ML20052D604

Minutes of ACRS Subcommittee on Palo Verde 811123-24 Meeting in Phoenix,Az Re Review of Util Application for OL

ML20052D604
Person / Time
Site:	Palo Verde
Issue date:	01/05/1982
From:	Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards
To:	Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards
References
ACRS-1927, NUDOCS 8205060623
Download: ML20052D604 (40)

Text

WOTMOV t

e f,$, j.i w, _

y f.t

&L 6 &W r

t N~b7 I

j

. ' 4 f'!, '

!j

3[:

DATE ISSUED:

1/5/82 N

Mo', \\fn jMQ,,

8

[ i{

3 MINUTES

'f j

t I

ACRSSUBCOMMITTEEONPALOVERDE[

Y e3 h

PHOENIX, ARIZONA.

j i

4 g3 c

k

'I n'

k" t

,r J! # {

1

.I },

?,

b, y;.;. ' g i,

NTRODUCTION 9,

~

3 s

p

~

R q

j' { y, fhe ACRS Subcommittee on Palo Verde held a meeting on Novem er 23-24, 1981, h,b, n Phoenix, Arizona. The purpose of the meeting was to review the Arizona

~

e

- y

.,ublic Service Company application for a license to operate the three units t

y R

i it the Palo Verde station.

Notice of this meeting was published in the federal Register on Friday, N.ovember 6 and Friday, November 13,1981 (See 6

ttachment 1).

A meeting schedule, list of attendees, selected handouts

• rom the meeting, and a list of documents provided to the Subcommittee are

>C g

g f

ld neluded as Attachments 2-5.

Copies of all the meeting handouts are in the M

e

.k i p *a

,] ('g is

,ti

,11 CRS files.

There was one statement by a member of the public, I;p I, j 27 jis. Sharon Harrington.

'I

,$f bf

,I(

hTTENDEES j$

I TACRS Principal Speakers t 3. }. y ',,,y {ti. Bender, Chaiman J. Kerrigan, NRC Staff h

1. Ebersole, Member E. Van Brunt, Arizona Public Service Co.

l

f IN. Mathis, Member i

f . Shewmon, Member i.(b ,t C. Siess, Member i J. Arnold, Consultant F. Binford, Consultant ij y fi kf I. Catton, Consultant G. Quittschreiber, Staff * [$ t t ' W S. Beal, Senior Fellow

• Designated Federal Employee p

NRC PRESENTATION ON STATUS OF OPEN ISSUES {h Ms. Kerrigan gave a summary of the licensing status and the status of the open k' issues in the Safety Evaluation Report (SER). Ms. Kerrigan noted that the Palo Verde review was conducted as a custom review even though it references CESSAR. + g506062382010s W ORIcInit l ^c"s j waz cert m e ,, o,

Palo Verde Meeting November 23-24, 1981 f. She said that reviews of future CESSAR plants will not be conducted in this manner. She described what was in the Palo Verde SER versus the CESSAR SER. Mr. Bender asked about the confirmatory item concerning the load sequencer. Mr. Allen of Arizona Public Service Company (APS) said the issue was whether a sneak circuit analysis had to be crried out. Mr. Allen of APS said that he would discuss some of the open issues later in the day as they arose during the scheduled presentations. Mr. Van Brunt of APS then described APS's interaction with the NRC Staff during the review, including the use of independent design reviews for certain areas. He said the independent design review method was helpful. Mr. Bender asked about the malieup,of the review board and Mr. Van Brunt said that there were representatives from APS, Combustion Engineering Inc. (CE) and outsi.de people, including EPRI and Southern California Edison. Mr. Bender asked if the board did a prior review of drawings and Mr. Van Brunt said yes. Mr. Catton asked if there had been any changes made as a result of the review and Mr. Van Brunt said yes. He and Ms. Kerrigan gave some examples. Mr. Van Brunt then described the site and the construction schedule, and Mr. Rogers presented a comparison of Palo Verde with other units. He noted that there are few shared facilities among the three units and that the cooling tower makeup water comes from Phoenix treated sewaage effluent. He noted that the condenser tubes are made of titanium. Mr. Ebersole asked about the chlorine content of the condenser cooling water, and Mr. Rogers replied that he did not know exactly how much chlorine was in the water, but the dissolved solids content was about half that of sea water. Mr. Rogers noted that APS had done pot boiler corrosion tests for steam generator materials using water similar to the sewage effluent. Mr. Bender asked if the Staff has reviewed these tests and Ms. Kerrigan said she would like to defer her answer. Ms. Kerrigan also agreed to respond at the full Committee meeting to a question from Dr. Shewmon on se;ondary chemistry. Mr. Binford asked about the redundancy of the spray ponds. His question was deferred until a later presentation. The answer given then was that the spray ponds are l normally connected together but can be isolated from one another. Mr. Binford then asked if there,was any way to share certain equipment, such as b

• m m " = - rmerm upp w s -

Palo Verde Meeting November 23-24, 1981 the diesel generators, among plants; i.e., if the site lost power and the diesels for one unit were inoperable, could the diesels from another unit be used to supply power? After some discussion am.ong APS and the Subcommittee members, it was agreed that the rule of independence precluded such an arrangement. UTILITY ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT Mr. Woods introduced this topic. Mr. Bender asked for an explanation of where the quality assurance function fit into the organization. Mr. Woods described the quality assurance organization under Mr. Roedel. Mr. Ebersole asked if top man _agement participated in the determination of whether to simply meet the NRC requirements or to go one or more steps beyond. Mr. Woods said they did and cited the selection of titanium for the condenser tubes as an example. There then followed a discussion of as-built drawings and how they were kept up to date. Mr. Bender asked the Staff if they performed a quality assurance check on the as-built drawings and Mr. Fiorelli of the Staff replied yes. Mr. Binford asked who among the various organizations involved in the construction had the responsibility for quality assurance and Mr. Van Brunt of APS said that APS did. Mr. A..dognini of APS then described the APS organization which will be responsible for operating Palo Verde. Dr. Shewmon asked about the use of alternate members at Safety Audit Committee meetings and Mr. Andognini replied that no more than two alternates could be used at a meeting. Mr. Ebersole asked if the Safety Audit Committee or Plant Review Board had any plans for an ongoing look at systems and interfaces to try and discover weakness. Mr. Andognini replied no. Mr. Bender said the full ACRS would like to hear how the several safety committees work together. Mr. Andognini then introduced Mr. Hartley of APS who discussed the operating organization. Mr. Binford asked if the operations quality assurance manager reported to anyone other than Mr. Hartley. Mr. Hartley replied that he reported to the corporate quality assurance manager and had the authority to bypass Mr. Hartley if necessary. Mr. Harticy described the maintenance organization and how a single oranization, operating three shifts, will be responsible for all three units. Mr. Bender asked about transmitting information from one shift

%#iMMEMX6MM@MMM Palo Verde Meeting November 23-24, 1981 f to the next, and Mr. Hartley said that was a concern regardless of whether there were three shifts or one. Mr. Mathis asked where design changes were handled and Mr. Hartley explained. Mr. Bender asked about access to the as- ) built drawings and Mr. Van Brunt indicated that' they had a sophisticated records management system and the drawings were available 24 hours a day. Mr. Van Brunt then described his organization, which is responsible for engineering and construction. Mr. Binford asked what the engineers under Mr. Rogers were going to do when the construction was complete. Mr. Van Brunt said that they would be responsible for engineering support. Dr. Catton asked if APS had the capability to do transient analysis and Mr. Van Brunt said yes. Mr. Ebersole asked if APS had-anyone who looked at sequential (cascade) failures and Mr. Van Brunt said no, but th' t they are developing the capability. Mr. a Bender asked who decides what engineering capability is needed and how to develop it. There was considerable discussion of this question but no clear answer. At the end it appeared that Mr. Roger's and Mr. Allen's organization would either develop the needed capability or contract for it. Mr. Van Brunt then continued to describe the Q/A organization. Mr. Arnold asked about quality control versus quality assurance. Mr. Van Brunt replied that Bechtel performed both quality control and, in a separate organization, the quality assurance. The APS function was quality assurance over Bechtel. Mr. Arnold then asked about quality control during maintenance. There then followed a somewhat confusing discussion of who did what, the outcome of which was that a discussion of this topic was to be given to the full Committee. Mr. Van Brunt then described the site construction organization. ROLE OF STA AND TRAINING Mr. Hartley discussed the role of the Shift Technical Advisor (STA) and the training organization. Dr. Shewmon asked about the training manager's experience and Mr. Hartley agreed to supply his background. Dr. Catton asked if anyone in the training department had experience with accident analysis and Mr. Hartley said no. Dr. Catton pointed out that simulators do not always reproduce accidents

