ML20052D067
| ML20052D067 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perkins  |
| Issue date: | 04/30/1982 |
| From: | Sherwin Turk NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD) |
| To: | Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8205060241 | |
| Download: ML20052D067 (2) | |
Text
--
,* GRANTED //df2-April 30,1982
' For the Atomic Safety and iC605iD" ; 18Ed
/de
'gp -
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
~
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
~fYOU W* S(nith' Chairman BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of
)
)
DUKE POWER COMPANY
)
Docket.Nos.
STN 50-488
)
50-489 (Perkins Nuclear Station,
)
50-490 Units 1, 2 and 3)
)
NRC STAFF'S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION
[/
0F TIME IN WHICH TO RESPOND TO THE
-l MOTION OF DUKE POWER COMPANY T0 d
r WITHDRAW APPLICATION WITHOUT PREJUDICE @'
gu,
Pursuant to 10 C.F.R. 6 2.711 and 2.730, the NRC Staff ((" Staff")
f hereby moves for an extension of time of 14 days, until May 2'4, 1982, in which to respond to the " Motion of Duke Power Company to Withdraw Application Without Prejudice" (" Motion").
In support hereof, the Staff states as follows:
1.
Applicant's Motion was filed on April 19, 1982, in accordance with the Licensing Board's Order of April 1,1982 (" Order").
Pursuant to the Licensing Board's Order, the Intervenors' response to the Applicant'.s Motion is due on or before May 4, 1982, and the Staff's response is due to be filed within five days after service of the Intervenors' response (Order, at 2).
2.
Counsel for the Staff has been advised by counsel for Intervenors that the Intervenors' response was filed and served by mail on April 29, 1982. Accordingly', pursuant to 10 C.F.R. 6 2.710 the Q)
D Staff's' response is due to be filed on or before May 10, 1982.
i O
r 8205060241 820430 PDR ADOCK 05000488 G
PDR i.nv A NR2
t l
3.
Counsel for the Staff is scheduled to be at an NRC hearing in New Orleans, Louisiana, from May 2,1982 to May 14,1982, and will be unable to prepare and file the Staff's response within the time permitted by the Licensing Board's Order.
In addition, counsel has not yet received the Intervenors' response to the Applicant's Motion, and i
anticipates that such response will not be received prior to counsel's departure for New Orleans. Accordingly, an extension of time is also required to permit Staff counsel to review Intervenors' response prior to filing the Staff's response to Applicant's Motion.
4.
Counsel for the Staff has conferred with Counsel for Applicant and Counsel for Intervenors and is authorized to state that those parties have no objection to the granting of the instant Motion.
WHEREFORE, pursuant to 10 C.F.R. QS 2.711 and 2.730, the Staff hereby moves for an extension of time of 14 days, until May 24, 1982, in which to respond to the Applicant's Motion.
Respectfully submitted, M
L Sherwin E. Turk Counsel for NRC -Staff -
Dated at Bethesda, Maryland this 30th day of April,1982