and support responsibilities or the relationship between agencies.
I 2b I
Authorftles only cited in procedures: gives authority for county actions. not overall plan. Recommend specific page listing autherf tles with brief esplanation.
l
(
3 I
Incomplete listing of all required letters of agreement.
l 4
I Not specifically stated but laylled in Section IV of the plan.
l l
e' A - Adequate NSI - Needs Some Improvement I - Inadequate M - Missing 9
t e
t I
DISASTER PREPAREDME55 CDPMISSION Review of 4
Shoreham Offsite Emergency Plan B.
Onsite [sergency Organization Planning Standard On shif t f acility licensee responsibilities for emergency response are unaaelguously defined, adequate staf fing to provide Inttlat f acility accident response in try functional areas is maintlened at all times, timely augmentation of response capabilltles is available, and the Interfaces among various onsite response activilles and offsite support and response activities are specified.
Ites DPC Rattne
- Comments A N5I I
M lhls section not appilcable to the County Review.
m w -
N N
e m
m M
4 eimmmme 4
9 0
4 1
d le f
i t
e g
n t
n ee a
i hd n
e ti gt b
ir t n so s
ae ep i
e dp fb u
t f
l s n
ae l
e t v ie m
sa ws e
h n
e.
l eo ae t p r
cs as A
on te l o Sr f
p o
ds el ne ha r
ar T r e
e t
ed t
.d t e e
e an ef l
t n t
Sa an l
t o ep S
y s
t d
t ae ee n
dh ht u
at t a o
a d
c sg yp on bu e
cl h
c i.
a.
ep t
ne l
g e
oe t
om dk r
t g o
u ed p
sa bn p
t s
a.
u nf t
o c
s eo n
tat m
e He o
ee gl e
sE t
nb s
iI.
a s
n aa C
sht e
rp it s v
ra hio a
N n
ac t wp h
0 a
k 1
l
,s std o
5 P
en ncn o
5 do aaa r
y ai lt m B
1 1
c mt pnm 9
n a
oo PO e
nr rcc C
g et e
E r
en hp,
O S
e ba t es D
Sf m g
oed EeE er r
ki M
vo n
e o
g i ol f
n Dwe a
E et hr i
tf s
Rii e
s r
l s
Avs sh ari l
i Pef et ea a
ERf co tc c
M R
O r
ui-P ud bf s
m on s
e R
a sa
,f o
M ot e
E h
e d
n d
T c
r.
ene S
e e
t om nd A
r ed ase ae e
t S
h ca tir l n I
S nm sai pi a
D a
l u a
u t n tl q et q
se o e hb e
Nar 1 o d
i e sb a
s n
ae I
v ga oh l
I sy ut i
yl li tn e
ec m
va M
e iF e
c t
v r
cs o
u en r
o f o p
g s
fi m
n I
e et i
i R
a t
dr e
a d
ne m
R n
ap o
t a
ny D
N a
d O
C I
S 1
r g
P S
I s
i c d
~
r d
o n
t n e
p a
se e
N p
t eg u
S ur s
qe A
I g
em e
n rE I
5 s
i re N
n n
o n
ot p
a fi s
l s
e P
s -
e R
t r t
m na a
e c
a y
ee t
I 2
4 u
c mn q
i n
e e
e gs d
g n
A a 'e re re u
rs f
An A
e
~
c t
C I
I
~
l 1
t
. Dl5A51ER PRtrAREDNESS C089915510N Review sf Shoreham Offsite Emergency Plan D.
Emergency Classification System Planning Standard A standard emergency classification and action level scheme, the bases of which include facility system and ef fluent parameters, is in use by the nuclear facility licensee. and State and local response plans call for rellence on Information provided by facility licensees for determinations of minisus initial offsite response measures.
Ites opt Rating
- Conments A
N31 i
M 3
I 4
I Could not locate in Plan Procedure for Assessment and Dose Projection i
- A - Adequate 1851 - lleeds Some leprovement I - Inadequate M - Missing I
1 4
l i
l s
-~
?
I Dl5A51tR FREPAREDiet15 COMMISSION Review of a
Shreohem OffsIte Emergency Plan E.
Notification. Methods and Procedures Plannine Standard Procedures have been established for notification, by the,ilcensee of State and Isral response organli ti personnel by all response organlaationst the content of Initial and followup messapt to re ons and for notification of emergney s
established.
anning Zone have been Ites DPC Rating
- Comments A NSI I
M I
I i
2 2
At this time it is doubtful if the comemmications equipment needed to laplement these procedu are in entstence.
5 2
Procedures to coordinate between State and county procedures for activation ' f (55 cannot be fo o
6 I
A stren system is under development.
7 I
by occupants. Written messages are provided, but de not include the appropriate protective actions to b
- A-Adequate M51 - Meeds Some leprovement I - Inadequate M - Missing e
1 a
4 0
e I
l o
' DISASTER PREPAR[DN[55 CDPell5510M I
R:vlew af F.
Escreency Consuunications 4
Planning Standards Prowlstons esist for prompt consuunications among principal response organizations to emergency person.41 and to the public.-
Item DPC Rattne
- A MSI I
M la I
lb X
Equipment needed to implement this portion of the plan is not entirely in place as depicted in the plan by use of words such as will be and in the future. No diagrams on flow charts exist.
Ic I
l Id X
Same as cosament Ib.
le E
Same as comment Ib.
i A - Adequate N$l - Needs Some improvement I - Inadequate M - Missing e
h e
4 t
.1 O
t e
1 1
e t
I i
.=
-g E I
- I 7.,
=- m E
- 1 5 &
3
- t i i
EC r=
I 1
E E b
e
=
1 E
g&
E F
=
.E M
Ti
=
~
1 I
J' 4
3 0
em 4
I
=
l
-l l
l l
l s
5 l
l l
l l
l
~
8 a
g y
1 I
I I
I l
m
_i
(
1 l
l l
l e
E w
a k'
E
.i
=
E i
0 5
~
a h
}
i 6
9 m
=
=
4
n o-s ie l
t e e
as t
ns o
nlaudi h
e nsd e.
ise it i
ed a b
n ri e
dod r
lf r e
u o
h oao w.
hic sd o
er t
smo n
f s
os a
ws i
t ee c
cnr i
a u
f ed i
lh e c
at c e
i o p
thr s
it p ni e
iwd r
n o
irt a m
c ea,
e ht e b
t ncon d
I 4
t ca l
4 a
v u
hfd o
woa hs dsn nti s
n an t
o d
n i
i doe e
t e ph m
a l
s m
m N
n fli o
r 0
a t al C
o 1
l t pb f
5 P
oi a n
5 nct i
I y
ns l
c ei e r
f n
br e
PD e,
pe t
C g
l r
s r
l ea o
g S
e ih p
n Sfg wt) i E pE
,s t
s N
y n
n s
Due e)o e
iM E et h si i
Rit t rt s
Avs oa n
P :f woc a
[Rf od o r
M R
O hnl t
P I
m n r f
R a
ogo o.
e E
h n
t T
e si n S
r ino gc a
ot u
9 A
o sii l e q
S h
aat t
e I
S bma s,
d D
ec os a
cro pl n
i l
e I
dd et onl ho aa T m ir c
I eni pos y.
i athd t
ape n
nt h
e oses m
hi e
cttl v
i s b
o l aga r
bcnt p
udis e
pade l
ou erl e e
hbcr m
t na
- o li S
n oa(c e
o t c i n
I s
o yl i
t d
t el cb t
e a
l nu a
e m
baep R o
l ore C
N r
a g
f it eh P
n d
a mt D
I I
r vge S
a an o
N d
d nt i
n n
ena I
I I
I a
a de n
t at go e
n S
msni t
o lit a
i g
s l. ra u
t n
.um q
i a
i n.dr e
c n
o d
u n
d a
iognf m
c d
A
.on e
a b
I I
2 f
l t eii t
l I
P a(t I
c m
af i
r ymo A
l ocr b
f non u
nef o P
igni rit e
s mf n G
eoI i
k 5m b
5 3
g t
5 4
a Is 3
Ji 3
~
[
3, -
g SB u
t'
- B 52 E 5
==
- E
[b "g x og w
s.
m a e
g-E 8
m
- _E ~
T "I
E 3
g-
- 2. 0
- 5. 8
.I':t
.E B
- t "g
. I 5.
35
-= c y 3' 3-23 52
- =
r g5
=
uy
=
- t e
a
- s t:
tt 3
in si
$4
_3 8
i
=
1 I
I I
I I
e l
8 r
e 1
I
-l
.I,
I I
i.