.f f C W g[ 9 4' .WsW f i Palo Verde Meeting November 23-24, 1981 f faithfully and it is useful to have someone who can recognize this. Mr. Hartley then described the checking APS had done on their simulator. Dr. Catton asked if APS was following the program at EPRI regarding operator training. Mr. Hartley did not seem to be aware of it but said he would check it out. Dr. Catton suggested that APS also look into the work on simulator fidelity being done at Brookhaven National Laboratory, and Mr.' Hartley agreed. Mr. Hartley noted that the simulator is qualified to an ANSI standard and Mr. Bender asked the NRC Staff to tell the full Committee whether the ANSI standard was adequate. Mr. Andognini pointed out that APS was developing in-house c'apability to check the simulator results using RETRAN. Mr. Hartley then described noh-lf, censed personnel training at APS. Dr. Shewmon asked about who would respond to a maintenance call at 4:30 am - the best qualified person or the one with least seniority. Mr. Hartley pointed out that the maintenance control center is in operation 24 hours per day and they would send the proper person for the job. Mr. Hartley then continued his presentation and described training for accidents beyond the design basis accident. He noted that this course is still under development. In response to a comment from Dr. Catton that not everyone agrees on what to do during certain accidents, Mr. Hartley said the training will be along the line of recognizing the conditions so as to be able to take action. Dr. Catton asked if APS were participating in the industry program on degraded cores, and Mr. Van Brunt said yes, he was the APS representative. l INTERFACES l Mr. Van Brunt then introduced the topic of interfaces between the NSSS and l the B0P. He then turned the discussion over to Mr. Davis from CE. Mr. ] Binford asked the Staff is they agreed with CE's position that all the i interface requirements are contained in CESSAR. Mr. Grimes of the NRC Staff replied that they are continuing to review this area. Dr. Catton asked whom the utility had to justify exceptions to and Mr. Davis replied to CE and the NRC. Mr. Davis, in response to a question from Mr. Ebersole,

I i Palo Verde Meeting November 23-24, 1981 said that where CE thought it important, they specified the action required if interface requirements are exceeded. Mr. Bender asked if it was possible to trace the reason for each interface requirement and Mr. Davis said yes. ] Mr. Rogers of APS discussed the interfaces from their standpoint. Mr. Bender asked whether, in view of the fact that Bechtel is handling the interfaces, t Bechtel understood th'e reasons for them. Mr. Rogers said for the most part yes. Dr. Shewmon asked about the use of high strength bolting and Mr. f Rogers agreed to discuss this at the full Committee. 'i At this point (5:56 pm) the meeting was recessed, to resume the following day. EMERGENCY PROCEDURES Mr. Callahan f. rom CE began the meeting with a description of the assistance CE provides on emergency procedures. He discussed the symptom oriented versus event oriented approach and pointed out that in some cases one may be the best and in other cases the alternative is true. Mr. Bender asked the Staff whether the emergency procedures were a part of the CESSAR docket or the Palo Verde docket. Ms. Kerrigan replied that the emergency procedures themselves were part of Palo Verde, and Mr. Grimes said that the CE guidelines have not been reviewed as part of CESSAR but could be. Mr. Hartley of APS then described the Palo Verde emergency procedures. Mr. Ebersole noted that the STA's role was not mentioned. Mr. Hartley replied that his role is one of assisting in diagnosis. Mr. Hartley in response to a question from Mr. Binford noted that the operator, in the case of multiple alarms, is trained to assure that critical functions are being maintained while he diagnoses the cause of the problem. Mr. i Bender asked if APS was taking advantage of the Southern California Edison experience with emergency procedures. Mr. Hartley said that they did not have copies of the procedures yet, but planned to get copies when they became available. Mr. Arnold asked if management personnel could relieve the operators if they l wished and Mr. Hartley replied yes, but only if they held a senior reactor operator's license. Dr. Siess asked that, if the STA were not required by the NRC, would APS have them. Mr. Hartley replied probably not. He said, given the choice, he would prefer to upgrade the shift supervisors. Mr. j Ebersole suggested that the Staff should investigate what the relationship l

MdiW Palo Verde Meeting November 23-24, 1981 between the STA and the SR0 should be. Mr. Bender suggested that APS should think about what lines of communication they should have set up to get help in the event of an accident. There then followed a discussion of communica-tions. Mr. Binford asked what authority the shift supervisor had to ignore or alter procedures. The reply by Mr. Hartley was that there is a procedure which allows him to make changes to meet the technical specifications, but that is as far as his authority goes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO OPERATIONS Mr. Hartley then discussed the sup)lementary technical infomation available to the (,perators. Mr. Mathis pointed out, in reference to the plant status board, that at TMI-2 some valves were thought to be open which were actually shut. He asked how does the operator know that status is correct. Mr. Hartley replied that all maintenance work is handled from a central location and that there is redundant checking between the operations and maintenance people. There was at this point a considerable discussion of which tehnical support personnel are available in the event of an accident and how they would be made available. COMMUNICATIONS Mr. Hartley then described how operating, maintenance, and service personnel communicate with one another. There was some discussion, instituted by Mr. Ebersole, of whether the communications equipment would survive a serious accident and how an operator who has to evacuate an area would notify the control room. CONTROL ROOM DESIGN Mr. Sterling of APS gave a presentation on control room design. Dr. Catton asked, if the human factors study uncovered problems in the control room design, ' ' would APS be wiling to change it. Mr. Sterling said yes. STATEMENT BY MS. HARRINGTON At this point Mr. Bender noted that he had a request from Ms. Harrington, a member of the public, to make a statement. Ms. Harrington expressed a concern

u.ayouarm s-Palo Verde Meeting November 23-24, 1981 b= about water usage. Mr. Bender pointed out that this was not a safety issue, but that it did come under NEPA. Ms. Kerrigan of the NRC Staff said she would send a copy of the environmental statement to Ms. Harrington. SHUTDOWN FROM OUTSIDE CONTROL ROOM Mr. Allen of APS discussed shutdown from outside the control room. Mr. Ebersole asked about the independence of the alternate shutdown panel and the control room and there followed a considerable discussion of this point. Mr. Allen then discussed 10 CFR 50, Appendix R. He stated that upon reso-lution of three items, that they would meet the requirements of Appendix R. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION OF EQUIPMENT Mr. Barrow of APS discussed environmental qualification of equipment and station blackout. Mr. Bender asked about the testing required for environmental qualification and Mr. Barrow replied that the vendor proposes the tests, and APS reviews the proposal; the vendor then performs the tests and APS reviews the results and analysis. There was some discussion between i Mr. Ebersole and Mr. Barrow about testing units as they actually will be versus testing parts. Mr. Bender said that it would interesting to some day see a comparison of the seismic load on parts attached to the diesels with the loads imposed by the diesels themselves. f STATION BLACK 0UT Mr. Barrows then discussed the APS grid and station blackout. Mr. Bender asked how APS decided what the largest load lost should be. Mr. Barrow replied they looked at the largest existing load and would re-analyze should a larger single load come up in the future. Mr. Bender asked if the Staff a3 reed with that approach and Ms. Kerrigan asked to defer the answer. Mr. Ebersole asked if A>S had looked into a storm destroying lightning arrestors followed by a lightning strike and Mr. Barrow said they had not. There was a discussion of the Rancho Seco event and the loss of non Class IE instruments, l and Mr. Barrow said they could go to cold shutdown using only Class IE instru-l ments. Mr. Bender asked the Staff about this and Ms. Kerrigan indicated it was an open item. Mr. Binford asked Ms. Kerrigan if the Staff could look to see if there is any conflict between vital in the Code of Federal Regulations and the IEEE definition of Class IE. Ms. Kerrigan agreed to. I

