ML20054H947
| ML20054H947 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 06/01/1982 |
| From: | Barnes I, Mcneill W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20054H944 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900217 NUDOCS 8206250241 | |
| Download: ML20054H947 (7) | |
Text
ORGANIZATION:
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS DIVISION HUNT VALLEY, MARYLAND REPORT INSPECTION INSPECTION NO.:
99900217/82-01 DATE(S) 4/19-22/82 ON-SITE HOURS: 24 CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS: Westinghouse Electric Corporation Electrical Systems Division ATTN:
Mr. J. F. Heins, General Manager 1111 Schilling Road Hunt Valley, Maryland 21031 ORGANIZATIONAL CONTACT:
Mr. R. W. Lee, Product Assurance Manager TELEPHONE NUMBER:
(301) 667-5532 PRINCIPAL PRODUCT: Electronic components and controls NUCLEAR INDUSTRY ACTIVITY: About 75% of the manufacturing is commercial auclear work.
The product lines include Solid State Protet: ion Systems, Nuclear Instrumentation Systems, Digital Rod Position Indication Systems, Reactor and Containment Vessel Level Monitoring Systems, and Technical Support Centers.
b.
0 //[#?-
ASSIGNED INSPECTOR:
W. M. McNeill, Reactive & Components Programs Da'te Section (R& CPS)
OTHER INSPECTOR (S):
4///d2-APPROVED BY:
W I. Barnes, Chief, R& CPS Date i
l l
INSPECTION BASES AND SCOPE:
A.
BASES:
B.
SCOPE:
Manufacturing process control, control of special processes, audits, and status of previous inspection findings.
PLANT SITE APPLICABILITY:
8 Not Identified.
I 8206250241 820608 PDR GA999 ENVWEST 99900217 PDR
ORGANIZATION: WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS DIVISION HUNT VALLEY, MARYLAND REPORT INSPECTION NO.:
99900217/82-01 RESULTS:
a PAGE 2 of 4 A.
VIOLATIONS:
None B.
NONCONFORMANCES:
f 1.
Contrary to Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50, and section 9.0 of the Product Assurance Manual, no Quality Assurance Procefere was established which addresses the cualification of the wire wrap process and personnel.
2.
Contrary to Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and section 2.1 of Quality Assurance Procedure (QAP) 10.2, one of two operators performing Termi point wiring on April 20, 1992, of a cabinet assembly 106E58G02, SN 0002, was found not to be certified in accordance with the procedure.
No records could be found to demonstrate that the required training and testing had been accomplished.
3.
Contrary to Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and section 2.2.1 of QAP 13.3, although wire wrap was observed in the PC Board area on several boards, the applicable Process Specification (PS 82355 HA) was not maintained at the Inspection Station. The speci-fication identified the acceptance criteria to be used by inspection.
4.
Contrary to Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and section 3.1.1.1.(9) of QAP 14.6, Requests for Engineering Action (REA's) 342565 and 342566, were observed on serialized equipment which did not have the assigned serial numbers entered on the REA's.
5.
Contrary to Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and section 2 l
of QAP 14.1, the procedure was found to be not fully implemented in that:
i l
a.
The requirements of paragraph 3.1.1.3.13 of the procedure, per-taining to updating of tags, was not accomplished for Job No.
10477, part 1064E03, as of April 21, 1982, to reflect change order RN3088, which had been issued on March 23, 1982.
b.
Recording of all operators signaturec and dates, which is a requirement of paragraph 3.2.1.1. of the procedure, was not I
accomplished on the tags for parts 1063E43G41, SN0001, and l
1063E43G39, SN0001, for Job No. 10477.
l 1
ORGANIZATION:
WESTINGHCUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS DIVISION HUNT VALLEY, MARYLAND REPORT INSPECTION N0.-
93900217/82-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 3 of 4 c.
Shortages (i.e., missing serial number stamping and missing brackets, and three power supplies) were not identified on the tag, as required by paragraph 3.2.1.4 of the procedure, for part 1063E43G39, SN0001 for Job No. 10477.
d.
A Defective Article Report (DAR) number was not entered on the tags for part 6090072G01, SN0005 for Job No. 10531, although required by paragraph 3.3.1.6.1 of the procedure.
It was also noted that two nonapplicable REA's had been recorded on the tags.
C.
UNRESOLVED ITEMS None D.
STATUS OF PREVIOUS INSPECTION FINDINGS:
1.
(Closed) Nonconformance (81-02):
Two Inspection Control Tags were found with incorrect and missing information.
The inspector verified that the tags in question had been corrected and the departmental meetings were held as a preventive measure.
This area was reinspected during this inspection and a nonconformance identified (see B.5).
2.
(Closed) Nonconformance (81-02):
Two Corrective Action Requests (CARS) for vendor nonconformances were either not initiated or were voided.
A review of current MRB activities found no further problems in this area.
The corrective action on the previous problems was implemented and an audit of the vendor is underway.
3.
(Closed) Nonconformance (81-02):
Three cases were found where defects were not logged or were logged incorrectly.
An inspection of current Inspection Submittal and Discrepancy Records and nonconforming hardware found all defects properly logged.
Training sessions had been held on this problem.
4.
(Closed) Nonconformance (81-02):
Independent verification of vendor test results has not been performed for the last 4 months.