,t J
. 2 1
g I
I l
l I
l a
-I
-l I
l
-l I
r 8
3
=
=
5 a
e t
4 4
m U
W
i l
DISASTER PREPARtDttE55 COPN13510N Review sf Shoreham Offsite Emergency Plan.
4 st.
f_m.crg ye racilities and Equirmaedn Planning Standard Adequate emergency f acilities and equipment to support the emergency response are provided and maintained.
Item DPC Rating
- Consments A
NSI I
M 3
I 4
I 1
I 10 1
Cannot find Inventory check procedures.
II I
the plans are not clear in identifying the makeup of the emergency hits. Do not address communication equipment.
A - Adequate NSI - Needs Some leprovement I - Inadequate M - Missing 4
9 g
e 9
s
I J.
?
J t
i i
=
e I
t g
C
_=
N
- i
_= r ea at.i s.
r 22."
E.
B
.=j 1
en s.
s.:
a-1
=s i
n
}
_2 e
f e
Mi 8
l I
I l
l l
2
_E -
_I
_I i
I I
I I
l x
i s
y I
I I.
3
.I I
l
-I I
I l
l l
3 I
S
=
1
-5 E
g c
=
c.
b i
t
-i
9 i
DISASTER PREPAREfWIISS Cop 9tl5510N Review of Shoneham Offsite Emergency rien i
1.
Ar,cident Assessment Planning Standard Adegnate cethods, systems and equipment for assessing and maaltoring actual or potential of fsite consecuences of a redlological emergency condition cre in use, item OPC Rattna
- Comments A NSI I
M j
1 x
l l
l 1
8 I
Accident and Dose Assessment to be provided later.
1 i
j x
- A - Adequate NSI - Needs Some improvement
'.I - Inadequate M - Missing 4
e
/
,1 s
9 4
4 s
o Ol5A51ER PPtPMiti [5' Coml5510N Review sf Sho.-eham Offsite Em rgency Plan
.l.
f'rntective Resj.onse Planning Standard A range of protective actions have been developed for the pitse exposure pathway EPZ for emergency workers and the public. Guldelines for the cholce si protective actions during an emergency, consistent with federal guidance, are developed and in place, and protective actions for the Ingestion en-posn e pathway (PZ appropriate to the locale have been developed.
l l
Item DPC Rattne
- Comuments,
l A
IISI I
N f
1 2.
I Should include specific information to be coordinated with and/or entracted from Ilcensee plan for evacuation of onsite personnel. Specific onsite evacuation Information could not be located.
9 I
10a _
J _
Monitoring points are not listed. Nf0 senttoring points should a' Iso be identitled.
106 I
Two maps are required to IIst 1980 population by season.
Ice I
No system for notificationof hotels / motels could be located and should be included.
- A - Adequate M51 - Needs Some :enrovement I - Inadequate H - Missing G
J
a
/)N
' Eth:
a q- ;
.e s
C-
.7-
.: w..
,, c..
I
- .7 18 am:h 1980
~..'.;*.
- e..
Dr. mnemkp.bau, Ma ap Nuclear IAe*n=4ng Divisicu img Taland rMgheing r'..3
.g jg.g, 175 anst old C - W aced Eicksville, New York 10081 Ofb..
osar oe. Cu,n.
mmk you for the package of infomaticn you forWA 4m1w14ng the federal safety criteria for nuclear power plants and the Suffolk County Plan for a
.s relaar irridant at Img Island TMgheing's new plant at Sbombem.
i Mr., Alan Nelsen of the Office of Encinaaring in WIO developed this plan in close carmal.tstim and coordination with local authorities, the New York State Bureau of Fadiningical Benith and the State Office of Disaster Preparedness.
'Ibere was e maidarable persmn1 em'aht m,mg all these parties during the develvW, of the plan, which is evident in the fininhad product.
~.S
'Ibe uniqueness of the plan is that it a~'ina-in one volune the emergency msponses and specific yr Wdres of the State as well as the appropriate Suffolk County acencies for an imidar* at ShamMm.
'Ibe method used in this plan's cmatico, 6.e., having the utility operator, local vvr.wt officia1= and State mpresentatives all participate in the myiew arsi revision of plan drafts developed by the utility, was successful. It is our k++nticn to me-11 this procedure to cmsultants who will be developing plans for other sites, ani to Ibrther m ##that they use the Shorh plan as a m*el arri guide.
g.F.
Porticns of the Shoreham plan have alacdy been updated to inclu:!e scme of the latest Nuclesr BeC41atory Caen:ission's 6v =ut.s, but Ibrther work will bave to be dme in light of IAPEG - 0654 ani whatever alternatives am finally adopted in the revision td 10 CFR Part 50, as well as the revised State eencept of -W respmse procedures.
'Ibe State, and more perticularly the Department of Health, is developing a policy that Ir. clear safety plans that includes widespmad evacuation possi-bilities cust provide that the State is the ecntrolling authority over the decixim to a: tier such evacuation. This would allow State goverrrent to coortiinate local level ecergency actions and fme the utility to concentrate cn i v111ng the incidant at the facility. ' Ibis concept is the subject of a
.s,. am.
- p
seru d
e dW c
d nH o
e aN r
d P
l.
d rW n
EN a
s.
em se o
or d
l e
ir ru d
mf Ct u
a l
0d dn c
1 n e
Rn o
i l
ew..
i h
e e
ey t at hl bc u
t a n
nh o r
se it r de eg hi nn cr t wn ae o
g re iwai s
um oe st re s
saa er s
el ieu t a t
ra l c n
n r
Pea er e
ne rv co o
ion f
e mm e
oA nd t g s
oe C
a n
it
.i t n o
h t e ra iTt al o
tP cp I
4 pg rEf om sn o o l o ni pe ec ar h y r
N n
ru dtt n
D a
td n i ee 1
l afl he 5
P l n oi tb 5
ao E
b y
1 ii na nt
?
H c
ct
.ol eo s
H n
ea Dii en i
O e
pu t a w
h C
g sc srv t e t
r a
eoa ev Sf e dv np ba r
Som ne o e h
o E
E N w a
Znh d
f r
rt es Dee eo re t e e
El t cf oht ec l
R wi n
ft c li b
Aos PRf as ue pv a
l e E of mr l
E f
R O
ui I sf oe i
bt L
a cS a
P m
mi e
v al ery nl a-R a
i til ea E
h t c ut s ei r
T e
aa onu bc e
S r
hf reo o
w A
o t
i tS o
g S
h c
ner o
p n
I S
D di oh e nf n
i ef it s o
a s
di t
e m
ee usl an t
is nc atd vt M
mp cou he n
ms amo m
e o
vl w st i
co ea t r c
M et E
na i
r ysM ep f
d reN me f
se as eD u
e i t msr e
s t
oo rr a
i a
t c rr go s
u II PcN Af I
qe dan I
I tneme v
M o
rp g
m n
i i
I I
I I
t e
)
a m
t.
R o
I S
n C
S I
o P
N s
c D
d
(
e e
e A
N 9
I sn op 1
s 5
e N
R e
n d
a h
1 j
v e
0 0
0 0
o e
i i
1 1
1 1
l t
t l
a c
uq e
t e
o d
eP A
A J
~
(
l
~
ic h
m c
a a
n e
y d
ta wo d
h n
s a
h o
t no de e
p b
o l
o.
e td v
e e
t m d
nr ei e
mf ipn b
ue na q
s s
c eeb tn s
e e
o ht m
i t o m
r n
o a
t n C
n sa e
i c c
l I
i s
y t
rt r
oi e
/l N
n h
di O
a t
nb I
l o
aa S
P p
i 5
o l a y
s ec l
c l
n tt p
n a
nr o
e ou C
g n
so r
o rh 5f e i
e 5om t
p2 e
1 EN w[
l f
I ee p
od IEit m
e R vi o
rt Aes c
ec PRf be E
f e
mj R
O r
uo P
i nr m
u p
R a
q e
E h
e he T
e r
th S
r t
A o
I t
S h
I c
g I
S I
e:
n D
jn i
c oo s
e ri s
S pt i
a M
tt 9
1 os 1
n n
M 5.
so 1 s ei 1Dt ot s
d~a e
ey c
t ll no a
ba al u
an l e q
T a Pr e
dan I
I tn eme v
M o
rp g
m n
I I
i I
t e
a m
R o
)
I-S o
N I
5 T
t N
n s
de c
e
(
A N
e s
no I
p S
s N
e R
m I
2 e_
e 0
1 e
t v
1 t
I I
a t,
u g
q e
e d
to A
r P
A l.
l
DISASTER PREPAREDMC55 COMMISSION Rzwiew sf Shorehae Offsite [mergency Plan K.
