|
---|
Category:CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS
MONTHYEARML20217L0421999-10-21021 October 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-382/99-20 on 990815-0925 & Notice of Violation.Two Severity Level IV Violations of NRC Requirements Identified & Being Treated as non-cited Violations Consistent with App C of Enforcement Policy ML20217N2111999-10-19019 October 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-382/99-14 on 990913-17 & 1004-08.No Violations Noted.Licensed Operator Requalification Program, Effective,Utilized Systems Approach to Training & Showed Continued Improvements Over Previous Insp Findings ML20217L0101999-10-18018 October 1999 Provides Update of Waterford 3 Effort for Review of Ufsar. Info Listed Includes Background Mgt Expectations,Review Status & Results,Clarifications Re Review & Conclusions ML20217L0141999-10-18018 October 1999 Submits Update to NRC Staff Re Circumstances & Plans for Submitting Certification Rept on Waterford 3 Plant Specific Simulator ML20217G7051999-10-14014 October 1999 Forwards Comments on Four of NRC RO Examination Questions for Exam Administered During Week of 991004 05000382/LER-1999-014, Forwards LER 99-014-00,providing Details of Reactor Shutdown Due to Loss of RCP Controlled bleed-off Flow.Attached Commitment Identification/Voluntary Enhancement Form Identifies All Commitments Contained in Submittal1999-10-12012 October 1999 Forwards LER 99-014-00,providing Details of Reactor Shutdown Due to Loss of RCP Controlled bleed-off Flow.Attached Commitment Identification/Voluntary Enhancement Form Identifies All Commitments Contained in Submittal ML20217D5151999-10-0707 October 1999 Forwards Application for Renewal of SRO License for C Fugate License SOP-43039-3,IAW 10CFR55.57.Without Encls ML20217C6251999-10-0505 October 1999 Informs That NRC Reviewed Util Ltr & Encl Exercise Scenario Package for Waterford 3 Emergency Plan Exercise Scheduled for 991013.Based on Review,Nrc Determined That Exercise Appropriate to Meet Objectives ML20212J6921999-09-29029 September 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-382/99-18 on 990830-0902.One Noncited Violation Identified Re Failure to Follow Procedural Instructions to Ensure That Members on Fire Brigade Shift Were Qualified ML20216G2441999-09-27027 September 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-382/99-19 on 990830-0903.No Violations Noted 05000382/LER-1999-013, Forwards LER 99-013-00,providing Details of Exceeding TS Limits for RCS Cooldown Rates.All Commitments Contained in Submittal Are Identified on Encl Commitment Identification/ Voluntary Enhancement Form1999-09-23023 September 1999 Forwards LER 99-013-00,providing Details of Exceeding TS Limits for RCS Cooldown Rates.All Commitments Contained in Submittal Are Identified on Encl Commitment Identification/ Voluntary Enhancement Form IR 05000382/19993011999-09-21021 September 1999 Informs That NRC License Exam Previously Associated with NRC Insp Rept 50-382/99-301 Will Be Incorporated Into NRC Insp Rept 50-382/99-14 ML20212D8761999-09-16016 September 1999 Informs That on 990818,NRC Staff Completed Midcycle PPR of Waterford 3.During Assessment Period,Number of Personnel Errors Occurred,Which Demonstrated Lack of Attention to Detail by Plant Personnel.Historical Listing of Issues,Encl ML20212C2471999-09-16016 September 1999 Forwards Five Final Applications for RO Licenses for G Esquival,Jm Hearn,Md Lawson,Re Simpson & PI Wood.Written Exam & Operating Test to Be Administered,Is Requested. Encls Withheld ML20212C2391999-09-16016 September 1999 Requests Cancellation of SRO Licenses for Bn Coble,License SOP-43835,due to Job Assignment Location & CA Rodgers, License SOP-43537-1,due to Resignation from Company, Effective 990901 ML20212C5881999-09-14014 September 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-382/99-15 on 990719-23 with Continuing in Ofc Insp Until 0819.No Violations Noted ML20211Q4421999-09-0909 September 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-382/99-07 on 990601-11.Three Violations Being Treated as Noncited Violations ML20211P4121999-09-0707 September 1999 Requests NRC Staff Review & Approval of Integrated Nuclear Security Plan (Insp) & Integrated Security Training & Qualification Plan (Ist&Q), for Use by All Entergy Operations,Inc.Encl Withheld,Per 10CFR2.790(d) ML20211M8391999-09-0303 September 1999 Forwards Revised Epips,Including Rev 25 to EP-001-020,rev 24 to EP-001-030,rev 25 to EP-001-040,rev 30 to EP-002-100,rev 22 to EP-001-010,rev 27 to EP-002-010,rev 26 to EP-002-102 & Rev 16 to EP-002-190.Listed Proprietary Revs to Epips,Encl ML20211L3681999-09-0202 September 1999 Forwards Five Preliminary Applications for Reactor Operator Licenses for Individuals Listed,Iaw 10CFR55.31.Encls Withheld ML20211K9741999-09-0101 September 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-382/99-16 on 990704-0814.Two Severity Level IV Violations Identified & Being Treated as Noncited Violations,Consistent with App C of Enforcement Policy 05000382/LER-1999-011, Forwards LER 99-011-00,providing Details of Reactor Shutdown Due to Loss of Controlled bleed-off Flow.All Commitments Contained in Submittal Identified on Attached Commitment Identification/Voluntary Enhancement Form1999-08-31031 August 1999 Forwards LER 99-011-00,providing Details of Reactor Shutdown Due to Loss of Controlled bleed-off Flow.All Commitments Contained in Submittal Identified on Attached Commitment Identification/Voluntary Enhancement Form ML20211M3641999-08-30030 August 1999 Forwards Written Examination,Operating Tests & Supporting Ref Matl Identified in Attachment 2 of ES-210,in Response to NRC .Encl Withheld ML20211G5751999-08-27027 August 1999 Forwards RAI Re IPEEE Submittal.Please Provide RAI within 60 Days of Receipt of Ltr,Per Util Response to GL 88-20,suppl 4 ML20211E3281999-08-26026 August 1999 Forwards fitness-for-duty Performance Data for Period of 990101-0630,IAW 10CFR26.71(d).Ltr Does Not Contain Commitments 05000382/LER-1999-009, Forwards LER 99-009-00 Re Discovery of Condition of Noncompliance with App R Involving Inadequate Separation of Essential Cables Routed in Fire Area RAB-30 in Rab. Compensatory Measures Were Established Immediately1999-08-26026 August 1999 Forwards LER 99-009-00 Re Discovery of Condition of Noncompliance with App R Involving Inadequate Separation of Essential Cables Routed in Fire Area RAB-30 in Rab. Compensatory Measures Were Established Immediately 05000382/LER-1999-010, Forwards LER 99-010-00,providing Details of Inadequate Pumping Capacity in Dry Cooling Tower Area.All Commitments Contained in Submittal Are Identified on Attached Commitment Identification Voluntary Enhancement Form1999-08-26026 August 1999 Forwards LER 99-010-00,providing Details of Inadequate Pumping Capacity in Dry Cooling Tower Area.All Commitments Contained in Submittal Are Identified on Attached Commitment Identification Voluntary Enhancement Form ML20211F5421999-08-24024 August 1999 Forwards Proposed marked-up TS Page Xviii, Index Administrative Controls, Correcting Page Number Re TS Change Request NPF-38-220.Editorial Changes for TS Change NPF-38-221 Discussed ML20211F3561999-08-24024 August 1999 Forwards CTS Pages & TS Proposed marked-up Pages for Insertion Into TS Change Request NPF-38-207 Re Efas, Originally Submitted on 980702.Original NSHC Determination Continues to Be Applicable ML20211F4611999-08-24024 August 