ML20054E703
| ML20054E703 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 05/26/1982 |
| From: | Costello J, Hale C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20054E701 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900522 NUDOCS 8206140084 | |
| Download: ML20054E703 (11) | |
Text
.
ORGANIZATION:
BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION SAN FRANCISCO POWER DIVISION SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA REPORT INSPECTION INSPECTION NO.:
99900522/82-01 DATE(S) 4/19-23/82 ON-S'_TE HOURS: 32 CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS:
Bechtel Power Corporation San Francisco Power Division ATTN:
Mr. C. D. Statton, V. Pres. and Gen. Mgr.
P. O. Box 3965 San Francisco, CA 94119 ORGANIZATIONAL CONTACT:
Mr. C. W. Dick, QA Manager TELEPHONE NUMBER:
(415) 768-0790 PRINCIPAL PRODUCT: Architect Engineering Services NUCLEAR INDUSTRY ACTIVITY: The total effort committed to domestic nuclear activities is approximately 92% of the 6700 person staff of the San Francisco Power Division.
The division currently provides the principal architect engineering services for five domestic units:
Limerick 1 and 2; Susquehanna 1 and 2; and Hope Creek 1; has project management for completion of Diablo Canyon 1 a.'d 2; has 12 units under a modification / repair / service-type contract plus an engineering evaluation contract with an NSSS supplier.
ASSIGNED INSPECTOR: hM. /(h M f/26 /F-
~
yflR.Costello,ReactorSystemsSection(RSS)
~
Date v
OTHER INSPECTOR (S):
APPROVED BY:
O/
I h%
C.J.(hple, Chief,R5S Date'/ '
INSPECTION BASES AND SCOPE:
A.
BASES:
10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, and Topical Report No. BQ-TOP-1.
B.
SCOPE:
This inspection was conducted to assess the effectiveness of Bechtel's QA program in the area of Evaluation of Supplier Performance /
Verification Activities and to check on the status of previous inspection findings.
PLANT SITE APPLICABILITY:
The contents of this report relate to the following dockets:
50-354, 50-387, and 50-388.
8206140084 820527 PDR GA999 EECBECH 99900522 PDR
ORGANIZATION:
BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION SAN FRANCISCO POWER DIVISION SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA REPORT INSPECTION NO.:
99900522/82-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 2 of 3 A.
VIOLATIONS:
None B.
NONCONFORMANCES:
None C.
UNRESOLVED ITEMS:
1.
It is not apparent that the requirements of EDPI-4.64.1 for reviewing and dispositioning quality surveillance reports are functioning properly.
Hope Creek Quality Surveillance Report No. 96 required procurement supplier quality action by July 10, 1981.
The inspector was unable to obtain any evidence during this inspection that the required action had been completed.
2.
It is not apparent that the requirements for specificity concerning codes and standards contained in EDP-4.49 are being satisfied.
EDP-4.49 required that applicable codes, standards and regulatory requirements have the issue and addenda properly identified and that these requirements be met in the design.
The inspector exaulined four Hope Creek project specifications and found that specification 10855-A-075(Q) did not specify the issue and addenda of four out of five codes and standards listed while speci-fication 10855-J-111(Q) did not specify the issue of ANSI N45.2 in effect.
The inspector will review this matter further on the next inspection.
D.
STATUS OF PREVIOUS INSPECTION FINDINGS:
1.
(Closed) Unresolved Item (80-03):
The position of relying on IE Bulletin activities to evaluate the significance of a potential safety hazard, instead of evaluating per 10 CFR Part 21, has been submitted to NRC Headquarters for review.
i NRC Headquarters reply to the above concern stated that once a director or responsible officer of a company subject to 10 CFR Part 21, obtains informatica reasonably indicating that a defect exists, he must inform the Commission unless he knows that the Commission has already been adequately informed.
l l
1
\\
ORGANIZATION:
BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION SAN FRANCISCO POWER DIVISION SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA REPORT IN5Ptti10N NO.:
99900522/82-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 3 of 3 In the two cases discussed in the 80-03 report, both were reported under 10 CFR Part 50.55(e).
The cases involved pilot solenoid valves and pipe supports for the Susquehanna project.