Radinlogcal[sposureControl Planning Standard h ans for controlling radiological esposures, in an emergency, are established for emergency workers. The means for controlling redlological esposuse guidelines consistent with [PA [mergency Worker and Lifesaving Activity Protective Action Guides.
Item DPC Rating
- A N5I I
M 3a I
The 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> per day capability could not be Identified.
i 3b I
4 I
Could not locate.
Sa I
s 5b I
1he waste disposal area was not *Jdressed.
l t
4 I
I DISASTER PRtrAntDNE55 CDPMISSION Review of shorehaas Offsite Emergency Plan 8
L.
lWfical and Public Ilealth Support Planning Standard Arrangements are made for medical services for contaminated injured Individuals.
Item DPC Rattnq
- Cossments A
NSI I
M LI I
No 11st of hospitals and ambulances and addresses or current or future capabilities.
L4 I
fio medical f acilities, ambulances, hospital-aabulance communications or an6ulance coord-inator is mentioned.
J
- A - Adequate M51 - Needs Some Improvement
! - Inadequate M - Hlssing me i
5 o
t s
en ro ui d s) ei3 cc oe.
rdc p
e hS yc(
ci nhe ewr g
u a yd be h
c cso anr 9
eape
+
nmS H i
eD dh et e d
h nft ao p
n x ni s
eo t
id n
et e e
b pt m
ia m
ort J
o t cs C
s ses ddi e
eat n i N
n s
0 a
yes 1
l rra 5
P ti 5
nu,
y eqe 1
N c
eed P
n rra D
e m
4 C
g dt r
nae S
e
- a. h r Sf m t a E cE y
Mwe ras l
ein f et vro g
Pii oei n
Avs ctt i
P ef eic s
ERf rra s
R O
c P
f e
M m
of v R
a oi 4
E h
s t
I e
nt c M
S r
ore A
o i at 5
h t po 1
S a
r e
D nt p t
aa a
9 hs u
lpt a q
x l
e s
ere d
n er a
o ev n
i hoo I
t T ct a
d r
e e
p I
p o
O l
e t
v t
n e
n e
d e
d m
e e
ic r
v c
a o
a r
p t
y s
r M
m o
t I
P n
d e
- e d
r e
m o
n a
r e
S a
d n
I n
d t
g a
n t
s n
t a
a d
i S
R e
e n
y I
N n
g r
C S
I a
n e
P N
v D
l i
o P
nn c
I S
y a
e r
l r
A N
t P
n r
e o
e f
e R
t s
a d
n u
n a
q m
e a
lp e
I d
y t
A r
l i
e a
v r
o e
A c
n c
- e p
I 1.
1 e
t V
T S
Ta
~.-
w em
=
u.
T28
==
,3 IE g.
E 5 E5 I
- I w
Lu vC eo b
W M.wI D5 w
cu E3.
Et gic
's
=
un" kw J
=
5
.5
=
= 1 Er r
m z
5 2 E
L:
3 6
I 4
I ek
- 3 Si "l
m2
==
v-o o,g l
O we
[
l E
D 15 v 3
I I
I I
I t
=
l i
I t
i
=
, g
-C 5
- 2. E 3
,e I
- ?.
E 6
o g
3,-
~
~
~
a
=
U
(
O-
.I t*
ug i
2
i.
l l.
Ol5 ASTER PREPAREDNESS CDPM.5510N l
Review of Shoreham Offsite Emergency Plap e
N.
Isercise_and Drill (cont.)
9 item
_0PCRatine
- Ceasents l -
j A NSI I
M i
i
+
3a a
i j
i 1
3b I
==
4 3c I
i
.I i
i I
M I
4 i
i k
I e
4 t
?
4 3r I
i j
A - Adequate NSI - pleeds $cee leprovement I - Inadequate M - Missing a
e t
b 4
2e I
E'2 3 E
=I,v
-E asa re:
r:
f.iEea
=.1 a e 2a r
==
z E4
_2 1
i I
-l l
l l
l F
- -1 I
I I
I 1
=
j a
i s iI I
I
.I I
I 5=
A 3=
7; !
n 5
i i
4 g
e
1 015 ASTER PREPAREf1NE55 Cotell5510N Review of 0.
Radioloal,caLtacrgencyResponseTrainig shorehae Offsite Emergency Plan 4 Radiological emergency response training is provided to those Wie may be called on to gsslst in an emergency.
Plannino Standard item DPC Rattnq
- Comment s A NSI I
H I
I
_jt_
x
.fA-j I
The only problem area is the delegation of State tralning responsibilities which gives all responsibility and coordination to the Director of 00P.
1 X
1here is no prowlston for anr.ual retraining.
4
- s A - Adequate NSI - Needs Some Improvement
'I - Inadequate H - Missing e
9 i
O!5A51ER PREPARElmE55 E0Pell5510N RIvlew sf Shoreham Offsitz Emergency Plan a
- r. Resyonsibility for the Planning Ef fort: Develoinent, Periodic Review and Distribution of Emergency Plans Planning Standard Responsibilities for plan developt and review and for distribution of emergency plans are established, and planners are properly trained.
Item DPC Rating
- A NSI l
M I
I 5
s 2
x 3
I 4
l I
5
- A - Adequate NSI - Needs Some improvement I - Inadequate M - Missing O
e li 1
9
' e I
OISA5ita entrARfDNE55 Com!55101 Review of
(
Shoreham Of fsite Emergency Plan P.
Resjonsibility (cont.)
=
g Item DPC Rating
- Comuments A N5I I
N 6
X There is no listing of supporting plans, their source or their authorttles.
f
---X-There is no index of procedures nor Sections of the Plan.
1 I
Cross reference is incomplete. table of contents is not all-inclusive.
l 10_
I l
l
\\
l
..h A - Adequate NSI - Needs Some Improvement ' 'I - Inadequate F - Missing 4
'Y
-f f'. ~:..
hIadl"-
/~ 2
~
/ffE10
~'
LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COM PANY 17 5 EAST OLO COUNTRY ROAD. M ICKSVI LLE. NEW YORK 11801 MATTMCW C. ComOAMO. M CL May 10, 1982 01337 CENED Commissioner William Hennessey Chairman Disaster Preparedness Commission 11 Jggg IDr. David Axelrod ej N.Y.S. Dept. of Health g3 ENEN Empire State Plaza EMCOMMISSIONS Tower Building Albany, N. Y.
12237
Dear Commissioner Hennessey:
On August 11, 1981, the Suffolk County Legislature passed Resolution No. 694, approving a contract for the devel-opment of a local off-site emergency plan for the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station; the contract had previously been signed on behalf of the Suffolk County Executive and LILCO..
A copy of the contract is attached to this letter.
Under the September 18th contract, County emergency planners, funded by $245,000 from LILCO, were to prepare the local off-site emergency plan for Shoreham, to be completed within six months of the contract's effective date.
County emergency planners, assisted in various ways by LILCO, have in fact produced a local off-site emergency plan for Shoreham.
It is bound in two binders, which were produced at the request
'~
of the County Planning Department, entitled "Suffolk County Radiological Emergency Response Plan" and "Suffolk County Radio-logical Emergency Response Plan - Appendix A."
LILCO hereby submits the local off-site emergency plan for Shoreham to the New York State Department of Health for its review.
Also included is a separate volume containing the miss-ing Suffolk County Health Department Section which was prepared by Stone & Webster at the request of the Suffolk County Planning Department.
This section has not yet received final County review.
4::
"',a..
Commissioner William Hennessey Chairman Disaster Preparedness Commission May 10, 1982 Page 2 As you know, the County has recently refused to endorse the local off-site emergency plan prepared by its own planners,
and has attempted to return the funds provided to it by LILCOHowever, politica under the contract of September 18.
' ment of the plan is not required for its submission to and review by New York State and FEMA; the contracted work, essentially com-The County can certainly fine-tune plated, is ready for review.this local off-site plan if its further emergency plan fforts so require.
Very tru
- yours, 4
~
Matthew C. Cordaro, Ph. D.
