ML20054D203

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards IE Insp Rept 50-346/82-11 on 820315-17.No Noncompliance Noted
ML20054D203
Person / Time
Site: Davis Besse 
Issue date: 03/31/1982
From: Little W
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Crouse R
TOLEDO EDISON CO.
Shared Package
ML20054D204 List:
References
NUDOCS 8204220438
Download: ML20054D203 (2)


See also: IR 05000346/1982011

Text

I

l

I.

MAR 31 082

9

A

s?

og

Docket No. 50-346(DETP)

Q

,

  1. y

q

C.f ,y

9

'

Toledo Edison Company

NITN:

Mr. Richard P. Crouse

T

4

n

Vice President

";j

, ? " .4 ~5"

M

Nuclear

M'

Edison Plaza

X Ev

,W,

N'%' l

300 Madison Avenue

,

Toledo, OH 43652

7 ')

~

Gentlemen:

This refers to the routine safety inspection conducted by Mr. K. D. Ward of

this office on March 15-17, 1982, of activities at Davis-Besse Nuclear Power

Station, Unit 1, authorized by NRC Operating License No. NPF-3 and to the

discussion of our findings with Mr. C. Daf t and others at the conclusion of

the inspection.

The er. closed copy of our inspection report identifies areas examined during

the inspection. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective

examination of procedures and representative records, observations, and in-

terviews with personnel. As part of this inspection, we reviewed your

program and results related to inspections of thermal sleeves, gaps, and

welds in the safe end nozzle area on the makeup system. Our understanding

of your planned efforts in this area were documented in our Confirmation

of Action Letter dated March 11, 1982. No problems were identified and we

have no further questions in this area.

No items of noncompliance with NRC requirements were identified during the

course of this inspection.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy

of this letter and the enclosed inspection report will be placed in the

NRC's Public Document Room.

If this report contains any information

that you (or your contractors) believe to be exempt from disclosure under

10 CFR 9.5(a)(4), it is necessary that you (a) notify this office by tele-

phone within ten (10) days from the date of this letter of your intention

to file a request for withholding; and (b) submit within twenty-five (25)

days from the date of this letter a written application to this office

to withhold such information.

If your receipt of this letter has been

delayed such that less than seven (7) days are available for your review,

please notify this office promptly so that a new due date may be estab-

lished.

Consistent with Section 2.790(b)(1), any such application must

G204220430 020331

PDR ADOCK 05000346

T O'['3 [

G

PDR

L

I

.

'

.

,

.

Toledo Edison Company

2

,yA;( y y

be accompanied b,y an affidavit executed by the owner of the information

which identifies the document or part sought to be withheld, and which

contains a full statement of the reasons which are the bases for the

claim that the information should be withheld from public disclosure.

This section further requires the statement to address with specificity

the considerations listed in 10 CFR 2.790(b)(4). The information sought

to be withheld shall be incorporated as far as possible into a separate

part of the affidavit.

If we do not hear from you in this regard within

the specified periods noted above, a copy of this letter and the enclosed

inspection report will be placed in the Public Document Room.

We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.

Sincerely,

h/ p

W i J%

f

W. S. Little, Chief

Engineering Inspection Branch

Enclosure:

Inspection Report

No. 50-346/82-11(DETP)

cc w/ enc 1:

T. D. Murray, Station

Superintendent

DMB/ Document Control Desk (RIDS)

Resident Inspector, RIII

Harold W. Kohn, Power Siting

Commission

Helen W. Evans, State of Ohio

Robert M. Quillin, Ohio

Department of Health

RIII,

RIII

RIII

RI I

fard/so

DIY

%%

'$ g

lV

Dap)ielson

Nelson

L t

J/ J/fV

3&g

gy /d')

3/22/82

'

- _ _ _ _