1999 Informs That NRC Reviewed Ltr & Encl Objectives for Waterford 3 Emergency Plan Exercise Scheduled for 991013.Exercise Objectives Appropriate to Meet Emergency Plan Requirements ML20211G1731999-08-23023 August 1999 Informs That Info Submitted in ,B&W Rept 51-1234900-00,will Be Withheld from Public Disclosure,Per 10CFR2.790 ML20211C5101999-08-19019 August 1999 Forwards Certified Copies of Liability Insurance Policy Endorsements Issued in First Half of 1999 for Each Entergy Operations,Inc Nuclear Unit,Per 10CFR140.15 ML20210T9791999-08-18018 August 1999 Discusses Which Responded to Reconsideration of Violation Denial (EA 98-022) Enforcement Action Detailed in .Concludes That Violation Occurred as Stated ML20211A9501999-08-12012 August 1999 Discusses 990720-21 Workshop Conducted in Region IV Ofc,Re Exchange of Info in Area of Use of Risk Insights in Regulatory Activities.List of Attendees,Summary of Topic & Issues,Agenda & Copies of Handouts Encl ML20210S0561999-08-12012 August 1999 Submits Voluntary Response to NRC AL 99-02, Operating Reactor Licensing Action Estimates, for NRC Fys 2000 & 2001 for Waterford 3 ML20210Q6161999-08-12012 August 1999 Forwards Corrected Copy of Monthly Operating Rept for July 1999 for Waterford 3.Original Rept,Submitted with ,Contained Typos ML20217F2661999-08-12012 August 1999 Forwards Copy of 1999 Waterford 3 Biennial Exercise Package to Be Performed Using Waterford 3 CR Simulator ML20210R9231999-08-11011 August 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-382/99-10 on 990719-23.Violations Noted.Nrc Has Determined That One Severity Level IV Violation of NRC Requirements Occurred ML20210L1461999-08-0303 August 1999 Informs That NRC Plans to Administer Gfes of Written Operator Licensing Exam on 991006.Requests Submittal of Ltr Identifying Individuals Taking Exam,Personnel Allowed Access to Exams & Mailing Address for Exams 05000382/LER-1999-008, Forwards LER 99-008-00,re Failure to Perform Testing of ESF Filtration Units Per TS Srs.Commitments Made by Util Also Encl1999-07-29029 July 1999 Forwards LER 99-008-00,re Failure to Perform Testing of ESF Filtration Units Per TS Srs.Commitments Made by Util Also Encl ML20210H4291999-07-29029 July 1999 Forwards Response to NRC Rai,Associated with TS Change Request NPF-38-208,proposing to Replace Ref to Supplement 1 with Ref to Supplement 2 of Calculative Methods for CE Small Break LOCA Evaluation Model, in ACs Section of TSs ML20210F9451999-07-27027 July 1999 Forwards Proprietary & non-proprietary Version of Rev 29 to EPIP EP-002-100, Technical Support Ctr Activation,Operation & Deactivation. Proprietary Info Withheld,Per 10CFR2.790 ML20210D3171999-07-23023 July 1999 Submits Proposal for Final Resolution of Reracking Spent Fuel Pool at Plant,Per License Amend 144,issued by NRC in .No New Commitments Are Contained in Ltr 05000382/LER-1999-007, Forwards LER 99-007-00,providing Details of Operation Outside Tornado Missile Protection Licensing Basis for turbine-driven Emergency Feedwater Pump Exhaust Stack & Steam Supply Piping.All Commitments Identified on Attached1999-07-23023 July 1999 Forwards LER 99-007-00,providing Details of Operation Outside Tornado Missile Protection Licensing Basis for turbine-driven Emergency Feedwater Pump Exhaust Stack & Steam Supply Piping.All Commitments Identified on Attached ML20210D8701999-07-23023 July 1999 Forwards Safety Evaluation Re First 10-yr Interval Inservice Insp Plan Requests for Relief ISI-018 Through ISI-020 for Entergy Operations,Inc,Unit 3 ML20210B1521999-07-15015 July 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-382/99-13 on 990523-0703.Three Violations Being Treated as Noncited Violations ML20209G9771999-07-13013 July 1999 Forwards Objectives & Guidelines for Waterford 3 Emergency Preparedness Exercise Scheduled for 991013.List of Objectives cross-referenced Where Applicable to Relevant Sections of NUREG-0654 IR 05000382/19990081999-07-12012 July 1999 Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-382/99-08 Issued on 990503 ML20209E5231999-07-0909 July 1999 Informs That as Result of NRC Review of Util Responses to GL-92-01,rev 1 & Suppl 1,staff Revised Info in Reactor Vessel Integrity Database & Releasing Database as Rvid Version 2.This Closes Staff Efforts Re TAC MA0583 ML20209D4051999-07-0707 July 1999 Forwards Revised TS Pages to Replace Attachment C,Entirely in Original TS Change Request NPF-38-207,per 990519 Discussion with C Patel of Nrc.Changes to Action 20 Delete Word Requirement & Revise Word Modes to Mode 1999-09-09
[Table view] Category:INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE
MONTHYEARML20217L0101999-10-18018 October 1999 Provides Update of Waterford 3 Effort for Review of Ufsar. Info Listed Includes Background Mgt Expectations,Review Status & Results,Clarifications Re Review & Conclusions ML20217L0141999-10-18018 October 1999 Submits Update to NRC Staff Re Circumstances & Plans for Submitting Certification Rept on Waterford 3 Plant Specific Simulator ML20217G7051999-10-14014 October 1999 Forwards Comments on Four of NRC RO Examination Questions for Exam Administered During Week of 991004 05000382/LER-1999-014, Forwards LER 99-014-00,providing Details of Reactor Shutdown Due to Loss of RCP Controlled bleed-off Flow.Attached Commitment Identification/Voluntary Enhancement Form Identifies All Commitments Contained in Submittal1999-10-12012 October 1999 Forwards LER 99-014-00,providing Details of Reactor Shutdown Due to Loss of RCP Controlled bleed-off Flow.Attached Commitment Identification/Voluntary Enhancement Form Identifies All Commitments Contained in Submittal ML20217D5151999-10-0707 October 1999 Forwards Application for Renewal of SRO License for C Fugate License SOP-43039-3,IAW 10CFR55.57.Without Encls 05000382/LER-1999-013, Forwards LER 99-013-00,providing Details of Exceeding TS Limits for RCS Cooldown Rates.All Commitments Contained in Submittal Are Identified on Encl Commitment Identification/ Voluntary Enhancement Form1999-09-23023 September 1999 Forwards LER 99-013-00,providing Details of Exceeding TS Limits for RCS Cooldown Rates.All Commitments Contained in Submittal Are Identified on Encl Commitment Identification/ Voluntary Enhancement Form ML20212C2391999-09-16016 September 1999 Requests Cancellation of SRO Licenses for Bn Coble,License SOP-43835,due to Job Assignment Location & CA Rodgers, License SOP-43537-1,due to Resignation from Company, Effective 990901 ML20212C2471999-09-16016 September 1999 Forwards Five Final Applications for RO Licenses for G Esquival,Jm Hearn,Md Lawson,Re Simpson & PI Wood.Written Exam & Operating Test to Be Administered,Is Requested. Encls Withheld ML20211P4121999-09-0707 September 1999 Requests NRC Staff Review & Approval of Integrated Nuclear Security Plan (Insp) & Integrated Security Training & Qualification Plan (Ist&Q), for Use by All Entergy Operations,Inc.Encl Withheld,Per 10CFR2.790(d) ML20211M8391999-09-0303 September 1999 Forwards Revised Epips,Including Rev 25 to EP-001-020,rev 24 to EP-001-030,rev 25 to EP-001-040,rev 30 to EP-002-100,rev 22 to EP-001-010,rev 27 to EP-002-010,rev 26 to EP-002-102 & Rev 16 to EP-002-190.Listed Proprietary Revs to Epips,Encl ML20211L3681999-09-0202 September 1999 Forwards Five Preliminary Applications for Reactor Operator Licenses for Individuals Listed,Iaw 10CFR55.31.Encls Withheld 05000382/LER-1999-011, Forwards LER 99-011-00,providing Details of Reactor Shutdown Due