Vice President MCC:tz Attach.
l MM*
e h
e e
W O
e l
~
e e
ITEM #3B bgmm M.
m o
e e
e b
e
~
~ STATE OF NEW YORK 0:5P.MfS.u T -
de.TP podI@
omCE OF HEAI.TM SNG A
MEMORANDUM b
TO:
Mr. Lipsen, Area Administrator New Rochelle Area Office DEC 151951 FROM:
Mr. William B. Carmello, Director Bureau of Health Facility Coordination n,qgyli$,.. S~TRT!:~Y hc y84 VRi?
GOC?
d
SUBJECT:
Radiological Emergency Plan DATE:
December 4,1981 In connection with possible patient evacuation from residential health care facilities near the Indian Point ruclear power reactor you requested and received from those facilities disaster plans describing evacuation to loca-tions beyond the ten mile emergency planning zone.
We now have a similar request for plans from facilities within a ten mile radius of the Shoreham nuclear power plant, Suffolk County. The attached map shows the location and the planning zone.
Our files indicate the following RHCF's are located within this zone:
Oak Hollow Nursing Center, Middle Island Port Jefferson NH & HRF, Port Jefferson Suffolk Infirmary, Yaphank Sunrest NH, Port Jefferson Woodhaven Manor NH & HRF, Port Jefferson Station Crest Hill HRF, Middle Island.
~
Will you please correspond with each of these facilities and request from them their plans for relocation of patients beyond the ten mile zone should there be a radiological emergency resulting from problems at the Shoreham nuclear-power plant.
Please send me a copy of the letters as well as the responses that you receive. Also, please comp'lete the attached tabulation fann on the basis of information received from the facilities and send me a copy with any appro-priate coment on each plan and whether you deem it acceptable.
If there are any questions, contact either me or Mr. Howard.
WBC:EH:et Att.
e;y ygp' cc: Ms. Scanlan
.;..GT de:l'"
. Mr. Davidoff, '
Mr. Howard
'; M iS8;
.RCCMil:tf7g3g((;gg
?..I5 I'
January Monthly Report January 18, 1982 J
Suffolk County Radiological Emergency Response Plan 1.....
g[
General - Since there are several new Legislators, a brief explanation of gg the purpose of this monthly report is necessary.
On September 18, 1981 the Suffolk County Legislature authorized the Director, M
Suffolk County Planning Department, to accept funding from the Long Island Lighting Company to prepare the Suffolk County Radiological Emergency Response Plan (RERP). As part of this authorization the Legislature requested that it receive monthly reports on the status of this planning effort.
The County RERP is a document which, when completed, will i
consist of two major sections.
The overall response plan will delineate the response activities of al-1 County agencies and their method of interface with one another in order to cope with any radiological emergency.
The second major section, referred to as Appendix A, is the evacuation plan for the 10
., mile Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ).
Phase I - Asse'ss Suffolk County Planning Needs
~
This phase of the contract can be considered complete. The needs and the respective roles of the various County response agencies have been identified. Another meeting was held with representatives of the Department of Health Services to resolve some of the conflicts between their view of response activities and those of other County agencies.
~
Phase II-Development of Draft Suffolk County Radiological Emergency Response Plan Coments have been received on the draft Comunications section sent out during November.
The coments were incorporated into the draft and resubmitted for additional review and comment along with Communications Procedures, Comunications Equipment and Training Requirements.
The S.C. Police Department portion of the plan shoulo be sent out for review and, comment in the near future.
Phase V..- Preparation of RERP Implementing Procedures Procedures are being prepared concomitant with the individual section of the response plan, i.e., Comunications Procedures, S.C.P.D. response procedures.
Phase VI-Notification System Integration l
Predicated on a report by its consultant LILCO presented its proposed public notification system concepts to the staff of l
the Emergency Planning Group. The public notification system (notification of all residents within the ten mile inhalation planning zone) will be by a radio controlled siren system capable of being activated from either SCPD headquarters or the Emergency Operations Center (EOC).
Special facilities (schools, hospitals, nursing homes, etc.) will be notified by tone / voice receivers in addition to the siren system.
Evacuation Planning:
The following sumarizes the more important activities with regard to the evacuation planning effort for Appendix A to the Suffolk County Radiological Emergency Response Plan.
In December we met with KLD Associates Incorporated, a local consulting firm hired by the utility'to evaluate the routing and time estimates we derived for the evacuation portion of the plan.
In order for KLD to complete its work for the utility, it was necessary to' supply them with extensive background data. A schedule was devised where we would supply certain data by January 18, 1982 and the remainder by February 1, 1982 and March 1, 1982.
A good deal of time was spent preparing this data since it was not in
.the same form required by the consultant.
Basically the information provided was:
. a map depicting the roadway system and CD's used for evacuation.
. a map depicting the origin nodes and destination nodes of population groups within the EPZ.
. an origination / destination table showing the number of trips from each origin node to each destination node.
. a set of histograms for each origin nede showing vehicle loading on the evacuation road network over time.
. a detailed map of each location where police will establish a road block or traffic control post.
. a detailed summary of each post and the strategies that will be employed at them.
IW -
All work has been completed with the exception of the traffic control' posts, which we hope to have completed by the 27th of this month.
The County Attorney's Office is continuing to pursue the use of district owned school buses during an evacuation. One district, Middle Country,, voted not to allow its buses to be used in an emergency. However, i
the County Attorney's Office is attempting to get the district to reconsider its decision.
There has been no word on the utility's progress in securing the use of privately owned school buses during an emergency. '
The remainder of the month has been spent on writing a summary on cach of the 19 zones, which details the number of people, special facilities, vehicle routing,and bus routes for each zone. These will be incorporated 1nto the draft.
1 3
Lee E. Koppelman Distribution: All County Legislators Char'les Daverio LILCO i
175 E. Old Country Road Hicksville, New York 11801 Mr. Donald Davidoff, Manager Nuclear Emergency Planning Group State of New York, Dept. of Health Tower Bldg, Room 1750 Empire State Plaza Albany, New York 12237 Ms. Pat Dempsey Assistant County Attorney e
6 hg eme h
.m 3-1
~.
M5. 1.(AVILLV T T' dTATE OF NEW YORK h' DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH tower Sult. DING e THE GoVEftNoR NEL5oN A. RoCKEFELLER EMPIRE STATE PLAZA e ALB ANY, N.Y.12237 91 SAVID AXELfloO. M.D.
Comedaadener February 18 1982 uNiff!fx'-
Y i
Mr. Robert C. Meunkle p,,3, O bb2 Project Director Evacuation Planning Group
' ;.-l.2 Ud Ei.;g, H. Lee Dennison Building, lith Floor
' * e,.l!Ai2h gd..
Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, New York,11788
Dear Mr. Meunkle:
Don Davidoff has shared with me your February 5 letter concerning
~
radiological emergency public information activities, and I'd like to address the concerns you raised.
In addition to my responsibilities as Public Affairs Director for the j
State Health Department, I am the State PIO and lead spokesperson in the event of a radiological emergency at any of the nuclear power stations in New York.
The State plan and the plans developed by the affected counties call for all news relating to an accident or an emergency to be released from a Joint News Center. For the three other plant sites in the State - Oswego, Wayne and Westchester counties - news centers funded by the utilities have been i
established.
The purpose of a " joint" news center is to facilitate coordination and i
verification of information before it is released to the public, as well as to have a specific site with which reporters can become familiar and which they would know in advance vill be the source of their information. This concept has worked well in the two exercises we. have already undertaken (Nine Mile Point and Cinna) and when we actually faced an accident at the Ginna plant on January 25.
I expect it will also work well in our exercise scheduled for e
March 3 at Indian Point.
Whi,le the PIOS for the State, the county and the utilities work together closely at these news centers, there remains a distinct definition of roles that ensures that there is no collusion and no appearance of collusion.
In brief, these are the roles:
4
- 1) The utility spokespersons speak only to what is happening inside the plant boundary and any off site monitoring which they may be conducting. Among the issues included here are announcements of declaration of emergency conditions (i.e., unusual event, alert, site area emergency, general emergency), reactor / protective barrier malfunctions, dose projections inside the plant, estimated or actual release rates, etc.).
- 2) The county spokespersons speak only to county response activities.
Among these activities would be activation of emergency operations centers and reception centers, public notification, mobilization of personnel and resources, field monitoring data, county decisions for protective actions. Unless the Governor has declared a State Disaster Emergency, the county PIO is also responsible for coordinating the release of Emergency Broadcast System (EBS) messages containing protective action directions determined by the county decision-maker.
