ML20054D304

Requests Addl Info Re Specific Requirements of 10CFR73.21 for Which Delay in Implementation Requested,Detailed Statement of Reasons for Delay & Detailed Description of Compensatory Measures During Delay Period

ML20054D304
Person / Time
Site:	Trojan File:Portland General Electric icon.png
Issue date:	04/12/1982
From:	Clark R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Withers B PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC CO.
References
NUDOCS 8204220566
Download: ML20054D304 (4)

Text

-

i

-t

}C /1)>OS APR 121982 Docket No. 50-344 G

Mr. Bart D. Withers Vice President Nuclear

1. s Portland General Electric Company e" 4$

ND 121 S. W. Salmon Street 8

c1 j, Portland, Oregon 97204 9-4

,3 (c

ft -

/ [e 387 9

Dear Mr. Withers:

O f,

This is in response to your letter of January 18,. ;2 in whic you requested a 6-month extension of time-until July 20,1982-to imphaentm? /

all aspects of 10 CFR 73.21. " Requirements for the protection of s'afeb. /

guards information."

Your request is not sufficiently specific or complete for us to reach a determination in this matter. To dispose of your request, we will require additional infomation as follows:

a.

an identification of the specific reoutrements of the regulation for which a delay in implementation is requested, and b.

a detailed statement of the reasons for the delay in implementation of 10 CFR 73.21, and c.

a detailed description of compensatory measures to be employed during the delay period.

The information provided must be sufficiently complete so as to enable us to make the requisite findings of 10 CFR 73.5, " Specific exemptions," since your request for an " extension" is, in fact, a request for an exemption from Section 73.21.

Since exemptions form the regulations cannot be obtained by the unilateral action of a licensee, you are not currently exempted from compliance with 10 CFR 73.21.

The information requested in this letter affects fewer than ten respondents; therefore OMB clearance is not required under P.I.96-511 Sincerely.

Origind !gned by h

Robert A. CN k Robert A. Clark, Chief r'

Operating Reactors Branch #3 d '

• see previous concurrence Division of Licensjnpfff E.p:,j.,.....

.N.........hIL:bRB8.3..M b.....

omei,

,....see.. neat.,ege...........

..P,,y,, if,t,z e,r,,,,,

TrmmeJJfdq......RAClar.k...

TMNoyak,,,,,,

suam.e >

.H.h.82,,,,,,,,,4jd,,,j,g,g,,,,,,,,,,,, 4/9/

/82 4/,$,s2.,,,,,

e20422o566 e20412 i

f l

PDR ADOCK 05000344 1

F PDR OFFICIAL RECORD COPY usa m m m.eo

s Docket No. 50-344 Mr. Bart D. Withers Vice President Nuclear Portland General Electric Company 121 S. W. Salmon Street Portland, Oregon 97204

Dear Mr. Withers:

This is in response to your letter of January 18, 1982 in which you requested a 6-month extension of time-until July 20, 1982-to implement all aspects of 10 CFR 73.?1, " Requirements for the protection of safeguards information."

Your request is not sufficiently specific or complete for us to reach a i

determination in this matter. To dispose of your request, we will require additional information as foUows:

a.

an identification of the specific requirements of the regulation for which a delay in implementation is requested, and b,

a detailed statement of the reasons for the delay in implementation of 10 CFR 73.21, and c.

a detailed description of compensatory measures to be employed during the delay period.

The information provided must be sufficiently complete so as to enable us to make the requisite findings of 10 CFR 73.51, " Specific exemptions " since your request for an " extension" is, in fast, a request for an exemption from Section 73.21.

Exemptions from the regulations cannot be obtained by the unilateral action of the licensee as you suggest in the closing paragraph of your letter of January 18, 1982. You should noteethat the new 10 CFR 73.21 was published in the Federal Register on October 22, 1981 with an effective date of January 20, 1982. Your letter requesting relief was dated,just two days before the effective date of the new rule and was not received by the NRC in a time period that would allow any action on your request before the c effective date of the new rule. Thus, you are not currently exempted from compliance with 10 CFR 73.21.

omerp sunwuse >

~.... ~ ~ ~ ~

oue>

............ -. ~..

~ ~..... ~..

-. ~ -.. ~ -...

unc ronu ste oow ancu ouo OFFICIAL RECORD COPY -

usa m.ne m ea

O 2

The inferraation requested in this letter affects fewer than ten respon-dents; therefore OMS clearance is not required under P.L.96-511.

Sincerely, Robert A. Clark, Chief Operating Reactors Branch f3 Division of Licer. sing cc: See next page DISTRIBUTI0ti:

Docekt File flRC PDR L DPR fiSIC ORB #3 Rdg DEisenhut JHeltemes RAClark PMKreutzer-3 CTrammell OELD I&E ACRS-10 Gray File DKunze DKasun GMcCorkle EMcPeek JRMiller JGray jf f Sun 8.]' l -

I)as w V a" g>

l/7p ;

l o,,,ce >. 0Rs.t.a 0(v..

.0&l6a;.0 @liBB.f.3.:.0L...d! LD............. AQ:.QRO(..... 55P8:DL C7'rammell/.pn RAClark lJC, ray T. M..i.l.....k............

..#Nh....,,,,.,,.,..,....,.,.

PMKr zer cu ~ e>

. 3l.b'.82...

3 6.AYl.8 2.........

31...../.8 2..

.....M11.6.2..........l.'...).a 2............. !W8 omy l nac ronu sta no-soi nncu eno OFFICIAL RECORD COPY usom mi-mmo' 1

\\

I 1

~

,f C

i i

I

]

Portland General Electric Company i

cc: Multnemah County Library Social Science and Science Department 801 S.W. 10th Avenue Portland, Oregon 97205 Michael Malmros, Resident Inspector U. S. Nuciear Regulatory Commission Trojan Nuclear Plant P. O. Box 0 j

Rainier, Oregon 97048

(

Robert M. Hunt, Chairman i

Board of County Commissioners Columbia County St. Helens, Oregon 97501 r

i Donald W. Godard, Supervisor Siting and Regulation Oregon Department of Energy Labor and Industries Building Room 111 Salem, Oregon 97310 Regional Administrator I

i Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Reg'ica V Office of Executive Director for. Op6 rations 1450 Maria Lane, Suite 210 Walnut Creek, California s94596 4

g l

n i

/

t I

I

,