ML20053A856
| ML20053A856 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Saint Lucie  |
| Issue date: | 03/26/1982 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20053A842 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-335-82-03, 50-335-82-3, NUDOCS 8205270358 | |
| Download: ML20053A856 (2) | |
Text
.
. =. _ -
l 1
i APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Florida Power and Light Company Docket No. 50-335 St. Lucie 1 License No. DPR-67 i
l As a result of the inspection conducted on February 16-19, 1982, and in accord-ance with the Interim Enforcement Policy, 45 FR 66754 (October 7, 1980), the following violations were identified.
J A.
Technical Specification 6.8.1 requires written procedures to be implemented covering areas identified in Appendix "A"
1 Appendix "A",Section I.5 requires general procedures for the control of maintenance, repair, replacement, and modification. Administrative Proce-dure (AP) 0010432, Plant Work Orders, Revision 17, addresses this require-ment.
Contrary to the above, AP0010432 was not implemented in 9 out of 19 plant work orders (PW0s) selected for review as listed below:
1.
Work was initiated on PW0s 2608, 2658, 3325, and 3631 without' being signed by the maintenance supervisor as required by paragraph 8.4.
l 2.
The lubricant used to complete PWO 1800 was not recorded as required by the procedure to verify that the correct lubricant was actually used.
]
3.
PWO 3643 was not revised to reflect that the emergency diesel cylinder disassembly called for in the work description was not considered necessary by the mechanic and was not completed. Approval was not obtained to deviate from the stated requirements.
4.
The requirement in PWO 3631 to apply a specific bolt torque when installing pressurizer code safety valves was not met in that a slug-ging wrench and sledge hammer were used to tighten the flange bolts.
The change to the maintenance procedure was not approved prior to making this revision.
Even though not determined during the instal-lation, a specific torque value was signed off in a QC hold point.
5.
After changing the oil. PW0s 1772, 1785, and 1800 required running the l
equipment to obtain bearing temperatures as verification that the proper oil had been used. Without prior approval, operators running the test deleted the requirement to obtain bearing temperatures because l
the routine surveillance test used to operate the equipment did not 4
require bearing temperature measurement except during the month of June.
0 N
@0527
Florida Power and Light Company 2
Docket No. 50-335 St. Lucie 1 License No. DPR-67 6.
On PWO 2652, verification of Technical Specifications was not signed by an on-shift SR0 as required by a procedure attached to the PWO.
This is a Severity Level V Violation (Supplement I.).
)
B.
'10 CFR 50 Appendix B Criterion III and the accepted QA Program TQR 3.0, Design Control, require that measures be established to assure that applic-able regulatory requirements and the design basis are correctly translated into specifications, drawings, procedures, and instructions and that these measures shall include provisions to assure that appropriate quality stand-ards are specified and that deviations from such standards are controlled.
2 Contrary to the above, deviations from appropriate quality standards were not controlled in that a broken fastener on safety injection system i
restraint SI-971-6234 was repaired in accordance with Plant Work Order (PWO) 3488 dated October 16, 1982. This work required removal of a broken fastener and replacement with a 3/4" X 2 3/4" stud and double nut arrange-ment although the drawing (SI-971-6234-2) specifies a 3/4" X 13/4" long machine bolt.
In addition, a procedure was not provided to perform this i
repair and a Quality Control inspector reviewed the PWO and approved the work description.
4 This is a Severity Level V Violation (Supplement I).
Pursuant to the' provisions of 10 CFR 2.2Li, you are hereby required to submit to this office within thirty days of the date of this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, including: (1) admission or denial of the alleged viola-tion; (2) the reasons for the violation if admitted; (3) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved; (4) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations; and (5) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Consideration may be given to extending your response time for good i
cause shown.
i MAR 2 61982 l
Date:
i f
.I i w mm -,
m--e3r-,e--m----
,-re-
- - - - - - -, - - ~ - - -. - - - - -.
-,,, - - - ~ < - - - -, - - - - - - -.
-+w-
--