Both cases were referred to the 10 CFR Part 21 Evaluation Committee who determined that these defects did not exist on any other active projects at San Francisco Power Division (SFPD).
The committee also decided not to report these defects under 10 CFR Part 21 for nonactive projects at SFPD because the Commission was aware of the problem and was taking corrective action on all plants through IE Bulletins79-01A, 79-01B, and 79-14.
The inspector reviewed the action taken at SFPD and the required action requested by the IE Bulletins and concluded that the 10 CFR Part 21 Evaluation Committee actions were proper for these cases.
2.
(Closed) Unresolved Item (81-03):
The effectiveness of EDP-4.65 (Design Deficiency Processing) in implementing Section 9 (Design Corrective Action) of ANSI N45.2.11 could not be demonstrated during this inspection.
This area will be examined further during a future inspection.
Section II, No. 2 of the Nuclear Quality Assurance Manual (NQAM) has been revised as of April 19, 1982, to require Project QA to be responsible for documenting recommended corrective actions to minimize recurrence of design errors and to be responsible for tracking to ensure completion of the action.
This revision to the NQAM requires a change to or cancellation of EDP-4.65 which had required that engineering track CAR's.
This change in responsibilities should provide a more effective method of implementing Section 9 of ANSI N45.2.11.
E.
OTHER FINDINGS OR COMMENTS:
Evaluation of Supplier Performance / Verification Activities - Applicable quality assurance and project procedures were examined to determine quality assurance program commitments.
To verify 'mplementation of these commit-ments, the following documents were examined:
aee quality surveillance reports, one project field supplier quality 4)
, two supplier quality assurance manuals, five material requisiti"),
ur supplier quality program evaluation reports, seven suppl e Lee'
.y program audit reports, l
four supplier evaluation review reports ad u.
.g supplier performance evaluation reports.
Relative to the docu.nents examined, two unresolved items were identified.
(See section C above.)
l
PERSONS CONTACTED Beck fel !$F PO Dates
+// 9 - 23 /6 2 Company Docket / Report No. 999 00 [22/82-01 Inspector
.). R. G s Fe, Pag'e / of / NAME(Please Print) TIT 1.E(Please Print) ORGANIZATION (Please Print) L.'3. Anosasou See,wum & QE. &cmu (sFrp) Ex. 7x & n:me / :', -/ Aqwius c 3. 7 5'u c u t/ 4 d A 95s E PP-of. && h nt, (SF?h) t%:ticAJe G. Moo L4on %,. A GAe B. kb5L e-B. H. Fe apreAl Pa.reer @miryEnex Becerrs (s f p p h 6.S)4r0 b GF EfdCW76 PC) $0 P v. E N 9. h. o w s e 3 E c 9 TE L (fFPD TJ 3 N rs n o (7 V fE. Jimie k{ ~ Pro (eal SC%perviw 15ECH TEL[6FPD) $fd/ff,< 4 o.7 0 C J a r HEt#7dL T. V. CVAMT Q6' beturEL-A B Cdor ; faw,we p,,. 4ny fpep;r.2=.t 'R S /%, A):0s coo,hb k A b) [N"0 I p s7 inri.sae n CUAk W /% vio,%7.no r.C O $/fd - ASfwWL-h M. Mb noo L.h.h mv. tS9c S Jr.ierocol. MEuwt. W.u.m o. 1,,w..z. d m.d g 3 ""~ " '# " * /U'c , n,