A review of the receiving inspection test report log found the procedure in question to be implemented.
Internal memos were issued to implement the pro-cedure requirements for independent verification.
ORGANIZATION:
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS DIVISION HUNT VALLEY, MARYLAND REPORT INSPECTION NO.:
99900217/82-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 4 of 4 E.
OTHER FINDINGS OR COMMENTS:
1.
Manufacturing Process Control - The Inspection Control Tag procedure was reviewed and its implementation inspected.
A sample of six parts and thei associated tags were inspected in the PC board and wire assembly areas.
In this area nonconformances B.4 and B.5 were identified.
In regard to nonconformance B.4 it was noted that engineering had a date entered on the REA where a serial number should have been entered.
In regard to nonconformance 8.5 it was noted that the inspection of these units had had yet to be performed.
Inspection is to identify the missing information RN, DAR, operator's signatures, shortages, etc.
2.
Control of Special Processes - An inspection was performed of the various processes used at ESD - Hunt Valley.
There were only three processes which required qualification of the process and/or personnel.
Soldering, Termi point, and wire wrap wiring were treateil as special processes.
A sister division at the same site, Integrated Logistic Support Division (ILSD), performed the qualification of personnel except Termi point.
The qualifications of eight operators were inspected.
In this area nonconformances B.1 thru B.3 were identified.
In regard to noncon-formance B.1 it was noted that ESD - Hunt Valley had qualification procedures for soldering and Termi point, however there was no s
procedure on wire wrap.
ILSD followed its own procedure to qualify the personnel.
In regard to nonconformance B.3 it was noted that the specification in question was added to the file during the inspection.
3.
Audits - The 1982 audit schedule was reviewed.
The audit plans and checklists used for three recent audits were inspected.
The reporting of results and follow up on findings were verified to follow established procedures.
The training of three auditors used for the above sample was inspected.
No nonconformances were identified in this area.
l c
PER50f45 CONTACTED Company CSTio6Hodit ber#T Dates b
Docket / Report No. 99[#d2/7 k'8 Inspector If /$lf Page I of 3
NAME(Please Print)
TITLE (Please Print)
ORGANIZATION (Please Print)
'l60 Lee l'idovaw Assume.c A44 (a) >
ja,1 l h o I w /
G e,.
I Ah" Am lha Ad L&
l.
khu I 66 cm s.
I.
I2 DU l, elm;o,b.I 1
Fhw l h' O
l I
~
6 % E 6 L I cs V h I
I 2 R LA I
A m /APR I
l
' A Gall
/D K C l
l l
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
l
~
J,
M!
T R
i b
5
%j' '9 i
0 1
\\
dit I
C
\\
l 2
w
~
\\ <
g mi
\\ < k g
}
I I
I
-9d
- s 8:
7:
% ~E kNRhgd
$$Ii 5EE.
M P} Q @k M E Cyr 4 'Mp; iliil e
Ecc-
~
~-
~~.
pSM A a
zaau i
S,L i
=
I (I
1 J
.b QQ x
,g' g
ct Q
'k v
E y
c 4 N
. Q,,
- L Y'#
l 0
$ - 94
,l -
s e
m
~
N N (p,;.d
,d 5
5 i
1 f
8
. e-3 t.
, i3d I
E
}g!
b a m j
r J1.
m
,hk
. V Yo
?
A Wh:
A Q l 1
elf
'4%
N a
d, e
!. 0 t.
j e-E
.t g
f.@t ~l:
T' s p w? ?
?., lN.':
- :-?
5tst e
s g o Nl ' s b l
S' sits y%
gQ '
i W
(hqW
')2Meh P
seas
^
. =. -
T)
N N
N D N d
b
',5 i
.s t gr=
m k
0 c)l Wg
$5 M
$ @,Q- @Nd d
g m
m ro o
n-e y
)
l 7 ""
C,ENMv d,v><
c.
Q s
E S
i
, "Y ct:r s:r
1; l
7t i' '
j iit r
i.
- g_
e
)e r
l e
b g?
b a
N n
c a
i i
l A S E mnnp tt p
" nI 4
"f D
eeea i
t n n t
n s I
f ii r J ccI o
l oo(
' p 5 1
" e e 7
3 9 ADD 2
n i
"R 1 !r g
tff o a
0 nooi P
o e
s 2
0 r
7" ueei 3
/
s q pt v t
0 c neyae e
3 nSTDP n
e i
h l
S o
C1 234 a
t a
D tAc
$c, A
W P
eT o
it u
A s
D E
/
l T
f, l
6 C,
C i
E N
l.
0 f
X D
f U
S 1
j S
/
g i
E f
L F
E l
l E
T W
E M
)
I y
C A
M U
T r
O l
t as bI D
4 se p
S c
U E en E
f E)6R I
0 y
h #_
ro f
- F lem i
T T
e c
<rl e
d
.. i l
O p
7'L.
l S
S S
sa
(
anr E_M E h rer cet e L
)
O R6 rt th bI E d unet PI LO E
IJ E s
T 5678
~
n o
i 3
s t
e ael 2
3 3
3 p
cra y gi uu T nfl n it ea e-_
L wccH naeo l
erprA r
e G_
mDSPf u
)
l u
o o
t c
t H
I' o
e e
P L
D1 234 c
/
1 p
P A
0 s
o G
n c
I S
.