to Loss of Controlled bleed-off Flow.All Commitments Contained in Submittal Identified on Attached Commitment Identification/Voluntary Enhancement Form1999-08-31031 August 1999 Forwards LER 99-011-00,providing Details of Reactor Shutdown Due to Loss of Controlled bleed-off Flow.All Commitments Contained in Submittal Identified on Attached Commitment Identification/Voluntary Enhancement Form ML20211M3641999-08-30030 August 1999 Forwards Written Examination,Operating Tests & Supporting Ref Matl Identified in Attachment 2 of ES-210,in Response to NRC .Encl Withheld ML20211E3281999-08-26026 August 1999 Forwards fitness-for-duty Performance Data for Period of 990101-0630,IAW 10CFR26.71(d).Ltr Does Not Contain Commitments 05000382/LER-1999-010, Forwards LER 99-010-00,providing Details of Inadequate Pumping Capacity in Dry Cooling Tower Area.All Commitments Contained in Submittal Are Identified on Attached Commitment Identification Voluntary Enhancement Form1999-08-26026 August 1999 Forwards LER 99-010-00,providing Details of Inadequate Pumping Capacity in Dry Cooling Tower Area.All Commitments Contained in Submittal Are Identified on Attached Commitment Identification Voluntary Enhancement Form 05000382/LER-1999-009, Forwards LER 99-009-00 Re Discovery of Condition of Noncompliance with App R Involving Inadequate Separation of Essential Cables Routed in Fire Area RAB-30 in Rab. Compensatory Measures Were Established Immediately1999-08-26026 August 1999 Forwards LER 99-009-00 Re Discovery of Condition of Noncompliance with App R Involving Inadequate Separation of Essential Cables Routed in Fire Area RAB-30 in Rab. Compensatory Measures Were Established Immediately ML20211F3561999-08-24024 August 1999 Forwards CTS Pages & TS Proposed marked-up Pages for Insertion Into TS Change Request NPF-38-207 Re Efas, Originally Submitted on 980702.Original NSHC Determination Continues to Be Applicable ML20211F5421999-08-24024 August 1999 Forwards Proposed marked-up TS Page Xviii, Index Administrative Controls, Correcting Page Number Re TS Change Request NPF-38-220.Editorial Changes for TS Change NPF-38-221 Discussed ML20211C5101999-08-19019 August 1999 Forwards Certified Copies of Liability Insurance Policy Endorsements Issued in First Half of 1999 for Each Entergy Operations,Inc Nuclear Unit,Per 10CFR140.15 ML20210Q6161999-08-12012 August 1999 Forwards Corrected Copy of Monthly Operating Rept for July 1999 for Waterford 3.Original Rept,Submitted with ,Contained Typos ML20210S0561999-08-12012 August 1999 Submits Voluntary Response to NRC AL 99-02, Operating Reactor Licensing Action Estimates, for NRC Fys 2000 & 2001 for Waterford 3 ML20217F2661999-08-12012 August 1999 Forwards Copy of 1999 Waterford 3 Biennial Exercise Package to Be Performed Using Waterford 3 CR Simulator 05000382/LER-1999-008, Forwards LER 99-008-00,re Failure to Perform Testing of ESF Filtration Units Per TS Srs.Commitments Made by Util Also Encl1999-07-29029 July 1999 Forwards LER 99-008-00,re Failure to Perform Testing of ESF Filtration Units Per TS Srs.Commitments Made by Util Also Encl ML20210H4291999-07-29029 July 1999 Forwards Response to NRC Rai,Associated with TS Change Request NPF-38-208,proposing to Replace Ref to Supplement 1 with Ref to Supplement 2 of Calculative Methods for CE Small Break LOCA Evaluation Model, in ACs Section of TSs ML20210F9451999-07-27027 July 1999 Forwards Proprietary & non-proprietary Version of Rev 29 to EPIP EP-002-100, Technical Support Ctr Activation,Operation & Deactivation. Proprietary Info Withheld,Per 10CFR2.790 ML20210D3171999-07-23023 July 1999 Submits Proposal for Final Resolution of Reracking Spent Fuel Pool at Plant,Per License Amend 144,issued by NRC in .No New Commitments Are Contained in Ltr 05000382/LER-1999-007, Forwards LER 99-007-00,providing Details of Operation Outside Tornado Missile Protection Licensing Basis for turbine-driven Emergency Feedwater Pump Exhaust Stack & Steam Supply Piping.All Commitments Identified on Attached1999-07-23023 July 1999 Forwards LER 99-007-00,providing Details of Operation Outside Tornado Missile Protection Licensing Basis for turbine-driven Emergency Feedwater Pump Exhaust Stack & Steam Supply Piping.All Commitments Identified on Attached ML20209G9771999-07-13013 July 1999 Forwards Objectives & Guidelines for Waterford 3 Emergency Preparedness Exercise Scheduled for 991013.List of Objectives cross-referenced Where Applicable to Relevant Sections of NUREG-0654 ML20209D4051999-07-0707 July 1999 Forwards Revised TS Pages to Replace Attachment C,Entirely in Original TS Change Request NPF-38-207,per 990519 Discussion with C Patel of Nrc.Changes to Action 20 Delete Word Requirement & Revise Word Modes to Mode ML20209B6081999-06-30030 June 1999 Submits Response to NRC GL 98-01,Suppl 1, Y2K Readiness of Computer Sys at Nuclear Power Plants. Disclosure Encl 05000382/LER-1999-005, Forwards LER 99-005-00,providing Details of Discovery of Untested Electrical Contacts in safety-related Logic Circuits1999-06-24024 June 1999 Forwards LER 99-005-00,providing Details of Discovery of Untested Electrical Contacts in safety-related Logic Circuits ML20196G5731999-06-24024 June 1999 Forwards Operator Licensing Exam Outlines Associated with Exam Scheduled for Wk of 991004.Exam Development Is Being Performed in Accordance with NUREG-1021,Rev 8 ML20212J4121999-06-23023 June 1999 Responds to NRC Re Reconsideration of EA 98-022. Details Provided on Actions Util Has Taken or Plans to Take to Address NRC Concerns with Ability to Demonstrate Adequate Flow Availability to Meet Design Requirements ML20196E9371999-06-22022 June 1999 Forwards Revs Made to EP Training Procedures.Procedures NTC-217 & NTC-217 Have Been Deleted.Procedure NTP-203 Was Revised to Combine Requirement Previously Included in Procedures NRC-216 & NTC-217 ML20196A1021999-06-17017 June 1999 Provides Supplemental Response to GL 95-07, Pressure Locking & Thermal Binding of Safety-Related Power-Operated Gate Valves, Per 990513 Request of NRC Project Manager ML20195F3671999-06-0909 June 1999 Forwards Rev 21,Change 0 to EP-001-010, Unusual Event. Rev Reviewed in Accordance with 10CFR50.54(q) Requirements & Determined Not to Decrease Effectiveness of Emergency Plan ML20195C7801999-06-0303 June 1999 Submits Response to Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-382/99-08.Corrective Actions:All Licensee Access Authorization Personnel Were Retrained Prior to Completion of Insp ML20195C2951999-05-28028 May 1999 Forwards Annual Evaluation of Changes & Errors Identified in Abb CE ECCS Performance Evaluation Models Used for LOCA Analyses.Results of Annual Evaluation for CY98 Detailed in Attached Rept,Based Upon Suppl 10 to Abb CE Rept ML20195C0241999-05-28028 May 1999 Notifies NRC of Operator Medical Condition for Waterford 3 Opertaor Sp Wolfe,License SOP-43723.Attached NRC Form & Memo Contain Info Concerning Condition.Without Encls ML20196L3281999-05-24024 May 1999 Informs That Entergy Is Withdrawing TS Change Request NPF-38-205 Re TS 3.3.3.7.1, Chlorine Detection Sys & TS 3.3.3.7.3, Broad Range Gas Detection Submitted on 980629 ML20206S4691999-05-17017 May 1999 Requests Waiver of Exam for SRO Licenses for an Vest & Hj Lewis,Iaw 10CFR55.47.Both Individuals Have Held Licenses at Plant within Past Two Year Period,But Licenses Expired Upon Leaving Util Employment.Encl Withheld 05000382/LER-1999-004, Forwards LER 99-004-00 Re Discovery That Response Time Testing