Palo Verde Meeting November 23-24, 1981 COOLING WATER SYSTEMS Mr. Rogers of APS then discussed the cooling water systems at Palo Verde. Mr. Ebersole asked if losing a few spray heads,from a tornado or other cause would result in loss of the spray capability. Mr. Rogers said that was an open item and was currently being reviewed. There then was a discussion of decay heat removal, the gist of which was that the auxiliary feedwater system is t' e only way of removing decay heat and depressurizing h to the point (350 psig) where the shutdown heat removal system can be used. (N.B. the Palo Verde plant does not have a power operated relief valve.) Mr. Rogers said that it would take about eight hours to depressurize using the auxiliary feedwater system and that APS was considering upgrading the pressurizer vent to get more relief capacity. IN-SERVICE INSPECTION AND CHEMISTRY Mr. Hartley then discussed the in-service inspection program and chemistry c'ontrol. In response to a question from Sir. Bender, Mr. Hartley said they have a plan to deal with in-service inspection once the plant becomes radio-active. Mr. Shewmon asked the Staff how old was Section 6.6 of the Standard Review Plan (dealing with in-service inspection). Ms. Kerrigan said she would have to defer the answer. Mr. Shewmon asked about accessibility. Mr. Van Brunt answered that both APS and Bechtel had spent a considerable amount of time looking at accessibility. Mr. Bender asked about stecn generator tube inspections. Mr. Hartley said that APS is now doing a 100 percent baseline inspection and was not sure when they would do the first inspection after operation starts. Dr. Shewmon asked how many of their chemists were available. Mr. Hartley said they were staffing for unit one but the number would increase as units 2 and 3 progressed. Dr. Shewmon asked about getting resin out of the steam generators and Mr. Hartley noted that they have i enhanced blowdown. Mr. Mathis asked about the condition of the system after flushing and Mr. Hartley described the APS procedure. ~ SECURITY AND ICC INSTRUMENTATION Mr. Hartley then briefly discussed security measures at Palo Verde. His discussion was general so that the meeting did not hae to be closed. Mr. Bender asked if the Staff was satisfied and Ms. Kerrigan replied, yes, with the exc.eption of a few minor items. l

Palo Verde Meeting November 23-24, 1981 Mr. Sterling of APS discussed the instrumentation to follow the course of a serious accident. Dr. Catton asked what power was required for the heated junction thermocouple (HJTC) and Mr. Sterling replied 24 watts. Mr. Ebersole asked if the HJTC would work if there were foaming and Mr. Sterling replied yes. Dr. Catton asked noted that if the steam had a lot of entrained drops the HJTC could be misleading. Mr. Bender asked why APS chose the HJTC as opposed to other devices. Mr. Sterling said that APS did their own study to select what they thought was the best device. Mr. Ebersole asked APS to give a brief discussion at the full Committee meeting on the habitability of the control rooms at two units if the third unit is releasing large amounts of radioactivity. EMERGENCY PLANNING AND TMI ISSUES Mr. Brown of APS then described emergency planning. Ms. Kerrigan indicated that the Staff and APS differ somewhat as to the role of the mini technical support center. Mr. Bender asked where personnel decontamination would be done and Mr. Brown said at one of the other units. If evacuation were necessary, APS had an altervate decontamination location. Mr. Bender remarked that there seemed to be a large number of agencies involved in the emergency plan. Mr. Allen of APS discussed virious TMI-2 issues, and indicated that APS has committed to meeting the requirements of NUREG-0737. MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS There then was a series of short presentations covering one item carried over from the CESSAR meeting the week before in Windsor, Connecticut and items which came up in this meeting. Mr. Scherer of CE discussed the 16x16 fuel. Mr. Van Brunt discussed the ultimate capacity of the containment. The gist of this discussion was that ultimate capacity is not well defined..There was a brief discussion of what the Staff is going to require for hydrogen control, and Ms. Kerrigan said she would cover that at the full Committee meeting. Mr. Rowland of APS described what APS is planning in the area of probabilistic risk assessment. Mr. Bender then asked the various members and consultants to sum up their feelings.

LN2NNF Palo Verde Meeting November 23-24, 1981 The Committee then agreed to bring APS's application to the full Committee on I December 10, 1981, and the meeting was adjourned at 3:17 p.m., November 24, 1981. i 'l ] i = l t i NOTE: Additional details can be obtained from the transcript located in the Public Document Room, 1717 H STREET, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20555 or from Alderson Reporting, Inc., 400 Virginia Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. (202) 554-2345.

