ML20054D545
| ML20054D545 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 04/20/1982 |
| From: | Shoemaker C NRC ATOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING APPEAL PANEL (ASLAP) |
| To: | GUARD |
| References | |
| ISSUANCES-OL, NUDOCS 8204230116 | |
| Download: ML20054D545 (2) | |
Text
'
i UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL BOARD
'82 f?P 21 A7 5' Administrative Judges:
Stephen F.
Eilperin, Chairman i
1 Dr. W.
Reed Johnson Dr. Reginald L. Gotchy ggWtv APgZ11981
)
In the Matter of
)
)
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
)
Docket Nos. 50-361 OL COMPANY ET AL.
)
50-362 OL
)
bllp,/,$
(San Onofre Nuclear Generating
)
g Station, Units 2 and 3)
)
)
d e'-
s
~
of g7 I I
93 Np?Sbc'?
ORDER April 20, 1982 0%>
/
g A./
TC On March 1, 1982, intervenors' Guard and Carstens,'4".
et al.,
(Guard) submitted an untimely brief to us.
On March 5, we entered an order that the brief was to be con-sidered lodged, but would not be filed until receipt and disposition of a motion comporting with Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 2.
That section calls upon parties to our pro-ceedings to comply strictly with the time limits for filing briefs set forth in the rules of practice.
The section goes on to provide-(id, at (3)):
Absent a showing of extraordinary and unan-ticipated circumstances, motions for [exten-sions] of time must be received by the Appeal D
1)$
t e
b F204230116 820420 PDR ADOCK 05000361 0
,n.
- Board at least 1 day prior to the date upon which the document in question is then due for filing.
In no circumstances will a document be accepted by the Appeal Board on an untimely basis unless it is accompanied by a motion for leave to file it out of time, which similarly must be founded upon extra-ordinary and unanticipated circumstances.
Exceptions and briefs which in form or con-tent are not in substantial compliance with the requirements imposed by the rules of practice are subject to being stricken.
The Guard intervenors have not responded to our March 5 order in any way whatever.
Adequate time for a response having plainly passed, their lodged brief is hereby stricken 1/
and their appeal dismissedT~
It is so ORDERED.
FOR THE APPEAL BOARD b.
hbM\\
C. JQn Shoemaker
~
Secretary to the Appeal Board
~~1/ We will conduct our usual sua sponte review (see Sacramento Municipal Utility District (Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station), ALAB-655, 14 NRC 799 (1981)) and still have pending for decision the stay motion and appeal on seismic issues filed by a different set of intervenors, taken from the Licensing Board's January 11, 1982 partial initial decision which authorized the issuance of a low-power operating license for San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 2.
.