Had Not Been Performed for ESFAS Containment Cooling Function,As Required by TS SR 4.3.2.31999-05-14014 May 1999 Forwards LER 99-004-00 Re Discovery That Response Time Testing Had Not Been Performed for ESFAS Containment Cooling Function,As Required by TS SR 4.3.2.3 ML20206N1921999-05-10010 May 1999 Provides Revised Attachment 2 for Alternative Request IWE-02,originally Submitted 990429 Re Bolt Torque or Tension Testing of Class Mc pressure-retaining Bolting as Specified in Item 8.20 of Article IWE-2500,Table IWE-2500-1 ML20206J1471999-05-0606 May 1999 Requests That Implementation Date for TS Change Request NPF-38-211 Be within 90 Days of Approval to Allow for Installation of New Monitoring Sys for Broad Range Gas Detection Sys ML20206J1721999-05-0606 May 1999 Notifies That Proposed Schedule for Plant 1999 Annual Exercise Is Wk of 991013.Exercise Objective Meeting Scheduled for 990513 at St John Baptist Parish Emergency Operations Ctr ML20206G8021999-05-0404 May 1999 Provides Revised Response to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-382/99-01.Licensee Denies Violation as Stated.Change Made Is Denoted by Rev Bar & Does Not Materially Impact Original Ltr ML20206E7811999-04-29029 April 1999 Proposes Alternatives to Requirements of ASME B&PV Code Section XI,1992 Edition,1992 Addenda,As Listed.Approval of Alternative Request on or Before 990915,requested ML20205T2531999-04-22022 April 1999 Forwards LER 99-S02-00,describing Occurrence of Contract Employee Inappropriately Being Granted Unescorted Access to Plant Protected Area ML20205R2611999-04-20020 April 1999 Forwards Rev 19 to Physical Security Plan,Submitted in Accordance with 10CFR50.54(p).Plan Rev Was Approved & Implemented on 990407.Rev Withheld,Per 10CFR73.21 ML20205Q3241999-04-16016 April 1999 Submits Addl Info Re TS Change Request NPF-38-215 for Administrative Controls TS Changes.Appropriate Pages from New Entergy Common QA Program Manual Provided as Attachment to Ltr 1999-09-07
[Table view] Category:UTILITY TO NRC
MONTHYEARW3P90-1505, Forwards Proposed Operator Licensing Exam Schedule & Proposed Requalification Exam Schedule,Per Generic Ltr 90-071990-09-17017 September 1990 Forwards Proposed Operator Licensing Exam Schedule & Proposed Requalification Exam Schedule,Per Generic Ltr 90-07 W3P90-1163, Forwards Relief Requests Associated w/10-yr Inservice Insp Program Per Section 50.55a(g)(6)(i) of 10CFR501990-09-0606 September 1990 Forwards Relief Requests Associated w/10-yr Inservice Insp Program Per Section 50.55a(g)(6)(i) of 10CFR50 W3P90-1191, Responds to Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-382/90-15. Corrective Actions:Tech Spec Surveillance Procedure PE-005-004 Will Be Revised to Ensure That Normally Closed Valves Opened & Verified to Close for Toxic Gas Signal1990-08-31031 August 1990 Responds to Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-382/90-15. Corrective Actions:Tech Spec Surveillance Procedure PE-005-004 Will Be Revised to Ensure That Normally Closed Valves Opened & Verified to Close for Toxic Gas Signal W3P90-1194, Submits Fitness for Duty Performance Data for 6-month Period from Jan-June 19901990-08-29029 August 1990 Submits Fitness for Duty Performance Data for 6-month Period from Jan-June 1990 W3P90-1184, Responds to Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-382/90-14. Corrective Actions:Local Leak Rate Test Activities Shall Be Administratively Controlled to Require Use of Test Method Other than Pressure Decay1990-08-20020 August 1990 Responds to Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-382/90-14. Corrective Actions:Local Leak Rate Test Activities Shall Be Administratively Controlled to Require Use of Test Method Other than Pressure Decay W3P90-1187, Forwards Booklet Entitled, Safety Info - Plans to Help You During Emergencies, Recently Distributed to General Public1990-08-17017 August 1990 Forwards Booklet Entitled, Safety Info - Plans to Help You During Emergencies, Recently Distributed to General Public W3P90-1189, Forwards Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station Emergency Preparedness Exercise for 901024. Annual Exercise Will Be Performed Using Control Room Simulator1990-08-17017 August 1990 Forwards Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station Emergency Preparedness Exercise for 901024. Annual Exercise Will Be Performed Using Control Room Simulator W3P90-1162, Forwards Rev 4 to 10-Yr Inservice Insp Program First Interval 1985-19951990-08-16016 August 1990 Forwards Rev 4 to 10-Yr Inservice Insp Program First Interval 1985-1995 W3P90-1174, Forwards Rev to Emergency Plan & QA Program,Consisting of Chart Indicating Changes to Util Organization1990-08-0707 August 1990 Forwards Rev to Emergency Plan & QA Program,Consisting of Chart Indicating Changes to Util Organization W3P90-1177, Forwards Revised Objectives for Emergency Preparedness Exercise Scheduled for 9010241990-08-0303 August 1990 Forwards Revised Objectives for Emergency Preparedness Exercise Scheduled for 901024 W3P90-1164, Forwards Waterford Steam Electric Station Unit 3 Basemat Monitoring Program Special Rept 3. Rept Documents Continued Integrity of Basemat as Verified by Program from Time of Inception of Monitoring in 1985 Through Mar 19901990-08-0303 August 1990 Forwards Waterford Steam Electric Station Unit 3 Basemat Monitoring Program Special Rept 3. Rept Documents Continued Integrity of Basemat as Verified by Program from Time of Inception of Monitoring in 1985 Through Mar 1990 W3P90-1167, Forwards Rev 12 to Emergency Plan Implementing Instruction EP-001-001, Recognition & Classification of Emergency Conditions, Reflecting Name Change of State Agency to Louisiana Radiation Protection Div1990-07-19019 July 1990 Forwards Rev 12 to Emergency Plan Implementing Instruction EP-001-001, Recognition & Classification of Emergency Conditions, Reflecting Name Change of State Agency to Louisiana Radiation Protection Div W3P90-1148, Responds to NRC 900503 Submittal Concerning Review of Util Rev 6,Change 1 to Inservice Testing Program for Pumps & Valves1990-07-17017 July 1990 Responds to NRC 900503 Submittal Concerning Review of Util Rev 6,Change 1 to Inservice Testing Program for Pumps & Valves W3P90-1143, Advises That 900404 Request for Addl Info Re Tech Spec Change Request NPF-38-103 Will Be Provided by 900803.Change Will Extend Test Frequency of Channel Functional Tests for ESF Actuation Sys & Reactor Protection Sys Instrumentation1990-07-0606 July 1990 Advises That 900404 Request for Addl Info Re Tech Spec Change Request NPF-38-103 Will Be Provided by 900803.Change Will Extend Test Frequency of Channel Functional Tests for ESF Actuation Sys & Reactor Protection Sys Instrumentation W3P90-1379, Provides Notification That Util Has Consolidated Operation of All Nuclear Facilities,Effective 9006061990-07-0202 July 1990 Provides Notification That Util Has Consolidated Operation of All Nuclear Facilities,Effective 900606 ML20044A5541990-06-26026 June 1990 Forwards Response to Generic Ltr 90-04 Requesting Info on Status of Licensee Implementation of Generic Safety Issues Resolved W/Imposition of Requirements or Corrective Actions ML20044A5551990-06-22022 June 1990 Describes Changes Required to Emergency Plan as Result of Transfer of Operations to Entergy Operations,Inc. Administrative Changes to Plan Necessary to Distinguish Support Functions to Be Retained by Louisiana Power & Light W3P90-1365, Provides