l \\ l Federal RegL-'- / VolJ06. No. 215 / Friday. Novernber 8. test / Natione 35173 work of the employee in question. La. long work hours in en unfamihar settms, abould matadals be possessed and used in have oferted the Lcensee to the need to accordance with the statements. hold a meeting on November as, and 34 enluete the potential for an overexposun la sopresentations and proseduwe caotainedin 1981 at the Houday Inn-beetro Center. toboense puestion dated October E. terg-3532 West Peoria Street. Phoenix. A7. b case.7 ds should havs been particularly evident to ' he Lcensee because of the Training Program and D e Subcom mlnee wHlafiamaa4be Frequency bosnas opp." ttached sa item Nas 13 to the appUcadon of Arisona Pub!kServios overeupoei e which had accorred to a new employee y rforming similar wart during the tion spedSea, among other Company for an operadag hasaseloe fourth queri >r of1s? while working long entfident training program will be of b Palo M Nts 1.I and S. tiass, that boun in an afamhr settmg ne b=name to ensure that a!! personnel aboaid be ave been awan of the high reasin prop truction in the items b accordann wtth the procedures E potentialfor n6viduals performing tha task spedfied in i 12 af10 CFR Part 19. outlined in the FederalRegister on H September 30,1981 [46 FR 47803, oral or to receive eh > ated extremity doses and tac}u&ng re&o 'calsafety procedurn wHtten statements may be prese)nted by c should have een attempting to determine appropriate to e!r roepective duties. and control 1 r 1 r rate of progressively Naboretary See for b use of members of the Uc. recordings WUI occumulated i ibation dose. Raeoective hre ria!" ettadied sa ltem No. b permfuad dudng tboe pot' dons Conaequent. in mid-November 1980 when Is to se beena me awere of the slow obr &lage "as Destion requires, among af the meeting a transcri tis being b bcensee b t. and ttuesdons may h h dy of deposable gloves P eesponse of the oslmetry service. It should at aD times whDe dhng rsdioactive by teetnkte of b SubcoundMae.its have taken sie to 11mit the exposure of the materials and pe el maaltoring of hands consultants, and Staff. Persons desiring employee untilI could be sun mhat See contamination er completing each to make oral statements should notify exposure he had perusUy remfved Sewral procedun or before aving b area. approaches for dose evaluation were possIble Coctrary to the ebpve on March 11.19g1 the Cognizant Federa' Employee as far bclu&ng resiew1pg workload and provi&ng the inspectore aboersed that at least two b advance as practicable so that espplementary dasanetry. Suni! arty, when drivere wholoeded s$ sche casse with appropdate arrangements can be made t%e hoensee finaUg received the cosimetry endiopbsmaceuti and b ineeWals to allow the necessary time during the nport in mid Decenber and became awan who cleaned ehle!ds t had been returned. meeting for such statements ~ of the abnormaUy high exposun in October did not wear gloves. ad& tion. an he enum mung wul be open to I with the hkehboodof a similar exposure in in&vidual stated that 'w did not routinely Public attendance except for those November (because work con &uons had not survey his fingen for isboactive changed) more draste action, such as conuminadon. Moreovir, u of March 11. Ands it necessary to discuss propdetary massions during which the Subcommittee eemoving the employee from or severely 1981. at least two in&viilu als were not given kmiting bis activities with rs&oachve the required instruction la that they were not and Industrial Security information. One matenal for the rest of the quarter. could aware of the requirements to wear gloves se mom closed sesalona atty be in$ca e th IIu while handhng radiosetite materials and to necessary to discuss such information. monhor their hands for contamination after (Sunshine Act don 4]. To the a as wer t or sateat practica t ese closed assalons bcensee telled primarily on the N N ce mee of dosimetry reports in evaluating personnel exposure. the delay in receipt of k con e en to dosimetry nports may have been boluotion andConclusioe in attendance. of thepublic sentibiory to b bcensee,a lack of mal t " ne licensee denies tha violation, but De agenda forsubject meeting shall owe e. t w sYot admits that the drivers failed to wear glovesbe as foHows: j th c e ""h # $' "g"da as nquind.no AfondayNovemberD. 2881 -.2.dDp.m. l ep ary cause of b exposure in excess of hmits. De han e[* d mqhd betrwdon ph to smfilthe conclusion c(business. Scensee's assertion that ite *'abihty to ,g g i ch ack h by ThesdayNovember2(,2881--4fD monitor or control ra&suon ex;esure in this Instance was pharmatopes,beyond the control of employment la ed& don, b Bonnen ekke e m. smtillhe opnclus/co ofbushises. is incornet ne responalbility bt then employees have been reinstrucssd Dudog the in!dal perdon of the b be requinments i smeeting, the Submmmfttee, along w4th s cann be de s Scansee's dosfmetry supp!!er. Various usb some trawng waagna to two any ofits consultants who q be A measuru such as bse descrbd above M ptesent. wG! exchange prelimlaaty be Qckh views Ng rding snatters to be could and should han been taketL Rebanos not contr en the efter.the. fact nport of en exposure and effec % ne issue is bpube considered during the balance of the tfveness of the trat4 An "U"8-which has occurred to contro! reistion adequate training prog am moet assun ht exposures rather then a continuing employees understand, as weH as receive %e Subcomm!! tee wf!!then hear entusbon of the working condibons and safety and that employees applyboemoutnd instruct!ons regarding rediolog Presentations by and bold discussions esposun potential of an employee la with representatives of the Artsona Public Service Company,NRC Staff. understandings in the ormanan of e the1 ce a d n s fety " ***** ' training thett consultants, and other Interested protection progrant nat is the reason a civil [v'o'! persorts mgarding thIs review, penalty has been imposed in this case, d we et of ne item, as stateiis a violation. De referenord to the citatice. Further information regarding topics %e item. as stated,is a otolatiot;N to be disassed, wheder the meeHag ' Information prnented by & ticensee does penalty was proposed for thisitem! ocivg l'as been canalled or rescheduled, the e. so provide a besis for mo&ficati ofthis Chairman's ruling on toquests for the No*e* men'tYNonoompflance yme at s en tu-as.ee am opportunity to item a sumo caos rees.es.e and the time a_present ors 1 statements to cnt ie it Instruct en inbutru ht b ticebe obtained by a prepaid telephone ceR to notted therefor can be auais working to eted areas to b precautions and proceduma to minimize exposure to redioactin matertals, Advfsory Committee on Reactor the cogn! rant DesignatedFedere! to the purpose and functions of protective Safeguarda, Subcomm!ttee on Palo. Employee Mr. Gary Quittschreiber air dedces ecopfo ed. and in the appficable Verde Nuclear Generating Stauort; Mr. Stuart X. Beal. Staff Engineer cadINUn'Also,co d$ ['7g Notice of Meeun9 (telephone 202/634-3287] be' ween M5 %e ACRS Subcommittee on Palo e m. and 5:00 p.in EST. No. os-tax &ctMD requ!ns that ticenaed Verde Nuclear Generating Station wfB I have determined, in accordance with subsectica 10(d) of the Federal Advisory s G I

l wraggg,p,,, g.y Federal Register / Vet es, No. 215 / Friday November e, test / Nation's setM l Consettee Act[ diet it s ey be necessary acnose Nodos of change la heure of changa.Both ports udt! rummhs apes service. - beyond the monaal beelness bows set to close saane portions of ads meeting to forth in the regulatloan and area i protect proprietary and Iridustrial gy,,,u,y,. yg,,g,,,,,,,,,g businesses req port services aber Se. sty taforms%on.ne authority for change in Ibe bours of service at & han may ontact Nan-. such doeure is Examption (4) to the Customs of entry at Andrede and oUlcials for service which would be Sunshine Act.8U.S.C.snab(cK4} Tecate, Ca in. Carrently, the hours ofo tion 8:00 am to addnight at provided an si swimbursable beels. Deted. November g 1581. An and 7. as to midnight at Acmrdias!), effective December F. W L Chek. Tecate.He ne of servios at both 1981 the houn of service at the Castems 8**Y 'l#""" ports willbe e 00

m. to toco pa' daily. ports of entry it Andrede andTesata, i

1 Cahforala, wi; be irem aso to spee p.sa. P' *= 86*" *'8 "** **"8 ne hange wfD able Customs to I

===esseson.*N' obtain more emci t use ofils dauy. personnel, facili

• and resources in the Data Sem U sat SalALLSUSTMESS ADMIN!5TRATION WEEam T area.

[Decieressen et penasser Lean Area 72e151 [rvi[wu! [av on N '*"'w arrofCheeseis d#'# C T:mma; Doctoreton of Disaster Loen. December 7,19tri. I P8D**

• mas y sus-}

Aree pon,vemesa won non couracu

• • = coac '==t' As a res of the President's major Joseph F. OT;orman, of

.i disaster de ration.1 find that Cooke, inspection.US Cus a Servica.1301 placet Service i Parker Step na and Taylor Counties Constitution Avenue 'W, Washington, IDePt. Cire. 578, Rev,Sgp.90e101 cnd the foDo adjacant counbes. D.C. an22s ( Surety Compardes M-:+;t9 on

Callaham, an. Shackelfosd, Hood, suces.saspriaat seroegasviosc i

Federal Bonde b Jack. Wise. ni

e. and Eastland.