- 3) The State spokespersons speak to State activities only, including ~
deployment of State personnel and resources, dose assessment, and actions to protect the public. In the event the Governor does make a disaster declaration, the State PIO then becomes responsible for coordinating the release of the EBS messages.
At times, county and State roles overlap, and we've found that being together at the news centers helps us immensely to coordinate our releases, verify their accuracy and present the total picture of government activities.
We've also found that it enables us to truly work as a team, helping each other when one's resources are stretched to the limit.
At no time in my experience in these exercises has there ever been a joint news release between the government entities and the utlities. These remain separate and distinct, although as the situation allows announcements are made in coordinated news briefings so the reporters can get the whole picture.
When the accident occurred at Cinna, it took us several hours to get our State spokespersons to the Joint News Center in Rochester. Until they arrived, we stayed in constant contact with the county PIOS from our emergency operations center in Albany, and got our news releases out via the wire services and a group of reporters from the Albany area who immediately came out to the news center the Stite has also established in the same building that houses our EOC. We were available the entire time for consultation with the counties, and the counties thoughtfully provided us copies of their releases to~ Albany via telecopier systems in place at both ends.
f f
e y -
r-
=
1 I would be delighted to meet and talk with you and Mr. DeMartini to begin preparing for the Shoreham exercise which I understand is tentatively scheduled for June.
I would be available any time af ter the 5th of March that is convenient to you. At that time, I would be happy also to bring copies of the releases that were issued at the other exercises so you'll have a " paper trail" of the various roles the PIOS play at the news center.
If you have any other questions or concerns about the information functions or procedures, please feel free to call me at any time at (518) 474-7354.
Sincerely, w lf
-l Barbara Thomas-Noble Director, Public Affairs N cc:
Mr. Davidoff 9
6 g g as e
h l
I i
i l
i s
4
p r
5HW STATE OF NEW YORK OlVistoN OF MILIT ARY ANo N AV orrect or ossasten emepaa SoutmE Am DIS T A8CT OFFICE f.orgn Hoao
,,.APR 141982
....m........
T0:
Mr. Donald A. DeVito - Direc%)'0 LOGICAL Ef4ERGE!!CY PREPAREDNESS GROUP FROM:
Southern District DATE:
April 12, 1982 RE:
Suffolk County Attached is the original of a letter received from Mr. William Regan, Director of the Department of Emergency Preparedness in Suffolk County.
I am aware that Mr. Regan has verbalized this stand to Mr. Davidoff and Mr. McQueen as well as those in ODP; therefore, I am sending a copy of this letter to both Mr. Davidoff and Mr. McQueen.
Probably the most exasperating part in the recently conducted Indian Point Exercise to the Chief Executives of Westchester and the other counties was the fact of the siren failure. Suffolk County did have observers in the Westchester County EOC, including Mr. Regan himself.
I can understand and support the county's position of not wanting to do any type of exercise without the sirens installed and working.
As further developments occur, I will keep you advised.
i u--
vfw -%
L. Erlandson pistrictDirector RLE/bv l
Attachment cc Mr. Donald Davidoff (-
Mr. Bruce McQueen Mr. William Regan
~
~
.p COUNTY OF SUFFOLK
[
y e y,
\\
'N' P-a
?
y mf Prrra F. t'amas am couwevsuscur m DEPARTMENT CF EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS unLuAas r. nstaan omeeciose March 19, 1982 Roy L. Erlandson, Director Southern District NYSDMNA CPD Creek Road Poughkeepsie, New York 12601
==Dear
- ==
'the County of Suffolk is tentatively expecting to be involved in an ex-ercise that will test ist ability to respond to a radiological incident at the "Shoreham" nuclear power plant sometime in September of 1982.
" Shore-ham" is not presently operative but has an "on-the-line" target date for 1983.
I refer you to the requirements of the Fiani Rule of NCR 10 CFR Parts 50 and 70 EMERGENCY PLANNING. In particular Appendix E of 10 CFR Part 50 expand-ed to include Section IV-D Notification Procedures and in specific (3).
(31 "A licensee shall have the capability to notify responsible State and local governmental agencies within 15 minutes after declaring an emergency. The licensee shall demonstrate that the State / local officials have the capability to make a public l
~
motification decision promptly on being informed by the licensee -
~~
of an emergency condition.
By July 1, 1981, the nuclear power reactor licenses shall demonstrate that administrative and physi-cal means have.been established for alerting and providing promet instructions to the public within the plume exposure pathway EPZ.
~
The design objective shall be to have the capability to essentially comolete the initial notification of the public within the plume exposure pathway EPZ within about 15 minutes.
The use of this notification capability will range from immediate notification of the public (within 15 minutes of the time that State and local officials are notified that a situation exists requiring urgent action) to the more likely events where there is substantial time available for the State and local governmental officials to make judgment whether or not to activate the public notification system.
Where there is a decision to activate the notification system, the State and local officials will determine whether to activate the en-tire notification system simultaneously or in a graduated or staged manner.
The responsibility for activating such a public notifica-tion systiim shall remain with the appropriate government authorities."
ea som i n:
e
- v. - -- wrw vann i i eso m.,,,,,,,
-3 To clarify this letter, this department would like to go on record and request that no exercise be held until warning sirens are completely installed in the 2, 5, 10, mile EPZ's and tested before a full-scale evacuation exercise is held in SuffoIA County Very truly yours, e -
W Director Dept. of Emergency Preparedness WER/mg O
e e
em w
e 6
e
~.
m.__.
~_ _ _
w STA.TE OF NEW YORK ph DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH E.JOFFICE OF PUBLIC HEALTH TC':CR ogsto NG e THE GQvERNCR N EL$QN A. MOCF.EFELLER EMPl AE ST ATE PLAZ A S
ALB ANY, N.Y.12237 cm3 ausgssoo. u.o.
LOCAL HEALTH MANAGEMEHT c a
.e j
mLLsAu r. LaAvy ste,.= c. m Au cwit, u.o.
~~
November 17, 1980 Mr. Richard A.
S t. rang Deputy Commissioner Suffolk County Department of Transportation 65 Jetson Lane Hauppauge, NY 11787
Dear Mr. Strang:
This is a belated response to your letter of September 26, 1980, concerning relocation centers as,part of the Suffolk County Radiological Emergency Preparedness Plan.
I also ac' knowledge your correspondence with FEMA on the same subject.
Before attempting to answer your questions, I need to address two organizational items.
First, we must deal with only one agency at the County level as we develop o'ur emergency plans.
The-lead agency in the seven operational counties is the Department or Office of Emergency Preparedness.
We certainly do not wish to dictate how Suffolk County crganizes its affairs, but we do need to deal with a single agency.
The second issue flows from the first.
Under the proposed FE:iA regulations pertaining to nuclear emergencies, FE.V will decl only with states.
It would follow that county
- ~
maastions should be raised with the Nuclear Emergency Planning Group, and not FEMA.
The volume of work which confronts us requires some ground rules.
Please accept the above requirements in that light.' Now, to answer your questions.
We do not concur with your selection of the SUNY at Stony Brook facility and the Suffolk County Community College at Selden.
Both of these sites fail to meet the NRC/ FEMA criteria-
- " relocation centers in hest areas which are at least 5 miles, and preferably 10 miles, beyond the boundaries of the plume er.posure EPZ" and New York State crit.:ria: " host areas should be at least 20 miles from the nuclear facility.
If necessary, host areas between 15 and 20 miles from the nuclear facility can be utilized."
3f. Strang Novemb3r 17, 1980
..=..
This is the only NRC/ FEMA criteria applicable to the selection of reception centers.
In writing the State criteria, we emphasized the NRC/ FEMA preference for at least 10 miles beyond the EPZ bohndary.
NUREG 0654/-FEMA REP 1 states that the 10-mile boundary for the plume exposure pathway EPZ is based upon the traditional design basis accident but that with a worst case core melt sequence, response efforts may need to be expanded beyond the 10 miles.
Indeed, during the Three Mile Island emergency, facing the oossibility of a serious core melt dsen, the NRC recommended that ovacuation plans for a 20-mile radius be prepared.
You indicate that the area around the Shoreham EPZ offers inadequate shelter and, therefore, you had to investigate shelter space between 10 and 15 miles from the plant.
There is no indication that you have considered shelter beyond 20 miles.
Both the Federal and State criteria explicitly recommend that relocation centers be at least 20 miles from the plant.
We strongly recommend that you further investigate relocation centers beyond 20 miles.
If you are unable to locate sufficient shelter beyond 20 miles, then some f acilities between 15 and 20 miles, such as the IRS f acility in Holtsville, would be acceptable.
