ML20052E701
| ML20052E701 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Midland |
| Issue date: | 04/21/1982 |
| From: | Norelius C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20052E695 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-329-82-06, 50-329-82-6, 50-330-82-06, 50-330-82-6, NUDOCS 8205110362 | |
| Download: ML20052E701 (2) | |
Text
.
Appendix NOTICE OF VIOLATION Consumers Power Company Docket No. 50-329 Docket No. 50-330 As a result of the inspection conducted on March 17-19, 1982, and in accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy, 47 FR 9987 (March 9, 1982),
the following violations were identified:
1.
10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion II states, in part, "The quality assurance program shall provide control over activities affecting the quality of the identified structures, systems, and components, to an extent consistent with their importance to safety. Activities affecting quality shall be accomplished under suitably controlled conditions."
Consumers Power Company Quality Assurance Program Policy No. 2, Revision 11, Paragraph 1.0 states, in part, "The Quality Assurance Program assures that activities affecting quality are accomplished by use of appropriate equipment and under suitable environmental conditions. The program establishes the requirements for special controls, processes, test equipment..."
Contrary to the above, the Midland Project Quality Assurance Department has not adequately established a Quality Assurance Pro-gram which provides controls over the installation of underpinning instrumentation. This condition is exemplified by the installation of underpinning instrumentation cables without documented procedures, approved drawings, or the development and implementation of inspection and audit requirements.
This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement II).
2.
10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion X states, in part, "A program for inspection activities affecting quality shall be established and executed by or for the organization performing the activity to verify conformance with the documented instructions, procedures, and drawings for accomplishing the activity."
820S110362 820426 PDR ADOCK 05000329 0
Appendix 2
Consumers Power Company Quality Assurance Program Policy No. 10, Revision 11, Paragraph 1.0 states, in part, " Inspection and surveil-lance are performed to assure that activities affecting quality comply with documented instructions, design documents..."
Contrary to the above, licensee construction quality control in-spections performed during the period of October 9, 1978 and July 21, 1981 failed to verify conformance of cable pulling activities with documented instructions as follows:
a.
Paragraph 2.6 of Project Quality Control Instruction E-4.0 states, in part, " Verify that the cable is correctly installed in the identified vias as specified on the cable pull card."
Fifty-five Class 1E cables were inspected and accepted even though the cables were not routed in accordance with the cable pull cards.
b.
Paragraph 2.1 of Project Quality Control Instruction E-4.0 states, in part, " Verify that the cable to be installed...is identified by a reel number which incorporates the purchase order number and the manufacturer's reel number." Sixty-six Class 1E cables were inspected and accepted even though non-conforming cable reel numbers were recorded on inspection records.
This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement II).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, you are required to submit to this office within thirty days of the date of this Notice a written state-ment or explanation in reply, including for each item of noncompliance:
(1) corrective action taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective action to be taken to avoid further noncompliance; and (3) the date when full com-pliance will be achieved. Consideration may be given to extending your response time for good cause shown.
It0t iginal signed by C.E. Ibrolic15 Dated' C. E. Norelius, Director Division of Engineering and Technical Programs
- _.. - _ -