ML20053D350
| ML20053D350 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Maine Yankee |
| Issue date: | 05/21/1982 |
| From: | Martin T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20053D349 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-309-82-06, 50-309-82-6, NUDOCS 8206040329 | |
| Download: ML20053D350 (2) | |
Text
.
APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company Docket No. 50-309 Maine Yankee Atomic Power Station License No. DPR-36 As a result of an inspection conducted on April 19-23, 1582, and in accordance with Enforcement Policy, 47 FR 9987 (March 9, 1982), the following violation was identified:
10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion VI, requires, in part, that measures be esta-blished to assure that changes to drawings affecting quality shall be reviewed for adequacy, approved for release by authorized personnel, and distributed to and used at the location where the prescribed activity is performed.
The Maine Yankee Operational Quality Assurance Program,Section II, requires conformance to the requirements of ANSI N45.2-1977, " Quality Assurance Program Requirements for Nuclear Facilities". ANSI N45.2-1977, paragraph 7, states in part, that procedures shall be established for control of drawings and their changes to preclude the possibility of the use of inappropriate drawings and that these procedures shall ensure that drawing changes are reviewed for adequacy and approved for release by authorized personnel.
Contrary to the above on April 20, 1982, controlled drawings located and used in the control room which affect quality contained interim changes which had not been reviewed for adequacy or approved by authorized personnel.
Additionally, plant procedures did not provide measures to assure that changes to drawings affecting quality were reviewed for adequacy and approved by authorized personnel to preclude the possible use of inappropriate drawings, in that:
For Drawing 11550-FM-96A, " Primary Sampling Systems Piping", valves PR-18, PR-19, and PR-20 were added to the drawing to show interface to the pressu-rizer system; and the positions of valves PS-9, PS-10, and PS-11 were changed on the drawing from " closed" to "open" and PS-7 from "open" to closed" without review for adequacy or proper approval; For Orawing 11550-FM-101B, " Miscellaneous Safety Systems Piping", the following valve number designations were changed on the drawing:
CH-119S to CH-1205, CH-120S to CH-119S, CH-122 to CH-121, and CH-121 to CH-122 without review for adequacy or proper approval; For Drawing 11550-FM-70A, " Main Steam Piping", the designation of MS-161 was changed to MS-M-161 to reflect an existing motor operator without review for adquacy or proper approval; 0FFICIAL RECORD COPY 8206040329 820521 PDR ADOCK 05000309 g
Appendix A 2
Plant procedure 0-01-2, " Document Revision", did.not establish a method by which changes to controlled drawings, as a result of identified discrepancies between as-built plant configuration and drawing configurations, are reviewed for adequacy and approved by authorized personnel; nor was a method esta-blished to assure that all other affected controlled drawings would be changed; and, Plant procedure 0-01-1, " Design Change /Alteratior.", did not establish a method by which interim changes to Control Room drawings, which occur as a result of design changes or plant alterations, were reviewed for adequacy or approved by authorized personnel. Additionally, the procedure did not establish a method as to how interim changes to Control Room drawings were to be made.
Drawing Changes denoted above are examples, further examples of changes to drawings affecting quality (e.g. drawings of safety class systems) are detailed in the attached inspection report.
This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company is hereby required to submit to this office, within thirty days of the date of this notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, including:
- 1) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved; 2) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations; and 3) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Under the authority of Section 182 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, this response shall be submitted under oath or affirmation.
Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending your response time.
The responses directed by this notice are not subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.
Dated MAY 21 193?
Thomas T. Martin, Chief, Division of Engineering and Technical Programs OFFICIAL RECORD COPY l
l L
.