However, the preponderance of hest area shelters should be beyond 20 miles from the plant.
Your evacuation plan for Shoreham assumes 20% of the
~
population would need public shelter accommodations with the remaining 80% finding their own accommodations.
However, the pre-liminary Shoreham evacuation plan that was submitted last year included the nssumption th:t 50% of relocated poisons would be provided public she: tor.
We have since studied this. issue carefully, examining a number of actual evacuations and discussing this with other States' planners and the American Red Cross.
Regarding the number of relocated persons that should be provided congregate care shelter in host areas, we have reached the following conclusions:
1.
We recommend that county plans identify congregate care shelter for 100% of the plume exposure EPZ population.
2.
We recc==end that county plans include detailed provisions for congregate care st.elter including agreements for 50% of the plume expcsure EP" population.
We recognize that counties may make detailed pro"isions for congregate care shelts:
_ ~
is excess of 50%.
You also refer to the Mississauga, Canada evacuation of November 1979.
You cite 3,000 (1.2%) of 250,000 evacuees as having utili:ed designated relochtien centers.
According to the study antitled Mississauca Evacuates:
A Repert en the Cicsine of Cab.ada's Ninth Lar:es: city prepared oy tne scs corpc ation, 9,050 housenolds or appr:r -=:cly 32,000 of 215,000 eva: ees.(151) recuired s:cce at congre a:e : re shelters.
Also, appre d-*:ely 5,000 persons' had to evacc re a se: nd nd -ke-d
- -= due t: in expansien of the avaructi:n ---= - ' the f ae:
ht: the i:1:i:1 relcct:ica centers Vere.".:: at i sOffi ier.: iista.. e fr:= the ei2=unti:n :One, This
' ~ ~
- typ t Of pr:rli: tha: Ve 0u50 lvrid Dy seltCling feC9gliOU l
e@** l '
hazard. erious 3-s s
ntial of a 4 mile because 3 or the pote s
uate center Y
from vac
.Mr. Strang distanctedc pt relo on preparatio ce to cation of thework e
n to able stru e
want more in ac ason rtainlywill
- antime, ve re ation to ha entersver, a popul unlikely a
time ce at l
me e
is zon.
ur we We the sa y.
rd ation all o r
r weve,is u.
In e
r eces c
s Moreo haza vacu spending Ho ua y. ifn rtant Jan sis alth the e s
plan.impo he now beyond in ba fic is limited
- urs, are unty th s sues i
yo h
co We a
rely a
unty onci even on ce y
and s Co spe l
Sin State SuffolkShoreham vailab e vido.f time rtainly
,o/, ld a
with for are r
B.Man ge a
ny c
e a
wo c Dn e ge ct r
Proje Em op ar u
Gr cle Nu ning Plan l
r 3gde
~~- -
Ga
,qan ces gill ggz etiO ar 1.h 0
- g e ca s
Ch*5 1
- O
.c e
4
b r,
./
FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
~
L__,_ a Region 11 26 Federal Plaza New York, New York 10007 October 28, 1980 Mr. Richard A. Strang, Deputy Ccmmissioner Suffolk County Department of Transportation 65 Jetson Lane Hauppauge, New York 11787
Dear Mr. Strang:
We have contacted the Treasury Department Regional Emergency coordinaror concerning your request to use the IRS facilities at Holtsville, N.Y. as a relocation center for housing evacuees frcm the ErZ around the Shoreham Euclear Power Station.
Ha agrees that, for the reason given by Director Laycock, the Holtsville facility cannot be used as a relocation Center.
The IRS requirements might change in the future and if so it might then be possible to comply with your request.
- However, this is unlikely.
Sincerely, l '/
~
r/,f
/ent T. Forde, Acring Director n
Plans and Preparedness Division e
S 9
m.
.I D2ptrtment of tho Tretsury int:rnal Revenu3 Servico l
jf P.O. Box 400, Heltsville, N.Y.11742 a
Nonh.AllanHe Region h eter M.nal Revenue Service Center
- Mr. Richard A. Strang, Deputy Commissioner Suffolk County Department of Transportation 65 Jetson Lane AUG 2 81980 Hauppauge, New York 11787 i
Dear Mr. Strang:
Please accept my apology fo'r the delay in responding to your letter concerning the use of the IRS facility at Holtsville l
of June 12, 1980 One of the reasons for the delayed as an emergency relocation center.
response was due to the fact that you had sent copies of your t
letter to two other levels within Treasury, namely June 12, 1980 This made the Commissioner of IRS and the Secretary of the Treasury.
it necessary that we coordinate our response with these offices to ensure that we were consistent in expressing a common opinion in our response to you.
The consensus within the Department of the Treasury is that the IRS facility in Holtsv111e not participate as a relocation center as a part of your evacuation plan. Supporting this decision is a Depart =cnt of the Treasury Circular,1r.melm' Planning Circular 18,'1973, which recommends that local No. 3 (Revised) dated Acril schools or, colleges be used as primary relocation housfag facilities during emergency conditions which warrant mass evacuacion.
In addition to the Department of the Treasury policy discussed above, there were other concerns about the use of this facility as an emergency relocation center, which we shared with your staff d a meeting on May 23, 1980.
centered around the security requirements which we are mandsted to A
comply with in terms of protection for our computer systems and the data they contain and the confiduatial tax infor=stinn which 4.s
)
i I
As you are no contained on te.x documents throughout the facility.
doubt aware, there are stringent Disclosure Laws which we have the responsibility to abide by in order to safeguard tax returns and Also at that meeting, we offered to assist in
)
the location of an al':ernata site and suggested St. Jcseph's College
.related doeurents.
-in Patchogue, Dowling College in Oakdale, The Colonie Hill Hotel l
l and ' Convention Center in Hauppauge, and the Suffolk County Complex However, for various reasons these alternate sites in Hauppauge.
! i vare rejected.
1 l
e 1
I
\\
e I
s.
]
4
.i
' ~ " ' '
'-=
~
.9r. Richard A. Strang, Deputy Commissioner
./
I am sorry that our decision could not be more favorable to your request.
i Sincerely, i
s c/
i j
Thomas
. Laycock i
Directo i
l 1
4 s
I
~ ~ I.
~
t l
i g
1 i
t,,
4 t
9 g
~j A Q
y#
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK es.~
- ,t-r.y) ha G eummer DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATICN June 12,1980 Mr. Thomas J. Laycock, Director Internal Revenue Service
- 1040 Waverly Avenue Holtsville, New York 11742 i
Dear Mr. I.aycock:
For over a year this Department has been actively engaged in preparing an evacuation plan, in accordance with Federal regulations, for the Shoreham Nucles.: Power Station. Our responsibility is to provide a viable plan which will provide the mechanism for evacuating the 160,000 residents who live within a' ten mile radius of the plant --
many of whom are employees of the IRS at Holksvine.
A' vitsi part of this plan involves securing temporary shelter for those individuals who will not have access to alternate housing should they be requested to vacate their private residences.
It is in reference to this latter facet of the evacuation plan that this Departme=t originally contacted your office in Holtsville, to solicit both your cooperation and assistance in providing such a public service to the citizens and ta:cpayers of Suffolk County. After receiving an i -- - initially positive response to our request, your office has apparently reconsidered and reversed its decision - rescinding the off-r of its I
services.
We fuily recognise and appreciate the technicalities and in,:envenience associated with providir.g shelter for evacuees, and understand your hesitancy and reluctance to participate frem a security standpoint. However, it should be noted that there has never been a mandated evacuation i= the United States due to an incident at a commercial nuclsar reactor. In addition, as documented in the Rasmussen Jf.eport, t!.e probability of an incident occurring of the type. and magnitude sufficic.t to cecessitate an e::acuation out to ten miles, is one chance per
(
binion reactor years of operation.
S l
na m-uay___
-2.'
Juno 12,1980 Mr. Thsmas J. Laycock
.There are several salient points regarding the evacuation plan in general and the proposed use of the IRS facility as it would relate to First, the conceptual the overan plan which we would like to reiterate.
base for the evacuation is a controned, systematic. zone-by-zone ovacuation downwind of the reactor. This means that only those zones in danger of exposure due to the prevailing wind at the time of an incident will be evacuated. As for providing relocation centers for these zones, the planning criteria used by this Department anowed for twenty percent (20%) of the population to relocate at designated centers.
This is a conservative estimate when compared to documented cxperiences, the most recent occurring in November of 1979 in J
They evacuated a total of 250,000 residents of
.hiississauga, Canada.
whom only 3,000 utilized designated relocation centers - representing caly 1.2% of the population.
