ML20053B103

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Environ Protection Plan (Nonradiological) for Facility,App B to License DPR-76
ML20053B103
Person / Time
Site: Diablo Canyon, Arkansas Nuclear  Pacific Gas & Electric icon.png
Issue date: 09/30/1981
From:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
Shared Package
ML20053B102 List:
References
NUDOCS 8205280046
Download: ML20053B103 (10)


Text

-

.v.

i 7

APPENDIX ~B y

TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-76 DIABLO CANYON NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION UNIT 1 e

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY DOCKET N05. 50-J5 and 50-323 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PLAN (NON-RADIOLOGICAL)

September 1981 I

i I

82052ggo g W

?

DIABLO CANYON NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION UNIT 1 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PLAN (NON-RADIOLOGICAL)

'E TABLE 0F CONTENTS Section Page

1. 0 Objectives of the Environmental Protection Plan.......

1-1

. 2. 0 Environmental Protection Issues...............

2-1 2.1 Aquatic Issues 2-1 2.2 Terrestrial Issues 2-2 3.0 Consistency Requirements

'3-1 3.1 Plant Design and Operation...........'.....

3-1 3.2 Reporting Related to the NPDES Permits and State Certification.......................

3-2 3.3 Changes Required for Compliance with Other Environmental Regulations........................

3-2

4. 0 Environmental Conditions 4-1 4.1 Unusual or Important Environmental Events..........

4-1

1. 2 Enviror sr.tsi Ponitor ng i

4-1

5. 0 Acr.i ni strative Procedures..................

5-1 5.1 Review and Audit 5-1

5. 2 Records Retention.............

5-1

5. 3 Chances in Environmental Protection Plan 5-1 5.4 Plar.i r. sporting Recuirer.ents 5-1 e

f I

I I

7 1.0 Objectives of the Environmental Protection Plan The Environmental " Protection Plan (EPP) is to provide for protection of environmental values during construction and operation of the nuclear facility.

The principal objectives of the EPP are as follows:

9 (1) Verify that the plant is operated in an environmentally acceptable manner, as established by the FES and other NRC environmental impact assessments.

(2) Coordinate NRC requirements and maintain consistency with other Federal,

' State and local requirements for environmental protection.

(3)

Keep NRC informed of the environmental effects of facility construction and operation and of actions taken to control those effects.

Environmental concerns identified in the FES which relate to water quality matters are regulated by way of the licensee's NPDES permit.

S e

~

1-1

-2

o 2.0 Environmental Protection Issues The staff identified in the FES-OL dated May 1973 and FES-OL Addendum, dated May 1976 certain environmental issues which required study or license con-ditions to resolve environmental concerns and to assure adequate protection of the environment during the operation of the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Generating

'S Station Units 1 and 2.

On June 12, 1978, the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board issued a partial initial decision in favor of licansing Diablo Canyon

' Units 1 and 2 subject to certain conditions for the protection of the environ-ment.

The conditions needed to resolve these concerns resulting from the environmental impact review are as follows:

' 2.1 Aquatic Issues c

Specific aquatic issues raised by the staff or the hearing board were:

(1) The need to control the release of chlorine and study its effects on marine life (FES-0L Sections 3.5, 5.3, 6.3, 12.3, and 13.3)

(2). The need to study the amount, persistence, and stabilization of foam generated by the discharge of cooling water (FES-OL Addendum Section 5.2, ASLB, p. 97)

(3) The need to confirm that thermal mixing and current p,.tterns occur as predicted.and.that heat treatment is limited.

(FES-OL Section 3.3 and 5.3: Adderdim Secticos 3.3 and 6.0)

(4) The continuation of preoperational monitoring studies on intertidal and subtidal biota particularly bull kelp and abalone during operation.

(FES-OL Sections 3.5 and 6.0; Addendum Section 5.3 a:LB, p. 9o)

(5) ine need for special studies to document levels of intake entraincent en eggs and larvae of fish and abalone and impingement on fish and i r.v e rte brate s.

(FES-OL Sections 5.3 and 6.2; Aodendum Sections 5.3 and

5. : ASLB p. 97) e Aquatic issues are now addressed by the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, thermal effects study and Section 316(b) demonstration requirements i

contained in the NPDES permit issued by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board.

The NPDE5 permit includes applicable requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Ocean Plan

  • and Thermal Plan.**

The NRC will rely on this agency for resolution of the issues involving water quality and aquatic biota.

"" Ocean Plan" is an abbreviation for the Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters of California.

    • " Thermal Plan" is an abbreviation for the Water Quality Control Plan for Control of Temperature in the Coastal and Interstate Waters and Enclosed Bays and Estuaries of California.

2-1

r

]

2.2 Terrestrial Issues Sps'cific terrestrial issues raised by the sta'ff or the hearing board were:

(1) A program to assure erosion control within the transmission line corridor.

