ML20053A834
| ML20053A834 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Beaver Valley |
| Issue date: | 05/11/1982 |
| From: | Starostecki R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20053A831 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-334-82-08, 50-334-82-8, NUDOCS 8205270335 | |
| Download: ML20053A834 (1) | |
Text
._
APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Duquesne Light Company Docket / License: 50-334/DPR-66 Beaver Valley Power Station Unit 1 During the inspection on March 20 - April 26,1982, and in accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy.10CFR2 Appendix C '47FR9987. March 9,1982), the follow-ing violation was identified:
Amendment 18 to Facility License DPR-66, issued June 6,1979, requires imple-mentation of an Operations Quality Assurance Plan for fire protection acti-i vities, including testing and administrative controls. The BVPS Operations Quality Assurance Plan, Appendix C, Fire Protection, Revision 1, requires that inspections and testing of the Fire Protection Systems be accomplished in accordance with documented instructions and procedures. The BVPS Operat-ing Manual (OM) Section 1.55A, Periodic Checks and Operating Surveillance.
Operating Surveillance Test (OST) 1.33.15, Fire Extinguisher Inspection, Issue 1. Revision 35, establishes monthly inspections of portable fire equip-ment in accordance with National Fire Protection Association Pamphlet 10.
OM Section 1.55A.1, Sumary Description, Issue 1, Revision 1 defines monthly test frequency as at least once per 31 days with a maximum allowable exten-sion not to exceed 25% of the surveillance interval.
Contrary to the above, on April 15,1982, OST 1.33.15 had not been perfomed since February 22, 1982, exceeding the maximum pemissible interval.
This is a Severity Level V Violation (Supplement I).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10CFR2.201 Duquesne Light Company is hereby required to submit to this office within thirty days of the date of this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, including:
(1) corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved, (2) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations, and (3) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Under the authority of Section 182 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, this response shall be submitted under oath or affimation. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.
Date NAY l 1 1982 original sian a svi Richard W. Starostecki, Director Division of Project and Resident Programs 1
0FFICIAL RECORD COPY
- -.. -. - ~. -
-. - ~ - - -
- - - - - -