D ***" 8980*f22 Insp2ctor J. R. Cos+el/. Report flo. gz.o; Sccpe/ Module 927/o B,/f,1 low up 0" DOCUMENTS EXAMillED Pav:, nspa: s f,uings 4 1 2 TITLE / SUBJECT 3 I 8 h4 CAR f-36 n, Ja,; m Rrmosi on Plne Csp,,,al Del :la r/n}>9 r..a oi -,,..cy $l4l24 2 8 TE Ball, lim do. 2 9 -81 A Supele meal h. 29-otA J. fa v:n a u s /, I eD u,1: f r f:-- of TL Mail 1:. 99-of fgo:p -raf forC:e:raesas T rt. e Eau,vsn L I Clae : 1E Q ual:C:r li Of Asea Sal
- 1 L isa s 3
8 TE Bollalin do. 79 - of B fn v : ra a,,a ~ l.1 Ou.I:Z:e 4:. of lll4 /Bn C l> < < TE E a s:n.- r + '91 - <sy. als 4-l13l81 4-8 M C A R. L-36 Rev: sed F 'n.1 R-y.<1 on 7 dol:t, La 1 Diner,s. ~ C 8 M CA R 1 - SC rn la rl~ Re orl 6a '?;l F Cofras:d 4Ive a C/wl9s 4,, s - s La m a, SI-a On+ <:e O.1:- - U ili I L1 1. 4 8 MCA R SC N'r n, ) Pensel 4,a s n ur L aea 7:f o / Sol,- :1 L Iva 1/2 3l10 f a s I. H 4,*o s Des l<. 7 8 wAsa 1-SC &ls ed finNI Rrpo<& os P Isl C le !d 3l3 t,l?) Valse s L fa L - p I,1 1 .To r a :e - sn Document Types: Columns: 1. Drawing 5. Purchas Order 1. Sequential item Number 2. Specification 6. Internal Memo 2. Type of Docur ent 3. Procedure 7. Letter 3. Date of Document 4. QA Manual 8. Other (Specify-if necessary) 4. Revision (If applicable)
Docket flo.9ssaarz.1 Insp1ctor ]. R. lo 5 } eye Report flo. 81.or Sccpe/ Module 92 7 o / B /F,//,w Of DOCUMEffTS EXAMIffED on Prev lra s T nsfe.ile a findkgs 4 1 2 TITLE / SUBJECT 3 8 8 [ [ B ullenlin ll i4-1+ Seis m e k al a,s f, < As - Ba:)& ils - thh4 y L lel, Ral I.) P,a:e a, K,. Jaa s w lJL 2ev:t Jon 1 1-S.,,,1 ~.h 9 6 tt B att,);. 11,.,q-of En vivu,,,c sL I on.1 :f:,. l;.., nr 2./ehe Clu s if E<v:ws + la A SfPD Ta c t <o e l-lo 3 -19 .I n t FR, Pa el 11, Ro,n avF:n, ni 3/9- ? L 4-Drfrels - - el Hanea-pl:- m er s iI 3
- Nuclea, Osal;h A s so ra.aa M -.I o ualit. Assur.na.
Pal:e- +/osle v 4-pn;y Ca ha1 PeaeeJa<es (<aa:. E d. l.,, O l1 3 QADP C-2 o De s:.. De C: :. e-nn d A s, I., s : s s g a l3 3 E D P - 4. la $~ Desia. L C:e:aae-Pro ce s s ; ma 4lal 14-O I4 3 M E D - 4. 6 T-a l i;em 1)r$,; u ry Peacess:.. Io,in ole r 4-IK 8 Dalie sen ey 2,osef Ha_ At 31 l'ind %psA Unare,,},Ur 1/2.8lst i Ul;li,_.t:sa, Vollm s L fro; u Rel Ird EluFvle I f;ala wm i-Document Types: Columns: 1. Drawing 5. Purchas Order 1. Sequential Item Number 2. Specification 6. Internal Memo 2. Type of Document 3. Procedure 7. Letter 3. Date of Document 4. QA Manual 8. Other (Specify-if necessary) 4. Revision (If applicable)
D cket flo. 9990s.fn Inspector _l R. Co s /eI/o Report 110. g2.o, Scope / Module 38992/3BCD DOCUMENTS EXAMIfiED 1 2 TITLE / SUBJECT 3 4 I 3 ED P-4.+ 9 Pe,3gh fo r,: t : e +;o s e Ch, /14 2 2 3 E D P-4 fr Projae F M Fe<:-) R<< a:<, No s < r zl1 h, 3 3 3 CDP-4.fB name:C in3 And Rav;rw:= - d.,;., t :r e E5 :,,<:-- 1tls,h, 3 y Aad Coal:I-V<<:1:r 2:en Dacou. #,J aa 4-3 fD>-