Notification of Change in Operator Status Per 10CFR50.74 Due to Entergy Corp Consolidating Operation of All Nuclear Generating Facilities,Including Plant Under Util1990-06-19019 June 1990 Provides Notification of Change in Operator Status Per 10CFR50.74 Due to Entergy Corp Consolidating Operation of All Nuclear Generating Facilities,Including Plant Under Util ML20043G3431990-06-14014 June 1990 Requests That All NRC Correspondence Re Plant Be Addressed to RP Barkhurst at Address Indicated in 900523 Ltr ML20043F5121990-06-0808 June 1990 Forwards List of Directors & Officers of Entergy Operations, Inc.Operation of All Plants Transferred to Entergy on 900606 ML20043F2621990-06-0606 June 1990 Requests Withdrawal of 900504 Request to Extend Implementation Date of Amend 60 Re Transfer of Operations to Entergy,Inc.All Necessary Regulatory Approvals Obtained & License Conditions Implemented ML20043C1861990-05-29029 May 1990 Submits Response to 900426 Comments Re Investigation Case 4-88-020.Util Issued P.O. Rev Downgrading Order of Circuit Breakers & Eliminating Nuclear Requirements ML20043E5441990-05-24024 May 1990 Forwards Public Version of Change 1 to Rev 2 to EPIP EP-002-015, Emergency Responder Activation. Release Memo Encl ML20043B3501990-05-23023 May 1990 Forwards Response to Concerns Noted in Insp Rept 50-382/90-02.Response Withheld ML20043B3781990-05-23023 May 1990 Requests Change in NRC Correspondence Distribution List, Deleting Rt Lally & Adding DC Hintz,Gw Muench & RB Mcgehee. All Ref to Util Changed to Entergy Operations,Inc.Proposed NRC Correspondence Distribution List Encl W3P90-1314, Requests NRC Concurrence That Design/Controls/Testing to Minimize Potential for Common Header Blockage Acceptable Per 900510 Meeting.Tap Alternatives for Shutdown Cooling Level Indication Sys Discussed1990-05-21021 May 1990 Requests NRC Concurrence That Design/Controls/Testing to Minimize Potential for Common Header Blockage Acceptable Per 900510 Meeting.Tap Alternatives for Shutdown Cooling Level Indication Sys Discussed ML20043B3271990-05-21021 May 1990 Forwards Justification for Continued Operation Re Taped Splice for Use in Instrument Circuits,Per 900517 Request ML20042F5251990-05-0404 May 1990 Requests Extension of 90 Days to Implement Amend 60 to License NPF-38 in Order to Provide Securities & Exchange Commission Time to Review Transfer of Licensed Activities to Entergy Operations,Inc ML20042E5501990-04-17017 April 1990 Responds to Request for Addl Info Re Feedwater Isolation Valve Bases Change Request Dtd 891006 ML20012F4551990-04-10010 April 1990 Forwards Rev 10,Change 4 to Physical Security Plan.Encl Withheld ML20012F5491990-04-0606 April 1990 Advises That Util Installed Two Addl Benchmarks for Use as Part of Basemat Surveillance Program to Increase Efficiency of Survey Readings.New Benchmarks Will Be Shown on FSAR Figure 1.2.1 as Part of Next FSAR Rev ML20012F3181990-04-0606 April 1990 Forwards Util,New Orleans Public Svc,Inc & Entergy Corp 1989 Annual Repts ML20012E8971990-03-30030 March 1990 Submits Results of Evaluation of Util 900414 Response to Station Blackout Rule (10CFR50.63).Station Mod May Be Required to Change Starting Air Sys to Accomodate Compressed Bottled Air ML20012E2551990-03-27027 March 1990 Responds to Violation Noted in Insp Rept 50-382/90-01. Corrective Actions:Qa Review of Licensed Operator Medical Exam Records Conducted & Sys Implemented to Track Types & Due Dates of Medical Exams Required for Operators ML20012E0511990-03-27027 March 1990 Forwards Rev 10,Change 3 to Physical Security Plan.Rev Withheld ML20012D5461990-03-22022 March 1990 Forwards Documentation from Nuclear Mutual Ltd,Nelia & Nuclear Electric Insurance Ltd Certifying Present Onsite Property Damage Insurance ML20012D4911990-03-21021 March 1990 Responds to NRC 900208 Ltr Re Violations Noted in Investigation Rept 4-89-002.Corrective Action:Proper Sequence of Insp Hold Point Placed in Procedure Under Change Implemented on 880425 ML20012C0691990-03-14014 March 1990 Advises That Util Intends to Address Steam Generator Overfill Concerns (USI A-47) Utilizing Individual Plant Exam Process,Per Generic Ltr 89-14 ML20012C0421990-03-12012 March 1990 Forwards Questionnaire in Response to Generic Ltr 90-01, Request for Voluntary Participation in NRC Regulatory Impact Survey. Results Not Reflective of Particular Calendar Yr ML20012B6731990-03-0707 March 1990 Responds to NRC Bulletin 88-011,Action 1.a Re Insp of Surge Line to Determine Discernible Distress or Structural Damage & Advises That Neither Surge Line Nor Affiliated Hardware Suffered Any Discernible Distress or Structural Damage ML20006F5321990-02-22022 February 1990 Forwards Payment for Order Imposing Civil Monetary Penalty in Response to Enforcement Action EA-89-069 ML20011F1401990-02-21021 February 1990 Responds to Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-382/89-41. Corrective Action:Review of Independent Verification Requirements Re Maint Activities Performed ML20006F1731990-02-19019 February 1990 Forwards Corrected Pages 9.2-21 & 9.2-22 of Rev 3 to FSAR, Per 891214 Ltr ML20006E5781990-02-13013 February 1990 Forwards Third Refueling Inservice Insp Summary Rept for Waterford Steam Electric Station Unit 3. ML20006D0571990-02-0202 February 1990 Responds to SALP Rept for Aug 1988 - Oct 1989.Contrary to Info Contained in SALP Rept,Civil Penalty Not Assessed by State of Nv for Radioactive Matl Transport Violations.Issue Resolved W/State of Nv W/O Issuance of Civil Penalty ML20006C1631990-01-30030 January 1990 Requests Extension of Commitment Dates in Response to Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-382/89-17 & 50-382/89-22 to 900222 & 19,respectively.Violations Covered Use of Duplex Strainers & Missing Seismic Support for Cabinet ML20006C1581990-01-29029 January 1990 Forwards Response to Generic Ltr 89-13 Re safety-related Open Svc Water Sys.Instruments in Place on Component Cooling Water Sys/Auxiliary Component Cooling Water Sys HXs Which Connect to Plant Monitor Computer ML20006C1611990-01-29029 January 1990 Responds to NRC Bulletin 89-003 Re Potential Loss of Required Shutdown Margin During Refueling Operations. Instructions for Determining Acceptable Refueling Boron Concentration Provided in Procedure RF-005-001 ML20006B4121990-01-26026 January 1990 Informs That Photographic Surveys Discontinued,Per Basemat Monitoring Program.Monitoring Program Implementing Procedure Will Be Revised to Reflect Change ML20006A7091990-01-22022 January 1990 Forwards List of Individuals That No Longer Require Reactor Operator Licenses at Plant 1990-09-06
[Table view] |
Text
.-- .. _.
T I
LOUISIANA ,42 ouAnoNoe srecc1 P O W E R & L I G H T! P O box 6008
- NN sYsY[O June 16, 1982 L. V. MAURIN Vice President Nuclear Operations W3P82-1464 Q A30.16 Mr. R. L. Tedesco Assistant Director of Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555
SUBJECT:
Waterford Steam Electric Station - Unit No. 3 Docket No. 50-382 Environmental Protection Plan (Nonradiological)
Reference:
Louisiana Power & Light Co. Letter No. W3P82-1229 dated 26 May 1982
Dear Mr. Tedesco:
Enclosed is one copy of the Waterford Steam Electric Station - Unit No. 3 Envinonmental Protection Plan (EPP) . Seven copies of this Plan were transmitted to you with the above referenced letter, however, the accompanying af fidavit was inadvertently not notarized. We apologize for the oversight , and with this letter and af fidavit , resubmit the EPP.
