ML20054E936
| ML20054E936 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05000000, Salem |
| Issue date: | 01/29/1982 |
| From: | Zupko J Public Service Enterprise Group |
| To: | Harold Denton, Varga S Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML082840632 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-82-161 NUDOCS 8206150049 | |
| Download: ML20054E936 (6) | |
Text
,
0 h
I " ' O PSEG
,g h
Public Service Electric and Gas Cornpany 80 Park Plaza Newark, NJ. 07101 Pho 20d1/430-7
+* e O/"
qs w
January 29, 1982 7,
Mr. Harold Denton Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation e
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission y
Washington, DC 20555 Attention:
Mr. Steven A. Varga, Chief Operating Reactors Branch 1 Division of Licensing Gentlemen:
STATUS OF INSTALLATION AND TESTING OF PROMPT
.1LERTING AND NOTIFICATION SYSTEM SALEM GENERATING STATION UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2 DOCKET NOS. 50-272 AND 50-311
(
The siren system as described in our May 26, 1981 submittal of the Salem Generating Station emergency plan has been installed and component tested.
We are presently continuing to correct minor problems with individual sirens in both the States of New Jersey and Delaware and siren activation equip-ment for the sirens located in Delaware.
To date we have successfully conducted siren system silent and growl tests in New Jersey.
Initial testing of selected sirens in Delaware indicate that the system is operational.
Complete silent and growl test of all sirens in Delaware should be com-pleted by February 12, 1982.
Both states have been provided with Implementing Procedures, state and county individuals responsible for activating the siren system have been briefed on its operation and the system is presently capable of being used should the need arise.
It is our understanding that this satisfies the requirement of 10CFR50, Appendix E, IV, D.3 and that we have therefore
" demonstrated that administrative and physical means have been established for alerting and providing prompt instructions to the public within the plume exposure pathway EPZ".
Additionally, it is our understanding that the four-month period in 10CFR 50.54 (5) (2) for correction of deficiencies identified during and after initial installation and testing will apply to any system deficiencies identified during future tests.
g6g49 820421 WADE 82-161 PDR n-___=-
Status of Installation and January 29, 1982 Testing of Prompt Alerting and Notification System
\\, presents an update of our past and projected milestones.
The siren system acoustical testing shown as Item 2 was completed slightly ahead of schedule but the report of the final results has not yet been received.
This report will specifically define and document those areas covered by the sirens.
Although we are confident that the system as designed will meet NRC requirements, a complete system wide test with public participation will be performed during February.
This test is intended to improve public awareness of the system and to obtain input from the public on their percep-tion of the system's effectiveness.
If you have any questions concerning this program, please feel free to. contact me.
Sincerely, r
g J. M.
Zupko, Jr.
t General Manager -
\\s Nuclear Services CC Mr.
R.
C.
Haynes, Director Office of Inspection and Enforcement Region I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, PA 19406 Mr. Brian K.
Grimes, Director Division of Emergency Preparedness Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555~
Mr. Darrell G.
Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 4
4 e
e
s g
i Projected Milestones as of January 29, 1982: Sirer: System
/
Previous Projection Present Projection 1)
Complete Siren System installed and 10/16/81 10/16/81*
i functionally tested l
l 2)
Siren System Acoustical Test 11/13/81 11/11/81*
(design verification and acceptance) l 3)
Siren System Silent Test 12/18/81 12/18/81*
New Jersey 1/29/82 Delaware 4)
Siren System Growl Test 12/22/81 12/30/81*
New Jersey 2/12/82 Delaware 5)
Siren System operationally turned 1/01/82 1/29/82 over to States.
6)
Siren System Test - Utility and States 1/07/82 mid-to late-(public participation and verification February of system effectiveness)
- Task completed prior to this letter.
~
Projected Milestones: EBS Radio System t
Previous Projection Present Projection 1)
Request for Proposal ' issued 10/05/81 10/05/81*
2)
Vendor bids received 10/26/81 10/26/81*
3)
Issue Purchase Order for EBS Radio 11/15/81 11/06/81*
Receivers 4)
Delivery of EBS Radio-Receivers 3/15/82 2/15/82-3/15/82 1
5)
Distribution of EBS Radio Receivers 4/01/82 4/01/82
]
.6)
EDS Radio System Test 4/15/82 4/15/82 l
- Task completed prior to this letter.
l t
e o
G
t.' 7 ).-
1
.j 7 b,,
% \\
8.s \\ r
)
(
4.Q7"ju s
\\
l-
\\
1.l # A INT 0".!'ATI_O_N SHEET d
^
E4CEti!PU$
1.
Pacility:
7,sCrosce noiling UArdr IleAcrOr 2.
Size:
5 0 %'e 3.
EPZ Site:
5 m31e It.
Ali r r. fiyare.m Data and Current Status
=
1.
"lYpe of alcrt system:
One 60 deelbul ulten for the ik mile F.F7.
plus eight tone alert radinn to he. inntitt. led in homcc 2.
Daten desir.n study initiated and comp 3cted: : September 1981 3.
Date equipment ordered:
October nnd December, 1981 4.
Anount of equipment un hand:
One pule, one siren plun viring
\\~
5.
Date. Inst.allation ol' equipment bogsn:
January 12, 1987 6.
Date inctollation.of equip:aent t enopl e. red : February 1, 1982
/.
Fraction of cystem installed:
None, on nf.Tannary 12, 1982 S.
Date of Intrial alarring nyntem test:: after 1:.stallation 9.
Results of loi rimi sale.rr.ing syntem test and schedulin>; for fixlug deficiencien:
N/A 10.
D.ite of alert and :nnri tication test (cvaluated by FEMA): Nut yet determined 11.
Resulrn of ale.rr. And notification test and schedule for fidog.6 de.fi ci enci es (by FEMA):
Not yet upplieuble I?.
Propoced compentsutory measutus until alcrt cyctem initial text:
Knr kniun C.
Factorn hearing on enforcetsent in addition tn item:t R.2-8 and 12 above 1.
Eqisi pme n t. vendor probicas:
No s
e
~
(
\\
t d
. l l \\
7.
I.ot.il sie. :s i.gp. 1pp roval p rohltnot :
No.m
- 1 P13ht of sn,y n ob1cern:
Some dultiy,1 ut eppa sived netw-4 W. trce,nene.y (license) pro?.tesi:2 1.*f A 5
Adverse wc::thg1 :
Choul dn' t lac a pre?.~. ti im limited inntallatiore U.
f Icont:et: teritten co.unnic: tionn 1 o NF:C on factorr. Ahnvn: Non e.
s 5.a..
.,n.. s, c..nt y~-p.J;., A..'&qa l
.c a.;..(z i
/
e b,. - :.k.-e.L ~.J.c..
6.
p u t 2Lg.7 b.t ~.4.
(> <1r+t *pA ~ u< d k i.L.ix&.t L,.3 f"4 I I?61 t'/
i,
- b.<
.:,. p mu.g
- y. ae.,w
>[. M y 7
~
ft.a f L A ~~- ""'*
(
. ~ l' L (b.>.
e.i.. d a a e.L c2 n ~ -.d ~.. k. m.a.c 1, -t.L.t~kI^h^'A s
-j-l