- 4. f. 4 hv:rN of So,a,nt.,<
Aud: 1. Cuw. ire,, Aa 1 11.l1tl9G- -.3 Gr o e e Man }2eaaeks Spee;f:aaI: b ai Sa,,al:,, 0 auf:t A naa a,. C~/isl,, 1 C 3 fDP - 6.10 y Pr- - <- 2, - u : <- -.. h 3 ED P-6. II Svalun hin of $ay,a l:- < aa.Ilt A s s uva n er r/n),, o y P<sua a < ~1 8 asal:1 far.)v,:rl. u a 1o1 Nula.. V, Is,., &lrfl91 7 sp.1 (px) de An a La Da r1:-- V la, f.. 8 A OSR Ha. A G 8:n/ a :r I S4,* eld px. E.,:.,,a:,u t~a d&lns d i J J tr/1o,/n> 9 8 osR da. 22 - Service stao,< P., <, a-y.s- <> r le, P.in n t. to 8 Pro.t ud f: I A %,.,.1: a a
- e. s 1L,. R.,.<> (p r o. s >2 ) da 3./r./e1 1
Hulcar Serv;ee. Pmps, gayward fyler Pump C, Document Types: Columns: 1. Drawing 5. Purchas Order 1. Sequential Item Number 2. Specification 6. Internal Memo 2. Type of Document 3. Procedure 7. Letter 3. Date of Document 4. QA Manual 8. Other (Specify-if necessary) 4. Revision (If applicable)
D chet Ho. 99900f2r Insp:ctor J R. (o s /e //, Report flo. n1.o; Sccpe/ Module 58 9 92,/3 s $93 DOCUMENTS EXAMIllED 4 1 2 TITLE / SUBJECT 3 1I 8 Mi4re;. I Ry,,: ;Ji. sia. is err-a - s,r (c), Pv <e L a z e nf ll14l9/ I 2-Pusrae 7,, d D a ,1 +l13l f 2-26 I2 4-Hapard Tvlar Pa,., - r. p y Qo.llty A <>,< .,a, Maavas 13 4 Anek,< D. < t:.. a a.I: 4. A s s u rs re_ Manuat 1/1/92. D /4 8 faad:re Oua ll,, hvoa r Go la l aa ba <4 A., el.,, Da rla.. 3/t &In z.. / J W 2 E II dain L. 1[ B S.,, a l : ~ q a-llty P< >3 <a wro la I a s,- J A,y,aa L 3/t c,)r1. fu lor Idi 8 Nair<;ai kraurs I:,a Aln. 108KC-c - 140(0), Gav:ee Waler 2lf/61 9 [m1 Ar {l vvalv ve I9 8 Ma la <: I L o:s:4-irs As-tOBCC-J-Ill(O), Enviven menial 8l8l80 i y Qual (l cal an L4 far Cla ss IE Elrel-r:e hfal.,la F .a h luo A elualm e s nd faa 4 >l Ma L les 1B 8 hfa le <lel Rea aislF;ew //o. lo B C C J - fa o l (O), Alurira r 7lz4/81 1o $rea:er t % +r>I Va fee n 1/15.l81 8 IB 8 Maire.I 2,,.,: < : J :a., Ms. to o r t - M. 1o7 fo. 1, E m.an a 1** nle s Asd A cco-o!.4aas, sa;, ;e 44 ,<y r 9 Document Types: Columns: 1. Drawing 5. Purchas Order 1. Sequential Item Number 2. Specification 6. Internal Memo 2. Type of Document 3. Procedure 7. Letter 3. Date of Document 4. QA Manual 8. Other (Specify-if necessary) 4. Revision (If applicable)
D det H.ON#f22 Inspector J. R. Co s be l/ o Report flo. g2.oj Sccpe/ Module 3 8 S 9 2 /JsS9 3 DOCUMENTS EXAMINED 1 2 TITLE / SUBJECT 3 4 I -d. z1/9 / 20 8 So col le a On all1,, Pear. < bd;I % ael Cav e< x 1-h 6. au i 3 Enc Jl 8 fu.n,al;-r O. ul:t,. Pras,en Aud;4 M.aal Annasic-a A *r r;ller 4 }f/21 Co. [a e. 22 8 Cu,a,s I n'e < 6.NI:1, Pru,.ran. A.,d; J R,oa.4 Gen,, ) Eleti ete i 2,l1n.!B1 -~ Ca. Do'sivib el;na fav;p.erni Dlv. 23 8 San.a l:er
- o. u,1: L,.
