ML20053E687

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Motion to Separate Applicant & NRC Witness Panels on Shoreham Opponents Coalition Contention 16 Re Clad Swelling & Flow Blockage.Both Applicant & NRC Oppose Contention But for Different Reasons
ML20053E687
Person / Time
Site: Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png
Issue date: 06/08/1982
From: Repka D
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD)
To:
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
Shared Package
ML20053E688 List:
References
ISSUANCES-OL, NUDOCS 8206090155
Download: ML20053E687 (1)


Text

..

06/08/82 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COPNISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of LON3 ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY

)

Docket No. 50-322 (0L)

)

(Shoreham Nuclear Power Station,

)

Unit 1)

)

NRC STAFF MOTION TO SEPARATE APPLICANT AND STAFF WITNESS PANELS ON S0C CONTENTION 16 The NRC Staff requests that the Board separate the Applicant and Staff witness panels on S0C Contention 16, related to clad swelling and flow blockage. The specific circumstances of this contention, rather than general objections, lead the Staff to request the separate panels.

As indicated in the prefiled testimony, both the Applicant and Staff oppose the assertions of the contention, but for different reasons.

Specifically, the Staff relies on a license condition requiring the Applicant to perfor$ an ECCS reanalysis for Shoreham's second cycle and beyond. The Applicant has taken the position that the reanalysis, and thus the license condition, is unnecessary. These distinctly different positions, in the opinion of the NRC Staff, justify separate witness panels for litigation of the issue.

Respectfully submitted, b

b-David A. Repka Counsel for NRC Staff Dated at Bethesda, Maryland ORinti;AL DggionA this 8th day of June, 1982.

Certified By /

8206090155 820608 PDR ADOCK 05000322 G

PDR

. _. _