mup-A certificate of, rity as an within the Sta Tex.as constitute a disasterana use of damaan Section 101.8, Cartony Regulations (1g acceptable surety on Federal bonda la resuldng from storms and CFR 101.6). provides the each Customs l Dooding be - on or about October omce shall be open for t ne transaction hereby issued to the following company of Customs business be een the bours under Sections 6 to 1{ of Title e of the 12.1981. Ehgible na, Erms and of 8.30 am and 520 pm aD days of United States Code. An ederwriting crganizations may le applicaticas for aat SM M ud Wmf WOO % h ""* hor p national holidays. It also vides that established for the co pany. a ma 8' " ber 8f h for economic todustry untd close of gg e gen all be d businese on July 23,1%r at: between the hours of 800 am and 500 Ausiners Address:Sa54 Pogo Avemma. SmaB Basiness Admihtration. District pm Many omees provide siervice during Skokle. Uhnata sow 7 l Omce,1100 Commerte Street, Room hours in addition to those slkecified la st,se of tacerporwoow T ,ho$ pa,, or Cartificates of auth y expire an 3C38. Dadas. Texas 75241 or SmaD Business Ahkadca. District Andrade and Tecate. Califoraja, located June 30 each year, unless renewed prior to that date or sooner revoked.De Offica. 712 Federal Office Blds. of US on the US.Me.xican border,lh the San certificates are subject to esbeequent Court Hoose taos Taxah Avanes. Diego Customs district (Region VII). are annual renewal so long as the Lubbock. Texas 79e01. (' open fmm et00 as to midnight and 7s0 am to midnight, resactively. However, companies remain qualified (31 UR cr other loca!!y armounced locations'. becense the volurne of traffic ~ sing Part 223). A list af qualified companies Informatim a ncent ngulaWy through each between the bpurs of is published annually as cif July 1la changes (P.I. FT-35, approved, August 13, 3n.00 pm a dnight (an average of Department Circular 570, vith details as 1981)is avsflab'Ie at the above 12 vehicles) does not wanant proyidaag to underwriting limitatione, areas ha mentioned affice(s) regular service during these houra, which licensed to trensact purety Detg th as,1981. district and regional Custons offidels busines: and other information. Feders! have recommended that the hours (f bond-approving officers should annotate Donahgm. % service at these ports be changed so that their teference copies of thsi, Treasury Actig Adniatoriveer, both are open from 600 am to 1000 Circular 570,1981 Revision 91 page P m Cosing both ports at1090 pm 33975 to reDect this addition. Copias of permit beMer use of Customs manpo the circular,when issued, may be and reduce administrative expenses. obtained from the Aodit Staff, Buress of DEPARTh0ENT OF THE TREASURY'.Be=cause opening Tecate at 600 am Covernment Financial Opere us, will provide additional servica for Department of the Treasury, Custorus service approximately 100 local commuter Wa shington. D.C. 20228. vehicles it also has been recamm*nA*d Dated. November t. test. [TA 4bE?st that that port be opened one hour . E Dmagins. Andrade and Tecate, Caff, Customs earlier "" O * ' ~ - - ' Entry Change in h W It is anticipated that Covemmental $f savings will wtweigh any pobuc p,3,,,,3,. rs.s n4a.se W KopsCY: Customs Service.Trsasury. Inconvenience resalting fmm the m,,. 1 l l l W.- Y_ ? A? Q w

&$@W IJ l ^ Foalueel Redster / Val 48, No. 218 / Priday. November 18, east / Natioso aw7 prwide more tiam Jar development of a Generating 8k-ha sshedialed to mest W DLC. All co-=== on this stipdated set elecotantions totween November 23 and 24, test at the 14alwiny ass waimme but must be the deadline for amendments and the Ina-Metro Center. Phoenix. AZ has been d by n.a.mh.,as, test. All ynhearing danged to the AIDHA INN,3s01 E. nts abomid be forwarded to:Mr. De Board also metabhak a Van Buren Street. Phoenis, AZ. All other Mark Human Fadors I ochedule for er =<*== in tids case items nmain the same as indumted in Engin ring Breed.Dwielon af Human and take sud w*laaa as anny the Federal Eagisaar published Facto safety. U.S. NUcisar Regulatory expodits the Participants in November 8, teel (es FR 86170). Co alon, Washington, D.C. ED655. the conference invined to sebmit Deted Neesesbar e,1 set. For kfamation, ar=*=re Mark groposed agenda to the Board by Samuel 1.G A. Drvision of Human Faders pecember 30,196 of& Coeurdadan.

Safety, ce of NedearBaactor Regulati U.S. Nedear Ragniatory Deted at Md., tila 5th day of pan =.m.ammars=du-uas.nas w November teel.

Commise n, Wa ahimpos. D.C. 30655. p ocu m Far the Atoude Se and Mr===eng Board. Telephon (301) 486-5 64. James L KeBoy, Deted at Marylmed, this19th dey CAcireran, Adaurds ureW AvsAmbaty of Staff Report for afN test. t on EvalueSon Cr# erie for Vous A. e. ye w summan ma n-mes asj Cortot Room Design RWn' Otief.Mumar occare EhsMeerdhr Stanch. saAmes come ro w.eI No e is siven that the 'a=mlaston's Nelon of 7bespre safety. r I OfBee Nuclear Raador Regulation pa nor. m-amn n-a a.as =! ID*d"' ** 8" M N has pub shed NUREG-OeQ1. Evaluation enAmsoma Offears Power Sydame. Criteria r Detailed Control Room Stanufacturing Licarise for Floating Dufgn iew, a draft nport for g Nuclear Power Plan Reconstitut&on comment. e copfes or this nport an SECURITIES $D EXCHANGE evallable e to the extent of supply COMMISSION I of Board and may be btained by written request Pursuant to the a rity contained in go the Direc. Division of Technical gyne No.22-ttas '1 10 CFR 2.721 (1960). Atomic Safety InformatSn d Document Control, and uoensing Board fo Offshore Power Wuhioston,Ih. ACF imfustries, he.; Application arid Systems (Manufactnrir uoense for This 4 raft remet conta!ns guldance to Opporturdty for Floating Nudear Power ts). Docket the user (lleens / app!! cant and NRC November e,1mi. No. SIN 50-347-MP, is b by staff)in dete the acceptability of nconstituted by appotn the the Delaued Con Room Dealgn Notics is here gfyse that ACF following Artministrative e to the Review and resulg'ng control room Industries, tad (the Board. Dr. Cearge A. F Mr. dulgn improvemehts.Rese criteria " Applicant") has an application Glenn O. Bright was a r of this were developed in tesponse to Item Eursuant to Section 10(bX1Xtilof the Board. but, because of a ule I.D.1. " Control Road Des!gn Review" of TrustIndenture Act 1939 (the "Act") conflict,is unable to contin to serve. NUREG-0B00, "NRC ction Plan for a finding that the of As reconstituted, the is Developed as a Ra of theTM1 Citibank. N.A. ('Otibutak") an comprised of the followine Accident." existing indenture new % Artmintatrative Judges: The evaluation crit a defined in this to be qualified under Act is not so Sheldon ) Wolfe.Gattman draft report does not e any new Mkely to involve a ma confhd of Dr. Devid R. Schmk functional design requirements.He interest as to nnake it in the blic interest or for the rotodian of Dr.Cea se A.Tergunta evaluation wtterie deGoes a bemos Sur {vestore to disquahfy fra AB correspondence, docume,tsand the staf!'s nylew of the Detailed Control other materials aball be fHed whh the Room Design Review. \\ octing as trustee unde existing Board in aecordance with to CF { 2.701 As stated in NUREC-etqu0 the NRC k1 denture and the to be fans to evaluate the impait on quahfied. (1980) ne address of the new IIard censees of the implement n of these Section 310(b) of the Act rovidas in memberis-Administrative Judge orge evaluation criteria. Co are painhat if a trustee under ladentum A.Ferguson School of Enginee. Howard University,2300 5th Stre specifically requested from qualtfied under the Act has y shah N.W., Washington, D.C. 20059. knowledgeable members of e public, acquire any conflicting inteWt it shall licensees, human factors spe lists, and within ninety days after as f = fning Issued at Bethesda, Maryland, this day otherlaterested partfes to ass t tha that it has such conflicting in of Noumber.19et. NRC in determining the im i either eliminate such confli ' interest 3 Jeu! Cottar, Jr, implercenting these criteria. or resign. Subsection (1) of Secnon and{* nsingSaardhdos/*frofireMre. Atoa* SoAt NUREC-0801 has been subal ed to providee, in effed, with Chie the Office of Management and t exceptions that a trustee under yi k ease ma u-u-a.**==l for review and clearance under qualified indenture shall be to suoie coes ren*e Paperwork Reduction Act of1980. have a conflicting interest if a tee ' nie draft report is issued for c is trustee under another indenture onder and toduetry comment.De which any other securitiee of the same Advisory Committee on Reacto' evaluate all comments it receives and issuer are outstanding. However, under Safeguards, Subcommittee on Palo snodify the report as needed in preposing clauss (11) of subsection (1), there may Verde Nuctear Generating Station; the final report. Comments received by be excluded from the operation of this Mukg; Location % the Commission will be mede avaGable provision another indenture under %elocation of the ACRS for public inspection at the which other securities of the lasuer are Subcommittee on Palo Verde Nuclear Commission's Public Document Room in outstanding,if the Issuer shall have s

November 23-24, 1981 DOCUMENTS PROVIDED TO ACRS SUBCOMMITTEE ON PALO VERDE -l ~: 1. Safety Evaluation Report Related to the Operation of Pal.o Verde Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1, 2, and 3, USNRC, NUREG-0857, November 1981. 2. Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, Final Safety Analysis Report with Amendments 1-6, Arizona Public Service Company. O s 1 6 4 O 4

ACRS SUBCOMMITTEE ON PALO VERDE AGENDA November 23-24, 1981 Phoenix, Arizona Presentation Actual Speaker Time

• Time I.