Yours very truly,
/
UM L. V. Maurin LVM/CDG/pco Attachment 30o1 cc: W. M. Stevenson, E. L. Blake, S. Black 8206220349 820616 DR ADOCK 05000382 PDR
> s
. .i Before the UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION DOCKET No. 50-382 In the Matter of Louisiana Power & Light Company ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PLAN (NONRADIOLOGICAL)
Louisiana Power and Light Company, Applicant in the above captioned proceeding, hereby files its Environmental Protection Plan.
This Environmental Protection Plan provides for the protection of environmental resources in the vicinity of Waterford 3 from any identified or unreviewed nonradiological environmental effects associated with facility operation, and addresses in detail the program for protecting the cultural resource remains on the Waterford 3 plant site.
Respectfully submittei, LOUISIANA POWER & LIGHI COMPANY Y
L. V. Maurin R ??? =^
Vice President Nuclear Operations Date:
STATE OF LOUISIANA )
) SS PARISil 0F ORLEANS )
L. V. Maurin, being duly sworn, states that he is Vice President Nuclear Operations of Louisiana Power & Light Company and that he is authorized on the part of said company to sign and file with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission this amendment.
0 bu r , -
~ ~ ~ ' ' '
L. V. Maurin SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me, a Notary Public in and for the Parish and State above named, this g 7 y day of App /p(JJ Jf 4%d/W, Notary Pub'lic l
l i
l My Commission expires:
,0 /} fkI l
l l
j 1
WATERFORD STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - UNIT NO. 3 l
LOUISIANA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
! DOCKET No 50-382 1
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PLAN (NON-RADIOLOGICAL) l APRIL 1982 l
I, d
l
{
5 0
DtsQL
. --8 2 0 tn o 2 o + t p.-
v WATERFORD SES - UNIT NO. 3 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PLAN (NON-RADIOLOGICAL)
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Objectives of the Environmental Protection Plan 1-1 2.0 Environmental Resource Protection Issues 2-1 2.1 Aquatic Resources 2-1 2.2 Terrestrial Resources 2-2 2.3 Cultural Resources 2-2 3.0 Consistency Requirements 3-1 3.1 Plant Design and Operation 3-1 3.2 Reporting Related to the NPDES Permits and State Certification 3-3 33 Changes Required for Compliance with Other Environmental Regulations 3-3 1,
4.0 Environmental Conditions 4-1 4.1 Unusual or Important Environmental Events 4-1 4.2 Environmental Monitoring 4-2 5.0 Administrative Procedures 5-1 5.1 Review and Audit 5-1
~
5.2 Records Retention 5-1 5.3 Changes in Environmental Protection Plan 5-2 5.4 Plant Reporting Requirements 5-2
1.0 Objectives of the Environmental Protection Plan This Environmental Protection Plan (EPP) developed and implemented by the Louisiana Power & Light Company (LP&L) provides for protection of environmental values during the operation of the Waterford SES Unit No.3 nuclear facility (Waterford 3). The principal objectives of this EPP are as follows:
(1) Verify that the plant is operated in an environmentally acceptable manner, as established by the Final Environmental Statement Related to the Operation of Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit No. 3 (FES), NUREG 0779, and other NRC environmental impact assessments..
(2) Maintain consistency with other applicable Federal, state and local requirements f or environmental protection.
(3) Describe the procedures for inf orming NRC of unanticipated non-radiological environmental effects of facility operation and any mitigating actions.
Water quality matters are regulated by way of LP&L's NPDES Permit.
e 1-1
e 2.0 Environmental Resource Protection Issues The staf f described the existing environment in the vicinity of the Waterford 3 and the potential environmental effects from its operation in the FES. The staf f analyzed these effects and concluded that the only resource requiring special protective measures is of an archaeological nature (see Cultural Resources section below). The environmental resources which were evaluated, and the corresponding NRC staff decisions regarding the protection of each resource are as follows:
2.1 Aquatic Resources ,
LP&L has gathered data on the aquatic resources of the Mississippi River in the vicinity of Waterford 3 during the preoperational phase in a series of seasonal and monthly sampling surveys. Analysis of this data and evaluation of the impacts on the aquatic resources from the operation of Waterford 3 is contained in demonstrations prepared by LP&L for the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region VI, pursuant to Sections 316 (a) and (b) of the Clean Water Act. The conclusion of these demonstrations, which was subsequently concurred with by EPA, is that the aquatic ecology and water quality of the Mississippi River in the vicinity of the site are areas of low potential for adverse impact. This fact, coupled with the plans for infrequent usage of chlorination and the quality of wastewater discharges at Waterford 3, was c~onsidered in developing water quality monitoring requirements.
2-1
Aquatic resource effects and other water quality matters are taken into consideration in assigning effluent limitations and monitoring requirements contained in the NPDES Permit No. LA 0007374 issued by the US Environmental Protection Agency, Region VI. The NRC will rely on this agency for resolution of the issues involving protection of water quality and aquatic biota.
2.2 Terrestrial Resources LP&L has gathered terrestrial ecology data on the Waterford site and in the vicinity of the site for the preoperational phase of the project. As documented in the FES, the staff reviewed the results of this monitoring program. It concluded that the operational impact of Waterford 3 is not expected to have any long-term effects on the terrestrial biota, and theref ore has determined that there is no need for an operational phase terrestrial ecology monitoring program.
2.3 Cultural Resources i
I. DESCRIPTION OF RESOURCE l
LP&L's Waterford Property contains two distinct areas with cultural resource remains from the Waterf ord Plantation that have been determined to be eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. These remains are associated with the Plantation Overseer's House and the Plantation Quarters Site.
2-2
Both of these archaeological sites consist solely of artifactual material (glass, metal, bone, ceramic, wood, etc.) lying immediately beneath the ,
present ground surf ace. No standing ruins or readily identifiable surf ace remains are present. The cultural value of the two sites lies in the information they may provide to historians, archaeologists, and anthropologists. 'k The Waterford Plantation Overseer's House Site is located within a circular area approximately 200 feet in diameter with its approximate center at UTM coordinates Zone 15, Easting 744520, Northing 3320720. The Waterford Plantation Quarters Site is a north-south generally rectangular area measuring approximately 900 feet by 200 feet with its approximate center at UTM coordinates Zone 15, Easting 744285, Northing 3320420. The boundaries of both areas are shown on the accompanying figure. As shown on this figure, both areas lie outside the limits of the plant security f e nc e.
II. PROTECTION PROCEDURES The environmental protection program for ensuring that these cultural resource remains are not damaged consists of routine surveillance to protect these artifacts and their context from unauthorized removal or damage, and institution of a program to ensure that, .in the event that ground disturbance is required in these areas, these a'rtif acts will be appropriately protected f or their cultural resource inf ormation value.
2-3
\ ,
\
gar J
. \
.e
- /Vrp A a
='4> "E"" *",=f='.'"*
= = = ""."JE'
, ,I
.\
O g r:
fp .=a g
/
j . f
% Ql; ,N. _
o :: Plantation Overseer's House Siteki;;
- .=
Q% .-E.'**
t
. M l Y
<--.Jf M ;
- g. vg m,.a. - .
,'
s;,.m asse sse s.pessessemesamersem e na': se
- av-,, % _- e l f u4 f " A*u .,
Plantation tm %- j ua ,my '
"*'J"*
. h
'l ~%gh s [ "" ** l Quarter's ll d j; f *, Site ll
,,,g, ;J 7 i
("N. "."." .'Eur' H
?
. _ / **
"X,. ji rj =
N ll q
a::
)
% .*.. 9..
...+....g..._-
y r
g:.
