ML20052D103
| ML20052D103 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Beaver Valley |
| Issue date: | 04/21/1982 |
| From: | Starostecki R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20052D098 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-412-82-02, 50-412-82-2, NUDOCS 8205060279 | |
| Download: ML20052D103 (1) | |
Text
_ __ _ _
fSPEllDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION 1
l Duquesne Lioht Conpany Docket !!o. 50-412 l
Beaver Valley Unit 2 License fio. CPPR-105 As a result of the inspection conducted on March 1 - April 7,1982, and in accordance with the itRC Enforcenent Policy,10 CFR 2, Appendix C, 47 FR 9987 (March 9,1982), the following violations were identified:
A.
10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V and AllSI !!45.2(6) require that quanti-tative criteria, such as dinensions and tolerances, shall be specified, as appropriate, for determining satisfactory work perfomance and quality compliance.
Contrary to the above, as of April 1,1982, Drawing flo.12241-BZ-STD-PS-2A-2 for installation of pipe anchor PSA-027 shown on Drawing No. 103310-0E failed to include sufficient dimensions to assure adequate weld thickness.
This is a Severity Level IV Violation (Supplen'ent II).
B.
10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion X and ANSI N45.2 and 1145.2.5(5.5) require inprocess inspection of joint fit-up prior to start of welding on struc-tural steel. N45.2 further requires, that where a sample is used to verify acceptability of a group of items, the sanpling procedure shall be based on recognized standard practices and shall pro';ide adequate justification for the sample size and selection process.
Contrary to the above, as of April 1,1982, inspection of joint fit-ups was not being perfomed in accordance with a recognized samplinn procedure.
This is a Severi y Level IV Violation (Supplement II).
t Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Duquesne Light Company is hereby required to submit to this office within thirty days of the date of this
'lotice, a written statement or explanation in reply, including:
(1)the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations; and (3) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
Under the authority of Section 182 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, this response shall be submitted under oath or affimation. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending your response tire.
Orig!nal Signed Byi f
~
.f^ /D U x
. c APR 21 1982 Date a
PDR Di n of to d e d t D
0 2
. L RECCRP copy