INTRODUCTION A. ACRS M. Bender 5 min. 1:00-1:05 (ACRS) B. NBC 1. Overview of OL Review J. Kerrigan ~ 5 min. 1:05-1:15 (NRC) 2. SER Open Items J. Kerrigan 5 min. 1:15-1:25 (NRC) C. Arizona Public Service Intro. 1. Site and Plant Description E. E. Van Brunt 5 min. 1:25-1:35 (APS) 2. Co=parison with other plants C. Rogers 10 min. 1:35-1:55 and special features (how (APS) BOP differs from other BOPS) 3. Response to SER Open Items J. Allen 5 min. 1:55-2:05 (APS) -- B R E A K -- II. DICSUCSSION OF OL REVIEW ISSUES A. Organization and Management 1. Utility Technical Capability ? T. Woods 15 min. 2:15-2:45 and Organization (Compliance G. Andognini with NUREG-0731) E. E. Van Brunt (APS) NRC Staff Comments J. Kerrigan 5 min. 2:45-2:55 2. Feedback to Operators W. Hartley 5 min. 2:55-3:05 from other plants and (APS) from internal safety 3. Uses of STA W. Hartley 5 min. 3:05-3:15 (APS)

• Presentation time is about half the actual time to allow for questions.

O

{ Eps[ d Novtaber 23-24, 1981 ACRS Subcommittee on Palo Verde Page Two Presentation Actual Speaker Time Time k B. Training 1. Training Organization W. Hartley 5 min. 3:15-3:25 ) Description ,(APS) 2. Operator Selection W. Hartley 5 min. 3:25-3:35 (APS) 3. Use of Simulators W. Hartley 5 min. 3:35-3:45 (APS) 4. Training of Non-Licensed W. Hartley 5 min. 3:45-3:55 Personnel (APS) 5. Training for Accidents W. Hartley 5 min. 3:55-4:05 Beyond the DBA (APS) -- B R E A K -- C. Interface Between CESSAR and Balance of Plant (BOP) 1. Interface Documentation G. Davis 10 min. 4:15-4:35 (CE) 2. Site-BOP Enveloping G. Davis 5 min. 4:35-4:45 Techniques (CE) 3. Technical Specifications G. Davis 5 min. 4:45-4:55 (CE) 4. Palo Verde Interfaces ,C. Rogers 10 min. 4:55-5:15 ' (APS) Tuesday November 24. 1981 D. Emergency Operating Procedures 1. Combustion Engineering V. Callahan 10 min. 8:00-8:20 4 (CE) 2. Arizona Public Service W. Hartley 20 min. 8:20-9:00 Presentation (APS) E. Human Factors 1. Control Room E. Sterling 5 min. 9:00-9:10 (APS) k 2. Availability of Supplementary W. Hartley 5 min. 9:10-9:20 Information to Operators (APS)

$)hW movemoer 44-44, 1981 ACRS Subcommittee on Palo Verde Page Three Fresentation Actual ( Speaker Time Time 3. Concunications Among Operating, W. Hartley 5 min. 9:20-9:40 Maintenance and Service (APS) i Personnel -- B R E A K -- F. Shutdown from Outside Control J. Allen 5 min. 9:40-10:00 Room (Independence between the (APS) two Shatdown Locations) G. Fire Protection-Compliance J. Allen 5 min. 10:00-10:1 with 10 CFR50 Appendix R (APS) H. Environmental Qualification of J. Barrow 5 min. 10:10-10:2-Equipment (R.G. 1.89-Conformance, (APS) Resistance to Fire Protection Environment, Operability of Equipment on Loss of Cooling l HVAC, RCP's, etc.) I. Reliability of Cooling Water and C. Rogers 5 min. 10: 20-10:4t Ultimate Heat Sink (APS) ( J. AC and DC Power Reliability J. Barrow 10 min. 10:40-11:0(; (Including Station Blackout (APS) and Recovery (Blackstart) K. Inservice Inspection Plans W. Hartley 5 min. 11:00-11:1( (APS) L. Instruments:. ion to Follow . E. Sterling 5 min. 11:10-11:2( Course of a Serious Accident (APS) (Including Unambiguous Indication of Core Cooling Capability) M. Chemistry Program (Including W. Hartley 5 min. 11:20-11:3C Start-up - Mainly Secondary Side) (APS) N. Emergency Planning L. Brown 1. Emergency Support Facilities L. Brown 10 min. 11:30-11:5C (APS) 2. Role of FEMA, State, and L. Brown 10 min. 11:50-12:lC Local Agencies (APS) O. TMI Issues not Covered Above J. Allen 10 min. 12:10-12:2C (APS)

r j November 23-24, 1981 ACRS Subcommittee on Palo Verde Page Four ( 1 Presentation Actual Speaker Time _ Time III. ACRS CONCLUDING REMARKS AND H. Bender 10 min. 12:20-12: DISCUSSION OF FUTURE AGENDA -(ACRS) ITEMS IV. ADJOUR'i 12:30 PM e l i ( (

. TIME __/'dd A/n. MEETING ROOM .DATE //'o23 - 8 / ADVISORY COMMllTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS V ETING g ,T b W ATTENDEES PLEASE SIGN BELOW (PLEASE PRINT) NAME BADZ4 AFFILIATION 1 Cucis Ciesues [ ude 2 hs Ve2 cia,ad ) ' wee 3 F ehue Mic ac,u h Wec 4 Er> 6xotw f NRG 5 BRuct 5 4 PLf W /)*PS. 6 i b ilia ~ f. L le ( flI' 5' 7 dc hl 4 .5\\3EDE L-. ) 4PS 8 Y$.5 )/fLL/ USC 9 G ib, 7-W E T 2. l G A/RC__~ 10 Lli, W Bo L H B E2WB u h w n ceAA. 11WeSr6/2o90uLeS ( Bear &L bae Goep. 12 6 f6/cswocri D A % c.a r e / d a/ c e cm 13 Toun u Fa rr1 Q L' E. 1s. c.e Op+. III / o m % l0 m ) /?bwd TUlufbdfNan is /sh,i N

1. 1. s icxT3aer M we' /so a

(- Mes' 17 Ke6mi s Euw 3 errrc-aj a,,,,i,,, 18 C $ W D. S tc77~ ( derra,c 6esvow 19 A J. So e o N ah,4.4#4 / c.yl,%L 20 $1.('m$rannes f $PS l

.. TIME _. /'dd A/n. MEETING ROOM DATE //'o?3 - 8 / ADVISORY COMMllTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS f ETING ATTENDEES PLEASE SIGN BELOW (PLEASE PRIf?T) NAME BAD:: 4 AFFILIATION Enar/ A/LLn ( CL sa %,ss' 2 A: n ~ uc u Manhe Ma(nics/ /% v3 e Af f M le a d f M ss Gif. Z)aw h c-E a 2 f(L uaro C APS g7 YL I, - i ' } M '- g8 $ W.bc4)+ w t~ 6*d 49 /... ? Y ni^ 10 Biuboew Ae s $\\ R.aue Bwom f A PS ) e e3 .s2

c. w.