. ,. f a .,, w e, n U
g y '
,p'
- ././ \ .!
I
?! -. U :;
l' /
0 ll :a
" ' ~
.f- - -
' o ::
u a
,[ l.
a a
f !!
-*"*' - ll !
T. u a se a 4
- u b s. 1 ll
. 4 .
j s haa ssa4s s sawa es._ 4 . ass [ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . . . . . _ , , ~ ,
j n f 8
.. n % g l
, j
!;[ h .,
l
'1 .,!.
. .' !! __ fi' 1:e _
1 - a ll1 n.g C J'j -lj i
- - M -
J -'* b a
. :: :: -(-
N ll sagys sssus ss ss9 ss_/s = = = = s =sss s=t j s3===ss as erassmeses it
.i j;
l>1 !;
'lI 4
,=::.~. li I;
'"a u
.is I !! :: ::
~ {
'l; :;
.... . :: .. h.,.,
. i
..,.j............y..A=
L ., ....o........===== .o A. . . .
FIGURE L cation of Waterford Plantation Quarter's Site and Plantation Overseer's house
A. Routine Environmental Protection Procedures The protected areas will be checked as a part of the station's routine environmental surveillance procedures to ensure that no unauthorized activities occur which could damage the resources. In the event that any significant ground disturbing activities unauthorized by LP&L are found to have taken place within the protected area, LP&L shall notify the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) and have an assessment of the damage made by an archaeologist certified by the Society of Professional Archaeologists. Any such assessments shall commence as soon as practicable af ter the discovery of the unauthorized activities. The assessment shall be f orwarded to the SHPO as soon as it is available. In addition, appropriate corrective actions shall be initiated by LP&L to '
ensure the continued protection of the resource.
B. Cultural Resources - Special Protection Procedures Should LP&L, or an authorized representative, agent, sub-contractor or l
consultant find it necessary to conduct any activities within the i
protected areas, the Special Protection Procedures (as outlined below) will be employed. Activities requiring implementation of these procedures include:
- Excavation'(including trenching, dril.'.ing or 'any other form of soil removal or displacement whether by hand or machine);
l
Landscaping, sodding or planting of shrubbery or trees except that routine maintenance of existing landscaping and or continuation of agricultural activities shall be permitted; Placement of any fill, spoil, or ground cover; and Any construction.
In the event that uncertainty exists concerning the applicability of the Special Protection Procedures, LP&L will consult the SHP0 for a final decision.
Should activities other than those described above be necessary, LP&L shall ensure that all personnel involved in such activities are instructed not to pick up, collect, or otherwise disturb any artifactual material (including any object or fragment of wood, bone, stone, glass, metal, ceramic, textile, etc.) within the protected area.
- 1) Special Protection Procedures
- 1) LP&L shall notify the SHPO in writing of any activities involving ground disturbance in the protected areas. This communication should include the following:
A description of the proposed activity (ie drawings and/or available specifications, if applicable); .
2-5
A description of the need for the activity; A map showing the location of the planned activity in relation to the protected areas; and A demonstration of the need to perform the activity within the protected area.
- 2) The SHP0 will advise LP&L within 21 days of receipt of the written information of the need for a mitigation plan. If no plan is required or if the SHPO fails to respond, LP&L may proceed with the planned activity. If the SHPO advises that a mitigation plan is needed, the rationale for this requirement shall be clearly detailed in a letter to LP&L.
Items 3, 4, 5 and 6 (below) only apply if a mitigation plan is necessary.
- 3) If advised by the SHPO that a mitigation plan is necessary, LP&L will submit a mitigation plan prepared by an archaeologist certified by the Society of Professional Archaeologists in field research and cultural resource management.
- 4) The SEPO shall provide comment on the proposed mitigation plan within 30 days.
- 5) LP&L will revise the mitigation plan to respond, as appropriate, to the comments of the SHPO and shall execute the plan in accordance with the schedule which shall be part of the plan.
l l
2-6
- 6) At the conclusion of mitigation activities, LP&L shall submit a report to the SHPO as described below.
- 11. Mitigation Program In the event that the SHP0 advises that a mitigation plan is needed for the protection of the cultural resource remains, LP&L shall have the plan preparation supervised by an archaeologist certified by the Society of Professional Archaeologists in field research and cultural resource management. The scope of the plan shall be commensurate with the degree of disturbance to the resource. If the planned action involving disturbance of this resource requires data recovery operations to ensure adequate protection of the resource, the research design and its execution will conform as closely as possible to the " Recommendations for Archaeological Data Recovery" contained in Treatment of Archaeological Properties published by the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation.
The plan shall include a schedule of major milestone dates for its completion and the subsequent approval process.
The results of the mitigation plan shall be documented in a report to be i submitted to the SHPO and the NRC. The report shall describe the l
l activity in question, the adopted mitigation plan and the results of the mitigation activities. The report may include maps showing the locations
~
and boundaries of the mitigation activities as well as the locations of the resource with respect to the disturbing activity. In addition, the 2-7
report shall provide documentation of the implementation of the mitigation plan. If data recovery operations are involved LP&L will
/
consider permitting publication and appropriate distribution of the final report to those interested parties such as archaeologists, historians, local libraries and universities.
III. OTHER PROTECTIVE MEASURES Should LP&L find it necessary to engage in ground disturbing activities (such as those listed above) in close proximity to, but not within, the boundary of a protected area, LP&L will ensure that the protected areas are not infringed upon by these activities and are thereby protected for the duration of such work. It will not be necessary for LP&L to notify the SHP0 of such activities.
IV. EMERGENCY SITUATIONS ,
In the event that LP&L finds it necessary to engage in activities within the protected area for the immediate protection of public health and safety, and any delay in the execution of those activities could result in the creation of a public health hazard, LP&L may proceed with those
. activities without an approved mitigation plan. As soon as practicable following completion of activities, LP&L shall submit to the SHPO an evaluation of the current condition of the protected area (s) (including a description of any damages) prepared by an archaeologist certified by the Society of Professional Archaeologists.
2-8
4 V. ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH IN PROTECTED AREAS In the event that LP&L is notified that any individual, agency, institution, or organization desires to engage in archaeological research within the protected areas, and should LP&L ~ consider authorizing such activity, LP&L shall request preparation of a statement of qualifications and a research design. The SHPO shall be responsible for determining if the qualifications of the party requesting permission to conduct the research are adequate. In order to ensure protection of the resource, the research design must be approved by both LP&L and the SHPO prior to the start of any research. LP&L shall be under no obligation to allow, l
fund or otherwise support such research. Any artifactual material recovered will be the property of LP&L.
VI. NOTIFICATIONS i
i.
The SHP0 shall be notified zby the LP&L Vice President of Nuclear Operations or his designated representative of any plans which could disturb the protected areas or unauthorized activities which have disturbed the protected areas. This notification shall apply to both routine and special protection procedures as described in Section II of this plan.
l Should unauthorized ground disturbing activity occur within the protected i areas, LP&L shall notify the SHPO within 30 days of discovering evidence l
2-9
of such activity. The notification shall include a brief description of the ground disturbing activity and, as appropriate, a statement of corrective actions taken to ensure continued protection of the resource.
For planned ground disturbing activity within the protected areas, LP&L shall follow the procedures outlined in Section 2.3.11. B.i. The SHP0 shall subctit written comments to the LP&L Vice President Nuclear Operations within the stipulated schedule presented in Section 2.3.II.B.i. Should the SHPO fail to respond within the stipulated response period, LP&L may proceed with the planned activity.
O 2-10
v 3.0 Consistency Requirements i
l j The consistency requirements of this EPP provide for NRC's review of changes in the design and operation of Waterford 3 which involve an 1
l unreviewed environmental question. Should this type of change be required, LP&L must receive NRC approval prior to initiating the particular activity. In this manner, this EPP ensures the continued protection of environmental resources from potential adverse effects associated with unreviewed actions which may occur during the operation of Waterford 3.
