ML20054E566
| ML20054E566 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Dresden  |
| Issue date: | 06/04/1982 |
| From: | Miller W NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM) |
| To: | Delgeorge L COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8206110367 | |
| Download: ML20054E566 (2) | |
Text
-
UUN 4 1982 Docket No. 50-10 e-m
?
g pc CW...co g
Commonwealth Edison Company g M 193F 1 f nygg g*n g" s ATTN: Mr. L. O. DelGeorge g
3 Director of Nuclear Licensing P.O. Box 767
?.
Chicago, Illinois 60690 4'
W tu Gentlemen:
i
~
By letter dated October 29, 1981, you remitted a requested Class II fee of $1,200 for your February 17, 1981 application for extension of imple-mentation dates for fire protection modifications for Dresden Unit No.1 which was approved pursuant to 10 CFR 50.48(d). Your letter also requested clarification of what constitutes an NRC " evaluation" of the basis for relief because there appears to some inconsistency in NRC's policy in that we say exemptions pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12 are not fee bearing unless an evaluation is required and 50.12 requires a " determination" of the acceptability of the request.
Generally an evaluation is not required for requests that are purely routine in nature or are of such an administrative nature that they involve little or no consideration from the standpoint of safety or environmental significance. Fees have been and will continue to be charged for requests such as yours dated February 17, 1981, which was approved pursuant to 10 CFR 50.48. Fees will not generally be charged when the situation is as l
described in item 2 below, even if an evaluation accompanies or is included j
in the relief / exemption because it is more than routine or administrative in nature. Our fee position is unchanged from what has been applied since l
10 CFR 170 was revised in March 1978 as addressed in Enclosure 7 to the i
fee guidance issued with our letter dated July 12, 1979. That fee position is sumarized below:
1.
Fees Applicable:
l Fees are required if an application is approved, even though submitted l
under 10 CFR 50.12, and i
(a) a license amendment is issued, or (b) the agency action requested is provided for in another part of the j
regulation (e.g., 50.48,50.55a(g),etc.),or (c) The request is denied by the USNRC.
- - c206110367 820604 i
PDR ADOCK 05000010 l
o F PDR s~o!
c'
- _c-m
.-c-esmauseammm i
Commonwealth Edison Company,JUN 4 1982 2.
lio Fees:
fio fees are required if an application is approved pursuant to 50.12 and no license amendment is issued or no other provision in the regulations suchas50.48and50.55(a)(g)isapplicable.
It is anticipated that a future revision to 10 CFR 170 will change the current fee schedule in a manner that would resolve any inconsistencies that appear to exist in the current rule and our policies associated with its administration. At such time as this is accomplished, your Company and others will have a period to coment on the proposed rule.
Sincere,1y, IEf;s4 C. J:en l':"esy, Jr.
Chet William.O. Miller, Chief i
License Fee Management Branch Office of Administration DISTRIBUTION:
l POR l
LPDR l
Docket File /
P0'Connor, ORB-5 t
HSmith, ORB-5 Rl1Diggs, LFMB LFMB Reactor File i
LFMB Pending Fee File LFMB R/F (2) l l
I'vk omah LFMfh D 4, LFM :ADM OELD,[
DL:0RB-5 L.FM.B.:
gh,-
loway,,, RFo,nn.kr,,
,,P0,',Connpf,,
,,h e,,1,
="* R 5lAll.82...
5&J.82.....
- l..\\l.82..
.klh l.82..
. l.. 82....
NRC FORM 318 0080) NRCM ONO OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
_