Taking into account the specific problems of the IRS, we denberately routed only those zones situated along the perimeter of the ten mile radius to the Holtsvine complex. Th'e reasoning for this Should an incident occur, the evacuation sequence is relatively obvious.
would be to remove residents in the 0-2 mile radius first, fonowed by Since we have those residing in the 3-5 mile radius, if necessary.
already discu,ssed the probability of an evacuation out to ten miles the unly scenario in which the IRS rould be involved - it is evident that the likelihood of such an event occurring is practicany non-existant, as is the subsequent use of the IRS. "Therefore, we have routed only.those.
zones with the least potential for evacuating, to the IRS facilitf.
In addition, those zcues are among the' lowest in population density.
Based on historical wind direction figures, and identifying the zoties corresponding with those directions, a realistic figure in terms of the
= umber of evacuees the IRS could expect to receiv,e and accommodate is thirteen-hundred (1,300) persons.
Irom our professional perspective, the most desirable I
characteristic the IRS facility ' possesses is its logistica11ocation in terms of. compatibility with existing vehicle routing assignments out of The IRS offers the the ten mile Emergency Planning Zone (EFZ).
advantage of excellent' accessibnity since it is serviced by three County roads and one State highway, an of which are capable of accommodating a minimum of 1,800 vehicles per hour.
The Holtsvine complex offers similar advantages in terms of bus We are in the position of having to provide bus service ta those service.
individuals who do not own, or have access to, private..utomobiles.
e e
SD G
e
3tr. Thomas J. Laycock June 12,1080 Unfortunately, bu'ses represent a severely limited resource and as such our plan must be designed to insure their availability to conduct multiple trips. As with the other relocation centers at Stony Brook University and Suffolk Community College, the IRS is strategically located so that it is far enough to provide adequate sheltering, but is close enough to permit maximum utilization of buses.
We are by no means singling out the IRS. A number of alternate locations have been considered but none offer *.he advantages the IRS facility does. The majority of alternate centers have poor accessibility, e
rendering the buildings useless if we can't get people to them. The remaining possibilities are located twenty miles or more from the plant. This is simply too distant as far as providing bus service and adequate police control of vehicle routing.
We realize the reservations you have in permitting the use of your facility during such a County emergency, and your public affairs office has patiently explained your rationale. However in the interest of the people of Suffolk County, whom we represcrit, we feel compelled to ' pursue this issue to the furthest extent possible and ask that you recs nsider your decision in this matter.
If you have any cluestions or wish further information pertaining to the items discussed, please contact this office.
Very truly yours, Richard A. Strang Deputy Commissioner RAS:LP:dh ed: Mr. Jerome Kuntz, Commissioner Internal Revenue Service Mrc Michael Blumenthal, Secretary Department of the Treasury l
4 e
s
E h "Docur,w.iutten :
g 5,1980 - cr.rli Db in +bHsvidle, CRd:hc, AT:uis @ce.,h McGemid) e@s'rg plan,,oskdrg -19eir caej.6W.'Ur, h relooxh@ h
% (s,1980
.7ES refurns call wUligress t ptvficip:tk
% 15,19e0 Das calls -fo H:scdd c$> chfttA. chechirg u.tcfA. &%
May t.5, leeo rm=i ulchR. Des do ct&"n im:Hers in den:dl dme 6,199o - IRS %n! chch'en i.no e
bdure 12,isso - (eg:r t The: mets Iapb_ ;4;ulir3 our p:si-tien orvi osidrg 4Aem -C ttcartsickr July T, isso irs ca.!!s-fo g our lellerjuse recu:ha:1 Mr. In
-b1 oSenttirrt Auyst 25,19eo -
ca.tl Ins t irquae as b sicxtus of ou.e requrst-b y 28,19ec -
receive, reapernee. fhnn Mr. lor _~_k ihchio:tig feir p:sihirri s still no, cte:S Tewm CJc"bu hio. a Q& FtDacrY) b cepk:mber 8,Iseo - verisoed capg of Che6_ k. 3
@l@ 4..ber zi,Ieeo - centsperdence. -s ch16e.$rc:$ era.\\ @
~
~~
Wm October 28, t.9eo - reshe, % FEMA hmber IT,19eo - rempovse [nrrn Ob:le.
Mo.hch 30,1980 - submiWci leMer -fo Lee, bppdeman, S.C.'Planntr3'D:pt efcth'r3. his ef 222.5 puM"It - ard. oskig re his p
m', m.
i 0
i I'
'l i
ti 1
,i i
!! i i
i i !
li!
llfij!ilgjj;,i
,.,I g
..q
.ca jj!!ij'qn;i;i!i>l;;4jh 6
- F=s ill:inliqjilial'
,i, tilr l;i iiL ll IIjs!hililill ri e o-li la'g~ a*
. ms t
iS ii I
- t
. p e
s${
3 m
,i% z...,YI
- ~
LI l
p il{
I * [EEEL_.
!.;;Lj 3; ({l,, gi gjj gj:;;
a
. b.
=,
i j
lil1di D
=}
m ;; >1 i{!
1 e"N l
l l[jilj[ I!I ;I I I,t '!!!'IU 8
I<I}I'hIh!!l!'Ili'jfN
{k N __
e Il I,
e h
r e!(; jigM, a;;;;g:;j4 in ii,ii
.11 t $
3 y gl
,\\
I.s!Ilh..!.lh. ja!!!
Ifhii I
!..!!!e!!ilu{ill
=
dilljf P..
l!
5:ul!I IIII if il l
S!ji! i t i ai til eI'!I's P:e!H ed '"
!Il A!'illl!il cNilllIl 111=!!
li 1-
=
-w
i j
s
/
- p _ M F<
.e r
r;~r,.,
.. IQ mu.
~
Internal Revenus Service date: September 8, 1980 to: Ms. Laura Palmer As you requested, we are forwarding you a copy of The Department of Treasury, "Emer.gency Planning Circular No.
3".
Please accept our apology for the quality of the attached.
It was photocopied from our only copy which also is of poor quality.
Sincerely',
/
John J. Hassett Chief, Security Standards l
3
& Evaluation Branch l
North-Atlantic Region l
m O
S 1
4
)
%9
.m.
W:
THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY V=-<
WASHINGTON. O C. 20220 i
I Emergency Planning Circular No. 3 (Revised) i l
i April 18, 1973 i
I To Heads of Bureaus and Offices in the Office of the Secretary Treasury Department
Subject:
Tamily Protection Assistance to Perscenel with Emergency Executive Team Assignments 1.
Puroese This circular provides policy and guidance
- on the nature of assistance to be usde available to personnel having emergency executive team assign:nents to assure continuity of goverrunent in the event of a national emergency, including an attack on the United States.
2.
Rescission Emergency Planning Circular No. 3 (Revised), dated January 20, 1970,is hereby rescinded.
3.
Eackground Treasury Emergency Planning Circular No.1 (Revised), dated I
February 20, 1973, provides guidance concerning no:nilitary defense actions in response to official instructions for i=p1==enting incr.asad readinass lavais in an escalating amarp :y sir..wcion.
Emergency Planning Circular No. 2 (Revised), dated March 14, 1973, provides guidance for the assignment of personnel to emergency executive tes=s to assure continuity cf govertment in the event of a national emergency by canning assigned emergency operating centers a'nd relocation sites vr.en directed by the Secretary to do so, in
.accordance with Emergency Planning Circular No. I and OIP Circular No. 9610.lC.
An essential element in energency planning fer continuity of government 2.s the ti= ly manning of emergency operating centers q _ = _
- = :-s k
L
.]
2-by key officials and staff assistants, on short notice, when so directed by the Secretary prior to an attack. The successful execution of these plans requires that all foreseeable obstacles to the availability of asergency staff aanbers at their assigned emergency duty stations and all foreseeable impediments to their ability to concentrate on their assigned duties be removed insofar as practicable. The natural concern for the care of dependents, in the absence of satisfactory plans for their protection, could constitute a major deterrent to effective staffing of emergency operating centers.
V 4.
Policy CEP Circular 9130.2 states that, while it is primarily,the responsibility of each individual who has accepted an emergency assignment to make arrangements for the care of* his own dependents, it is in the national interest for departments and agencies to guide and assist members of their emergency staffs in making satisfactory arrangements for the care of their dependents in an emergency.