3.1 Plant Design and Operation I
LP&L may make changes in station design or operation or perform tests or exper,iments affecting the environment provided such activities do not involve an unreviewed environmental question nor a change in the EPP*.
Changes in plant design or operation or performance of tests or experiments which do not affect the environment are not subject to the requirements of this EPP. Activities governed by Section 3.3 are not subject to the requirements of this section.
Before engaging in unauthorized construction or operational activities which may significantly af fect the environment, LP&L shall prepare
- This provision does not relieve the licensee of the requirements of 10 CFR 50.59 3-1
and record an environmental evaluation of such activity. When the evaluation indicates that such activity involves an unreviewed environmental question, LP&L shall provide a written evaluation of such activities and obtain prior approval from the Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. When such activity involves a change in the EPP, such activity and change to the EPP may be implemented only in accordance with an appropriate license amendment as set forth in Section 5.3 of this plan.
A proposed change, test or experiment shall be deemed to involve an unreviewed environmental question if it concerns: (1) a matter which may re sult in a significant increase in any adverse environmental impact previously evaluated in the final environmental statement (FES) as modified by staff's testimony to the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, supplements to the FES, er.;1ronmental impact appraisals, or in any decisions of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board; or (2) a significant change in ef fluents or power level (in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51.5(b)(2)) or (3) a matter not previously reviewed and evaluated in the documents specified in (1) of this Subsection, but which may have a significant adverse environmental impact.
LP&L shall maintain records of changes in facility design or operation and of tests and experiments carried out pursuant to this subsection.
l These records shall include written evaluation (s) which provide bases for l
the determination that the change, test, or experiment does not involve l
an unreviewed environmental question or constitute a decrease in the I
l i
! 3-2
effectiveness of this EPP to meet the objectives specified in Section ,
1.0. LP&L shall include as part of its Annual Environmental Operating Report (per Subsection 5.4.1) brief d'escriptions, analyses, interpretations, and evaluations of such changes, tests and experiments.
3.2 Reporting Related to the NPDES Permit Changes and additions to the NPDES Permit shall be reported to the NRC within 60 days following the date the change is approved. If a permit, in part or in its entirety, is appealed and stayed, the NRC shall be notified within 60 days following the date the stay is granted. LP&L shall provide the NRC with a copy of the application for renewal of the NPDES permit at the same time the application is submitted to the EPA.
3.3 Changes Required for Compliance with Other Environmental Regulations Changes in plant design or operation and performance of tests or experiments which are required to achieve compliance with other Federal, state, or local environmental regulations are not subject to the requirements of Section 3.1 3-3 1
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ ]
9 4.0 Environmental Conditions The environmental conditions of this EPP identify the environmental concerns LP&L must continue to observe and protect from adverse effects associated with the operation of Waterford 3. The conditions investigated for Waterford 3 involved protection of the existing terrestrial and aquatic resources and the cultural remains of the Waterford Plantation. Should there be any unusual, important or significant activities causally related to the operation of Waterford 3 which affect these resources, these environmental conditions specify the course of action LP&L is to follow.
4.1 Unusual or important Environmental Events Any occurrence of an unusual or important event that indicates or results in significant environmental impact causally related to station operation shall be recorded and promptly reported to the NRC within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> by telephone, telegraph, or facsimile transmissions followed by a written report within 30 days, as specified in Subsection 5 4.2. The following are examples: excessive bird impaction events; onsite plant or animal disease outbreaks; mortality or unusual occurrence of any species protected by the Endangered Species Act of 1973; substantial fish kills; significant increase in nuisance organisms or conditions; and
~
unanticipated or emergency discharge of waste or chemical substances.
No routine monitoring programs are required to implement this condition.
4-1
4.2 Environmental Monitoring The environmental conditions of the EPP specify monitoring requirements to protect the cultural resource remains of the Waterford Plantation.
These monitoring requirements are specified below.
4.2 1 Protection of Remains of the Eligible Portions of the Waterford Plantation LP&L shall avoid disturbances to the cultural resource remains of the Waterford Plantation Overseer's House Site and the Plantation Quarters Site. In the event that disturbance of these areas does become necessary, LP&L will consult with the SHP0 prior to commencing any activity.
No significant disrupting activities shall be undertaken until the procedures outlined in Section 2.3 of this EPP are effectuated.
In addition, the areas containing these cultural resource remains will be routinely checked as a part of the station's environmental surveillance program.
4-2
5.0 Administrative Procedures The administrative procedures involved in the conduct of this EPP shall include independent audit to demonstrate compliance with the plan, retention of plan records and preparation of both routine and nonroutine reports. In addition, these procedures provide a methodology for LP&L to request a change in any of the conditions of this EPP.
51 Review and Audit LP&L shall provide for review and audit of compliance with the EPP.
Audits shall be conducted independently of the individual or groups responsible for performing the specific activity. A description of the organizational structure utilized to achieve the independent review and audit function, and results of the audit activities shall be maintained and made available for inspection.
5.2 Records Retention 1
Records and logs relative to the environmental aspects of plant operation shall be maintained in a manner convenient for review and inspection.
These records and logs shall be made available to the NRC on request.
Records of modificat' ions to plant structures, systems and components determined to potentially affect the continued protection of the environment shall be retained for the life of the plant. All other records, data and logs relating to this EPP shall be retained for at 5-1
least five years or, longer, when required by appropriate' regulatory agencies.
5.3 Changes in Environmental Protection Plan Requests for changes in this EPP shall include an assessment of the environmental impact of the proposed change and a supporting justification. Implementation of such changes in the EPP should not commence prior to NRC approval of those proposed changes, unless mitigating circumstances prevail. When mitigating circumstances prevail, LP&L shall verbally notify the Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, explain the circumstances, and if approved, proceed with the proposed change. LP&L shall follow up all such verbal approvals with written documentation of the change.
5.4 Plant Reporting Requirements This EPP requires the submittal of both annual routine reports and nonroutine reports. The contents of these reports are described below.
5.4 1 Routine Reports An Annual Environmental Operating Report describing implementation of i _
this EPP for the previous year shall be submitted to the NRC prior to May 1 of each year. The initial report shall be submitted prior to May 1 of the year following issuance of the operating license. The period of the
~
first report shall begin with the date of issaance of the operating -
license.
5-2
The report shall include rummaries and analyses of the results of the environmental protection activities required by Section 4.2 of this EPP for the report period, including a comparison with any related s studies, operational controls (as appropriate), and previous non radiological environmental monitoring reports, as well as an assessment of the observed impacts of the plant operation on the environment. If harmful ef fects or evidence of trends towards irreversible damage to the environment are observed, LP&L shall provide a detailed analysis of the data and a proposed course of mitigating action.
In addition to reporting the results of these routine EPP requirements, the Annual Environmental Operating Report shall also include:
(a) A list of EPP noncompliances and the corrective actions taken to renedy them.
(b) A list of all changes in station design or o'peration, tests, and experiments made in accordance with Section 3.1 which involved a
! potentially significant unreviewed environmental issue.
l (c) A list of nonroutine reports submitted in accordance with Subsection 5.4.2.
5-3
4 in the event that all data are not available by the due date of the report, the report shall be submitted noting and explaining the missing results. The missing data shall be submitted as soon as possible in a supplementary report.
5.4.2 Nonroutine Reports A written report shall be submitted to the NRC within 30 days of the occurrence of an unusual or important environmental event described in Section 4.1 of this plan. The report shall (a) describe, analyze, and evaluate the event, including extent and magnitude of the impact and plant operating characteristics, (b) describe the probable cause of the event, (c) indicate the action taken to correct the reported event, (d) indicate the corrective action taken to preclude repetition of the event and to prevent similar occurrences involving similar components or systems, and (e) indicate the agencies notified and their preliminary responses.
Events reportable under this subsection which also require reporte to other Federal, state or local agencies shall be reported in accordance with those reporting requirements in lieu of the requirements of this subsection. The NRC shall be provided a copy of such report at the same time it is submitted to the other agency.
5-4
._