9 uta v .13 ui. 6 B, a c u,m ( &=ocu, Cerm ri / L, m a #/ % J M AFY h5 die NN4 h 8f5 .16 % w k 3 P m m s,A-( MPS 17 Ch~/a & Bird ff D L //.i Wikes-l 18 lAdnw:r' f Orn., k /)PS 39 t.. .,: c c \\' AP3 8 bw h - f Af% & c! 1 y

JMjf)p!" T1HE._ /'dd A/n. MEETING ROOM ..DATE //'o23 - 8 / ADVISORY COMMllTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS f'ETING akD W ATTENDEES PLEASE SIGN BELOW '(PLEASE PRINT) NAME BAD:E @ AFFILIATION 1 Tohn J)Empssy ^ ( Ariz Rabb6i>m Roa. Ndecy 2 ... c 2 34m (%s) N AP3 g_% n l]m.Ga f ik k u, D 5 ( 6 i ) k 8 J 9 \\ 10 ( 11 D 32 ( 13 J 2n h 15 [ 16 3 v .C a f 20 \\

l j ( INDEPENDENT DESIGN REVIEWS (IDR's) o AC POWER SYSTEM o DC POWER SYSTEM o AUXILIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM o EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION o FIRE PROTECTION o INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROLS ( o AUXILIARY SYSTEMS o CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS e D ( FIGURE I.C.1-3A

) no s ^ c e uT 0 1 o T $wI X I N E0 f H f P a t 7 sg ' 1 a I lF o T 9 3*/, y t e#e i CM% e, 9 nu S N 5 O t i. 1 ss ? y 5 4 n C do a o I Rg Ye,- G E j .R A'o r 5 U u 8 o e G b o n e e d y Z I k e A F c k i W o T ,A l d k n o, e l B (i1 I i i a l iG 0 1 o y' T ',i',, J ' s 's T A N C [ j N m V P nn L I e d p re ~_ V o la g P ~ ll ,l

PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION - UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 SITE SITE LOCATION APPR0X. 50 MILES WEST OF DOWNT0WN PH0ENIX IN MARICOPA COUNTY, ' ARIZONA. SITE AREA: APPR0X. 4050 ACRES TOP 0 GRAPHY: FLAT OPEN DESERT SURROUNDED BY LOW HILLS. POPULATION: RADIUS (MI) POPULATION 19Z8 PROJECTED POPULATION 2000 0-1 0 0 0-5 1147 2010 0 3497 6114 SEISM 0 LOGY: BASIN AND RANGE PROVINCE, LOW LEVEL HISTORICALLY OF SEISMIC ACTIVITY. i HYDP0 LOGY: " DRY" SITE SITUATED AB0VE PROBABLY MAXIMUM FLOOD LEVEL 0F AREA WASHES AND RIVERS. i FIGURE ' c.1-8 -.. ~.. _. -, _, - - _. _, _ - _ _

PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION - UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 DESIGN NSSS: CE SYSTEM 80 STANDARD DESIGN GENERATING 3800 MWTH OF CORE HEAT. GENERATOR: GENERAL ELECTRIC, 1559 MVA, 1800 RPM, 24,000 V, 1304 MWE TURBINE: GENERAL ELECTRIC, 1800 RPM, TANDEM COMP 0UND, 6-FLOW, 43-INCH LAST STAGE BUCKET, WITH REHEAT AND ELECTR0-HYDRAULIC CONTROL SYSTEM. COOLING: 3 MECHANICAL FORCED DRAFT CIRCtLAR COOLING TOWERS PER UNIT. WATER: COOLING TOWER MAKEUP SUPPLIED FROM CITY OF PH0ENIX TREATED ~ EFFLUENT STORED ONSITE IN 80 ACRE RESERVOIR. PLANT MAKEUP / DOMESTIC WATER SUPPLIED FROM WELLS ONSITE. AE/ CONSTRUCTOR: BnCHTEL POWER CORP. TRANSMISSION SYSTEM: FOUR 525 xv 3 PHASE LINES TIED TO A COMMON ONSITE 525 Kv SWITCHYARD. FIGURE I.C.1-9 ~ v v

r R m F - - 1 Office of the g r -President l Chairman, Board of I I j lirectors; President l ..hief Exec. Officer l Keith L. Turley l l r - J j Legal Services Public Atfairs Manager 1 8 Manacer s L r-I I I Customer, Employee & Corporatee Finance Operations I Corporate Relations Planning & Control he dive ds Jr. e re, Executive Executive Vice Pres, & Chief I Vice Pr_e.sident & Chiof Ffn_ Of f f csw Doerneine offfcor l L.. _ _1 Customer Services Corporate Electric Operations 0 Administration G. Carl Andognini f Vice President Sec, 6_ ASS L._Ireas. Vice President L g V N Employee Relations Economic Planning & Engineering & Cor. trol; Vice Construction Vice President Prr.s. & Controller Vice Presiden_t Finance & Tax Accounting Cas Operations Treasurer Vice President fluclear Power Proj. Resources Planning Edwin E. VanBrunt,Jr Vice President vice President Research & Development Vice Prentdent e

pvt 4S caCMil2ATION Hartley ~ ~ Manager of Nuclear Operations i .g I l Engine,ering & Administrativ4 Operaticus Haintenance Startup WF Tech. Serv. Services Manager Su perin tenrien t Superintendent flanager Opera tions !!,nnear .Superintendend, h Cott6n Tench C1iffor.1 IMvers M.:1.a na Cale Ope rh t ict.s l Quality Training M;.ne.ger. Manager Security Manager l Russo Fernow II'180" II.A.l.B-16 ~ v

CPERATIO!;S DEPART.'tE!!T OTliER COPetEi',1 CAL TOTAL NUCLCAR PVN05 NUCLEAR PI.it.T !!0:1-UTILITY POSITION EXPERIEtlCE EX PE'tI *C;CE EXPERIE! CE NUCL'O.R EXPERII21CS Operations Superintender.t 12 yr 3 yr 5 yr 4 yr i Operating Supervisor - Unit 1 22 yr 4 yr 12 yr 6 yr I. Staitt Supervisors - Unit 1 104 yr (B) 20 yt (3) 64 yr (8) 20 yr (4) Acst. Shift Supervisors - Unit! 63 yr (5) 16 yr (5) 16 yr (5) 31 yr (5) Nucleat Operators III - Unit 1 3 47 yr (6) 17 yr (6) 13 yr (5) 17 yr (4) Nuclear Operator I L II - Unit i 90 yr (15) 16 vr (15) 16 yr (7) 38 yr '.12) Operattag Suparvisor - Unit 2 14 yr 3 yr 11 yr Shift Supervisors - Unit 2 73 yr (7) 21 yt (7) 31 yr (6) 21 yr (3) Aest. Shif t Supervisors - Unit 2 $8 yr (6) 21 yr (6)

• 15 yr (5) 22 yr (4)

Nuclear Operator III - Unic 2 29 yr (3) 7 yr (3) 14 yr (3) 8 yr (2) Nuclear Operator I & II - Unit 2 82 yr (15) 15 yr (15 12 yr (5) 55 yr (11) 534 yr (68) 143 yr (68) 198 yr (46) 253 yr (48) (Aug. 8. 7 yr) (Aug. 2. 1 yr) (Aug. 4. 3 yr) (Aug. 5. 3 yr) 1I.A.1.B-20 w v