(FES-OL Addendum Section 4'.2.2)

This requirement shall be satisfied as follows:

Conditions and monitoring requirements fdr the control of erosion

'5 within the transmission line right-of-way are specified by the California Public Utilities Decision No. 79726.

Nonconformance with the positions of Decision No. 79726 shall be reported to the NRC.

(2)' The need for controlled use of herbicides on transmission rights-of-way if they are used.

(FES-OL, Section 5.3.1) c (3) The need to preserve a shell midden of archeological significance on the Diablo Canyon Plant site and provide access to the site by local Indians.

(ASLB Hearing Transcript, pp. 3424-3442 & pp. 3361-3369)

NRC requirements with regard to these terrestrial issues are specified in Subsection 4.2 of this EPP.

l e

2-2

l r-l

'3.0 Consistency Requirements 3.1 Plant De' sign and Operation The licensee may make changes in station design or operation or perform tests.

or experiments affecting the environment provided such changes, tests or g

experiments do not involve an unreviewed environmental question, and do not involve a change in the Environmental Protection Plan *.

Changes in plant pesign or operation or performance of tests or experiments which do not affect the environment are not subject to the requirements of this EPP.

Activities governed by Section 3.3 are nnt subject to the requirements of this section.

' B,efore engaging in unauthorized construction or operational activities which may affect the environment, the licensee shall prepare and record an environmental c

evaluation of such activity.

When the evaluation indicates that such activity involves an unreviewed environmental question, the licensee shall provide a written evaluation of such activities and obtain prior approval from the Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.

When such activity involves a change in the Environmental Protection Plan, such activity and change to the Environmental Protection P.lan may be implemented only in accordance with an appropriate license amendment as set forth in Section 5.3.

A proposed change, test or experiment shall'be deemed to involve an unreviewed environmental question if it concerns (1) a matter which may result in a significant increase in any adverse environmental impact previously evaluated in -the final environmental statenent (FES) es modified by staff's testimony to r.2 ;tz.ic Safet and Licensing Ecarc, supple. ents c the FE5. envirentental iT.;Ect appraisals, or in any decisions of the Atcmic Safety and Licensing Board; or (2) a significant change in effluents or power level [in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51.5(b)(2)] or (3) a mattcr not previously reviewed and evaluated in the documents specified in (1) of this Subsection. which may have a54 nificant adverse environmental itpact.

The licensee shall maintain records of chances in facility design or operation l

end cf tests and experiments carried out cursuant to this Sucsection.

These cen us snall include a written evaivatica whicn previce bases fer the deter-a mination that the change, test, or experiment does not involve an unreviewed environmental question nor constitute a decrease in the effectiveness of this EPP to meet the objectives specified in Section 1.0.

The licensee shall include as part of his Annual Environmental Operating Report (per Subsec-tion 5.4.1) brief descriptions, analyses, interpretations, and evaluations of such changes, tests and experiments.

^Tnis provision does not relieve the licensee of the requirements of 10 CFR 550.59.

3-1

r

\\ s.-

r 3.2 Reporting Related to the NPDES Permits and State Certification 4 Vi6Tations of the NPDES Permit or the State cdrtification (pursuant to Section 401 of the Clean Water Act) shall be reported to the NRC by submittal of copies of the reports required by the NPDES Permit or certifi, cation.

The licensee shall also provide the NRC with copies of the results of the following studies at the same time they are submitted to the permitting agency:

~

i)

Thermal effects study g

ii) Section 316(b) Demonstration Study Changes and additions to the NPDES Permit or the State certification shall be reported to the NRC within 30 days following the date the change is approved.

If a permit or certification, in part or in its entirety, is appealed and stayed, the NRC shall be notified within 30 days following the date the stay is granted.

The NRC shall be notified of ch2.ges to the effective NPDES Permit proposed by the licensee by providing NRC with a copy of the proposed change at the same time it is submitted to the permitting agency.

The licensee shall provide the NRC a copy of the application for renewal of the NPDES permit at the same time the application is submitted to the permitting agency.

3.3 Changes Required for Compliance with Other Environmental Regulations Changes in plant design or operation and performance of tests or experiments which are required to achieve compliance with other Federal, State, or local crvironmental regulations are not subject to the requirements of Section 3,,1.

O

~

e 3-2 w

r 4.0 Environmental Conditions 4.1 Unusual.or Important Environmental Events Any occurrence of an unusual or important event that indicates or could result in significant environmental' impact causally related to station oper

  • ation shall be recorded and promptly reported to the NRC within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> by

'?

telephone, telegraph, or facsimile transmissions followed by a written report within 30 days, as specified in Subsection 5.4.2.

The following are examples:

, excessive bird impaction events; onsite plant or animal disease outbreaks; mortality or unusual occurrence of any species protected by the Endangered Species Act of 1973; fish kills; increase in nuisance organisms or conditions; and unanticipated or emergency discharge of waste water or chemical substances.