In accordance with this policy, and in order to ensure that personnci vich e=ergency assignments vill not be prevented from carrying out those assignments by concern for their dependents, the following measures shall be taken by bureaus and offices concerned, as appropriate:
a.
Provide, as needed and fea'sible, emergency housing facili-ties at a desigr.ated location for dependents where coanunication can be established between relocated employees and members of their families." Such housing facilities may be located in 'erivate school or college buildings, hotels, or other public or private buildings
_or residences. A t tacnment No. L provides additional euidance and
_ a sa=ple 'Mm=orandum of Unders tanding."
b.
Provide, where appropriste, for the emergency assignment
'of an employee to relocate, when directed by. the Secretary in accordante with the provisions of Snergency Planning Circular No,1 (Revised), to thJ college or other ' emergency housing facility to serve as coordinator netween the owner of the. facility and the dependents of Treasury personnel for whom housing is provided.
Att chnent No. 2 provides additional guidance.
c.
Provide for advance payment: had evacuation (regular salary) payments to help the employee defray
- the immediate expenses C" mum
)
I
... L y z. ~
3 incident to his relocation or the relocation of his dependents as authorized under Treasury Department Accounting Policy Circular No. 18.
d.
Provide for the allowance of travel and subsistence expenses for members of relocation cadres and their dependents.
~
Permit relocatees to authorize allotments for dependents e.
and for other purposes as authorized in Treasury Department Account-ing Policy Circulars No.11 and 15.
f.
with local or State civil defense authorities for movement of dependents in the general area of the relocation site or else-whare.
h Provide for the care of dependents or relocatees within the emergency operating facilities vnere snace is available and
~
vbere ents v111 not procase security.
inter:ere vien energency operations, or com-5.
Responsibilftv In the Washington, D. C. area, the Mobilization Planning a.
Staff is responsible for locating emergency housing facilities for dependents of e=:ployees of bureaus and offices having emergency i
assigments, prescribing the procedure for the assignment of such
{
facilities to e=:ployees, and establishing and maintaining arrange-l ments for emergency assignments of energency Tamily Housing Coordinators for such facilities.
Bureau Emergency Planning l
Officers and emergency planning representatives of offices in the Office of the Secretary shall provide ast.1 stance to the Mobiliza i
for emergency family housing assig.nents.cuchorised by t t
la r.
b.
Bureau Heads are ' responsible for advising appropriate 1
field ofiices of the assistance to be provided employees having i
energency executive team assignment =,
of this and related circulars, and for establishing procedures toconsistent with th i
assure that such assistance is,provided as outlined in this circular.
g
, ~_ _
-W I
o
=.
t
O Bureau Emergency Planning Officers, energency planning c.
representatives of offices in the Office of the Secretary, and personnel responsible for energency planning in appropriate field offices, are responsible for maintaining a current listing of their personnel having energency assignments, showing whether.or not family housing assistance has been requested and, if so, the ntsnber of male, female and total dependents of each executive team member requesting emergency family housing.
6.
General P evisions Dependents of personnel having emergency executive team a.
assignments may be permitted to proceed to emergency housing facili-ties when directed by the Secretary, in accordance with provisions of E:nergency Planning Circular. No.1.
b.
When movement of dependents to emergency housing facili-ties is directed by the Secretary, the advance and evacuation payments and allotments referred to in Section 4 above may be made.
Authorizing doctanents for emergency pa*yments, allowances c.
and allocnents include Of fice of Emergency Preparedness Circular 9130.2, 5 U.S.C. 5521-5527, civil Service Regulations 5,50.401-407 and Treasury Accounting Policy Circulars No.11 and 18.
d.
The payment of expenses for accournodations for dependents at emergency housing facilities (lodging and meals) and for travel to such facility vill be the person:1 responsibility of the employee whose dependents utili:e such facilities. Personnel having emergency assignments should be so advised. Attachment No. 3 provides guidance for advice to empicyees concerning available emergency family housing essista' nce, the e=ployce's finar.cial responsibility, and the request by the e=ployee for such housing assistance.
Where feasible, to avoid duplication of effort, field offices a.
of several bureaus located in the same crea cre encouraged to coordi-nate arrangements for t!!e joint location and use of emergency family housing facilities.
1 A4T GdA4::"__.
J. Elton Greenlee Deputy As/.stant Secretary for Ad=inistration 4
At schments - 3 my ---
-+
l UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD
//
u i:
)
In the Matter of
)
)
LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY
)
Docket No. 50-322 (0.L.)
)
Shoreham Nuclear Power Stations,
)
Unit 1)
)
)
)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of " RESPONSE OF STATE OF NEW YORK TO SUFFOLK COUNTY'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF EMERGENCY PLANNING DOCUMENTS" dated May 11, 1982, have been served to the following on June 24, 1982 by U.S. Mail, first class, except as otherwise noted.
Lawrence Brenner, Esq.
Ralph Shapiro, Esq.
Administrative Judge Cammer and Shapiro Atomic Safety and Licensing Board 9 East 40th Street U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission New-York, New York 10016 Washington D.C.
20555 Dr. James L.
Carpenter W. Taylor Reveley III, Esq.
Administrative Judge Hunton & Williams l
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board P.O. Box 1535
==-- -
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Richmond, Virginia 23212 l
Washington, D.C.
20555 Edward M. Barrett, Esq.
Stephen B. Latham, Esq.
General Counsel Twomey, Latham & Shea i
l Long Island Lighting Company Attorneys at Law 250 Old Country Road P.O.
Box 398 Mineola, New York 11501 33 West Second Street Riverhead, NY 11901 Mr. Brian McCaffrey Marc W. Goldsmith l
Long Island Lighting Company Energy Research Group, Inc.
175 East Old Country Road 400-1 Totten' Pond Road Hicksville, NY 11801 Waltham, Massachusetts 02154 l
{
1
d Certificate of Service.
David H. Gibnartin, Esq.
MHB Technical Associates Suffolk County Attorney 1723 Hamilton Avenue County Executive / Legislative Blde Suite K Veterans Memorial Highway San Jose, California 95125 Hauppauge, New York 11788 Atomic Safety and Licensing Hon. Peter Cohalan Suffolk County Executive Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission County Executive / Legislative l
Washington, D.C.
20555 Building Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, New York 11788 Docketing and Service Section Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board Office of the Secretary U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commissic U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Whshington, D.C.
20555 Washington, D.C. 20555 Bernard M.
Bordenick, Esq.
- Christopher M. McMurray Kirkpatrick, Lockhart, Hill, David A. Repka, Esq.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Christopher & Phillips Washington, D.C. 20555 1900 M Street, N'W.,
8th Floor Washington, D.C. 20036 4
y-H1(TTH f
LY l
L s
~
Matthew J. Kelly, Esq.
Staff Counsel, New York State
- By Expre'ss Mail Public Service Commission 3 Empire State Plaza Albany, NY 12223
E' 7
Attachment No.1 EPC No. 3 (Rev.)
GUIDELINTS FOR ARRANCING D4ERGENCY TAMILY HOUSING TACILITIES 1.
In attempting to locate family housing facilities, colleges and private schools should be contacted first because:
a.
They have good facilities for housing.
b.
They have racilities for feeding.
c.
In many cases titey plan to send their students home in event of a serious emergency.
d.
They are less likely to insist on advance financial arrange-ments,and deposits.
a.
Rotels and motels are likely to be filled.up by refugees in event of any mass evacuation or panic, and the likelihood of having them reserve facilities in advance for Treasury person-nel would not seem promising.
i f.
There is probably less possibility of the college president l
passing on information or starting rumors than in the case of proprietors of hotels and motels or och,er business facilities.
l 2.
Care should be exercised to avoid creating alarm or starting rumors of impending emerge'acy while contacting officials of potential housing facilities. Contacts for initial discussions should be limited to the head of the college, school or other institution, and he should be requested to restrict the knowledge of any arrangements made to the minimum number of his personnel for whom the information would be nec es sary. The request for facilities should be based on the need to arrange for the care of families of Treasury personnel who would be ordered to meve to emergency offices in the event of a possible a ttack.
~
3.
Facilities should be sought in areas regarded as relatively safe from blast and should have av,ailable fallout shelter.
l 4
The informal agreement with the college or other institution may j
be evidenced *oy a Memcrandum of Understanding similar to the follow-I ing sample:
MD(ORANDLE. OF UNDERSTANDING In the event of an emergency situation requiring the dispersal
~
of certain persons.
will provide lodging and meals for approximately dependents of Treasury Q -
x_
_. m. 4
__