Pen n, a _ A J:1 Raan,4 Gr.ve< sa, era, 9/Is.lar a <y 1 A,
- f. e.
14 8 fu a,1:, c Qs.1ll,,
- Proar, L 1:1-RroaaJ W, w n J L. /,a i// s/s t n-i s
e hd A n [a. 1 2r 8 Sv.a 1: < D.> l:1,. Pr-a-Aud:J Reanas Px E na:a seria, as}s*/v/ s a s Ca. f o}}DI 26 8 L,,. I:, < Evala.1: a Rev:aw Reparl Mess p. M u ut.alue y en. >wlz4/no 2.i 8 fayy, e s au l., I:a.a R, u.*, o Rry,<F flay ~1 T 1,< Pa y r. I y 36 8 ss. 1:r< Evala l. Review D---<l PM E - ln,- :-- C. T/zi n s 19 8
- f... s s.-
Ev lu 1:.. Reviae (Neu r+ ta d s > <,*. I s.h +/s 1 L. as av s C* nitol D o* vision Document Types: Columns: 1. Drawing 5. Purchas Order 1. Sequential Item Number 2. Specifica tion 6. Internal Memo 2. Type of Document 3. Procedure 7. Letter 3. Date of Document 4. QA Manual 8. Other (Specify-if necessary) 4. Revision (If applicable)
OUC * "#* M90dO2 Inspector J. R. Cas fe//o Report flo. e1.or Sccpe/ Modula 38 OS 2/38 99.3 DOCUMENTS EXAMIfiED 4 1 2 TITLE / SUBJECT 3 30 8 %.,1te < d, u,1;i,. Paa<-- Aal:1 Reso <4 L a. tre < Ta J., d < : l G lasI >l/6/B ;L i s Divistan / 3i B fa n n);e a Pe<f.<~anaa Eva lu l -s 2 par + PS 0 -2 t 3 Hyw1 7l3 R G 1 Ii 1*y Ie< Pany en 32. 8 S py er Pa s /- < - - a e e Evala a llu Reya e 4 PM Ema;,,s.a1:. Cs. 3lflB 2-. It
- 33 8
rapp t:aa Pr e t > <. a r fu lu I:-- L,.. a t Maysl:a g r J.s 41;.1 tolzr}ns C a J a, } D a:n la., 3+ 8 L,, an, a O.,I I Pv-a v. - Es. ru. I:. R ey m e I-Px f. 8l6lBI y Co. & hr}s 1 3C 8 So,ays:s < Os,Ilt Pe y - Ev lu I.*a La eI u,3a,s:,a y En J a r ie:.1 c la 1 Diuli in a Columns: Document Types: 1. Drawing 5. Purchas Order 1. Sequential Item Number l ^ 2. Specification 6. Internal Memo 2. Type of Document 3. Date of Document 3. Procedure 7. Letter 4. Revision (If applicable. 4. QA Manual 8. Other (Specify-if necessary)
82-O/ ~ B-1 R v. 3-12-75 ATTENDANCE LIST COMPANY: Beck & / P,s, (,<, / 5FPD j -DOCKET NO. 9 99 00.5 22 a 4,/JJ/82. Date: l Pre-Inspection Conference @lbst Inspection Confe(6nce (Please NAME (Please Print) TITLE (Please Print) ORGANIZATION Print)- J. R. Cos tello P<;uip.) kspa w usNac R-tv h.fU l,hcK l/&r? dw. 6?// & cs/,'Cl f / .Y,3 C s,, },,h s tLJ.2. r?,?,' D -/ 4 % l- // [I S /. /k9M6C Mn f..hapuM t,%u r y brwi% 5lb. /lntM2m BPC MGY o F G A Zsc+f.rc VK.E 1e \\\\ e % a w C n n1 w. h n - + n a lh b 4%\\ ^ L. 3, Anot=asw Smv of &E BnLM fM dumd )[x, -p Z/9,w foQ ,jk<new a f bl&&M QA M&t ficJ& TS $@M . Q. F Gou te;,dR. Co.dv. (P.ed. kg r. 9FPD heau.rsc.- ' D 1 i-\\ a n. u i c ' ' Lev. E os.Ao% c L4 e c a T e t. j - e. M c>o h M. QAe - bca LM9 c s n l F i i _}}