INTERFACE CATEGORIES ( A. POWER ~ B. PROTECTION FROM NATURAL. PHENOMENA 1 C. PROTECTION FROM PIPE FAILURE D. MISSILES E. SEPARATION F. INDEPENDENCE 4 G. THERMAL LIMITATIONS H. MONITORING I. OPERATIONAL / CONTROLS [ J. INSPECTION AND TESTING K. CHEMISTRY / SAMPLING L. MATERIALS M. SYSTEM / COMPONENT ARRANGEMENT N. RADIOLOGICAL WASTE 0. OVERPRESSURE PROTECTION P. RELATED SERVICE ( Q. ENVIRONMENTAL R. MECHANICAL INTERACTION BETWEEN COMPONENTS

s .. ~ 9 e 11. BECHTEL/ SUPPLIER INTERFACES A. CONTRACTUAL RESPONSIBILITY 1. CE 2. GE ( 3. OTHER VENDORS i B. ADI11NISTRATION C. UTILITY OVERVIEW 6 ( FIG.URE II.C A-3

I ( t EMERGENCY PROCEDURE GUIDELINE SYSTEM SEORMAL CMRATEM L. _ 6 M OF SAEETYFUNCT;CfRE ?? j ASC00 LATE SYM770W14Gi P LOSS OF FUMniCM OPTIEAL ENE

• r5 ^
• REC!PrCK!-

vuce"asitsu = pgggggy PATil Sem 1 PAT!i ( u F RFAC~lW W M N OL STATCS AND TREN0tM DIAGMOSTC REACTOR TREP REACTIVITY CCNTROL AM i RC3 NEAT RE8A3 VAL P IE!SURE ATC UtVENTORY MMT RENL CONTA% LCS5 0F FEED-I MATRIX OF ACTCNS AS FOUNO LCSSUF FLCW/NC g g., STEAM LINE EREA% (AFSS)?.E A*>D f.WENTOMY ca!FnGL Jl LDCA I l FTEAM GENERATOft Tutz RUFTURE em m, w e

O val.UE OP' EVENT 4 ORIENTATED APPROACH 2 m "i .4 W ~e m 3 "y n Q nm c E 5, E n e H E$ 5

= m N o.

= 9 --<D Y 5; z VALUE OF FUNCTION N 4 c ORIENTATED APPROACH ~... 1 e e

EMERGENCY OPERATING PROCEDURE DEVELOPMENT '( PVNGS METHOD A. UTILIZES EVENT ORIEriTED PROCEDURES DEVELOPED FOR OWNERS GROUP 1. DIAGi10STIC PART IS HADE COMMON INSTEAD OF INCLUDED IN EACH PROCEDURE. 2. IMMEDIATE ACTIONS SPECIFY CORE PROTECTION FOR ANY AEn0RMAL CONDITION. l 3. AFTER DIAGNOSIS, SELECTED EVENT PROCEDURE IS ROLE

ORIENTED, A.

SRO PORTION IS C0ORDINATING Ar;D TRACKING [ PROCEDURE - MAINTAINS LEADERSHIP ROLE. B. R0 PORTION CONTAINS DETAILED CONTROL BOARD liiSTRUCTIONS FOR AREA 0F RESPONSIBILITY. 4. COMMuillCATIONS CHAlli IS ESTABLISHED IN PROCEDURE. 5. CHECK Poli 1TS TO VERIFY PLANT IS RESPONDING AS EXPECTED. 9 ~ II.D.2-2 O

EMERGENCY OPERATING PROCEDURE DEVELOPMENT PAGE 2 ( B. PROGRESS OF Ali EVENT (SEE. CHART) 1. OPERATOR RESPONDS TO ABNORMAL CONDITION - PROBABLY AN ALARM RESPONSE ACTION 2. CONDITION DETERIORATES A. NOTIFIES SR0 B. MAINTAINS SPECIFIED CRITICAL FUNCTIONS 3. SR0 ASSESSES OVERALL PLANT STATUS AiiD BEGINS EVENT DIAGNOSIS A. R0 IS MAINTAINING CRITICAL FUNCTIONS ( 4. SRO SELECTS APPROPRIATE PROCEDURE A. CONTINUOUSLY VERIFY PLAliT RESPONSE Il1TERFACESWITHEMEl}GENCY,0RGANIZATION B. C. ADVANTAGES OF METHOD 1. FORMALIZES COMMUNICATION 2. DEFIl4ES RESPONSIBILITIES l A. REDUCES STRESS 3. FOCUSES ON MAINTAINING PLANT SAFETY ( l 4. MORE EFFICIENT USE OF PERSONNEL 5. DECISION-MAKING AT SR0 LEVEL ll.D.2-3

( MAJOR HUMAN FACTORS STRENGTHS OBSERV'ED o LAYOUT AND GROUPING 0F SYSTEMS, SUBSYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS IS CLEAN AND UNCLUTTERED. l o FEW INSTANCES OF LONG, UNBROKEN R0WS OF SlHILAR

DISPLAYS, o

NUMBER OF ALARM WINDOWS IS NOT EXCESSIVE. o MinICS HAVE BEEN USED TO ENHANCE THE OPERATORS' UNDERSTANDING OF SYSTEMS. o EQUIPMENT LABELS ARE GENERALLY LEGIBLE. o SAFETY SYSTEMS STATUS IS INDICATED BY THE SESS PANEL. I i L 1 sg ( FIGURE II.E.1-6

\\ g i MAJOR HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCIES (HED'S) o CONTROL BOARD DEMARCATION o ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEM PRIORITIZATION AND CORRECTION OF INCONSISTENCIES o EXCESS CONGESTION ON ONE PANEL SIGNIFICANT HED'S WERE CONSIDERED TO BE: (, o FOXBORO CONTROLLER LABELING o J0G-VALVE POSITION INDICATION. e O FIGURE II.'E.1-7 i

( REMOTE SHUTDOWN RArlEL CRITERIA (GDC - 19) HOT SHUTv0Wii CONTROLS ARF MOUNTED ON THE REilbTE S o PANEL o COLD ShuTDOWri ACHIEVED USliiG ADDITIONAL LOCAL C0liTROLS DBA ASSUMED HOT TO OCCUR SI!1ULTAtlE00 SLY WITH CONTROL ROOM o LVACUAT10ii TWO TRAldS OF REi10TE SHUTDOWil C0tlTROLS AND IfiSTRUMENTAT10li o ARE INDEPEi4 DENT LOSS OF SAFE SHUTDOWN SYSTEM REDuilDANCY DOES NOT OCCUR AS o A RESULT OF THE EVENT (EXCLUDlHG CONTROL ROOM FIRE) REUVIRiiiG C0itTROL ROOM EVACUATION. k FIGUREIf.F-1

I 4 MAJOR FUNCTIONAL COMP 0NEliTS OF THE CE ICC MONITORiflG INSTRUMENTATION SYSTEM o SUBC00 LED MARGIN MONITOR (SMM) o REACTOR VESSEL LEVEL (HJTC) o CORE EXIT TEMPERATURE (CET) O 9 ~ ~~ FIGURE II.L-3

( EMERGENCY SUPPORT FACILITIES e CONTROL ROOM e TECHNICAL SUPPORT CENTER e MINI - TSC e OPERATIONAL SUPPORT CENTER ( e EMERGENCY OPERATIONS FACILITY e EMERGENCY NEWS CENTER e CORPORATE EMERGENCY CENTER O Il>N-2 )

r s O Executive Group Governor f Chairman, Maricopa Courty Board of Supervisors . Director ADES Director of N Operations I I Director State . County Radiological Technical Ope rations Ope rations Operations Dire ctorate Directorate (ADES) (MCDCD&ES) I I Radiological Facility EOF. Sheriff's Health Highway Volunteer Technical Di rectora te Dept. Dept. Dept. Agencies Dire cto ra t e Representative j. \\ I State County Field Chief Chief Support l of of Tea =s ( Monitors Moni to rs t i I I Monitor Pool Dept. Agriculture Health H6rticulture Se rvices Cee-J s s i o n i Dept. -- Dai ry Public Commission l Safety i \\ Dept. Livestock Economic Sanita ry { Se curi ty Board National Corporation Cua rd Commis sion (. Agencies Volunteer II.N-23 c .-}}