N'o routine monitoring programs are required to implement this condition.

4.2 Environmental Monitoring 4.2.1 Herbicide Applications The.use of herbicides within the corridor rights-of-way associated with the station shall conform to the approved use of selected herbicides as registered by the Environmental Protection Agency and approved by State authorities and applied as directed by said authorities.

Reporting requirements shall apply only during the period of herbicide applications for those corridor richts-of-way associated with the station.

. I. 2 Fraservatica cf ; ~c.aeoicgical Rascurces Tsecuirerants The licensee shall avoid disturbances to the SLO-2 site in accordance with the Archaeological Resources Management Plan submitted to the NRC on April 7, 1980.

Should a disturbance of the SLO-2 site inconsistent with the allowable use of

.e site under the Archaeological Resources Management Plan be necessary tne licensee snail report the planned disturbance to the NRC in accordance with

__:section 5.4.2..

e The licensee shall develop a plan for controlled access by the Chumash Indian Tribe to the SLO-2 site for religious activities, and transmit the plan to appropriate tribal representatives for negotiation.

The plan shall provide for reasonable controlled access to the site, taking into account plant related security and public health and safety constraints.

A good-faith effort shall be demonstrated by the licensee to reach agreement with the Chumash Tribe on the plan within one year from the date of license issuance.

4-1

}

s-4 t

5.0 Administrative Prccedures 5.1 Review and Audit The licensee shall provide for review and audit of compliance with the Environmental Protection Plan.

The audits shall be conducted independently of the individual or groups responsible for performing the specific act,ivity.

A

'q description of the organization structure utilized to achieve the independent review and audit function and results of the audit activities shall be

, maintained and made available for inspection.

i 5.2 Records Retention Records and logs relative to the environmental aspects of plant operation shall be made and retained in a manner convenient for review and inspection.

c These records and logs shall be made available to NRC on request.

Records of modifications to plant structures, systems and components determined to potentially affect the continued protection o.f the environment shall be retained for the life of the plant.

All other records, data and logs relating to this EPP shall be retained for five years or, where applicable, in

~

accordance with the requirements of other agencies.

5.3 Changes in Environmental Protection Plan Request for change in the Environmental Protection Plan shall include an asiassment of the environmental impact of the proposed change and a s'upoorting sstift:t.icn.

Icplsmsr.E;icn of such changes ir the EFP sr.ali not ccmT.ence prior to NRC approval of the' proposed changes in the form of a license amend-ment incorporating the appropriate revision to the Environmental Protection Plan.

5. 4 Plant Reporting Eequirements

' utine Reports 5.4.1 An Annual Environmental Operating Report describing imolementaticn of this EPP for tts :revious year snall be submitted to tne.'<RC prior to May 1 of eacn e

year.

Tne initial report shall be submitted prior to May 1 of the year following issuance of the operating licease.

The period of the first report shall begin with the date of issuance of the operating license.

The report shall include summaries and analyses of the results of the environmental protection activities required by Subsection 4.2 of this Environ-mental Protection Plan for the report period, including a comparison with preoperational studies, operational controls (as appropriate), and previous non-radiological environmental monitoring reports, and an assessment of the observed impacts of the plant operation on the environment.

If harmful effects or evidence of trends towards irreversible damage to the environment are observed, the licensee shall provide a detailed analysis of the data and a proposed course of act, ion to ' alleviate the problem.

5-1 ad

The Annual Environmental Operating Report shall also include:

(a)~A' list of EPP noncompliances and the corrbctive actions taken to remedy them.

(b) A list of all. changes in station design or operation, tests, and experiments made in accordance with Subsection 3.1 which involved a potentially significant unreviewed environmental issue.

(c) A list of nonroutine reports submitted in accordance with Subsection 5.4.2.

-h In the event that some results are not available by the report due date, the teport shall be submitted noting and explaining the missing results.

The missing data shall be submitted as soon as possible in a supplementary report.

, 5.4.2 Nonroutine Reports

'A written report shall be submitted to the NRC within 30 days of occurrence of nonroutine event.

The report shall (a) describe, analyze, and evaluate the event, including extent and magnitude of the impact and plant operating characteristics, (b) describe the probable cause of the event, (c) indicate,

the action taken to correct the reported event, (d) indicate the corrective action taken to preclude repetition of the event and to prevent similar occurrences involving similar components or systems, and (e) indicate the agencies notified and their preliminary responses.

Events reportable under this subsection which also require reports to other Federal, State or local agencies shall be reported in accordance with those reporting requirements in lieu of the requirements of this subsection.

The I P.C shall be oroviced a cocy of such report at the sne tine it 4 r s6itted Ic U6

  • "EF f.C E.~.cy.

$ j'W g

. g

.aw M meme i

E 5-2

.